Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T06:56:46.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How does human-induced environmental change influence host-parasite interactions?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2013

ALEXANDRE BUDRIA*
Affiliation:
Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
ULRIKA CANDOLIN
Affiliation:
Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
*
* Corresponding author: Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland. E-mail: alexandre.budria@helsinki.fi
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Host-parasite interactions are an integral part of ecosystems that influence both ecological and evolutionary processes. Humans are currently altering environments the world over, often with drastic consequences for host-parasite interactions and the prevalence of parasites. The mechanisms behind the changes are, however, poorly known. Here, we explain how host-parasite interactions depend on two crucial steps – encounter rate and host-parasite compatibility – and how human activities are altering them and thereby host-parasite interactions. By drawing on examples from the literature, we show that changes in the two steps depend on the influence of human activities on a range of factors, such as the density and diversity of hosts and parasites, the search strategy of the parasite, and the avoidance strategy of the host. Thus, to unravel the mechanisms behind human-induced changes in host-parasite interactions, we have to consider the characteristics of all three parts of the interaction: the host, the parasite and the environment. More attention should now be directed to unfold these mechanisms, focusing on effects of environmental change on the factors that determine encounter rate and compatibility. We end with identifying several areas in urgent need of more investigations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

INTRODUCTION

Parasites are ubiquitous in ecosystems (Dobson et al. Reference Dobson, Lafferty, Kuris, Hechinger and Jetz2008). They influence ecological and evolutionary processes and consequently have a profound impact on the structure and function of ecosystems. The harm that they inflict on their hosts alters population dynamics and the temporal and spatial distribution of both hosts and parasites. The harm also causes antagonistic coevolution between hosts and parasites and, hence, shapes their characteristics, such as morphologies and life-histories (Combes, Reference Combes2001).

The survival of parasites depends on the successful exploitation of their hosts. This hinges on the encounter rate with hosts and the compatibility between the hosts and the parasite, i.e. on the ability of the parasite to successfully infect the host. Changes in the environment that influence encounter rate or compatibility can alter host-parasite interactions (Thompson, Reference Thompson1994, Reference Thompson2005; Wolinska and King, Reference Wolinska and King2009). Human-induced environmental changes often differ from natural changes in that they are more rapid and occur at larger spatial scales (Turner II et al. Reference Turner, Kasperson, Meyer, Dow, Golding, Kasperson, Mitchell and Ratick1990; Palumbi, Reference Palumbi2001). They can be classified into five main categories: climate change, habitat change, introduction of exotic species, human harvesting and pollution (e.g. Sih, Reference Sih2013). Much evidence currently exists for effects of human-induced environmental changes on the distribution and abundance of parasites (Lafferty and Kuris, Reference Lafferty, Kuris, Thomas, Guégan and Renaud2005). However, our understanding of the underlying mechanisms, i.e. how environmental changes alter encounter rate and compatibility, has remained poor. To improve our knowledge of the consequences of anthropogenic disturbances for host-parasite interactions, we need to clarify effects on these underlying mechanisms. Here, our aim is to review our current knowledge of the mechanisms that regulate host-parasite interactions and examine how humans are altering them, and the consequences that these alterations in turn have for host-parasite interactions. We use examples from the literature to illustrate how humans are altering these mechanisms and the consequences the changes have for both hosts and parasites.

We begin with explaining the importance of host encounter rate and host-parasite compatibility for the viability and evolution of both host and parasite populations. We describe how both processes depend on environmental conditions and, hence, are vulnerable to anthropogenic disturbances. We then proceed to discuss how human-induced environmental changes are influencing encounter rate and compatibility. We first review impacts of humans on encounter rate, through effects on a range of factors, such as the density and diversity of hosts and parasites, the search strategy of the parasite, and the avoidance strategy of the host. We then discuss impacts of humans on host-parasite compatibility, i.e. on parasite virulence and host resistance, considering both plastic and evolutionary effects. Finally, we discuss how complex interactions among multiple parasite species can cause intricate effects of environmental change on host-parasite interactions. We end with pointing out several areas in need of more investigation.

We consider all organisms that cause harm to another during a sustained contact as parasites, including both micro-parasites, such as viruses and bacteria, and macro-parasites, such as ticks and worms (Combes, Reference Combes2001). We concentrate on human-induced changes to the external environment of the host, and how changes in this in turn cause changes to the internal environment of the host, the immediate environment of the parasite (Thomas et al. Reference Thomas, Brown, Sukhdeo and Renaud2002). We leave out intended changes by humans to the internal environment of the host, through medical or veterinary interventions, as these have been dealt with elsewhere (e.g. Gandon et al. Reference Gandon, Mackinnon, Nee and Read2003; Davies and Davies, Reference Davies and Davies2010).

THE IMPORTANCE OF HOST-parasite encounters and compatibility

The specialization of a parasite on a particular host can be described as a two-step process: first, the parasite must pass through an ‘encounter filter’ to reach the potential host, and second, the parasite has to pass through the ‘compatibility filter’ and successfully infect the host (Combes, Reference Combes2001). The first step – passing through the encounter filter – has similarities with optimal foraging as it depends on (1) the spatial and temporal overlap between the parasite and the host, (2) the ability of the parasite to locate and encounter the host and (3) the avoidance behaviour of the host (Lewis et al. Reference Lewis, Campbell and Sukhdeo2002; Raffel et al. Reference Raffel, Martin and Rohr2008; Wajnberg et al. Reference Wajnberg, Bernstein and Van Alphen2008). The second step – passing through the compatibility filter – determines whether an infection will occur given an encounter. It includes the specialization of the parasite on a particular host, and the susceptibility of the host to the parasite.

The efficiency of the filters can change over time through antagonistic co-evolution. Parasites are selected to open filters, to increase host encounters and compatibility, while hosts are selected to close filters. Selection on parasites will favour traits that increase the probability of encounters and compatibility. Good examples are parasitic worms that manipulate the behaviour of their intermediate host to facilitate the transmission of their larvae to the final host. Selection on hosts will in turn favour traits that reduce encounters and increase resistance to infection. For instance, the larvae of Drosophila melanogaster have evolved foraging strategies that minimize the risk of encountering parasitoids (Carton and Sokolowski, Reference Carton and Sokolowski1992).

Both the encounter filter and the compatibility filter depend on environmental factors, such as host density and characteristics of the habitat (e.g. Poulin, Reference Poulin2003). Changes in the environment that alter these filters also alter host-parasite interactions (see Fig. 1). For instance, habitat fragmentation that reduces host encounter rate reduces infection rate. Changes in host-parasite interactions can in turn induce plastic and evolutionary changes in the traits that determine encounters and compatibility and, thus, cause alterations in species characteristics and in the abundance of parasites and hosts. These changes can have further consequences for the structure and function of ecosystems. Thus, the interaction between ecological and evolutionary processes (eco-evolutionary dynamics) can cause continually changing host-parasite systems, which are influenced by changes in the environment, and which themselves cause further changes to the environment.

Fig. 1. An outline of the pathways through which human-induced environmental changes influence host-parasite interactions. Alterations in the environment can influence the first step in a host-parasite interaction, the encounter rate between hosts and parasites, i.e. the encounter filter, or the second step, the compatibility between the host and the parasite, i.e. the compatibility filter (adjusted from Combes, 1991). A human-induced environmental change, such as pollution, can influence both filters and several mechanisms within the filters, but for simplicity only a few pathways are presented.

In the following sections, we will review how humans are altering the factors and processes that determine encounters and compatibility between parasites and hosts, and how changes in these two steps in turn influence host-parasite interactions. In Table 1, we give an overview of various human-induced environmental changes that have been shown to alter encounter rate and compatibility and that are discussed in this review.

Table 1. Examples of anthropogenic disturbances affecting host-parasite interactions. The disturbances affect various factors that mediate the interaction between hosts and parasites, through their effects on the two filters: host encounters and host-parasite compatibility

ALTERATIONS OF HOST-parasite encounter rate

A parasite's encounter rate with its host depends on a range of factors, such as the spatial and temporal distribution of the host and the parasite, the species composition of the community, the search strategy of the parasite, and the avoidance strategy of the host. These factors can be altered by human-induced environmental changes. Next, we will examine how humans are influencing host-parasite encounters through effects on these factors.

Changes in the density of hosts

A major determinant of the transmission rate of a parasite is the availability of susceptible hosts (Anderson and May, Reference Anderson and May1979; May and Anderson, Reference Anderson and May1979; Arneberg et al. Reference Arneberg, Skorping, Grenfell and Read1998). This has to exceed a minimum density – the critical threshold – to allow enough transmissions to maintain the parasite population. Human activities that alter the density of hosts can consequently have a major effect on host-parasite encounter rate and, hence, on parasite transmission (e.g. Farnsworth et al. Reference Farnsworth, Wolfe, Hobbs, Burnham, Williams, Theobald, Conner and Miller2005).

Human activities that drastically reduce the density of hosts are expected to reduce encounter rate and thereby parasite transmission rate and abundance (Lyles and Dobson, Reference Lyles and Dobson1993; Keeling and Grenfell, Reference Keeling and Grenfell1997; Arneberg et al. Reference Arneberg, Skorping, Grenfell and Read1998; Morand and Poulin, Reference Morand and Poulin1998; Dunn et al. Reference Dunn, Harris, Colwell, Koh and Sodhi2009). In support of this, Altizer et al. (Reference Altizer, Nunn and Lindenfors2007) found that primates threatened because of various anthropogenic disturbances carry fewer parasite species than sister taxa that are less threatened. Similarly, fish populations that are declining because of overfishing and other human-induced changes are less parasitized than stable populations (Amundsen and Kristoffersen, Reference Amundsen and Kristoffersen1990; Wood et al. Reference Wood, Lafferty and Micheli2010). For instance, the decline of lake trout populations Salvelinus namaycush in the Great Lakes of North America because of intensive fishing correlates with lower parasite prevalence. Inspection of museum specimens revealed that trout caught before 1925 were more often infected by the nematode Cystidicola stigmatura than trout caught after 1925 (Black, Reference Black1983, Reference Black1985). Amundsen and Kristoffersen (Reference Amundsen and Kristoffersen1990) showed experimentally that a reduction in the density of hosts can decrease parasite prevalence. When they reduced the density of whitefish Coregonus spp. in Lake Stuorajarvi in Norway, the prevalence of the cestode Diphyllobothrium ditremum decreased although the abundance of its intermediate and definitive hosts – copepods and birds – did not change. Further support for an influence of human-induced reductions in host density on parasitism is provided by a literature survey. This found infectious diseases to decrease over time in marine fishes that are declining, but to increase over time in marine taxa that are not declining (Ward and Lafferty, Reference Ward and Lafferty2004).

Correspondingly, human activities that increase host density are expected to raise encounter rate and, hence, parasite abundance, as a higher host density intensifies contacts among hosts. In support of this, the stocking of Lake Kilpisjärvi in Finland with whitefish increased parasite infections. However, a cessation of stocking did not reduce parasite abundance (Tolonen and Kjellman, Reference Tolonen and Kjellman2001). This suggests that other factors than density also influenced the abundance of parasites.

Human activities also can influence parasite transmission rate indirectly, by influencing the density of the predators that prey upon the hosts. For instance, the introduction of the predatory fish salmon Salmo salar into Lake Kvernavann in Norway has led to a dramatic decrease in the prevalence of the cestode Schistocephalus solidus in the population of threespine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus in the lake, as the salmon selectively preys upon parasitized stickleback (Jakobsen et al. Reference Jakobsen, Johnsen and Larsson1988).

Human-induced environmental changes that alter the distribution of hosts and, hence, local density, also alter parasite transmission rate. Habitat fragmentation, for instance, that forces individuals to aggregate in a few localities, can increase encounter rate and, thus, parasite transmission rate (Garnett and Holmes, Reference Garnett and Holmes1996; McCallum and Dobson, Reference McCallum and Dobson2002). An example is the recent growth of human populations in eastern Kenya, which has fragmented the habitat of the endemic monkey Tana River red colobus Procolobus rufomitratus (Wieczkowski and Mbora, Reference Wieczkowski and Mbora2000; Mbora and Meikle, Reference Mbora and Meikle2004a , Reference Mbora and Meikle b ). This has increased the density of monkeys in isolated patches, which in turn has made the species more vulnerable to parasites (Mbora and McPeek, Reference Mbora and McPeek2009).

Human-induced alterations in the density of a host also can influence encounter rate with the next host in the life-cycle of the parasite, as many parasites infect several host species sequentially. For instance, human-induced increases in the growth of algae in aquatic ecosystems have increased the density and size of planorbid snails, the primary intermediate hosts of the trematode Ribeiroira ondatrae, and allowed the snails to tolerate longer infections. This has nearly doubled the number of cercariae larvae that are released from the snails and exposed to the next hosts in their life-cycle, fishes and amphibians (Johnson et al. Reference Johnson, Chase, Dosch, Hartson, Gross, Larson, Sutherland and Carpenter2007). This has increased the prevalence of malformations in amphibians (Fig. 2, Johnson and Chase, Reference Johnson and Chase2004; Johnson et al. Reference Johnson, Chase, Dosch, Hartson, Gross, Larson, Sutherland and Carpenter2007).

Fig. 2. An example of a complex life-cycle of a parasite. The life-cycle of the digenetic trematode Ribeiroia ondatrae involves both free-living stages, which are directly exposed to environmental perturbations, and parasitic stages, which rely on other organisms for development and reproduction and, hence, are indirectly influenced by effects on these organisms. The miracidia larvae infect aquatic snails, in which they develop to sporocysts. The sporocysts produce cercariae asexually, which are released into the water where they search for amphibians to infect. In the frogs, the cercariae develop into metacercariae, which cause malformations in amphibians. Predation by birds transmits the metacercariae to the definitive bird host, where the metacercariae mature and reproduce sexually. Anthropogenic disturbances that affect at least one of the different stages can compromise the completion of the whole life-cycle of the parasite.

Changes in the density of parasites

Human activities that alter the density of parasites can similarly alter the encounter rate between hosts and parasites and, thus influence parasite transmission rate. Reductions in parasite density are likely to reduce parasite transmission rate, while increases in parasite density can increase parasite transmission rate.

Human-induced environmental changes influence the density of parasites both directly – such as global warming that influences the growth rate of parasites – and indirectly by altering the density of hosts (discussed in the previous section), of competitors, or of predators that prey on parasites. An example of an indirect effect of alterations in predator density on parasite density is the removal by humans of the fishes that prey on the crab Mithrax nodosus. The crab is a predator on parasitic eulimid snails – Sabinella shaskyi and Pelseneeria spp. – that infect the sea urchin Eucidaris galapagensis. Thus, an increased density of the crab because of overfishing has reduced the density of the parasitic snails (Sonnenholzner et al. Reference Sonnenholzner, Lafferty and Ladah2011). Correspondingly, a recent meta-analysis (Zhao et al. Reference Zhao, Neher, Fu, Li and Wang2013) found human use of herbicides to benefit plant-parasitic nematodes by suppressing the density of the predatory nematodes that feed on these parasitic nematodes.

Global warming because of anthropogenic activities is expected to have positive effects on the abundance of many parasites, as temperature can accelerate their growth and maturation rates (reviewed in Chubb, Reference Chubb1977, Reference Chubb1979, Reference Chubb1980, Reference Chubb1982). Accordingly, elevated temperature has been found to accelerate the development rate of trematode eggs and allow trematodes to complete their life-cycles more rapidly. This has increased the production and transmission rate of trematodes (Poulin, Reference Poulin2006; Paull and Johnson, Reference Paull and Johnson2011). Elevated temperature was also found to accelerate the growth rate of the cestode S. solidus in its secondary intermediate host, the threespine stickleback (Macnab and Barber, Reference Macnab and Barber2012). As higher parasite weight increases the fecundity of the parasite in its definitive host, birds (Tierney & Crompton, 1992), elevated temperatures could increase egg production and thus parasite transmission rate.

Anthropogenic pollution is another factor with major effects on parasite abundance and thereby on the transmission of parasites to hosts. For instance, Kelly et al. (Reference Kelly, Poulin, Tompkins and Townsend2010) showed that the exposure of the snail Potamopyrgus antipodarum to moderate levels of the common herbicide glyphosate increases the production and release by the snail of the infective cercarial stages of the trematode Telogaster opistorchis. This raises in turn the density of parasites for the next host in the life-cycle of the trematode, juveniles of the freshwater fish Galaxias anomalus. Moreover, synergistic effects between the herbicide and the parasite amplify the negative impact of the parasite on infected fish, causing malformations and death of fish (Kelly et al. Reference Kelly, Poulin, Tompkins and Townsend2010).

Changes in the temporal distribution of hosts and parasites

The often ephemeral distribution of hosts forces parasites to adjust their temporal distribution to that of their hosts (Lewis et al. Reference Lewis, Campbell and Sukhdeo2002). For example, helminth parasites time the hatching and emergence of their larvae to abiotic factors associated with the presence of susceptible hosts, such as temperature, light and humidity (Pietrock and Marcogliese, Reference Pietrock and Marcogliese2003). This tracking of the presence of hosts can cause highly seasonal parasite epidemics (Altizer et al. Reference Altizer, Dobson, Hosseini, Hudson, Pascual and Rohani2006). Human-induced changes in abiotic factors that alter the temporal distribution of hosts will consequently also alter that of parasites. This can in turn induce evolutionary changes in the phenology of both hosts and parasites (Lafferty, Reference Lafferty2009).

A growing human-induced environmental problem that is affecting the phenology of both hosts and parasites is global warming (Rogers and Randolph, Reference Rogers and Randolph2006). For instance, higher temperature has been found to prolong the time window during which mosquitoes can breed and extend the period when mosquito-borne parasites are transmitted to humans (Reiter, Reference Reiter2001). This prolonged transmission period has been suggested to have contributed to the spread of the bluetongue virus in Europe during recent years (reviewed in Purse et al. Reference Purse, Mellor, Rogers, Samuel, Mertens and Baylis2005).

Global warming can also reduce the reliability of environmental cues as indicators of the ideal timing of life-history events (Schweiger et al. Reference Schweiger, Settele, Kudrna, Klotz and Kühn2008). This mis-timing can have particularly deleterious consequences for parasites that spend part of their life-cycle outside the host, where the host's internal temperature does not buffer them against changing environmental conditions. Little evidence exists, however, of mis-timed phenologies between hosts and parasites, probably because of the scarcity of long-term data series for the prevalence and abundance of parasites (Møller, Reference Møller2010).

Another anthropogenic disturbance that can have profound effects on the temporal distribution of both hosts and parasites is thermal pollution of aquatic ecosystems. For instance, a long-term study by Aho et al. (1982) found thermal discharges in cooling reservoirs to extend the transmission period of the metacercariae of the eyefluke Tylodelphys scheuringi. This increased infections in populations of mosquitofish Gambusia affinis.

Changes in the diversity of hosts and parasites

The encounter rate between a parasite and a host depends not only on the density of the target host, but also on that of alternative hosts and non-hosts, i.e. on the composition of the community (Thieltges et al. Reference Thieltges, Jensen and Poulin2008a ; Johnson and Thieltges, Reference Johnson and Thieltges2010). Human-induced introductions or removals of species can consequently have positive or negative effects on native host-parasite interactions, depending on how the change influences encounter rate with compatible hosts.

Human-induced introduction of novel host species promotes parasite transmission if a new compatible host-parasite association is formed from which parasites can be ‘spilled back’ to native hosts (reviewed in Kelly et al. Reference Kelly, Paterson, Townsend, Poulin and Tompkins2009b ). This can occur when the introduced and the native hosts are ecologically similar, i.e. the encounter filter is open, and when the two hosts are closely related so that the probability of compatibility with local parasites is high, i.e. the compatibility filter is open. Both the native and the introduced host will then experience higher parasitic pressure. The host that suffers the greatest negative impact might eventually go extinct (Anderson and May, Reference Anderson and May1979), or diverge ecologically and evolve lower overlap.

When humans introduce species that are not compatible with native parasites, the introduced species will experience a low risk of infection, in lines with the enemy release hypothesis (Torchin et al. Reference Torchin, Lafferty and Kuris2002, Reference Torchin, Lafferty, Dobson, McKenzie and Kuris2003; Torchin and Lafferty, Reference Torchin, Lafferty, Rilov and Crooks2008). This can dilute infection risks also for native hosts by increasing the parasite's encounters with and infection attempts on incompatible hosts and, thus, reduce the abundance of the parasite (Fig. 3, Keesing et al. Reference Keesing, Holt and Ostfeld2006; Johnson and Thieltges, Reference Johnson and Thieltges2010). An example of this is the introduction by humans of the European freshwater snail Lymnaea stagnalis to New Zealand at the end of the 19th century (Hutton, Reference Hutton1881). The introduced snail is less compatible than the native snail P. antipodarum with the native trematode Microphallus sp., i.e. the encounter filter is open but the compatibility filter is closed (Kopp and Jokela, Reference Kopp and Jokela2007). Thus, increased infection attempts on the introduced, incompatible snail has reduced the prevalence of the parasite, which in turn has reduced encounters with the compatible, native snail and released it from infections (Kopp and Jokela, Reference Kopp and Jokela2007). Similar dilution effects because of human-introduced species have been reported for various parasites of molluscs, fishes and mammals (e.g. Telfer et al. Reference Telfer, Bown, Sekules, Begon, Hayden and Birtles2005; Thieltges et al. Reference Thieltges, Reise, Prinz and Jensen2008b ; Kelly et al. Reference Kelly, Paterson, Townsend, Poulin and Tompkins2009a ; Paterson et al. Reference Paterson, Townsend, Poulin and Tompkins2011).

Fig. 3. The dilution of infection risks through increases in the density of incompatible hosts. Individuals of the white host population carry one parasite species able to differentially infect other host populations in the community. Black hosts are compatible hosts for the parasite (i.e. sources for the parasite population), while grey hosts are incompatible hosts (i.e. sinks for the parasite population). Although the population of white hosts remains constant under the three community structures, alterations in the composition of the host assemblage affect infection risk for the white hosts.

When human-introduced species bring with them non-indigenous parasites, these can be ‘spilled over’ to native hosts and affect them negatively. The topic has received considerable attention in the literature (Prenter et al. Reference Prenter, MacNeil, Dick and Dunn2004). A classic example is the massive mortality of amphibians worldwide because of global trade with African-clawed frogs Xenopus sp. The frogs, which are used in research, as pets, and to conduct pregnancy tests, carry the chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis on their skin, which is spread to native species when the frog is introduced into novel environments (Weldon et al. Reference Weldon, Du Preez, Hyatt, Muller and Speare2004; Ouellet et al. Reference Ouellet, Mikaelian, Pauli, Rodrigue and Green2005; Rachowicz et al. Reference Rachowicz, Hero, Alford, Taylor, Morgan, Vredenburg, Collins and Briggs2005). Another classic example is the worldwide spread of the swim-bladder nematode Anguillicola crassus with the commercial export of Japanese eel Anguilla japonica (Køie, Reference Køie1991). The low specificity of the nematode for intermediate hosts has allowed it to rapidly spread to other eel species, where it causes pathological damage to the swimbladder (Moravec, Reference Moravec1996; Moravec and Škoriková, Reference Moravec and Škoriková1998). This could have contributed to the dramatic decline of European eel Anguilla anguilla populations in recent years (Køie, Reference Køie1991).

Changes in search and avoidance strategies

The search strategy of the parasite and the avoidance strategy of the host depend crucially on environmental conditions. Human disturbances that influence these strategies can consequently alter host encounter rate. An insidious human-induced problem that is currently altering the behaviour of both parasites and hosts is chemical pollution. Chemical cues are often used by free-living stages of parasites to locate their hosts (Lewis et al. Reference Lewis, Campbell and Sukhdeo2002). This means that human activities that influence the chemical composition of the environment also alter host-parasite interactions. For instance, the increased use of pesticides has impaired the search behaviour of parasitic wasps by affecting their longevity, activity and orientation (Desneux et al. Reference Desneux, Decourtye and Delpuech2007).

Human-induced increases in the concentration of heavy metals pose a serious threat to host-parasite interactions, as the metals often influence the behaviour of both parasites and hosts. For example, Morley et al. (Reference Morley, Crane and Lewis2005) showed that a mixture of zinc and cadmium influences the energy expenditure of the cercarial larvae of the trematode Diplostomum spathaceum. The larvae normally shed their tails when their energy store is almost depleted in order to reduce energy use. When the larvae were exposed to a single metal, the frequency of tail losses increased with age. However, when the larvae were exposed to a mixture of metals, tail losses were delayed (Morley et al. Reference Morley, Crane and Lewis2002, Reference Morley, Crane and Lewis2005). This is expected to increase energy use and reduce energy store, and, hence, impair the activity and transmission rate of the parasite. Together with a reduction in the release of larvae from the intermediate snail host population, because of negative effects of heavy metals on snails (Coeurdassier et al. Reference Coeurdassier, De Vaufleury, Scheifler, Morhain and Badot2004), this could drastically reduce the prevalence of the parasite.

Changes in parasite avoidance behaviour of hosts because of human-induced environmental changes can be categorized into two main groups: (1) changes in pre-contact avoidance behaviour, such as habitat choice and selective foraging, and (2) changes in post-contact avoidance behaviour, such as grooming (Thieltges and Poulin, Reference Thieltges and Poulin2008). These changes are expected to influence host-parasite interactions. However, the impact that human-induced environmental changes have on avoidance behaviour has received surprisingly little attention. One exception is the study by Rohr et al. (Reference Rohr, Swan, Raffel and Hudson2009) on the influence of the herbicide atrazine on parasite avoidance behaviour of tadpoles of the American toad Bufo americanus.

ALTERATIONS OF HOST-parasite compatibility

In the preceding section, we discussed how human-induced environmental changes can influence the probability that a parasite encounters a compatible host. We now turn to discuss how human-induced changes in the environment can influence infection success, and the severity of the infection, through effects on the compatibility between the parasite and the host, i.e. through effects on parasite virulence and host resistance. Virulence and resistance are determined by environmental and genetic factors and develop through antagonistic coevolution between the parasite and the host. Human-induced changes in the environment can induce immediate plastic changes, or longer-term genetic changes, both of which can alter host-parasite interactions.

Parasite virulence can be defined as the degree to which a parasite harms a host, or more exactly, reduces its fitness (Ebert and Herre, Reference Ebert and Herre1996; Ebert and Bull, Reference Ebert and Bull2003; Alizon et al. Reference Alizon, Hurford, Mideo and Van Baalen2009). According to the transmission-virulence trade-off hypothesis, higher virulence limits the transmission rate of the parasite, as most hosts will die before the parasite has been transmitted to a new host. Parasite strains with high virulence may therefore quickly go extinct (Ewald, Reference Ewald1983; Lipsitch and Moxon, Reference Lipsitch and Moxon1997; Alizon et al. Reference Alizon, Hurford, Mideo and Van Baalen2009). Human-induced increases in host density can allow the evolution of higher virulence, as growth rate is then not limited by encounter rate, but by replication rate.

Plastic changes in virulence and resistance

The degree to which human-induced environmental changes cause plastic alterations in parasite virulence and host resistance depends on the genetic constitution of the individuals, as genes determine reaction norms and, thus, how traits vary across environments. Common causes of plastic adjustments of parasite virulence are alterations in host condition or in the intensity of competition for hosts (e.g. Tseng, Reference Tseng2006; Tschirren et al. Reference Tschirren, Bischoff, Saladin and Richner2007; Choisy and de Roode, Reference Choisy and de Roode2010). Plastic changes in parasite virulence can in turn cause plastic changes in host resistance.

Human-induced global warming is increasingly recognized as a potential cause of increased virulence of parasites, as temperature often acts as an ‘on-off’ switch for the expression of virulence genes (Konkel and Tilly, Reference Konkel and Tilly2000; see Marcogliese, Reference Marcogliese2001; Mitchell et al. Reference Mitchell, Rogers, Little and Read2005). This is currently contributing to the worldwide bleaching of corals – the loss of endosymbiotic zooxanthellae – through effects of temperature on the expression of virulence factors in bacteria that inhibits photosynthesis of the zooxanthellae (reviewed in Rosenberg and Ben-Haim, Reference Rosenberg and Ben-Haim2002). For instance, the current decline of the coral Oculina patagonica is caused by global warming activating the expression of several virulence factors in the coral-bleaching bacterium Vibrio shiloi (reviewed in Rosenberg and Falkovitz, Reference Rosenberg and Falkovitz2004).

Similarly, various forms of human-induced pollution alter virulence and resistance by causing physiological changes in parasites and hosts. Chemical pollutants, in particular, can impair immune responses of hosts by altering the production, longevity, structure and function of the cells and proteins of the immune system (Schuurman et al. Reference Schuurman, Frieke Kuper and Vos1994; Banerjee, Reference Banerjee1999; Blakley et al. Reference Blakley, Brousseau, Fournier and Voccia1999; Jorgensen, Reference Jorgensen2010). For example, chemical compounds that impair the production of the mucus that protects the gills of fishes can hamper resistance, as the mucus contains compounds that trap and inhibit the growth of microorganisms (see Shephard, Reference Shephard1994; Bols et al. Reference Bols, Brubacher, Ganassin and Lee2001; Alvarez-Pellitero, Reference Alvarez-Pellitero2008 and references therein). Petroleum hydrocarbons, for instance, impair mucus production in cod, which increase the prevalence of gill parasites, such as ciliates and monogeneans (Khan and Kiceniuk, Reference Khan and Kiceniuk1988; Khan, Reference Khan1990). Another chemical pollutant that hampers the functioning of the immune system in a range of fishes and amphibians is the herbicide atrazine (Rohr and McCoy, Reference Rohr and McCoy2010). It triggers the degeneration of macrophages in mullets (Biagianti-Risbourg, Reference Biagianti-Risbourg1990), lowers the respiratory burst activity of circulating phagocytes in rainbow trout (Rymuszka et al. Reference Rymuszka, Siwicki and Sieroslawska2007), and reduces the abundance of T cells in a number of species (e.g. Christin et al. Reference Christin, Gendron, Brousseau, Ménard, Marcogliese, Cyr, Ruby and Fournier2003; Christin et al. Reference Christin, Menard, Gendron, Ruby, Cyr, Marcogliese, Rollins-Smith and Fournier2004; Rymuszka et al. Reference Rymuszka, Siwicki and Sieroslawska2007). A meta-analysis found the herbicide to reduce 77% of the immune responses that were included in the analysis (Rohr and McCoy, Reference Rohr and McCoy2010). On the other hand, the herbicide has positive effects on the immune system of some species, through complex interactions between the herbicide and physiological functions (e.g. Chakrabarty and Banerjee, Reference Chakrabarty and Banerjee1988; Sures, Reference Sures2006; Sures, Reference Sures2008).

Anthropogenic disturbances can influence host resistance also indirectly, through trade-offs between resistance and other fitness functions (Martin et al. Reference Martin, Hopkins, Mydlarz and Rohr2010). For instance, Adamo and Lovett (Reference Adamo and Lovett2011) showed that increasing temperatures because of global warming increases reproductive output, mass gain and the activity of the immune system in the cricket Gryllus texensis. Because of physiological trade-offs between reproduction and disease resistance, the increased effort reduces resistance to some parasites. This suggests that global warming could cause crickets to become more susceptible to some parasites.

Evolutionary changes in virulence and resistance

Human activities that cause longer-term changes in the environment can induce evolutionary changes in virulence and resistance if genetic variation in the direction of selection exists, or is introduced through gene flow or mutations. The influence of human activities on the evolution of parasite virulence is especially pronounced at farms where the density of hosts is high, as high host density favours higher parasite virulence (Murray and Peeler, Reference Murray and Peeler2005; Mennerat et al. Reference Mennerat, Nilsen, Ebert and Skorping2010). In aquacultures, the density of one species can even be a thousand times higher than in the wild (Pulkkinen et al. Reference Pulkkinen, Suomalainen, Read, Ebert, Rintamaki and Valtonen2010). An example of a parasite that has evolved more virulent strains is the salmon louse Lepeophtheirus salmonis at salmon farms (Mennerat et al. 2012). After the rapid growth of aquaculture, the more virulent strains have amplified and spread to wild salmonid populations, where they have had adverse effects on the natural stocks (Krkošek et al. Reference Krkošek, Ford, Morton, Lele, Myers and Lewis2007; Costello, Reference Costello2009). Another example of the evolution of more virulent strains is the bacterial fish parasite Flavobacterium columnare, which frequently causes severe parasite outbreaks at fish farms (Kunttu et al. Reference Kunttu, Valtonen, Jokinen and Suomalainen2009; Pulkkinen et al. Reference Pulkkinen, Suomalainen, Read, Ebert, Rintamaki and Valtonen2010).

A classic example of human-induced coevolution between host resistance and parasite virulence is the release of the myxomatosis poxvirus in Australia to control the population growth of the introduced European rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus. The most lethal strain of the virus, originating from America, was released during the 1950s. This caused dramatic mortality among the rabbits, with over 99% of the infected rabbits dying. Within 10 years, a less virulent strain of the virus had established itself, which killed only 50% of infected rabbits (Fenner and Marshall, Reference Fenner and Marshall1957; Marshall and Fenner, Reference Marshall and Fenner1960). The higher survival of the infected rabbits enhanced the transmission of the less virulent strain, which in turn selected for enhanced host defence (Massad, Reference Massad1987). This led to the evolution of resistant rabbits, which in turn selected for higher virulence (Best and Kerr, Reference Best and Kerr2000).

For parasite virulence and host defences to evolve, they need to be heritable and express genetic variation in the direction of selection. Declining populations often suffer from the loss of genetic variation. This can hamper the evolution of host defences against parasites and further worsen the probability of survival of the populations. For instance, several threatened vertebrate taxa show less variation in the genes of the major histocompatibility complex, MHC, which is involved in parasite recognition (e.g. Hedrick et al. Reference Hedrick, Parker, Miller and Miller1999, Reference Hedrick, Parker, Gutiérrez-Espeleta, Rattink and Lievers2000; Giese and Hedrick, Reference Giese and Hedrick2003). An example of this is captivity inbred winter-run chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, which are less resistant to three species of parasites than outbred populations (Arkush et al. Reference Arkush, Giese, Mendonca, McBride, Marty and Hedrick2002). This is particularly evident for salmon that are homozygous for the MHC genes. Surprisingly, wild Chinook populations show high allelic diversity for the MHC genes compared with other genes, despite also being inbred (Garrigan and Hedrick, Reference Garrigan and Hedrick2001).

THE INFLUENCE OF CO-INFECTIONS

We have so far focused on single-parasite infections where one parasite infects a host. However, hosts are often infected by several different parasite species (multi-specific infections) or different strains of a parasite (multi-strain infections). Interactions between these can influence the outcome of the different infections. This is particularly the case when parasites exploit overlapping niches and niche switches within the host are not possible (Mideo, Reference Mideo2009; Rigaud et al. Reference Rigaud, Perrot-Minnot and Brown2010; Bordes and Morand, Reference Bordes and Morand2011; Eswarappa et al. Reference Eswarappa, Estrela and Brown2012). Facilitation and competition between the co-infecting parasites can then select for higher parasite virulence, which in turn can select for changes in host defences and cause coevolution between the host and the multiple parasites (Bradley and Jackson, Reference Bradley and Jackson2008; Horrocks et al. Reference Horrocks, Matson and Tieleman2011).

Anthropogenic disturbances can alter these interactions among multiple parasite species through two different pathways: (1) by changing the diversity and distribution of the parasite species and the host, which can alter the probability of co-infections, and (2) by causing modifications in parasite virulence and host resistance. Our current knowledge of multi-parasite interactions is still in its infancy (Rigaud et al. Reference Rigaud, Perrot-Minnot and Brown2010), but a recent study on Babesia infections in lions Panthera leo in the Serengeti and Ngorongoro Crater suggests that climate change could amplify negative effects of co-infections on parasite abundance. The study found severe outbreaks of the tick-borne haemoparasite Babesia to correlate with epidemics of canine distemper virus in lions (Munson et al. Reference Munson, Terio, Kock, Mlengeya, Roelke, Dubovi, Summers, Sinclair and Packer2008). However, the immunodepression induced by the canine distemper virus could not alone explain the severity of the Babesia infections. Instead, the extreme drought that preceded the canine distemper epidemic must have weakened the herbivores that carried the ticks that transfer Babesia to lions. This could have allowed the tick population to grow, and increased the encounter rate with lions when the rains resumed. A simultaneous outbreak of the canine distemper virus reduced the resistance of the lions, which magnified the Babesia infections. Thus, the climate extreme disrupted a stable host-parasite system and caused mass mortality of lions.

CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

In this review, we have examined how human-induced environmental changes influence host-parasite interactions through effects on the two main steps of infection: host encounters and host-parasite compatibility. The effect of environmental change can be both direct and indirect (through effects on other species), and induce both immediate plastic and longer-term genetic changes. It is obvious that the ultimate influence of human disturbance depends on a range of abiotic and biotic factors. Thus, to unravel the impact of humans on host-parasite interactions, and to reveal the mechanisms behind the effects, we have to consider the characteristics of all three components of the interaction: the parasite(s), the host(s) and the surrounding environment.

Human disturbance is likely to have the most profound impact on host-parasite systems where parasites have multiple, successive hosts. This is because multiple hosts increase the probability that at least one host will be affected by the disturbance (Marcogliese, Reference Marcogliese2001), or that gene flow will hamper local adaptation (e.g. Louhi et al. Reference Louhi, Karvonen, Rellstab and Jokela2010). Similarly, human disturbances are expected to affect specialist parasites more than generalists, as specialists require an evolutionary host switch before they can use another host.

The ultimate consequences of human-induced alterations of host-parasite interactions on the structure and function of ecosystems are poorly known. Parasites mediate many species interactions and changes in host-parasite interactions could therefore have profound impacts on ecosystems (Marcogliese, Reference Marcogliese2004). More investigations are currently needed on the mechanisms behind the effects of man-made changes on host-parasite interactions, and their consequences for the structure and function of communities and ecosystems. We end this review with a few suggestions on topics that are in particular need of more research.

First, researchers should attempt to link human-induced changes at the two steps of infection to each other, i.e. link changes in host encounter rate to changes in compatibility, and vice versa. Much research has focused on coevolution between virulence and resistance, but the co-evolution between the two steps, encounter rate and compatibility, has received little attention. The whole life-cycle of the parasites should here be considered, as investigation of a restricted number of life-history stages may not reveal the ultimate effect of changes in the environment.

Second, further investigations are needed on the influence of human-induced environmental change on co-infections by multiple parasite species (or strains) and their effects on host-parasite interactions. Co-infections are common in nature and by focusing on single parasite infections we may severely underestimate the influence of human activities on both hosts and parasites.

Third, researchers have to consider how humans impact host-parasite interactions through effects on the community of species. Human-induced environmental change may cause parasites to switch between hosts, through plastic or evolutionary responses, while changes in the parasite fauna may induce competition and facilitation among parasites. These changes may further alter host-parasite interactions. More investigations are particularly needed on the consequences of changes in the density of human populations for plastic and evolutionary changes in host-parasite interactions.

Fourth, more attention should be paid to the influence of humans on the trophic cascades that shape host-parasite systems, considering both top-down and bottom-up processes. Humans are currently having major effects on the structure and function of ecosystems through effects on trophic cascades, but the influence that humans are having on these cascades through effects on host-parasite interactions has received surprisingly little attention.

Fifth, we need to spend more effort on synthesizing available research results, for instance through meta-analyses. This would allow us the better estimate which anthropogenic disturbances have the most adverse effects on host-parasite interactions, if the effects are general or idiosyncratic, which host-parasite systems are most sensitive to particular forms of anthropogenic disturbances, and which pathways are most sensitive to human-induced perturbations. These are major goals in our attempt to elucidate the consequences of human activities for ecosystems and in finding solutions to prevent or minimize the negative long-term effects that our activities may have.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to David W. Thieltges and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the manuscript.

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

The work was funded by the Maj and Tor Nessling foundation (to UC).

References

REFERENCES

Adamo, S. A. and Lovett, M. M. (2011). Some like it hot: the effects of climate change on reproduction, immune function and disease resistance in the cricket Gryllus texensis . Journal of Experimental Biology 214, 19972004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aho, J. M., Camp, J. W. and Esch, G. W. (1982). Long-term studies on the population biology of Diplostomulum scheuringi in a thermally altered reservoir. Journal of Parasitology 68, 695708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alizon, S., Hurford, A., Mideo, N. and Van Baalen, M. (2009). Virulence evolution and the trade-off hypothesis: history, current state of affairs and the future. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22, 245259. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01658.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Altizer, S., Dobson, A., Hosseini, P., Hudson, P., Pascual, M. and Rohani, P. (2006). Seasonality and the dynamics of infectious diseases. Ecology Letters 9, 467484. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00879.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Altizer, S., Nunn, C. L. and Lindenfors, P. (2007). Do threatened hosts have fewer parasites? A comparative study in primates. Journal of Animal Ecology 76, 304314. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01214.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alvarez-Pellitero, P. (2008). Fish immunity and parasite infections: from innate immunity to immunoprophylactic prospects. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 126, 171198. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2008.07.013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amundsen, P. A. and Kristoffersen, R. (1990). Infection of whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus L. sl) by Triaenophorus crassus Forel (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea): a case study in parasite control. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68, 11871192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. M. and May, R. (1979). Population biology of infectious diseases: part I. Nature 280, 361367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arkush, K. D., Giese, A. R., Mendonca, H. L., McBride, A. M., Marty, G. D. and Hedrick, P. W. (2002). Resistance to three pathogens in the endangered winter-run chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha): effects of inbreeding and major histocompatibility complex genotypes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59, 966975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneberg, P., Skorping, A., Grenfell, B. and Read, A. F. (1998). Host densities as determinants of abundance in parasite communities. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 265, 12831289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, B. D. (1999). The influence of various factors on immune toxicity assessment of pesticide chemicals. Toxicology Letters 107, 2131. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4274(99)00028-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Best, S. M. and Kerr, P. J. (2000). Coevolution of host and virus: the pathogenesis of virulent and attenuated strains of myxoma virus in resistant and susceptible European rabbits. Virology 267, 3648. doi: 10.1006/viro.1999.0104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biagianti-Risbourg, S. (1990). Contribution à l’étude du foie de juvéniles de muges (Téléostéens, Mugilides), contaminés expérimentalement par l'atrazine (s-triazine herbicide): approche ultrastructurale et métabolique: intérêt en écotoxicologie. Doctoral thesis. Université de Perpignan, France.Google Scholar
Black, G. A. (1983). Taxonomy of a swimbladder nematode, Cystidicola stigmatura (Leidy), and evidence of its decline in the Great Lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 40, 643647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, G. A. (1985). Reproductive output and population biology of Cystidicola stigmatura (Leidy) (Nematoda) in Arctic char, Salvelinus alpinus (L.) (Salmonidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 63, 617622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakley, B., Brousseau, P., Fournier, M. and Voccia, I. (1999). Immunotoxicity of pesticides: a review. Toxicology and Industrial Health 15, 119132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bols, N. C., Brubacher, J. L., Ganassin, R. C. and Lee, L. E. (2001). Ecotoxicology and innate immunity in fish. Developmental and Comparative Immunology 25, 853873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bordes, F. and Morand, S. (2011). The impact of multiple infections on wild animal hosts: a review. Infection Ecology and Epidemiology 1. doi: 10.3402/iee.v1i0.7346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradley, J. and Jackson, J. (2008). Measuring immune system variation to help understand host–pathogen community dynamics. Parasitology 135, 807823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carton, Y. and Sokolowski, M. (1992). Interactions between searching strategies of Drosophila parasitoids and the polymorphic behavior of their hosts. Journal of Insect Behavior 5, 161175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakrabarty, P. and Banerjee, V. (1988). Effect of organophosphorus pesticides on the peripheral hemogram of the fish Channa punctatus . Environment and Ecology 6, 390394.Google Scholar
Choisy, M. and de Roode, J. C. (2010). Mixed infections and the evolution of virulence: effects of resource competition, parasite plasticity, and impaired host immunity. American Naturalist 175, E105E118. doi: 10.1086/651587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christin, M. S., Gendron, A. D., Brousseau, P., Ménard, L., Marcogliese, D. J., Cyr, D., Ruby, S. and Fournier, M. (2003). Effects of agricultural pesticides on the immune system of Rana pipiens and on its resistance to parasitic infection. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 22, 11271133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christin, M., Menard, L., Gendron, A., Ruby, S., Cyr, D., Marcogliese, D., Rollins-Smith, L. and Fournier, M. (2004). Effects of agricultural pesticides on the immune system of Xenopus laevis and Rana pipiens . Aquatic Toxicology 67, 3343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chubb, J. C. (1977). Seasonal occurrence of helminths in freshwater fishes. Part I. Monogenea. Advances in Parasitology 15, 133199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chubb, J. C. (1979). Seasonal occurrence of helminths in freshwater fishes. Part II. Trematoda. Advances in Parasitology 17, 141313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chubb, J. C. (1980). Seasonal occurrence of helminths in freshwater fishes. Part III. Larval Cestoda and Nematoda. Advances in Parasitology 18, 1120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chubb, J. C. (1982). Seasonal occurrence of helminths in freshwater fishes. Part IV. Adult Cestoda, Nematoda and Acanthocephala. Advances in Parasitology 20, 1292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coeurdassier, M., De Vaufleury, A., Scheifler, R., Morhain, E. and Badot, P.-M. (2004). Effects of cadmium on the survival of three life-stages of the freshwater pulmonate Lymnaea stagnalis (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 72, 10831090.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Combes, C. (2001). Parasitism: the Ecology and Evolution of Intimate Interactions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.Google Scholar
Costello, M. J. (2009). How sea lice from salmon farms may cause wild salmonid declines in Europe and North America and be a threat to fishes elsewhere. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 276, 33853394.Google ScholarPubMed
Davies, J. and Davies, D. (2010). Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 74, 417433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desneux, N., Decourtye, A. and Delpuech, J. M. (2007). The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology 52, 81106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobson, A., Lafferty, K. D., Kuris, A. M., Hechinger, R. F. and Jetz, W. (2008). Homage to Linnaeus: how many parasites? How many hosts? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105 (Suppl. 1), 1148211489. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803232105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, R. R., Harris, N. C., Colwell, R. K., Koh, L. P. and Sodhi, N. S. (2009). The sixth mass coextinction: are most endangered species parasites and mutualists? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 276, 30373045. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0413.Google ScholarPubMed
Ebert, D. and Bull, J. J. (2003). Challenging the trade-off model for the evolution of virulence: is virulence management feasible? Trends in Microbiology 11, 1520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebert, D. and Herre, E. (1996). The evolution of parasitic diseases. Parasitology Today 12, 96101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eswarappa, S. M., Estrela, S. and Brown, S. P. (2012). Within-host dynamics of multi-species infections: facilitation, competition and virulence. PLoS ONE 7, e38730. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ewald, P. W. (1983). Host-parasite relations, vectors, and the evolution of disease severity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 14, 465485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnsworth, M. L., Wolfe, L. L., Hobbs, N. T., Burnham, K. P., Williams, E. S., Theobald, D. M., Conner, M. M. and Miller, M. W. (2005). Human land use influences chronic wasting disease prevalence in mule deer. Ecological Applications 15, 119126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenner, F. and Marshall, I. (1957). A comparison of the virulence for European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) of strains of myxoma virus recovered in the field in Australia, Europe and America. Journal of Hygiene 55, 149191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gandon, S., Mackinnon, M., Nee, S. and Read, A. (2003). Imperfect vaccination: some epidemiological and evolutionary consequences. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 270, 11291136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garnett, G. P. and Holmes, E. C. (1996). The ecology of emergent infectious disease. BioScience 46, 127135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrigan, D. and Hedrick, P. W. (2001). Class I MHC polymorphism and evolution in endangered California Chinook and other Pacific salmon. Immunogenetics 53, 483489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giese, A. R. and Hedrick, P. W. (2003). Genetic variation and resistance to a bacterial infection in the endangered Gila topminnow. Animal Conservation 6, 369377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedrick, P. W., Parker, K. M., Miller, E. L. and Miller, P. S. (1999). Major histocompatibility complex variation in the endangered Przewalski's horse. Genetics 152, 17011710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hedrick, P. W., Parker, K. M., Gutiérrez-Espeleta, G. A., Rattink, A. and Lievers, K. (2000). Major histocompatibility complex variation in the Arabian oryx. Evolution 54, 21452151.Google ScholarPubMed
Horrocks, N. P., Matson, K. D. and Tieleman, B. I. (2011). Pathogen pressure puts immune defense into perspective. Integrative and Comparative Biology 51, 563576. doi: 10.1093/icb/icr011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutton, F. W. (1881). Art. XIX. – Notes on some pulmonate Mollusca. Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New Zealand 14, 150158.Google Scholar
Jakobsen, P. J., Johnsen, G. H. and Larsson, P. (1988). Effects of predation risk and parasitism on the feeding ecology, habitat use, and abondance of lacustrine threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 45, 426431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P. T. and Thieltges, D. W. (2010). Diversity, decoys and the dilution effect: how ecological communities affect disease risk. Journal of Experimental Biology 213, 961970. doi: 10.1242/jeb.037721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, P. T., Chase, J. M., Dosch, K. L., Hartson, R. B., Gross, J. A., Larson, D. J., Sutherland, D. R. and Carpenter, S. R. (2007). Aquatic eutrophication promotes pathogenic infection in amphibians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104, 1578115786. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707763104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, P. T. J. and Chase, J. M. (2004). Parasites in the food web: linking amphibian malformations and aquatic eutrophication. Ecology Letters 7, 521526. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00610.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgensen, E. (2010). Ecotoxicology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Keeling, M. and Grenfell, B. (1997). Disease extinction and community size: modeling the persistence of measles. Science 275, 6567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keesing, F., Holt, R. D. and Ostfeld, R. S. (2006). Effects of species diversity on disease risk. Ecology Letters 9, 485498. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00885.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, D. W., Paterson, R. A., Townsend, C. R., Poulin, R. and Tompkins, D. M. (2009 a). Has the introduction of brown trout altered disease patterns in native New Zealand fish? Freshwater Biology 54, 18051818. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02228.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, D. W., Paterson, R. A., Townsend, C. R., Poulin, R. and Tompkins, D. M. (2009 b). Parasite spillback: a neglected concept in invasion ecology? Ecology 90, 20472056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, D. W., Poulin, R., Tompkins, D. M. and Townsend, C. R. (2010). Synergistic effects of glyphosate formulation and parasite infection on fish malformations and survival. Journal of Applied Ecology 47, 498504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, R. (1990). Parasitism in marine fish after chronic exposure to petroleum hydrocarbons in the laboratory and to the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 44, 759763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, R. and Kiceniuk, J. (1988). Effect of petroleum aromatic hydrocarbons on monogeneids parasitizing Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua L. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 41, 94100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Køie, M. (1991). Swimbladder nematodes (Anguillicola spp.) and gill monogeneans (Pseudodactylogyrus spp.) parasitic on the European eel (Anguilla anguilla). Journal du Conseil: ICES Journal of Marine Science 47, 391398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konkel, M. E. and Tilly, K. (2000). Temperature-regulated expression of bacterial virulence genes. Microbes and Infection 2, 157166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kopp, K. and Jokela, J. (2007). Resistant invaders can convey benefits to native species. Oikos 116, 295301. doi: 10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.15290.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krkošek, M., Ford, J. S., Morton, A., Lele, S., Myers, R. A. and Lewis, M. A. (2007). Declining wild salmon populations in relation to parasites from farm salmon. Science 318, 17721775.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kunttu, H. M., Valtonen, E. T., Jokinen, E. I. and Suomalainen, L.-R. (2009). Saprophytism of a fish pathogen as a transmission strategy. Epidemics 1, 96100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lafferty, K. D. (2009). The ecology of climate change and infectious diseases. Ecology 90, 888900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lafferty, K. D. and Kuris, A. M. (2005). Parasitism and environmental disturbances. In Parasitism and Ecosystems (ed. Thomas, F., Guégan, J.-F. and Renaud, F.), pp. 113123. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, E. E., Campbell, J. F. and Sukhdeo, M. V. K. (2002). The Behavioural Ecology of Parasites. CABI, Wallingford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsitch, M. and Moxon, E. R. (1997). Virulence and transmissibility of pathogens: what is the relationship? Trends in Microbiology 5, 3137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Louhi, K. R., Karvonen, A., Rellstab, C. and Jokela, J. (2010). Is the population genetic structure of complex life cycle parasites determined by the geographic range of the most motile host? Infection, Genetics and Evolution 10, 12711277. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2010.08.013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyles, A. M. and Dobson, A. P. (1993). Infectious disease and intensive management: population dynamics, threatened hosts, and their parasites. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 24, 315326.Google Scholar
Macnab, V. i. and Barber, I. (2012). Some (worms) like it hot: fish parasites grow faster in warmer water, and alter host thermal preferences. Global Change Biology 18, 15401548. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02595.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcogliese, D. J. (2001). Implications of climate change for parasitism of animals in the aquatic environment. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79, 13311352. doi: 10.1139/cjz-79-8-1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcogliese, D. J. (2004). Parasites: small players with crucial roles in the ecological theater. Ecohealth 1, 151164. doi: 10.1007/s10393-004-0028-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcogliese, D. J., Goater, T. M. and Esch, G. W. (1990). Crepidostomum cooperi (Allocreadidae) in the burrowing mayfly, Hexagenia limbata (Ephemeroptera) related to trophic status of a lake. American Midland Naturalist 124, 309317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, I. and Fenner, F. (1960). Studies in the epidemiology of infectious myxomatosis of rabbits: VII. The virulence of strains of myxoma virus recovered from Australian wild rabbits between 1951 and 1959. Journal of Hygiene 58, 485488.Google ScholarPubMed
Martin, L. B., Hopkins, W. A., Mydlarz, L. D. and Rohr, J. R. (2010). The effects of anthropogenic global changes on immune functions and disease resistance. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1195, 129148. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05454.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Massad, E. (1987). Transmission rates and the evolution of pathogenicity. Evolution 41, 11271130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
May, R. M. and Anderson, R. M. (1979). Population biology of infectious diseases: part II. Nature 280, 455461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mbora, D. N. and McPeek, M. A. (2009). Host density and human activities mediate increased parasite prevalence and richness in primates threatened by habitat loss and fragmentation. Journal of Animal Ecology 78, 210218. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01481.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mbora, D. and Meikle, D. (2004 a). The value of unprotected habitat in conserving endangered species: case study of the Tana River red colobus in eastern Kenya. Biological Conservation 120, 9199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mbora, D. N. M. and Meikle, D. B. (2004 b). Forest fragmentation and the distribution, abundance and conservation of the Tana River red colobus (Procolobus rufomitratus). Biological Conservation 118, 6777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCallum, H. and Dobson, A. (2002). Disease, habitat fragmentation and conservation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 269, 20412049. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2079.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mennerat, A., Nilsen, F., Ebert, D. and Skorping, A. (2010). Intensive farming: evolutionary implications for parasites and pathogens. Evolutionary Biology 37, 5967. doi: 10.1007/s11692-010-9089-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mennerat, A., Hamre, L., Ebert, D., Nilsen, F., Davidova, M. and Skorping, A. (2012). Life history and virulence are linked in the ectoparasitic salmon louse Lepeophtheirus salmonis . Journal of Evolutionary Biology 25, 856861. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02474.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mideo, N. (2009). Parasite adaptations to within-host competition. Trends in Parasitology 25, 261268. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2009.03.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, S. E., Rogers, E. S., Little, T. J. and Read, A. F. (2005). Host-parasite and genotype-by-environment interactions: temperature modifies potential for selection by a sterilizing pathogen. Evolution 59, 7080.Google ScholarPubMed
Møller, A. P. (2010). Host-parasite interactions and vectors in the barn swallow in relation to climate change. Global Change Biology 16, 11581170. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02035.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morand, S. and Poulin, R. (1998). Density, body mass and parasite species richness of terrestrial mammals. Evolutionary Ecology 12, 717727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravec, F. (1996). Aquatic invertebrates (snails) as new paratenic hosts of Anguillicola crassus (Nematoda: Dracunculoidea) and the role of paratenic hosts in the life cycle of this parasite. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 27, 237239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravec, F. and Škoriková, B. (1998). Amphibians and larvae of aquatic insects as new paratenic hosts of Anguillicola crassus (Nematoda: Dracunculoidea), a swimbladder parasite of eels. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 34, 217222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morley, N., Crane, M. and Lewis, J. (2002). Toxicity of cadmium and zinc to cercarial tail loss in Diplostomum spathaceum (Trematoda: Diplostomidae). Parasitology 125, 293301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morley, N. J., Crane, M. and Lewis, J. W. (2005). Toxicity of cadmium and zinc mixtures to cercarial tail loss in Diplostomum spathaceum (Trematoda: Diplostomidae). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 60, 5360. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2003.12.018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munson, L., Terio, K. A., Kock, R., Mlengeya, T., Roelke, M. E., Dubovi, E., Summers, B., Sinclair, A. R. and Packer, C. (2008). Climate extremes promote fatal co-infections during canine distemper epidemics in African lions. PLoS ONE 3, e2545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, A. G. and Peeler, E. J. (2005). A framework for understanding the potential for emerging diseases in aquaculture. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 67, 223235. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.10.012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ostfeld, R. S. (2009). Climate change and the distribution and intensity of infectious diseases. Ecology 90, 903905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ouellet, M., Mikaelian, I., Pauli, B. D., Rodrigue, J. and Green, D. M. (2005). Historical evidence of widespread chytrid infection in North American amphibian populations. Conservation Biology 19, 14311440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palumbi, S. R. (2001). Humans as the world's greatest evolutionary force. Science 293, 17861790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paterson, R. A., Townsend, C. R., Poulin, R. and Tompkins, D. M. (2011). Introduced brown trout alter native acanthocephalan infections in native fish. Journal of Animal Ecology 80, 990998. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01834.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paull, S. H. and Johnson, P. T. J. (2011). High temperature enhances host pathology in a snail–trematode system: possible consequences of climate change for the emergence of disease. Freshwater Biology 56, 767778. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02547.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietrock, M. and Marcogliese, D. J. (2003). Free-living endohelminth stages: at the mercy of environmental conditions. Trends in Parasitology 19, 293299. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4922(03)00117-x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulin, R. (2003). Information about transmission opportunities triggers a life-history switch in a parasite. Evolution 57, 28992903.Google Scholar
Poulin, R. (2006). Global warming and temperature-mediated increases in cercarial emergence in trematode parasites. Parasitology 132, 143151. doi: 10.1017/S0031182005008693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prenter, J., MacNeil, C., Dick, J. T. A. and Dunn, A. M. (2004). Roles of parasites in animal invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19, 385390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pulkkinen, K., Suomalainen, L. R., Read, A. F., Ebert, D., Rintamaki, P. and Valtonen, E. T. (2010). Intensive fish farming and the evolution of pathogen virulence: the case of columnaris disease in Finland. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 277, 593600. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1659.Google ScholarPubMed
Purse, B. V., Mellor, P. S., Rogers, D. J., Samuel, A. R., Mertens, P. P. and Baylis, M. (2005). Climate change and the recent emergence of bluetongue in Europe. Nature Reviews Microbiology 3, 171181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rachowicz, L. J., Hero, J., Alford, R. A., Taylor, J. W., Morgan, J. A. T., Vredenburg, V. T., Collins, J. P. and Briggs, C. J. (2005). The novel and endemic pathogen hypotheses: competing explanations for the origin of emerging infectious diseases of wildlife. Conservation Biology 19, 14411448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffel, T. R., Martin, L. B. and Rohr, J. R. (2008). Parasites as predators: unifying natural enemy ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23, 610618. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.06.015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reiter, P. (2001). Climate change and mosquito-borne disease. Environmental Health Perspectives 109 (Suppl. 1), 141.Google ScholarPubMed
Rigaud, T., Perrot-Minnot, M. J. and Brown, M. J. (2010). Parasite and host assemblages: embracing the reality will improve our knowledge of parasite transmission and virulence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 277, 36933702. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1163.Google ScholarPubMed
Rogers, D. J. and Randolph, S. E. (2006). Climate change and vector-borne diseases. Advances in Parasitology 62, 345381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rohr, J. R. and McCoy, K. A. (2010). A qualitative meta-analysis reveals consistent effects of atrazine on freshwater fish and amphibians. Environmental Health Perspectives 118, 2032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rohr, J. R., Swan, A., Raffel, T. R. and Hudson, P. J. (2009). Parasites, info-disruption, and the ecology of fear. Oecologia 159, 447454. doi: 10.1007/s00442-008-1208-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, E. and Ben-Haim, Y. (2002). Microbial diseases of corals and global warming. Environmental Microbiology 4, 318326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, E. and Falkovitz, L. (2004). The Vibrio shiloi/Oculina patagonica model system of coral bleaching. Annual Review of Microbiology 58, 143159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rymuszka, A., Siwicki, A. K. and Sieroslawska, A. (2007). Determination of the modulatory potential of atrazine on selected functions of immune cells isolated from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Central European Journal of Immunology 32, 97100.Google Scholar
Schuurman, H. J., Frieke Kuper, C. and Vos, J. G. (1994). Histopathology of the immune system as a tool to assess immunotoxicity. Toxicology 86, 187212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schweiger, O., Settele, J., Kudrna, O., Klotz, S. and Kühn, I. (2008). Climate change can cause spatial mismatch of trophically interacting species. Ecology 89, 34723479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shephard, K. L. (1994). Functions for fish mucus. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 4, 401429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sih, A. (2013). Understanding variation in behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change: a conceptual overview. Animal Behaviour 85, 10771088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonnenholzner, J. I., Lafferty, K. D. and Ladah, L. B. (2011). Food webs and fishing affect parasitism of the sea urchin Eucidaris galapagensis in the Galápagos. Ecology 92, 22762284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sures, B. (2006). How parasitism and pollution affect the physiological homeostasis of aquatic hosts. Journal of Helminthology 80, 151157. doi: 10.1079/joh2006346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sures, B. (2008). Host-parasite interactions in polluted environments. Journal of Fish Biology 73, 21332142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telfer, S., Bown, K. J., Sekules, R., Begon, M., Hayden, T. and Birtles, R. (2005). Disruption of a host-parasite system following the introduction of an exotic host species. Parasitology 130, 661668. doi: 10.1017/s0031182005007250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thieltges, D. W. and Poulin, R. (2008). Parasites and pathogens: avoidance. In Encyclopedia of Life Sciences (ELS). John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
Thieltges, D. W., Jensen, K. T. and Poulin, R. (2008 a). The role of biotic factors in the transmission of free-living endohelminth stages. Parasitology 135, 407426. doi: 10.1017/S0031182007000248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thieltges, D. W., Reise, K., Prinz, K. and Jensen, K. T. (2008 b). Invaders interfere with native parasite–host interactions. Biological Invasions 11, 14211429. doi: 10.1007/s10530-008-9350-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, F., Brown, S. P., Sukhdeo, M. V. and Renaud, F. (2002). Understanding parasite strategies: a state-dependent approach? Trends in Parasitology 18, 387390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, J. N. (1994). The Coevolutionary Process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J. N. (2005). The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, J. F. and Crompton, D. W. T. (1992). Infectivity of plerocercoids of Schistocephalus solidus (Cestoda: Ligulidae) and fecundity of the adults in an experimental definitive host, Gallus gallus . Journal of Parasitology 78, 10491054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolonen, A. and Kjellman, J. (2001). Post-stocking perturbations in a population of subarctic whitefish, Coregonus lavaretus (L.): effects on growth, condition and cestode infection. Hydrobiologia 445, 5766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torchin, M. E. and Lafferty, K. D. (2008). Escape from parasites. In Marine Bioinvasions: Ecology, Conservation and Management Perspectives (ed. Rilov, G. and Crooks, J.), pp. 203214. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
Torchin, M. E., Lafferty, K. D. and Kuris, A. M. (2002). Parasites and marine invasions. Parasitology 124, S137S151. doi: 10.1017/s0031182002001506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torchin, M. E., Lafferty, K. D., Dobson, A. P., McKenzie, V. J. and Kuris, A. M. (2003). Introduced species and their missing parasites. Nature 421, 628630. doi: 10.1038/nature01346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tschirren, B., Bischoff, L. L., Saladin, V. and Richner, H. (2007). Host condition and host immunity affect parasite fitness in a bird–ectoparasite system. Functional Ecology 21, 372378. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01235.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tseng, M. (2006). Interactions between the parasite's previous and current environment mediate the outcome of parasite infection. American Naturalist 168, 565571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, B. L. II, Kasperson, R. E., Meyer, W. B., Dow, K. M., Golding, D., Kasperson, J. X., Mitchell, R. C. and Ratick, S. J. (1990). Two types of global environmental change: definitional and spatial-scale issues in their human dimensions. Global Environmental Change 1, 1422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wajnberg, E., Bernstein, C. and Van Alphen, J. (2008). Behavioural Ecology of Insect Parasitoids: from Theoretical Approaches to Field Applications. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, J. R. and Lafferty, K. D. (2004). The elusive baseline of marine disease: are diseases in ocean ecosystems increasing? PLoS Biology 2, e120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weldon, C., Du Preez, L. H., Hyatt, A. D., Muller, R. and Speare, R. (2004). Origin of amphibian chytrid fungus. Emerging Infectious Diseases 10, 21002105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wieczkowski, J. and Mbora, D. (2000). Increasing threats to the conservation of endemic endangered primates and forests of the lower Tana River, Kenya. African Primates 4, 3240.Google Scholar
Wolinska, J. and King, K. C. (2009). Environment can alter selection in host-parasite interactions. Trends in Parasitology 25, 236244. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2009.02.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, C. L., Lafferty, K. D. and Micheli, F. (2010). Fishing out marine parasites? Impacts of fishing on rates of parasitism in the ocean. Ecology Letters 13, 761775. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01467.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, J., Neher, D. A., Fu, S., Li, Z. A. and Wang, K. (2013). Non-target effects of herbicides on soil nematode assemblages. Pest Management Science 69, 679684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. An outline of the pathways through which human-induced environmental changes influence host-parasite interactions. Alterations in the environment can influence the first step in a host-parasite interaction, the encounter rate between hosts and parasites, i.e. the encounter filter, or the second step, the compatibility between the host and the parasite, i.e. the compatibility filter (adjusted from Combes, 1991). A human-induced environmental change, such as pollution, can influence both filters and several mechanisms within the filters, but for simplicity only a few pathways are presented.

Figure 1

Table 1. Examples of anthropogenic disturbances affecting host-parasite interactions. The disturbances affect various factors that mediate the interaction between hosts and parasites, through their effects on the two filters: host encounters and host-parasite compatibility

Figure 2

Fig. 2. An example of a complex life-cycle of a parasite. The life-cycle of the digenetic trematode Ribeiroia ondatrae involves both free-living stages, which are directly exposed to environmental perturbations, and parasitic stages, which rely on other organisms for development and reproduction and, hence, are indirectly influenced by effects on these organisms. The miracidia larvae infect aquatic snails, in which they develop to sporocysts. The sporocysts produce cercariae asexually, which are released into the water where they search for amphibians to infect. In the frogs, the cercariae develop into metacercariae, which cause malformations in amphibians. Predation by birds transmits the metacercariae to the definitive bird host, where the metacercariae mature and reproduce sexually. Anthropogenic disturbances that affect at least one of the different stages can compromise the completion of the whole life-cycle of the parasite.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. The dilution of infection risks through increases in the density of incompatible hosts. Individuals of the white host population carry one parasite species able to differentially infect other host populations in the community. Black hosts are compatible hosts for the parasite (i.e. sources for the parasite population), while grey hosts are incompatible hosts (i.e. sinks for the parasite population). Although the population of white hosts remains constant under the three community structures, alterations in the composition of the host assemblage affect infection risk for the white hosts.