Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T10:22:07.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case report and review of the literature: the utilisation of a ventricular assist device as bridge to recovery for anthracycline-induced ventricular dysfunction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2017

Diane Krasnopero*
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins All Children’s Heart Institute, Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital, St. Petersburg, Florida, United States of America
Alfred Asante-Korang
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins All Children’s Heart Institute, Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital, St. Petersburg, Florida, United States of America
Jeffrey Jacobs
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins All Children’s Heart Institute, Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital, St. Petersburg, Florida, United States of America Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Stacie Stapleton
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins All Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorder Institute, Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital, St. Petersburg, Florida, United States of America
Jennifer Carapellucci
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins All Children’s Heart Institute, Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital, St. Petersburg, Florida, United States of America
Mathew Dotson
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins All Children’s Heart Institute, Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital, St. Petersburg, Florida, United States of America
Gary Stapleton
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins All Children’s Heart Institute, Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital, St. Petersburg, Florida, United States of America
*
Correspondence to: D. Krasnopero, DNP, Johns Hopkins All Children’s Heart Institute, Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital 601 5th Street South, Suite 206, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, United States of America. Tel: 727 767 3333; Fax: 727 767 8990; E-mail: dkrasno1@jhmi.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ventricular assist devices are used in children with heart failure as a bridge to myocardial recovery or cardiac transplantation. Anthracyclines cause cardiac toxicity and may result in acute or long-term cardiac failure. We describe the use of a ventricular assist device as a bridge to recovery in a child with severe acute anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy, and we review the associated literature. A 6-year-old girl was treated for acute myeloblastic leukaemia with daunorubicin and mitoxantrone. After 2 weeks her final dose of chemotherapy, her Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction decreased to 21%. Despite initiation of medical therapy, she had continued deterioration of left ventricular function and developed evidence of poor end-organ perfusion. She was not a candidate for cardiac transplantation, as the post-transplant immune suppression therapy would put her at risk for recurrence of her malignancy. We placed her on a short-term ventricular assist device as a bridge to ultimately placing her on a long-term ventricular assist device versus continuing medical therapy. Her left ventricular ejection fraction improved to 55% 24 days after ventricular assist device insertion. She was separated from the ventricular assist device 26 days after its insertion. She was discharged home 29 days later and is now 28 months after ventricular assist device implantation with stable ventricular function, as documented by a left ventricular ejection fraction of 55%, and normal end organ function. This case is one of the only reports known describing successful use of a short-term ventricular assist device as a bridge to recovery in a child with severe acute anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Background

Ventricular assist devices have been used in patients with cardiac failure as a bridge to myocardial recovery, destination therapy, or cardiac transplantation. As technology has evolved, allowing ventricular assist devices to be used in smaller patients, their use in children is increasing. Anthracyclines and anthracenediones can cause cardiac toxicity and may result in acute and chronic congestive heart failure. We describe the use of a left ventricular assist device as a bridge to recovery in a child with severe acute anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy, and we review the associated literature.

Case

A 6-year-old girl was treated for acute myeloblastic leukaemia according to the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) AAML1031 protocol, 1 receiving four cycles of chemotherapy from December, 2013 to April, 2014, with a combination of cytarabine, etoposide, daunorubicin, and mitoxantrone, with a cumulative doxorubicin isotoxic dose of 381.6 mm/m2 (body surface area was 0.9 m2). She underwent serial echocardiograms during her treatment, documenting normal left ventricular dimensions and systolic function, with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 60–72%. After 80 days completing her final dose of chemotherapy, a routine echocardiogram showed her left ventricular ejection fraction to be 44%, and she was started on oral enalapril and furosemide. Over the next 9 days, she developed increased work of breathing and shortness of breath. A repeat echocardiogram showed a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction to 21%. She was then started on a milrinone infusion and intravenous furosemide. Viral polymerase chain reaction was positive for Human Herpesvirus 6, 922 copies, and she was treated with a total of 2 g/kg of intravenous immunoglobulin over four doses for possible viral myocarditis. Despite these treatments, by post-chemotherapy day 25, she had continued deterioration of left ventricular systolic function with an ejection fraction of <10%. She had evidence of poor end-organ perfusion, with respiratory failure, decreased urine output (<2 ml/kg/hour), and hepatic dysfunction (transaminases >2000), although her right ventricular systolic function by echocardiography was normal. An urgent multidisciplinary conference was held to obtain consensus about treatment for her cardiac failure. As she had just completed chemotherapy, she was not considered a candidate for cardiac transplantation, as the post-transplant immune suppression therapy would put her at significant risk for recurrence of her malignancy. However, she had a favourable prognosis for her malignancy, because the overall survival of acute myeloblastic leukaemia is 60–80%, and event-free survival is 45–55%. After multidisciplinary discussion, we elected to place her on a short-term left ventricular assist device, which is approved for up to 30 days. This would provide a time period of cardiac stability to allow her to either recover or become a good candidate for a longer-term ventricular assist device.

Our patient was placed on a CentriMag (Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, California, United States of America) continuous-flow device on post-chemotherapy day 31. While on the ventricular assist device, we were able to provide a cardiac index of 2.5 to 2.8 litres per minute. The anticoagulation regimen we used for this patient included unfractionated heparin with target activated clotting time of 160 to 180 and activated partial thromboplastin time of 1.5 to 2 times control. After 48 hours, she was also started on anti-platelet therapy with aspirin, and platelet function was monitored with thromboelastography with platelet mapping, with aspirin doses adjusted using the Edmonton protocol.Reference Baumann Kreuziger 2 , 3 On ventricular assist device day 2, she required initiation of inhaled nitric oxide for right ventricular support because of echocardiographic evidence of right ventricular dilatation and dysfunction. Milrinone and low-dose Epinephrine (0.03 mcg/kg/minute) infusions were also continued for right ventricular support, and she was eventually transitioned from nitric oxide to tadalafil for pulmonary vasodilatation. She showed recovery of end-organ perfusion with decreased liver transaminase levels (<100) and improved renal function. She was extubated after 8 days on the ventricular assist device. She developed ectopic atrial tachycardia that required discontinuation of the low-dose epinephrine and initiation of amiodarone to treat the arrhythmia. The left ventricular systolic function gradually improved, and 24 days after ventricular assist device implantation her left ventricular ejection fraction was 55%. Subsequently, the ventricular assist device flows were gradually weaned under echocardiographic surveillance, and left ventricular ejection fraction remained above 50% with these trials. On ventricular assist device day 26, she was re-started on epinephrine 0.05 mcg/kg/minute and milrinone 1 mcg/kg/minute in preparation for decannulation. She was then successfully separated from the ventricular assist device. She was discharged home 29 days after ventricular assist device explantation (86 days after chemotherapy completion) on aspirin, carvedilol, digoxin, enalapril, furosemide, spironolactone, tadalafil, levocarnitine, and ubiquinone. She has been home for 28 months after ventricular assist device implantation with stable left ventricular ejection fraction of 55–60% and with normal end organ function, including pulmonary, renal, hepatic, and neurological function.

Discussion

Anthracyclines have significant antitumour activity, play a major role in combination chemotherapy, and are used in over 50% of paediatric protocols.Reference Smith, Cornelius and Plummer 4 However, one of the potentially serious side effects of anthracyclines is cardiotoxicity, as they can cause irreversible cardiac injury by causing myocardial cell death. A cumulative dose of greater than 550 mg/m2 has a significantly increased risk of anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy; however, cardiomyopathy may occur at even much lower doses. Anthracyclines can cause asymptomatic cardiac dysfunction with decreased left ventricular contractility, or evidence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Symptoms of clinical heart failure include pulmonary and peripheral oedema, dyspnoea, poor feeding, hepatomegaly, and decreased exercise tolerance.Reference Harake, Franco, Henkel, Miller and Lipshultz 5 , Reference Krischer, Epstein, Cuthbertson, Goorin, Epstein and Lipshultz 6 Early or acute toxicity occurs during therapy or in the 1st year following therapy, whereas late cardiotoxicity occurs at least 1 year after the completion of therapy.Reference Harake, Franco, Henkel, Miller and Lipshultz 5 Reference van Dalen, van der Pal, Bakker, Caron and Kremer 7 No specific treatment exists for anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity other than supportive care, although some patients show variable recovery of ventricular function with conventional medical therapy for heart failure.

Mitoxantrone hydrochloride, an anthracenedione, is a non-cell-cycle-specific anthraquinone derivative, which has demonstrated significant antitumour activity similar to anthracyclines; unfortunately, in clinical studies, mitoxantrone has been shown to cause anthracycline-like cardiotoxicity.Reference Gharib and Burnett 8 , Reference Posner, Dukart, Goldberg, Bernstein and Cartwright 9 In a systematic review of 17 cohort studies, Van Dalen et al reported a cumulative incidence of mitoxantrone-induced cardiomyopathy ranging from 0 to 6.7% for clinical heart failure and from 0 to 80% for asymptomatic cardiac dysfunction.Reference van Dalen, van der Pal, Bakker, Caron and Kremer 7 These findings compare to a cumulative incidence of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity ranging from 0 to 16% for symptomatic heart failure and from 0 to 57% for asymptomatic cardiac dysfunction.

Ventricular assist devices may serve as a bridge to recovery, as a bridge to transplantation, or for permanent cardiac support.Reference Shann, Giacomuzzi and Harness 10 The use of ventricular assist devices in children has been described as a bridge to cardiac transplantation or recovery of ventricular function in various forms of paediatric heart failure.Reference Cooper and Pretre 11 Reference Wilmot, Lorts and Morales 15 There are short-term and long-term ventricular assist devices that are available based upon the patient’s size and presumed duration of therapy. Short-term devices are typically used for up to 14 days, but can used for up to 30 days. Jefferies et al discussed the use of a short-term device as a bridge to decision, during which time the patients have an opportunity to recover or have their transplant candidacy determined.Reference Thiagarajan, Almond, Cooper and Morales 14 If there is no sufficient recovery while on the short-term device, the patient can be transitioned to a long-term device.Reference Cooper and Pretre 11 , Reference Thiagarajan, Almond, Cooper and Morales 14 , Reference Wilmot, Lorts and Morales 15 The determination of appropriate timing of transition from a short-term ventricular assist device to a long-term ventricular assist device may be challenging. This transition is often made between 14 and 30 days after insertion of the short-term ventricular assist device, and is often guided by the clinical status of the patient, as well as the presence or absence of evidence of ventricular recovery. As discussed above, our patient had solid evidence of ventricular recovery by 24 days after implantation of the short-term ventricular assist device; her left ventricular systolic function gradually improved, and by 24 days after implantation of the short-term ventricular assist device her left ventricular ejection fraction was 55%. Therefore, in our patient, because of evidence of progressive ventricular recovery, we elected not to transition to the use of a long-term ventricular assist device.

Successful bridge to recovery with ventricular assist device implantation for anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy has been described in adults.Reference Kurihara, Nishimura and Nawata 16 Very little has been published to date regarding the use of ventricular assist devices in children with anthracycline-induced cardiac toxicity. In 2013 and 2014, Schweiger et al and Cavigelli-Brunner et al published two case reports describing the use of a long-term ventricular assist device in an 8-year-old patient with a body surface area of 0.97 m2 who had severe acute anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy.Reference Schweiger, Dave and Lemme 17 , Reference Cavigelli-Brunner, Schweiger and Knirsch 18 These reports described the implantation of a long-term ventricular assist deviceReference Schweiger, Dave and Lemme 17 and the subsequent successful explantation after recovery.Reference Cavigelli-Brunner, Schweiger and Knirsch 18 In their patient, they implanted a HeartWareTM Ventricular Assist System (https://www.heartware.com/). The patient was discharged home with the ventricular assist device in place after 90 days, and underwent successful explantation at 149 days after implantation. They described their weaning protocol, including performing a right heart catheterisation before explantation. Follow-up on their patient was 4 months after device explanation.

Another report by Freilich et alReference Freilich, Stub and Esmore 19 describes the clinical course of a 16-year-old girl in remission from lymphoma who developed cardiogenic shock owing to a severe anthracycline cardiomyopathy. The patient was initially stabilised using central extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, followed by conversion to a left ventricular assist device. Unexpected evidence of cardiac recovery 9 months after implantation allowed for weaning from the left ventricular assist device over three months with successful device explantation one year after implantation. The authors reported that the patient was alive 18 months after explantation in New York Heart Association class I, on conventional heart failure medical management and metabolic therapy.

In our patient, we presumed that her cardiomyopathy and heart failure was caused by acute anthracycline cardiotoxicity, because of the proximity of her prior chemotherapy. Her course may have also been complicated by viral myocarditis from Human Herpesvirus 6, although her condition continued to deteriorate despite treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin and optimisation of therapy for cardiac failure. The use of a short-term ventricular assist device afforded us the opportunity to support this patient, and allow for potential recovery of left ventricular function. Our original plan was to use the ventricular assist device for up to 30 days – as approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the Centrimag device – as a bridge to recovery and explantation, versus decision to convert to a longer-term ventricular assist device as a bridge to cardiac transplantation when her risk of recurrence of malignancy was considered acceptable to proceed. Fortunately, our patient showed recovery of left ventricular function, evidenced by improved left ventricular ejection fraction, decreased left ventricular end diastolic diameter, as well as normalisation of end organ function. This enabled us to successfully explant her ventricular assist device.

In addition to standard medical management, mechanical circulatory support, and cardiac transplantation, a variety of other therapeutic strategies have been studied that may be applicable to selected patients with heart failure.Reference Schranz, Akintuerk and Voelkel 20 , Reference Latus, Hachmann and Gummel 21 These strategies include first, reversible pulmonary artery banding in left ventricular-dilated cardiomyopathy with preserved right ventricular function; second, the creation of restrictive inter-atrial communication; third, atrioseptostomy or reverse Potts shunt in pulmonary arterial hypertension; and finally, return to a foetal, parallel circulation by combining atrioseptostomy and reversed Potts shunt with or without placement of a bilateral pulmonary artery banding. Although all of these novel approaches may be beneficial in select patients, the mainstay of therapy for cardiac failure in children and adults is medical management, mechanical circulatory support, and cardiac transplantation.

Conclusion

We describe the use of a short-term ventricular assist device as a bridge to recovery in a child with acute Mitoxantrone cardiotoxicity and possible Human Herpesvirus 6 myocarditis. Our experience suggests that short-term ventricular assist devices may be used in select children with acute anthracycline cardiotoxicity as a bridge to recovery or decision.

Acknowledgements

None.

Authors’ Contributions: Drs S.S., G.S., and A.A.-K. determined that this would be a unique case report to publish. Dr S.S. is the primary Oncologist for this patient. Dr G.S. was the primary Cardiologist for this patient. Dr A.A.-K. is the medical director of the Heart Failure/Transplant program. Dr J.J. is the Chief of Cardiovascular Surgery and Surgical Director of Heart Transplantation and Extracorporeal Life Support Programs. They have reviewed and revised the manuscript. They have approved the final manuscript as submitted. D.K., J.C., and M.D. participated in the care of this patient.

Financial Support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Ethical Standards

Informed consent was obtained from the patient’s family for the use of the ventricular assist device.

References

1. The NIH National Cancer Institute. Bortezomib and sorafenib tosylate in treating patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Retrieved December 23, 2016 from https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/clinical-trials/search/view?cdrid=701850.Google Scholar
2. Baumann Kreuziger, LM. Management of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy in patients with left ventricular assist devices. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2015; 39: 337344.Google Scholar
3. Edmonton Anticoagulation and Platelet Inhibition Protocol. Retrieved December 23, 2016 from http://www.meduniwien.ac.at/kiklipedia/images/9/9a/Edmonton_Protokoll_Antikoagulation.pdf.Google Scholar
4. Smith, LA, Cornelius, VR, Plummer, CJ, et al. Cardiotoxicity of anthracycline agents for the treatment of cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Cancer 2010; 10: 337.Google Scholar
5. Harake, D, Franco, V, Henkel, J, Miller, T, Lipshultz, S. Cardiotoxicity in childhood cancer survivors: strategies for prevention and management. Future Cardiol 2012; 8: 647670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Krischer, JP, Epstein, S, Cuthbertson, DD, Goorin, AM, Epstein, ML, Lipshultz, SE. Clinical cardiotoxicity following anthracycline treatment for childhood cancer: The Pediatric Oncology Group experience. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 15441552.Google Scholar
7. van Dalen, EC, van der Pal, HJH, Bakker, PJM, Caron, HN, Kremer, LCM. Cumulative incidence and risk factors of mitoxantrone-induced cardiotoxicity in children: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer 2003; 40: 643652.Google Scholar
8. Gharib, MI, Burnett, AK. Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity: current practice and prospects of prophylaxis. Eur J Heart Failure 2002; 4: 235242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Posner, LE, Dukart, G, Goldberg, J, Bernstein, T, Cartwright, K. Mitoxantrone: an overview of safety and toxicity. Invest New Drugs 1985; 3: 123132.Google Scholar
10. Shann, KG, Giacomuzzi, CR, Harness, L, et al. Complications relating to perfusion and extracorporeal circulation associated with the treatment of patients with congenital cardiac disease: Consensus Definitions from the Multi-Societal Database Committee for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease. In: 2008 Supplement to Cardiology in the Young: Databases and The Assessment of Complications associated with The Treatment of Patients with Congenital Cardiac Disease, Prepared by: The Multi-Societal Database Committee for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease, Jacobs JP (eds). Cardiol Young, 2008; 18 (Suppl 2): 206–214.Google Scholar
11. Cooper, DS, Pretre, R. Clinical management of pediatric ventricular assist devices. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2013; 14: S27S36.Google Scholar
12. Jefferies, JL, Morales, DL. Mechanical circulatory support in children: bridge to transplant versus recovery. Curr Heart Fail Rep 2012; 9: 236243.Google Scholar
13. O’Connor, MJ, Rossano, JW. Ventricular assist devices in children. Curr Opin Cardiol 2014; 29: 113121.Google Scholar
14. Thiagarajan, RR, Almond, CS, Cooper, DS, Morales, DL. Ventricular assist devices for mechanical circulatory support in children. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2012; 3: 104109.Google Scholar
15. Wilmot, I, Lorts, A, Morales, D. Pediatric mechanical circulatory support. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 46: 391401.Google Scholar
16. Kurihara, C, Nishimura, T, Nawata, K, et al. Successful bridge to recovery with VAD implantation for anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy. J Artif Organs 2011; 14: 249252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Schweiger, M, Dave, H, Lemme, F, et al. Acute chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy treated with intracorporeal left ventricular assist device in an 8-year-old child. ASAIO J 2013; 59: 520522.Google Scholar
18. Cavigelli-Brunner, A, Schweiger, M, Knirsch, W, et al. VAD as bridge to recovery in anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy and HHV6 myocarditis. Pediatrics 2014; 134: e894e899.Google Scholar
19. Freilich, M, Stub, D, Esmore, D, et al. Recovery from anthracycline cardiomyopathy after long-term support with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant 2009; 28: 101103.Google Scholar
20. Schranz, D, Akintuerk, H, Voelkel, NF. ‘End-stage’ heart failure therapy: potential lessons from congenital heart disease: from pulmonary artery banding and interatrial communication to parallel circulation. Heart 2017; 103: 262267.Google Scholar
21. Latus, H, Hachmann, P, Gummel, K, et al. Biventricular response to pulmonary artery banding in children with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Heart Lung Transplant 2016; 35: 934938.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed