Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T02:41:45.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of temperature on pupa development and sexual maturity of laboratory Anastrepha obliqua adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2011

R. Telles-Romero
Affiliation:
Departamento de Entomología Tropical, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Carretera Antiguo Aeropuerto, CP 30700, Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico
J. Toledo
Affiliation:
Departamento de Entomología Tropical, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Carretera Antiguo Aeropuerto, CP 30700, Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico
E. Hernández
Affiliation:
Programa Moscafrut – Desarrollo de Métodos, Central Poniente No. 14, and 2da. Avenida Sur, CP 30700, Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico
J.L. Quintero-Fong
Affiliation:
Programa Moscafrut – Desarrollo de Métodos, Central Poniente No. 14, and 2da. Avenida Sur, CP 30700, Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico
L. Cruz-López*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Entomología Tropical, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Carretera Antiguo Aeropuerto, CP 30700, Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: 52 (962) 6289806 E-mail: lcruz@ecosur.mx
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of four temperatures (18, 20, 25 and 30°C) on pupa development and sexual maturity of Anastrepha obliqua adults was investigated under laboratory conditions. The results showed that the duration of the pupal stage decreased with an increase in temperature (29, 25, 13 and 12 days, respectively), and maintaining the pupae at 18°C and 20°C results in a low percentage of pupation, pupa weight loss and lesser flying ability. However, it significantly favored sexual behavior, a higher proportion of sexual calls and matings. While enhanced pupa development was observed at a temperature of 30°C, adults had low sexual efficiency, as well as a lower proportion of calls and matings. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis of male volatiles showed that the amount of (Z,E)-α-farnesene did not vary among males from pupae reared at different temperatures; however, less (E,E)-α-farnesene was emitted by males obtain from pupa reared at 30°C. Male flies kept at 30°C during their larval stage had more (Z)-3-nonenol and, also, an unknown compound was detected. The fecundity of the females was higher at low temperatures. Regarding fertility, no significant differences were found between temperatures. The optimal temperature on pupa development was 25°C when males displayed ideal attributes for rearing purposes.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Introduction

The West Indian fruit fly, Anastrepha obliqua (Macquart) (Diptera: Tephritidae), is distributed throughout the Americas and can be found from the southern United States to Brazil (Hernández-Ortiz & Aluja, Reference Hernández-Ortiz and Aluja1993). In Mexico, it is the second most economically important species affecting mango (Mangifera indica L.) production and marketing (Aluja, Reference Aluja1994). Control of this pest is carried out through integrated pest management, in which the Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) is the key element (Rull-Gabayet et al., Reference Rull-Gabayet, Reyes-Flores, Enkerlin, McPheron and Teck1996; Reyes et al., Reference Reyes, Santiago, Hernández and Tan2000; Enkerlin, Reference Enkerlin, Dyck, Hendrichs and Robinson2005). However, SIT success depends on the quality of the sterile insects released, which is closely related to optimal environmental conditions for development during the mass-rearing process (Schwartz et al., Reference Schwartz, Zambada, Orozco, Zavala and Calkins1985; Vargas, Reference Vargas, Robinson and Hooper1989; Artiaga-López et al., Reference Artiaga-López, Hernández, Dominguez-Gordillo, Orozco-Dávila and Brian2004; Klassen & Curtis, Reference Klassen, Curtis, Dyck, Hendrichs and Robinson2005; Cáceres et al., Reference Cáceres, Ramírez, Wornoayporn, Islam and Ahmad2007). Temperature is one of the most important environmental factors in insect mass-rearing, affecting development time, maturation and survival (Kemp & Bosch, Reference Kemp and Bosch2005; Kalaitzaki et al., Reference Kalaitzaki, Lykouressis, Perdikis and Alexandrakis2007). In fruit flies, it is directly related to pupa development time and adult emergence (Vargas et al., Reference Vargas, Walsh, Jang, Armstrong and Kanehisa1996, Reference Vargas, Walsh, Kanehisa, Stark and Nishida2000; Taufer et al., Reference Taufer, Nascimento, Cruz and Oliveira2000; Donoso et al., Reference Donoso, Jimenez, Ponce and Sarabia2003). For Ceratitis capitata (Wied.), it has been determined that the optimum conditions for the development of pupae is between 20°C and 25°C with 75% and 90% RH (Langley et al., Reference Langley, Maly and Ruhm1972). In Anastrepha ludens (Loew) and Anastrepha suspensa (Wied.), it is reported that, under relaxed rearing conditions (25°C), pupa weight increases and adult mating ability is improved (Prescott & Baranowski, Reference Prescott and Baranowski1971; Meza et al., Reference Meza, Díaz-Fleisher and Orozco2005; Orozco-Dávila et al., Reference Orozco-Dávila, Hernández, Solís, Quintero, Domínguez, Sugayama, Zucchi, Ovruski and Sivinski2008). Moreover, pupa eye colour is used as an indicator of pupa maturation, and the rate of change is sensitive to temperature variations (Resilva et al., Reference Resilva, Obra, Zamora and Gaitan2007). Despite an abundance of research dealing with the effect of temperature on the biology of fruit flies, little is known of the effect of temperature on adult performance. The main aim of this study was to investigate the effect of temperature on A. obliqua pupal development, production of sexual pheromone compounds, sexual calling propensity, male mating competitiveness, and female fecundity and fertility.

Material and methods

Biological material

Eight-day-old mass-reared larvae (close to pupation) were obtained from the Moscafrut facility, located in Metapa de Dominguez, Chiapas, Mexico. Flies were reared under standard operational protocol (Artiaga-López et al., Reference Artiaga-López, Hernández, Dominguez-Gordillo, Orozco-Dávila and Brian2004) for about 128 generations. Wild flies were obtained as larvae from infested Spondias mombin L. fruit collected in the Soconusco Region, Chiapas, Mexico.

Experimental protocol

For pupation, batches of 1000 third instar larvae were placed in 22×12×3.5-cm plastic trays with 100 g of vermiculite. The trays were placed in different environmental chambers (Percival Scientific No. Series 02-EC-184-007) at 18, 20, 25 and 30°C and 65–85% RH until adult emergence. Once the adults emerged, they were sorted by sex and placed in 30×30×30-cm glass cages, covered on one side by a 2-mm tull mesh and kept in separated rooms. Adults were fed ad libitum with a mixture of enzymatically hydrolyzed yeast (ICN Biomedical, Aurora, OH, USA) and sucrose in a 1:3 ratio, and water was provided in 500-ml plastic bottles covered with a cotton wick. These adult cages were kept in the laboratory at a temperature of 25±1°C, 65±5% RH, and 12:12 L:D photoperiod (07:00–19:00 h light, and 550±50 lux light intensity).

Field cage tests were carried out in a mango (M. indica L.) cv. Ataulfo orchard located in the municipality of Tapachula (14°10–15°20 N, 92°10–93°10 W, 180 m altitude), Chiapas, Mexico. The temperature in the orchard fluctuated from 18°C to 33°C and RH from 50% to 70%.

Effect of temperature on pupation and pupae weight

Following the exposure of 1000-larvae samples to each temperature treatment for 24 h, pupation percentage was calculated. Ten samples of 100 pupae, each from different batches of larvae, were extracted for each temperature treatment. In accordance with the method described in the FAO/IAEA/USDA manual, each sample of pupae was weighed on an analytical balance (Ohaus Model AP2105, Pine Brook, NJ, USA). Pupation percentage and mean pupal weight were estimated following the procedures described in the Quality Control Manual (FAO/IAEA/ USDA, 2003).

Pupal development time, adult emergence and flying ability

Pupal development time was estimated as the number of days from pupation to adult emergence. Pupa viability was determined from 100-pupae samples. Twenty replicates for each temperature were done. The pupae from each sample were placed in 100×15-mm Petri dishes inside 8.9 cm diameter×10 cm height black PVC tubes. The inner wall of each tube was coated with talcum powder to prevent flies from escaping by walking out of the tube. The tubes were placed inside a field cage (3 m diameter×2 m height) (Calkins & Webb, Reference Calkins and Webb1983; Chambers et al., Reference Chambers, Calkins, Boller, Itó and Cunningham1983) for six days. After six days, the number of non-emerged pupae and non-flying adults was recorded and the percentage of fliers was estimated (FAO/IAEA/USDA, 2003).

Male sexual maturity

To assess male sexual maturity, a two-factor experimental design was used. The first factor was temperature (18, 20, 25 and 30°C) and the second factor was age (4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 days). There were a total of 20 treatments, each replicated 20 times, using 30 males placed in 30×30×30-cm glass cages. Observations were made every half hour; calling behavior was used as a signal of sexual maturation and was determined by vigorous wing fanning, everted prostiger and puffed pleural glands. Observations were carried out from 07:00 to 11:00 h, when sexual activity in A. obliqua is at its peak (Aluja & Birke, Reference Aluja and Birke1993). Laboratory temperature was 25±2°C.

Collection of volatiles emitted by males

Samples of ten 8-day-old males were used for volatile collections. Collections were made between 08:00 and 10:00 h. Twenty replicates for each temperature from different cohorts were carried out. Volatiles emitted by calling A. obliqua males were collected using the system described by Heath & Manukian (Reference Heath and Manukian1992). Collected volatiles were eluted with 200 μl methylene chloride. Each sample was deposited in a vial, sealed and stored at −20°C until required in the chemical analysis. Volatile collection was carried out in the laboratory at a temperature of 25±2°C, 50–60% RH and lighting of 700 lux provided by fluorescent lamps placed 3 m from the collection tubes.

Chemical analysis

Volatile analysis was carried out using a Varian Star 3400 CX gas chromatograph coupled to a Varian Saturn 4D mass spectrometer, using helium as a gas carrier, with an initial temperature of 50°C maintained for two minutes then increased to 15°C min–1, until reaching 280°C. Before injecting each sample, 20 μl of tridecane as internal standard was added to obtain a concentration of 100 ng μl−1. Quantification of the four compounds present in the blend was done by measuring the area of the chromatogram peaks and comparing it with the internal standard. The compounds were identified using their retention times, Kovat index (KI) and mass spectra, and then comparing these data with those of synthetic standards. Synthetic standards of farnesene (mixture of isomers that includes (E,E)-α-farnesene and (Z,E)-α-farnesene) and (Z)-3-nonenol were supplied by Aldrich (Toluca, Mexico). Amounts of volatile compounds released by males are reported in nanograms per male per hour.

Sexual competitiveness

Twenty mass-reared males from each temperature treatment, 20 wild males and 50 wild females (a total of 150 insects) were released in each field cage (Calkins & Webb, Reference Calkins and Webb1983; Chambers et al., Reference Chambers, Calkins, Boller, Itó and Cunningham1983). Mass-reared males were eight days old and wild flies were 15 days old. Mango trees (1.5 m high) were placed inside each field cage (Meza-Hernández et al., Reference Meza-Hernández, Hernández, Salvador-Figueroa and Cruz-López2002).

For identification, males from each treatment were marked with a numbered (Arial type size 3) small paper tag (2 mm in diameter) glued onto the flies’ thorax (Meza & Díaz-Fleisher, Reference Meza and Díaz-Fleisher2006) 48 h previous to the experiment conducted between 07:00 and 11:00 h. The number and type of matings were recorded. Each temperature at which males developed from pupae was considered a treatment; 25°C was considered the control. Six replicates per treatment were carried out.

Fecundity and fertility

Fecundity was estimated as the number of eggs per female per day. Ten sexually mature pairs (eight days old) were placed in 20×20×20-cm plexiglass cages at 25±2°C, 65±5% HR and 550±50 lux. An oviposition panel (cylindrical, plastic, 4 cm long×5.5 cm diameter, decked at one end with tergal white fabric as an oviposition substrate and coated with silicon on the inside) filled with distilled water stained with artificial green dye (McCormick of Mexico, S.A. de C.V.), was placed at the top of each cage. The eggs laid were collected daily over a period of ten days. To determine egg hatch, the eggs were incubated on a wet cloth, placed over a water saturated sponge in a 100×15-mm plastic Petri dish and maintained at 25°C for five days, considering fertility as the percentage of hatched eggs. Each treatment was replicated ten times.

Statistical analyses

Data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) (Ott & Longnecker, Reference Ott and Longnecker2001) followed by a Tukey separation of means test. The data on percentage of pupation, viability and egg hatch were transformed to arcsine of the square root of the proportion (χ=Sen−1$\sqrt \chi $, where χ was the original proportion (percentage/100)) (Zar, Reference Zar1999). When a Bartlett test (Zar, Reference Zar1999) for equal variances was not significant for arcsine transformed data (P≤0.05), a one way analysis of variance was applied; and the separation of means was performed by applying a Fisher PLSD test. A two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the effect of temperature on the calling behavior of males and on the quantity of released volatile compounds. Means were compared by the Tukey test (P≤0.05). StatView 5.01 (SAS Institute, 2001) was used for all the analysis.

Results

Effect of temperature on pupation and pupa weight

Differences in larval pupation were significant (F=12.09; df=3, 40; P<0.05) (table 1). The lowest percentage of larva pupation was recorded when pupae developed at 18°C, while the percentages were higher at 20, 25 and 30°C, but the differences were not significant. Differences in pupa weight loss were also significant (F=58.12; df=3, 98; P<0.05) (table 1). The greatest loss occurred at 18°C, followed by 20°C. The lowest loss was observed at 25°C and 30°C.

Table 1. Percentage of pupation and weight loss experienced by A. obliqua pupae at different temperatures.

Different letters within columns (a, b, c) indicate significant differences (P<0.05).

Pupal development time, adult emergence and flying ability

The duration of the pupal stage decreased with an increase in temperature (fig. 1), displayed by the regression equation log y=3.84–1.89 log(x), r2=93.1 (F=26.89; df=1, 2; P=0.035). The greater emergence percentages were observed at 25°C and 30°C, while the lowest was at 18°C; the differences were significant (F=218.57; df=3, 97; P<0.05). The highest percentage of flyers occurred at 25°C and the lowest at 18°C and 20°C; again the differences were significant (F=196.94; df=3, 97; P<0.05) (table 2).

Fig. 1. Regression of temperature on A. obliqua pupal development time (r2=93.1; F=26.89; P=0.035).

Table 2. Emergence percentage and percentage of A. obliqua flyers (emerged flies capable of flight) exposed to different temperatures during their pupal stage.

Different letters within columns (a, b, c) indicate significant differences (P<0.05).

Male sexual maturity

Male sexual maturity, expressed by sexual calling, was observed as of six days of age, regardless of temperature treatment. Calling behavior was significantly affected by temperature (F=5.33; df=3, 144; P<0.05) by age (F=48.51; df=3, 144; P<0.05), and the temperature-age interaction was significant (F=3.68; df=9, 144; P<0.05). Six-day-old males displayed an increase in activity at 18°C and 20°C. On the eighth day, males reared at 30°C showed reduced calling propensity. On the tenth day, males developed at 18°C showed the lowest calling propensity. On day 12, the flies that developed at 20°C were those that exhibited greatest sexual activity (fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Sexual calling of A. obliqua males from pupae developed at different temperatures. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences (P<0.05).

Volatiles emitted by males

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis demonstrated that the males from pupae reared at different temperatures qualitatively released the same mixture of compounds, mainly (E,E)-α-farnesene, (Z,E)-α-farnesene and (Z)-3-nonenol, previously identified by Heath et al. (Reference Heath, Landolt, Robacker, Dueben, Epsky, Aluja and Norrbom2000), Ibáñez-López & Cruz-López (Reference Ibáñez-López and Cruz-López2001) and an unidentified compound also described by López-Guillén (Reference López-Guillén2008). However, the released compounds (E,E)-α-farnesene, the unknown compound and (Z)-3-nonenol varied quantitatively with temperature (F=76.91; df=3, 908; P<0.05). The amounts of (Z,E)-α-farnesene emitted were not significantly different among temperatures (F=0.83; df=3, 59; P>0.05) (fig. 3).

Fig. 3. Amount of volatiles emitted by 8-day-old A.obliqua males from pupae reared at different temperatures.

Effect of temperature on sexual competition

During sexual competition, it was noted that the number of wild male matings was significantly greater than that of the mass-reared males (F=13.69; df=4, 25; P<0.05) (fig. 4). However, among mass-reared flies, males from pupae developed at 18°C and 20°C recorded the largest number of matings (F=13.69; df=4, 25; P>0.05), and males from pupae developed at 30°C recorded the lowest number of matings (F=13.69; df=4, 25; P<0.05).

Fig. 4. Sexual competition between A. obliqua males exposed to different temperatures in their pupal stage and wild insects. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences (P<0.05).

Effect of temperature on fecundity and fertility

The largest numbers of eggs were produced by females from pupae developed at 18°C and the lowest quantity by females from pupae developed at 30°C. At temperatures of 20°C and 25°C no significant differences were found (F=1.74; df=3, 36; P>0.05) (table 3). Regarding fertility, no significant differences were found among females from pupae reared at different temperatures (F=0.78; df=3, 36; P>0.05) (table 3).

Table 3. Fecundity and fertility of A. obliqua females from pupae that developed at different temperatures.

Different letters within columns (a, b, c) indicate significant differences (P<0.05).

Discussion

The influence of temperature during development and its effect on biological phase and quality of A. obliqua adults were studied. The lower pupation and greater weight loss of larvae exposed to 18°C could be attributed to increased dehydration caused by a longer development period. As expected, temperature showed a significant effect on pupal development time. These results were similar to those found in Ceratitis capitata (Wied.), where temperature was directly related to the development of the pupal phase (Crovetti et al., Reference Crovetti, Conti, Delrio and Cavalloro1986). In the case of flyers, it has been reported that both radiation and storage temperature lead to a reduction of flight ability (Toledo et al., Reference Toledo, Rull, Oropeza, Hernández and Liedo2004; Resilva et al., Reference Resilva, Obra, Zamora and Gaitan2007). Our results show a similar tendency since the lowest percentages of flyers were recorded in adults from pupae that were developed at 18°C and 20°C.

Sexual activity in A. obliqua has been evaluated in relation to various parameters such as age, time of day, effect of irradiation and host presence (Aluja & Birke, Reference Aluja and Birke1993; López-Guillén et al., Reference López-Guillén, Cruz-López, Malo, González-Hernández, Llanderal-Cazares, López-Collado, Toledo and Rojas2008). However, there were no studies on how temperature conditions during pupal development affect their sexual performance. We found that low temperatures during development (18°C and 20°C) gave rise to males with greater calling and mating propensity. This could be explained as a result of the relaxed development of the sexual organs at low temperatures allowing more time for a homogeneous maturation (Fletcher, Reference Fletcher, Robinson and Hooper1989; Taufer et al., Reference Taufer, Nascimento, Cruz and Oliveira2000). Another explication could be that at higher temperatures the crowded conditions produce metabolic heat, which could have a detrimental effect on the sexual behavior of the adults. A third reason could be heterogeneity selection, where higher mortality at the pupal stage produces more robust and competitive adults at the lower temperatures.

The amounts of (Z,E)-α-farnesene released by males from pupae developed at the four temperatures did not show significant differences. However, more (E,E)-α-farnesene was produced at temperatures of 18°C, 20°C and 25°C than at 30°C. Males originating from pupae exposed to 30°C displayed higher production of the unidentified compound and (Z)-3-nonenol, compared with males from other temperatures. It is possible that increased production of this compound by males at 30°C affected attraction by wild females, since it is known that, if volatile compound concentration varies, behavioral responses could be different (McNeil, Reference McNeil1991). In the sexual competition experiment, males from pupae which developed at 30°C recorded the lowest number of matings. In males from pupae that developed at 25°C, the amount of volatile emitted decreased after reaching ten days of age but showed slight recovery at 14 days; a similar trend was observed by López-Guillén (Reference López-Guillén2008). This suggests that accelerated development at temperatures of up to 30°C had an adverse effect on the insects’ sexual maturity, resulting in a change in volatile production. Possibly, heat stress caused deficient development of their sexual organs (Fletcher, Reference Fletcher, Robinson and Hooper1989; Taufer et al., Reference Taufer, Nascimento, Cruz and Oliveira2000). Our results show that A. obliqua male calling behavior started in all treatments at six days of age when the number of males calling was lower than at 8, 10 and 12 days old. López-Guillén et al. (Reference López-Guillén, Cruz-López, Malo, González-Hernández, Llanderal-Cazares, López-Collado, Toledo and Rojas2008) point out that the emission of volatiles is significantly affected by age in A. obliqua males.

Regarding female fertility, we found no significant differences among temperature treatments. However, females from pupae that developed at lower temperatures showed the highest level of fecundity. The 17-day-old difference in development time between the highest and lowest temperatures could explain the difference in egg production. Longer developmental time resulted in greater capacity for egg production. But, when pupa development was at 25°C, it resulted in a shorter development period (13 days), a reduction in weight loss, a high percentage of pupation, emergence and flyers, and an increase in egg production. All these attributes are ideal for rearing purposes.

In conclusion, in this study, we found a marked effect of pupal development temperature on pupa development time, adult emergence, sexual maturity, mating competitiveness and female fecundity of A. obliqua flies. It appears that the main advantage for keeping pupae at 25°C, instead of 18°C or 20°C, is the drastic reduction in pupal developmental time, which is important in reducing infections and rearing costs. In addition, this temperature favors adult emergence and flying ability. In contrast, pupa weight and mating competitiveness were significantly favored when pupae developed at 18°C and 20°C. Based on these results, an environmental temperature of 25°C during pupal developmental time is recommended for A. obliqua mass-rearing.

Acknowledgements

We thank G. Rodas and A. Román for technical assistance in this investigation and J. Dominguez and T. Artiaga-López from the Moscafrut Facility (SAGARPA-IICA) for providing the biological material used in this study. The Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) provided support through a scholarship for graduate studies to R.T.R.

References

Aluja, M. (1994) Bionomics and management of Anastrepha. Annual Review of Entomology 39, 155173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aluja, M. & Birke, A. (1993) Habitat use by adults of Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera: Tephritidae) in a mixed mango and tropical, plum orchard. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 86, 799812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Artiaga-López, T., Hernández, E., Dominguez-Gordillo, J. & Orozco-Dávila, D. (2004) Mass-production of Anastrepha obliqua at the Moscafrut fruit fly facility, Mexico. pp. 389392in Brian, B.N. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 6th International Fruit Fly Symposium. 6–10 May 2002, Heriotdale, Johannesburg, South Africa.Google Scholar
Cáceres, C., Ramírez, E., Wornoayporn, V.S., Islam, M. & Ahmad, S. (2007) A protocol for storage and long-distance shipment of Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) eggs. I. Effect of temperature, embryo age, and storage time on survival and quality. Florida Entomologist 90, 103109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calkins, C.O. & Webb, J.C. (1983) A cage and support framework for behavioral tests of fruit flies in the field. Florida Entomologist 66, 512514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, D.L., Calkins, C.O., Boller, E.F., Itó, Y. & Cunningham, R.T. (1983) Measuring, monitoring, and improving the quality of mass-reared Mediterranean fruit flies, Ceratitis capitata Wied. 2. Field tests for confirming and extending laboratory results. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 95, 285303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crovetti, T., Conti, B. & Delrio, G. (1986) Effect of abiotic factors on Ceratitis capitata (Wied.) (Diptera: Tephritidae) - II. Pupal development under constant temperatures. pp. 141147in Cavalloro, R. (Ed.) Fruit Flies of Economic Importance. Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Balkema.Google Scholar
Donoso, H., Jimenez, M., Ponce, L. & Sarabia, C. (2003) Determination of the physiological maturity of Medfly pupae by accumulation of temperature during pre-irradiation period for use in SIT programmes. pp. 143149 in Proceedings of the 3rd RCM on ‘Quality Assurance in Mass-Reared and Released Fruit Flies for use in SIT Programmes’. 19–23 May 2003, Perth, Australia, International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Enkerlin, W.R. (2005) Impact of fruit fly control programmes using the Sterile Insect Technique. pp. 651676in Dyck, V.A., Hendrichs, J. & Robinson, A.S. (Eds) Sterile Insect Technique: Principles and Practice in Area-wide Integrated Pest Management. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO/IAEA/USDA (2003) Manual for Product Quality Control and Shipping Procedures for Sterile Mass-Reared Tephritid Fruit Flies. Version 5.0. Vienna, Austria, International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Fletcher, B.S. (1989) Temperature-development rate relationship of the immature stage and adults of Tephritids fruit flies. pp. 283289in Robinson, A.S. & Hooper, G. (Eds) World Crop Pests: Fruit Flies, their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, vol. 3A. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Heath, R.R. & Manukian, A. (1992) Development and evaluation of systems to collect volatile semiochemicals from insects and plants using a charcoal-infused medium for air purification. Journal of Chemical Ecology 18, 12091226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heath, R.R., Landolt, P.J., Robacker, D.C., Dueben, B.D. & Epsky, N.D. (2000) Sexual pheromones of tephritid flies: clues to unravel phylogeny and behavior. pp. 793809in Aluja, M. & Norrbom, A. (Eds) Fruit Flies (Tephritidae): Phylogeny and Evolution of Behavior. Boca Raton, FL, USA, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Hernández-Ortiz, V. & Aluja, M. (1993) Listado de especies del género neotropical Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae) con notas sobre su distribución y plantas hospederas. Folia Entomológica Mexicana 88, 89105.Google Scholar
Ibáñez-López, A. & Cruz-López, L. (2001) Glándulas salivales de Anastrepha obliqua (Macquart) (Diptera: Tephritidae): Análisis químico y morfológico, y actividad biológica de los componentes volátiles. Folia Entomológica Mexicana 40, 221231.Google Scholar
Kalaitzaki, A.P., Lykouressis, D.P., Perdikis, D.Ch. & Alexandrakis, V.Z. (2007) Effect of temperature on development and survival of the parasitoid Pnigalio pectinicornis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) reared on Phyllocnistis citrella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae). Environmental Entomology 36, 497505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kemp, W.P. & Bosch, J. (2005) Effect of temperature on Osmia lignaria (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) prepupa-adult development, survival, and emergence. Journal of Economic Entomology 98, 19171923.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klassen, W. & Curtis, C.F. (2005) History of the sterile insect technique. pp. 336in Dyck, V.A., Hendrichs, J. & Robinson, A.S. (Eds) Sterile Insect Technique: Principles and Practice in Area-wide Integrated Pest Management. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, P.A., Maly, H. & Ruhm, F. (1972) Application of the sterility principle for the control of the Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata): Pupal metabolism in relation to mass-rearing techniques. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 15, 2334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Guillén, G. (2008) Estímulos químicos y visuales como potenciales atrayentes de Anastrepha obliqua (Macquart) (Diptera: Tephritidae). PhD thesis, Colegio de Postgraduados, Texcoco, Estado de México, México.Google Scholar
López-Guillén, G., Cruz-López, L., Malo, E.A., González-Hernández, H., Llanderal-Cazares, C., López-Collado, J., Toledo, J. & Rojas, J.C. (2008) Factors influencing the release of volatiles in Anastrepha obliqua males (Diptera: Tephritidae). Environmental Entomology 37, 876882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeil, J.N. (1991) Behavioral ecology of pheromone-mediated communication in moths and its importance in the use of pheromone traps. Annual Review of Entomology 36, 407430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meza-Hernández, J.S., Hernández, E., Salvador-Figueroa, M. & Cruz-López, L. (2002) Sexual compatibility, mating performance and sex pheromone release of mass-reared and wild Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera: Tephritidae) under field-cage conditions. pp. 99104 in Proceedings of the 6th International Fruit Fly Symposium. 6–10 May 2002, Stellenbosch, South Africa.Google Scholar
Meza, J.S. & Díaz-Fleisher, F. (2006) Comparison of sexual compatibility between laboratory and wild Mexican fruit flies under laboratory and field conditions. Journal of Economic Entomology 99, 19791986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meza, J.S., Díaz-Fleisher, F. & Orozco, D. (2005) Pupariation time as a source de variability in mating performance in mass-reared Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 98, 19301936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orozco-Dávila, D., Hernández, R., Solís, E., Quintero, L. & Domínguez, J. (2008) Establishment of a colony of Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) under relaxed mass-rearing conditions in Mexico. pp. 335339in Sugayama, R.L., Zucchi, R.A., Ovruski, S.M. & Sivinski, J. (Eds). Fruit Flies of Economic Importance: From Basic to Applied Knowledge. 10–15 September 2006, Salvador, Brazil, Press Color Graficos Especializados.Google Scholar
Ott, R.L. & Longnecker, M. (2001) An Introduction to Statistics Methods and Data Analyses. 5th edn.Pacific Grove, CA, USA, Duxbury Publishers.Google Scholar
Prescott, J.A. & Baranowski, R.M. (1971) Effects of temperature on the immature stages of Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae). Florida Entomologist 54, 297303.Google Scholar
Resilva, S., Obra, G., Zamora, N. & Gaitan, E. (2007) Development of quality control procedures for mass produced and released Bactrocera philippinensis (Diptera: Tephritidae) for sterile insect technique programs. Florida Entomologist 90, 5863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyes, J., Santiago, G. & Hernández, P. (2000) Mexican fruit fly eradication programme. pp. 377380in Tan, K.H. (Ed.) Area-wide Control of Fruit Flies and Other Insect Pests. Penang, Malaysia, Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia.Google Scholar
Rull-Gabayet, J.A., Reyes-Flores, J. & Enkerlin, W.H. (1996) The Mexican national fruit fly eradication campaign: largest fruit fly industrial complex in the world. pp. 561563in McPheron, B.A. & Teck, G.J. (Eds) Fruit Fly Pests: A World Assessment of their Biology and Management. Delray Beach, FL, USA, St Lucie Press.Google Scholar
SAS Institute (2001) SAS User´s guide: Statistics, Version 8.2. Cary, USA.Google Scholar
Schwartz, A.J., Zambada, A., Orozco, D.H.S., Zavala, J.L. & Calkins, C.O. (1985) Mass production of the Mediterranean fruit fly at Metapa, Mexico. Florida Entomologist 68, 467477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taufer, M., Nascimento, J.C., Cruz, I.B.M. & Oliveira, A.K. (2000) Efeito da temperatura na maturação ovariana e longevidade de Anastrepha fraterculus (Wied.) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Anais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil 29, 639648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toledo, J., Rull, J., Oropeza, A., Hernández, E. & Liedo, P. (2004) Irradiation of Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera: Tephritidae) revisited: Optimizing sterility induction. Journal of Economic Entomology 97, 383389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vargas, R.I. (1989) Mass production of Tephritid fruit flies. pp. 141152. in Robinson, A.S. & Hooper, G. (Eds) World Crop Pests: Fruit Flies, their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, vol 3B. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Vargas, R.I., Walsh, W.A., Jang, E.B., Armstrong, J.W. & Kanehisa, D.T. (1996) Survival and development of immature stages of four Hawaiian fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) reared at five constant temperatures. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 89, 6469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargas, R.I., Walsh, W.A., Kanehisa, D.J., Stark, D. & Nishida, T. (2000) Comparative demography of three Hawaiian fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) at alternating temperature. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 93, 7581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar, J.H. (1999) Biostatistical Analysis. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Percentage of pupation and weight loss experienced by A. obliqua pupae at different temperatures.

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Regression of temperature on A. obliqua pupal development time (r2=93.1; F=26.89; P=0.035).

Figure 2

Table 2. Emergence percentage and percentage of A. obliqua flyers (emerged flies capable of flight) exposed to different temperatures during their pupal stage.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Sexual calling of A. obliqua males from pupae developed at different temperatures. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences (P<0.05).

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Amount of volatiles emitted by 8-day-old A.obliqua males from pupae reared at different temperatures.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Sexual competition between A. obliqua males exposed to different temperatures in their pupal stage and wild insects. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences (P<0.05).

Figure 6

Table 3. Fecundity and fertility of A. obliqua females from pupae that developed at different temperatures.