Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 7 - A Case for Extraterritorial Due Diligence Obligations in the Human Rights Context

  • Maria Monnheimer
  • Book:
    Due Diligence Obligations in International Human Rights Law
    Published online:
    05 February 2021
    Print publication:
    18 February 2021, pp 258-321

  • Summary

    The seventh chapter addresses extraterritorial due diligence obligations which impose upon capable states a duty to regulate harmful conduct of non-state actors operating abroad. In a first step, the chapter explains that such obligations are not generally incompatible with international law and do not infringe upon the principle of non-intervention. It is further suggested that they could even be qualified as mandatory under certain circumstances and states should diligently regulate extraterritorial conduct where they have a sufficient jurisdictional nexus. The chapter concludes with an investigation of two extraterritorial constellations in which such obligations could contribute to more effective human rights protection: the trade of arms and the activities of multinational corporations. Recent examples of domestic legislation such as the 2017 French Law on Duty of Care underline that state practice is emerging which supports the claim for accepting extraterritorial human rights obligations and provides guidance for future action.