Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T06:47:46.994Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prevalence and Characteristics of Earthquake-Related Head Injuries: A Systematic Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2021

Yutaka Igarashi*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
Narumi Matsumoto
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
Tatsuhiko Kubo
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health and Health Policy, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
Masahiro Yamaguchi
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan Department of Neurosurgery, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Chiba, Japan
Ryuta Nakae
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
Hidetaka Onda
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
Shoji Yokobori
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
Yuichi Koido
Affiliation:
Institute for Clinical Research, National Disaster Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
Hiroyuki Yokota
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
*
Corresponding author: Yutaka Igarashi, Email: igarashiy@nms.ac.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

We conducted a systematic review to determine the prevalence and characteristics of earthquake-associated head injuries for better disaster preparedness and management.

Methods:

We searched for all publications related to head injuries and earthquakes from 1985 to 2018 in MEDLINE and other major databases. A search was conducted using “earthquakes,” “wounds and injuries,” and “cranio-cerebral trauma” as a medical subject headings.

Results:

Included in the analysis were 34 articles. With regard to the commonly occurring injuries, earthquake-related head injury ranks third among patients with earthquake-related injuries. The most common trauma is lower extremity (36.2%) followed by upper extremity (19.9%), head (16.6%), spine (13.1%), chest (11.3%), and abdomen (3.8%). The most common earthquake-related head injury was laceration or contusion (59.1%), while epidural hematoma was the most common among inpatients with intracranial hemorrhage (9.5%) followed by intracerebral hematoma (7.0%), and subdural hematoma (6.8%). Mortality rate was 5.6%.

Conclusion:

Head injuries were found to be a commonly occurring trauma along with extremity injuries. This knowledge is important for determining the demands for neurosurgery and for adequately managing patients, especially in resource-limited conditions.

Type
Systematic Review
Copyright
© Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2021

Introduction

Earthquakes are a devastating natural disaster and they have killed around 1,000,000 people in the past 20 years. 1,2 The location of the head at the top of the body makes it most prone to injuries caused by falling objects and building collapse. Reference Lu-Ping, Rodriguez-Llanes and Qi3 Head injury was the most frequent cause of earthquake-related death and accounting for up to 30% of fatalities. Reference Gu, Zhou and Yang4-Reference Kurt, Küçük, Celik, Demirhan, Gül and Altaca9 Appropriate and timely management is crucial for reducing the mortality and morbidity of patients with head injuries after an earthquake because patients with head injuries that require intervention generally warrant more urgent attention than those with extremity injuries. Reference Lu-Ping, Rodriguez-Llanes and Qi3,Reference Qiu, Liu and Wang10-Reference Aycan, Yener, Aycan, Gönüllü, Dursun and Gönüllü13

Little is known regarding the prevalence, diagnosis, surgery and outcomes of earthquake-related head injuries. Identifying the characteristics of earthquake-related head injuries is important for better disaster preparedness and management. Since no such systematic review has been published to date, we conducted a systematic review of head injuries resulting from earthquakes.

Methods

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy was developed to identify all publications related to earthquakes and head injuries. The following databases were searched: Medline (Northfield, IL), ISI Web of Science (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY), the Cochrane Library (The Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom), and ICHUSHI (Japan Medical Abstracts Society, Japan), which is a bibliographic database in Japan.

A search was conducted using “earthquakes,” “wounds and injuries,” and “craniocerebral trauma” as medical subject headings. We included publications that were written in English, French, Spanish, Italian, Chinese, and Japanese. The publication period was set from January 1985 to July 2018.

We included the articles which described the proportion of head injury among all injury and earthquake-related head injuries after earthquakes. Among the authors were two who screened the article titles and reviewed the abstracts and full-length articles for inclusion in this review. In case of a disagreement between two authors, the third author made the final decision regarding the inclusion of an article. The authors also performed a hand search to review the references of the included studies. Articles that only described spinal, facial, extremity, or torso injuries were excluded while reviews, commentaries, editorials, and single case reports were excluded.

Results

The literature search identified 3,226 articles, 1,765 of which were duplicates and were excluded, leaving 1,461 to be screened. The title and abstract of these articles were screened, and 156 articles were selected for reading. Careful reading of the full-length texts led to identification of 34 articles for inclusion in the analysis (Figure 1). Of these articles, 25 described the proportion of head injury-related trauma among all injury-related trauma patients who were victims of an earthquake (Table 1), and the other 10 articles described earthquake-related head injuries (Table 2).

Figure 1. The flowchart of this systematic review.

Table 1. Proportion of patients with head and other injuries after a major earthquake

Abbreviations: CDC, centers for disease control and prevention; N/A, not available ; SSR, Soviet Socialist Republic; US, United States.

Table 2. Diagnosis, major surgery, and mortality of patients with head injury after a major earthquake

Abbreviations: EDH, epidural hematoma; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; N/A, not available; SDH, subdural hematoma.

Proportion of Patients With Head Injuries

Head injuries accounted for 1.8 – 25.7% of injuries among trauma patients after an earthquake. The mean prevalence of head injuries was 16.6% from 25 studies. The most common injuries were those to the lower extremities (36.2%) and upper extremities (19.9%), followed by those to the spine (13.1%), chest (11.3%), and abdomen (3.8%).

Median interval of patient registration after earthquakes was 16 days (interquartile range 9 – 41). Limited to the studies within 3 days after earthquakes, head injures accounted for 13.2%.

Neurological Surgery

Studies of inpatients admitted to the department of neurological surgery were found, and 4770 patients were included in the 10 studies (Table 2). The mean age of these patients was 32.6 years. It was found that 59.1% of the patients with head injuries had contusion/laceration; 32.3%, skull fracture; 9.5%, epidural hematoma; 7.0%, intracerebral hematoma; and 6.8%, subdural hematoma. Patients who received major surgery accounted for 15.4%, and the mortality rate was 5.6%.

Median interval of patient registration after earthquakes was 22 days (interquartile range 14 – 53). Of the studies, 3 showed that the largest number of people occurred within 24 hours after an earthquake. Reference Xu, You and Zhou22,Reference Li, Yang, Xu, Chen and You44,Reference Gu, Yang and Cheng45 On the other hand, 2 studies showed that more patients occurred following 48 hours compared with initial 24 hours in Pakistan and Nepal. Reference Bhatti, Ahmed, Qureshi, Akram and Khan42,Reference Karmacharya and Sathian47

Discussion

This review revealed that head injuries were the third most common injuries among patients who were victims of earthquakes. It also revealed that epidural hematoma was the most common earthquake-related intracranial hemorrhage.

Injury Severity

The characteristics of earthquake-related head injury are relatively mild and extra-cranial. Earthquake-related head injuries were more frequently associated with a soft tissue wound (50.7% versus 26.2%, relative risk [RR] = 1.9) and less frequently with intracranial hemorrhage (17.2% vs 50.7%, RR = 0.3) compared with non-earthquake-related head injuries. Reference Chu, Yang, Dong, Chen, Zhu and Shao14 Earthquake-related head injuries are likely to occur at a low velocity following an earthquake compared with traffic accidents. The mean injury severity score (ISS) was 6.6 for hospitalized patients with head injuries. Patients with an ISS of ≤ 16 accounted for 87.0% – 96.3% of all injured earthquake victims. Reference Peek-Asa, Kraus, Bourque, Vimalachandra, Yu and Abrams7,Reference Qiu, Liu and Wang10 After the Sichuan earthquake, patients with an abbreviated head injury scale score ≥ 4 accounted for 1.7% of hospitalized patients. Classification using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) showed that 8.3% of these patients had moderate traumatic brain injury. Reference Aycan, Yener, Aycan, Gönüllü, Dursun and Gönüllü13

Multiple Injuries

Earthquake-related head injuries likely involve multiple injuries. Patients with multiple injuries comprised 26.7% – 56.7% of all individuals injured following an earthquake. Reference Bhatti, Ahmed, Qureshi, Akram and Khan15-Reference Sánchez-Carrillo17 A study determined that 43.3% of the individuals injured after an earthquake had a single injury, whereas the rest had multiple injuries, namely 45.8% had 2 injuries, 9.0% had 3 injuries, 1.7% had 4 injuries, and 0.2% had 5 injuries. Reference Lu-Ping, Rodriguez-Llanes and Qi3 Out of all patients with head injuries, 23.9% – 26.7% had other additional injuries, which were managed by the respective specialists.

Among patients with head injuries who had multiple injuries, the other injuries were found to be as follows: cervical vertebral fracture (8.6%), thoracic vertebral fracture (22.9%), lumbar vertebral fracture (17.1%), rib fracture (28.6%), clavicle fracture (8.6%), and pulmonary contusion (5.7%). Reference Chu, Yang, Dong, Chen, Zhu and Shao14

Diagnosis

According to 10 studies, the most common type of head injury after an earthquake was laceration or contusion, accounting for 59.2% of all cases, followed by skull fracture (32.3%) and intracranial hemorrhage (22.1%).

Skull fractures stemming from earthquake-related head injury were observed in the frontal bone (8.5%), parietal bone (8.5%), temporal bone (12.8%), occipital bone (10.0%), sphenoid bone (2.8%), and mandible (11.3%). The proportion of patients with earthquake-related occipital and mandible bone fractures was significantly higher than the proportion of patients with non-earthquake-related occipital and mandible bone fractures. In contrast, the proportion of patients with earthquake-related maxilla fracture (6.4%) was significantly lower than for that with non-earthquake-related maxilla facture (P < 0.05). Reference Chu, Yang, Dong, Chen, Zhu and Shao14

The most common type of intracranial hemorrhage was epidural hematoma (EDH), which accounted for 9.5% of inpatients with head injury across 9 studies, followed by intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) (7.0%) and subdural hematoma (SDH) (6.8%). In all except 2 small studies, the proportion of patients who developed EDH was higher than those who developed SDH. In general, EDH was observed in 1% – 4% of traumatic brain injury cases, the incidence of which was lower than that of SDH. Reference Bullock, Chesnut and Ghajar18 Although the exact incidence rate is unknown, EDH is more common than SDH after an earthquake.

Neurological Surgery

The most common type of surgery conducted on patients with earthquake-related head injury was debridement and suture, which accounted for 33.1% – 64.7% of the inpatient cases. Of all patients with cranial wounds, 66.3% had multiple wounds. Reference Qiu, Liu and Wang10,Reference Bhatti, Ahmed, Qureshi, Akram and Khan15

Major surgery was defined as craniotomy, evacuation of hematoma, and cranium repair under general anesthesia. The mean proportion of inpatients with head injury that underwent major surgery was 15.5%. Among patients with altered mental status, focal neurological deficits and skull fracture, 29% were operated under general anesthesia. In contrast, only 5.3% of patients without these symptoms were underwent surgery. Reference Bhatti, Ahmed, Qureshi, Akram and Khan15

EDH was the most common head injury requiring after an earthquake that required surgical treatment. Craniotomy and hematoma evacuation are the standard treatments for symptomatic EDH. Patients with acute EDH who received surgery within 2 hours after onset of coma had a significantly lower mortality rate (17% versus 56%, P < 0.01) and a higher rate of good recovery (67% versus 13%, P < 0.01) as opposed to patients who received surgery at a later stage (> 2 hours). Reference Haselsberger, Pucher and Auer19 Of the patients with EDH, 10 had a GCS score of < 8 at the time of admission and developed new anisocoria after admission. The patients that underwent craniotomy of more than 90 minutes after the onset of anisocoria were 5 in number, and they all died. Of the other patients, 5 underwent craniotomy within 70 minutes after anisocoria onset, and survived with good recovery or moderate disability. Reference Cohen, Montero and Israel20 These findings indicate that patients with symptomatic EDH should undergo immediate surgical intervention. However, it may be difficult for a large number of patients with EDH to undergo craniotomy under general anesthesia immediately after an earthquake. A single series of patients with EDH underwent burr hole evacuation (trephination) after an earthquake. Of the 36 patients having EDH, 1 required craniotomy after trephination, and although no recurrences or complications were observed among them, 1 of the patients died. Single burr hole surgery is safe and has produced good outcomes for a large number of patients with earthquake-related EDH. Reference Aurangzeb, Ahmed and Maqbool21 Burr hole surgery should therefore be considered when a large number of patients with EDH require surgical intervention.

Outcome

According to 9 studies, head injury-associated mortality ranged from 0.0 to 14.3%, with a mean of 5.6% (Table 2). It is difficult to evaluate and compare head injury-associated mortality because the proportion of severe head injuries is unclear and medical standards differ according to geographical locations. However, based on the analysis of factors that influence mortality rate in hospitals subsequent to the occurrence of a disaster, severe traumatic brain injury was found to be the most common (odds ratio (OR) = 253.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 8.9 – 7208.6), followed by multiple organ failure (OR = 87.8, 95%CI = 3.9 – 1928.3) and prior major disease and infection (OR = 14.9, CI = 1.9 – 119.0). Reference Xu, You and Zhou22 Moreover, mortality and injury profiles were influenced by the time of injury. Reference Shoaf, Sareen, Nguyen and Bourque23

Surveillance

While multicenter retrospective studies did not often detect severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in patients with earthquake-related head injuries, 135 patients with severe (32 patients) and moderate (103 patients) TBI were treated of whom 96 patients underwent surgery under general anesthesia in a neurological facility. Reference Bhatti, Ahmed, Qureshi, Akram and Khan15 This finding highlights the importance of obtaining real-time information about the incidence of TBI, injecting relevant medicines at the appropriate site, and transporting patients to hospitals with sufficient capacity. However, until recently, there was no established methodology for achieving these outcomes. In order to meet this demand, the World Health Organization established a technical working group in 2016, which published a final report defining the standard daily reporting items and a daily reporting form for Emergency Medical Teams (EMTs) in 2017. Reference Jafar, Sergeant and Lecky24 A total of 50 items were selected as the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for EMTs. The MDS includes “major head/spine injury,” which is defined as “any major trauma to the scalp, skull, brain and spinal cord requiring hospitalization and/or surgery under general anesthesia.” According to this daily reporting MDS, EMTs are expected to act as sentinels for TBI surveillance during a disaster. An increasing number of EMTs are expected to contribute toward this ad-hoc surveillance system. Previous studies have suggested that with the passage of time, the proportion of patients with disaster-related injuries decreases while that of patients with injures unrelated to disasters increases. The MDS for EMTs also enlists items related to counting of the number of individuals affected by a disaster. Such data will contribute toward identification of the most appropriate medical assistance for individuals affected by a disaster and reflects a paradigm shift in disaster management.

Limitation

This review has several limitations. A few researches were published when earthquakes occurred in the developing countries despite a high death toll. Prevalence and characteristics of earthquake-related head injuries could vary by economic development and population density. Mortality rate also could be affected with medical standards by country. Therefore, it is required to consider the situation in each country.

Conclusion

Head injury was the main cause of mortality and morbidity after an earthquake. Head injuries were the second most common injury among outpatients and the third most common injury among hospitalized victims of earthquakes. Epidural hematoma was the most common earthquake-associated intracranial hemorrhage. This knowledge is important for identifying the demand for neurosurgery and for adequate management of patients following a disaster under resource-limited conditions.

References

EM-DAT. Brussels, BE: The OFDA/CRED international disaster database. Accessed August 20, 2018.Google Scholar
[Dataset] U. S. Geological Survey. Earthquakes with 50000 or more deaths. Accessed August 20, 2018Google Scholar
Lu-Ping, Z, Rodriguez-Llanes, JM, Qi, W, et al. Multiple injuries after earthquakes: a retrospective analysis on 1871 injured patients from the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Crit Care. 2012;16(3):R87.Google Scholar
Gu, JW, Zhou, HT, Yang, T, et al. Ultimate treatment for a patient with severe traumatic brain injury without intake for 192 hours after Wenchuan massive earthquake. Chin Med J (Engl). 2009;122(1):113116.Google ScholarPubMed
Bulut, M, Fedakar, R, Akkose, S, Akgoz, S, Ozguc, H, Tokyay, R. Medical experience of a university hospital in Turkey after the 1999 Marmara earthquake. Emerg Med J. 2005;22(7):494498.Google ScholarPubMed
Liang, NJ, Shih, YT, Shih, FY, et al. Disaster epidemiology and medical response in the Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;38(5):549555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peek-Asa, C, Kraus, JF, Bourque, LB, Vimalachandra, D, Yu, J, Abrams, J. Fatal and hospitalized injuries resulting from the 1994 Northridge earthquake. Int J Epidemiol. 1998;27(3):459465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanaka, H, Oda, J, Iwai, A, et al. Morbidity and mortality of hospitalized patients after the 1995 Hanshin-Awaji earthquake. Am J Emerg Med. 1999;17(2):186191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurt, N, Küçük, HF, Celik, G, Demirhan, R, Gül, O, Altaca, G. Depremde yaralanan hastalara yaklaşim: 17 Ağustos 1999 Marmara depremi deneyimimiz [Evaluation of patients wounded in the 17 August 1999 Marmara earthquake]. Ulus Travma Derg. 2001;7(1):4951.Google Scholar
Qiu, J, Liu, GD, Wang, SX, et al. Analysis of injuries and treatment of 3401 inpatients in 2008 Wenchuan earthquake - based on Chinese Trauma Databank. Chin J Traumatol. 2010;13(5):297303.Google Scholar
Xie, J, Du, L, Xia, T, Wang, M, Diao, X, Li, Y. Analysis of 1856 inpatients and 33 deaths in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University from the Wenchuan earthquake. J Evid Based Med. 2008;1(1):2026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fan, Z, Li, A, Lian, B, et al. Injury types of victims in the 12th May 2008 Wenchuan earthquake: Analysis of 1,038 patients in Jiangyou City. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2011;37(1):37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aycan, A, Yener, U, Aycan, N, Gönüllü, E, Dursun, R, Gönüllü, H. Neurosurgical injuries caused by the 2011 Van earthquake: The experience at the Van Regional Training and Research Hospital. J Emerg Med. 2015;49(4):464470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, ZG, Yang, ZG, Dong, ZH, Chen, TW, Zhu, ZY, Shao, H. Comparative study of earthquake-related and non-earthquake-related head traumas using multidetector computed tomography. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(10):17351742.Google ScholarPubMed
Bhatti, SH, Ahmed, I, Qureshi, NA, Akram, M, Khan, J. Head trauma due to earthquake October, 2005 - experience of 300 cases at the Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2008;18(1):2226.Google Scholar
Zheng, X, Hu, Y, Yuan, Y, Zhao, YF. Retrospective cohort analysis of chest injury characteristics and concurrent injuries in patients admitted to hospital in the Wenchuan and Lushan earthquakes in Sichuan, China. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e97354. Published 2014 May 9.Google ScholarPubMed
Sánchez-Carrillo, CI. Morbidity following Mexico City’s 1985 earthquakes: Clinical and epidemiologic findings from hospitals and emergency units. Public Health Rep. 1989;104(5):482488.Google ScholarPubMed
Bullock, MR, Chesnut, R, Ghajar, J, et al. Surgical management of acute epidural hematomas. Neurosurgery. 2006;58(3 Suppl):S7-iv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haselsberger, K, Pucher, R, Auer, LM. Prognosis after acute subdural or epidural haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1988;90(3-4):111116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, JE, Montero, A, Israel, ZH. Prognosis and clinical relevance of anisocoria-craniotomy latency for epidural hematoma in comatose patients. J Trauma. 1996;41(1):120122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aurangzeb, A, Ahmed, E, Maqbool, S, et al. Burr hole evacuation of extradural hematoma in mass trauma. A life saving and time saving procedure: Our experience in the earthquake of 2005. Turk Neurosurg. 2016;26(2):205208.Google Scholar
Xu, J, You, C, Zhou, L, et al. Long-term results of patients with head injuries treated in different hospitals after the Wenchuan, China, earthquake. World Neurosurg. 2011;75(3-4):390396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shoaf, KI, Sareen, HR, Nguyen, LH, Bourque, LB. Injuries as a result of California earthquakes in the past decade. Disasters. 1998;22(3):218235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jafar, AJN, Sergeant, JC, Lecky, F. What is the inter-rater agreement of injury classification using the WHO minimum data set for emergency medical teams?. Emerg Med J. 2020;37(2):5864.Google ScholarPubMed
Noji, EK, Kelen, GD, Armenian, HK, Oganessian, A, Jones, NP, Sivertson, KT. The 1988 earthquake in Soviet Armenia: A case study. Ann Emerg Med. 1990;19(8):891897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, WK, Cheng, YC, Ng, KC, Hung, JJ, Chuang, CM. Were there enough physicians in an emergency department in the affected area after a major earthquake? An analysis of the Taiwan Chi-Chi earthquake in 1999. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;38(5):556561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, N, Shah, H, Patel, V, Bagalkote, H. Surgical and psychosocial outcomes in the rural injured--a follow-up study of the 2001 earthquake victims. Injury. 2005;36(8):927934.Google ScholarPubMed
Phalkey, R, Reinhardt, JD, Marx, M. Injury epidemiology after the 2001 Gujarat earthquake in India: a retrospective analysis of injuries treated at a rural hospital in the Kutch district immediately after the disaster. Glob Health Action. 2011;4:7196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabzehchian, M, Abolghasemi, H, Radfar, MH, Jonaidi-Jafari, N, Ghasemzadeh, H, Burkle, FM Jr Pediatric trauma at tertiary-level hospitals in the aftermath of the Bam, Iran Earthquake. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006;21(5):336339.Google Scholar
Mohebbi, HA, Mehrvarz, S, Saghafinia, M, et al. Earthquake related injuries: Assessment of 854 victims of the 2003 Bam disaster transported to tertiary referral hospitals. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23(6):510515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tahmasebi, MN, Kiani, K, Mazlouman, SJ, et al. Musculoskeletal injuries associated with earthquake. A report of injuries of Iran’s December 26, 2003 Bam earthquake casualties managed in tertiary referral centers [published correction appears in Injury. 2005;36(6):810. Mohammad Naghi, Tahmasebi [corrected to Tahmasebi, Mohammad Naghi]; Kambiz, Kiani [corrected to Kiani, Kambiz]; Shahriar, Jalali Mazlouman [corrected to Mazlouman, Shahriar Jalali]; Afshin, Taheri [corrected to Taheri, Afshin]; Kamrani Reza, Shahriar [corr]. Injury. 2005;36(1):2732.Google Scholar
Ganjouei, K, Ekhlaspour, L, Iranmanesh, E, et al. The pattern of injuries among the victims of the Bam earthquake. Iranian J Publ Health. 2008;37:7076.Google Scholar
Charuluxananan, S, Bunburaphong, P, Tuchinda, L, Vorapaluk, P, Kyokong, O. Anesthesia for Indian Ocean tsunami-affected patients at a southern Thailand provincial hospital. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006;50(3):320323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulvey, JM, Awan, SU, Qadri, AA, Maqsood, MA. Profile of injuries arising from the 2005 Kashmir earthquake: the first 72 h. Injury. 2008;39(5):554560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helminen, M, Saarela, E, Salmela, J. Characterization of patients treated at the Red Cross field hospital in Kashmir during the first three weeks of operation. Emerg Med J. 2006;23(8):654656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jian, HS, , ZM, Li, YY. Epidemiological investigation on Wenchuan earthquake-struck trauma patients admitted to two hospitals of Chongqing. Chin J Traumatol. 2010;13(2):101102.Google ScholarPubMed
Wang, L, Lei, DL, He, LS, et al. The association between roofing material and head injuries during the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54(3):e10e15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Post-earthquake injuries treated at a field hospital- Haiti, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;59(51):16731677.Google Scholar
O’Connell, C, Shivji, A, Calvot, T. Preliminary findings about persons with injuries – Haïti Earthquake 12 January 2010. Handicap International; 2010. https://reliefweb.int/report/haiti/handicap-international-report-preliminary-findings-about-persons-injuries-ha%C3%AFti. Accessed August 20, 2018.Google Scholar
Kang, P, Tang, B, Liu, Y, et al. Profile and procedures for fractures among 1323 fracture patients from the 2010 Yushu earthquake, China. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(11):21322139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giri, S, Risnes, K, Uleberg, O, et al. Impact of 2015 earthquakes on a local hospital in Nepal: A prospective hospital-based study. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0192076. Published 2018 Feb 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatti, SH, Ahmed, I, Qureshi, NA, Akram, M, Khan, J. Head trauma due to earthquake October, 2005 - experience of 300 cases at the Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2008;18(1):2226.Google Scholar
Jia, L, Li, GP, You, C, et al. The epidemiology and clinical management of craniocerebral injury caused by the Sichuan earthquake. Neurol India. 2010;58(1):8589.Google ScholarPubMed
Li, Q, Yang, CH, Xu, JG, Chen, J, You, C. Cross-sectional study of craniocerebral trauma in a tertiary hospital after 2008 Sichuan earthquake: a brief report of 242 cases and experiences from West China Hospital. J Trauma. 2011;70(6):E108E112.Google Scholar
Gu, J, Yang, W, Cheng, J, et al. Temporal and spatial characteristics and treatment strategies of traumatic brain injury in Wenchuan earthquake. Emerg Med J. 2010;27(3):216219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karibe, H, Kameyama, M, Kawase, M, Hirano, T, Kawaguchi, T, Ito, A. Traumatic head injury after the great east-Japan earthquake. Journal of Japanese Congress on Neurological Emergencies. 2012;24:1216.Google Scholar
Karmacharya, BG, Sathian, B. Study of traumatic brain injury due to recent earthquake in manipal teaching hospital. Nepal Journal of Neuroscience. 2015;12:6366.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. The flowchart of this systematic review.

Figure 1

Table 1. Proportion of patients with head and other injuries after a major earthquake

Figure 2

Table 2. Diagnosis, major surgery, and mortality of patients with head injury after a major earthquake