Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • Chapter 15 - Darwinian Analogies in Thinking about Art and Culture

  • from Part III - Humanism after Darwin
  • Edited by Devin Griffiths, University of Southern California, Deanna Kreisel, University of Mississippi
  • Book:
    After Darwin
    Published online:
    01 December 2022
    Print publication:
    15 December 2022, pp 199-210

  • Summary

    The ability of conscious human subjects to modify their behavior and adapt their institutions to changing circumstances has never been in question. Lamarck and Darwin innovated by making natural species the outcomes of adaptation to environmental pressures: thus, not only human institutions, but natural kinds, fell under the heading of choice and change. This plasticity raised the question of heritability, or the persistence of somatic learning across generations. Attempts to formulate a physical basis for inheritance through the second half of the nineteenth century relied on analogies drawn from technology and culture and, in return, suggested new ways of describing and explaining cultural facts. Neo-Lamarckianism in France spurred the creation of analogies involving biology, chemistry, psychology, and aesthetics, as a protest against the reduction of inheritance to features of the gene.