Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T06:23:03.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EFFECT OF SOWING DENSITY AND SEEDBED TYPE ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS IN BAMBARA GROUNDNUT (VIGNA SUBTERRANEA) IN WOODLAND SAVANNAS OF COTE D'IVOIRE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2009

N'. J. KOUASSI
Affiliation:
University of Abobo-Adjamé, Department of Natural Sciences, Laboratory of Genetics, 02 PB 801 Abidjan 02, Côte d'Ivoire
I. A. ZORO BI*
Affiliation:
University of Abobo-Adjamé, Department of Natural Sciences, Laboratory of Genetics, 02 PB 801 Abidjan 02, Côte d'Ivoire
*
Corresponding author. E-mails: banhiakalou@yahoo.fr and zorobi@uabobo.ci
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea) is one of the most promising food legumes in Africa, due to its agronomic and nutritional potential. To take advantage of these attributes, several research programmes gathering agronomic and genetic data are being implemented throughout Africa. In this context, the response of yield and yield components to sowing density and seedbed type were tested in a three-year (2005, 2006 and 2007) field experiment using a bambara groundnut landrace with a semi-bunch growth habit. Three plant population densities: 13 900 plants ha−1, 62 500 plants ha−1 and 250 000 plants ha−1 were coupled with two seedbed types – raised and flat. A factorial trial using a split-plot design with three replicates was set up to analyse seed yield and plant biomass, as well as nine yield components. Sowing density influenced significantly (p < 0.05) seed yield (direct relationship) and most of the yield components (inverse relationship). The highest seed yields were observed on high-density plots (4.11 ± 1.05 ha−1). In contrast, seedbed type and year of experiment did not influence significantly the marketable yield and plant biomass (p > 0.05). This result has been attributed to the suitability of the amount and distribution of rainfall and temperature for the production of bambara groundnut at the target site. Based on the trend of yield response, cultivation of landraces of bambara groundnut characterized by a semi-bunch growth habit at high density on flat seedbeds was suggested in woodland savannas of Côte d'Ivoire to enhance seeds yield and reduce labour.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

INTRODUCTION

Most investments in agricultural research have been oriented towards a few crops (e.g. maize, rice, wheat, cotton, soyabean), so that today, only 30 plant species are used to meet 95% of world food energy needs (FAO, 1996). Indeed, the exploitation of the wealth of plant diversity (more than 7000 food species, called neglected, underutilized, minor or orphan crops) remains far lower than the potential. Since 1990, interest in minor crop species has increased throughout the world, with the aim of identifying and developing new crops for the export and domestic markets. Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea) is one of the African minor crops receiving growing interest from governments, plant genetic resources institutions and researchers. This is due to its numerous agronomic attributes, particularly, its yielding potential, relatively high resistance to diseases, and adaptability to poor soils and low rainfall (Brink, Reference Brink1999; Collinson et al., Reference Collinson, Clawson, Azam-Ali and Black1997; Reference Collinson, Sibuga, Tarimo and Azam-Ali2000; Elia and Mwandemele, Reference Elia and Mwandemele1986; Massawe et al., Reference Massawe, Azam-Ali and Roberts2003; Mwale et al., Reference Mwale, Azam-Ali and Massawe2007). In addition to these agronomic advantages, the crop is rich in proteins (19–22% of dry matter) and carbohydrates (42–69% of dry matter) (Minka and Bruneteau, Reference Minka and Bruneteau2000; Oliveira, Reference Oliveira1976). Interestingly, these authors reported that bambara groundnut seed proteins are high in the essential amino acids methionine (0.5–1.43 g/16 g N) and lysine (5.4–6.9 g/16 g N).

Recently, scientists from Africa and Europe began a research programme aimed at gathering agronomic, genetic and physiological data, as well as knowledge and perceptions of peasant farmers in order to implement improved production practices for V. subterranea (Heller et al., Reference Heller, Begemann and Mushonga1997; Massawe et al., Reference Massawe, Mwale, Azam-Ali and Roberts2005; Mkandawire, Reference Mkandawire2007; Sesay et al., Reference Sesay, Magagula and Mansuetus2008). These studies, aimed at testing abiotic factors (Elia and Mwandemele, Reference Elia and Mwandemele1986; Mwale et al., Reference Mwale, Azam-Ali and Massawe2007) and some cultural practices (Collinson et al., Reference Collinson, Sibuga, Tarimo and Azam-Ali2000; Karikari et al., Reference Karikari, Chaba and Molosiwa1999) showed variation in the response of bambara groundnut according to cropping system, genotypes and geographical regions.

Dunbar (Reference Dunbar1969) reported from studies carried out in northwestern Tanzania that farmers sow bambara groundnut at an average spacing of 30 cm × 30 cm. In Ghana, Ameyaw and Doku (Reference Ameyaw and Doku1983) suggested a spacing of 60 cm × 30 cm. The seed rate for bambara groundnut has been reported to vary from 25 to 75 kg ha−1, with inter-row and intra-row spacing of 30–75 cm and 10–50 cm, respectively (Duke et al., Reference Duke, Okigbo, Reed and Weder1977). In Eastern Malawi (Chitala), a population density of 167 400 plants ha−1 gave high yields while in Southern Malawi (Thuchila), high yields were obtained at a lower population density (83 720 plants ha−1). Thus it appears that assessing the actual factors influencing the productivity of bambara groundnut requires trials to be conducted throughout contrasted agro-ecosystems and using several landraces.

Reviewing the literature on bambara groundnut also reveals that earlier studies have mainly been conducted in Eastern and Central Africa. In depth scientific investigations on the improvement of bambara groundnut productivity in West Africa are still limited to germination, phenological, pest impact and agronomic evaluation (Adjetey and Ayihi, Reference Adjetey and Ayihi1999; Djè et al., Reference Djè, Bonny and Zoro Bi2005; Doku, Reference Doku1968; Obagwu, Reference Obagwu2003; Ouedraogo et al., Reference Ouedraogo, Ouedraogo, Tignere, Bilma, Dabire and Konate2008; Thottappilly and Rossel, Reference Thottappilly and Rossel1997; Sesay, Reference Sesay2009).

Since 2001, missions to collect local landraces of bambara groundnut have been undertaken throughout the main production zones in Côte d'Ivoire and Burkina Faso. Agronomic evaluation trials and genetic characterization were then undertaken with the aim of accumulating data to allow the implementation of germplasm management strategies and improved cultivation practices as well as promotion of the crop. Accessing the response of crop yield components to planting density and technique is a prerequisite to reach such an objective, since it provides comprehensive data that are useful for management decisions (Echarte et al., Reference Echarte, Luque, Andrate, Sadras, Cirilo, Otegui and Vega2000; Jollife and Gaye, Reference Jollife and Gaye1995). We herein report data on the influence of sowing density and seedbed type on yield and yield components of one of the most common bambara groundnut landraces cultivated in Côte d'Ivoire and Burkina Faso, West Africa.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study site

On farm experiments were conducted in 2005, 2006 and 2007 in the village of Manfla (6°49′34.38″N, 5°43′47.68″W) 400 km north Abidjan (Côte d'Ivoire). There are two rainy seasons separated by a short dry period (July–August) and a long dry season (December–February) at the target site. Annual rainfall varies from 800 to 1400 mm with a long-term mean of 1200 mm, and the annual mean temperature is 27 °C. Over the experimental periods (March–July each year), the mean monthly temperature was 26.5 °C, and mean monthly rainfall ranged from 100.8 mm to 117.5 mm with total rainfall per experimental period of 504.2 mm to 586.3 mm. Mean relative humidity was 81%. The vegetation is a woodland savanna. The study site is a natural fallow plot with vegetation mainly composed of Chromoleana odorata and Panicum maximum. Soils in the study area were deep, friable and sandy-silt. Analysis at a soil depth of 20 cm indicated the following characteristics: pH 6.45, 57% sand, 36% silt, 7% clay, 6% organic matter, 3.5 g/kg of total N, 24.4 g/kg of available P and 0.45 g/kg of K. In the study area, bambara groundnut is usually produced during two cropping seasons in a year. In the first cropping season corresponding to the long rainy period, planting and harvest take place in March and July, respectively. The second cropping season corresponds to the short rainy season; here, plants are sown in July–August and harvested in November–December. All experiments were conducted during the first cropping season, and seeds were sown on the first day of significant rainfall. This was 15 March, 17 March and 17 April, in 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.

Experimental design and cultural practice

A bambara groundnut landrace with a semi-bunch growth habit designated on the basis of seed colour pattern as BgR (creamy coloured seed with red spots), and widely cultivated in Côte d'Ivoire and Burkina Faso, was evaluated. Seeds were obtained from the collection of the University of Abobo-Adjamé, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire. The experimental design was a split-plot with three replicates. Two planting methods regularly used by farmers from the study site to grow bambara groundnut were used: sowing on raised beds and sowing on the flat. Indeed, to prevent weed invasion and facilitate harvest in the target zone, some farmers raise mounds when sowing bambara groundnut. In this experiment, mounds of 60 cm × 60 cm and 30 cm high were raised as seedbeds. From preliminary observations made in the farmers’ fields in the target zone, three densities were determined for the test: low density with 13 900 plants ha−1 (at a spacing of 80 cm × 80 cm), medium density with 62 500 plants ha−1 (at a spacing of 40 cm × 40 cm) and high density with 250 000 plants ha−1 (at a spacing of 20 cm × 20 cm). The subplots had an area of 36 m2 and received 49, 225 and 900 holes for low, medium and high density, respectively.

Four seeds per hole were sown directly and thinned to the final stands at the first leaf-stage. The blocks were weeded weekly with a hoe to prevent the presence of any interaction between planting system, plant spacing and weeds. Disease and pest control was carried out using a carbamate-based insecticide applied when needed.

Data collection and analysis

Yields (seeds production and plant dry biomass: YLD and PDM, respectively) and nine agronomic traits selected from the bambara groundnut descriptor (IITA et al., 2000) and identified as yield components elsewhere (Cornelissen, Reference Cornelissen2005; Karikari and Tabona, Reference Karikari and Tabona2004; Ofori, Reference Ofori1996; Ouedraogo et al., Reference Ouedraogo, Ouedraogo, Tignere, Bilma, Dabire and Konate2008) were measured. Further details of the selected traits and related measurement approaches are indicated in Table 1.

Table 1. Method of measurement of yield components of bambara groundnut in response to planting technique and plant population density.

Combined analysis of variance appropriate to a split-plot design was performed using the general linear model procedure of the SAS statistical package (SAS, 2004). Least significant difference multiple range-tests were used to identify differences among the means of the parameters examined, according to sowing density, seedbed type, years and interactions.

RESULTS

Only one (sowing density) of the three factors tested influenced the marketable yields (YLD and PDM) significantly (Tables 2, 3 and 4). Consequently, only the interactions involving the sowing density were significant for seeds and plant biomass production (Tables 5 and 6). The trend of the results related to the effects of sowing density and seedbed type did not change through the three years of experiment. Thus, data for these two factors were pooled over years and only the means are presented (Table 2 and 3). To assess the results in relation to climatic parameters, means were calculated for each year (Table 4). The two two-way interactions influencing significantly the marketable yield were also analysed (Tables 5 and 6).

Table 2. Yield and yield components as affected by sowing density of bambara groundnut.

The abbreviations are defined in Table 1.

Means per sowing density were calculated independently of seedbed type and years.

§Mean values within rows by parameter followed by the same superscripted letter were not significantly different at p = 0.05 level, on the basis of the least significant difference test.

Table 3. Influence of seedbed type on yield and yield components of bambara groundnut.

The abbreviations are defined in Table 1.

Means per seedbed type were calculated independently of sowing density and years.

Table 4. Variation through years, of yield and yield components response to seedbed type and density in bambara groundnut.

The acronyms are defined in Table 1.

Means by year of experiment were calculated independently of seedbed type and density.

§Mean values within rows by parameter followed by the same superscripted letter were not significantly different at p = 0.05 level, on the basis of the least significant difference test.

Table 5. Response of yield and yield components to crossed effect (interaction) of seedbed type and density in bambara groundnut.

The abbreviations are defined in Table 1.

Means according crossed seedbed type and density were calculated independently of year of experiment.

§ Mean values within rows by parameter followed by the same superscripted letter were not significantly different at p = 0.05 level, on the basis of the least significant difference test.

Table 6. Response of yield and yield components to the interaction of year of experimentation and sowing density in bambara groundnut.

The abbreviations are defined in Table 1.

Means according crossed year of experimentation and sowing density were calculated independently of seedbed type.

§ Mean values within rows by parameter followed by the same superscripted letter were not significantly different at p = 0.05 level, on the basis of the least significant difference test.

All the 11 variables analysed except PFR were significantly influenced by the sowing density (Table 2). The highest values of YLD, PDM and PH were obtained at the highest plant density (250 000 plants ha−1) and decreased with decreasing densities. No significant difference was found between low (13 900 plants ha−1) and medium (62 500 plants ha−1) densities for the plant mean height (PH). For the seven remaining traits tested, the lowest density gave the highest values, followed in decreasing order by the medium and high densities.

Four of the tested parameters (YLD, PDM, PFR and SHI) were not significantly influenced by the seedbed type (Table 3). Highly significant (p < 0.01) differences were found between raised beds and flat planting for the mean values of seven traits (PS, PH, NLP, NPP, NSP, PWP and SWP). The highest values were obtained on raised beds.

No significant differences were observed between years for seed yield and the plant total biomass (Table 4). For the nine other traits, significant differences were observed between years. However, PS, PH, PWP and SWP did not vary significantly between 2005 and 2006. Overall, the yield components tested did not show a clear trend for between-years variation. Indeed, a high number of traits with significantly high or low values was not obtained in any particular year.

Statistical analysis of the interaction between the seedbed type and the sowing density highlighted a significant variation for seed yield and plant biomass, as well as for most of the yield components tested (Table 5). The highest values of the marketable yield and plant biomass were obtained with the high sowing density regardless of the seedbed type. Most of the other traits showed an opposite trend, the highest values being observed on raised beds sown at low density.

Seedbed type × year interaction was not significant (data not shown), due to the fact that the two factors did not influence significantly seed production (t ha−1) and plant biomass (t ha−1). The interactions of sowing density with seedbed type and year of experiment were significant for most of the traits examined (Tables 5 and 6), due to the effect of the sowing density, as demonstrated by the trend of the yields (seed and plant biomass production) that were higher on plots with high sowing density in each of the three years of experiment. The other nine traits did not show a common trend with respect to the interactions.

DISCUSSION

Optimization of plant spatial arrangement and seedbed type is essential for maximizing yield of any crop. Research on manipulations of plant density and seedbed type to fit production factors and objectives are therefore of practical interest for agronomists and breeders. Variation in yield and yield components in relation to factorial change in planting density and technique in a semi-bunch type bambara groundnut revealed relevant trends.

Planting density

All of the yield components estimated on a per-plant basis (PS, PH, NLP, NPP, PWP and SWP) were negatively related to plant density (Table 2). Thus, the lowest density (13 900 plant ha−1) produced the highest mean pod and seed weights per plant (50.5 g and 36.29 g, respectively) and the highest plant density, the lowest mean pod and seed weights per plant (13.74 g and 18.61 g, respectively). This was due to the higher mean numbers of pods and seeds per plant (56.41 and 57.10, respectively) on plots with the lowest plant density. The reduction in seed weight per plant has been associated with increasing plant density in other cultivated legumes such as peanut (Chandrasekaran et al., Reference Chandrasekaran, Somasundaram, Amanullah, Thirukumaran and Sathyamoorthi2007), lentil (Turk et al., Reference Turk, Tawaha and El-Shatnawi2003), chickpea (Bahr, Reference Bahr2007) and faba bean (Idris, Reference Idris2008). Three hypotheses are usually proposed to explain the increase in productivity per plant under lower sowing density: resource availability, intra-species competition and genotype (particularly plant growth habit). The positive effect of plant spacing on the productivity per plant in bambara groundnut could thus be attributed to the fact that in lower densities, developing pods could easily reach the soil surface, due to the spreading growth habit of the plants, leading to better development. Plant growth could also be better with lower planting densities, due to less competition for resources (light, moisture and nutrients), resulting in better pod formation and growth.

In contrast, a direct relationship was observed between plant density and seed and plant dry biomass production estimated on a per-area basis. Similar results have been reported from earlier studies on the same species (Cornelissen, Reference Cornelissen2005). The influence of plant density on seed yield was through the increased production of pods per unit area, but not through increased production of pods per plant. Consequently, in favourable growing conditions, seed yield potential of the bambara groundnut used will increase with increasing plant population to produce more pods per area unit.

Seedbed type

Seed yield (ha−1), biomass production and two yield components (PFR and SHI) were not significantly influenced by the seedbed type. This result could be related to the composition of the soil at the study site. Indeed, with 57% sand, soils are usually so friable that physical management for superficial crusting control is not required (Awadhwal and Thierstein, Reference Awadhwal and Thierstein1985; Bresson, Reference Bresson1995). The results were in accordance with those from a study conducted by Mkandawire and Sibuga (Reference Mkandawire and Sibuga2002) on the same species. The authors reported that when the amount of precipitation is sufficient, i.e. in the long rainy season (the total rainfall reaches 583 mm), planting bambara groundnut on the flat resulted in significantly high grain yield compared to planting in furrows or on ridges. Planting in furrows or on ridges enhanced grain yield only during the short rainy season where rainfalls were low (333 mm). The results related to the effect of seedbed type were also similar to those reported in common bean (Valenciano et al., Reference Valenciano, Casquero, Boto and Guerra2006) and pea (Neumann et al., Reference Neumann, Schmidtke and Rauber2007). Indeed, Valenciano et al. (Reference Valenciano, Casquero, Boto and Guerra2006) showed that sowing common bean on raised beds favoured fast emergence, without yield enhancement.

Effect of climatic parameters

Plant production components (seed and biomass production per unit area) were statistically similar over the three years. Such results were expected since the rainfall during the growing seasons did not vary markedly throughout the three years (504–586 mm). Yield stability is characteristic of bambara groundnut, mainly due to its adaptability to poor soils, high temperatures and low rainfall (Azam-Ali et al., Reference Azam-Ali, Sesay, Karikari, Massawe, Aguilar-Manjarrez, Bannayan and Hampson2001; Brink, Reference Brink1999; Collinson et al., Reference Collinson, Clawson, Azam-Ali and Black1997; Elia and Mwandemele, Reference Elia and Mwandemele1986; Massawe et al., Reference Massawe, Azam-Ali and Roberts2003; Mkandawire and Sibuga, Reference Mkandawire and Sibuga2002; Mwale et al., Reference Mwale, Azam-Ali and Massawe2007). The amount and distribution of seasonal precipitation during the three experimental years appeared to be suitable for the water needs of the genotype used in this study. Using laboratory, greenhouse and field studies, it has been established that the water and temperature requirements of bambara groundnut are around 600 mm and 25 °C, respectively (Collinson et al., Reference Collinson, Sibuga, Tarimo and Azam-Ali2000; Mpotokwane et al., Reference Mpotokwane, Gaditlhatlhelwe, Sebaka and Jideani2008; Sesay, Reference Sesay2009).

CONCLUSIONS

For each production system, there is a population that optimizes the use of available resources, allowing the expression of maximum attainable marketable or biological yield in that environment. The ideal plant number per area will depend on both abiotic and biotic factors. Increasing plant density had a large direct effect on seed production and biomass, and an inverse effect on the yield components of the bambara groundnut landrace tested. For this plant material, a spacing of 20 cm × 20 cm (250 000 plants ha−1) appeared to give the highest grain and biomass yields per unit area, regardless of seedbed type and year of experiment.

Acknowledgments

This research was partly funded by the French Co-operation and Cultural Action Office (Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire). Helpful comments of Professor Assanvo N'Guetta, Dr Atta Diallo and two anonymous reviewers resulted in significant improvement of the manuscript.

References

REFERENCES

Adjetey, J. A. and Ayihi, S. K. (1999). A study on water requirements of bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc) grown in the Accra Plains. Journal of the Ghana Science Association 2: 6973.Google Scholar
Ameyaw, M. V. and Doku, E. V. (1983). Effects of soil moisture stress on the reproductive efficiency and yield of bambara groundnut (Vondzeia subterranea). Tropical Grain Legume Bulletin 28: 2329.Google Scholar
Awadhwal, N. K. and Thierstein, G. E. (1985). Soil crust and its impact on crop establishment: a review. Soil and Tillage Research 5: 289302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azam-Ali, S. N., Sesay, A., Karikari, S. K., Massawe, F. J., Aguilar-Manjarrez, J., Bannayan, M. and Hampson, K. J. (2001). Assessing the potential of an underulized crop: a case study using bambara groundnut. Experimental Agriculture 37: 433472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahr, A. A. (2007). Effect of plant density and urea foliar application on yield and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 3: 220223.Google Scholar
Bresson, L. M. (1995). A review of physical management for crusting control in Australian cropping systems: research opportunities. Australian Journal of Soil Research 33: 195209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, M. (1999). Development, growth and dry matter partitioning in bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea) as influenced by photoperiod and shading. Journal of Agricultural Science 133: 159166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekaran, R., Somasundaram, E., Amanullah, M. M., Thirukumaran, K. and Sathyamoorthi, K. (2007). Influence of varieties and plant spacing on the growth and yield of confectionery groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 3: 525528.Google Scholar
Collinson, S. T., Clawson, E. J., Azam-Ali, S. N. and Black, C. R. (1997). Effect of soil moisture deficits on the water relations of bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc.). Journal of Experimental Botany 48: 877884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collinson, S. T., Sibuga, K. P., Tarimo, A. J. P. and Azam-Ali, S. N. (2000). Influence of sowing date on the growth and yield of bambara groundnut landraces in Tanzania. Experimental Agriculture 36: 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelissen, R. L. E. J. (2005). Modelling variation in the physiology of bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.). PhD thesis. Cranfield University at Silsoe, UK.Google Scholar
Djè, Y., Bonny, B. S. and Zoro Bi, I. A. (2005). Observations préliminaires de la variabilité entre quelques morphotypes de voandzou (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc., Fabaceae) de Côte d'Ivoire. Biotechnology, Agronomy, Society and Environment 9: 249259.Google Scholar
Doku, E. V. (1968). Flowering, pollination and pod formation in bambara groundnut (Voandzeia subterranea) in Ghana. Experimental Agriculture 4: 4148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duke, J. A., Okigbo, B. N., Reed, C. F. and Weder, J. K. P. (1977). Voandzeia subterranea (L.) Thouars. Tropical Grain Legume Bulletin 10: 811.Google Scholar
Dunbar, A. R. (1969). Bambara groundnut (Voandzeia subterranea). In The Annual Crops of Uganda, Nairobi: East African Literature Bureau.Google Scholar
Echarte, L., Luque, S., Andrate, F. H., Sadras, V. O., Cirilo, A., Otegui, M. E. and Vega, C. R. C. (2000). Response of maize kernel number to plant density in Argentinean hybrids released between 1965 and 1963. Field Crops Research 68: 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elia, F. M. and Mwandemele, O. D. (1986). The effect of water deficit droughts on some plant characters in bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea Thouars). Tropical Grain Legume Bulletin 33: 4550.Google Scholar
FAO (1996). Report on the State of the World's Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Prepared for the International Technical Conference on Plant Genetic Resources Leipzig, Germany 17–23 June 1996. Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar
Heller, J., Begemann, F. and Mushonga, J. (Eds) (1997). Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.). Promoting the Conservation and the Use of Underutilized and Neglected Crops: 9. Proceedings of the Workshop on Conservation and Improvement of Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.). Rome: IPGRI.Google Scholar
Idris, A. L. Y. (2008). Effect of seed size and plant spacing on yield and yield components of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 4: 146148.Google Scholar
IPGRI, IITA, BAMNET. 2000. Descriptors for Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterranea). International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy; International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria; The International Bambara Groundnut Network, Germany.Google Scholar
Jollife, P. A. and Gaye, M.-M. (1995). Dynamics of growth and yield component responses of bell peppers (Capsicum annuum L.) to row covers and population density. Scienta Horticulturae 62: 153164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karikari, S. H., Chaba, O. and Molosiwa, B. (1999). Effects of intercropping bambara groundnut on pearl millet, sorghum and maize in Botswana African Crop Science Journal 7: 143152.Google Scholar
Karikari, S. K. and Tabona, T. T. (2004). Constitutive traits and selective indices of bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L) Verdc) landraces for drought tolerance under Botswana conditions. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 29: 10291034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massawe, F. J., Azam-Ali, S. N. and Roberts, J. A. (2003). The impact of temperature on leaf appearance in bambara groundnut landraces. Crop Science 43: 13751379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massawe, F. J., Mwale, S. S., Azam-Ali, S. N. and Roberts, J. A. (2005). Breeding in bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.): strategic considerations. African Journal of Biotechnology 4: 463471.Google Scholar
Minka, S. R. and Bruneteau, M. (2000). Partial chemical composition of bambara pea (Vigna subterranea [L.] Verdc). Food Chemistry 68: 273276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mkandawire, F. L. (2007). Review of bamabara groundnut (Vigna subterranea [L.] Verdc.) production in sub-Sahara Africa. Agricultural Journal 2: 464470.Google Scholar
Mkandawire, F. L. and Sibuga, K. P. (2002). Yield response of bambara groundnut to plant population and seedbed type. African Crop Science Journal 10: 3949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mpotokwane, S. M., Gaditlhatlhelwe, E., Sebaka, A. and Jideani, V. A. (2008). Physical properties of bambara groundnuts from Botswana. Journal of Food Engineering 89: 9398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mwale, S. S., Azam-Ali, S. N. and Massawe, F. J. (2007). Growth and development of bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea) in response to soil moisture: 1. Dry matter and yield. European Journal of Agronomy 26: 345353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, A., Schmidtke, K. and Rauber, R. (2007). Effects of crop density and tillage system on grain yield and N uptake from soil and atmosphere of sole and intercropped pea and oat. Field Crops Research 100: 285293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obagwu, J. (2003). Control of brown blotch of bambara groundnut with garlic extract and benomyl Phytoparasitica 31: 207209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ofori, I. (1996). Correlation and path-coefficient analysis of components of seed yield in bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea). Euphytica 91: 103107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, J. S. (1976). Grain legume of Mozambique. Tropical Grain Legume Bulletin 3: 1315.Google Scholar
Ouedraogo, M., Ouedraogo, J. T., Tignere, J. B., Bilma, D., Dabire, C. B. and Konate, G. (2008). Characterization and evaluation of accessions of bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea [L.] Verdcourt) from Burkina Faso. Science and Nature 5: 191197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS (2004). SAS for Windows. Cary (NC, USA): SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Sesay, A. (2009). Influence of flooding on bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L.) germination: effect of temperature, duration and timing. African Journal of Agricultural Research 4: 100106.Google Scholar
Sesay, A., Magagula, C. N. and Mansuetus, A. B. (2008). Influence of sowing date and environmental factors on the development and yield of bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea) landraces in a sub-tropical region. Experimental Agriculture 4: 167183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thottappilly, G. and Rossel, H. W. (1997). Identification and characterization of viruses infecting bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea) in Nigeria. International Journal of Pest Management 43: 177185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turk, M. A., Tawaha, A. M. and El-Shatnawi, M. K. J. (2003). Response of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik) to plant density, sowing date, phosphorus fertilization and ethephon application in the absence of moisture stress. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 189: 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenciano, J. B., Casquero, P. A., Boto, J. A. and Guerra, M. (2006). Effect of sowing techniques and seed pesticide application on dry bean yield and harvest components. Field Crops Research 96: 212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Method of measurement of yield components of bambara groundnut in response to planting technique and plant population density.

Figure 1

Table 2. Yield and yield components as affected by sowing density of bambara groundnut.

Figure 2

Table 3. Influence of seedbed type on yield and yield components of bambara groundnut.

Figure 3

Table 4. Variation through years, of yield and yield components response to seedbed type and density in bambara groundnut.

Figure 4

Table 5. Response of yield and yield components to crossed effect (interaction) of seedbed type and density in bambara groundnut.

Figure 5

Table 6. Response of yield and yield components to the interaction of year of experimentation and sowing density in bambara groundnut.