Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T06:11:01.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Benjamin D. Sommer, The Bodies of God and the World of Ancient Israel (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. xv+334. $88.00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2013

Stephen C. Russell*
Affiliation:
Princeton Theological Seminary, Princeton, NJ 08542, USAstephen.russell@ptsem.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 2013 

The Bodies of God beautifully outlines the debate which emerged in the Hebrew Bible between texts which assume a fluid notion of divine embodiment and selfhood and texts which emphasise instead divine unity of body and self. Sommer begins by showing how, in the ancient Mediterranean world, gods were imagined as possessing bodies, whether such bodies were material or merely had form without substance. There were, however, opposing conceptions of divine embodiment. He identifies a fluidity model, according to which gods could be present simultaneously in various kinds of bodies at multiple sites, both in heaven and on earth, and a non-fluidity model, according to which gods were only capable of having one body, either in heaven or in a particular location on earth. Within the fluidity model, deities were conceived as having fluid selves, so that a single deity might fragment into several local manifestations and multiple deities might overlap. The non-fluidity model emphasised instead unity of self.

Sommer demonstrates in several chapters that JE texts in the Pentateuch and some other biblical material – like texts from Mesopotamia and Canaan – utilise a fluid model, while Priestly and Deuteronomic literature – like classical Greek literature – operate instead within a non-fluid paradigm. The former portray an angel or divine messenger as a manifestation of Yhwh and conceive of Yhwh as potentially present in a wooden pole, desert shrub or stone stele. Priestly literature imagines Yhwh as present on earth but only in a single location, at the centre of his people and hidden within a protective cloud. Thus, Priestly texts follow a locomotive model of sacred space, in which there is a sacred centre which travels, sometimes to peripheral spaces. Deuteronomic literature portrays Yahweh as resident in heaven, with only his name attached to the central sanctuary in Jerusalem. In subtle ways, then, the Deuteronomic approach undermines the temple's sanctity while also affirming its uniqueness as a fixed sacred centre. A final chapter traces the legacy of biblical debates over divine fluidity in early Christianity and within various periods and strands of Judaism. An appendix summarises the case for normative Israelite monotheistic monolatry in the pre-exilic period.

Attention to three critical trajectories would refine the arguments Sommer advances here. First, the work of several scholars over the last fifty years has raised the possibility that the Priestly material in the Pentateuch was not composed to stand independently of JE but was from the beginning intended to incorporate earlier non-priestly material as part of a single composition. If so, one must reckon more fully with the ways in which P includes and transforms fluid notions of divinity. In this regard, Sommer's treatment of the several layers of the Ark Narrative is more compelling. Second, over the last fifteen years it has become clear that ancient Mediterranean family religion existed independently of monarchic religion and had its own emphases and forms. This distinction has implications both for thinking through the social context of the production of texts reflecting fluidity and for analysing the evidence for monotheism and monolatry in the pre-exilic period. Third, over the last twenty years, theoretical work on space by philosophers and geographers has had increasing impact on a variety of fields, including biblical studies. Attention to this spatial turn within the humanities would clarify the Priestly and Deuteronomic approaches to sacred space which, as Sommer recognises in two chapters on the topic, strain the theoretical framework for sacred space normally deployed in biblical studies.

The Bodies of God is a most welcome addition to debates over the development of ancient Israelite religion and of Judaism and Christianity. Its chief contribution is the identification of the distinction between fluid and non-fluid notions of divinity as a taxonomical polarity separate from the differences between monotheism and polytheism and between immanence and transcendence.