Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T15:40:51.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Supplementing with vitamin C the diet of honeybees (Apis mellifera carnica) parasitized with Varroa destructor: effects on antioxidative status

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2014

MAREK FARJAN
Affiliation:
Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Oczapowskiego 1A Str., 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
ELŻBIETA ŁOPIEŃSKA-BIERNAT
Affiliation:
Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Oczapowskiego 1A Str., 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
ZBIGNIEW LIPIŃSKI
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of Polish Academy of Sciences, Bydgoska Str. 1/8, 10-243 Olsztyn, Poland
MAŁGORZATA DMITRYJUK
Affiliation:
Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Oczapowskiego 1A Str., 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
KRYSTYNA ŻÓŁTOWSKA*
Affiliation:
Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Oczapowskiego 1A Str., 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
*
* Corresponding author. Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Oczapowskiego 1A Str., 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland. E-mail: k.zoltowska@uwm.edu.pl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

We studied a total of eight developmental stages of capped brood and newly emerged workers of Apis mellifera carnica colonies naturally parasitized with Varroa destructor. During winter and early spring four colonies were fed syrup containing 1·8 mg vitamin C kg−1 (ascorbic acid group; group AA) while four colonies were fed syrup without the vitamin C (control group C). Selected elements of the antioxidative system were analysed including total antioxidant status (TAS), glutathione content and antioxidative enzyme activities (superoxide dismutase, catalase, peroxidase and glutathione S-transferase). Body weight, protein content and indices of infestation were also determined. The prevalence (8·11%) and intensity (1·15 parasite per bee) of the infestation were lower in group AA compared with group C (11·3% and 1·21, respectively). Changes in the indicators of antioxidative stress were evidence for the strengthening of the antioxidative system in the brood by administration of vitamin C. In freshly emerged worker bees of group AA, despite the infestation, protein content, TAS, and the activity of all antioxidative enzymes had significantly higher values in relation to group C.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

INTRODUCTION

Antioxidant levels and the activity of antioxidative enzymes, which prevent cell damage caused by oxidation, are important factors determining the good health of an organism (Clarkson and Thompson, Reference Clarkson and Thompson2000). Excessive oxidative reactions (oxidative stress) are the basis or result of many diseases including parasitosis (Hadaś and Stankiewicz, Reference Hadaś and Stankiewicz1998; Mishra, Reference Mishra2007; Sorci and Faivre, Reference Sorci and Faivre2009; Halliwell, Reference Halliwell2011). In honeybees, the symptoms of oxidative stress have been observed in drone prepupae (PP) parasitized with Varroa destructor (Lipiński and Żółtowska, Reference Lipiński and Żółtowska2005).

Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae) is a haematophagous mite and one of the most damaging pests of honeybees. The condition caused by varroa mite – varrosis – considerably decreases the productivity of beekeeping (Murilhas, Reference Murilhas2002; Van Engelsdorp et al. Reference Van Engelsdorp, Evans, Saegerman, Mullin, Haubruge, Nguyen, Frazier, Frazier, Cox-Foster, Chen, Underwood, Tarpy and Pettis2009). The mite parasitizes all of the stages of the capped brood and adult bees. The infestation negatively influences the immunity and longevity of bees (Gliński and Jarosz, Reference Gliński and Jarosz1988, Reference Gliński and Jarosz1992; Yang and Cox-Foster, Reference Yang and Cox-Foster2005). The following symptoms have been observed during varrosis: body weight reduction, decrease in fertility, negative changes in the immune system and deformations of wings and limbs (Sammataro et al. Reference Sammataro, Gerson and Needham2000; Yang and Cox-Foster, Reference Yang and Cox-Foster2005). Varrosis is often accompanied by dangerous bacterial, viral and fungal infections (Francis et al. Reference Francis, Nielsen and Kryger2013). In most cases, untreated varrosis leads to the collapse of the whole colony within 3–4 years (Stevenson et al. Reference Stevenson, Benard, Bolger and Morris2005). Commonly used acaricides are becoming less and less effective, as the parasite has developed resistance against them (Lipiński and Szubstarski, Reference Lipiński and Szubstarski2007; Maggi et al. Reference Maggi, Ruffinengo, Mendoza, Ojeda, Ramallo, Floris and Eguaras2011). These compounds also affect the quality of bee products and their safety for consumers (Karazafiris et al. Reference Karazafiris, Tananaki, Menkissoglu-Spiroudi and Hrasyvoulou2008; Wu et al. Reference Wu, Anelli and Sheppard2011). Therefore, the search for effective and safe ways of controlling varrosis is critical (Rosenkranz et al. Reference Rosenkranz, Aumeier and Ziegelmann2010).

Prevention methods alleviating the effects of oxidative stress can support the protective forces of an organism. One of these methods may be administration of exogenous compounds with antioxidative characteristics (Clarkson and Thompson, Reference Clarkson and Thompson2000; Berger, Reference Berger2005; Mishra, Reference Mishra2007) such as vitamin C (ascorbic acid, AA), a natural antioxidant. Oral application of AA has no lethal effect on Apis mellifera carnica worker bees (Harz et al. Reference Harz, Müller and Rademacher2010). The results of our previous study showed that supplementation of the diet of wintering honeybees with AA increased the efficacy of their antioxidative system. As a result, the winter losses in colonies receiving AA was 33% lower compared with those not receiving AA (Farjan et al. Reference Farjan, Dmitryjuk, Lipiński, Łopieńska-Biernat and Żółtowska2012). AA in the used doses did not show any harmful effects, and even positively influenced carbohydrate metabolism, particularly in the youngest larval stages of workers (Farjan, unpublished data). Moreover, AA is relatively cheap and a safe diet supplement (Harz et al. Reference Harz, Müller and Rademacher2010), and its application in beekeeping is very simple.

The main goal of this study was to validate the use of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) administered during autumn and early spring to honeybees exposed to varroa mites by comparison of changes in the antioxidative status of parasitized broods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The material originated from eight colonies headed by sister queens of Apis mellifera derived from Carnolian honeybees naturally parasitized with V. destructor situated 20 km from Olsztyn, Poland. The field experiment was carried out at the same time (from September 2007 to May 2008) and the same way as described by Farjan et al. (Reference Farjan, Dmitryjuk, Lipiński, Łopieńska-Biernat and Żółtowska2012). Briefly, four of the eight colonies were fed with a sugar–water (3:1) syrup supplemented with vitamin C (ascorbic acid, Biofactor; Poland, group AA) at a concentration of 1·8 mg kg−1 syrup. The remaining four colonies received pure syrup as a control (group C). Feeding began in September 2007 to enable bees to hoard the winter stores (13 litres per colony) and a second feeding took place on 1 March 2008.

On 10 May 2008, honeycomb sections were collected from all the colonies. Sealed broods were carefully isolated from honeycomb cells. Simultaneously, the material was evaluated in parasitological terms. All capped cells of the honeycombs were opened, isolated from the brood and the cells’ interiors were searched for the presence of the parasite. The brood was divided, based on morphological features (Jay, Reference Jay1962, Reference Jay1963) in eight stages of development: 6 days old (L6); cocoon-spinning larvae (L7); prepupae (PP); pupae with white eyes (P1); pupae with pale-pink eyes (P2); pupae with pink eyes (P3); pupae with brown eyes and yellow thorax (P4); pupae with black eyes and dark thorax (P5). Freshly emerged workers (A) were also examined. The samples (n = 15) were collected for each stage consisting of three individuals in each sample. The samples were rinsed in 0·9% NaCl, carefully dried on filter paper, and weighed. The material was stored at −70 °C until further analysis.

The preparation of honeybee extracts and analysis were carried out in the same way as in our earlier study (Farjan et al. Reference Farjan, Dmitryjuk, Lipiński, Łopieńska-Biernat and Żółtowska2012). Protein content was analysed using the Bradford (Reference Bradford1976) method. Glutathione (GSH) concentration was measured according to Ellman (Reference Ellman1959). Total antioxidant status (TAS) was assayed with use of a Randox Laboratories Ltd kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. Results were calculated as Trolox (a water-soluble analogue of vitamin E) equivalents/100 mg fresh weight.

The activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) was measured according to Podczasy and Wei (Reference Podczasy and Wei1988). Catalase (CAT) was determined according to Aebi (Reference Aebi and Bergmeyer1983). Peroxidase (POX) activity was measured according to Chance and Maehly (Reference Chance, Maehly, Colowick and Kaplan1955), and was expressed in international units (U). Glutathione S-transferase (GST) was assayed by the Papadopoulos et al. (Reference Papadopoulos, Polemitou, Yiangou and Tananaki2004) method. All the enzymatic activities were calculated per mg protein.

Statistical analysis

Statistical significance was determined by use of the Student's t-test and differences between stage's means in group C and AA were considered significant when P < 0·05.

RESULTS

The mean prevalence of infestation with V. destructor was 11·32% in group C, while in group AA it was 8·11%. The mean intensity of infestation was 1·21 mites/one parasitized individual in group C and 1·15 in group AA.

Ascorbic acid did not significantly influence the brood body weight (Fig. 1A). However, the mean weight of parasitized freshly emerging workers from group C was about 10% lower than in group AA. In the capped larvae the level of proteins from group V was higher than in group AA. Then until the P5 stage there were no differences between the groups. The pupae of the P5 stage and freshly emerged worker bees of the AA group had a higher protein content than those of group C (Fig. 1B).

Fig. 1. Body weight (A) and protein content (B) in the developmental stages of parasitized honeybee worker broods (mean±s.d.). C, group without supplementation with vitamin C; AA, group after supplementation with vitamin C (ascorbic acid); L, larval stages; PP, prepupae; P, pupae; A, newly emerged workers. *Significant difference between means of groups C and AA (P < 0·05).

In group AA higher total antioxidative capacity was observed in comparison with group C. Differences between the means of both groups were significant, starting from the P1 stage (Fig. 2A). However GSH level was similar in both groups (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2. Total antioxidant status (TAS) (A) and glutathione (GSH) (B) content in developmental stages of parasitized honeybee worker broods (mean±s.d.). C, group without supplementation with vitamin C; AA, group after supplementation with vitamin C (ascorbic acid); L, larval stages; PP, prepupae; P, pupae, A, newly emerged workers. *Significant difference between means of groups C and AA (P < 0·05).

In the pupae of group AA, the activity of SOD was only slightly higher than in the brood not receiving AA. The difference was statistically significant only for the P5 and imago stages (Fig. 3A). The activity of CAT was higher in the L7, PP, P1, P5 and imago stages of the AA group than in the group without supplementation (Fig. 3B). Similar results were found for POX and GST, but significant differences were evident only from the P2 pupa stage (Fig. 3C and D).

Fig. 3. Activity of antioxidative enzymes in the developmental stages of parasitized honeybee worker broods (mean±s.d.). C, group without supplementation with vitamin C; AA, group after supplementation with vitamin C (ascorbic acid); L, larval stages; PP, prepupae; P, pupae, A, newly emerged workers. (A) Superoxide dismutase (SOD); (B) catalase (CAT); (C) peroxidase (POX); (D) glutathione S-transferase (GST). *Significant difference between means of group C and AA (P < 0·05).

DISCUSSION

Although the bees from the group receiving vitamin C were still parasitized with varroa mites, the prevalence of parasitism was 30%; lower compared with the control group. In addition, the average intensity of infection was lower in group AA compared with the group not receiving AA. The values of these indicators suggest that the administration of AA to bees has a positive effect. Even a small reduction in the number of mites in the colony may be significant (Wilkinson and Smith, Reference Wilkinson and Smith2002). It appears that the decrease in the prevalence of parasitism of broods resulted from the properties of AA. Other organic acids, with similar redox properties, such as formic acid, oxalic acid and lactic acid, have been successfully used as acaricides (Rosenkranz et al. Reference Rosenkranz, Aumeier and Ziegelmann2010). However, these acids have demonstrated toxic effects on bees with longer periods of oral administration (8 days), even at low doses (1000 parts per million) (Ebert et al. Reference Ebert, Kevan, Bishop, Kevan and Downer2007). AA at the dose used in this study was not toxic for bees. On the contrary, AA administration has been found to decrease winter losses of bees and support the health of the colony (Farjan et al. Reference Farjan, Dmitryjuk, Lipiński, Łopieńska-Biernat and Żółtowska2012).

The results for newly emerged workers were compared with our earlier data on non-infected honeybees (Farjan et al. Reference Farjan, Dmitryjuk, Lipiński, Łopieńska-Biernat and Żółtowska2012) in Table 1. The combined data showed that V. destructor parasitism did not have a significant influence on the weight of the worker brood. The observed slight reduction in body weight in the parasitized bees was in accordance with previous reports (Bowen-Walker and Gunn, Reference Bowen-Walker and Gunn2001; Duay et al. Reference Duay, De Jong and Engels2003; Żółtowska et al. Reference Żółtowska, Lipiński and Dmitryjuk2005). Importantly, the protein content in newly emerged bees from the colonies receiving AA was significantly higher than in the control group (Fig. 1B). This can be considered a secondary benefit of the supplementation with AA of the winter diet of honeybees.

Table 1. Influence of varrosis and supplementation of diet with vitamin C on body weight, protein concentration and antioxidants of newly emerged honeybee workers (mean±s.d.)

*Different lower-case letters indicate significant difference between means of the C and AA groups based on Student's t-test (P < 0·05). †Data from Farjan et al. (Reference Farjan, Dmitryjuk, Lipiński, Łopieńska-Biernat and Żółtowska2012). TAS, total antioxidant status; GSH, glutathione; SOD, superoxide dismutase; CAT, catalase; POX, peroxidase; GST, glutathione S-transferase.

It is known that parasitic disease increases free radical production in the host (Clarkson and Thompson, Reference Clarkson and Thompson2000; Sorci and Faivre, Reference Sorci and Faivre2009). It can result from inflammatory and non-inflammatory reactions of the host to the infestation. The data from Table 1 show that varrosis was accompanied by a slight increase in overall ability to scavenge free radicals, and significant reduction in the activity of two antioxidant enzymes. However, a considerable increase in TAS occurred in the parasitized bees receiving vitamin C compared with solely parasitized bees (Table 1, Fig. 2A). Among the analysed elements of the non-enzymatic antioxidative system, it was GSH that responded most intensively to the infestation stress (Table 1). This was not surprising because GSH is known to be a central element that mediates in many oxidation and reduction reactions (Ghezzi, Reference Ghezzi2011). In parasitized bees, the level of GSH was almost constant and independent of vitamin C administration (Fig. 2B). The lower activity of the two antioxidant enzymes CAT and SOD in the parasitized bees could be concerning. However, AA counteracted the decrease in SOD and CAT activity induced by the varroa mite parasitism in workers (Table 1, Fig. 3A and B). This also confirmed the validity of enriching the diet of bees exposed to varrosis with this antioxidant. The infestation did not significantly influence the activity of POX and GST (Table 1). The statistically significant increase in the activity of both enzymes was noted for the parasitized pupae and newly emerged bees of the AA group compared with the C group (Fig. 3C and D). This phenomenon is particularly important in the case of GST, because it acts not only as an antioxidative enzyme but also participates in phase II of detoxification (Kostaropoulos et al. Reference Kostaropoulos, Mantzari and Papadopoulos1996). In insects, this enzyme is involved in the inactivation of toxic compounds present in the environment, including pesticides (Oakeshott et al. Reference Oakeshott, Johnson, Berebaum, Ranson, Cristino and Claudianos2010; Sau et al. Reference Sau, Pellizzari-Tregno, Valentino, Federici and Cauccuri2010). This suggests that supplementation of the diet of wintering bees with vitamin C not only augments the efficiency of the antioxidative system, but also may lead to an increased ability to remove toxic and undesired metabolites which may appear during varrosis.

In conclusion, V. destructor parasitism has a negative influence on the antioxidative system of the developing honeybee brood. For these reasons, the supplementation of the diet of bees before the winter period with vitamin C may be recommended. The freshly emerged workers, despite the infestation, were in a better condition than those that did not receive AA (Table 1). This was confirmed by a significantly higher protein content, increase in TAS and by the elevated level of the activities of all the antioxidative enzymes studied. This phenomenon is very important because the ability of honeybees to defend against reactive oxygen species seems to be severely limited compared with other insects (Claudianos et al. Reference Claudianos, Ranson, Johanson, Biswas, Schuler, Barenbaum, Feyereisen and Oakeshott2006; Corona and Robinson, Reference Corona and Robinson2006; Oakeshott et al. Reference Oakeshott, Johnson, Berebaum, Ranson, Cristino and Claudianos2010). However, the present study was a preliminary study, requiring confirmation in field trials on a broader scale.

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

This work was supported by the Polish Ministry of Sciences and High Education (grant number NN 308282933).

References

REFERENCES

Aebi, H. E. (1983). Catalase. In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, Vol. 3 (ed. Bergmeyer, H. V.), pp. 277282. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, Germany.Google Scholar
Berger, M. M. (2005). Can oxidative damage be treated nutritionally? Clinical Nutrition 24, 172183. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.10.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowen-Walker, P. L. and Gunn, A. (2001). The effect of the ectoparasitic mite, Varroa destructor on adult worker honeybee (Apis mellifera) emergence weights, water, protein, carbohydrate, and lipid levels. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 101, 207217. doi: 10.1046/j.1570-7458.2001.00905.x.Google Scholar
Bradford, M. M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye-binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72, 248254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3.Google Scholar
Chance, B. and Maehly, A. C. (1955). Assay of catalases and peroxidases. In Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 2 (ed. Colowick, S. P. and Kaplan, N.), pp. 764775. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Clarkson, P. M. and Thompson, H. S. (2000). Antioxidants: what role do they play in physical activity and health? American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 72 (Suppl.), 637S646S.Google Scholar
Claudianos, C., Ranson, H., Johanson, R. M., Biswas, S., Schuler, M. A., Barenbaum, M. R., Feyereisen, R. and Oakeshott, J. G. (2006). A deficit of detoxification enzymes: pesticide sensitivity and environmental response in the honeybee. Insect Molecular Biology 15, 615636. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2006.00672.x.Google Scholar
Corona, M. and Robinson, G. E. (2006). Genes of the antioxidant system of honey bee: annotation and phylogeny. Insect Molecular Biology 15, 687701. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2006.00695.x.Google Scholar
Duay, P. D., De Jong, D. and Engels, W. (2003). Weight loss in drone pupae (Apis mellifera) multiply infested by Varroa destructor mites. Apidologie 34, 6165. doi: 10.1051/apido:2002052.Google Scholar
Ebert, T. A., Kevan, P. G., Bishop, B. L., Kevan, S. D. and Downer, R. A. (2007). Oral toxicity of essential oils and organic acids fed to honey bees (Apis mellifera). Journal of Apicultural Research 46, 220224. doi: 10.3896/IBRA.1.46.4.02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellman, G. L. (1959). Tissue sulfhydryl groups. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 82, 7077. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(59)90090-6.Google Scholar
Farjan, M., Dmitryjuk, M., Lipiński, Z., Łopieńska-Biernat, E. and Żółtowska, K. (2012). The supplementation with vitamin C honeybee diet: I. The effect on antioxidative system of Apis mellifera carnica brood. Journal of Apicultural Research 51, 263270. doi: 10.3896/IBRA.1.51.3.07.Google Scholar
Francis, R. M., Nielsen, S. L. and Kryger, P. (2013). Varroa–virus interaction in collapsing honey bee colonies. PLoS ONE 8, e57540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057540.Google Scholar
Ghezzi, P. (2011). Role of glutathione in immunity and inflammation in the lung. International Journal of General Medicine 4, 105113. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S15618.Google Scholar
Gliński, Z. and Jarosz, J. (1988). Varroa jacobsoni invasion and the level of cell-free immunity in upright larvae of the worker honey bee, Apis mellifera . Folia Veterinaria 32, 3950.Google Scholar
Gliński, Z. and Jarosz, J. (1992). Varroa jacobsoni as a carrier of bacterial infections to a recipient bee host. Apidologie 23, 2531. doi: 10.1051/apido:19920103.Google Scholar
Hadaś, E. and Stankiewicz, M. (1998). Superoxide dismutase and total antioxidant status of larvae and adults of Trichostrongylus colubriformis, Haemonchus contortus and Ostertagia circumcinta . Parasitological Research 84, 646650.Google Scholar
Halliwell, B. (2011). Free radicals and antioxidants – Quo vadis? Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 32, 125130. Doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2010.12.002.Google Scholar
Harz, M., Müller, F. and Rademacher, E. (2010). Organic acids: acute toxicity on Apis mellifera and recovery in the haemolymph. Journal of Apicultural Research 49, 9596. doi: 10.3896/IBRA.1.49.1.14.Google Scholar
Jay, C. S. (1962). Colour changes in honeybee pupae. Bee World 43, 119122.Google Scholar
Jay, C. S. (1963). The development of honeybees in their cells. Journal of Apicultural Research 2, 117134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karazafiris, E., Tananaki, Ch., Menkissoglu-Spiroudi, U. and Hrasyvoulou, A. (2008). Residue distribution of the acaricide coumaphos in honey following application of a new slow-release formulation. Pest Management Science 64, 165171. doi: 10.1002/ps.1493.Google Scholar
Kostaropoulos, I., Mantzari, A. E. and Papadopoulos, A. I. (1996). Alterations of some glutathione S-transferase characteristics during the development of Tenebrio molitor (Insecta: Coleoptera). Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 26, 963969. doi: 10.1016/S0965-1748(96)00063-X.Google Scholar
Lipiński, Z. and Szubstarski, J. (2007). Resistance of Varroa destructor to most commonly used synthetic acaricides. Polish Journal of Veterinary Society 10, 289294.Google ScholarPubMed
Lipiński, Z. and Żółtowska, K. (2005). Preliminary evidence associating oxidative stress in honey bee drone brood with Varroa destructor . Journal of Apicultural Research 44, 126128. doi: 10.3896/IBRA.1.44.3.08.Google Scholar
Maggi, M. D., Ruffinengo, S. R., Mendoza, Y., Ojeda, P., Ramallo, G., Floris, I. and Eguaras, M. J. (2011). Susceptibility of Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae) to synthetic acaricides in Uruguay: varroa mites’ potential to develop acaricide resistance. Parasitology Research 108, 215221. doi: 10.1007/s00436-010-2122-5.Google Scholar
Mishra, V. (2007). Oxidative stress and role of antioxidant supplementation in critical illness. Clinical Laboratory 53, 199209.Google Scholar
Murilhas, A. M. (2002). Varroa destructor infestation impact on Apis mellifera carnica capped worker brood production, bee population and honey storage in a Mediterranean climate. Apidologie 33, 271281. doi: 10.1051/apido:2002013.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, J. G., Johnson, R. M., Berebaum, M. R., Ranson, H., Cristino, A. S. and Claudianos, C. (2010). Metabolic enzymes associated with xenobiotic and chemosensory responses in Nesonia vitripennis . Insect Molecular Biology 19 (Suppl. 1), 147163. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2009.00961.x.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, A. A., Polemitou, I., Yiangou, A. and Tananaki, C. (2004). Glutathione S-transferase in the developmental stages of the insect Apis mellifera macedonica . Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology C 139, 8792. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2004.09.009.Google Scholar
Podczasy, J. J. and Wei, R. (1988). Reduction of iodonitrotetrazolium violet by superoxide radicals. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 150, 12941301. doi: 10.1016/0006-291X(88)90770-X.Google Scholar
Rosenkranz, P., Aumeier, P. and Ziegelmann, B. (2010). Biology and control of Varroa destructor . Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 103 (Suppl.), S96S119. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2009.07.016.Google Scholar
Sammataro, D., Gerson, U. and Needham, G. (2000). Parasitic mites of honey bees, life history, implications, and impact. Annual Review of Entomology 45, 519548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sau, A., Pellizzari-Tregno, F., Valentino, F., Federici, G. and Cauccuri, A. M. (2010). Glutathione transferases and development of new principles to overcome drug resistance. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 500, 116122. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2010.05.012.Google Scholar
Sorci, G. and Faivre, B. (2009). Inflammation and oxidative stress in vertebrate host–parasite systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364, 7183. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0151.Google Scholar
Stevenson, M. A., Benard, H., Bolger, P. and Morris, R. S. (2005). Spatial epidemiology of the Asian honey bee mite (Varroa destructor) in the North Island of New Zealand. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 71, 241252. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.07.007.Google Scholar
Van Engelsdorp, D., Evans, J. D., Saegerman, C., Mullin, Ch., Haubruge, E., Nguyen, B. K., Frazier, M., Frazier, J., Cox-Foster, D., Chen, Y., Underwood, R., Tarpy, D. R. and Pettis, J. S. (2009). Colony collapse disorder: a descriptive study. PLoS ONE 4, e 6481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006481.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, D. and Smith, G. C. (2002). A model of the mite parasite, Varroa destructor, on honeybees (Apis mellifera) to investigate parameters important to mite population growth. Ecological Modelling 148, 263275. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00440-9.Google Scholar
Wu, J. Y., Anelli, C. M. and Sheppard, W. S. (2011). Sub-lethal effects of pesticide residues in brood comb on worker honey bee (Apis mellifera) development and longevity. PLoS ONE 6, e14720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014720.Google Scholar
Yang, X. and Cox-Foster, D. (2005). Impact of ectoparasite on the immunity and pathology of an invertebrate. Evidence for immunosuppression and viral amplification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102, 74707475. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501860102.Google Scholar
Żółtowska, K., Lipiński, Z. and Dmitryjuk, M. (2005). The total protein content, protein fractions and proteases activity of drone prepupae of Apis mellifera due to varroatosis. Wiadomości Parazytologiczne 51, 4347.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Body weight (A) and protein content (B) in the developmental stages of parasitized honeybee worker broods (mean±s.d.). C, group without supplementation with vitamin C; AA, group after supplementation with vitamin C (ascorbic acid); L, larval stages; PP, prepupae; P, pupae; A, newly emerged workers. *Significant difference between means of groups C and AA (P < 0·05).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Total antioxidant status (TAS) (A) and glutathione (GSH) (B) content in developmental stages of parasitized honeybee worker broods (mean±s.d.). C, group without supplementation with vitamin C; AA, group after supplementation with vitamin C (ascorbic acid); L, larval stages; PP, prepupae; P, pupae, A, newly emerged workers. *Significant difference between means of groups C and AA (P < 0·05).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Activity of antioxidative enzymes in the developmental stages of parasitized honeybee worker broods (mean±s.d.). C, group without supplementation with vitamin C; AA, group after supplementation with vitamin C (ascorbic acid); L, larval stages; PP, prepupae; P, pupae, A, newly emerged workers. (A) Superoxide dismutase (SOD); (B) catalase (CAT); (C) peroxidase (POX); (D) glutathione S-transferase (GST). *Significant difference between means of group C and AA (P < 0·05).

Figure 3

Table 1. Influence of varrosis and supplementation of diet with vitamin C on body weight, protein concentration and antioxidants of newly emerged honeybee workers (mean±s.d.)