We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Depression is common in patients suffering from somatic diseases particularly chronic, life threatening and disabling diseases such as renal impairment requiring hemodyalisis. It contributes to further deterioration of the quality of life. The goal of consultation psychiatry is to advise screening and early interventions for this most often treatable disorder.
Aims
To assess and compare presence and severity of depression, and subjective assessment of QOL between patients on hemodialysis and healthy subjects.
Methods
This study included 80 subjects age between 19 and 82 (× 49.6 ± 14.2) on continuous hemodyalis and 40 subjects from the general population of Zenica. Assessment instruments used: Beck Depression Inventory – BDI; SF36- QOL, and sociodemographic questionnaire.
Results
The subjects in the experimental group had significantly higher (p<0.05) average score on BDI, 17.1 ± 9.4, corresponding to mild to moderate depression compared with the subjects in control group who scored an average of 8.5 ± 7.0 (range 2-39), which corresponds to absence of depression. Comparison of results on a scale for assessing the quality of life SF 36, indicates that the subjects in the control had a higher average score or higher quality of life compared to the experimental group.
Conclusion
The research results indicate a significant difference in the presence of depressive symptoms and in the subjective assessment of QOL in patients on hemodialysis compared to healthy subjects. This justifies routine screening for depression in this group of patients.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.