Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T15:51:40.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Addendum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2011

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Addendum
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Using multilevel Poisson modelling, we previously estimated the proportion of variance in the incidence of non-affective psychoses in Southeast London due to neighbourhood-level effects to be 23% (95% CI 9.9–42.2) (Kirkbride et al. Reference Kirkbride, Morgan, Fearon, Dazzan, Murray and Jones2007). This estimate was calculated by taking the raw parameter estimate from the multilevel Poisson model and applying the formula for the standard calculation of the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) used for probit models. This formula had been previously used in a similar way for Poisson models (van Os et al. Reference van Os, Driessen, Gunther and Delespaul2000), but a recent advance in statistical modelling suggests that this method of calculating the ICC leads to an over-estimate of the proportion of variance attributable to neighbourhood-level factors in the Poisson case (Zammit et al. Reference Zammit, Lewis, Rasbash, Dalman, Gustafsson and Allebeck2010). Modelling of ICC in hierarchical Poisson models is not straightforward and unlike the probit or logistic case, it is not possible to compute a single summary ICC. Rather, the ICC will vary according to the underlying stratification of data by population subgroup. To provide interpretable estimates from our findings, and consistent with the methods described in another recent publication (Zammit et al. Reference Zammit, Lewis, Rasbash, Dalman, Gustafsson and Allebeck2010), we therefore refitted our previously reported models using logistic regression, which produces comparable measures of relative risk to the Poisson distribution provided the disease, like schizophrenia, is rare (Greenland & Thomas, Reference Greenland and Thomas1982). From these, we were able to re-estimate the ICC at the neighbourhood level in Southeast London, using the latent variable approach recommended by Browne et al. (Reference Browne, Subramanian, Jones and Goldstein2005) :

{\rm ICC \equals }{{V_{n} } \over {V_{n} \plus \pi ^{\setnum{2}} \sol 3}}

where V n is the variance between neighbourhoods and π2/3 is the variance between individuals.

In a logistic model of schizophrenia incidence adjusted for age, sex and ethnicity (corresponding to the Poisson model from which we originally reported variance at the neighbourhood level (see Table 3 in Kirkbride et al. Reference Kirkbride, Morgan, Fearon, Dazzan, Murray and Jones2007), we re-estimated the ICC (variance attributable to the neighbourhood level) to be 10.7% (95% CI 4.4–23.5). Although lower than previously reported, this figure is consistent with other estimates (Zammit et al. Reference Zammit, Lewis, Rasbash, Dalman, Gustafsson and Allebeck2010) and remained highly statistically significant [χ2(1)=14.93, p<0.001]. It also does not affect the interpretation of previously published rate ratios or their effect sizes, which show that in Southeast London there is strong evidence that aspects of the neighbourhood social environment are associated with the incidence of schizophrenia, after adjustment for individual level risk.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dr Stan Zammit and the late Professor Jon Rasbash for their advice and expertise in this area.

Declaration of Interest

Professor Robin Murray is joint editor of Psychological Medicine.

References

Browne, WJ, Subramanian, SV, Jones, K, Goldstein, H (2005). Variance partitioning in multilevel logistic models that exhibit overdispersion. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society 168, 599613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenland, S, Thomas, DC (1982). On the need for the rare disease assumption in case-control studies. American Journal of Epidemiology 116, 547553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkbride, JB, Morgan, C, Fearon, P, Dazzan, P, Murray, RM, Jones, PB (2007). Neighbourhood-level effects on psychoses: re-examining the role of context. Psychological Medicine 37, 14131425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Os, J, Driessen, G, Gunther, N, Delespaul, P (2000). Neighbourhood variation in incidence of schizophrenia. Evidence for person-environment interaction. British Journal of Psychiatry 176, 243248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zammit, S, Lewis, G, Rasbash, J, Dalman, C, Gustafsson, J-E, Allebeck, P (2010). Individuals, schools, and neighborhood: a multilevel longitudinal study of variation in incidence of psychotic disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry 67, 914922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed