We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Edited by
Laurie J. Mckenzie, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston,Denise R. Nebgen, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
Cancer patients often have a variety of skin eruptions ranging from infections to irritant contact dermatitis. Reviewing gentle skin care and educating patients on potential side effects of various treatments, such as post-radiation dermatitis or vulvovaginal graft-versus-host disease, is beneficial. This chapter will focus on common vulvar conditions that may arise during cancer treatment such as infections (folliculitis, abscesses and furuncles, angioinvasive infections, herpesvirus and candidal infections), primary dermatoses (lichen sclerosus and lichen planus), and therapy side effects (genitourinary syndrome of menopause, lymphedema, acquired lymphatic anomaly, radiation dermatitis and recall, toxic erythema of chemotherapy, and immune-checkpoint inhibitor cutaneous toxicities). Additionally, considerations for vulvar biopsies are discussed.
Vulval disorders are not uncommon in obstetric practice. This chapter aims to enhance clinical skills in patient assessment, vulval examination and treatment of common benign vulval skin disease and infections. Basic treatments often benefit the patient (e.g. use of emollients and topical steroids). Some patients have complex disease and can present with more than one condition, so careful assessment and individualised management is essential. Understanding of when to refer onwards to a gynaecologist and even a vulval specialist service is important to optimise clinical outcomes.
Recurrent vulvovaginitis (RVV) is a common gynaecological condition affecting women in all age groups. Different aetiological factors can present with similar symptoms and signs. It is important to identify the cause to provide the appropriate treatment.
The three main causes include Candidiasis, bacterial vaginosis, and Trichomonas vaginalis. This is in addition to dermatological and hormone-dependent conditions such as erosive lichen planus, atrophic vaginitis and desquamative inflammatory vaginitis.
Some risk factors for RVV have been identified; for example, diabetes, sex attitudes and hypoestrogenic state.
Management of RVV may represent a challenge to healthcare professionals. It is important to realize the effect of the condition on the woman’s physical and psychological wellbeing, and the impact on their quality of life.
This study compared the therapeutic efficacy of steroidal and non-steroidal agents for treating oral lichen planus.
Methods:
Forty patients with clinical and/or histologically proven oral lichen planus were randomly placed into four groups and treated with topical triamcinolone, oral dapsone, topical tacrolimus or topical retinoid for three months. Pre- and post-treatment symptoms and signs were scored for each patient.
Results:
Patients in all treatment groups showed significant clinical improvement after three months (p < 0.05), with steroidal and non-steroidal agents having equal efficacy. Furthermore, of the non-steroidal drugs, oral dapsone had greater efficacy than topical retinoid (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences in outcome were recorded for oral dapsone vs topical tacrolimus (p > 0.05) and for topical retinoid vs topical tacrolimus (p > 0.05).
Conclusion:
Non-steroidal drugs such as dapsone, tacrolimus and retinoid are as efficacious as steroidal drugs for treating oral lichen planus, and avoid the side effects associated with steroids.
We report an extremely rare case of laryngeal lichen planus.
Method:
A case report and literature review of the aetiopathogenesis, clinical features and management of laryngeal lichen planus are presented.
Results:
A male patient presented with hoarseness and a history suggestive of squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx. However, characteristic histopathological findings demonstrated lichen planus. The patient responded very well to oral steroids, and at the time of writing had remained symptom-free for two years.
Conclusion:
This is the first English language report of laryngeal lichen planus. Lichen planus is a diagnosis of exclusion and responds well to steroids. However, patients should be followed up regularly as malignant change is known to occur.
Background: Of the acquired ear canal atresias, idiopathic, inflammatory, medial meatal, fibrotising otitis has been suggested as a distinct disease entity, for reasons of aetiology.
Objective:
To report three more cases of idiopathic, inflammatory, medial meatal, fibrotising otitis and to further consider the possible relationship between this condition and lichen planus.
Patients:
Three adult patients with idiopathic, inflammatory, medial meatal, fibrotising otitis, two with bilateral aural symptoms, treated and followed up at the department of otorhinolaryngology of Helsinki University Hospital.
Results:
We found idiopathic, inflammatory, medial meatal, fibrotising otitis, affecting solely the glabrous skin of the osseous part of the external ear canals, in three patients who also suffered from severe oral lichen planus.
Conclusions:
The aetiopathology or pathophysiology of idiopathic, inflammatory, medial meatal, fibrotising otitis may be linked with lichen planus. Early, active treatment of idiopathic, inflammatory, medial meatal, fibrotising otitis with local corticosteroids may prevent total medial meatal atresia.
A case of bilateral progressive stenosis of both external auditory canals with resultant conductive hearing loss is presented. The stenosis revealed multifocal erosive and synechiant lichen planus. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of lichen planus involvement of the external ear.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.