Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T04:49:08.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

From Prussian blue to iron carbides: high-temperature XRD monitoring of thermal transformation under inert gases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2017

Claudia Aparicio*
Affiliation:
Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Faculty of Science, Palacký University, Šlechtitelů 27, 783 71 Olomouc, Czech Republic
Jan Filip
Affiliation:
Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Faculty of Science, Palacký University, Šlechtitelů 27, 783 71 Olomouc, Czech Republic
Libor Machala
Affiliation:
Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Faculty of Science, Palacký University, Šlechtitelů 27, 783 71 Olomouc, Czech Republic
*
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: claudia.aparicio@upol.cz
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The thermal behavior and decomposition reaction of Prussian blue (PB) (Fe43+[Fe2+(CN)6]3·xH2O) was studied under inert atmosphere of argon by simultaneous thermogravimetry and differential scanning calorimetry, from room temperature up to 900 °C, with a heating rate of 5 K min−1. Parallel to the thermogravimetric measurements, the thermal process was monitored by in situ X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) technique under nitrogen atmosphere. The thermogravimetric data show six steps, corresponding to different stages of the decomposition reaction; comparable results are also obtained by in situ XRD. In addition, a set of PB samples heated up to selected temperatures (190, 300, 370, 540, 680, and 790 °C) were ex situ analyzed by powder XRD and Mössbauer spectroscopy. It is found that PB exhibits a negative thermal expansion prior to the water release from its crystalline lattice. Above 300 °C, the decomposition is based on the release of cyanogen gas from the PB structure. At 370 °C, a cubic iron cyanide compound is formed, while at higher temperatures several iron carbides were found. The subsequent thermal treatment of these carbides leads to the formation of metallic iron and graphite.

Type
Technical Articles
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 2017 

I. INTRODUCTION

Thermally induced solid-state synthesis is a common method to prepare powder materials; therefore understanding the thermal decomposition process of particular materials is crucial to optimize the synthesis of derived materials. Non-ambient X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) technique proved to be a very useful tool, which in combination with thermal analysis (thermogravimetry—TG and differential scanning calorimetry—DSC) allows us to elucidate the mechanism of the desired reactions.

Beyond its wide use as a pigment and histology stain, Prussian blue (PB) [iron(III) hexacyanoferrate, Fe4 3+[Fe2+(CN)6]3·xH2O, x = 14–16] has been also used as a precursor material for preparation of iron oxides through solid-state thermal decomposition (Machala et al., Reference Machala, Zoppellaro, Tuček, Šafářová, Marušák, Filip, Pechoušek and Zbořil2013; Kong et al., Reference Kong, Tang, Wu, Wei, Wu, Wang, Zheng and Zhao2014; Maeng et al., Reference Maeng, Kim, Lee and Yu2015), and more recently it was used as a precursor for synthesis of iron carbides (Zakaria, Reference Zakaria2016).

There are many factors to be considered when  contemplating on the solid-state route to synthesize a nanopowder material: temperature, atmosphere, heating rate, particle size and shape of the precursor, mass of the sample, and even thickness of the sample; it is important as well whether the precursor is a powder or pressed pellet. Changing any of these factors can lead to a different product formation, or at least a change in the thermal behavior of the precursor material is expected.

In the case of PB, several studies confirmed the previous statements. When heated in air at temperatures above 300 °C, after the breakdown of the crystalline structure by releasing of (CN)2, PB is completely transformed into iron oxides: typically a mixture of maghemite and hematite (Zakaria et al., Reference Zakaria, Hu, Hayashi, Tsujimoto, Ishihara, Imura, Suzuki, Huang, Sakka, Ariga, Wu and Yamauchi2014), but in some cases also β-Fe2O3 (Machala et al., Reference Machala, Zoppellaro, Tuček, Šafářová, Marušák, Filip, Pechoušek and Zbořil2013) or amorphous phase (Zboril et al., Reference Zboril, Machala, Mashlan and Sharma2004) are formed. On the other hand, when PB is heated in inert atmosphere or vacuum, at temperatures above 350 °C, the formation of metallic iron and cementite (Fe3C) is expected. In the previous study, PB was heated in argon up to 1000 °C with a heating rate of 10 K min−1 (Aparicio et al., Reference Aparicio, Machala and Marusak2012), it is observed that the formation of cementite and metallic iron does not occur directly, but through four steps: dehydration of PB, formation of an iron cyanide compound with monoclinic structure, formation of several iron carbides polymorphs (Fe2C, Fe7C3, Fe3C), and, lastly, formation of metallic iron and carbon. Metallic iron and carbon are secondary products, produced after the cementite thermal decomposition at temperatures higher than 800 °C.

In view of the above, a detailed study of the thermal decomposition of PB was carried out in inert atmosphere with a low heating rate. The variation of one parameter, heating rate, led to interesting changes in the PB structure at the beginning of its thermal decomposition. The initial structural changes of the PB crystalline lattice before its decomposition were witnessed by high-temperature (in situ) XRD. While after the thermal decomposition of PB, the formation of iron carbides was monitored in situ and ex situ by the XRD. As a result, the relation between the different forms of iron carbides as well as their thermal stability with the increase of temperature was observed.

II. EXPERIMENTAL

A. Starting material and sample preparation

PB (Sigma Aldrich) was used without further treatment as a starting material. Thermal analysis (TG/DSC) of PB was carried out using a thermal analyzer (STA 449 C Jupiter, Netzsch), which was coupled to mass spectrometer (QMS 403 Aëolos, Netzsch) to analyze the evolved gases (EGA) during the decomposition reaction.

PB powder (10 mg) was placed into an open alumina crucible. Then, it was heated up to 900 °C under argon atmosphere (gas flow 30 ml min−1), with heating and cooling rates of 5 and −40 K min−1, respectively. An additional set of PB samples were heated up to selected temperatures (190, 300, 370, 540, 680, and 790 °C). The resulting samples were labeled as PB190, PB300, PB370, PB540, PB680, PB790, and PB900, respectively.

B. Characterization techniques

XRD patterns were recorded at room temperature (RT) with a PANalytical X'Pert PRO MPD diffractometer in the Bragg-Brentano geometry, CoK α radiation (40 kV, 30 mA, λ = 0.1789 nm), equipped with an X'Celerator detector and programmable divergence and diffracted beam anti-scatter slits. Samples were placed on a zero-background Si slide, gently pressed and scanned with a step size of 0.017°, and 2θ scan range from 15° to 105°. Phase identification and Rietveld quantitative phase analysis were performed using PANalytical HighScore Plus software with PDF-4+ and ICSD databases.

Transmission 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy was carried out in a constant acceleration mode using a 57Co source in rhodium matrix at RT. The spectrometer was calibrated with an α-Fe foil. The spectra were folded and fitted by Lorentzian functions using the computer program CONFIT2000 (Žák and Jirásková, Reference Žák and Jirásková2006).

C. High-temperature in situ XRD

Thermal decomposition of PB was studied from the structural point of view by in situ XRD. Diffraction patterns were collected using a PANalytical X'Pert PRO MPD diffractometer (CoK α radiation) in the Bragg–Brentano geometry, equipped with an X'Celerator high-speed detector and an Anton Paar XRK-900 reaction chamber. The powder sample was placed directly on a glass ceramic Macor holder (14 mm diameter, 0.5 mm deep). Data collection was carried out under nitrogen atmosphere (pressure 1 bar, gas flow rate 20 ml min−1), with a heating rate of 5 K min−1 from RT up to 900 °C. The collection time of each XRD pattern was 10 min (0.12 s step−1, step size of 0.017°, 2θ scan range from 15° to 105°).

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A. Characterization of PB

The purity of commercial PB was checked by XRD and 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy. Both techniques showed that PB powder consisted of iron(III) hexacyanoferrate (PDF 01-073-0689) and a minor phase (~3%) identified as the mineral Jarosite [PDF 01-076-0629, (K,Na)Fe3(SO4)2(OH)6] (Aparicio et al., Reference Aparicio, Machala and Marusak2012). In addition, energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) has been performed on the PB sample, confirming the presence of the elements Na, S, and K (Figure S1).

B. Decomposition of PB under argon atmosphere: TG/DSC analyses

Six differentiated steps can be resolved in the TG curve of PB from RT to 900 °C (Figure 1, Table I). In the same graph the DSC curve and the evolution of gases during the heating process are presented. Water release (m/z = 18) takes place from 55 to 300 °C (according to EGA), which corresponds well with the observed decrease in mass and a wide endothermic peak at 150 °C (steps I and II). Using this information, the amount of water molecules per unit cell was calculated to be five, a number lower than the theoretical value for PB structure. Because of the small amount of Jarosite impurity (~3%) in the PB sample, its contribution is neglected from calculation of water content.

Figure 1. TGA, DSC, and EGA graphs of PB treated under argon atmosphere with a heating rate of 5 K min−1. Roman numbers indicate the different steps of the decomposition.

Table I. Mass loss estimated from TG curve for PB sample heated up to 900 °C in Ar.

The thermal decomposition of PB in argon atmosphere started above 350 °C (step III), with the release of cyanide groups (CN, m/z = 26), forming thereafter hydrogen cyanide HCN (m/z = 27) and cyanogen gas (CN)2 (m/z = 52), and a small amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) (m/z = 44) according to the EGA results (Figure S2). It is reflected by the two small downward peaks in DSC (endo-effect) at 330 and 360 °C.

In contrast, the mass decrease in the other steps (IV–VI) is accompanied by the release of nitrogen (N2, m/z = 28) and probably also a small amount of CO2, during the formation of iron carbides above 400 °C (see the next section). Given that m/z could be assign either to N2 or CO, one cannot rule out the presence of small amount of CO. In this particular case, the presence of the m/z = 14 (N), which is identified as the fragment of the molecular ion N2, besides it have the same emission profile as m/z = 28 (Figure S2). From the previous discussion, it can thus be concluded that m/z = 28 is more likely to be assigned to N2, and the CO contribution might be minimal.

C. Thermal behavior of PB under Ar atmosphere: ex situ XRD and Mössbauer spectroscopy

The phase composition of the PB samples thermally treated up to selected temperatures was variable, showing clearly not only the thermal decomposition of initial PB, but also the formation of iron carbides and their subsequent decomposition (Figure S3).

At 190 °C, a structurally unchanged PB and traces of Jarosite were observed, but at 300 °C PB becomes dehydrated, still preserving its crystalline character. Above 350 °C, PB decomposition has started; in sample PB370 were detected mainly non-transformed PB and an iron cyanide compound, additionally minor organic phases were identified (urea and malic acid). The formation of the aforementioned organic phases from PB (e.g. urea) has been reported earlier during thermal wet decomposition under inert atmosphere by Ruiz-Bermejo et al. (Reference Ruiz-Bermejo, Rogero, Menor-Salván, Osuna-Esteban, Martín-Gago and Veintemillas-Verdaguer2009).

The formed iron cyanide compound match the PDF card 01-075-023, belonging to a Cu(II)–Fe(II) cyanide compound with a cubic structure (space group $F\overline 4 3m$ ). It is known, that most of the ferrocyanide compounds with the structure M2[Fe(CN)6] crystallize in the cubic system, and can be indexed either with the space groups F432, $F\overline 4 3m$ , or $Fm\overline 3 m$ (Ratuszna et al., Reference Ratuszna, Juszczyk and Małecki1995), some examples of these cubic ferrocyanides are displayed in Figure S4 and the details are listed in Table S1. Other clue about the structure of this iron cyanide compound is given by the Mössbauer spectrum of the sample PB370 (Figure 2(a), Table II). In the spectrum, spectral components were identified (L1, D2) corresponding to undecomposed PB, the high value of quadrupole splitting (QS) can be related to strain in the PB lattice (Samain et al., Reference Samain, Grandjean, Long, Martinetto, Bordet and Strivay2013). Sub-spectra L2 (singlet) and D1 (doublet) correspond to Fe2+ cations with low-spin and high-spin states, respectively. The presence of the singlet with a small isomer shift (IS = −0.09 mm s−1) close to zero and absence of a QS, is a clear indicator of a highly symmetric site typical for cubic structures with fcc arrangement, where the Fe2+ is six-coordinated. The doublet (IS = 1.12 mm s−1, QS = 1.47 mm s−1), represent a Fe2+ cation with high-spin state. Then,  both sub-spectral components can be assigned to the formed iron cyanide compound, where the values of the IS and QS are close to the ones measured in a pure sample of ferrous ferrocyanide (Hu and Jiang, Reference Hu and Jiang2011). It can be concluded that the formed compound is likely the iron(II) hexacyanoferrate(II) (Fe2[Fe(CN)6]), also known as Berlin white (BW). Finally, the provenance of the singlet (L3) with a broad linewidth will be explained below.

Figure 2. Room-temperature Mössbauer spectra of samples PB370 (a) and PB540 (b). PB (gray and dark gray subspectra), BW (white doublet and dashed singlet), Fe2C (black sextet).

Table II. Mössbauer parameters obtained from the fit of spectra for samples PB370 and PB540 heated under argon atmosphere.

IS, isomer shift; QS, quadrupole splitting; W, experimental line width; B hf, magnetic hyperfine field; HS, high spin; LS, low spin; S, sextet; D, doublet; L, singlet.

The formation of BW differs from the previous study, where a monoclinic iron cyanide structure was identified (Aparicio et al., Reference Aparicio, Machala and Marusak2012); however, it agrees with other study performed in argon atmosphere (Allen and Bonnette, Reference Allen and Bonnette1974). It is suggested that the reason of such disagreement might be the different heating rate of 10 vs. 5 K min−1 in this study, as this can be compared with the diffraction patterns from PB samples taken after the dehydration steps at the beginning of the PB transformation (step III, at 400 and 380 °C for samples heated under argon with 10 and 5 K min−1, respectively) in Figure S5, where the diffraction patterns are significantly different.

At 540 °C, all PB has been transformed into BW, and also simultaneously started the formation of iron carbides: hexagonal (Fe2+x C, P6322) and orthorhombic (Fe2C, Pbcn) forms. Minor phases oxydiacetic acid and urea has been also identified. From the Mössbauer spectrum (Figure 2(b), Table II) BW was identified (D2, L1), where the doublet has a higher value of QS, denoting a deformation of the octahedral site of ferrous ions. It was not possible to assign the doublet D1 (ferric ions most probably in octahedral coordination) to any compound identified in the XRD pattern. The singlet L2, with a very wide linewidth, has a similar isomer shift to singlet L3 in sample PB370. It could reflect the arrangement of iron cations prior to the formation of iron carbides, being in accordance with the poor crystallinity of iron carbides observed in the respective XRD pattern. The presence of a sextet with small subspectral area (7.3%) is ascribed to crystalline Fe2C.

In sample PB680, it is observed that the formation of Eckstrom-Adcock carbide (Fe7C3, P63 mc) along with other iron carbides. At higher temperatures, the samples typically contain different iron carbides: in sample PB790 were identified Fe7C3, Hägg carbide (Fe5C2, C12/c1), cementite (Fe3C, Pnma), and a small amount of K4[Fe(CN)6]. The formation of Fe5C2 was not observed at higher heating rates (Aparicio et al., Reference Aparicio, Machala and Marusak2012). In sample PB900 the predominant phase is cementite, additionally, diffraction lines from metallic iron (α-Fe, $Im\overline 3 m$ ) were also present.

D. Thermal behavior of PB under nitrogen atmosphere: in situ XRD

The 43 XRD patterns collected during the high temperature measurements were categorized into six groups, corresponding to the steps observed in TG (Figure 1). Representative XRD patterns from each group are shown in Figure 3. Quantitative phase analysis was performed for all diffraction patterns using the Rietveld method, considering only the known phases and excluding the minor phases in the XRD patterns. Unit-cell of PB was refined using the Herren model with $Fm\overline 3 m$ space group (Herren et al., Reference Herren, Fischer, Ludi and Hälg1980), and BW was refined using the Ratuszna and Juszczyk model with $F\overline 4 3m$ space group (Juszczyk et al., Reference Juszczyk, Johansson, Hanson, Ratuszna and Małecki1994; Ratuszna et al., Reference Ratuszna, Juszczyk and Małecki1995) for anhydrous forms of M 2[Fe(CN)6].

Figure 3. Selected XRD patterns from in situ measurements of PB heated under N2. The symbols represent the identified phases: Jarosite (J), Fe4[Fe(CN)6]3 (), Fe2[Fe(CN)6] (), Fe2+x C (), Fe2C (), Fe7C3 (), Fe2C5 (), Fe3C (), γ-Fe0 (), C (), Urea (+), Malic acid (#), 2-Naphthylamine-1-sulfonic acid (z), Na2(SO3) (w), K3N (p), NaCN (y).

Below 300 °C, PB is not decomposed and the structure is preserved, but one can observe changes in the position of the main diffraction peaks in the XRD pattern (Figure S6). Up to 180 °C, reflections (200), (220), and (400) are shifted to the high-angle side with the increase in temperature, clearly indicating a negative thermal expansion (Matsuda et al., Reference Matsuda, Kim, Ohoyama and Moritimo2009). On the contrary, a positive thermal expansion is observed above 180 °C. The observed negative thermal expansion can be related to dehydration of PB, as a result of a progressive contraction of the unit cell with the release of water molecules (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Temperature dependence of unit-cell parameters of PB showing negative thermal expansion. The dashed line is a guide to the eye.

Figure 5 summarizes the course of PB transformation into BW, further decomposed into iron carbides, leading to the final products cementite, iron, and carbon; results which are comparable with those obtained when PB was heated under argon.

Figure 5. (a) Quantitative results of the Rietveld analysis of XRD patterns collected in situ during the thermal decomposition of PB under nitrogen atmosphere. (b) Close-up view of the central region of the graph marked with a rectangle in (a).

E. Overall mechanism of thermal decomposition of PB and relationship between iron-carbide phases

The first step in the thermal decomposition of PB is dehydration. In the TG graph (Figure 1) the mass loss between 35 and 189 °C corresponds to the release of 3.5 uncoordinated water molecules from the PB structure (Δm th = −6.39%). Then, a slight decrease of mass up to 300 °C, corresponds to the release of 1.5 coordinated water molecules (Δm th = −3.09%).

Between 300 and 420 °C, along with the release of (CN) groups from the dehydrated PB structure, PB is transformed into BW (Figure 5), according to the following reaction:

(1) $${\rm Fe}_4 [{\rm Fe}({\rm CN})_6 ]_3 \to {\rm} 7/3{\rm Fe}_2 [{\rm Fe}({\rm CN})_6 ] + 2{\rm} ({\rm CN})_2. $$

Figure 5 shows that orthorhombic Fe2C and hexagonal Fe2+x C (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.33) are the first iron carbides formed up to 580 °C, followed by a steady increase of the amount of Fe2C between 580 and 660 °C, thus indicating a faster decomposition of BW. At 620 °C, hexagonal iron carbide Fe7C3 is formed. The process can be explained by the following equations:

(2) $$7{\rm Fe}_2 {\rm C} \to 2{\rm Fe}_7 {\rm C}_3 + {\rm C,}$$
(3) $$3{\rm F}{\rm e}_{2 + x}{\rm C} \to {\rm F}{\rm e}_7{\rm C}_3.$$

Between 660 and 760 °C, the iron carbide Fe5C2 has been formed, and its weight percentage increases steeply at the same rate as Fe7C3. The weight percentage of both iron carbides increases (Fe5C2 and Fe7C3) at the same time that the weight percentage of Fe2C decreases, suggesting a transformation of the primary iron carbide. Minor phases Fe3C and C are also present. The possible relation between these carbides can be expressed by:

(4) $$6{\rm Fe}_2 {\rm C} \to {\rm Fe}_7 {\rm C}_3 + {\rm Fe}_5 {\rm C}_2 + {\rm C,}$$
(5) $$4{\rm Fe}_2 {\rm C} \to {\rm Fe}_5 {\rm C}_2 + {\rm Fe}_3 {\rm C} + {\rm C}{\rm.} $$

A decrease in Fe7C3 (−11 wt%) is observed between 760 and 780 °C. At the same time, the weight percentage of Fe5C2 and Fe3C increased by 5 and 13%, respectively. The sharp rise in Fe3C weight percentage might be explained by the equations:

(6) $$3{\rm Fe}_7 {\rm C}_3 \to {\rm 7Fe}_3 {\rm C} + 2{\rm C,}$$
(7) $$3{\rm Fe}_5 {\rm C}_2 \to 5{\rm Fe}_3 {\rm C} + {\rm C}{\rm.} $$

Equation (7) has been proposed earlier by Iguchi et al. (Reference Iguchi, Kouda and Shibata2004) and Herranz et al. (Reference Herranz, Rojas, Pérez-Alonso, Ojeda, Terreros and Fierro2006). It is also known that formation of cementite occurs at temperatures higher than 480 °C and that Fe5C2 always precedes Fe3C formation (Cohn and Hofer, Reference Cohn and Hofer1953).

Above 800 °C, the phase composition consists of Fe3C, γ-Fe, and C. It is obvious from Figure 5 that the decrease in weight percentage of Fe3C corresponds to a formation of γ-Fe and C (3 Fe3C → 3 Fe + C), because of the instability of cementite at temperatures higher than 700 °C (Iguchi et al., Reference Iguchi, Kouda and Shibata2004; Chaira et al., Reference Chaira, Sangal and Mishra2007).

The observed transformations between carbides agree with the known fact that the stability of iron carbides increases when the carbon content decreases: Fe2C < Fe2.2−2.4C < Fe5C2 < Fe3C (Le Caer et al., Reference Le Caer, Dubois, Pijolat, Perrichon and Brussiѐre1982; Jung and Thomson, Reference Jung and Thomson1992).

Taking into account the provided information by TG/EGA and XRD, one can summarize the overall decomposition mechanism of PB in inert atmosphere by Eq. (8). In this equation, nitrogen was included. Although its provenance is not well understood, it was released during the transformation of iron carbides (Figure 1): Fe2C to Fe5C2 and Fe7C3 (642 °C), Fe7C3 to Fe3C (763 °C), and Fe3C to Fe (842 °C). Such as nitrogen release has been witnessed before in other studies during the thermal decomposition of insoluble PB (Allen and Bonnette, Reference Allen and Bonnette1974), soluble PB (Chamberlain and Greene, Reference Chamberlain and Greene1963), and other hexacyanoferrates (Gallagher and Prescott, Reference Gallagher and Prescott1970) in inert atmosphere or vacuum. In those cases, the nitrogen was detected above 400 °C in the case of the PB, and above 600 °C in the case of the other hexacyanoferrates. Additionally, as in the present study, the final decomposition products of the aforementioned compounds are Fe3C, Fe, and C. These studies only mention the final products, but not the intermediate iron carbides, and they claim thermal decomposition follow the route: ferrocyanide → Fe(CN)2 → Fe3C, Fe, C. Other reasons supporting the evolution of nitrogen is the fact that the main products of PB decomposition are iron carbides and not iron nitrides as proved by EDS analysis (Figure S1). Other minor compounds containing nitrogen has been identified from XRD (Figure 2 and S1), but they also contain elements from the impurities of the precursor material (K, Na, and S) as proved from EDS analysis (Figure S1).

(8) $${\rm Fe}_4 [{\rm Fe}({\rm CN})_6 ]_3 \cdot 5{\rm H}_2 {\rm O} \to 2{\rm Fe}_3 {\rm C} + {\rm Fe} + {\rm 2C} + 7({\rm CN})_2 + 2{\rm N}_2 + 5{\rm H}_2 {\rm O}{\rm.} $$

The theoretical mass loss is −53.74%, as calculated from Eq. (8), which slightly differs from the experimentally observed mass loss of −56.39%. The reason for the differences could be attributed to the minor impurities in the initial PB.

IV. CONCLUSION

PB decomposes when heated above 300 °C under inert atmosphere with a low heating rate. Dehydration of PB occurs at about 150 °C, followed by degradation of the structure leading to release of cyanogen gas (CN)2, thus leading to a transformation of PB to the cubic iron(II) hexacyanoferrate(II), and finally to the breakdown of the formed cubic structure. The products formed after decomposition of PB are mainly iron carbides. Initially, Fe2C (hexagonal and orthorhombic) is formed and then transformed to other crystalline forms of iron carbides: Fe5C2, Fe7C3, and Fe3C. A small amount of iron (α- or γ-Fe0) is also formed as a result of the decomposition of cementite (Fe3C) at temperatures higher than 800 °C in inert atmospheres.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0885715617000471

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (LO1305).

References

Allen, J. F. and Bonnette, A. K. (1974). “Thermal decomposition of Prussian blue: isotopic labeling with Mössbauer-inactive Fe-56,” J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 36, 10111016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aparicio, C., Machala, L., and Marusak, Z. (2012). “Thermal decomposition of Prussian blue under inert atmosphere,” J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 110, 661669.Google Scholar
Chaira, D., Sangal, S., and Mishra, B. K. (2007). “Synthesis of aluminium–cementite metal matrix composite by mechanical alloying,” Mater. Manuf. Process. 22, 492496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, M. and Greene, A. (1963). “Differential thermal analysis on some cyano and cyanonitrosyl ion complexes,” J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 25, 14711475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, E. M. and Hofer, L. J. E. (1953). “Some thermal reactions of the higher iron carbides,” J. Chem. Phys. 21, 354359.Google Scholar
Gallagher, P. K. and Prescott, B. (1970). “Further studies of the thermal decomposition of Europium Hexacyanoferrate (III) and ammonium Europium Hexacyanoferrate(II),” Inorg. Chem. 9(11), 25102512.Google Scholar
Herranz, T., Rojas, S., Pérez-Alonso, F. J., Ojeda, M., Terreros, P., and Fierro, J. L. G. (2006). “Genesis of iron carbides and their role in the synthesis of hydrocarbons from synthesis gas,” J. Catal. 243, 199211.Google Scholar
Herren, F., Fischer, P., Ludi, A., and Hälg, W. (1980). “Neutron diffraction study of Prussian blue, Fe4[Fe(CN)6]3xH20. Location of water molecules and long-range magnetic order,” Inorg. Chem. 19, 956959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, M. and Jiang, J. S. (2011). “Facile synthesis of air-stable Prussian white microtubes via hydrothermal method,” Mater. Res. Bull., 46, 702707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iguchi, Y., Kouda, T., and Shibata, T. (2004). “Kinetics of decomposition and re-oxidation resistance of θ- and χ-Iron carbides at elevated temperatures and influence of their formation conditions,” ISIJ Int. 44, 243249.Google Scholar
Jung, H. and Thomson, W. J. (1992). “Dynamic X-ray diffraction study of an unsupported iron catalyst in Fischer–Tropsch synthesis,” J. Catal. 134, 654667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juszczyk, S., Johansson, C., Hanson, M., Ratuszna, A., and Małecki, G. (1994). “Structural and magnetic properties of Me2[Fe(CN)6] compounds, where Me are 3d transition metals,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 138, 281286.Google Scholar
Kong, B., Tang, J., Wu, Z., Wei, J., Wu, H., Wang, Y., Zheng, G., and Zhao, D. (2014). “Ultralight Mesoporous Magnetic Frameworks by Interfacial Assembly of Prussian Blue Nanocubes,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 28882892.Google Scholar
Le Caer, G., Dubois, J., Pijolat, M., Perrichon, V., and Brussiѐre, P. (1982). “Characterization by Mössbauer spectroscopy of iron carbides formed by Fischer–Tropsch synthesis,” J. Phys. Chem. 86, 47994808.Google Scholar
Machala, L., Zoppellaro, G., Tuček, J., Šafářová, K., Marušák, Z., Filip, J., Pechoušek, J., and Zbořil, R. (2013). “Thermal decomposition of Prussian blue microcrystals and nanocrystals – iron(III) oxide polymorphism control through reactant particle size,” RSC Adv. 3, 1959119599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maeng, H. J., Kim, N., Lee, D. K., and Yu, H. (2015). “Synthesis of mesoporous iron oxide particles by using Prussian blue,” Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 36, 10581060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuda, T., Kim, J. E., Ohoyama, K., and Moritimo, Y. (2009). “Universal thermal response of the Prussian blue lattice,” Phys. Rev. B 79, 172302.Google Scholar
Ratuszna, A., Juszczyk, S., and Małecki, G. (1995). “Crystal structure of the three-dimensional magnetic network of type Mek[Fe(CN)6]l·mH2O, where Me=Cu, Ni, Co,” Powder Diffr. 10(4), 300305.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Bermejo, M., Rogero, C., Menor-Salván, C., Osuna-Esteban, S., Martín-Gago, J., and Veintemillas-Verdaguer, S. (2009). “Thermal wet decomposition of Prussian blue: implications for prebiotic chemistry,” Chem. Biodivers. 6, 13091321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samain, L., Grandjean, F., Long, G. J., Martinetto, P., Bordet, P., and Strivay, D. (2013). “Relationship between the synthesis of Prussian blue pigments, their color, physical properties, and their behavior in paint layers,” J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 96939712.Google Scholar
Žák, T. and Jirásková, Y. (2006). “CONFIT: Mössbauer spectra fitting program,” Surf. Interface Anal. 38, 710714.Google Scholar
Zakaria, M. B. (2016). “Nanostructuring of nanoporous iron carbide spheres via thermal degradation of triple-shelled Prussian blue hollow spheres for oxygen reduction reaction,” RSC Adv. 6, 1034110351.Google Scholar
Zakaria, M. B., Hu, M., Hayashi, N., Tsujimoto, Y., Ishihara, S., Imura, M., Suzuki, N., Huang, Y., Sakka, Y., Ariga, K., Wu, K., and Yamauchi, Y. (2014). “Thermal conversion of hollow Prussian blue nanoparticles into nanoporous iron oxides with crystallized hematite phase,” Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 11371141.Google Scholar
Zboril, R., Machala, L., Mashlan, M., and Sharma, V. (2004). “Iron(III) oxide nanoparticles in the thermally induced oxidative decomposition of Prussian blue, Fe4[Fe(CN)6]3,” Cryst. Growth Des. 4, 13171325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. TGA, DSC, and EGA graphs of PB treated under argon atmosphere with a heating rate of 5 K min−1. Roman numbers indicate the different steps of the decomposition.

Figure 1

Table I. Mass loss estimated from TG curve for PB sample heated up to 900 °C in Ar.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Room-temperature Mössbauer spectra of samples PB370 (a) and PB540 (b). PB (gray and dark gray subspectra), BW (white doublet and dashed singlet), Fe2C (black sextet).

Figure 3

Table II. Mössbauer parameters obtained from the fit of spectra for samples PB370 and PB540 heated under argon atmosphere.

Figure 4

Figure 3. Selected XRD patterns from in situ measurements of PB heated under N2. The symbols represent the identified phases: Jarosite (J), Fe4[Fe(CN)6]3 (), Fe2[Fe(CN)6] (), Fe2+xC (), Fe2C (), Fe7C3 (), Fe2C5 (), Fe3C (), γ-Fe0 (), C (), Urea (+), Malic acid (#), 2-Naphthylamine-1-sulfonic acid (z), Na2(SO3) (w), K3N (p), NaCN (y).

Figure 5

Figure 4. Temperature dependence of unit-cell parameters of PB showing negative thermal expansion. The dashed line is a guide to the eye.

Figure 6

Figure 5. (a) Quantitative results of the Rietveld analysis of XRD patterns collected in situ during the thermal decomposition of PB under nitrogen atmosphere. (b) Close-up view of the central region of the graph marked with a rectangle in (a).

Supplementary material: File

Aparicio supplementary material

Figures S1-S6 and Table S1

Download Aparicio supplementary material(File)
File 773.6 KB