Introduction
Lateral epitaxial overgrowth (LEO) is an attractive method to produce GaN films with a low density of extended defects, which is beneficial both to studies of the fundamental properties of the GaInAlN materials system and to GaN-based device technology. Recent studies have confirmed that the density of threading dislocations (TDs) is reduced by 3-4 orders of magnitude in the LEO material grown on 6H-SiCReference Zheleva, Nam, Bremser and Davis 1 , Al2O3 Reference Sakai, Sunakawa and Usui 2 ,Reference Marchand, Ibbetson, Fini, Kozodoy, Keller, Speck, DenBaars and Mishra 3 ,Reference Marchand, Wu, Ibbetson, Fini, Kozodoy, Keller, Speck, DenBaars and Mishra 4 , and Si(111)Reference Marchand, Zhang, Zhao, Golan, Fini, Ibbetson, Keller, DenBaars, Speck and Mishra 5 substrates, and the mechanisms of threading dislocations evolution with respect to the facet configuration of the LEO stripes have been investigated.Reference Zheleva, Nam, Bremser and Davis 1 , Reference Marchand, Wu, Ibbetson, Fini, Kozodoy, Keller, Speck, DenBaars and Mishra 4 , Reference Nam, Bremser, Zheleva and Davis 6 , Reference Sakai, Sunakawa and Usui 7 Optical studies of LEO GaNReference Freitas, Nam, Davis, Saparin and Obyden 8 , Reference Chichibu, Marchand, Keller, Fini, Ibbetson, Minsky, Fleischer, Speck, Bowers, Hu, Mishra, DenBaars, Deguchi, Sota and Nakamura 9 , Reference Li, Bishop and Coleman 10 and InGaN quantum wellsReference Chichibu, Marchand, Keller, Fini, Ibbetson, Minsky, Fleischer, Speck, Bowers, Hu, Mishra, DenBaars, Deguchi, Sota and Nakamura 9 have been reported. Finally, the use of LEO GaN has resulted in marked improvements in the lifetime of laser diodes,Reference Nakamura, Senoh, Nagahama, Isawa, Yamada, Matsushita, Kiyoku, Sugimoto, Kozaki, Umemoto, Sano and Chocho 11 while GaN p-n junctions,Reference Kozodoy, Ibbetson, Marchand, Fini, Keller, DenBaars, Speck and Mishra 12 InGaN singleReference Mukai, Takekawa and Nakamura 13 and multipleReference Sasaoka, Sumakawa, Kimura, Nido, Usui and Sakai 14 quantum well light emitting diodes, and GaN/AlGaN heterojunction field-effect transistorsReference Vetury, Marchand, Ibbetson, Fini, Keller, Speck, Denbaars and Mishra 15 fabricated on LEO GaN exhibit a ∼3 orders of magnitude reduction of the leakage current compared to identical devices based on bulk GaN.
LEO GaN is obtained by performing a regrowth on a conventional GaN layer (e.g. GaN/Al2O3) that is partially masked by an amorphous layer such as SiO2 or Si3N4. The process is anisotropic and can be characterized by two extreme crystalline orientations when using stripes as mask openings.Reference Kapolnek, Keller, Vetury, Underwood, Kozodoy, DenBaars and Mishra 16 Stripes aligned along the <11
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000288X:S109257830000288X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000288X:S109257830000288X_eqn01.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000288X:S109257830000288X_eqn01.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000288X:S109257830000288X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000288X:S109257830000288X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000288X:S109257830000288X_eqn01.gif?pub-status=live)
For device applications it is desirable to maximize the lateral growth rate while avoiding the formation of jagged sidewalls. In this paper we report on a two-step process that results in a reduction of the growth time necessary to achieve full coalescence of adjacent LEO stripes. The overgrowth is initiated in conditions that lead to smooth sidewalls, after which the growth parameters are changed to increase the lateral growth rate. We show that the stripe morphology is essentially determined by the growth conditions of the first overgrowth step, which greatly extends the range of conditions to achieve smooth LEO stripes.
Experiment
The LEO GaN was grown on 2 μm-thick GaN prepared by MOCVD on 2-inch diameter sapphire wafers using a conventional two-step process.Reference Keller, Keller, Kapolnek, Jiang, Wu, Masui, Wu, Heying, Speck, Mishra and DenBaars 21 Samples were coated with 200-nm-thick SiO2 using plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition, and 5 µm-wide openings oriented in the <10
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000288X:S109257830000288X_eqn01.gif?pub-status=live)
In this paper we discuss the properties of six samples whose growth parameters are listed in Table I. Uncoated samples were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using a JEOL 6300F field emission microscope operating at 15 kV. Specimens for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were prepared by wedge polishing followed by standard Ar+ ion milling. Images were recorded on a JEOL 2000FX microscope operated at 200 kV. The room-temperature photoluminescence was excited using a HeCd laser (325 nm, ∼20 mW/cmReference Sakai, Sunakawa and Usui 2 ) and detected using a 1/8 m grating monochromator and a photomultiplier tube.
Table I Precursor flow and step durations
Sample | Duration (s) | Step 1 TMGa (µmol/min) | NH3 (slm) | Duration (s) | Step 2 TMGa (µmol/min) | NH3 (slm) |
A | 900 | 100 | 3.6 | --- | --- | --- |
A2 | 3600 | 100 | 3.6 | --- | --- | --- |
B | 90 | 100 | 1.8 | 810 | 100 | 3.6 |
B2 | 900 | 100 | 1.8 | 900 | 100 | 3.6 |
C | 90 | 100 | 1.8 | 1710 | 50 | 1.8 |
D | 90 | 100 | 1.8 | 1710 | 50 | 3.6 |
Results
Figure 1(a,b) shows SEM micrographs of sample A, overgrown in a single 15-minute step using 3.6 slm of NH3, which results in jagged sidewalls (<10
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000288X:S109257830000288X_eqn01.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000288X:S109257830000288X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000288X:S109257830000288X_eqn01.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary-alt:20170731082921-54292-mediumThumb-S109257830000288X_fig1g.jpg?pub-status=live)
Figure 1 SEM micrographs of sample A (a: plan view, b: cross-section) and Sample B (c: plan view, d: cross-section) for a fill factor of 0.25. The edges of the mask are indicated by dark markers in (d).
Figure 2 illustrates the effect of TMGa and NH3 flow rates on the ratio r of lateral to vertical growth rate. In Refs 18 and 20 we have shown that an increase in fill factor (i.e. reduction of the mask spacing) has a similar effect as an increase in the input V/III ratio; thus the horizontal axis can be understood both as a geometrical factor and as an indirect V/III scale. The curve for sample A shows that r rolls off as the <10
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000288X:S109257830000288X_eqn01.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary-alt:20170731082921-54565-mediumThumb-S109257830000288X_fig2g.jpg?pub-status=live)
Figure 2 Ratio of lateral to vertical growth as a function of fill factor for samples A-D. The lateral growth is defined as the width of the GaN growth above the mask opening. The data points for a given curve are results from a single growth on a sample patterned with the various fill factors. The solid symbols indicate jagged sidewalls (<10
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000288X:S109257830000288X_eqn01.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary-alt:20170731082921-06777-mediumThumb-S109257830000288X_fig3g.jpg?pub-status=live)
Figure 3 Plan view TEM micrographs of (a) Sample A2 and (b) Sample B2 (bright field, g=2
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000288X:S109257830000288X_eqn01.gif?pub-status=live)
Figure 3 shows plan-view TEM micrographs of samples A2 and B2, which are similar to samples A and B except for the growth duration. For both samples the LEO region is free of threading dislocations. The LEO region of sample A2 (Fig. 3a) contains a large number of dislocations with line direction along the <10
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000288X:S109257830000288X_eqn01.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000288X:S109257830000288X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary-alt:20170731082921-15465-mediumThumb-S109257830000288X_fig4g.jpg?pub-status=live)
Figure 4 Room-temperature PL of samples A-D.
Figure 4 shows the room-temperature PL spectra of samples A-D around the band edge of GaN. In this experiment the light emission from both the LEO and the seed regions was collected. 22 Sample A shows a fairly broad peak (FWHM ∼120 meV) centered at 3.390 eV while samples B, C, and D have a narrower peak (FWHM ∼75 meV) centered at ∼3.405 eV. Although a detailed study of the optical properties is necessary to clarify the issue, the difference between the two sets of samples is most likely related to the residual strain in the LEO stripes, that is, samples B, C, and D are under slightly larger compressive stress than sample A.Reference Freitas, Nam, Davis, Saparin and Obyden 8 , Reference Chichibu, Marchand, Keller, Fini, Ibbetson, Minsky, Fleischer, Speck, Bowers, Hu, Mishra, DenBaars, Deguchi, Sota and Nakamura 9 , Reference Li, Bishop and Coleman 10 The possibility that the incorporation of impurities depend on the stripe morphology cannot be excluded and could also explain some of the differences between the two sets of samples.
Discussion
Figure 2 illustrates the effect of varying the TMG and NH3 flow rates over a wide range of conditions while exposing only the <11
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000288X:S109257830000288X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)
Our results indicate that the two-step process is suitable for increasing the lateral growth rate, which is a potential technological advantage. However, although samples B, C, and D exhibit a smooth morphology and a relatively low density of extended defects, their microstructure appears to be slightly inferior to that of typical samples grown with a slower lateral growth rate. Preliminary x-ray diffraction measurements indicate that the crystallographic tiltReference Marchand, Wu, Ibbetson, Fini, Kozodoy, Keller, Speck, DenBaars and Mishra 4 , Reference Sakai, Sunakawa and Usui 7 between the seed region and the LEO region scales with the ratio r.Reference Fini 23 This tilt correlates with the density of edge dislocations observed above the edge of the mask opening and, correspondingly, at the merging front of two adjacent stripes. Therefore, the residual density of dislocations in a fully-coalesced LEO film is likely to be higher for a larger lateral growth rate. It is not clear, however, that this will be a limiting factor for the fabrication of devices based on LEO GaN.
Finally, we note that it is possible to extend the two-step scheme to variations of other growth parameters, such as growth temperature, carrier gas, total pressure, and doping level. Our preliminary results indicate that, in all cases, process variations that would normally be unfavorable to the <11
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000288X:S109257830000288X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000288X:S109257830000288X_eqn01.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000288X:S109257830000288X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)
Conclusions
We have demonstrated a two-step process that results in a significant increase (up to a factor of 2.6) of the lateral growth rate while preserving smooth <11
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000288X:S109257830000288X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000288X:S109257830000288X_eqn01.gif?pub-status=live)
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170731073217724-0817:S109257830000288X:S109257830000288X_eqn02.gif?pub-status=live)
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by ONR (C. Wood) and AFOSR (G. Witt), and made use of the MRL Central Facilities supported by the NSF under award DMR-9123048. HM acknowledges financial support from the NSERC (Canada) and a Raychem Fellowship. PF ackowledges financial support from a NDSE Graduate Fellowship provided by ONR.