Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T12:14:12.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Carbon Isotopes (δ13C and Δ14C) in Shell Carbonate, Conchiolin, and Soft Tissues in Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea Virginica)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2018

Carla S Hadden*
Affiliation:
Center for Applied Isotope Studies, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
Kathy M Loftis
Affiliation:
Center for Applied Isotope Studies, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
Alexander Cherkinsky
Affiliation:
Center for Applied Isotope Studies, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: hadden@uga.edu.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Biogeochemical analyses of eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) are frequently included in environmental monitoring and paleoecological studies because their shells and soft tissues record environmental and dietary signals. Carbon isotopes in the mineral phase of the shell are derived from ambient bicarbonate and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), while organic carbon present in soft tissue is of dietary origin. Mineral-bound organic matter within the carbonate shell matrix (“conchiolin”) is studied less frequently. The purpose of this study was to compare carbon isotope composition (δ13C and Δ14C) of conchiolin to those of shell carbonates and soft tissues in eastern oysters and assess the extent to which conchiolin can provide insight into paleoecological records. Eleven oyster specimens were live-collected from Apalachicola Bay, USA, as well as a set of environmental samples (water, sediment, and terrestrial plants). Overall, the δ13C values in all studied oyster tissue types record environmental signals related to carbon sources, with conchiolin being enriched in 13C by an average of 2.3‰ relative to bulk soft tissues. Δ14C values in oyster shell carbonates generally reflect the marine versus riverine source of DIC, while conchiolin Δ14C values are impacted by variable relative contributions of young and old organic matter. Environmental samples indicate a significantly large difference in Δ14C among sources, from –127‰ in particulate organic matter to approximately +15‰ in DIC. Conchiolin is significantly depleted in 14C relative to other tissue types, by as much as 56.6‰, posing a major obstacle to the use of conchiolin as an alternative material for radiocarbon dating.

Type
Marine & Other Methods
Copyright
© 2018 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

INTRODUCTION

Biogeochemical analyses of mollusks are used frequently in environmental, paleontological, archaeological, and paleoenvironmental studies. Typically, such studies take advantage of the ecological and dietary signals that are recorded in the soft tissues of the animal or the climatic and environmental signals that are recorded in the carbonate mollusk shell. Mineral-bound organic matter within the carbonate shell matrix (“conchiolin”) has, historically, been studied less frequently. The purpose of this study was

  1. 1. to compare carbon isotope signatures (δ13C and Δ14C) in shell carbonate, conchiolin, and soft tissues in eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) from Apalachicola Bay, USA;

  2. 2. to assess the usefulness of oyster conchiolin as an ecological and dietary proxy analogous to soft tissue; and

  3. 3. to evaluate the potential of oyster conchiolin as an alternative material for radiocarbon (14C) dating.

Eastern oyster is considered a “keystone species” for estuarine environments along the eastern coast of North America. It has been an important food resource for native peoples in the region for at least the past 8000 years, and has continued to be an important fishery and food source in historical and modern times. As such, oyster shell middens are a potentially powerful environmental and ecological archive that extend over the entire history of human occupation in eastern North America.

Shell carbonates are in isotopic equilibrium with seawater. δ13C and 14C in aquatic mollusk shells are typically assumed to reflect the carbon isotopic composition of the dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) in the surrounding water, although a small proportion of shell carbon is obtained from metabolism (Tanaka et al. Reference Tanaka, Monaghan and Rye1986; Gillikin et al. Reference Gillikin, Lorrain, Meng and Dehairs2007; McConnaughey and Gillikin Reference McConnaughey and Gillikin2008). Stable carbon analyses of shell carbonates are used in paleothermometry and environmental reconstruction (Jones Reference Jones1983; Kirby et al. Reference Kirby, Soniat and Spero1998; Surge et al. Reference Surge, Lohmann and Goodfriend2003; Gillikin et al. Reference Gillikin, Ridder, Ulens, Elskens, Keppens, Baeyens and Dehairs2005; Harding et al. Reference Harding, Spero, Mann, Herbert and Sliko2010), and even for archaeological reconstructions of human foraging patterns (Andrus and Crowe Reference Andrus and Crowe2000; Andrus and Thompson Reference Andrus and Thompson2012). 14C in biogenic carbonates are typically measured for 14C dating, but also play an important role in modeling carbon cycling in the global ocean (e.g., Druffel Reference Druffel1997; Furla et al Reference Furla, Galgani, Durand and Allemand2000).

δ13C and 14C of organic tissues of animals reflect the isotopic composition of the organic compounds at the base of their food web, with predictable levels of isotopic fractionation during metabolic processes (Peterson and Fry Reference Peterson and Fry1987). Thus, isotopic analyses of animal tissues can be used to investigate the sources of carbon and nitrogen supporting an ecosystem, e.g., terrestrial versus marine, or C3 versus C4 terrestrial plants (DeNiro and Epstein Reference DeNiro and Epstein1978; Rounick and Winterbourn Reference Rounick and Winterbourn1986; Farquhar et al. Reference Farquhar, Elheringer and Kubrick1989). Additionally, 14C has been used to study the introduction of petro-based carbon into marine foodwebs (Chanton et al. Reference Chanton, Cherrier, Wilson, Sarkodee-Adoo, Bosman, Mickle and Graham2012; Cherrier et al. Reference Cherrier, Sarkodee-Adoo, Guilderson and Chanton2014). Filter-feeding bivalves continuously sample local water column conditions through feeding. Carbon isotopes in bivalve soft tissues provide time-integrated information of feeding relationships and carbon flows through aquatic food webs (Peterson and Fry Reference Peterson and Fry1987; Post Reference Post2002; Fukumori et al. Reference Fukumori, Oi, Doi, Takahashi, Okuda, Miller, Kuwae, Miyasaka, Genkai-Kato, Koizumi and Omori2008).

Stable isotopic analyses of conchiolin have been shown to record many of the same environmental and dietary signals as soft tissues (Watanabe et al. Reference Watanabe, Kodama and Fukuda2009; Kashiyama et al. Reference Kashiyama, Ogawa, Chikaraishi, Kashiyama, Sakai, Tanabe and Ohkouchi2010; Ellis et al. Reference Ellis, Herbert and Hollander2014). Conchiolin is tightly bound into the mineral structure, sheltered from the external environment and thus relatively protected from diagenetic alteration (Sykes et al. Reference Sykes, Collins and Walton1995). Ellis and colleagues (Reference Ellis, Herbert and Hollander2014) described a 2‰ enrichment in δ13C in oyster shell conchiolin over bulk soft tissue, suggesting that measurements of both are useful means of assessing carbon sources supporting estuarine production.

In this paper we present data supporting the 2‰ δ13C conchiolin–tissue offset described by Ellis et al. (Reference Ellis, Herbert and Hollander2014). 14C measurements of conchiolin, shell carbonate, and bulk soft tissue of eleven oyster specimens indicate that the nearshore estuarine carbon reservoir is at near-equilibrium with atmosphere, complicating efforts to discern terrestrial from marine influences in shell 14C. Nonetheless, preliminary data suggest that both δ13C and Δ14C in oyster conchiolin reflect variables that are expected to be useful for environmental and archaeological applications.

Oyster Biology

Eastern oysters thrive in a wide range of salinity and temperature regimes, inhabiting estuarine environments from the Gulf of Saint Lawrence to the Yucutan Peninsula. Oysters are sessile filter feeders, drawing water over gills with beating cilia. Suspended plankton, bacteria, detritus particles, etc., are trapped in the mucus of a gill, and from there are transported to the mouth, where they are eaten, digested, and expelled as feces or pseudofeces (Galstoff Reference Galstoff1964; Newell and Jordan Reference Newell and Jordan1983). Gas exchange occurs via the gill plates, one pair on each side, and across their mantles. The mantle is a soft, bisymmetrical membrane that covers the visceral mass. The visceral mass consists of the esophagus, stomach, and intestine embedded in connective tissue. The mantle cavity is filled with seawater, an adaptation to life in the intertidal zone that permits the animal to survive many days of exposure (Galstoff Reference Galstoff1964:68). The adductor muscle controls the opening and closing of two asymmetrical valves.

Adult oyster shells (Figure 1) are composed almost entirely of calcite, with aragonite present in the muscle scars and part of the ligament (Stenzel Reference Stenzel1963). The shells are composed of an outer prismatic layer and an inner foliated layer. The foliated layer has a plywood-like structure consisting of sheets of calcite separated by an organic matrix (Sikes et al. Reference Sikes, Wheeler, Wierzbicki, Dillaman and De Luca1998; Lee and Choi Reference Lee and Choi2007). The organic matrix, conchiolin, contributes typically less than 5% of oyster shell weight (Galstoff Reference Galstoff1964:39) and functions in modulating biomineralization. Two models have been proposed for molluscan shell formation. The matrix model suggests that biomineralization occurs in a matrix of proteins secreted by the mantle. The cellular model posits that crystals are formed in haemocytes and then deposited at the mineralization front (Zhang et al Reference Zhang, Fang, Guo, Li, Luo, Xu, Yang, Zhang, Wang, Qi and Xiong2012). New layers of shell form on the interior surface of the valves, covering previous layers and accreting new shell beyond the margins of previous layers, resulting in terrace-like growth increments (Carriker et al. Reference Carriker, Palmer and Prezant1980).

Figure 1 Live-collected Crassostrea virginica shells from Apalachicola Bay, USA, with aragonitic shell components (R=resilium; Ms=muscle scar) noted. Sample target area indicated with dashed circle.

STUDY AREA

The Apalachicola estuary (Figure 2) has supported a productive oyster industry since the mid-19th century. However, oysters have been the center of the local economy for thousands of years in this region, and this legacy is written on the landscape. Over 60 ancient oyster shell midden sites are known along the bayshore and barrier islands of the Apalachicola estuary, the earliest dating to ca. 3000 BP (White Reference White2014). Oysters are one of the most abundant archaeological materials in this region, making them a potentially important environmental archive.

Figure 2 Map of the study area showing location of four sampling localities in Apalachicola Bay, USA.

The Apalachicola Bay system is a shallow, river-dominated estuary located in the panhandle of Florida, USA. The Apalachicola River is the dominant source of freshwater to the system, with maximum river flow occurring in the late winter to early spring months, highly correlated with the wet season period for the area. Hydrology in the system is influenced by riverine discharge, current flows, and wind. Spatially, the system varies physiochemically in current velocities, salinity, and color, whereas temperature is generally uniform. Bottom water salinities tend to be lowest at Cat Point, as low as ~7‰ during periods of high discharge, where the bar is most impacted by river flow and discharge (Livingston et al. Reference Livingston, Lewis, Woodsum, Niu, Galperin, Huang, Christensen, Monaco, Battista, Klein and Howell2000). Increased salinities are found at sites farther from the river, typically around 20‰ in Indian Lagoon and in excess of 30‰ at Alligator Harbor (Sastry Reference Sastry1963). Thus, the sampling localities were classified as “river-influenced” (Saint Vincent Sound and Cat Point) and “marine-influenced” (Indian Lagoon and Alligator Harbor).

While the Apalachicola River dominates the salinity regime of the system, the river, floodplain, neighboring swamps, and the estuary, together act as significant sources of organic matter. Transport of terrestrial organic matter to the Apalachicola Bay system is influenced by periodic inundation of its floodplain. The Apalachicola floodplain is characterized by bottom-land hardwood and cypress forests, which contribute an increased and substantial amount of organic carbon to the bay system during periods inundation (Elder and Cairns Reference Elder and Cairns1982). These carbon loads are introduced into the system by the river and neighboring swamps, such as Tate’s Hell Swamp (Livingston et al. Reference Livingston, Lewis, Woodsum, Niu, Galperin, Huang, Christensen, Monaco, Battista, Klein and Howell2000). Within the bay system, the distribution of dissolved organic matter (DOM) is regulated by hydrodynamic forces (i.e. wind, river, and tides). Generally, however, terrestrial organic matter predominates proximal to the Apalachicola River mouth. Here, secondary producers, such as oysters, depend on terrestrial organic matter to a greater degree, relative to organisms growing in other locations of the bay system where estuarine primary production is a more important food source (Chanton and Lewis Reference Chanton and Lewis2002).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Live C. virginica samples were harvested in December of 2016 from four sites in the northern Gulf of Mexico, within the Apalachicola Bay system: Indian Lagoon, St. Vincent Sound, Area 1622 (Cat Point), and Alligator Harbor (Figure 2). In April 2017, additional oyster and environmental samples (water, sediment, and terrestrial plants) were collected from Alligator Harbor for comparison.

C. virginica were collected and returned to the lab, where the oysters were shucked. The soft-tissue was rinsed 3 times with DI water, freeze dried and pulverized in a Spex Mill. A subsection of the soft-tissue was treated with cold, 1 N HCl to remove any carbonate salts, centrifuged, rinsed with DI an additional 3 times, and freeze dried. The acid-treated soft tissue samples were then loaded into Pyrex tubes with excess CuO and combusted at 575°C to produce CO2.

The shells were washed exhaustively in DI water with sonication. Each rinse cycle lasted 15 minutes, after which the water was decanted, new DI water added and sonication commenced. The rinsing procedure was repeated until the water was clear and burrowing shrimp were not observed under microscopic evaluation. The inner surface of valves was sampled by carefully scraping the nacre near the hinge using a Dremmel tool, avoiding the ligament. The inorganic and organic fractions were then isolated.

The inorganic shell fraction was sampled by reacting approximately 10 mg of powdered shell with 100% H3PO4 in evacuated reaction vessels to produce CO2. A separate subsection of 50 mg of powdered shell was treated for analysis of the insoluble organic shell fraction, which consists predominately of conchiolin. Powdered shell was acidified with 12 N HCl, thereby removing the carbonate phase and soluble organic molecules, including acid-soluble proteins, soluble amino acids, and carbohydrates. The acidified samples were neutralized by rinsing voluminously with Milli-Q water. The samples, consisting of insoluble organic matter, were then transferred to Pyrex tubes where they were dried and sealed. The samples were combusted at 575°C with excess CuO to produce CO2. In cases with extremely low yields (< 4 μmol CO2), the procedure was repeated with approximately 150 mg of shell to increase sample size. In these cases (UGAMS-27953, -27955, and -27956), the average δ13C and Δ14C values are reported.

Environmental samples included water, sediment, and terrestrial plants from the marine-influenced Alligator Harbor locality. A1-L water sample was split for separate analyses of DIC and suspended organic matter. Approximately 50 mL of water was acidified in 85% H3PO4 in an evacuated flask to recover CO2 from DIC in the seawater. The remaining water sample was filtered through pre-baked glass fiber filters to recover suspended organic matter in the 1–20 μm range, the size particles typically ingested by oysters (Baldwin and Newell Reference Baldwin and Newell1995). The precipitate was treated with cold, 1 N HCl to remove any carbonate salts. The sediment sample was filtered to isolate the 1–20 μm fraction, and treated with 1N HCl at 80°C for one hour to remove carbonates. Plant samples were freeze-dried, pulverized in a Spex mill, and treated with 1 N HCl to remove carbonates. Dried subsamples of the water filtrate, sediment, and plant tissues were loaded into quartz tubes with excess CuO and combusted at 900°C to produce CO2.

CO2 samples were cryogenically purified from the other reaction products and the sample 13C/12C ratios were measured using a MAT-253 stable isotope ratio mass spectrometer and expressed with respect to VPDB, with an error of less than 0.1‰. CO2 samples were catalytically converted to graphite (Cherkinsky et al. Reference Cherkinsky, Culp, Dvoracek and Noakes2010), and graphite 14C/13C ratios were measured in 2017 using the NEC 500 kV Tandem Pelletron accelerator mass spectrometer at the Center for Applied Isotope Studies, University of Georgia, USA. The sample ratios were compared to the ratios measured from oxalic acid I (NBS SRM 4990). Size-matched standards were prepared for conchiolin samples (Cherkinsky et al. Reference Cherkinsky, Prasad and Dvoracek2013). For carbonate samples, Carrara marble (IAEA C1) was used as the background, and travertine (IAEA C2) was used as a secondary standard. 14C values are reported according to Δ14C notation (Stuiver and Polach Reference Stuiver and Polach1977), corrected for natural isotope fractionation using the isotope ratio mass spectrometer value.

Statistical tests were performed in RStudio Version 0.98.507. Pearson’s product-moment correlation tests were used to test for correlations in isotopic values among tissue types. Welch Two-sample t-tests were used to determine whether the mean isotopic values of river-influenced and marine-influenced sampling localities are equal.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Stable Carbon Isotopes (δ13C)

Stable carbon isotope values for shell carbonates, conchiolin, and soft tissues are presented in Table 1 and Figures 3 and 4. Shell carbonate δ13C values span a narrow range, from –2.6‰ to –5.8‰, which is comparable to the DIC value from Alligator Harbor (Table 2), and within the range of DIC values previously reported by Chanton and Lewis (Reference Chanton and Lewis1999) for Apalachicola Bay (–1‰ to –15‰). Soft tissue δ13C values range from –19.8‰ to –25.6‰, similar to the isotopic values reported by Chanton and Lewis (Reference Chanton and Lewis1999) for organic sediment, plankton, and particulates (–22‰ to –32‰), as well as those reported in Table 2. δ13C values of conchiolin and soft tissue are strongly correlated (R=0.90, p<0.001), with conchiolin enriched in 13C by an average of +2.3‰ relative to soft tissue. These findings are consistent with the 2‰ offset reported for this same species by Ellis and colleagues (Reference Ellis, Herbert and Hollander2014). The 2‰ depletion in tissue relative to conchiolin may be indicative of an increased concentration of lipids, which tend to be more depleted in 13C as compared to other biomolecules, in the soft tissue relative to the conchiolin. In this study, the stable carbon isotope of conchiolin represents only the insoluble fraction of the shell organic matter, as soluble components (e.g. carbohydrates, hydrophilic amino acids, and acid-soluble proteins) were excluded during the acidification process. As such, the offset between tissue and total conchiolin (i.e. soluble and insoluble fractions) of C. virginica may differ from the observed 2‰ offset found in this study and will be assessed further in future studies. Given our findings, however, oyster conchiolin may prove useful as a proxy for oyster soft tissue, providing insight into diet and environmental influences, in cases where soft tissues are not available for study.

Figure 3 (a) Stable carbon and (b) 14C isotope ratios of shell carbonate (white), conchiolin (gray), and soft tissue (black) of Crassostrea virginica specimens from Apalachicola Bay, USA.

Figure 4 δ13C versus Δ14C of shell carbonate (white), conchiolin (gray), and soft tissue (black) of Crassostrea virginica specimens from Apalachicola Bay, USA.

Table 1 Carbon isotope values of Crassostrea virginica tissues from Apalachicola Bay, USA.

Note: Statistically significant difference in means at p<.05 (*) and p<.001 (**).

Table 2 Alligator Harbor environmental samples.

In all three oyster tissue types, stable carbon isotopes are significantly more depleted in oysters from river-influenced sites compared to those from marine-influenced sites (Table 1). The depleted 13C signal closer to the Apalachicola River derives from the varied carbon sources in estuaries. River water DIC is isotopically lighter (more depleted in 13C) than marine DIC because it is derived from weathered carbonate minerals and mineralized organic matter that has undergone prolonged degradation, while DIC in seawater is near isotopic equilibrium with atmospheric CO2 (Mook and Tan Reference Mook and Tan1991). DIC isotopic composition within Apalachicola Bay co-varies with salinity, ranging from riverine-like values (–12‰ to –15‰) during high river flow to marine-like values (–0.6‰ to –0.8‰) during low-flow periods (Chanton and Lewis Reference Chanton and Lewis1999), with DIC being a major control on the isotopic composition of estuarine phytoplankton (Chanton and Lewis Reference Chanton and Lewis1999). Similarly, organic carbon in estuaries varies in stable carbon isotopic composition as a consequence of the various sources of organic carbon. The δ13C signal of rivers is usually relatively depleted, reflecting contributions from C3 terrestrial plant detritus, whereas marine organic carbon is primarily derived from phytoplankton and is relatively more enriched in 13C. The stable carbon isotope composition of the soft tissue and conchiolin reveal how differences in diet and available carbon are recorded in oyster tissues. The soft tissue of oysters collected from areas with a large riverine influence (27955, 17956, 27957, and 27958) are more depleted, with a carbon isotope composition of approximately –25‰, relative to the soft tissue of oysters collected from more distal sites, for which stable isotope composition ranged from –23 to –19‰. The stable carbon isotope composition of the conchiolin, likewise, is more depleted in oysters growing nearer to the river (–22.91±0.71‰) relative to the oysters growing in marine dominated sites (–19.69±1.44‰). While soft tissues from oysters have been used to infer the relative contribution of various carbon sources in estuarine diets (e.g. Chanton and Lewis Reference Chanton and Lewis2002), here we show the potential use of conchiolin as a proxy for interpreting diet and relative growing location in paleoecological studies.

Radiocarbon (Δ14C)

Interpreting carbon sources of 14C in oyster tissues is complicated because the 14C isotopic compositions of the various carbon reservoirs have been rapidly changing since the post-industrial period, with the surface ocean and atmospheric carbon reservoirs at near-equilibrium values in some locations (Druffel et al. Reference Druffel, Beaupré and Ziolkowski2016). Although environmental samples were not collected at each oyster sampling locality, the environmental samples presented in Table 2 indicate that modern terrestrial plants range from +7‰ to +28‰, indistinguishable from surface water DIC at Alligator Harbor, suggesting near-equilibrium conditions at this locale. Shell carbonate and oyster soft tissues from the marine-influenced sites strongly resemble these environmental samples in terms of Δ14C values, and there is little difference between shell carbonate and organic soft tissue within individuals (Figure 3).

While evidence suggests that the 14C signal at marine sites is being influenced by carbon reservoir equilibrium, at river dominated sites 14C in oysters seems to be more strongly influenced by riverine transport. The Apalachicola River passes through Miocene- and Oligocene-age limestones, carrying 14C-depleted DIC to the river-influenced regions of the bay (Hadden and Cherkinsky Reference Hadden and Cherkinsky2015, Reference Hadden and Cherkinsky2017). Ground water discharges from the Upper Floridan aquifer (UFA) and intermediate system to the Apalachicola River are another possible source of 14C-depleted DIC. The measured 14C activities are very low in waters from the UFA, with corresponding 14C ages of 8000 to >47,300 14C yr (Plummer and Sprinkle Reference Plummer and Sprinkle2001). These signals are preserved in oyster shell carbonates, with river-influenced oyster specimens being significantly depleted in 14C relative to marine-influenced specimens (Table 1). An avenue for future research will be to compare conchiolin and shell carbonate 14C in ancient specimens, when marine and atmospheric reservoirs were separated in Δ14C space.

Although carbonate transport may indirectly affect the Δ14C of conchiolin and oyster soft tissue, it is expected that diet would have a more direct influence on the isotopic signature of these fractions. Conchiolin is in every case depleted in 14C compared to soft tissues (Table 1), although the offset varies from as little as 0.7‰ to as much as 55.6‰. There is no statistical difference between river- and marine-influenced locales, in terms of the average Δ14C values or in terms of the magnitude of the conchiolin–soft tissue offset. A biplot of δ13C and Δ14C (Figure 4), however, suggests that dietary sources may be driving the variation in Δ14C observed in C. virginica. Four oysters, 29129, 29130, 27955, and 27956, exhibit more depleted Δ14C values, approaching the highly depleted value observed for POC in the 1–20 μm size range. This suggests that these organisms were incorporating a larger degree of POC-derived carbon into the conchiolin matrix. The consistently more depleted conchiolin Δ14C values, relative to soft tissue, suggests isotopic routing may be occurring, wherein POC-derived carbon, which is more depleted in 14C, is utilized for conchiolin development while carbon from younger organic matter is utilized for biosynthesis of soft tissues. Isotopic routing occurs when isotopes constituting dietary components are differentially routed to specific tissues and body compartments (Gannes et al. Reference Gannes, O’Brien, Martinez and del Rio1997).

An example of isotopic routing is found during the biosynthesis of proteins. Proteins are composed of a combination of essential and non-essential amino acids. While essential amino acids must be acquired from dietary amino acids, non-essential amino acids are resynthesized with atoms derived from all dietary fractions (i.e. lipids, carbohydrates). When dietary sources are protein-limited, organisms are found to incorporate a greater degree of carbon from carbohydrates and non-proteinaceous molecules into their synthesized proteins (Kennedy Reference Kennedy1988). However, when a protein-rich diet is available, the isotopic contribution of carbohydrates and lipids to protein resynthesis may be underrepresented (Ambrose and Norr Reference Ambrose and Norr1993). As a result, proteins synthesized predominately from protein-rich diets are going to differ isotopically from proteins synthesized predominately from dietary polysaccharides. This isotopic difference arises when biochemical constituent classes have different isotopic compositions (Degens Reference Degens1969). Isotopic routing may occur in C. virginica because of nutritional differences in dietary sources. These differences can be gleaned by comparing the C/N ratio of several possible dietary sources in the Apalachicola Bay system (Table 2). The C/N ratio of POC is 9.8, indicating a greater contribution of nitrogenous compounds. POC, then, may contain and therefore contribute a greater degree of proteinaceous biomolecules, facilitating the biosynthesis of a predominately proteinaceous conchiolin matrix. On the other hand, plant detritus, consisting of a relatively greater degree of polysaccharides and carbohydrates, may provide a greater proportion of the organic carbon utilized in biosynthesizing the more molecularly diverse soft tissues.

Aside from diet and isotopic routing, sorption of oil and humic materials may also play a role in the Δ14C variations observed between tissue and the acid-insoluble conchiolin matrix in C. virginica. There is potential for sorption and incorporation of sediments, dissolved organic matter, and particulate organic matter (Griffin and Druffel Reference Griffin and Druffel1989) during shell secretion and biomineralization. In this scenario, in lieu of dietary routing of organic carbon to the conchiolin matrix, organic carbon is directly adsorbed and bound within the shell matrix during shell accretion. A potential source of carbon to the particulate and dissolved organic carbon pools are hydrocarbons. These hydrocarbons may originate from natural oil seeps, which release oil into the Gulf of Mexico at a rate of 2.2–30 m3 1000 km–2 d–1 (Macdonald et al. Reference Macdonald, Guinasso, Ackleson, Amos, Duckworth, Sassen and Brooks1993). These hydrocarbons are depleted in 13C and 14C relative to other biomolecules and sorption onto the shell matrix would result in a more depleted signal in the shell relative to the tissue. It is likely that the isotopic compositions measured in the shell organic matrix represent a combination of dietary incorporation and adsorption of particulate organic matter into the shell organic matrix.

Genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic analyses show unique adaptations of oysters to sessile life in a highly stressful intertidal environment (Zhang et al Reference Zhang, Fang, Guo, Li, Luo, Xu, Yang, Zhang, Wang, Qi and Xiong2012). Air exposure, carbon limitation, and temperature and salinity stress may also induce physiologic and metabolic responses that manifest in isotopic fractionation in shell organic carbon. Whatever the cause, the large and variable depletion of 14C in modern oyster shell conchiolin with respect to other tissues suggests a potential problem with 14C dating more ancient samples.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study we set out to investigate potential uses of conchiolin in addressing paleoecological and archaeological questions. Conchiolin, an organic-rich matrix, should more readily reflect the Δ14C of dietary sources than the Δ14C signal of aquatic carbonate pools. As such, we hypothesized that conchiolin may help overcome the difficulties encountered when 14C dating shell. In this study we report near-equilibrium conditions between surface water DIC, terrestrial plants, and macrofauna at Alligator Harbor. We found that while conchiolin did seem to reflect the Δ14C signal of C. virginica diet, the disparate Δ14C values in food sources complicates the interpretation of 14C ages. However, based on the following findings, we propose using a combined multi-isotope approach for recreating diet and hydrologic dynamics using conchiolin, as follows:

  • Environmental δ13C signals are retained in all three oyster tissue types studied here, largely reflecting a marine versus riverine influence.

  • Shell carbonates and soft tissue record a marine- versus riverine- source of 14C.

  • Conchiolin is significantly depleted in 14C with respect to soft tissue as a result of significant influence of particulate organic matter resulting from either isotopic routing, adsorption of 14C-depleted material, or a combination of these processes.

  • The magnitude of the offset may reflect variations in metabolism, possibly related to stress responses.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

AMS dating was carried out with the support of Robert J. Speakman and CAIS. We are grateful to Hong Sheng for assistance in the laboratory, and to David Hadden, Alicin Hendricks, and Richard Hamm for field assistance. The manuscript was greatly improved by the thoughtful comments of and suggestions of Allen H. Andrews (NOAA Fisheries Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center) and two anonymous reviewers, as well as the organizers and participants of the 2nd International Radiocarbon and the Environment Conference.

References

REFERENCES

Ambrose, SH, Norr, L. 1993. Experimental evidence for the relationship of the carbon isotope ratios of whole diet and dietary protein to those of bone collagen and carbonate. In: Lambert JB, Grupe G, editors. Prehistoric Human Bone: Archaeology at the Molecular Level. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. p 137.Google Scholar
Andrus, CF, Crowe, DE. Geochemical analysis of Crassostrea virginica as a method to determine season of capture. Journal of Archaeological Science 27(1):3342.Google Scholar
Andrus, CFT, Thompson, VD. 2012. Determining the habitats of mollusk collection at the Sapelo Island shell ring complex, Georgia, USA using oxygen isotope sclerochronology. Journal of Archaeological Science 39(2):215228.Google Scholar
Baldwin, BS, Newell, RIE. 1995. Relative importance of different size food particles in the natural diet of oyster larvae (Crassostrea virginica) . Marine Ecology Progress Series 120:135145.Google Scholar
Carriker, MR, Palmer, RE, Prezant, RS. 1980. Functional ultramorphology of the dissoconch valves of oyster Crassostrea virginica . Proceedings of the National Shellfisheries Association 70:139182.Google Scholar
Chanton, JP, Lewis, FG. 1999. Plankton and dissolved inorganic carbon isotopic composition in a river-dominated estuary: Apalachicola Bay, Florida. Estuaries 22(3A):575583.Google Scholar
Chanton, JP, Lewis, FG. 2002. Examination of coupling between primary and secondary production in a river-dominated estuary: Apalachicola Bay, Florida, USA. Limnology and Oceanography 47(3):683697.Google Scholar
Chanton, JP, Cherrier, J, Wilson, RM, Sarkodee-Adoo, J, Bosman, S, Mickle, A, Graham, WM. 2012. Radiocarbon evidence that carbon from the Deepwater Horizon spill entered the planktonic food web of the Gulf of Mexico. Environmental Research Letters 7(3):045303.Google Scholar
Cherkinsky, A, Culp, RA, Dvoracek, DK, Noakes, JE. 2010. Status of the AMS facility at the University of Georgia. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physical Research B 268:867870.Google Scholar
Cherkinsky, A, Prasad, GR, Dvoracek, D. 2013. AMS measurement of samples smaller than 300μg at Center for Applied Isotope Studies, University of Georgia. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 294:8790.Google Scholar
Cherrier, J, Sarkodee-Adoo, J, Guilderson, TP, Chanton, JP. 2014. Fossil carbon in particulate organic matter in the Gulf of Mexico following the Deepwater Horizon event. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 1(1):108112.Google Scholar
DeNiro, MJ, Epstein, S. 1978. Influence of diet on the distribution of carbon isotopes in animals. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 42(5):495506.Google Scholar
Degens, ET. 1969. Biogeochemistry of stable carbon isotopes. In: Eglington G, Murphy MTJ, editors. Organic Geochemistry: Methods and Results. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. p 304329.Google Scholar
Druffel, ER. 1997. Geochemistry of corals: proxies of past ocean chemistry, ocean circulation, and climate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94(16):83548361.Google Scholar
Druffel, ERM, Beaupré, SR, Ziolkowski, LA. 2016. Radiocarbon in the oceans. In: Schuur EAG, Druffel ERM, Trumbore SE, editors. Radiocarbon and Climate Change: Mechanisms, Applications and Laboratory Techniques. Switzerland: Springer International. p 139166.Google Scholar
Elder, JF, Cairns, DJ. 1982. Production and decomposition of forest litter-fall on the Apalachicola River flood plain, Florida. U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2196-B.Google Scholar
Ellis, GS, Herbert, G, Hollander, D. 2014. Reconstructing carbon sources in a dynamic estuarine ecosystem using oyster amino acid δ13C values from shell and tissue. Journal of Shellfish Research 33(1):217225.Google Scholar
Farquhar, GD, Elheringer, JR, Kubrick, KT. 1989. Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Biology 40(1):503537.Google Scholar
Fukumori, K, Oi, M, Doi, H, Takahashi, D, Okuda, N, Miller, TW, Kuwae, M, Miyasaka, H, Genkai-Kato, M, Koizumi, Y, Omori, K. 2008. Bivalve tissue as a carbon and nitrogen isotope baseline indicator in coastal ecosystems. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 79(1):4550.Google Scholar
Furla, PA, Galgani, I, Durand, IS, Allemand, DE. 2000. Sources and mechanisms of inorganic carbon transport for coral calcification and photosynthesis. Journal of Experimental Biology 203(22):34453457.Google Scholar
Galstoff, PS. 1964. The American Oyster Crassostrea virginica Gmelin. Fishery Bulletin of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 64:480, p.Google Scholar
Gannes, LZ, O’Brien, DM, Martinez, , del Rio, C. 1997. Stable Isotopes in Animal Ecology: Assumptions, caveats, and a call for more laboratory experiments. Ecology 78(4):12711276.Google Scholar
Gillikin, DP, Ridder, FD, Ulens, H, Elskens, M, Keppens, E, Baeyens, W, Dehairs, F. 2005. Assessing the reproducibility and reliability of estuarine bivalve shells (Saxidomus giganteus) for sea surface temperature reconstruction: implications for paleoclimate studies. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 228(1):7085.Google Scholar
Gillikin, DP, Lorrain, A, Meng, L, Dehairs, F. 2007. A large metabolic carbon contribution to the δ13C record in marine aragonitic bivalve shells. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 71:29362946.Google Scholar
Griffin, S, Druffel, ER. 1989. Sources of carbon to deep-sea corals. Radiocarbon 31(3):533543.Google Scholar
Hadden, CS, Cherkinsky, A. 2015. 14C variations in pre-bomb nearshore habitats of the Florida Panhandle, USA. Radiocarbon 57(3):469477.Google Scholar
Hadden, CS, Cherkinsky, A. 2017. Carbon reservoir effects in eastern oyster from Apalachicola Bay, USA. Radiocarbon. DOI: 10.1017/RDC.2017.45.Google Scholar
Harding, JM, Spero, HJ, Mann, R, Herbert, GS, Sliko, JS. 2010. Reconstructing early 17th century estuarine drought conditions from Jamestown oysters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(23):1054910554.Google Scholar
Jones, DS. 1983. Sclerochronology: reading the record of the molluscan shell: annual growth increments in the shells of bivalve molluscs record marine climatic changes and reveal surprising longevity. American Scientist. 71(4):384391.Google Scholar
Kashiyama, YU, Ogawa, NO, Chikaraishi, YO, Kashiyama, NA, Sakai, SA, Tanabe, KA, Ohkouchi, NA. 2010. Reconstructing the life history of modern and fossil nautiloids based on the nitrogen isotopic composition of shell organic matter and amino acids. In: Tanabe K, Shigeta Y, Sasaki, Hirano H, editors. Cephalopods: Present and Past. Tokyo: Tokai University Press. p 6775.Google Scholar
Kennedy, BE. 1988. Variation in δ13C values of post medieval Europeans [PhD thesis]. University of Calgary.Google Scholar
Kirby, MX, Soniat, TM, Spero, HJ. 1998. Stable isotope sclerochronology of Pleistocene and recent oyster shells (Crassostrea virginica). Palaios 13(6):560569.Google Scholar
Lee, SW, Choi, CS. 2007. The correlation between organic matrices and biominerals (myostracal prism and folia) of the adult oyster shell. Crassostrea gigas. Micron 38(1):5864.Google Scholar
Livingston, RJ, Lewis, FG, Woodsum, GC, Niu, XF, Galperin, B, Huang, W, Christensen, JD, Monaco, ME, Battista, TA, Klein, CJ, Howell, RL. 2000. Modelling oyster population response to variation in freshwater input. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 50(5):655672.Google Scholar
Macdonald, IR, Guinasso, NL, Ackleson, SG, Amos, JF, Duckworth, R, Sassen, R, Brooks, JM. 1993. Natural oil slicks in the Gulf of Mexico visible from space. Journal of Geophysical Research 98(C9):1635116364.Google Scholar
McConnaughey, TA, Gillikin, DP. 2008. Carbon isotopes in mollusk shell carbonates. Geo-Marine Letters 28(5–6):287299.Google Scholar
Mook, WGA, Tan, FC. 1991. Stable carbon isotopes in rivers and estuaries. In: Degens ET, Kempe S, Richey JE, editors. Biogeochemistry of Major World Rivers. SCOPE Report 42. New York: SCOPE. p 245–64.Google Scholar
Newell, RI, Jordan, SJ. 1983. Preferential ingestion of organic material by the American oyster Crassostrea virginica . Marine Ecology Progress Series 28:4753.Google Scholar
Peterson, BJ, Fry, B. 1987. Stable isotopes in ecosystem studies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18(1):293320.Google Scholar
Plummer, NL, Sprinkle, CL. 2001. Radiocarbon dating of dissolved inorganic carbon in groundwater from confined parts of the Upper Floridan aquifer, Florida, USA. Hydrogeology Journal 9(2):127150.Google Scholar
Post, DM. 2002. Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 83(3):703718.Google Scholar
Rounick, JS, Winterbourn, MJ. 1986. Stable carbon isotopes and carbon flow in ecosystems. BioScience 36(3):171177.Google Scholar
Sastry, AN. 1963. Reproduction of the bay scallop, Aequipecten irradians Lamarck. Influence of temperature on maturation and spawning. The Biological Bulletin 125(1):146153.Google Scholar
Sikes, CS, Wheeler, AP, Wierzbicki, A, Dillaman, RM, De Luca, L. 1998. Oyster shell protein and atomic force microscopy of oyster shell folia. The Biological Bulletin 194(3):304316.Google Scholar
Stenzel, HB. 1963. Aragonite and calcite as constituents of adult oyster shells. Science 142(3589):232233.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355363.Google Scholar
Surge, DM, Lohmann, KC, Goodfriend, GS. 2003. Reconstructing estuarine conditions: oyster shells as recorders of environmental change, southwest Florida. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 57(5):737756.Google Scholar
Sykes, GA, Collins, MJ, Walton, DI. 1995. The significance of a geochemically isolated intracrystalline organic fraction within biominerals. Organic Geochemistry 23(11–12):10591065.Google Scholar
Tanaka, N, Monaghan, MC, Rye, DM. 1986. Contribution of metabolic carbon to mollusc and barnacle shell carbonate. Nature 320:520523.Google Scholar
Watanabe, S, Kodama, M, Fukuda, M. 2009. Nitrogen stable isotope ratio in the manila clam, Ruditapes philippinarum, reflects eutrophication levels in tidal flats. Marine Pollution Bulletin 58(10):14471453.Google Scholar
White, NM. 2014. Apalachicola Valley riverine, estuarine, bayshore, and saltwater shell middens. The Florida Anthropologist 67(2–3):77104.Google Scholar
Zhang, G, Fang, X, Guo, X, Li, L, Luo, R, Xu, F, Yang, P, Zhang, L, Wang, X, Qi, H, Xiong, Z. 2012. The oyster genome reveals stress adaptation and complexity of shell formation. Nature. 490(7418):4954.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1 Live-collected Crassostrea virginica shells from Apalachicola Bay, USA, with aragonitic shell components (R=resilium; Ms=muscle scar) noted. Sample target area indicated with dashed circle.

Figure 1

Figure 2 Map of the study area showing location of four sampling localities in Apalachicola Bay, USA.

Figure 2

Figure 3 (a) Stable carbon and (b) 14C isotope ratios of shell carbonate (white), conchiolin (gray), and soft tissue (black) of Crassostrea virginica specimens from Apalachicola Bay, USA.

Figure 3

Figure 4 δ13C versus Δ14C of shell carbonate (white), conchiolin (gray), and soft tissue (black) of Crassostrea virginica specimens from Apalachicola Bay, USA.

Figure 4

Table 1 Carbon isotope values of Crassostrea virginica tissues from Apalachicola Bay, USA.

Figure 5

Table 2 Alligator Harbor environmental samples.