Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T22:45:17.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exit versus voice – options for socially responsible investment in collective pension plans – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2019

Peter Dietsch
Peter Dietsch*
Affiliation:
Département de Philosophie, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, Succursale Centre‐ville, Montréal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada
*
Email: peter.dietsch@umontreal.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Correction
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , July 2020 , pp. 265
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

The author would like to correct a figure error in the aforementioned paper:

On page one, the figure “C$200 million” should be “C$27 million”, so the entire paragraph reads:

“Among the reported investments are several that I would prefer not to have in my portfolio: General Dynamics, a US arms producer, has been among the top 10 US shares; the pension plan owns shares worth about C$27 million in two of the biggest tar sands companies, Suncor and Canadian Natural Resources; the list could go on. Many of my colleagues share my dissatisfaction with this state of affairs.”

The author would like to apologize for this error.