Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

2 results

  • Was There a Diplomatic Alternative? The Atomic Bombing and Japan's Surrender

  • Jeremy Kuzmarov, Roger Peace
  • Journal:
    Asia-Pacific Journal / Volume 19 / Issue 20 / October 2021
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    14 March 2025, e4
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • This article assesses the evidence for claims that the dropping of the atomic bombs were essential for securing Japan's surrender and offers an alternative interpretation.

  • 6 - Placing Preferences and Policies on a Common Scale

  • from Part I - Stages
  • Brian F. Crisp, Washington University, St Louis, Santiago Olivella, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Guillermo Rosas, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book:
    The Chain of Representation
    Published online:
    10 January 2020
    Print publication:
    19 March 2020, pp 91-116

  • Summary

    We learn from this excursus that the amount of available information covaries significantly with the discriminating power of different stimuli, but not with the recovered country-specific “policy moods,” which are the quantities of interest. Our policy moods summarize respondents’ views on a number of stimuli; although these stimuli are not consistently repeated year after year, the summaries relay information about policy stances, and not only information about the number of stimuli included in any given year.