Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-09T14:07:22.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shell morphology and relative growth variability of the invasive pearl oyster Pinctada radiata in coastal Tunisia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2011

Amel Bellaaj-Zouari*
Affiliation:
Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer, Centre La Goulette, Port de Pêche, 2060, Tunis, Tunisia
Souheil Dkhili
Affiliation:
Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer, Centre La Goulette, Port de Pêche, 2060, Tunis, Tunisia
Refka Gharsalli
Affiliation:
Institut National Agronomique de Tunisie, 43 Avenue Charles Nicolle, Tunis cité Marajéne, 1082, Tunisia
Abdelkrim Derbali
Affiliation:
Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer, Centre La Goulette, Port de Pêche, 2060, Tunis, Tunisia
Nejla Aloui-Bejaoui
Affiliation:
Institut National Agronomique de Tunisie, 43 Avenue Charles Nicolle, Tunis cité Marajéne, 1082, Tunisia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: A. Bellaaj-Zouari, Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer, Centre La Goulette, Port de Pêche, 2060, Tunis, Tunisia email: amel.zouari@instm.rnrt.tn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The variability of shell morphology and relative growth of the invasive pearl oyster Pinctada radiata was studied within and among ten populations from coastal Tunisia using discriminant tests. Therefore, 12 morphological characters were examined and 34 metric and weight ratios were defined. In addition to the classic morphological characters, populations were compared by the thickness of the nacreous layer. Results of Duncan's multiple comparison test showed that the most discriminative ratios were the width of nacreous layer of right valve to the inflation of shell, the hinge line length to the maximum width of shell and the nacre thickness to the maximum width of shell. The analysis of variance revealed an important inter-population morphological variability. Both multidimensional scaling analysis and the squared Mahalanobis distances (D2) of metric ratios divided Tunisian P. radiata populations into four biogeographical groupings: the north coast (La Marsa); harbours (Hammamet, Monastir and Zarzis); the Gulf of Gabès (Sfax, Kerkennah Island, Maharès, Skhira and Djerba) and the intertidal area (Ajim). However, the Kerkennah Island population was discriminated by the squared Mahalanobis distances (D2) of weight ratios in an isolated group suggesting particular trophic conditions in this area. The allometric study revealed high linear correlation between shell morphological characters and differences in allometric growth among P. radiata populations. Unlike the morphological discrimination, allometric differentiation shows no clear geographical distinction. This study revealed that the pearl oyster P. radiata exhibited considerable phenotypic plasticity related to differences of environmental and/or ecological conditions along Tunisian coasts and highlighted the discriminative character of the nacreous layer thickness parameter.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2011

INTRODUCTION

Having an Indo-Pacific origin, the small pearl oyster Pinctada radiata (Leach, 1814) is described as the first exotic bivalve being introduced in the Mediterranean Sea by lessepsian migration (Monterosato, Reference Monterosato1878) as Meleagrina savignyi. The lessepsian or erythrean migration phenomenon, is the most illustrative example of man-mediated, either intentionally or accidentally, environmental changes (Por, Reference Por1978, Reference Por1990). In fact, it has led to the introduction in the Mediterranean of hundreds of exotic species through the Suez Channel and has consequently caused significant ecological and economic impacts in this area (Galil, Reference Galil2000; Zenetos et al., Reference Zenetos, Koutsoubas and Vardala-Theodorou2004).

Advanced modes of introduction of the pearl oyster P. radiata in the Mediterranean Sea have been described in the literature: mariculture (intentional introduction); shipping which is considered to be the most likely introduction vector of non-indigenous species (Zibrowius, Reference Zibrowius1992); and transport by fouling on other migrants such as the turtle Caretta caretta (accidental introduction) (Oliverio et al., Reference Oliverio, Gerosa and Cocco1992). Herdman & Hornell (Reference Herdman and Hornell1903) and Meng et al. (Reference Meng, Li and Xing1996) speculated that P. radiata might be introduced in the Mediterranean through its larvae which have three weeks of planktonic life thus ensuring long-distance dispersal.

The pearl oyster P. radiata is the most important species used for producing cultured pearls (Gervis & Sims, Reference Gervis and Sims1992; Al-Matar et al., Reference Al-Matar, Carpenter, Jackson, Al-Hazeem, AL-Saffar, Abdulghaffar and Carpenter1993; Martinez-Fernandez et al., Reference Martinez-Fernandez, Acosta Salmon, Rangel-Davalos, Olivera, Ruiz-Rubio and Romo-Pinera2003) and it is considered as a biomonitor for heavy metal levels in the marine environment (Al-Madfa et al., Reference Al-Madfa, Abdel-Moati and Al-Gimaly1998; De Mora et al., Reference De Mora, Fowler, Wyse and Azemard2004).

The taxonomic status of the pearl oyster P. radiata is still a subject of confusion. It has been described firstly as conspecific with P. fucata (Hynd, Reference Hynd1955) and later as its synonymy (Ranson, Reference Ranson1961). In Australia, it is named P. imbricata (Shirai, Reference Shirai1994; Colgan & Ponder, Reference Colgan and Ponder2002), whereas in China, P. radiata is named P. fucata, P. martensii and P. fucata martensii (Yu & Chu, Reference Yu and Chu2006). At present, the taxonomic name Pinctada radiata, given by Leach (1814), is the only name used for this small pearl oyster in the East Indies, Arabian Gulf and Mediterranean Sea, including Tunisian waters.

Called also rayed pearl oyster (Fisher et al., Reference Fisher, Schnneider and Baichat1987), P. radiata was first reported in Tunisia in 1891 in Djerba (Gulf of Gabès, southern coast) by Bouchon-Brandely & Berthoule (Reference Bouchon-Brandely and Berthoule1891). Pinctada radiata specimens were recorded later in Sfax and Djerba (Vassel, Reference Vassel1899). By 1929, the occurrence of P. radiata was noted in the channel of Sidi Bou Harrouch in El Biban Lagoon (Seurat, Reference Seurat1929) and in the north-west of Bougrara lagoon (Zaouali, Reference Zaouali1978), where it had disappeared after nearly sixty years (Zaouali & Beaten, Reference Zaouali and Beaten1985). In the early 1970s, the pearl oyster P. radiata began to extend its distribution to the northern and eastern coasts of Tunisia. Indeed, Ktari-Chakroun & Azouz (Reference Ktari-Chakroun and Azouz1971) reported that they had collected living individuals of P. radiata from Kelibia and Cani Islands located both in Cap Bon (north-east of Tunisia). A recent study revealed the dense presence of P. radiata on the northern and eastern coasts. At present, P. radiata colonizes most Tunisian coastal habitats from the south to the north but Bizerta lagoon represents the meridional limit of its distribution (Tlig-Zouari et al., Reference Tlig-Zouari, Rabaoui, Irathni and Ben Hassine2009).

Furthermore, morphometric characters of bivalve shells are prominent in intrapopulation and interpopulation differentiation, and reflect evidence of direct environmental influence on shell morphology that shows a high degree of phenotypic plasticity, particularly in oysters (Stenzel, Reference Stenzel and Moore1971; Harry, Reference Harry1985; Lawrence, Reference Lawrence1995; Batista et al., Reference Batista, Ben-Hamadou, Fonseca, Taris, Ruano, Reis-Henriques and Boudry2008), frequently being involved in the life history tactics (Madec & Daguzan, Reference Madec and Daguzan1993). Besides conventional morphometric approaches, geometric morphometric methods, based on shell shape profile, were used. It has been shown that the elliptic Fourier analysis has a great power in discrimination between geographical groups (Ferson et al., Reference Ferson, Rohlf and Koehn1985; Palmer et al., Reference Palmer, Pons and Linde2004; Allen, Reference Allen2006) and between species with a high level of resemblance (Innes & Bates, Reference Innes and Bates1999; Rufino et al., Reference Rufino, Gaspar, Pereira and Vasconcelos2006; Costa et al., Reference Costa, Menesatti, Aguzzi, D'Andrea, Antonucci, Rimatori, Pallottino and Mattoccia2010).

As regards the pearl oyster P. radiata, morphometric characters have been used in the discrimination of populations from around Bahrain (Beaumont & Khamdan, Reference Beaumont and Khamdan1991; Al-Sayed et al., Reference Al-Sayed, Al-Rumaihi and Al-Rumaidhm1993) and in the differentiation of morphologically similar pearl oysters Pinctada species in eastern Australia (Colgan & Ponder, Reference Colgan and Ponder2002). In Tunisia, previous studies focused on shell morphometry of P. radiata populations from the Kerkennah Islands (Tlig-Zouari & Zaouali, Reference Tlig Zouari and Zaouali1994) and northern and eastern coastal Tunisia (Tlig-Zouari et al., Reference Tlig-Zouari, Rabaoui, Irathni and Ben Hassine2009); there were, however, too few morphometric characters.

In the present study, we focused on the shell morphological and relative growth variability of P. radiata populations at ten sampling sites along coastal Tunisia using 12 morphometric characters. Obtained data provide further insights to the plasticity of P. radiata species, determine whether nacre thickness is a powerful morphometric character in P. radiata populations' differentiation and help in explaining the origin and the introduction mode of this species in Tunisian waters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sampling

A total number of 693 individuals of the pearl oyster Pinctada radiata were collected randomly in ten sites along the Tunisian coastline (Figure 1; Table 1). With the exception of the intertidal specimens from Ajim, all other individuals were collected by SCUBA divers at 2–15 m depth. The total number of specimens sampled in each site is indicated in Table 1. Though Ajim and Djerba belong to the same location, the former is in-shore and the latter is off-shore.

Fig. 1. Distribution map of sampling sites for the pearl oyster Pinctada radiata on coastal Tunisia: La Marsa, Hammamet, Monastir, Sfax, Kerkennah Island, Maharès, Skhira, Ajim, Djerba and Zarzis.

Table 1. Pinctada radiata populations from coastal Tunisia: sampling sites, total number of individuals, mean shell height and thickness of nacreous layer.

min, minimum; max, maximum.

Morphometric measurements

The following morphometric characters were recorded for each individual: maximum height (H) and width (W) of shell, inflation (R), hinge length (HL) and total weight of shell and soft body (TW). After opening specimens, tissues were removed and each valve was assigned a number and subjected to further morphological measurements: maximum height and width of nacreous layer of right (HNR; WNR) and left (HNL; WNL) valve, shell weight (SW) and weights of right (RW) and left (LW) valve. Length measurements were conducted using a digital caliper (precision of 0.01 mm) and weight measurements were made using an electrical digital balance (precision of 0.001 g).

Nacreous layer thickness measurements

On each shell valve of Pinctada radiata specimens, a section axis was traced through the nacre layer surface considering its growth lines according to Hynd (Reference Hynd1955) and Anwar et al. (Reference Anwar, Richardson and Seed1990). The section axis was perpendicular to the hinge line and it started at the third part of the hinge line length (Figure 2A). Valves were then delicately sectioned using a diamond disc (HORICO, DIAFLEX) and the thickness of nacreous layer was measured at four points (A, B, C and D) under a stereozoom microscope (63×) equipped with a micrometer (Leica MZ8) (Figure 2B). The average thickness was calculated first for the right and left valves separately and then for both of them. Shell nacreous layer thickness (TN) was then obtained.

Fig. 2. (A) Shell valve of the pearl oyster Pinctada radiata showing the section axis through the nacre surface and the four points (A,B, C and D) at which nacre thickness was measured; (B) a stereomicrograph of sectioned valve showing thickness of nacreous layer of P. radiata (63 ×).

Relative growth

Allometric relationships between morphometric shell characters (shell height, shell width, shell inflation, total weight, shell weight and nacreous layer thickness) were established, through regression analysis, for all populations combined and separately. The linear least squares method for log-transformed data of each parameter was applied (Carino & Monteforte, Reference Carino and Monteforte1995):

\log_e Y = \log_e a + b \times \log_e X \lpar Y = aX^{b}\rpar

where Y and X are dependent and independent morphometric parameters, respectively, «a» is constant and «b» is an exponent. The Student's t-test was carried out to determine the type of growth allometry.

Data analyses

All recorded morphometric characters were used to calculate 28 metric ratios (W/H, R/H, HL/H, HNR/H, HNL/H, WNR/H, WNL/H, TN/H, R/W, HL/W, HNR/W, HNL/W, WNR/W, WNL/W, TN/W, WNL/HNL, WNL/WNR, HL/R, HNR/R, HNL/R, WNR/R, WNL/R, TN/R, TN/HL, HNL/HNR, WNR/HNR, HNL/WNR and WNL/HNR) and 6 weight ratios (SW/TW, RW/TW, LW/TW, RW/SW, LW/SW and LW/RW). The squared Mahalanobis distances (D2) between centroids based on the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity, analysis of variance (ANOVA), multidimentional scaling (MDS) and Duncan's multiple comparison test were applied to compare these ratios using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS 6.1).

RESULTS

Description of Pinctada radiata populations

Shell height frequency distribution of collected Pinctada radiata specimens, shown in Figure 3, revealed wide variability. The total average height of P. radiata individuals was 63.46 mm. The mean shell height varied considerably among P. radiata populations (Table 1). It ranged from 49.90 ± 8.16 mm in the population from La Marsa to 72.71 ± 22.41 mm in that from Hammamet. The largest P. radiata specimen recorded during this investigation was collected from Hammamet and measured 104.34 mm in shell height while the smallest one was spotted at Monastir harbour and measured 6.48 mm. We noticed that specimens larger than 70 mm were predominant in populations from Hammamet (77.36%), Maharès (59.62%), Skhira (44.15%) and Zarzis (47.5%). On the other hand, P. radiata juveniles having a shell length smaller than 15 mm were non-existent in La Marsa, Sfax, Maharès and Ajim populations and their frequency did not exceed 5.66% in the other prospected sites. We noted an important heterogeneity within all populations of P. radiata notably those from Monastir and Hammamet having standard deviations of 20.9 and 22.33, respectively.

Fig. 3. Frequency distribution of shell height (H) of the pearl oyster Pinctada radiata from coastal Tunisia (N = 693).

Nacreous layer thickness analysis

Often, nacre thickness is considered as the main quantifiable characteristic for objective evaluation of pearl quality (Matlins, Reference Matlins1996). In this study, we used nacreous layer thickness, in addition to the conventional shell morphological characters, to reveal differences on shell growth and morphology among P. radiata populations. Collected P. radiata oysters ranged in nacreous layer thickness from 0.32 (La Marsa) to 2.07 mm (Maharès), with a mean value of 0.93 mm. Within populations, the average thickness of nacreous layer varied between 0.69 mm for the intertidal population of Ajim and 1.34 mm for that of Maharès. The populations of Hammamet, Maharès and Djerba showed higher mean nacreous layer thickness exceeding 1 mm. The greatest thickness recorded for P. radiata from coastal Tunisia (2.07 mm) was ten times smaller than that of the giant pearl oyster P. maxima (2 cm) (Milet et al., Reference Milet, Berland, Lamghari, Mouries, Jolly, Borzeix, Doumenc and Lopez2004).

Relative shell growth analyses

In order to investigate the variability of shell growth in the pearl oyster Pinctada radiata from coastal Tunisia, six allometric relationships between morphometric shell characters were determined for all populations combined and separately. In this paper, only those of all combined populations are illustrated (Figure 4). Their linear equations and correlation coefficients are shown in Figure 4. Results showed that for the same allometric relationship, all three types of allometric growth (isometry and both positive and negative allometry) can be observed within populations. Therefore, for better interpretation of the data, populations will be classified according to the type of their allometric growth into groups arranged as follows: group (1) showing negative allometry; group (2) exhibiting isometric growth; and group (3) displaying positive allometry.

Fig. 4. Allometric relationships between shell morphometric characters of the pearl oyster Pinctada radiata from coastal Tunisia. (A) Shell height to shell width (H-W); (B) shell height to inflation (H-R); (C) inflation to shell width (R-W); (D) total weight to shell height (TW-H); (E) shell weight to shell height (SW-H); (F) nacreous layer thickness to shell height (TN-H).

HEIGHT–WIDTH RELATIONSHIP

Assuming an allometric growth, a regression analysis showed a significant linear correlation between shell height and shell width of the pearl oyster Pinctada radiata. The correlation coefficient was 0.948 (P < 0.05) for the combined population (Figure 4A) and it ranged among populations from 0.90 (Ajim) to 0.98 (Hammamet). The b values fluctuated between 0.88 (Ajim) and 1.03 (Zarzis). For shell height and shell width relationship, group (1) was composed of populations from Ajim and Maharès and group (2) was made up of the other populations. The combined population of the pearl oyster P. radiata showed also an isometric growth.

HEIGHT–INFLATION RELATIONSHIP

A high correlation between shell height and shell inflation was detected in all populations combined (R = 0.891 at P < 0.05) (Figure 4B) and separately. Indeed, the correlation coefficient ranged between 0.77 (La Marsa) to 0.98 (Djerba and Hammamet). Populations from Maharès and Ajim displayed the highest (1.27) and the lowest (0.71) b values, respectively. Results revealed that the pearl oyster Pinctada radiata grew more slowly in shell height than in inflation. For this relationship, group (1) consisted of populations from Hammamet, Kerkennah Island, Skhira and Djerba, group (2) was composed of La Marsa, Monastir, Sfax, Ajim and Zarzis populations and group (3) was made up of the Maharès population. For the combined population, shell height and shell inflation was negatively allometric.

INFLATION–WIDTH RELATIONSHIP

For the combined population of Pinctada radiata, the pattern observed for this relationship was similar to that of the height–inflation relationship (Figure 4C), the regression analysis showed a positive correlation between shell inflation and shell width (R = 0.885 at P < 0.05) and the t-test calculated on the value of the exponent (0.76) indicated a negative allometric growth. Correlation between shell inflation and shell width was also obtained in the different studied populations. The lowest value (0.75) of correlation coefficient was detected in the La Marsa population whereas the highest one (0.98) characterized the Hammamet population. The b values varied between 0.71 in the Skhira population to 1.07 in that from La Marsa. Populations from Hammamet, Kerkennah Island, Maharès, Skhira, Djerba and Zarzis composed group (1) and group (2) consisted of the other populations.

TOTAL WEIGHT–HEIGHT RELATIONSHIP

The regression analysis showed a high correlation between total weight and shell height not only for the combined population of Pinctada radiata (R = 0.936 at P < 0.05) (Figure 4D) but also for each population. In fact, among populations, the correlation coefficient fluctuated between 0.829 (Ajim) and 0.989 (Djerba). The lowest b value (2.532) was detected in the La Marsa population whereas the Djerba population displayed the highest one (3.192). In the case of this relationship, populations from Hammamet and Skhira composed group (3), those from Kerkennah Island, Maharès and Djerba formed group (2) and group (1) was made up of the other populations. Analysis of the combined population revealed that the pearl oyster Pinctada radiata grew in total weight isometrically throughout the size-range examined (6.48–104.34 mm).

SHELL WEIGHT–HEIGHT RELATIONSHIP

For the combined population of Pinctada radiata, the pattern was similar to the previous relationship of total weight versus shell height (Figure 4E). As shown by the regression analysis, shell weight and shell height of the pearl oyster Pinctada radiata were highly correlated (R = 0.891 at P < 0.05). Unlike the precedent relationship, the t-test calculated on the value of the exponent (2.89) indicated a negative isometric growth pattern. A high correlation between shell weight and shell height was detected within all P. radiata populations. The Ajim population displayed the lowest correlation coefficient (0.803) whereas the population from Djerba exhibited the highest one (0.986). The b values ranged from 2.534 (La Marsa) to 3.267 (Kerkennah Island). For this relationship the three groups were distinguished as follows: group (1) consisting of populations from Kerkennah Island, Maharès and Skhira; group (2) was composed of Ajim and Djerba populations; and group (1) was made up of the other populations.

NACRE THICKNESS–HEIGHT RELATIONSHIP

A relatively low correlation was derived from the analysis between nacre thickness and shell height (R = 0.864 at P < 0.05) (Figure 4F). The t-test calculated on the value of the exponent (0.75) indicated a negative allometric growth. Therefore, the pearl oyster Pinctada radiata grew faster in height than in thickness of the nacreous layer. Only two groups were distinguished. Group (1) was made up of P. radiata species from La Marsa and Ajim and the others populations composed group (2).

Comparative analyses of morphometric shell characters

Different discriminant analyses were performed to study the variability of morphometric shell characters of Pinctada radiata from coastal Tunisia. As shown in Table 2, the values of F calculated for all ratios ranged between 2.86 and 29.49 and were significantly greater than their respective theoretical F (approximately 2, P < 0.05). The ANOVA test carried out on morphometric ratios showed significant differences in P. radiata shell morphology. This result revealed an important phenotypical variability between the examined populations. The Duncan's multiple comparison test showed that the most discriminative ratios were WNR/R, HL/W and TN/W since they provided three non-overlapped groups of P. radiata populations. The squared Mahalanobis distances (D2) of metric ratios revealed significant differences in the shell morphology between P. radiata populations from different sites. Four distinct biogeographical groupings could be then discriminated (Figure 5A):  an isolated group represented by the population from La Marsa; a second group consisting of populations collected from harbours (Hammamet, Monastir and Zarzis); a third group composed of Sfax, Kerkennah Island, Maharès, Skhira and Djerba populations; and the last one made up of the population collected from the intertidal area, Ajim. However, the D2 of weight ratios differentiated only three biogeographical groupings (Figure 5B). The discrimination of the Kerkennah Island population in an isolated group suggested particular trophic conditions in this area. The population clusters provided by the squared Mahalanobis distances (D2) of both metric and weight ratios were discriminated following the geographical distribution of their sampling sites as well as their environmental condition changes. The MDS analyses of both metric (Figure 6A) and weight ratios (Figure 6B) perfectly corroborated the results of the squared Mahalanobis distances (D2).

Fig. 5. Dendrograms of Mahalanobis distances using metric (A) and weight ratios (B) for Pinctada radiata populations from coastal Tunisia.

Fig. 6. Multidimensional scaling plots of metric (A) and weight ratios (B) for Pinctada radiata populations from coastal Tunisia.

Table 2. The mean values of morphometric ratios for the pearl oyster Pinctada radiata from coastal Tunisia. The F statistic contrasting the ratios and the correlation between sites are significant (P < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

Due to the plasticity of shell morphology in pearl oysters, shell morphometry was widely used in both species identification and population differentiation. In this study, the variability of shell morphometrics and growth of Pinctada radiata populations at ten sampling sites along coastal Tunisia were investigated.

The allometric study indicated that P. radiata from coastal Tunisia exhibited isometric growth for the relationship total weight versus shell height, similar to that from the Red Sea (Yassien, Reference Yassien1998), the Mediterranean Sea (Yassien et al., Reference Yassien, Abdel-Razek and Kilada2000) and the Arabian Gulf (Mohammed & Yassien, Reference Mohammed and Yassien2003). Moreover, the values of coefficient b for total weight to shell height (2.98) and for shell weight to shell height (2.89) revealed clearly the significant increase of P. radiata growth in weight. Since it is generally assumed that the relative growth as regards the total weight and shell height reflects the influence of the ecological factors on animals' growth, this study indicated that the environmental conditions were favourable to the growth and the development of P. radiata species and corroborated its being well-established in coastal Tunisia. Recent studies on the distribution and densities of P. radiata in northern and eastern (Tlig-Zouari et al., Reference Tlig-Zouari, Rabaoui, Irathni and Ben Hassine2009) and in southern (Derbali et al., Reference Derbali, Jarboui and Ghorbel2011) coastal Tunisia have also showed that this species adapted well to coastal Tunisia.

The most discriminative allometric relationships were total weight to shell height and shell height to inflation since they provided three groupings of populations according to their allometric growth types. While, the allometric relationship involving the nacreous layer thickness, contrary to all expectations, showed any particular distinction within populations. However, the Duncan's multiple comparison test revealed clearly the discriminative character of nacreous layer thickness in P. radiata populations from coastal Tunisia and highlighted, thus, its use as a morphometric character in differentiation between pearl oysters populations.

A large variability in allometric growth among P. radiata populations was detected, with high correlation between linear shell characters and between linear and ponderal ones. However, the allometric distinction of P. radiata populations shows no clear relatedness to their geographical distributions. On the other hand, the detection of the lowest values of correlation coefficient, in all cases, in populations from Ajim and La Marsa suggest their distinction from the other populations.

The morphological analysis revealed an important heterogeneity within P. radiata populations. In fact, most of them consisted of large-sized and juvenile individuals indicating that this pearl oyster had found an adequate environment for both growth and reproduction. The results of our study provided further evidence that the pearl oyster P. radiata exhibited a shell morphological variability, which is consistent with the findings of Beaumont & Khamdan (Reference Beaumont and Khamdan1991) and of Al-Sayed et al. (Reference Al-Sayed, Al-Rumaihi and Al-Rumaidhm1993). The observed variability in shell morphology and allometric growth among P. radiata populations may have arisen due to differences of the local conditions and the environmental factors between sites, notably salinity, wave action and temperature which affected molluscs development and survival (Parache & Massé, Reference Parache and Massé1987; O'Connor & Lawler, Reference O'Connor and Lawler2004). It may be also associated with population density and availability of food resources which affect the growth rate. In fact, numerous investigations have concluded that growth of low density populations is more important than that of high density populations characterized by more competition for food (Zanette & Deslous-Paoli, Reference Zanette and Deslous-Paoli1983; Brown & Hartwick, Reference Brown and Hartwick1988; White et al., Reference White, Englar and Carswell1990). Moreover, it has been demonstrated that the type of sediment (Newell & Hidou, Reference Newell and Hidou1982) and bottom (Claxton et al., Reference Claxton, Wilson, Mackie and Boulding1998) as well as burrowing behaviour ability and efficiency influence shell morphology and relative growth of many bivalve species (Eagar, Reference Eagar1978; Seed, Reference Seed, Rhoads and Lutz1980; Costa et al., Reference Costa, Menesatti, Aguzzi, D'Andrea, Antonucci, Rimatori, Pallottino and Mattoccia2010).

The present study revealed that the morphological discrimination of P. radiata populations matches with their geographical distribution. This finding could be related to the environmental and ecological conditions of stations. In fact, the morphological distinction of the P. radiata population from Ajim (south of Tunisia) by the D2 and the MDS analyses of shell metric (Figures 5A & 6A) and weight (Figures 5B & 6B) characters could be due to the particular environment of the Ajim site as an intertidal zone. This result supports the allometric distinction of the Ajim population. In addition, all sampled P. radiata specimens along coastal Tunisia had similar shell shape and colour, except those from the Ajim population which were less dark than the others. Several studies suggest that the variation of shell shape and colour in oysters is genetically controlled (Imai & Sakai, Reference Imai and Sakai1961; Wada, Reference Wada1994; Brake et al., Reference Brake, Evans and Langdon2004; Batista et al., Reference Batista, Ben-Hamadou, Fonseca, Taris, Ruano, Reis-Henriques and Boudry2008). In the case of the Ajim population, the high and low tide marks might affect the morphology of P. radiata individuals; an ecomorphosis of adaptation to environmental stress can, thus, occur.

The discrimination of the P. radiata population from La Marsa by the D2 and the MDS analyses of shell metric (Figures 5A & 6A) and weight (Figures 5B & 6B) characters can be explained by the fact that La Marsa is the only site among all those sampled which is located on the north coast of Tunisia and, therefore, has particular environmental conditions. This finding supports the discrimination of the La Marsa population pointed out by the allometric growth study.

The grouping of P. radiata populations from Kerkennah Island, Sfax, Maharès, Skhira and Djerba by the squared D2 and the MDS analysis of shell metric parameters (Figures 5A & 6A) could be due to the geographical relatedness of these sites. In fact, all of them are located in the Gulf of Gabès, south-eastern Tunisia. This result suggests that these populations have the same origin. Taking in consideration that the Gulf of Gabès is located in the south-eastern part of the Mediterranean Sea, the grouping of the Gulf of Gabès populations is in agreement with Zenetos et al. (Reference Zenetos, Koutsoubas and Vardala-Theodorou2004), who reported that P. radiata was described as one of the very first exotic mollusc species in the Mediterranean Sea which it entered via the Suez Canal thus colonizing its eastern part. Besides, Pinctada radiata is abundant in the Levantine Basin (Barash & Danin, Reference Barash and Danin1992) and has spread as far west as the Tyrrhenian Sea, as well as off Sicily, Malta, Pantellaria Island and France (Tomlin, Reference Tomlin1927; Sabelli, Reference Sabelli1969; Zibrowius, Reference Zibrowius1992; Di Natale, Reference Di Natale1982; Ricordi, Reference Ricordi1993). However, Monterosato (Reference Monterosato1899) reported a century ago that the thriving establishment of P. radiata in the Gulf of Gabès, where it formed large banks, made him cast doubts about the idea of its progressive penetration through the Suez Canal suggesting therefore that the P. radiata species was indigenous to the Mediterranean Sea. On the other hand, Galil & Zenetos (Reference Galil, Zenetos, Leppäkoski, Olenin and Gollasch2002) reported that the lessepsian invaders exhibited a rapid geographical spread and successful establishment. In this regard, Oliverio (Reference Oliverio1995) concluded that the term lessepsian migrant should not be used indiscriminately for any species of Indo-Pacific origin found in the Mediterranean Sea.

The distinction of the P. radiata population of Kerkennah Island from the Gulf of Gabès grouping by the squared Mahalanobis distances (D2) and the MDS analyses of shell weight parameters (Figures 5B & 6B) proves that Kerkennah Island have particular abiotic and trophic conditions. Indeed, many deep channels bordering the high depth of Kerkennah Island may contribute to its nutritive enrichment.

The grouping of P. radiata populations from the three sampled harbours (Hammamet, Monastir and Zarzis) by both D2 and MDS analyses of morphometric characters could be obvious since the harbours have almost the same ecological conditions but not necessarily the same environmental ones. This result indicates that these populations might have the same origin and suggests that shipping is a vector for the introduction of P. radiata in Tunisian waters. Ship-related introductions included ballast waters, solid ballast and fouling. Similarly, Zenetos et al. (Reference Zenetos, Koutsoubas and Vardala-Theodorou2004) reported that the recent finding of the Indo-Pacific bivalve Fulvia fragilis in Saronikos Gulf and in particular in Peiraias port suggested its transport via shipping although the species seemed to be lessepsian migrant. Furthermore, the P. radiata population from Hammamet harbour seemed to be particular for numerous reasons. Firstly, it represented an illustrative example of heterogeneity among all sampled populations, exhibiting the high frequencies of both larger sized (77.36%) and juveniles (5.66%) specimens. Secondly, the P. radiata population from Hammamet had the highest mean size in shell length (72.71 mm). Finally, the largest size specimen of P. radiata recorded at least in Tunisia and elsewhere was found at Hammamet harbour and was about 104.37 mm shell length which was larger than those observed for P. radiata populations from El Biban lagoon (85 mm) (Seurat, Reference Seurat1929), Kerkennah Island (74 mm) (Tlig-Zouari & Zaouali, Reference Tlig Zouari and Zaouali1998), Bizerta lagoon (Njila) (100.51 mm) (Tlig-Zouari et al., Reference Tlig-Zouari, Rabaoui, Irathni and Ben Hassine2009), the eastern Mediterranean (64 mm) and the Red Sea (93.2 mm) (Yassien, Reference Yassien1998; Yassien et al., Reference Yassien, Abdel-Razek and Kilada2000). These findings suggest that even if shipping is not the only vector for introduction of P. radiata species in Hammamet harbour, it may be involved in combination with lessepsian migration in the settlement of the Hammamet population. According to Galil & Zenetos (Reference Galil, Zenetos, Leppäkoski, Olenin and Gollasch2002) shipping and then aquaculture are the next major introduction vectors for exotic marine biota in the eastern Mediterranean besides the introduction through the Suez Canal. Moreover, a combination of two modes of P. radiata introduction was assumed in the Mediterranean Sea particularly in Greek waters where, despite the P. radiata intentional introduction for aquaculture, the lessepsian mode of its introduction was not excluded (Zenetos et al., Reference Zenetos, Koutsoubas and Vardala-Theodorou2004).

In conclusion, the conventional morphometric methods and the statistical analyses used in this investigation reveal that the invasive pearl oyster P. radiata from coastal Tunisia displayed an important variability in shell morphology and growth. Unlike the allometric growth differentiation, morphological discrimination of P. radiata populations shows geographical distinction. Two hypotheses can explain the recorded variability: (1) a plastic response of P. radiata species to different environmental and/or ecological conditions; and (2) a difference in origins of P. radiata populations. Further genetic studies are required to understand the cause of morphometric differences within and among P. radiata populations from coastal Tunisia.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was funded by grants from the «Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur, de la Recherche Scientifique et de la Technologie de la Tunisie». It was supported by the project VRR Nacre (VRROI-05). We thank the anonymous referees for their valuable remarks.

References

REFERENCES

Allen, E.G. (2006) New approaches to Fourier analysis of ammonoid sutures and other complex, open curves. Paleobiology 32, 299315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Madfa, H., Abdel-Moati, M.A.R. and Al-Gimaly, F.H. (1998) Pinctada radiata (pearl oyster): a bioindicator for metal pollution monitoring in the Qatari waters (Arabian Gulf). Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 60, 245251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Matar, S., Carpenter, K.E., Jackson, R., Al-Hazeem, S.H., AL-Saffar, A.H., Abdulghaffar, A.R. and Carpenter, C. (1993) Observations on the pearl oyster fishery of Kuwait. Journal of Shellfish Research 12, 3539.Google Scholar
Al-Sayed, H.A., Al-Rumaihi, E.M. and Al-Rumaidhm, M.J. (1993) Some morphometric measurements and population structure of the pearl oyster Pinctada radiata at two different coasts in Bahrain. Bahrain Center for Studies and Scientific Research Department (Report), 17 pp.Google Scholar
Anwar, N.A, Richardson, C.A. and Seed, R. (1990) Age determination, growth rate and population structure of the horse mussel Modiolus modiolus. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 70, 441457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barash, A. and Danin, Z. (1992) Fauna Palaestina. Mollusca 1: annotated list of Mediterranean Molluscs of Israel and Sinai. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Science and Humanities, 405 pp.Google Scholar
Batista, F.M., Ben-Hamadou, R., Fonseca, V.G., Taris, N., Ruano, F., Reis-Henriques, M.A. and Boudry, P. (2008) Comparative study of shell shape and muscle scar pigmentation in the closely related cupped oysters Crassostrea angulata, C. gigas and their reciprocal hybrids. Aquatic Living Resources 21, 3138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaumont, A. and Khamdan, S.A.A. (1991) Electrophoretic and morphometric characters in population differentiation of the pearl oyster Pinctada radiata (Leach) from around Bahrain. Journal of Molluscan Studies 57, 433441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchon-Brandely, M. and Berthoule, A. (1891) Les pêches maritimes en Algérie et en Tunisie. Paris: Librairie Militaire de L. Baudoin, 118 pp.Google Scholar
Brake, J., Evans, F. and Langdon, C. (2004) Evidence for genetic control of pigmentation of shell and mantle edge in selected families of Pacific oysters, Crassostrea gigas. Aquaculture 229, 8998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J.R and Hartwick, E.B. (1988) A habitat suitability index model for suspended tray culture of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas Thunberg. Aquaculture Research 19, 109126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carino, M. and Monteforte, M. (1995) History of pearling in La Paz Bay, south Baja California. Gems and Gemology 2, 88105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claxton, W.T., Wilson, A.B., Mackie, G.L. and Boulding, E.G. (1998) A genetic and morphological comparison of shallow- and deepwater populations of the introduced dreissenid bivalve Dreissena bugensis. Canadian Journal of Zoology 76, 12691276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colgan, D.J. and Ponder, W.F. (2002) Genetic discrimination of morphologically similar sympatric species of pearl oysters (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Pinctada) in eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Marine Freshwater Research 53, 697709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, C., Menesatti, P., Aguzzi, J., D'Andrea, S., Antonucci, F.Rimatori, V., Pallottino, F. and Mattoccia, M. (2010) External shape differences between sympatric populations of commercial clams Tapes decussatus and T. philippinarum. Food and Bioprocess Technology 3, 4348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Mora, S., Fowler, S.W., Wyse, E. and Azemard, S. (2004) Distribution of heavy metals in marine bivalves, fish and coastal sediments in the Gulf and Gulf of Oman. Marine Pollution Bulletin 49, 410424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derbali, A., Jarboui, O. and Ghorbel, M. (2011) Distribution, abundance and population structure of Pinctada radiata (Mollusca: Bivalvia) in southern Tunisian waters (central Mediterranean). Cahiers de Biologie Marine 52, 2331.Google Scholar
Di Natale, A. (1982) Extra-Mediterranean species of Mollusca along the southern Italian coasts. Malacologia 22, 571580.Google Scholar
Eagar, R.M.C. (1978) Shape and function of the shell: a comparison of some living and fossil bivalve mussels. Biological Review 53, 169210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferson, S.F., Rohlf, F.J. and Koehn, R.K. (1985) Measuring shape variation of two-dimensional outlines. Systematic Zoology 34, 5968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, W., Schnneider, M. and Baichat, M.L. (1987) Fiches FAO d'identification des espèces pour les besoins de la pêche. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Galil, B. (2000) A sea under siege—alien species in the Mediterranean. Biological Invasions 2, 177186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galil, B. and Zenetos, A. (2002) A sea change—exotics in the Eastern Mediterranean. In Leppäkoski, E., Olenin, S. and Gollasch, S. (eds) Invasive aquatic species of Europe: distributions, impacts and management. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 325336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gervis, M.H. and Sims, N.A. (1992) The biology and culture of pearl oysters (Bivalvia: Pteriidae). International Centre for Living Aquatic Resources Management (ICLARM) Studies and Reviews 21, 49 pp.Google Scholar
Harry, H.W. (1985) Synopsis of the supraspecific classification of living oysters (Bivalvia: Gryphaeidae and Ostreidae). Veliger 28, 121158.Google Scholar
Herdman, W.A. and Hornell, J. (1903) Observations and experiments on the life history and habits of the pearl oyster. Reports of the Pearl Oyster Fisheries of the Gulf of Mannar 1, 125146.Google Scholar
Hynd, J.S. (1955) A revision of the Australian pearl-shells, genus Pinctada (Lamellibranchia). Australian Journal of Marine Freshwater Research 6, 98137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, T. and Sakai, S. (1961) Study of breeding of Japanese oyster, Crassostrea gigas. Tohoku Journal of Agricultural Research 12, 125171.Google Scholar
Innes, D. J. and Bates, A. (1999) Morphological variation of Mytilus edulis and Mytilus trossulus in eastern Newfoundland. Marine Biology 133, 691–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ktari-Chakroun, F. and Azouz, A. (1971) Les fonds chalutables de la région Sud-Est de la Tunisie (golfe de Gabès). Bulletin de l'Institut d'Océanographie et de Pêche de Salammbô 2, 547.Google Scholar
Lawrence, D.R. (1995) Diagnosis of the genus Crassostrea (Bivalvia, Ostreidae). Malacologia 36, 185202.Google Scholar
Madec, L. and Daguzan, J. (1993) Geographic variation in reproductive traits of Helix aspersa Müller studied under laboratory conditions. Malacologia 35, 99117.Google Scholar
Martinez-Fernandez, E., Acosta Salmon, H., Rangel-Davalos, C., Olivera, A., Ruiz-Rubio, H. and Romo-Pinera, A.K. (2003) Spawning and larval culture of the pearl oyster Pinctada mazatlanica (Hanley, 1856) in the laboratory. World Aquaculture 34, 3639.Google Scholar
Matlins, A.L. (1996) The pearl book: the definitive buying guide. Woodstock, VT: Gemstone Press, 198 pp.Google Scholar
Meng, Z., Li, Y. and Xing, K. (1996) Theory and techniques on pearl culture. Beijing, China: Science Press.Google Scholar
Milet, C., Berland, S., Lamghari, M., Mouries, L., Jolly, C., Borzeix, S., Doumenc, D. and Lopez, E. (2004) Conservation of signal molecules involved in biomineralisation control in calcifying matrices of bone and shell. Comptes Rendus Palevol 3, 493501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohammed, S.Z. and Yassien, M.H. (2003) Population parameters of the pearl oyster Pinctada radiata (Leach, 1814) in Qatari waters, Arabian Gulf. Turkish Journal of Zoology 27, 339343.Google Scholar
Monterosato, T.A. (1878) Enumerazione e sinonimia delle conchiglie Mediterranee. Giornale di Scienze Naturali ed Economiche di Palermo 13, 61113.Google Scholar
Monterosato, T.A. (1899) Coquilles marins de chypre. Journal de Conchyliologie 57, 392397.Google Scholar
Newell, C.R. and Hidou, H. (1982) The effects of sediment type on growth rate and shell allometry in the soft shelled clam Mya arenaria (L). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 65, 285295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, W.A and Lawler, N.F. (2004) Reproductive condition of the pearl oyster, Pinctada imbricata (Roding), in Port Stephens, New South Wales (Australia). Aquaculture Research 35, 385396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliverio, M., Gerosa, G. and Cocco, M. (1992) First record of Pinctada radiata (Bivalvia: Pteriidae) epibionte on the loggerhead turtle Caretta caretta (Chelonia: Cheloniidae). Bollettino Malacologico 28, 149152.Google Scholar
Oliverio, M. (1995) The status of the living Mediterranean Strombus, or: what is a lessepsian migrant? Notiziario del CISMA 16, 3540.Google Scholar
Palmer, M., Pons, G.X. and Linde, M. (2004) Discriminating between geographical groups of a Mediterranean commercial clam [Chamelea gallina (L): Veneridae] by shape analysis. Fisheries Research 67, 9398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parache, A. and Massé, H. (1987) Influence des facteurs du milieu sur le cycle biologique de Mytilus galloprovincialis (Lamarck) en élevage sur corde dans l'Anse de Carteau (côte méditerranéenne française. Haliotis 16, 137147.Google Scholar
Por, F.D. (1978) Lessepsian migration—the influx of Red Sea biota into the Mediterranean Sea by way of the Suez Canal. Ecological Studies 23, 1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Por, F.D. (1990) Lessepsian migration. An appraisal and new data. Bulletin de l'Institut Océanographique, Monaco 7, 110.Google Scholar
Ranson, G. (1961) Les espèces d'huîtres perlières du genre Pinctada (Biologie de quelques unes d'entre elles). Mémoires de l'Institut des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique 2, 195.Google Scholar
Ricordi, P. (1993) Segnelazione di Pinctada radiata (Leach, 1814) per il Tirreno meridionale. Notizario SIM 11, 4142.Google Scholar
Rufino, M.M., Gaspar, M.B., Pereira, A.M. and Vasconcelos, P. (2006) Use of shape to distinguish Chamelea gallina and Chamelea striatula (Bivalvia: Veneridae): linear and geometric morphometric methods. Journal of Morphology 267, 14331440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sabelli, B. (1969) Ritrovamenti malacologici a Pantellaria e nei banchi de pesca tunisini. Conchiglie 5, 311.Google Scholar
Seed, R. (1980) Shell growth and form in Bivalvia. In Rhoads, D.C. and Lutz, R.A. (eds) Skeletal growth of aquatic organisms. Biological records of environmental change. New York: Plenum, pp. 2367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seurat, L.G. (1929) La petite Pintadine du Golfe de Gabes. Bulletin de la Station d'Aquaculture et de Pêche de Castiglione 1, 928.Google Scholar
Shirai, S. (1994) Pearls and pearl oysters of the world. Marine Planning Company, Okinawa, Japan, 108 pp.Google Scholar
Stenzel, H.B. (1971) Oysters. In Moore, K.C. (ed.) Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Part N. Volume 3. Mollusca 6. Geological Society of America Inc, Boulder, Colorado and the University of Kansas, Lawrence, pp. N935N1224.Google Scholar
Tlig Zouari, S. and Zaouali, J. (1994) Reproduction de Pinctada radiata (Leach, 1814, Mollusque, Bivalve) dans les îles Kerkennah (Tunisie). Marine Life 4, 4145.Google Scholar
Tlig Zouari, S. and Zaouali, J. (1998) Etude de quelques caractères biométriques de Pinctada radiata des îles Kerkenah (Tunisie). Annales de l'Institut Océanographique, Paris 2, 217224.Google Scholar
Tlig-Zouari, S., Rabaoui, L., Irathni, I. and Ben Hassine, O.K. (2009) Distribution, habitat and poulation densities of the invasive species Pinctada radiata (Mollusca: Bivalvia) along the Northern and Eastern coasts of Tunisia. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 50, 131142.Google Scholar
Tomlin, J.R. (1927) Report on the Mollusca (Amphineura, Gastropoda, Scaphopoda, Pelecypoda). Transactions of the Zoological Society of London 22, 291320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vassel, E. (1899) La Pintadine de Vaillant et l'acclimatation de la mère perle sur le littoral tunisien. Journal de Conchyliologie 57, 416419.Google Scholar
Wada, K.T. (1994) Genetics of pearl oyster in relation to aquaculture. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly 28, 276282.Google Scholar
White, J.N.C., Englar, J.R. and Carswell, B.L. (1990) Biochemical composition and energy reserves in Crassostrea gigas exposed to different levels of nutrition. Aquaculture 90, 157172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yassien, M.H. (1998) Biological and ecological studies on the pearl oyster Pinctada radiata (Mollusca, Lamellibranchia) from the Red Sea with special reference to its tolerance to water pollution. PhD thesis. Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University.Google Scholar
Yassien, M.H., Abdel-Razek, F.A. and Kilada, R.W. (2000) Growth estimates of the pearl oyster Pinctada radiata from the Eastern Mediterranean. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries 4, 105118.Google Scholar
Yu, D.H. and Chu, K.H. (2006) Low genetic differentiation among widely separated populations of the pearl oyster Pinctada fucata as revealed by AFLP. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 333, 140146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanette, Y. and Deslous-Paoli, J.M. (1983) Intérêt du préélevage de l'huître Crassostrea gigas en claire. Sciences et Pêches. Bulletin de l'Institut des Pêches Maritimes 333, 1115.Google Scholar
Zaouali, J. (1978) Les peuplements malacologiques de la mer de Bou Grara. Bulletin de l'Institut d'Océanographie et de Pêche de Salammbô 3, 107142.Google Scholar
Zaouali, J. and Beaten, S. (1985) Etude des peuplements macrobentiques de la zone centrale et du bassin oriental de la mer des Bibans (Tunisie méridionale) par la méthode de l'analyse factorielle des correspondances. Rapport de la Commission Internationale de la Mer Méditerranée 29, 199203.Google Scholar
Zenetos, A., Koutsoubas, D. and Vardala-Theodorou, E. (2004) Origin and vectors of introduction of exotic molluscs in Greek waters. Belgian Journal of Zoology 134, 161168.Google Scholar
Zibrowius, H. (1992) Ongoing modifications on the Mediterranean marine fauna and flora by the establishment of exotic species. Mesogée 51, 83107.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Distribution map of sampling sites for the pearl oyster Pinctada radiata on coastal Tunisia: La Marsa, Hammamet, Monastir, Sfax, Kerkennah Island, Maharès, Skhira, Ajim, Djerba and Zarzis.

Figure 1

Table 1. Pinctada radiata populations from coastal Tunisia: sampling sites, total number of individuals, mean shell height and thickness of nacreous layer.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. (A) Shell valve of the pearl oyster Pinctada radiata showing the section axis through the nacre surface and the four points (A,B, C and D) at which nacre thickness was measured; (B) a stereomicrograph of sectioned valve showing thickness of nacreous layer of P. radiata (63 ×).

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Frequency distribution of shell height (H) of the pearl oyster Pinctada radiata from coastal Tunisia (N = 693).

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Allometric relationships between shell morphometric characters of the pearl oyster Pinctada radiata from coastal Tunisia. (A) Shell height to shell width (H-W); (B) shell height to inflation (H-R); (C) inflation to shell width (R-W); (D) total weight to shell height (TW-H); (E) shell weight to shell height (SW-H); (F) nacreous layer thickness to shell height (TN-H).

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Dendrograms of Mahalanobis distances using metric (A) and weight ratios (B) for Pinctada radiata populations from coastal Tunisia.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Multidimensional scaling plots of metric (A) and weight ratios (B) for Pinctada radiata populations from coastal Tunisia.

Figure 7

Table 2. The mean values of morphometric ratios for the pearl oyster Pinctada radiata from coastal Tunisia. The F statistic contrasting the ratios and the correlation between sites are significant (P < 0.05).