Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T11:28:51.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Horizontal transmission success of Nosema bombi to its adult bumble bee hosts: effects of dosage, spore source and host age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2007

S. T. RUTRECHT*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
J. KLEE
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK
M. J. F. BROWN
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
*
*Corresponding author: Department of Zoology, School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland. Tel: +353 (0) 896 1366. Fax: +353 (0) 677 8094. E-mail: srutrecht@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Parasite transmission dynamics are fundamental to explaining the evolutionary epidemiology of disease because transmission and virulence are tightly linked. Horizontal transmission of microsporidian parasites, e.g. Nosema bombi, may be influenced by numerous factors, including inoculation dose, host susceptibility and host population heterogeneity. Despite previous studies of N. bombi and its bumble bee hosts, neither the epidemiology nor impact of the parasite are as yet understood. Here we investigate the influence N. bombi spore dosage (1000 to 500 000 spores), spore source (Bombus terrestris and B. lucorum isolates) and host age (2- and 10-day-old bees) have on disease establishment and the presence of patent infections in adult bumble bees. Two-day-old bees were twice as susceptible as their 10-day-old sisters, and a 5-fold increase in dosage from 100 000 to 500 000 spores resulted in a 20-fold increase in the prevalence of patent infections. While intraspecific inoculations were 3 times more likely to result in non-patent infections there was no such effect on the development of patent infections. These results suggest that host-age and dose are likely to play a role in N. bombi's evolutionary epidemiology. The relatively low levels of horizontal transmission success are suggestive of low virulence in this system.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

INTRODUCTION

The epidemiology of host-parasite systems is often far from being understood. Partly, this can be attributed to a lack of understanding of transmission dynamics and their consequences. Specific mechanisms of parasite transmission may play a crucial role in explaining the evolutionary epidemiology of a disease. For example, in host-parasite systems with mixed transmission routes, the relative importance of horizontal versus vertical transmission can be a key determinant in the evolution and maintenance of virulence (Herre, Reference Herre1993; Ebert and Herre, Reference Ebert and Herre1996; Lipsitch et al. Reference Lipsitch, Siller and Nowak1996; Dunn and Smith, Reference Dunn and Smith2001). An understanding of these epidemiological dynamics is thus crucial both to test theory and to be able to manipulate and control disease.

It is generally expected that increased opportunities for horizontal transmission can lead to the evolution of higher pathogenicity, while increased levels of vertical transmission are predicted to favour reduced virulence (e.g. Bull et al. Reference Bull, Molineux and Rice1991; Bull, Reference Bull1994; Ebert, Reference Ebert and Stearns1999; Dunn et al. Reference Dunn, Terry and Smith2000). The efficiency and relative importance of horizontal transmission can be influenced by a variety of factors and their interactions. Among others, these factors include ecological traits such as inoculation dose (Bailey and Ball, Reference Bailey and Ball1991; Malone et al. Reference Malone, Gatehouse and Tregidga2001) and history of exposure (Nowak and May, Reference Nowak and May1994; May and Nowak, Reference May and Nowak1995; Frank, Reference Frank1996; Allander and Schmid-Hempel, Reference Allander and Schmid-Hempel2000), as well as host susceptibility (Gandon and Michalakis, Reference Gandon and Michalakis2000; Doums et al. Reference Doums, Moret, Benelli and Schmid-Hempel2002) and heterogeneity of the host population (Ebert, Reference Ebert1994, Reference Ebert1998; Morand et al. Reference Morand, Manning and Woolhouse1996; Regoes et al. Reference Regoes, Nowak and Bonhoeffer2000; Ganusov et al. Reference Ganusov, Bergstrom and Antia2002; Hatcher et al. Reference Hatcher, Hogg and Dunn2005).

Nosema bombi is a microsporidian parasite of bumble bees (Fantham and Porter, Reference Fantham and Porter1914; McIvor and Malone, Reference McIvor and Malone1995). Infections by N. bombi have been reported in a number of different bumble bee species (Fantham and Porter, Reference Fantham and Porter1914; MacFarlane et al. Reference MacFarlane, Lipa and Liu1995; Tay et al. Reference Tay, O'Mahony and Paxton2005; Larsson, Reference Larsson2007) and occur at prevalences of up to 50% and 55% among males and workers respectively (Shykoff and Schmid-Hempel, Reference Shykoff and Schmid-Hempel1991). Transmission stages of the parasite are released in the faeces of adult bees, and then presumably consumed by new hosts. Despite numerous studies, however, neither the epidemiology of the parasite nor its impact on its host are as yet understood. Horizontal transmission of N. bombi has been claimed to be restricted to the larval stage of the host by some authors (Eijnde and Vette, Reference Eijnde and Vette1993), or to occur in both larvae and adults (McIvor and Malone, Reference McIvor and Malone1995; Schmid-Hempel and Loosli, Reference Schmid-Hempel and Loosli1998). Nosema apis, the equivalent microsporidian in honey bees, is only able to infect adult workers (Bailey, Reference Bailey1955, Reference Bailey1981; Hassanein, Reference Hassainen1951). Field studies suggest that horizontal transmission occurs between bumble bee colonies, presumably via either flowers (when infected worker bees leave spores behind after collecting nectar or pollen) or worker drifting (Imhoof and Schmid-Hempel, Reference Imhoof and Schmid-Hempel1999), and recent genetic data suggest that such colony-to-colony horizontal transmission has resulted in a lack of parasite population structure across its multiple bumble bee host species (Tay et al. Reference Tay, O'Mahony and Paxton2005), and presumably the evolution of a generalist parasite. In addition to horizontal transmission, N. bombi must be transmitted vertically from one generation to the next by hibernating queens, as bumble bees have an annual life-cycle (Schmid-Hempel, Reference Schmid-Hempel2001).

While the transmission routes of N. bombi remain unclear, the impact it has on its host (its virulence) is even more opaque. Previous studies have suggested that N. bombi is associated with increased sexual productivity (Imhoof and Schmid-Hempel, Reference Imhoof and Schmid-Hempel1999) or no impact at all (Betts, Reference Betts1920; Fisher and Pomeroy, Reference Fisher and Pomeroy1989; Shykoff and Schmid-Hempel, Reference Shykoff and Schmid-Hempel1991; McIvor and Malone, Reference McIvor and Malone1995; Whittington and Winston, Reference Whittington and Winston2003). In stark contrast, other studies have found that the parasite reduces host life-span (Fantham and Porter, Reference Fantham and Porter1914; Schmid-Hempel and Loosli, Reference Schmid-Hempel and Loosli1998), reduces sexual productivity (Eijnde and Vette, Reference Eijnde and Vette1993), and paralyses queen abdomens, preventing copulation (De Jonghe, Reference De Jonghe1986; MacFarlane et al. Reference MacFarlane, Lipa and Liu1995). It has even been suggested that N. bombi may have caused a major population crash in commercially reared bumble bees, as well as premature colony death in commercial greenhouses in North America (Whittington and Winston, Reference Whittington and Winston2003).

Previous studies of horizontal transmission in this system have been conducted using single doses and sources of N. bombi spores, and single age cohorts or non-age-controlled groups of host animals. However, studies in other microsporidia suggest that dosage and host age are important in determining the success of transmission. Increasing dose leads to increasing prevalence or effect of infection in microsporidia that infect larval stages of their host (Inglis et al. Reference Inglis, Lawrence and Davis2003; Down et al. Reference Down, Bell, Kirkbride-Smith and Edwards2004), and in N. apis which infects adult honey bees (Fries, Reference Fries1988; Malone et al. Reference Malone, Gatehouse and Tregidga2001), but not in a parasite of non-larval Daphnia (Vizoso and Ebert, Reference Vizoso and Ebert2005). Larvae become less susceptible to microsporidian parasites as they age (Novotny, Reference Novotny1991; Inglis et al. Reference Inglis, Lawrence and Davis2003; Down et al. Reference Down, Bell, Kirkbride-Smith and Edwards2004), and N. bombi has been suggested to be more infective to larval than adult bumble bees (Eijnde and Vette, Reference Eijnde and Vette1993; but see Schmid-Hempel and Loosli, Reference Schmid-Hempel and Loosli1998).

Cross-species transmission is another potentially important aspect of horizontal transmission in this system. While recent genetic studies suggest a lack of specific interactions between N. bombi and its various bumble bee hosts (Tay et al. Reference Tay, O'Mahony and Paxton2005), previous studies have suggested species-specificity exists in relation to cross-infection (De Jonghe, Reference De Jonghe1986; Schmid-Hempel and Loosli, Reference Schmid-Hempel and Loosli1998). Both studies noted differences in susceptibility among host species, however, De Jonghe (Reference De Jonghe1986) noted higher susceptibility in the foreign host species while the reverse tendency was reported by Schmid-Hempel and Loosli (Reference Schmid-Hempel and Loosli1998).

Finally, previous work has not distinguished between patent and non-patent infections, with most assessments of susceptibility and infection success being based on the presence of N. bombi spores in sectioned host tissue or host abdominal homogenate (e.g. McIvor and Malone, Reference McIvor and Malone1995). To understand the impact of factors such as spore dose, source and host age, on horizontal transmission, a clear distinction must be made between the establishment of an infection in a host bee, and the development of that infection into a patent, transmissible stage.

Here we investigate the influence of N. bombi spore dosage, spore source, and host age on the efficacy of horizontal transmission among adult bumble bees and the presence of patent infections. All of these factors are likely to influence horizontal transmission success. Because parasite transmission and virulence are tightly linked, an understanding of transmission should shed light on the evolutionary epidemiology of this system.

Materials and Methods

Experimental animals and maintenance

Worker bees from 5 commercially raised colonies of Bombus terrestris (purchased from Koppert Ltd, through Hortico Ireland Ltd) served as experimental hosts in the first experiment. Commercially reared colonies come from stock that is out-bred (Ruiz-González and Brown, Reference Ruiz-González and Brown2006) and to which new field-caught lines are regularly added (Velthuis and van Doorn, Reference Velthuis and van Doorn2006). Thus, there is no a priori reason to believe that their resistance to parasitism should be different from wild bees. Furthermore, previous work with other parasites (e.g. Logan et al. Reference Logan, Ruiz-González and Brown2005) has found no differences in the success of these parasites in commercial colonies. Because infection success in the first experiment was extremely low, 2 additional colonies were purchased from the same supplier and used as the worker source for a second follow-up experiment with increased dosages.

Prior to experiments all colonies were checked to ensure that they carried no natural parasite infections (for each colony 5 randomly selected bees were dissected and thoroughly examined for parasites – no bee was found to be infected by either Nosema bombi or any of the other known parasites of B. terrestris; Schmid-Hempel, Reference Schmid-Hempel2001) and were transferred to observation hives for ease of handling (adapted from Pomeroy and Plowright, Reference Pomeroy and Plowright1980). This also ensured that experimental bees never fed on treated sugar water (commercially-reared colonies are supplied with sugar water that may contain anti-fungal additives). Colonies were kept under standard rearing conditions (26°C; 60% R.H.). Colonies were left for approximately 3 weeks before callow workers were sourced from the colonies in order to ensure that only workers that had not come in contact with treated sugar water were used in the experiments. Callow bees were removed daily, and for each colony sequentially allocated to experimental groups. Experimental animals were kept individually in small plastic boxes (12×10×7 cm) supplied with pollen and sugar water ad libitum and at room temperature (min=17·8°C max=21·2°C; average 18·8°C; measurements taken with a Barigo max/min digital thermometer) under natural light conditions.

Inoculum preparation and administration

Two types of inoculum were used. Each type consisted of N. bombi spores that were isolated from either B. terrestris or B. lucorum queens that had been caught in the wild around Dublin, Ireland, and which had heavily infected fat-bodies and Malpighian tubules. To obtain spore isolates the whole abdomen of an infected bee was homogenized in 0·5 ml of 0·01 m NH4Cl (ammonium chloride inhibits the premature germination of spores; Undeen and Avery, Reference Undeen and Avery1988) using a glass mortar and pestle. The resulting spore solution was then washed through gauze with 0·01 m NH4Cl to separate out the remaining exoskeleton and hairs and distributed in 5 ml volumes to a series of 15 ml tubes which were subsequently centrifuged at 1000 g for 10 min. The lowermost white part of the resulting pellet was then resuspended in 0·01 m NH4Cl and centrifuged again. This process was repeated until the remaining pellet appeared pure white. The purified pellet was then resuspended in 0·01 m NH4Cl, counted in a haemocytometer (Neubauer chamber), and diluted to the desired spore concentration. The terrestris inoculum consisted of a mixture of 3 different spore isolates that originated from 3 B. terrestris queens caught in the spring of 2005. The lucorum inoculum contained a mixture of spore isolates from 3 B. lucorum spring queens caught in the spring of 2004. Inocula were prepared from a mixture of isolates in order to standardize inoculations and to test for species-level, rather than strain-level effects of spore origin. Inocula were stored in the freezer at −80°C until use in the experiments. All bees were starved for 4 h before receiving their respective treatments. The inocula were administered in the form of 10 μl droplets, containing the respective amount of spores suspended in diluted sugar water, dispensed onto the floor of small plastic vials in which starved bees were confined; in every case spore suspensions were quickly consumed by the starved bee.

Experiment 1

This experiment tested the effects of dosage, spore source, and single versus multiple inoculations. In the first part, workers of 2 different age groups, 2 and 10 days old, were inoculated with 1 of 3 different dosages: low=1000, medium=10 000 and high=100 000 spores per 10 μl of the terrestris inoculum. Dosage levels used in this study were based on results from previous investigations which indicate that dosages of ⩾60 000 spores are capable of causing infection (Schmid-Hempel and Loosli, Reference Schmid-Hempel and Loosli1998; McIvor and Malone, Reference McIvor and Malone1995; Rutrecht and Brown, unpublished data). To date, no study has investigated a possible threshold dosage for disease establishment. Consequently, in this experiment dosages lower than those previously examined were used to test for such a threshold. Ten individuals from each colony (N=5 colonies) were allocated to each age/dosage category (total N=300 bees). Secondly, to investigate possible cross-species effects, a further set of 10 workers per colony was inoculated with a single high dosage (100 000 spores per 10 μl) of the lucorum inoculum at 2 days of age (N=50 bees). Since environmental transmission of N. bombi is thought to occur via spores deposited on flowers (Durrer and Schmid-Hempel, Reference Durrer and Schmid-Hempel1994; Imhoof and Schmid-Hempel, Reference Imhoof and Schmid-Hempel1999), a foraging individual is likely to encounter spores repeatedly. Thus, a trickle dose may be more comparable to natural exposure. Consequently, in the third part of this experiment, an additional set of 10 workers per colony was inoculated at 2 days of age with a trickle dose of terrestris spores, consisting of a single low dosage (1000 spores per 10 μl) administered on 5 consecutive days (5000 spores in total).

Experiment 2

On the basis of results from Exp. 1, all workers used in the second experiment were 2 days old at infection. Ten workers each per colony (N=2 colonies) were inoculated with a single dose of 500 000 lucorum spores per 10 μl of inoculum. Two additional sets of 10 workers per colony were inoculated with a trickle dose of lucorum or terrestris spores consisting of a single dosage (100 000 spores per 10 μl) administered on 5 consecutive days (500 000 spores in total).

Assessment of infection success

McIvor and Malone (Reference McIvor and Malone1995) suggested that mature spores are produced within 5 days of infection (although they did not check for the presence of these spores in faeces, which would be indicative of patent infections), whereas Schmid-Hempel and Loosli (Reference Schmid-Hempel and Loosli1998) observed that it took 21 days for infections to become patent (although in their later assessments of infection success and intensity, animals were not explicitly checked for the presence of patent infections). Consequently, in this study infection success was evaluated as the presence of patent infections at 2 time-points post-inoculation (p.i.). At 10 days p.i. faecal samples were taken from each inoculated animal and thoroughly examined for N. bombi spores under a phase-contrast microscope at 400×magnification. At 21 days p.i. (in the case of trickle infections post-inoculation refers to the last administered inoculate i.e. 26 days after the first inoculation) animals were dissected and the entire contents of the hindgut (i.e. faeces) and subsamples of the fat-body and Malpighian tubules were thoroughly examined, again under a phase-contrast microscope at 400×magnification.

Due to extremely low levels of patent infections in Exp. 1, a subsample of individuals was assessed using a sensitive molecular N. bombi detection method, which detects spores as well as non-spore developmental stages of the parasite in bumble bee tissue (Klee et al. Reference Klee, Tay and Paxton2006). Molecular analyses were conducted following the protocol developed by Klee et al. (Reference Klee, Tay and Paxton2006) that indicates the presence of N. bombi by amplifying a 118 or 122 bp section of the ITS, the 3′ end of the SSU rRNA and the 5′ end of the LSU rRNA.

For bees that were visibly infected at dissections (in all of these cases spores were present in the faecal contents, indicating patent infections) infection intensities were assessed by spore counts of homogenized abdomens. Abdomens were homogenized in 0·5 ml of detergent (20 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7·5, 150 mm NaCl 1 mm EDTA, 1 mm EGTA, 1% NP-40) with a glass mortar and pestle. Each abdomen was ground with the pestle 20 times in order to standardize the procedure. Detergent instead of water was used to facilitate the release of spores from the infected tissues, and, thus, to obtain a more homogenous suspension. For the quantification of infection intensities the resulting spore suspension was diluted by half and counted in a haemocytometer (Neubauer chamber) under the microscope at 400×magnification.

Statistical analyses

Differences in the proportion of individuals infected by N. bombi among the various treatment groups (dosage, age, single/trickle dose) were assessed using Fisher's exact tests. Data for spore intensities were analysed using a 2-way ANOVA and one-sample t-tests. All analyses were conducted on SPSS 12 for the PC and SPSS 13 for the Mac. Results were considered significant at P<0·05, and two-tailed tests of significance were used throughout.

RESULTS

Experiment 1

Out of a total of 392 individual B. terrestris workers (8 bees from various treatment groups escaped and were lost from the experiment), only a single bee, which was treated at age 2 with a single high dosage (100 000 spores) of lucorum spores, was found to be visually infected at dissection. No spores were found in the 392 faecal samples taken at day 10 p.i. Thus, the proportion of patent infections across the entire experiment was extremely low (0·25%). The single infected worker carried ∼3·7 million spores.

In order to determine whether non-patent infections had been established, a subset of 3 treatment groups (high dosage terrestris spores for age groups 2 and 10, and high dosage lucorum spores at age 2) from the colony from which the single worker with a patent infection originated (colony 1) plus a second, randomly chosen, colony (colony 2) were scanned molecularly. In contrast to visual inspection, molecular analyses revealed significant effects for both the age of animals when the inocula were administered as well as for the source of spores (Table 1).

Table 1. Numbers of infected and non-infected individuals as determined by molecular analyses of homogenized abdomens 21 days after inoculation with Nosema bombi

* Two individuals in colony 2 were lost from the experiment.

Within the treatment group that received terrestris spores the likelihood of becoming infected was significantly higher for animals at 2 days of age (77·78%) as compared to individuals at 10 days of age (30·00%) (Fisher's exact P=0·004; differences between colonies within age groups were non-significant: Fisher's exact – 2 days: P=1·000; 10 days, P=0·141). Intraspecific inoculations were significantly more successful than interspecific inoculations at causing infections in 2-day-old bees (terrestris spores=77·78% infection success vs lucorum spores=25·00%; Fisher's exact P=0·003; there was no difference between colonies for the lucorum spore source: Fisher's exact P=1·000).

Experiment 2

Twelve out of 57 individuals exhibited patent infections (3 individuals died prematurely and were excluded from the analyses; no signs of infection were noted in these animals at dissections; Table 2). As in Exp. 1, no spores were detected in faecal samples at 10 days p.i.

Table 2. Numbers of infected and non-infected individuals as determined by dissections and visual detection of spores 21 days after inoculation with Nosema bombi

* One animal in colony A and 2 animals in colony B died prematurely, and were excluded.

Although administration of a single dosage of lucorum spores led more frequently to an infection (40·00%) than a trickle dosage (15·79%), the difference was not significant (Fisher's exact P=0·155; differences between colonies were non-significant both within trickle- and single-treatment: Fisher's exact – trickle dose: P=0·582; single dose: P=1·000). Similarly, there was no significant difference between single- and trickle-infected animals in infection intensity (2-ANOVA: Dose-type, F 12,1=0·339, P=0·577; Colony, F 12,1=0·419, P=0·535; Dose-type×Colony, F 12,1=2·260, P=0·171), although infections appeared less intense in bees that had received a single inoculum (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Differences in Nosema bombi spore counts (based on 1 ml dilution of homogenate) between animals infected by single and trickle lucorum spore dosage. Data points are boxplots, showing the median value with the box marking the interquartile range; numbers above bars indicate the sample size in each colony; the circle above the bar indicates an outlier.

In contrast to the molecularly identified non-patent infections in Exp. 1, spore origin did not influence the percentage of patent infections resulting from the trickle dose (terrestris=5·56%, lucorum=15·79%; Fisher's exact: P=0·604; no significant differences between colonies P=0·444). The single individual that was found to be infected in the terrestris trickle dose treatment had an infection intensity of ∼2·9 million spores which was not significantly different from the intensities recorded in animals treated with a trickle dose of lucorum spores (one-sample t-test, t 2=2·619, P=0·12).

Overall (spanning both experiments), there was a clear effect of dose on the likelihood of developing a patent infection. Among bees that were treated with a single dosage of lucorum spores, a 5-fold higher dosage (500 000 spores compared to 100 000 spores) increased the average infection success from 2% (1/50 bees – Exp. 1) to 40% (8/20 bees – Exp. 2) (Fisher's exact: P⩽0·001). Nevertheless, the infection intensity in the single bee inoculated by the low dose was not significantly different from the intensity of infection in bees inoculated with a 5-fold higher dose (one-sample t-test, t 7=0·862, P=0·417).

DISCUSSION

Dose, host-age and donor identity all significantly influence the likelihood of horizontal transmission of Nosema bombi to adult bumble bee workers. However, our results also suggest that only host-age and dose are likely to play a role in the evolutionary epidemiology of this microsporidian parasite.

Infection success can be measured in two ways. One, has the parasite established itself in its host? And two, is the parasite capable of transmitting from its newly infected host? Previous studies of N. bombi in bumble bees have not distinguished between these measures of success (Eijnde and Vette, Reference Eijnde and Vette1993; McIvor and Malone, Reference McIvor and Malone1995; Schmid-Hempel and Loosli, Reference Schmid-Hempel and Loosli1998). In our experiments, a 5-fold increase in dosage from 100 000 to 500 000 spores resulted in a 20-fold increase in the prevalence of patent infections. Similar observations have been made for N. apis infections in the honey bee (Fries, Reference Fries1988; Malone et al. Reference Malone, Gatehouse and Tregidga2001). Coupled with the absence of patent infections below a dose of 100 000 spores, these results suggest that a minimum dosage in the range of 100 000 spores has to be encountered by an animal to make possible the establishment of a transmittable infection. The intensity of infection in adult-infected bees, at around 4000 spores/μl of abdominal homogenate (regardless of dosage), was of the same magnitude as the majority of infections in a previous study (Schmid-Hempel and Loosli, Reference Schmid-Hempel and Loosli1998) but 1 or 2 orders of magnitude lower than in larval-infected bees (Rutrecht and Brown, unpublished data). This suggests that, whilst adult bees can indeed pick up N. bombi and develop patent infections, such infections are likely to play a minor role in the epidemiology of the parasite. This is because bees infected as adults should contribute less to the spread of infective spores due to their lower spore dose, combined with the existence of a threshold dosage for further infections.

In contrast to these results, molecular analyses revealed the presence of non-patent infections in 25% of animals inoculated with 100 000 spores. The molecularly recorded prevalences in this study are similar to results from a previous study by Schmid-Hempel and Loosli (Reference Schmid-Hempel and Loosli1998) who used a similar dosage to induce infections (60 000 spores) and scored infection success via microscopical examination of abdominal homogenate, rather than analysis of faecal samples. In contrast to Schmid-Hempel and Loosli (Reference Schmid-Hempel and Loosli1998) we found no effects of colony on the likelihood of a bee developing a non-patent infection. However, there was a significant effect of host age, with 2-day-old bees being twice as susceptible as their 10-day-old sisters. In addition, the only patent infection after the 100 000 spore inoculum was found in a 2-day-old bee. This decrease in susceptibility with increasing age is unlikely to be due to changes in host immunity, as immunocompetence decreases over the same time period (Doums et al. Reference Doums, Moret, Benelli and Schmid-Hempel2002), but may be due to changes in gut structure as the bee ages.

Obviously, any effects of host-age on infection need to be examined in the context of the host's life-history. In the field, the average life-expectancy of a bumble bee worker is about 20–30 days (Rodd et al. Reference Rodd, Plowright and Owen1980; Goldblatt and Fell, Reference Goldblatt and Fell1987; Schmid-Hempel and Heeb, Reference Schmid-Hempel and Heeb1991). If it takes 21 days for an infection to become transmittable (Schmid-Hempel and Loosli, Reference Schmid-Hempel and Loosli1998) then there is unlikely to be selection on the parasite to successfully infect older bees. In contrast, bees infected in the first few days after eclosion have a much higher probability of surviving to transmit spores. Thus this age effect, combined with previous studies (Eijnde and Vette, Reference Eijnde and Vette1993), suggests that N. bombi has evolved to infect larvae and young adults preferentially because such infections are significantly more likely to lead to further spread of the parasite.

Intraspecific inoculations were three-times more likely to result in non-patent infections. This is surprising, given that recent genetic analyses have demonstrated that N. bombi has no host-species related population structure, which should be indicative of the absence of species-specific interactions (Tay et al. Reference Tay, O'Mahony and Paxton2005). Schmid-Hempel and Loosli (Reference Schmid-Hempel and Loosli1998) conducted the obverse of our experiment, inoculating 3 different host species (hypnorum, lapidarius and terrestris) with 1 inoculum. A re-analysis (binary logistic regression with colony and species entered as predictor variables) of their data found no significant effects of host species on parasite establishment (the final model contained colony, but not species, as a predictor variable for establishment: 84·4% cases categorised correctly, Colony: Wald-statistic=26·03). Furthermore, in contrast to our non-patent infections, there was no effect of intra-versus interspecific inoculations on the likelihood of developing patent infections in Exp. 2. If anything, the trend was in the opposite direction. Thus, while our experiments have revealed intriguing evidence for species-specific interactions in this single-parasite/multiple-host species system, our data on patent infections are in line with molecular work that suggests N. bombi is a generalist parasite of multiple bumble bee host species (Tay et al. Reference Tay, O'Mahony and Paxton2005).

In conclusion, our results, in combination with previous studies (Eijnde and Vette, Reference Eijnde and Vette1993; Schmid-Hempel and Loosli, Reference Schmid-Hempel and Loosli1998), demonstrate that the epidemiology of N. bombi depends upon successfully infecting young adults and larval bees. The mechanisms that underlie such age-dependent infection success remain unexplored in microsporidia in general. Newly eclosed bees remain within the nest for the first few days of their adult life, and combined with the positive relationship between dose and infection success this suggests that the colony, where spores accumulate and are protected from destructive UV, is likely to be the major arena for worker infection. Thus the relatively low level of horizontal transmission indicated by our results, either among or within colonies, may suggest low levels of virulence in this microsporidian parasite. Further studies of the epidemiology of N. bombi should concentrate on within-colony epidemiology and the route and frequency of cross-colony transmission.

We would like to thank Peter Stafford for technical help, Dr Robert Paxton for allowing us to use his molecular lab, and the editor and referees for helpful comments. This work was made possible by an IRCSET post-graduate scholarship award to S. T. R. and the EU project Pollinator Parasites (QLK5-CT-2002-00741) that supported J. K.

References

REFERENCES

Allander, K. and Schmid-Hempel, P. (2000). Immune defence reaction in bumble-bee workers after a previous challenge and parasitic coinfection. Functional Ecology 14, 711717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, L. (1955). The infection of the ventriculus of the adult honey bee by Nosema apis (Zander). Parasitology 45, 8994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailey, L. (1981). Honey Bee Pathology. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Bailey, L. and Ball, B. V. (1991). Honey Bee Pathology, 2nd Edn. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
Betts, A. D. (1920). Nosema in humble bees. Bee World 1, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, J. J. (1994). Virulence. Evolution 48, 14231437.Google ScholarPubMed
Bull, J. J., Molineux, I. J. and Rice, W. R. (1991). Selection of benevolence in a host parasite system. Evolution 45, 875882.Google Scholar
De Jonghe, R. (1986). Crossing experiments with Bombus terrestris terrestris (Linnaeus, 1758) and Bombus terrestris xanthopus (Kriechbaumer, 1870) and some notes on diapause and nosemose (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Phegea 14, 1923.Google Scholar
Doums, C., Moret, Y., Benelli, E. and Schmid-Hempel, P. (2002). Senescence of immune defence in Bombus workers. Ecological Entomology 27, 138144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Down, R. E., Bell, H. A., Kirkbride-Smith, A. E. and Edwards, J. P. (2004). The pathogenicity of Vairimorpha necatrix (Microspora: Microsporidia) against the tomato moth, Lacanobia oleracea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and its potential use for the control of lepidopteran glasshouse pests. Pest Management Science 60, 755764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, A. M. and Smith, J. E. (2001). Microsporidian life cycles and diversity: the relationship between virulence and transmission. Microbes and Infection 3, 381388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, A. M., Terry, R. S. and Smith, J. E. (2000). Transovarial transmission in the microsporidia. Advances in Parasitology 48, 56100.Google Scholar
Durrer, S. and Schmid-Hempel, P. (1994). Shared use of flowers leads to horizontal pathogen transmission. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 258, 299302.Google Scholar
Ebert, D. (1994). Virulence and local adaptation of a horizontally transmitted parasite. Science 265, 10841086.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebert, D. (1998). Experimental evolution of parasites. Science 282, 14321435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebert, D. (1999). The evolution and expression of parasite virulence. In Evolution in Health and Disease (ed. Stearns, S. C.), pp. 161172. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Ebert, D. and Herre, E. A. (1996). The evolution of parasitic diseases. Parasitology Today 12, 96101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eijnde, J. V. D. and Vette, N. (1993). Nosema infection in honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) and bumble bees (Bombus terrestris L.). Proceedings of Experimental and Applied Entomology, N. E. V. Amsterdam 4, 205208.Google Scholar
Fantham, H. B. and Porter, A. (1914). The morphology, biology and economic importance of Nosema bombi n. sp. parasitic in various humble bees (Bombus sp.). Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 8, 623638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. M. and Pomeroy, N. (1989). Incipient colony manipulation, Nosema incidence and colony productivity of the bumble bee Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 62, 581589.Google Scholar
Frank, S. A. (1996). Models of parasite virulence. The Quarterly Review of Biology 71, 3771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fries, I. (1988). Infectivity and multiplication of Nosema apis Z. in the ventriculus of the honeybee. Apidologie 19, 319328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandon, S. and Michalakis, Y. (2000). Evolution of parasite virulence against qualitative or quantitative host resistance. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 267, 985990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ganusov, V. V., Bergstrom, C. T. and Antia, R. (2002). Within-host population dynamics and the evolution of microparasites in a heterogenous host population. Evolution 56, 213223.Google Scholar
Goldblatt, J. W. and Fell, R. D. (1987). Adult longevity of workers of the bumblebees B. fervidus, B. pennsylvanicus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 65, 23492353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassainen, M. H. (1951). The influence of Nosema apis on the larval honey-bee. Annals of Applied Biology 38, 844846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatcher, M. J., Hogg, J. C. and Dunn, A. M. (2005). Local adaptation and enhanced virulence of Nosema granulosis artificially introduced into novel populations of its crustacean host, Gammarus duebeni. International Journal for Parasitology 35, 265274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herre, E. A. (1993). Population structure and the evolution of virulence in nematode parasites of fig wasps. Science 259, 14421445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imhoof, B. and Schmid-Hempel, P. (1999). Colony success of the bumble bee, Bombus terrestris, in relation to infection by two protozoan parasites, Crithidia bombi and Nosema bombi. Insectes Sociaux 46, 233238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglis, G. D., Lawrence, A. M. and Davis, F. M. (2003). Impact of a novel species of Nosema on the southwestern corn borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 96, 1220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klee, J., Tay, W. T. and Paxton, R. J. (2006). Sensitive and specific detection of Nosema bombi (Microsporidia: Nosematidae) in bumble bees (Bombus spp.; Hymenoptera: Apidae) by PCR of partial rRNA gene sequences. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 91, 98104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsson, J. I. R. (2007). Cytological variation and pathogenicity of the bumble bee parasite Nosema bombi (Microspora, Nosematidae). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 94, 111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lipsitch, M., Siller, S. and Nowak, M. A. (1996). The evolution of virulence in pathogens with vertical and horizontal transmission. Evolution 50, 17291741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Logan, A., Ruiz-González, M. X. and Brown, M. J. F. (2005). The impact of host starvation on parasite development and population dynamics in an intestinal trypanosome parasite of bumble bees. Parasitology 130, 637642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacFarlane, R. P., Lipa, J. J. and Liu, H. (1995). Bumble bee pathogens and internal enemies. Bee World 76, 130148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, L. A., Gatehouse, H. S. and Tregidga, E. L. (2001). Effects of time, temperature, and honey on Nosema apis (Microsporidia: Nosematidae), a parasite of the honeybee, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 77, 258268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
May, R. M. and Nowak, M. A. (1995). Coinfection and the evolution of virulence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 261, 209215.Google Scholar
McIvor, C. A. and Malone, L. A. (1995). Nosema bombi, a microsporidian pathogen of the bumble bee Bombus terrestris (L.). New Zealand Journal of Zoology 22, 2531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morand, S., Manning, S. D. and Woolhouse, M. E. J. (1996). Parasite-host coevolution and geographic patterns of parasite infectivity and host susceptibility. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 263, 119128.Google ScholarPubMed
Novotny, J. (1991). Influence of gypsy-moth larvae age on the development of microsporidian diseases. Biologia 46, 105111.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A. and May, R. M. (1994). Superinfection and the evolution of parasite virulence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 255, 8189.Google ScholarPubMed
Pomeroy, N. and Plowright, R. C. (1980). Maintenance of bumble bee colonies in observation hives (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Canadian Entomologist 112, 321326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regoes, R. R., Nowak, M. A. and Bonhoeffer, S. (2000). Evolution of virulence in a heterogenous host population. Evolution 54, 6471.Google Scholar
Rodd, F. H., Plowright, R. C. and Owen, R. E. (1980). Mortality rates of adult bumble bee workers (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 58, 17181721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz-González, M. X. and Brown, M. J. F. (2006). Males vs workers: testing the assumptions of the haploid susceptibility hypothesis in bumblebees. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 60, 501509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid-Hempel, P. (2001). On the evolutionary ecology of host-parasite interactions: addressing the question with regard to bumblebees and their parasites. Naturwissenschaften 88, 147158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmid-Hempel, P. and Heeb, D. (1991). Worker mortality and colony development in bumblebees, Bombus lucoruum (L.) (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft 64, 93108.Google Scholar
Schmid-Hempel, P. and Loosli, R. (1998). A contribution to the knowledge of Nosema infections in bumble bees, Bombus spp. Apidologie 29, 525535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shykoff, J. A. and Schmid-Hempel, P. (1991). Incidence and effects of four parasites in natural populations of bumble bees in Switzerland. Apidologie 22, 117125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tay, W. T., O'Mahony, E. M. and Paxton, R. J. (2005). Complete rRNA gene sequence reveal that the microsporidium Nosema bombi infects diverse bumble bee (Bombus spp.) hosts, and contains multiple polymorphic sites. Journal of Eucaryotic Microbiology 52, 505513.Google Scholar
Undeen, A. H. , A. H. and Avery, S. W. (1988). Ammonium chloride inhibition of the germination of spores of Nosema algerae (Microspora: Nosematidae). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 52, 326334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velthuis, H. H. W. and van Doorn, A. (2006). A century of advances in bumblebee domestication and the economic and environmental aspects of its commercialization for pollination. Apidologie 37, 421451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vizoso, D. B. and Ebert, D. (2005). Mixed inoculations of a microsporidian parasite of with horizontal and vertical infections. Oecologia 143, 157166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whittington, R. and Winston, M. L. (2003). Effects of Nosema bombi and its treatment fumagillin on bumble bee (Bombus occidentalis) colonies. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 84, 5458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Numbers of infected and non-infected individuals as determined by molecular analyses of homogenized abdomens 21 days after inoculation with Nosema bombi

Figure 1

Table 2. Numbers of infected and non-infected individuals as determined by dissections and visual detection of spores 21 days after inoculation with Nosema bombi

Figure 2

Fig. 1. Differences in Nosema bombi spore counts (based on 1 ml dilution of homogenate) between animals infected by single and trickle lucorum spore dosage. Data points are boxplots, showing the median value with the box marking the interquartile range; numbers above bars indicate the sample size in each colony; the circle above the bar indicates an outlier.