Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T15:57:22.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contribution to the knowledge of the deep brachyuran fauna (Crustacea: Decapoda) in waters off Mauritania (NW Africa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2016

Susana S. De Matos-Pita*
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad de Vigo, Campus Lagoas-Marcosende, Vigo 36310, Pontevedra, España Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de Vigo, Subida Radio Faro 50, Vigo 36390, Pontevedra, España
Sara Castillo
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad de Vigo, Campus Lagoas-Marcosende, Vigo 36310, Pontevedra, España Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de Vigo, Subida Radio Faro 50, Vigo 36390, Pontevedra, España
Fran Ramil*
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad de Vigo, Campus Lagoas-Marcosende, Vigo 36310, Pontevedra, España
*
Correspondence should be addressed to:S.S. de Matos-Pita and F. Ramil, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad de Vigo, Campus Lagoas-Marcosende, Vigo 36310, Pontevedra, España email: soto@uvigo.es framil@uvigo.es
Correspondence should be addressed to:S.S. de Matos-Pita and F. Ramil, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad de Vigo, Campus Lagoas-Marcosende, Vigo 36310, Pontevedra, España email: soto@uvigo.es framil@uvigo.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Four multidisciplinary oceanographic surveys were conducted in November and December from 2007 to 2010, along the Mauritanian coast (NW Africa). A total of 10,514 brachyuran crabs belonging to 33 species were captured in 316 hauls at depths between 79 and 1867 m. The most specious family was Inachidae represented by nine species; the remaining 24 species belonged to 16 other brachyuran families. Monodaeus cristulatus is reported for the first time since its original description. Seven other species, Ethusa rugulosa, Pseudomyra mbizi, Inachus grallator, Macropodia gilsoni, Macropodia hesperiae, Solenolambrus noordendei and Spinolambrus notialis extend their range of distribution northwards and, together with Goneplax barnardi, are reported here for the first time in Mauritanian waters. New data about depth ranges are reported for Acanthocarpus brevispinis, Ethusa rugulosa, Inachus aguiarii, Inachus grallator, Inachus nanus, Macropodia macrocheles, Solenolambrus noordendei, Spinolambrus notialis, Liocarcinus corrugatus and Monodaeus cristulatus. New data relating to the spawning period for most of the species are also included, as are some biogeographic and bathymetric considerations about brachyurans studied in the area.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2016 

INTRODUCTION

The infraorder Brachyura is regarded as the most diverse taxon within the Crustacea, with more than 6500 species (de Grave et al., Reference De Grave, Pentcheff, Ahyong, Chan, Crandall, Dworschak, Felder, Feldmann, Fransen, Goulding, Lemaitre, Low, Martin, Ng, Schweitzer, Tan, Tshudy and Wetzer2009) related to 102 families (Ahyong et al., Reference Ahyong, Lowry, Alonso, Bamber, Boxshall, Castro, Gerken, Karaman, Goy, Jones, Meland, Rogers, Svavarsson and Zhang2011).

The brachyuran fauna from the north-eastern Atlantic, and especially from European coasts, is currently one of the best known worldwide. The knowledge on diversity and distribution of decapod fauna in this region was summarized by d'Udekem d'Acoz (Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999). Further publications, mostly focused on the Mediterranean Sea, provided new information on bathymetry and/or biogeographic distributions of decapods (Maynou & Cartes, Reference Maynou and Cartes2000; Sánchez-Jerez et al., Reference Sánchez-Jerez, Barberá-Cebrián and Ramos-Esplá2000; Modena et al., Reference Modena, Mori and Vacchi2001; Abelló et al., Reference Abelló, Carbonell and Torres2002; Pipitone & Arculeo, Reference Pipitone and Arculeo2003; Company et al., Reference Company, Maiorano, Tselepides, Politou, Plaity, Rotllant and Sardà2004; Politou et al., Reference Politou, Maiorano, D'Onghia and Mytilineou2005; Ungaro et al., Reference Ungaro, Marano, Ceriola and Martino2005; Ateş et al., Reference Ateş, Katağan and Kocataş2006; Fanelli et al., Reference Fanelli, Colloca and Ardizzone2007; Pipitone & Vaccaro, Reference Pipitone, Vaccaro, Pessani, Tirelli and Froglia2011; El Lakhrach et al., Reference El Lakhrach, Hattour, Jarboui, Elhasni and Ramos-Esplá2012), or information related to new findings or the biology of a particular brachyuran species (Mura & Cau, Reference Mura and Cau2002; Giacobbe & Spano, Reference Giacobbe and Spano2006; Rossetti et al., Reference Rossetti, Sartor, Francesconi, Mori and Belcari2006; Guerao & Abelló, Reference Guerao and Abelló2007; Mavidis et al., Reference Mavidis, Türkay and Koukouras2008; Isajlović et al., Reference Isajlović, Vrgoč and Dulčić2009; Massi et al., Reference Massi, Micalizzi, Giusto and Pipitone2010; Neudecker et al., Reference Neudecker, Schiefenhövel, Kehlert and Becker2011; Capezzuto et al., Reference Capezzuto, Maiorano, Panza, Indennidate, Sion and D'Onghia2012; Porporato et al., Reference Porporato, de Domenico, Mangano, Rinelli and Spanò2012).

However, where West Africa is concerned, the only comprehensive monographs on brachyuran crabs are those by Monod (Reference Monod1956) and Manning & Holthuis (Reference Manning and Holthuis1981). In addition, some local studies on crustacean or decapod fauna were also undertaken along the West African coast, the most representative being those by Barnard (Reference Barnard1950, Reference Barnard1955) in South Africa; Macpherson (Reference Macpherson1983, Reference Macpherson1991) in Namibia; Henriksen (Reference Henriksen2009) in the Gulf of Guinea; Muñoz et al. (Reference Muñoz, García-Isarch, Sobrino, Burgos, Funny and González-Porto2012) in Guinea-Bissau; Fransen (Reference Fransen1991) in both the Canarian-Cape Verdean Region and the Banc d'Arguin (Mauritania); Anadón (Reference Anadon1981) in northern Mauritania and south-western Sahara; González Pérez (Reference González Pérez1995) in the Canary Islands and García-Raso (Reference García Raso1996) in Ibero-Moroccan waters. All these works include citations for brachyurans and collectively have improved the knowledge of this group. However, no other references focus particularly on Mauritania other than a succinct list of brachyurans (Monod, Reference Monod1933) and some scant records (Monod, Reference Monod1956; Anadón, Reference Anadon1981; Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981; Fransen, Reference Fransen1991).

From 2007 to 2010, the ECOAFRIK project, led by the Spanish Institute of Oceanography (IEO), in collaboration with the University of Vigo (Spain), carried out four annual multidisciplinary surveys in Mauritanian waters (MAURIT surveys). This work presents the taxonomic results for the deep brachyuran fauna and is the first contribution associated exclusively with this group in waters off Mauritania. We also provide new data about the geographic distribution, bathymetric range and spawning periods for some of the species studied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MAURIT surveys were conducted annually from 2007 to 2010 onboard the Spanish RV ‘Vizconde de Eza’ along the Mauritanian coast (16°05′49″N 20°48′13″W, see Map 1) in November–December.

Map 1. Sampling area showing the location of the MAURIT stations with presence of brachyurans.

A total of 316 stations were sampled at depths between 79 and 1867 m by means of two different bottom trawl gears. A total of 291 stations were sampled with a commercial trawl (Lofoten type, coded MU), following a stratified random sampling procedure. Another 25 stations were sampled with a 3.5 m beam trawl (coded MUBV) along five transects perpendicular to the coastline in five bathymetric strata (150, 300, 500, 1000, 1500 m), distributed along the Mauritanian coast (see Map 1). Station data, including coordinates, depth, date and collected species, are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Data of the MAURIT stations: date, coordinates, bathymetric range and captured species.

Samples were sorted and identified onboard to the lowest taxonomic level. For each species all the specimens were counted, weighed and pictured. A representative collection of each station and of each species was preserved in 70% ethanol and stored for further studies in the laboratory.

The classification adopted in the present work follows Ahyong et al. (Reference Ahyong, Lowry, Alonso, Bamber, Boxshall, Castro, Gerken, Karaman, Goy, Jones, Meland, Rogers, Svavarsson and Zhang2011) to the family level, and genera assignments follow de Grave et al. (Reference De Grave, Pentcheff, Ahyong, Chan, Crandall, Dworschak, Felder, Feldmann, Fransen, Goulding, Lemaitre, Low, Martin, Ng, Schweitzer, Tan, Tshudy and Wetzer2009). Subsections, superfamilies, families and species are usually listed in alphabetical order.

For each species we provide some relevant literature references, including those with the descriptions of the species that best fit with our specimens. We also provide the material examined (with additional material for some species), mention of the station code, the depth range and the number of specimens captured, in parentheses. As a measurement of specimens, we used the carapace length (CL), measured along the dorsal midline, from the base of rostrum to the posterior margin of the carapace. This measurement was obtained for males, females and ovigerous females, or combinations of all three, when appropriate. We also summarize the biological features and geographic distributions (mainly those published in the last 30 years), including the new data reported with this work, along with some remarks when required. In addition, we include pictures, mostly taken onboard when captured, of each species described.

In the laboratory, pictures were taken with a motorized Nikon SMZ25 stereomicroscope, using NIS-Elements Microscope Imaging Software, with an Extended Depth of Focus (EDF) patch.

The specimens examined for this work are largely deposited in the collections of the University of Vigo (Spain) (Marine Zoology Laboratory) and at the Oceanographic Centres of the Spanish Institute of Oceanography (IEO) in Cádiz (Collection of Decapod and Stomatopod Crustaceans, CCDE-IEOCD) and Málaga (The Marine Fauna Collection, CFM-IEOMA).

Abbreviations used are: ICMD: Biological Reference Collections samples code of the ICM-CSIC (Instituto de Ciencias del Mar-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas), Barcelona, Spain; USNM: United States Natural Museum, Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington, USA; IEO-CD: Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de Cádiz, Spain.

RESULTS

SYSTEMATICS

Order decapoda Latreille, Reference Latreille1803
Infraorder brachyura Latreille, Reference Latreille1802
Section dromiacea de Haan, Reference Haan and Siebold1833
Superfamily homoloidea de Haan, Reference Haan and Siebold1839
Family homolidae de Haan, Reference Haan and Siebold1839
Genus Homola Leach, Reference Leach1815
Homola barbata (Fabricius, Reference Fabricius1793)
(Figure 1)

Cancer barbatus Fabricius, Reference Fabricius1793: 460.

Fig. 1. Homola barbata (Fabricius, 1793), ovigerous female CL: 21.11 mm dorsal view, MU281.

Homola barbata: Guinot & Richer de Forges, Reference Guinot and Macpherson1995: 323 figs. 1A, 7A, B, 8a, b, e, 9a, 13a (references).

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MU87, 271–305 m, (2); MU88, 94–120 m, (1); MU119, 82–80 m, (1); MU120, 109–105 m, (1); MU122, 82–80 m, (1); MU128, 218–404 m, (1); MU131, 102–104 m, (1); MU158, 80–98 m, (1); MU162, 148–149 m, (1); MU184, 213–202 m, (1); MU186, 174 m, (1); MU200, 352–334 m, (7); MU204, 155–145 m, (1); MU223, 116–117 m, (2); MU281, 100–106 m, (1); MUBV02, 318–330 m, (1); MUBV21, 107–109 m, (1).

Males: 12.78–14.51 mm, females: 12.77–23.30 mm, ovigerous females: 15.53–21.11 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree well with the description provided by Manning & Holthuis (Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 25) and González-Gurriarán & Méndez (Reference González-Gurriarán, Méndez, Castro-Sada and Coruña1986: 59).

BIOLOGY

A photophilic and sciaphilic species (Pipitone & Vaccaro, Reference Pipitone, Vaccaro, Pessani, Tirelli and Froglia2011) previously cited from bottoms of mud, mud with rocks, muddy sand, muddy shells, seagrass, rocks and sometimes in caves (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999; Pipitone & Arculeo, Reference Pipitone and Arculeo2003; Pipitone & Vaccaro, Reference Pipitone, Vaccaro, Pessani, Tirelli and Froglia2011). Bathymetric range between 2 and 637 m (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999). Often holding algae or small pieces of sponges over the carapace with the fifth pair of pereiopods, and sometimes reported below the tentacles of the anemone Telmatactis cricoides (Duchassaing, 1850) (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999).

Ovigerous females have been recorded in February (García Raso, Reference García Raso1984) and from April to September (Zariquiey Álvarez, Reference Zariquiey Álvarez1968; Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981).

Our specimens were collected on coarse sand, coarse muddy sand, sandy mud with shell debris and muddy sand bottoms, at depths between 80–98 and 334–352 m. Ovigerous females were captured in November and December.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

Eastern Atlantic, from the Bay of Biscay to Angola, including the Azores, Madeira, Cape Verde, Desertas, Canary and Gulf of Guinea Islands; the Walter Shoals (E South Africa) (Guinot & Richer de Forges, Reference Guinot and Macpherson1995); Central and Western Mediterranean Basin (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999).

Later records for this species (Monteiro et al., Reference Monteiro, Araújo, Erzini and Castro2001; Pipitone & Arculeo, Reference Pipitone and Arculeo2003; Ungaro et al., Reference Ungaro, Marano, Ceriola and Martino2005; Henriksen, Reference Henriksen2009; Pipitone & Vaccaro, Reference Pipitone, Vaccaro, Pessani, Tirelli and Froglia2011; Muñoz et al., Reference Muñoz, García-Isarch, Sobrino, Burgos, Funny and González-Porto2012) fit well within this geographic distribution.

REMARKS

The ovigerous females recorded for the first time in November and December indicate that this species spawns all year round except in winter.

Paromola Wood-Mason & Alcock, Reference Wood-Mason and Alcock1891
Paromola cuvieri (Risso, Reference Risso1816)
(Figure 2A, B)

Dorippe cuvieri Risso, Reference Risso1816: 35

Fig. 2. Paromola cuvieri (Risso, 1816), adult: (A) dorsal view, MUBV03; (B) frontal view, MU140.

Paromola cuvieri: Guinot & Richer de Forges, Reference Guinot and Macpherson1995: 362, figures 2, 21a, b (references).

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MU14, 502–511 m, (1); MU18, 519–402 m, (4); MU23, 532–415 m, (17); MU37, 403–442 m, (2) MU121, 274–400 m, (1); MU140, 376–377 m, (1); MU150, 292–341 m, (2) MU157, 278–454 m, (1); MU175, 618–850 m, (1); MU188, 627 m, (1); MU263, 615–624 m, (2) MUBV03, 528–538 m, (1); MUBV22, 300 m, (1).

Male: 95.20 mm, female: 76.20 mm, megalopa: 7.78 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree well with the descriptions and figures provided by Capart (Reference Capart1951: 25) and Zariquiey Álvarez (Reference Zariquiey Álvarez1968: 301).

BIOLOGY

Deep-water species taken on bottoms with mud or sandy mud, over a cold-water coral community (Pipitone & Arculeo, Reference Pipitone and Arculeo2003; Isajlović et al., Reference Isajlović, Vrgoč and Dulčić2009; Capezzuto et al., Reference Capezzuto, Maiorano, Panza, Indennidate, Sion and D'Onghia2012). The isolated record from the Menez Gwen hydrothermal vent must be considered with caution until confirmed (Martin & Haney, Reference Martin and Haney2005). This species is often reported holding a sponge over the carapace using the fifth pereiopods (Capezzuto et al., Reference Capezzuto, Maiorano, Panza, Indennidate, Sion and D'Onghia2012) and is also found with cirripeds, gorgonians and sea anemones on carapace and legs (González, Reference González Pérez1995; Guinot & Richer de Forges, Reference Guinot and Macpherson1995). Bathymetric range usually between 80 and 300 m (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999), although the species was once reported at 10 m (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981) and up to 1165 m depth (Cartes et al., Reference Cartes, Maynou, Moranta, Massuti, Lloris and Morales-Nin2004). Ovigerous females have been recorded in March, from May to July, October and November (Zariquiey Álvarez, Reference Zariquiey Álvarez1968; Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981).

Our specimens were collected in muddy sand and sandy mud bottoms, in depths between 274–400 and 618–850 m. No ovigerous females were caught.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

North and East Atlantic, from southern Iceland, the Hebrides and southern Scandinavia, south to north-western South Africa (Tripp Seamount), including the Azores, Madeira, Canary and Cape Verde Islands; Mediterranean Sea (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999; Martin & Haney, Reference Martin and Haney2005).

Further additional records (Macpherson, Reference Macpherson1991; Maynou & Cartes, Reference Maynou and Cartes2000; Abelló et al., Reference Abelló, Carbonell and Torres2002; Biagi et al., Reference Biagi, Sartor, Ardizzone, Belcari, Belluscio and Serena2002; Pipitone & Arculeo, Reference Pipitone and Arculeo2003; Sardà et al., Reference Sardà, Company and Castellón2003; Cartes et al., Reference Cartes, Maynou, Moranta, Massuti, Lloris and Morales-Nin2004; Company et al., Reference Company, Maiorano, Tselepides, Politou, Plaity, Rotllant and Sardà2004; Politou et al., Reference Politou, Maiorano, D'Onghia and Mytilineou2005; Ungaro et al., Reference Ungaro, Marano, Ceriola and Martino2005; Fanelli et al., Reference Fanelli, Colloca and Ardizzone2007; Isajlović et al., Reference Isajlović, Vrgoč and Dulčić2009; Capezzuto et al., Reference Capezzuto, Maiorano, Panza, Indennidate, Sion and D'Onghia2012; Muñoz et al., Reference Muñoz, García-Isarch, Sobrino, Burgos, Funny and González-Porto2012) fall within this geographic range.

Section cyclodorippoida Ahyong et al., Reference Ahyong, Lai, Sharkey, Colgan and Ng2007
Superfamily cyclodorippoidea Ortmann, Reference Ortmann1892
Family cymonomidae Bouvier, Reference Bouvier1897
Genus Cymonomus A. Milne-Edwards, Reference Milne-Edwards1880
Cymonomus granulatus (Norman, in Thomson, Reference Thomson1873)
(Figure 3)

Ethusa granulata Norman in Thomson, Reference Thomson1873: 176.

Fig. 3. Cymonomus granulatus (Norman, in Thomson, 1873), adult dorsal view, MUBV10.

Cymonomus granulatus: Zariquiey Álvarez, Reference Zariquiey Álvarez1968: 813 (references).

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MUBV10, 332–344 m, (35).

Males: 4.64–5.23 mm, female: 3.52 mm, ovigerous females: 3.26–3.73 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree with those described in Milne-Edwards & Bouvier (Reference Milne-Edwards, Bouvier and Milne-Edwards1900: 34) (see Remarks).

BIOLOGY

Mainly found on shell debris and muddy bottoms (Mura & Cau, Reference Mura and Cau2002), between 155 m (García Raso, Reference García Raso1996) and 2425 m (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999). Ovigerous females reported from May to July (García Raso, Reference García Raso1996; Mura & Cau, Reference Mura and Cau2002).

Our specimens were collected at 332–344 m and ovigerous females were captured in November.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

Eastern Atlantic from SW Scotland to Mauritania; West and Central Mediterranean Sea (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999). In the Mediterranean Sea, this species has been reported in the Alborán Sea (Abelló et al., Reference Abelló, Carbonell and Torres2002) and in the Sardinian Channel (Mura & Cau, Reference Mura and Cau2002). In the NE Atlantic, Cartes et al. (Reference Cartes, Serrano, Velasco, Parra and Sánchez2007) reported the species on Le Danois Bank (Cantabrian Sea).

REMARKS

In our specimens, the mesial margin of the ocular peduncles are more tuberculate than spinulose as described by Milne-Edwards & Bouvier (Reference Milne-Edwards, Bouvier and Milne-Edwards1900: 34). The rest of the characters agree well with the referred description and, consequently, our specimens remain within this species.

This is the first time that ovigerous females are reported at the end of the year, which suggests a biannual spawning strategy for this species.

Section eubrachyura de Saint Laurent, Reference Saint Laurent1980
Subsection heterotremata Guinot, Reference Guinot1977
Superfamily calappoidea de Haan, 1833
Family calappidae de Haan, 1833
Genus Acanthocarpus Stimpson, Reference Stimpson1871
Acanthocarpus brevispinis Monod, Reference Monod1946
(Figure 4)

Acanthocarpus bispinosus Milne-Edwards, Reference Milne-Edwards1880 var. brevispinis, Monod, Reference Monod1946: 7, figures 1–4, pl. figures 1–2.

Fig. 4. Acanthocarpus brevispinis Monod, 1946, adult dorsal view, MU51.

Acanthocarpus brevispinis: Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 50 (references).

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MU51, 468–466 m, (1); MU99, 569–598 m, (1); MU121, 274–400 m, (1); MU134, 311–436 m, (1); MU143, 322 m, (4); MUBV02, 318–330 m, (1); MUBV13, 493–517 m, (3); MUBV14, 300–281 m, (9); MUBV19, 306 m, (12); MUBV22, 300 m, (7).

Males: 15.56–55.29 mm; female: 49.85 mm; ovigerous female: 55.29 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree well with the descriptions given by Capart (Reference Capart1951: 36; as Acanthocarpus africanus) and Manning & Holthuis (Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 50).

BIOLOGY

Previously reported on sandy and shelly mud bottoms (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981), at depths from 100 m (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981) to 517 m (Muñoz et al., Reference Muñoz, García-Isarch, Sobrino, Burgos, Funny and González-Porto2012). Ovigerous females have been recorded in March and October (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981).

Our specimens were collected from 274–400 to 569–598 m on sandy mud bottoms; ovigerous females were captured in December.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

West Africa from Cape Juby (S Morocco) to Namibia (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981; Macpherson, Reference Macpherson1983, Reference Macpherson1991). Further records for this species were reported by Henriksen (Reference Henriksen2009) from Nigeria and Gabon, and by Muñoz et al. (Reference Muñoz, García-Isarch, Sobrino, Burgos, Funny and González-Porto2012) from Guinea-Bissau.

REMARKS

Material from the station MU99 at 569–598 m is the deepest known record for this species; the finding of ovigerous females in December confirms a biannual spawning strategy.

Genus Calappa Weber, Reference Weber1795
Calappa pelii Herklots, Reference Herklots1851
(Figure 5)

Calappa Pelii Herklots, Reference Herklots1851: 12.

Fig. 5. Calappa pelii Herklots, 1851, female CL: 33.94 mm dorsal view, MU158.

Calappa pelii: Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 52 (references).

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MU158, 80–98 m, (1); MUBV01, 112 m, (4); MUBV15, 148–135 m, (1); MUBV21, 107–109 m, (7).

Males: 21.11–31.91 mm; females: 30.14–40.79 mm; ovigerous female: 58.87 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree well with the descriptions given by Capart (Reference Capart1951: 39, as Calappa peli) and Manning & Holthuis (Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 52).

BIOLOGY

Bottoms of mud and broken shells, usually at depths between 8–20 and 400 m. Ovigerous females reported in March, May, August, October and December (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981).

Our specimens were collected in depths between 80–98 and 135–148 m on sandy bottoms, and ovigerous females were captured in November.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

West Africa from Western Sahara to Namibia, including Principe Island, and Central Mediterranean Sea (Macpherson, Reference Macpherson1991; d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999). Recent records for this species are from Guinea-Bissau (Muñoz et al., Reference Muñoz, García-Isarch, Sobrino, Burgos, Funny and González-Porto2012) and from the Gulf of Guinea (Henriksen, Reference Henriksen2009).

Superfamily cancroidea Latreille, Reference Latreille1802
Family atelecyclidae Ortmann, Reference Ortmann1893
Genus Atelecyclus Leach, Reference Leach and Brewster1814
Atelecyclus rotundatus (Olivi, Reference Olivi1792)
(Figure 6)

Cancer rotundatus Olivi, Reference Olivi1792: 47, pl. 2 figure 2.

Fig. 6. Atelecyclus rotundatus (Olivi, 1792), female CL: 27.64 mm dorsal view, MUBV10.

Atelecyclus rotundatus: Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 68 (references); González Gurriarán & Méndez, Reference González-Gurriarán, Méndez, Castro-Sada and Coruña1986: 113, figure 38, photo 26.

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MUBV10, 332–344 m, (1).

Female: 27.64 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimen agrees well with the specifications provided by Forest (Reference Forest1957: 469) and the descriptions in González Gurriarán & Méndez (Reference González-Gurriarán, Méndez, Castro-Sada and Coruña1986: 113).

BIOLOGY

Recorded from sandy bottoms, often with gravel and small stones as well as muddy sand, shelly sand, gravel with shell debris and mud; also recorded on rocks, coralligenous substrates and in Posidonia meadows (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999; Pipitone & Arculeo, Reference Pipitone and Arculeo2003; Ateş et al., Reference Ateş, Katağan and Kocataş2006; Guillén et al. Reference Guillén, Gras, Soler and Triviño2011). Bathymetric distribution from intertidal to 795 m, usually between 9 and 300 m (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999). Ovigerous females were recorded in January and December (García Raso, Reference García Raso1984).

Only one female was collected in the MAURIT surveys between 332–344 m.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

Eastern Atlantic from SW Faroe Islands to South Africa (beyond Cape of Good Hope, Barnard, Reference Barnard1950), including the Canary, Cape Verde and Ascension Islands; Mediterranean Sea (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999).

Later records (Abelló et al., Reference Abelló, Carbonell and Torres2002; Pipitone & Arculeo, Reference Pipitone and Arculeo2003; Ateş et al., Reference Ateş, Katağan and Kocataş2006; Serrano et al., Reference Serrano, Sánchez and García-Castrillo2006, Reference Serrano, Sánchez, Punzón, Velasco and Olaso2011; García-Muñoz et al., Reference García-Muñoz, Manjón-Cabeza and García-Raso2008; Sánchez et al., Reference Sánchez, Serrano, Parra, Ballesteros and Cartes2008; Muñoz et al., Reference Muñoz, García-Isarch, Sobrino, Burgos, Funny and González-Porto2012; Ellis et al., Reference Ellis, Martinez, Burt and Scott2013) fit well within this geographic distribution.

Superfamily dorippoidea MacLeay, 1838
Family dorippidae MacLeay, 1838
Genus Medorippe Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981
Medorippe lanata (Linnaeus, Reference Linnaeus1767)
(Figure 7)

Cancer lanatus Linnaeus, Reference Linnaeus1767: 1044

Fig. 7. Medorippe lanata (Linnaeus, 1767), ovigerous female CL: 23.68 mm dorsal view, MUBV01.

.

Medorippe lanata: Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 31, figures 4a–h (references).

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MU210, 86–90 m, (1); MUBV01, 112 m, (2); MUBV21, 107–109 m, (19).

Males: 6.88–20.84 mm, female: 11.27 mm, ovigerous female: 23.68 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree well with the description and figures in Capart (Reference Capart1951: 30; as Dorippe lanata) and in Manning & Holthuis (Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 31).

BIOLOGY

Mostly recorded on soft heterogeneous substrates (mud, sandy mud, muddy sand and sand) at depths varying from 9 to 769 m (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999; El Lakhrach et al., Reference El Lakhrach, Hattour, Jarboui, Elhasni and Ramos-Esplá2012). On Mediterranean soft bottoms, this species has been associated with demersal assemblages currently exploited by trawling (Rosseti et al., Reference Rossetti, Sartor, Francesconi, Mori and Belcari2006). Ovigerous females have been reported from March to November (Zariquiey Álvarez, Reference Zariquiey Álvarez1968: 313 as Dorippe lanata; Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 32; Modena et al., Reference Modena, Mori and Vacchi2001; Rosseti et al., Reference Rossetti, Sartor, Francesconi, Mori and Belcari2006).

Our specimens were collected from 86–90 to 112 m, on sand with biogenic debris bottoms. Ovigerous females were captured in November.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

East Atlantic, from Portugal to South Africa (up to Natal) and Mozambique, including the Canary Islands and Mediterranean Sea (Barnard, Reference Barnard1950, Reference Barnard1955; Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981; d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999).

Further records (Modena et al., Reference Modena, Mori and Vacchi2001; Abelló et al., Reference Abelló, Carbonell and Torres2002; Biagi et al., Reference Biagi, Sartor, Ardizzone, Belcari, Belluscio and Serena2002; Pipitone & Arculeo, Reference Pipitone and Arculeo2003; Ungaro et al., Reference Ungaro, Marano, Ceriola and Martino2005; Rosseti et al., Reference Rossetti, Sartor, Francesconi, Mori and Belcari2006; Fanelli et al., Reference Fanelli, Colloca and Ardizzone2007; Henriksen, Reference Henriksen2009; El Lakhrach et al., Reference El Lakhrach, Hattour, Jarboui, Elhasni and Ramos-Esplá2012; Muñoz et al., Reference Muñoz, García-Isarch, Sobrino, Burgos, Funny and González-Porto2012) fit well within its geographic distribution.

REMARKS

Manning & Holthuis (Reference Manning and Holthuis1981) erected the genera Medorippe and Phyllodorippe in order to accommodate the Atlantic species of dorippids previously included in the genus Dorippe. Medorippe can be differentiated from Phyllodorippe by the male gonopod morphology (short, stubby, straight, without distal appendages and lobulated at the outer margin of base vs long, slender, S-shaped, with two short distal appendages and lacking a lobe in the proximal part) and by the presence of a row of spines on the dorsal margin of pereiopods 2 and 3.

Family ethusidae Guinot, Reference Guinot1977
Genus Ethusa Roux, Reference Roux1830
Ethusa rosacea A. Milne-Edwards & Bouvier, Reference Milne-Edwards and Bouvier1897
(Figure 8)

Ethusa rosacea A. Milne-Edwards & Bouvier, Reference Milne-Edwards and Bouvier1897: 298; Monod, Reference Monod1956: 88 (references); Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 38 (references).

Fig. 8. Ethusa rosacea A. Milne Edwards & Bouvier, 1897, ovigerous female CL: 11.16 mm dorsal view, MUBV17.

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MUBV17, 1022–1026 m, (1).

Ovigerous female: 11.16 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimen agrees well with the original description and the figures provided later by Milne-Edwards & Bouvier (Reference Milne-Edwards, Bouvier and Milne-Edwards1900: pls III figure 5, X figures 5–8) and by Capart (Reference Capart1951: figure 5).

BIOLOGY

Bottoms of sand, muddy sand and sandy mud (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981; d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999), with a bathymetric range of 84 m (Henriksen, Reference Henriksen2009) to 1113 m (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999). Ovigerous females have been recorded in March, April and June (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981).

Only one ovigerous female was collected in December between 1022–1026 m.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

The species is recorded in the Eastern Atlantic from scattered localities between Mauritania and Angola, including the Canary and Cape Verde Islands (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999). Henriksen (Reference Henriksen2009) reported this species from the Gulf of Guinea.

REMARKS

The poor development of the outer frontal teeth, the sparse setation of the carapace and the transversal broadness of the walking legs dactylus ensure the identification of our specimen as E. rosacea.

Ovigerous females are recorded for the first time at the end of the year, suggesting a biannual spawn strategy.

Ethusa rugulosa A. Milne-Edwards & Bouvier, Reference Milne-Edwards and Bouvier1897
(Figure 9)

Ethusa rugulosa A. Milne-Edwards & Bouvier, Reference Milne-Edwards and Bouvier1897: 297; Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 39 (references).

Fig. 9. Ethusa rugulosa A. Milne-Edwards & Bouvier, 1897, adult male dorsal view, MUBV21.

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MUBV01, 112 m, (1); MUBV02, 318–330 m, (1); MUBV10, 332–344 m, (26); MUBV20, 155 m, (1); MUBV21, 107–109 m, (1).

Males: 8.83–16.60 mm, females: 11.64–14.93 mm, ovigerous females: 11.09–12.64 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimen agrees well with the description and figures of the type provided by Milne-Edwards & Bouvier (Reference Milne-Edwards, Bouvier and Milne-Edwards1900: 24).

BIOLOGY

This species has been recorded from different soft bottoms, including sand and shells, muddy sand, shelly mud and also hard substrates (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 39; Henriksen, Reference Henriksen2009: 154). Bathymetric range between 55–60 and 275 m (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 39). Ovigerous females have been recorded in July (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 39).

Our specimens were collected from 107–109 to 332–344 m with ovigerous females in November.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

Eastern Atlantic, recorded from scattered localities: Mauritania (present work), the Cape Verde Islands, Senegal, Sierra Leona, Liberia and Angola (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981) (see Remarks). This species was also reported from the Gulf of Guinea by Henriksen (Reference Henriksen2009).

REMARKS

Our finding is the first record of this species in Mauritania, extending the northern distribution up to Cape Blanc. Also, the bathymetric range is extended from 275 m reported in the literature to 332–344 m in this work.

The presence of ovigerous females for the first time at the end of the year suggests a biannual spawn.

Superfamily goneplacoidea MacLeay, 1838
Family goneplacidae MacLeay, 1838
Genus Goneplax Leach, Reference Leach and Brewster1814
Goneplax barnardi (Capart, Reference Capart1951)
(Figure 10)

Carcinoplax barnardi Capart, Reference Capart1951: 170, figures 65 a, b.

Fig. 10. Goneplax barnardi (Capart, 1951), male CL: 20.01 mm dorsal view, MUBV09.

Goneplax barnardi: Castro, Reference Castro2007: 689, figure 27b (references).

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MU44, 606–596 m, (1); MU54, 414–451 m, (2); MU57, 430–406 m, (5); MU123, 278–362 m, (1); MU152, 381–316 m, (1); MU214, 650–588 m, (1); MU216, 422 m, (5); MUBV03, 528–538 m, (6); MUBV09, 549–555 m, (1); MUBV13, 493–517 m, (14); MUBV14, 300–281 m, (7); MUBV18, 559–574 m, (11); MUBV19, 306 m, (1); MUBV25, 499–520 m, (2).

Males: 9.73–20.01 mm, females: 12.52–15.61 mm, ovigerous females: 11.18–15.51 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree well with the description of the type and with the detailed figures provided in Monod (Reference Monod1956: 351).

BIOLOGY

Previously reported from mud and sandy mud bottoms, from 200 to 590 m (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999: 241). Ovigerous females have been recorded in March and May (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 160).

Our specimens were collected between 278–362 and 588–650 m on sand and sandy mud bottoms. Ovigerous females were captured in December.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

East Atlantic, from Western Sahara to Angola, including the Cape Verde Islands (Castro, Reference Castro2007) (see Remarks). Muñoz et al. (Reference Muñoz, García-Isarch, Sobrino, Burgos, Funny and González-Porto2012) later reported this species from Guinea-Bissau.

REMARKS

Castro (Reference Castro2007) removed this species from the former Carcinoplax to Goneplax because of its longer eye peduncles, dorsal margin of the ambulatory legs (P2–P5) meri armed with an acute distal tooth (although this character is also present in the Western Pacific Carcinoplax spinosissima Rathbun, 1914), and slender dactyli carinated on both sides. Obviously, Castro (Reference Castro2007: 690) meant Eastern Atlantic when he wrote ‘Western Atlantic along the west coast of Africa’.

This record constitutes the first for the species in Mauritanian waters and it is the first time that ovigerous females are reported at the end of the year. The known spawn period (March, May and December) suggests that the species is a biannual spawner.

Goneplax rhomboides (Linnaeus, Reference Linnaeus1758)
(Figure 11)

Cancer rhomboides Linnaeus, Reference Linnaeus1758: 626.

Fig. 11. Goneplax rhomboides (Linnaeus, 1758), male CL: 13.06 mm dorsal view, MU143.

Goneplax rhomboides: Castro, Reference Castro2007: 687, figure 27A (references).

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MU143, 322 m, (1); MU207, 88–117 m, (1); MU227, 183–181 m, (3); MUBV14, 300–281 m, (2).

Males: 9.98–13.06 mm, ovigerous female: 10.05 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree well with the descriptions and figures in Monod (Reference Monod1956: 354; as Goneplax angulata) and in Zariquiey Álvarez (Reference Zariquiey Álvarez1968: 414).

BIOLOGY

Burrowing species (Atkinson, Reference Atkinson1974; Neudecker et al., Reference Neudecker, Schiefenhövel, Kehlert and Becker2011), usually found in mud, sandy mud, muddy sand and sand bottoms; also on rocks and shells (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981; d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999; Pipitone & Arculeo, Reference Pipitone and Arculeo2003; Ateş et al., Reference Ateş, Katağan and Kocataş2006; Trenkel et al., Reference Trenkel, Le Loc'h and Rochet2007; Mutlu & Ergev, Reference Mutlu and Ergev2008; Fanelli et al., Reference Fanelli, Cartes, Badalamenti, Rumolo and Sprovieri2009; Metin et al., Reference Metin, Gökçe, Aydin and Bayramiç2009; Guillén et al., Reference Guillén, Gras, Soler and Triviño2011; Neudecker et al., Reference Neudecker, Schiefenhövel, Kehlert and Becker2011; El Lakhrach et al., Reference El Lakhrach, Hattour, Jarboui, Elhasni and Ramos-Esplá2012; Ellis et al., Reference Ellis, Martinez, Burt and Scott2013). Bathymetric range from intertidal zone (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999) to 600–999 m (Company et al., Reference Company, Maiorano, Tselepides, Politou, Plaity, Rotllant and Sardà2004; Cartes et al., Reference Cartes, Maynou, Fanelli, Papiol and Lloris2009). Ovigerous females were reported from January to March, from May to August, and in November and December (Zariquiey Álvarez, Reference Zariquiey Álvarez1968; Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981; García Raso, Reference García Raso1984, Reference García Raso1996).

Our specimens were collected between 88–117 and 322 m on sandy mud and muddy sand bottoms; and the ovigerous female was captured in December.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

East Atlantic, from the coast of SE Norway and SW Sweden, the North Sea, SW United Kingdom and Ireland, the continental European coast southwards to Western Africa, at least up to Senegal (see Remarks), including Madeira and the Canary Islands, and in the Mediterranean Sea (Castro, Reference Castro2007; Guinot & Castro, Reference Guinot and Castro2007; Berggren, Reference Berggren2008; Berggren & Stefan, Reference Berggren and Stefan2010).

Further records for this species from European waters and in the Mediterranean Sea, not included in the above-mentioned references, are Maynou & Cartes (Reference Maynou and Cartes2000), Monteiro et al. (Reference Monteiro, Araújo, Erzini and Castro2001), Biagi et al. (Reference Biagi, Sartor, Ardizzone, Belcari, Belluscio and Serena2002), Pipitone & Arculeo (Reference Pipitone and Arculeo2003), Company et al. (Reference Company, Maiorano, Tselepides, Politou, Plaity, Rotllant and Sardà2004), Ungaro et al. (Reference Ungaro, Marano, Ceriola and Martino2005); Vincent (Reference Vincent2005), Ateş et al. (Reference Ateş, Katağan and Kocataş2006), Sartor et al. (Reference Sartor, Francesconi, Rossetti and de Ranieri2006), Serrano et al. (Reference Serrano, Sánchez and García-Castrillo2006), Fanelli et al. (Reference Fanelli, Colloca and Ardizzone2007), Trenkel et al. (Reference Trenkel, Le Loc'h and Rochet2007), Mutlu & Ergev (Reference Mutlu and Ergev2008), Cartes et al. (Reference Cartes, Maynou, Fanelli, Papiol and Lloris2009), Fanelli et al. (Reference Fanelli, Cartes, Badalamenti, Rumolo and Sprovieri2009), Metin et al. (Reference Metin, Gökçe, Aydin and Bayramiç2009), Neudecker et al. (Reference Neudecker, Schiefenhövel, Kehlert and Becker2011), Serrano et al. (Reference Serrano, Sánchez, Punzón, Velasco and Olaso2011), El Lakhrach et al. (Reference El Lakhrach, Hattour, Jarboui, Elhasni and Ramos-Esplá2012) and Ellis et al. (Reference Ellis, Martinez, Burt and Scott2013).

REMARKS

Goneplax rhomboides has long been described as a species with a wide geographic distribution in East Atlantic waters, from the North Atlantic to South Africa (Barnard, Reference Barnard1950; Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981; d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999). However, Guinot & Castro (Reference Guinot and Castro2007) described the new species, Goneplax clevai, from the South Atlantic and western limits of the Indo-West Pacific region, including in their new species some specimens reported from the Ivory Coast to South Africa and previously identified as G. rhomboides. Guinot & Castro (Reference Guinot and Castro2007: 25) accept as valid the material from Senegal mentioned by Monod (Reference Monod1956) for G. rhomboides. Consequently, the southern distribution limit of G. rhomboides will remain unclear southwards from Senegal until all the recorded specimens from the West African coasts can be properly checked.

Superfamily leucosioidea Samouelle, Reference Samouelle1819
Family leucosiidae Samouelle, Reference Samouelle1819
Genus Ebalia Leach, Reference Leach1817
Ebalia nux Norman in A. Milne-Edwards, Reference Milne-Edwards1883
(Figure 12)

Ebalia nux A. Milne-Edwards, Reference Milne-Edwards1883: pl. 5; Holthuis & Manning, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 61 (references)

Fig. 12. Ebalia nux Norman in A. Milne-Edwards, 1883, male CL: 7.02 mm dorsal view, MUBV10.

.

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MU87, 271–305 m, (1); MUBV10, 332–344 m, (3).

Males: 7.02–7.20 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree well with those figured by Milne-Edwards & Bouvier (Reference Milne-Edwards, Bouvier and Milne-Edwards1900: plates III, figure 7, XIII: figures 1–5), and with the descriptions provided by Zariquiey Álvarez (Reference Zariquiey Álvarez1968: 328), and by González Gurriarán & Méndez (Reference González-Gurriarán, Méndez, Castro-Sada and Coruña1986: 71).

BIOLOGY

This species has been recorded on shell, sand, sand and rocks, sand with calcareous algae, mud and sandy mud bottoms (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999; Ateş et al., Reference Ateş, Katağan and Kocataş2006); it has been also reported living on the sea pen, Pteroeides spinosum (Ellis, 1764), in the Mediterranean Sea (Porporato et al., Reference Porporato, de Domenico, Mangano, Rinelli and Spanò2012). Depths records vary between 80 and 2983 m but usually from 150 to 500 m (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999). Ovigerous females have been recorded in March (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981) and May–June (García Raso, Reference García Raso1996).

Our specimens, all males, were collected between 271–305 and 332–344 m.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

Eastern Atlantic, from the Shetland Islands and Norway to Mauritania, including the Azores, Canary and Cape Verde Islands; and Mediterranean Sea (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999).

Later records for this species (Abelló et al., Reference Abelló, Carbonell and Torres2002; Ateş et al., Reference Ateş, Katağan and Kocataş2006; Porporato et al., Reference Porporato, de Domenico, Mangano, Rinelli and Spanò2012) are all from the Mediterranean, with the exception of a report by Cartes et al. (Reference Cartes, Serrano, Velasco, Parra and Sánchez2007) from Le Danois Bank (Cantabrian Sea).

Genus Pseudomyra Capart, Reference Capart1951
Pseudomyra mbizi Capart, Reference Capart1951
(Figure 13)

Pseudomyra mbizi Capart, Reference Capart1951: 49, figure 14, pl. II figure 24; Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 66 (references).

Fig. 13. Pseudomyra mbizi Capart, 1951, adult dorsal view, MUBV01.

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MUBV01, 112 m, (9); MUBV15, 148–135 m, (93).

Males: 16.54–20.31 mm, female: 15.96–17.45 mm, ovigerous females: 15.45–17.63 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree well with the original description and figures.

BIOLOGY

The species has been collected on a variety of bottoms, such as mud, sandy mud with shells, mud with foraminifera, muddy sand, broken shells, and also on coral and rocks. Bathymetric range between 12–15 and 300 m, although usually recorded from 50 to 100 m (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981). Ovigerous females have been recorded from March to August, October and December (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981).

Our specimens were captured in depths between 112 and 135–148 m. The ovigerous females were caught in December.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

West Africa from Mauritania (present work) to Angola (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981) (see Remarks). Henriksen (Reference Henriksen2009) reports this species from the Gulf of Guinea.

REMARKS

This is the first record of this species from Mauritanian waters, which extends its north distribution up to the Banc d'Arguin.

Superfamily majoidea Samouelle, Reference Samouelle1819
Family epialtidae MacLeay, 1838
Genus Pisa Leach, Reference Leach and Brewster1814
Pisa armata (Latreille, Reference Latreille1803)
(Figure 14)

Maja armata Latreille, Reference Latreille1803: 98

Fig. 14. Pisa armata (Latreille, 1803), female CL: 22.12 mm dorsal view, MU139.

.

Pisa armata: Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 318 (references).

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MU120, 109–105 m, (1); MU131, 102–104 m, (2); MU136, 103–112 m, (1); MU139, 96–97 m, (2); MU147, 134–139 m, (1); MU154, 92–102 m, (2); MU211, 92–109 m, (1); MU261, 111–146 m, (1); MUBV15, 148–135 m (1).

Males: 17.74–22.14 mm, females: 21.08–22.12 mm, ovigerous females: 22.27–24.67 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree well with the descriptions and figures provided by Capart (Reference Capart1951: 90) and by González-Gurriarán & Méndez (Reference González-Gurriarán, Méndez, Castro-Sada and Coruña1986: 183).

BIOLOGY

This species has been recorded from rocky bottoms with gorgonians and corals, and also from sandy mud, mud, sand and shells bottoms (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981; d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999; García Raso & Manjón-Cabeza, Reference García Raso and Manjón-Cabeza2002; Pipitone & Arculeo, Reference Pipitone and Arculeo2003; Ateş et al., Reference Ateş, Katağan and Kocataş2006). Pipitone & Arculeo (Reference Pipitone and Arculeo2003) recorded the species on bottoms with Posidonia meadows, although they showed no correlation with the meadow structure (Sánchez-Jerez et al., Reference Sánchez-Jerez, Barberá-Cebrián and Ramos-Esplá2000). Bathymetric range extends from 3–10 m (Pipitone & Arculeo, Reference Pipitone and Arculeo2003) to 162 m (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999). Ovigerous females were recorded from March to May, from July to August and from November to December (Zariquiey Álvarez, Reference Zariquiey Álvarez1968; Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981; García Raso, Reference García Raso1984).

Our specimens, often with sponges, ascidians and bryozoans over the carapace, were captured between 96–97 and 135–148 m on shell debris, sand and sandy mud bottoms. Ovigerous females were collected in December.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

East Atlantic from Southern North Sea and SW British Isles to Angola, including the Azores, Canary and Cape Verde Islands; and Mediterranean Basin (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999).

Later records for this species (Sánchez-Jerez et al., Reference Sánchez-Jerez, Barberá-Cebrián and Ramos-Esplá2000; Abelló et al., Reference Abelló, Carbonell and Torres2002; García Raso & Manjón-Cabeza, Reference García Raso and Manjón-Cabeza2002; Pipitone & Arculeo, Reference Pipitone and Arculeo2003; Ateş et al., Reference Ateş, Katağan and Kocataş2006) fit well within its distribution.

REMARKS

Ng et al. (Reference Ng, Guinot and Davie2008) reviewed the nomenclatural and taxonomic problems within brachyurans, and rearranged the former family Pisididae as a subfamily into Epialtidae.

Family inachidae MacLeay, 1838
Inachus Weber, Reference Weber1795
Inachus aguiarii de Brito Capello, Reference de Brito Capello1876
(Figure 15A, B)
Inachus aguiarii de Brito Capello, Reference de Brito Capello1876: 265, pl. 2 figures 1–3

Fig. 15. Inachus aguiarii Brito Capello, 1876, ovigerous female CL: 11.36 mm, MU277: (A) general dorsal view; (B) ventral view, detail of sternal callosities.

Inachus aguiarii: Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 283 (references).

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MU120, 109–105 m, (4); MU129, 95–93 m, (1); MU131, 102–104 m, (1); MU226, 109–107 m, (1); MU277, 112–110 m, (1).

Males: 9.35–11.61 mm, ovigerous females: 10.35–11.36 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree with those described in Zariquiey Álvarez (Reference Zariquiey Álvarez1948: 301 as Inachus thoracicus ssp. aguiarii).

BIOLOGY

Previously recorded from hard bottoms with sponges and kelp; also from soft bottoms of sandy mud often mixed with shell fragments, sand or sand with calcareous algae. Recorded at depths from 20 to 100 m (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999). Ovigerous females recorded in February, March and August (Zariquiey Álvarez, Reference Zariquiey Álvarez1968; García Raso, Reference García Raso1989).

Our specimens were collected from 93–95 to 110–112 m on sand, coarse sand, gravel and sandy mud bottoms. Ovigerous females were captured in November and December.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

East Atlantic from Portugal to Guinea including the Desertas and Canary Islands (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999); in the Mediterranean Sea, the species was reported only in the Alboran and Aegean Seas (Guerao & Abelló, Reference Guerao and Abelló2007).

REMARKS

Bathymetric range is slightly increasing from that reported in the literature.

Our records of ovigerous females in November and December suggests that this species spawns all year round.

Inachus angolensis Capart, Reference Capart1951
(Figure 16)

Inachus angolensis Capart, Reference Capart1951: 72, figure 72, pl. I figure 7, pl. II figure 10; Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 283 (references)

Fig. 16. Inachus angolensis Capart, 1951, adult dorsal view, MUBV01.

.

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MU88, 94–120 m, (1); MU130, 252–362 m, (1); MU133, 87 m, (1); MU137, 81–84 m, (3); MU161, 89–92 m, (1); MU168, 87–92 m, (1); MU174, 85–84 m, (4); MU205, 89–93 m, (1); MU210, 86–90 m, (9); MU212, 163–200 m, (1); MU251, 107 m, (1); MU260, 101–120 m, (1); MU291, 106–137 m, (1); MUBV01, 112 m, (12); MUBV02, 318–330 m, (1); MUBV14, 300–281 m, (1); MUBV15, 148–135 m, (11); MUBV21, 107–109 m, (6).

Males: 10.04–15.11 mm, females: 8.36–13.67 mm, ovigerous females: 11.56–15.35 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree well with the original description and also with the notes and the figures provided by Monod (Reference Monod1956: 524, figures 712 and 713).

BIOLOGY

This species has been recorded from mud, sandy mud and sandy bottoms (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981), at depths from 0–81 m (Henriksen, Reference Henriksen2009) up to at least 350 m (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981). Ovigerous females were recorded from February to June, September and October (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981).

Our specimens were captured between 81–84 and 252–362 m on coarse sand, sandy mud with gravel or shell fragments. Ovigerous females were collected in November and December.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

West Africa from Western Sahara (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981) to Namibia (Macpherson, Reference Macpherson1991). Henriksen (Reference Henriksen2009) reports this species from the Gulf of Guinea.

REMARKS

Our finding of ovigerous females in November and December suggests that this species spawns throughout the year.

Inachus grallator Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981
(Figure 17A, B)

Inachus grallator Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 287, figures 73, 74.

Fig. 17. Inachus grallator Manning & Holthuis, 1981, male CL: 6.91 mm, MUBV10, in ethanol: (A) general dorsal view; (B) dorsal carapace detail. Scale bars: (A) 1 cm; (B) 1 mm.

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MUBV10, 332–344 m, (1); MUBV14, 300–281 m, (1).

Males: 6.91 and 7.72 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree well with the original description.

BIOLOGY

Reported from green mud, brown sandy mud, muddy sand and green muddy sand, at depths between 100 and 250–300 m (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981) and down to 325 m (Fransen, Reference Fransen1991). Ovigerous females have been recorded in January and November (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981).

Only two males were collected during the MAURIT surveys, at 281–300 and 332–344 m depth.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

West Africa in Mauritania (Fransen, Reference Fransen1991 in part; present work) and from Nigeria to Namibia (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981; Macpherson, Reference Macpherson1991) (see Remarks).

REMARKS

Although the possibility of finding this species up to the Western Sahara (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981) or the Canary Islands (González Pérez & Quiles Lucas, Reference González Pérez, Quiles Lucas, Moro, Martín, Garrido and Izquierdo2003) has been mentioned in the literature, to date no records further north than Nigeria – excepting those in Fransen (Reference Fransen1991) – have been reported from Mauritania and the Canary Islands. The fact that Manning & Holthuis (Reference Manning and Holthuis1981) described I. grallator as a ‘deep-water species, known to occur at depths between 100 and 250–300 m’ suggests that further revision is required for Fransen's (Reference Fransen1991) records for this species at less than 100 m depth. Our record confirms the presence of this species in Mauritanian waters and slightly increases the previously reported bathymetric range.

This species closely resembles another Inachus species, I. dorsettensis. However, after analysing some specimens of I. dorsettensis from Galicia (NW Spain), we conclude that the slenderness of the pereiopods and the shape of the dactyli of the fifth pereiopods ensure the identification of the Mauritanian material as I. grallator.

Inachus leptochirus Leach, Reference Leach1817
(Figure 18A–C)

Inachus leptochirus Leach, Reference Leach1817, in Leach Reference Leach1815–1875: 1 p, pl. XXII.b figures 1, 2, 3; Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 291 (references)

Fig. 18. Inachus leptochirus Leach, 1817, MUBV10: (A) adult general view; (B) male CL: 12.42 mm, in alcohol, carapace dorsal view; (C) same ventral view. Scale bars: B, C, 1 mm.

.

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MU200, 352–334 m, (4); MU204, 155–145 m, (1); MUBV10, 332–344 m, (29).

Males: 9.28–19.21 mm, female: 13.93–19.33 mm, ovigerous females: 10.56–18.37 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree well with notes and figures in Bouvier (Reference Bouvier1940: 356) and Zariquiey Álvarez (Reference Zariquiey Álvarez1968: 472).

BIOLOGY

Bottoms of gravel, sand, mud and maerl beds, at depths between 27 m (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999) and 500–650 m (Serrano et al., Reference Serrano, Sánchez, Punzón, Velasco and Olaso2011). Ovigerous females have been observed in February, May and November (Zariquiey Álvarez, Reference Zariquiey Álvarez1968).

Our specimens were captured between 145–155 and 334–352 m on coarse sand and muddy sand bottoms, mixed with shell debris. Ovigerous females were collected in November.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

East Atlantic, from the Faroe Islands to Mauritania, including the Azores; and Mediterranean Sea (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999). This species was recently reported in the N Iberian Peninsula by Serrano et al. (Reference Serrano, Sánchez, Punzón, Velasco and Olaso2011).

Inachus nanus Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981
(Figure 19)

Inachus nanus Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 291, figure 75a–e.

Fig. 19. Inachus nanus Manning & Holthuis, 1981, ovigerous female CL: 6.72 mm, MU166, in ethanol, dorsal view. Scale bar 1 mm.

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MU166, 87–85 m, (2); MU207, 88–117 m, (1); MU212, 163–200 m, (1); MU261, 111–146 m, (1).

Male: 9.50 mm, ovigerous female: 6.72 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree well with the original description.

BIOLOGY

Previously reported on broken shells, bryozoans, gravel, mud with foraminifera and muddy sand bottoms. Depth records between 29 and 118 m (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999: 198). Ovigerous females have been collected in February, May to July, September and October (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981).

Our specimens were found between 85–87 and 163–200 m on muddy sand, coarse muddy sand and shell debris bottoms. Ovigerous females were captured in December.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

West Africa from Mauritania to Cameroon, including the Canary Islands (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999).

REMARKS

This record slightly increases the bathymetric range of this species down to 163–200 m; the presence of ovigerous females in December suggests that this species spawns throughout the year.

Genus Macropodia Leach, Reference Leach and Brewster1814
Macropodia gilsoni (Capart, Reference Capart1951)
(Figure 20A, B)

Achaeopsis gilsoni Capart Reference Capart1951: 65, pl. I figure 4, 10, pl. II figure 3.

Fig. 20. Macropodia gilsoni (Capart, 1951), ovigerous female CL: 14.35 mm, MUBV21: (A) general dorsal view; (B) dorsal carapace detail.

Macropodia gilsoni: Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 297 (references).

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MU119, 82–80 m, (2); MU120, 109–105 m, (3); MU131, 102–104 m, (1); MU138, 123–130 m, (2); MU139, 96–97 m, (1); MU149, 93–146 m, (1); MU151, 110–134 m, (1); MU156, 107–102 m, (1); MU161, 89–92 m, (2) MU166, 87–85 m, (2) MU168, 87–92 m, (2) MU170, 102–92 m, (13); MU210, 86–90 m, (4); MU217, 111–113 m, (1); MU223, 116–117 m, (2); MU233, 165–189 m, (1); MU235, 123 m, (1); MUBV15, 148–135 m, (10); MUBV21, 107–109 m, (1).

Males: 4.71–9.36 mm, females: 3.21–5.09 mm, ovigerous females: 11.05–4.35 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree well with the description of the type and also with the figures provided by Monod (Reference Monod1956: 555).

BIOLOGY

Species recorded on various kinds of muddy bottoms, including bottoms with shells and bryozoans or foliate foraminifera (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981), at depths from 37 m (Holthuis & Manning, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981) up to 264 m (Henriksen, Reference Henriksen2009, see Remarks). Ovigerous females recorded throughout the year, except in July (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 297).

Our specimens were captured between 80–82 and 165–189 m on sandy mud, sand and muddy sand bottoms usually mixed with shell debris. Some specimens carried the hydrozoan Obelia bidentata Clark, 1875, on the carapace and legs. Ovigerous females were collected in November and December.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

West Africa from Mauritania (present work) to Angola (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981) (see Remarks). Henriksen (Reference Henriksen2009) reported this species off Nigeria, Cameroon and Congo.

REMARKS

Our record is the first report of this species in Mauritania, extending its geographic distribution northwards from Senegal to the Banc d'Arguin.

The record for this species in Henriksen (Reference Henriksen2009) from Cameroon at station 938, Long.: 9.150 Lat.: 3.900, at 0 m depth, must be considered as an error (0 m, null sampling?).

Macropodia hesperiae Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981
(Figure 21)

Macropodia hesperiae Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 298, figure 77a–e.

Fig. 21. Macropodia hesperiae Manning & Holthuis, 1981, male CL: 6.48 mm, MU119, in ethanol, dorsal view. Scale bar 1 mm.

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MU119, 82–80 m, (1); MU129, 95–93 m, (1); MU154, 92–102 m, (2).

Male: 6.48 mm, female: 6.52 mm, ovigerous female: 5.82 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree well with the original description.

BIOLOGY

Previously recorded on bottoms of mud, sand and compacted sand, at depths varying from 46–49 to 82–97 m. Ovigerous females have been reported in May (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981).

Our specimens were captured between 80–82 and 92–102 m on compact coarse sand bottoms.

Some specimens carried the hydrozoan species Nemertesia sp. and some colonies of the branched bryozoan species Synnotum aegyptiacum (Audouin, 1826) on their carapaces. The only ovigerous female was collected in December.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

West Africa from Mauritania (present work) to Nigeria (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981).

REMARKS

González Pérez (Reference González Pérez1995) mentioned one specimen from the Canary Islands identified as Macropodia aff. hesperiae and collected at 821 m. However, since all the previous records of this species, including those in this study, were found in depths between 46–49 and 92–102 m, we don't consider as valid the record from Canary Islands until further confirmation of the species identification.

Our finding extends the distribution area of this species northwards, from Senegal up to Cape Timiris.

The record of ovigerous females in December indicates that this species spawns at least biannually.

Macropodia longipes (A. Milne-Edwards & Bouvier, Reference Milne-Edwards and Bouvier1899)
(Figure 22)

Stenorhynchus longipes A. Milne-Edwards & Bouvier, Reference Milne-Edwards and Bouvier1899: 48

Fig. 22. Macropodia longipes (A. Milne-Edwards and Bouvier, 1899), male CL: 7.45 mm MU277, dorsal view. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Macropodia longipes: Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 300 (references).

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MU277, 112–110 m, (1).

Male: 7.45 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimen agrees well with descriptions provided in Forest & Zariquiey Álvarez (Reference Forest and Zariquiey Álvarez1964: 226) and González-Gurriarán & Méndez (Reference González-Gurriarán, Méndez, Castro-Sada and Coruña1986: 169).

BIOLOGY

Species reported in the literature from bottoms of sand and broken shells (Anadon, Reference Anadon1981), sand, silt, gravel and coarse sands (Serrano et al., Reference Serrano, Sánchez, Punzón, Velasco and Olaso2011), and in seagrasses (Ateş et al., Reference Ateş, Katağan and Kocataş2006). Depth records from 9 m (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999) to 1249 m (Cartes et al., Reference Cartes, Maynou, Moranta, Massuti, Lloris and Morales-Nin2004). Ovigerous females recorded in February, March, August and September (Zariquiey Álvarez, Reference Zariquiey Álvarez1968; Pipitone & Tumbiolo, Reference Pipitone and Tumbiolo1993: 362).

The only specimen examined here was a male, collected between 110 and 112 m on a muddy sand bottom.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

East Atlantic, from the Gulf of Gascogne to Mauritania, including the Cape Verde Islands; and Mediterranean Sea (Forest, Reference Forest1978 as Macropodia tenuirostris longipes).

Further records for this species all refer to the Mediterranean Sea (Modena et al., Reference Modena, Mori and Vacchi2001; Abelló et al., Reference Abelló, Carbonell and Torres2002; Biagi et al., Reference Biagi, Sartor, Ardizzone, Belcari, Belluscio and Serena2002; Cartes et al., Reference Cartes, Maynou, Moranta, Massuti, Lloris and Morales-Nin2004; Colloca et al., Reference Colloca, Carpentieri, Balestri and Ardizzone2004; Politou et al., Reference Politou, Maiorano, D'Onghia and Mytilineou2005; Ungaro et al., Reference Ungaro, Marano, Ceriola and Martino2005; Ateş et al., Reference Ateş, Katağan and Kocataş2006; Fanelli et al., Reference Fanelli, Colloca and Ardizzone2007; García-Muñoz et al., Reference García-Muñoz, Manjón-Cabeza and García-Raso2008; Serrano et al., Reference Serrano, Sánchez, Punzón, Velasco and Olaso2011).

REMARKS

Since Forest (Reference Forest1978) declared Macropodia tenuirostris longipes as the deepest form of M. tenuirostris tenuirostris, some authors subsequently synonymized both subspecies under the name Macropodia tenuirostris (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999; Pipitone & Arculeo, Reference Pipitone and Arculeo2003). However, we follow Ng et al. (Reference Ng, Guinot and Davie2008), who kept them as two different species, only including here references that refer to M. longipes as a separate species or subspecies.

Although the rostrum of our specimen is a little damaged, the slightly curved (not arcuated) P4, P5 dactylus, the basal article of antenna with strong spines ventrally, the presence of a nuchal spine and the absence of spines on the supraorbital margin ensure its identification as M. longipes.

Macropodia macrocheles (A. Milne-Edwards & Bouvier, Reference Milne-Edwards and Bouvier1898)
(Figure 23A–C)

Stenorhynchus macrocheles A. Milne-Edwards & Bouvier, Reference Milne-Edwards and Bouvier1898: 153

Fig. 23. Macropodia macrocheles (A. Milne-Edwards & Bouvier, 1898): (A) male CL: 8.86 mm dorsal view, MU184; (B) ovigerous female CL: 5.17 mm, MU141, in ethanol, dorsal view; (C) same, epistome detail. Scale bars B, C: 1 mm.

Macropodia macrocheles: Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 301 (references)

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MU100, 236–238 m, (3); MU105, 343–346 m, (1); MU141, 280–277 m, (11); MU149, 93–146 m, (1); MU155, 210–257 m, (3); MU157, 278–454 m, (3); MU159, 224–229 m, (7); MU173, 314–540 m, (1); MU179, 303–304 m, (1); MU184, 213–202 m, (2); MU233, 165–189 m, (1); MU280, 230–239 m, (2); MUBV22, 300 m, (1).

Males: 4.41–9.75 mm, ovigerous females: 5.17–6.45 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree well with the descriptions and figures in Milne-Edwards & Bouvier (Reference Milne-Edwards, Bouvier and Milne-Edwards1900: 159) and Capart (Reference Capart1951: 77).

BIOLOGY

Collected on mud, sand and muddy sand bottoms, at depths between 96 and 300 m (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981). Ovigerous females have been recorded in January, February, May, June and December (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981).

Our specimens were captured in depths between 93–143 and 314–540 m on muddy sand and sandy mud bottoms. Some specimens carried hydroid colonies of Clytia gracilis (Sars, 1850), Clytia paulensis (Vanhöffen, 1910), Antennella secundaria (Gmelin, 1791) and a branched unidentified bryozoan species of the genus Bugula Oken, 1815, on their carapaces. Ovigerous females were collected in December.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

West Africa, from Mauritania (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981) to Namibia (Macpherson, Reference Macpherson1991).

REMARKS

Our findings slightly extend the bathymetric range previously reported in the literature.

Family majidae Samouelle, Reference Samouelle1819
Genus Eurynome Leach, Reference Leach and Brewster1814
Eurynome aspera (Pennant, Reference Pennant1777)
(Figure 24)

Cancer Asper Pennant, Reference Pennant1777: 7, pl IX.A, figure 20

Fig. 24. Eurynome aspera (Pennant, 1777), male CL: 10.35 mm dorsal view, MU209.

.

Eurynome aspera: Griffin, Reference Griffin1974; Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 311 (references).

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MU183, 138–177 m, (1), MU209, 115–150 m, (1).

Males: 10.35–11.87 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree with the description and figures provided by Zariquiey Álvarez (Reference Zariquiey Álvarez1968: 462) and González-Gurriarán & Méndez (Reference González-Gurriarán, Méndez, Castro-Sada and Coruña1986: 178).

BIOLOGY

Mainly reported on firm substrates of relatively large particles, bottoms of shelly sand, calcareous algae, muddy shells and gravel, maerl beds and on rock (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981; Ballesteros, Reference Ballesteros2006) and in Posidonia meadows (Pipitone & Arculeo, Reference Pipitone and Arculeo2003; Ateş et al., Reference Ateş, Katağan and Kocataş2006). Bathymetric range between 10 and 1216 m (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999: 188). Ovigerous females reported in April (Zariquiey Álvarez, Reference Zariquiey Álvarez1968).

Specimens examined were two males collected at 115–150 and 138–177 m.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

East Atlantic, from Norway to Angola, including the Azores, Desertas, Canary and Cape Verde Islands; Mediterranean Sea; West Indian Ocean from False Bay, South Africa, to Durban (Griffin, Reference Griffin1974; d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999).

Later records for this species (Abelló et al., Reference Abelló, Carbonell and Torres2002; García Raso & Manjón-Cabeza, Reference García Raso and Manjón-Cabeza2002; Pipitone & Arculeo, Reference Pipitone and Arculeo2003; Ateş et al., Reference Ateş, Katağan and Kocataş2006; Serrano et al., Reference Serrano, Sánchez and García-Castrillo2006; Cartes et al., Reference Cartes, Serrano, Velasco, Parra and Sánchez2007; García-Muñoz et al., Reference García-Muñoz, Manjón-Cabeza and García-Raso2008; Ellis et al., Reference Ellis, Martinez, Burt and Scott2013) fit well within its geographic distribution.

Superfamily parthenopoidea MacLeay, 1838
Family parthenopidae MacLeay, 1838
Genus Distolambrus Tan & Ng, Reference Tan and Ng2007
Distolambrus maltzami (Miers, Reference Miers1881)
(Figure 25)

Heterocrypta Maltzami Miers, Reference Miers1881: 209, pl. 13: figure 1

Fig. 25. Distolambrus maltzami (Miers, 1881), ovigerous female CL: 8.08 mm, MUBV21, in ethanol, dorsal view. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Heterocrypta maltzami: Manning & Holthuis Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 322 (references)

Distolambrus maltzami: Tan & Ng, Reference Tan and Ng2007: 103, figure 5; Henriksen, Reference Henriksen2009: 80, figure 40

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MUBV21, 107–109 m, (2).

Ovigerous female: 8.08 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimen agrees well with the description provided by Milne-Edwards & Bouvier (Reference Milne-Edwards, Bouvier and Milne-Edwards1900: 121, as Heterocrypta Maltzani and Heterocrypta Maltzani var. Marioni).

BIOLOGY

Previously reported from bottoms of shell debris, shelly sand, sand, muddy sand, mud, calcareous algae and rock (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981, as Heterocrypta maltzami; d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999, as Heterocrypta maltzami marionis). Bathymetric range oscillates between 22 and 550 m (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999, as Heterocrypta maltzami marionis), but all previous West African records are from less than 100 m depth (0–70 m) (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981; as Heterocrypta maltzami).

On the West African coast, ovigerous females have been found throughout the year (Zariquiey Álvarez, Reference Zariquiey Álvarez1968; as Heterocrypta maltzami).

Only one ovigerous female was collected in December during the MAURIT surveys, between 107 and 109 m.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

Eastern Atlantic Ocean from the Bay of Biscay to Angola, including the Azores and Cape Verde Islands (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981), as well as in the Mediterranean Sea (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999).

Later records (Pipitone & Arculeo, Reference Pipitone and Arculeo2003; Serrano et al., Reference Serrano, Sánchez and García-Castrillo2006; Henriksen, Reference Henriksen2009; Massi et al., Reference Massi, Micalizzi, Giusto and Pipitone2010) fit well within its geographic distribution.

REMARKS

In their systematic revision of the subfamily Parthenopinae, Tan & Ng (Reference Tan and Ng2007) relocated the former Heterocrypta maltzami in their new genus Distolambrus. Both genera can be easily differentiated by the presence of a V-shaped ridge on the gastric region of Distolambrus (U-shaped in Heterocrypta); the branchial ridge not continuous with the gastric ridge (continuous in Heterocrypta); male with fused thoracic sternites without a transverse groove (with a broad transverse groove in Heterocrypta); third maxilliped merus subtriangular (subquadrate in Heterocrypta); and the posterior margin not produced beyond the base of the abdomen (produced in Heterocrypta).

Genus Solenolambrus Stimpson, Reference Stimpson1871
Solenolambrus noordendei (Capart, Reference Capart1951)
(Figure 26)

Heterocrypta noordendei Capart, Reference Capart1951: 108, figure 37, pl. II figure 15.

Fig. 26. Solenolambrus noordendei (Capart, 1951), ovigerous female CL: 9.04 mm dorsal view, MU233.

Solenolambrus noordendei: Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 336 (references); Tan, Reference Tan2004: 500, figures 137G, H; 140B (references).

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MU86, 91–103 m, (1); MU170, 102–92 m, (13); MU171, 105–100 m, (19); MU183, 138–177 m, (1); MU210, 86–90 m, (1); MU212, 163–200 m, (2); MU233, 165–189 m, (1); MUBV01, 112 m, (63); MUBV02, 318–330 m, (2); MUBV10, 332–344 m, (6); MUBV15, 148–135 m, (11); MUBV21, 107–109 m, (18).

Males: 8.26–13.61 mm, ovigerous females: 6.71–10.81 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree well with the original description.

BIOLOGY

Species found on a variety of bottoms such as mud, muddy sand, mud with branched foraminifera, sandy mud, shelly mud, broken shells, coral or rock, at depths between 64 and 215 m. Ovigerous females have been previously recorded in February, March, May, July and November (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981).

Our specimens were captured in depths from 86–90 to 332–344 m, in bottoms of coarse sand with mud and shell debris, muddy sand and sandy mud. Ovigerous females were collected in November and December.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

West Africa from Mauritania (present work) to Angola (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981).

REMARKS

Our records extend northwards the geographic distribution, from Senegal to Cape Blanc. They also broaden the bathymetric range of the species down to 322–344 m. The presence of ovigerous females also in December suggests that this species spawns throughout the year.

Genus Spinolambrus Tan & Ng, Reference Tan and Ng2007
Spinolambrus notialis (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981)
(Figure 27)

Parthenope notialis Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 331, figures 85, 86a–b.

Fig. 27. Spinolambrus notialis (Manning & Holthuis, 1981), ovigerous female CL: 10.08 mm dorsal view, MU131.

Spinolambrus notialis: Tan, Reference Tan2004: 524, figures 144A–B, 146B; Tan & Low, Reference Tan and Low2014: 96, figure 2B.

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MU131, 102–104 m, (1); MU186, 174 m, (1); MUBV21, 107–109 m, (1).

Female: 7.21 mm, ovigerous female: 10.08 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree well with the original description.

BIOLOGY

Species recorded on bottoms of mud, sandy mud or sand, mostly mixed with broken shells, bryozoans, branched or foliate foraminifera, calcareous algae, corals and rocks. Bathymetric range from 18 to 162 m (Manning & Holthuis Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 335 as Parthenope notialis). Ovigerous females have been reported in February, March, May, June, July, September and November (Zariquiey Álvarez, Reference Zariquiey Álvarez1968: 441 as Parthenope macrochelos; Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 335 as Parthenope notialis).

Our specimens were captured from 102–104 to 174 m, on coarse sand and muddy sand bottoms. Ovigerous females were collected in December.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

West Africa from Mauritania (present work, see Remarks) to Angola (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 335 as Parthenope notialis). Muñoz et al. (Reference Muñoz, García-Isarch, Sobrino, Burgos, Funny and González-Porto2012) reported this species from Guinea-Bissau.

REMARKS

This species was relocated by Tan & Ng (Reference Tan and Ng2007) in their new genus Spinolambrus erected to include some species of the subfamily Parthenopinae previously placed within the genera Lambrus and Parthenope from both the Atlantic and the Eastern Pacific.

Manning & Holthuis (Reference Manning and Holthuis1981) established the distribution range of this species at least from Senegal to Angola, inasmuch as the authors pointed out that most of the records of S. macrochelos (as P. macrochelos) from tropical West Africa were based on S. notialis. In consequence, they described the records of Maurin (Reference Maurin1968; as Lambrus macrocheles) from the Western Sahara and Mauritanian waters as dubious, and a further taxonomic revision would assign them to S. notialis or S. macrochelos. The same occurs with the citation in Fransen (Reference Fransen1991), although in this case Fransen referred to the specimens as ‘Parthenope notialis/miersi’ [Parthenope miersii was synonymized with S. macrochelos (Tan, Reference Tan2004)].

The southernmost distribution of S. macrochelos was confirmed by Tan & Low (Reference Tan and Low2014) in Salé (Morocco) and the authors suggest that the distributions of S. macrochelos and S. notialis may overlap in North-west Africa.

Our record off Banc d'Arguin confirms the presence of this species in Mauritanian waters and slightly extends its bathymetric distribution.

The presence of ovigerous females in December confirms that this species spawns all the year round.

Superfamily portunoidea Rafinesque, 1815
Family carcinidae MacLeay, 1838
Genus Liocarcinus Stimpson, Reference Stimpson1871
Liocarcinus corrugatus (Pennant, Reference Pennant1777)
(Figure 28A–C)

Cancer corrugatus Pennat, Reference Pennant1777: 5, pl. V figure 9.

Fig. 28. Liocarcinus corrugatus (Pennant, 1777), male CL: 13.07 mm, MUBV08: (A) dorsal view; (B) same, in ethanol; (C) dorsal carapace, in alcohol. Scale bars: B, 1 cm; C, 1 mm.

Liocarcinus corrugatus: Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 84 (references).

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MUBV08, 174–168 m, (2).

Male: 13.07 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimen agrees well with those described by Zariquiey Álvarez (Reference Zariquiey Álvarez1968) and González-Gurriarán & Méndez (Reference González-Gurriarán, Méndez, Castro-Sada and Coruña1986).

BIOLOGY

Mainly reported on coarse soft bottoms such as gravel, coarse sand, sandy mud, muddy sand and maerl beds (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999; as Polybius (Necora) corrugatus; El Lakhrach et al., Reference El Lakhrach, Hattour, Jarboui, Elhasni and Ramos-Esplá2012), but also recorded on rocks and in Posidonia oceanica (Linnaeus) Delile, 1813 meadows (Pipitone & Arculeo, Reference Pipitone and Arculeo2003; as Polybius corrugatus; Pipitone & Vaccaro, Reference Pipitone, Vaccaro, Pessani, Tirelli and Froglia2011). Depth records from 5–10 m (Pipitone & Arculeo, Reference Pipitone and Arculeo2003; as Polybius corrugatus) to 147 m (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999; as Polybius (Necora) corrugatus). Ovigerous females reported from November to January, March, May, June and July (Zariquiey Álvarez, Reference Zariquiey Álvarez1968; as Macropipus corrugatus; García Raso, Reference García Raso1984).

Only one male was captured during the MAURIT surveys, between 168 and 174 m.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

East Atlantic, from the Orkney Islands to Angola, including the Azores, Madeira, Canary and Cape Verde Islands; and Mediterranean Basin (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999: 219) (see Remarks).

Further records in the literature (Abelló et al., Reference Abelló, Carbonell and Torres2002; García Raso & Manjón-Cabeza, Reference García Raso and Manjón-Cabeza2002; Pipitone & Arculeo, Reference Pipitone and Arculeo2003; as Polybius corrugatus; Ateş et al., Reference Ateş, Katağan and Kocataş2006; García-Muñoz et al., Reference García-Muñoz, Manjón-Cabeza and García-Raso2008; Pipitone & Vaccaro, Reference Pipitone, Vaccaro, Pessani, Tirelli and Froglia2011; El Lakhrach et al., Reference El Lakhrach, Hattour, Jarboui, Elhasni and Ramos-Esplá2012; Muñoz et al., Reference Muñoz, García-Isarch, Sobrino, Burgos, Funny and González-Porto2012) fit well within this geographic distribution.

REMARKS

Liocarcinus corrugatus was also reported from many localities in the Indo-Pacific, but d'Udekem d'Acoz (Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999) stated that all these records probably belong to one or more closely allied species. Ng et al. (Reference Ng, Wang, Ho and Shih2001) followed d'Udekem d'Acoz and excluded L. corrugatus from the checklist of brachyurans from Taiwan, but later Yaldwin & Webber (Reference Yaldwyn and Webber2011) included this species in the Decapoda checklist of New Zealand.

Our data slightly increase the bathymetric range previously reported in the literature.

Family geryonidae Colosi, Reference Colosi1923
Genus Chaceon Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1989
Chaceon maritae (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981)
(Figure 29A, B)

Geryon maritae Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 112, figures 24a, 25, 26.

Fig. 29. Chaceon maritae (Manning & Holthuis, 1981): (A) adult dorsal view, MU243; (B) juvenile CL: 21.94 mm dorsal view, MU177.

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MU01, 817–820 m, (2); MU15, 670–675 m, (1); MU17, 818–861 m, (3); MU18, 519–402 m, (40); MU19, 1222–1218 m, (1); MU23, 532–415 m, (2); MU26, 744 m, (1); MU33, 741–736 m, (2); MU46, 848–847 m, (3); MU48, 1239–1218 m, (1); MU55, 1310–1218 m, (1); MU56, 1091–1159 m, (1); MU62, 1236–1244 m, (1); MU67, 1381–1390 m, (1); MU68, 1136–1146 m, (5); MU70, 755–801 m, (3); MU73, 1330–1284 m, (1); MU79, 554–576 m, (5); MU126, 668–826 m, (2); MU177, 584–580 m, (9); MU182, 726 m, (1); MU188, 627 m, (1); MU243, 827–850 m, (3); MU267, 673–670 m, (16); MUBV03, 528–538 m, (1); MUBV13, 493–517 m, (1).

Males: 23.63–68.34 mm; females: 21.94–77.95 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree well with the original description.

BIOLOGY

Species inhabiting bottoms of mud, sandy mud and corals at depths from 100–300 m (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981; as Geryon maritae) to 1994 m (Le Roux, Reference Le Roux2001).

Although several works focus on the population dynamics of C. maritae for fishing purposes (Gaertner & Laloé, Reference Gaertner and Laloé1986; Melville Smith, Reference Melville Smith1988; Le Roux, Reference Le Roux2001), surprisingly, none of them include data about the spawning period for this species.

Our specimens were collected between 402–519 and 1381–1390 m on muddy sand and sandy mud bottoms.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

West Africa from the Western Sahara to Namibia (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981; d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999) (see Remarks). Le Roux (Reference Le Roux2001) reported this species off Namibia and Muñoz et al. (Reference Muñoz, García-Isarch, Sobrino, Burgos, Funny and González-Porto2012) from Guinea-Bissau.

REMARKS

Species occurrence in the Canary Islands (González et al., Reference González, Santana and Fernández-Vergaz1996) needs confirmation (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999).

Family macropipidae Stephenson & Campbell, Reference Stephenson and Campbell1960
Genus Bathynectes Stimpson, Reference Stimpson1871
Bathynectes piperitus Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981
(Figure 30)

Bathynectes piperitus Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 77, figures 16, 17.

Fig. 30. Bathynectes piperitus Manning & Holthuis, 1981, male CL: 13.60 mm dorsal view, MU123.

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MU02, 616–626 m, (1); MU14, 502–511 m, (6); MU15, 670–675 m, (1); MU18, 519–402 m, (31); MU23, 532–415 m (2); MU37, 403–442 m (5); MU44, 606–596 m, (14); MU45, 420–427 m, (2); MU51, 464–468 m, (2); MU52, 774–792 m, (2); MU54, 414–451 m, (1); MU57, 430–406 m, (1); MU63, 848–798 m, (59); MU64, 452–468 m, (11); MU70, 755–801 m, (1); MU71, 812–837 m, (6); MU79, 554–576 m, (2); MU123, 278–362 m, (1); MU126, 668–826 m, (3); MU127, 260–353 m, (1); MU134, 311–436 m, (1); MU143, 322 m, (2); MU175, 618–850 m, (2); MU177, 584–580 m, (2); MU179, 303–304 m, (1); MU214, 650–588 m, (1); MU222, 729–723 m, (2); MU267, 673–670 m, (1); MU276, 637–562 m, (1); MUBV02, 318–330 m, (6); MUBV03, 528–538 m, (4); MUBV09, 549–555 m, (10); MUBV10, 332–344 m, (4); MUBV13, 493–517 m (30); MUBV14, 300–281 m, (2); MUBV18, 559–574 m, (24); MUBV19, 306 m, (30); MUBV22, 300 m, (16); MUBV25, 499–520 m, (3).

Males: 13.60–55.06 mm; females: 13.13–41.98 mm; ovigerous females: 35.52–40.72 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree well with the original description.

BIOLOGY

Collected on mud, muddy sand, sand and gravel bottoms and on corals, in depths from 200 to 628 m. Ovigerous females recorded from February to June (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981).

Our specimens were captured at depths from 260–353 to 618–850 m on sand and sandy mud bottoms. Ovigerous females were collected in November and December.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

Known in West Africa, from the Cape Verde Islands (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981) and Mauritania (present work) to Namibia (Macpherson, Reference Macpherson1991), the species is probably present up to Western Saharan waters (see Remarks). Henriksen (Reference Henriksen2009) reports this species off Gabon.

REMARKS

Specimens of Bathynectes piperitus have been largely identified under the name of the European and Mediterranean B. maravigna (Prestandrea, 1839). The differences between both species were summarized by Manning & Holthuis (Reference Manning and Holthuis1981). Our Mauritanian record of B. piperitus supports the opinion expressed by Manning & Holthuis (Reference Manning and Holthuis1981) that the records of B. superbus (=B. maravigna) from Cape Bojador (Western Sahara) and Mauritania, given by Maurin (Reference Maurin1968), and those of Bathynectes, given by Filhol (Reference Filhol1885), may in fact be referable to B. piperitus.

Our records of ovigerous females determine a spawning period between November and June.

Genus Macropipus Prestandrea, 1833
Macropipus rugosus (Doflein, Reference Doflein and Chun1904)
(Figure 31)

Elliptodactylus rugosus Doflein, Reference Doflein and Chun1904: 94, pl. XXX figures 1–3, pl. XXXII figure 7.

Fig. 31. Macropipus rugosus (Doflein, 1904), ovigerous female CL: 23.43 mm dorsal view, MUBV01.

Macropipus rugosus Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 86 (references).

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MU86, 91–103 m, (3); MU90, 110 m, (6); MU101, 104–96 m, (2304); MU120, 109–105 m, (1); MU125, 103–101 m, (132); MU135, 185–173 m, (25); MU137, 81–84 m, (1); MU138, 123–130 m, (233); MU144, 119–138 m, (8); MU147, 134–139 m, (7); MU148, 215–245 m, (106); MU149, 93–146 m, (5); MU154, 92–102 m, (4819); MU155, 210–257 m, (25); MU160, 143–147 m, (565); MU161, 89–92 m, (6); MU162, 148–149 m, (232); MU166, 87–85 m, (37); MU167, 101–108 m, (354); MU168, 87–92 m, (1); MU181, 142–148 m, (18); MU184, 213–202 m, (54); MU186, 174 m, (1); MU205, 89–93 m, (1); MU208, 96–79 m, (1); MU224, 173–177 m, (12); MU227, 183–181 m, (3); MU266, 103 m, (57); MU285, 128–132 m, (31); MU291, 106–137 m, (256); MUBV01, 112 m, (1); MUBV21, 107–109 m, (4).

Males: 7.39–32.41 mm, females: 7.43–24.95 mm, ovigerous females: 18.49–23.43 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree well with the original description and with the notes provided by Guinot (Reference Guinot1961: 2).

BIOLOGY

Bottoms of mud, muddy sand, sand, broken shells, foraminifera, bryozoans and also on calcareous algae and rocks, at depths from 5 to 400 m. Ovigerous females previously recorded in June and September (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 86).

Our specimens were captured between 81–84 and 210–257 m on muddy sand, sandy mud, coarse muddy sand, sand and on coarse sand with shell debris bottoms. Ovigerous females were collected in November and December.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

West Africa from Western Sahara to Angola, including São Tomé and Príncipe Islands (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 86). Further records can be found at Nigeria, Principe and Congo (Henriksen, Reference Henriksen2009) and Guinea-Bissau (Muñoz et al., Reference Muñoz, García-Isarch, Sobrino, Burgos, Funny and González-Porto2012).

REMARKS

Ovigerous females were reported for the first time at the end of the year, indicating that this species spawns in the second half of the year.

Superfamily xanthoidea MacLeay, 1838
Family xanthidae MacLeay, 1838
Genus Monodaeus Guinot, Reference Guinot1967
Monodaeus cristulatus Guinot & Macpherson, Reference Guinot, Richer de Forges and Crosnier1988
(Figures 32A–C & 33E–H)

Monodaeus cristulatus Guinot & Macpherson, Reference Guinot, Richer de Forges and Crosnier1988: 744, figures 8, 9, 14, 19, 20, 25, 26, pl. 3 figures D–G.

Fig. 32. Monodaeus cristulatus Guinot & Macpherson, 1988: (A) medium size specimen, CL ~ 5 mm dorsal view, MUBV10; (B) male CL: 14.08 mm dorsal view, MUBV14; (C) same in ethanol.

Fig. 33. Monodaeus couchii (Couch, 1851), males: (A) CL: 22.11 mm dorsal view; (B) same, right pereiopods P3, P4, P5 detail; (C) CL: 16.09 mm dorsal view; (D) same, right pereiopods P2 to P5 detail. Monodaeus cristulatus Guinot & Macpherson, 1988, males: (E) CL: 12.02 mm dorsal view; (F) same, right pereiopods P2 to P5 detail; (G) CL: 8.36 mm dorsal view; (H) same, left pereiopods P2 to P5 detail. (A, B) ICMD 291/1981(s01); (C, D) ICMD000013; (E, F) MU212, UVIGO/03087; (G, H) MUBV10, UVIGO/11948. Scale bars: A, C, E, G, 1 cm; B, D, F, H, 1 mm.

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MU120, 109–105 m, (1); MU171, 105–100 m, (5); MU212, 163–200 m, (1); MU219, 125–129 m, (1); MU290, 311 m, (1); MUBV08, 174–168 m, (2); MUBV10, 332–344 m, (12); MUBV14, 300–281 m (1).

Males: 4.36–14.08 mm, females: 3.53–4.96 mm, ovigerous female: 6.57 mm.

COMPARATIVE MATERIAL EXAMINED

Monodaeus cristulatus: Namibia, Exp. Benguela XII, station P42, 185 m, 28°56′59.99″S 14°55′47.99″E, Macpherson, E. det., 10 specimens (USNM 221965); Exp. Benguela XIV, station P53, 179–183 m, 29°19′S 15°05′E, Macpherson, E. det., three specimens: 1 male CL: 15.58 mm (ICMD000034) and two juveniles CL: 4.30 mm (ICMD000037) and 3.77 mm (ICMD000039).

Monodaeus couchii (Couch, 1851): Gulf of Cádiz, Exp. ARSA0311, station L14, 692 m, 36°12′54.0″N 7°00′32.4″W, 2 females CL: 11.31 and 9.20 mm (IEO-CD-AR11/001); station L31, 359 m, 36°02′27.6″N 6°20′09.6″W, 1 male CL: 7.31 mm (IEO-CD-AR11/017). Morocco (Atlantic coast): Exp. CCLME 2012, station 297, 239 m, 34°52′03.0″N 6°45′24.1″W, 1 female CL: 14.23 mm (IEO-CD-CCLME12/1226). NW Mediterranean: Barcelona, Exp. Pont 90, station G3, 192–430 m, 41°07′59.9″N 2°03′00.0″E, Sardá, F. det., 4 specimens: 2 males CL: 22.11 mm (ICMD 291/1981(s01)) and 22.42 mm (ICMD 291/1981(s02)), 2 ovigerous females CL: 17.03 mm (ICMD 291/1981(s03)) and 14.25 mm (ICMD 291/1981(s04)). SW Mediterranean: Málaga, Exp. Medits94 station Lance 16, 553–563 m, 36°23′48.1″N 4°28′54.5″W (off Pta. Calaburras), Abelló, P. det., 1 female CL: 12.34 mm (ICMD000005); Exp. Medits97 station Lance 6, 721–735 m, 36°18′33.1″N 4°44′34.1″W (off Marbella), Abelló, P. det., 1 male CL: 16.09 mm (ICMD000013); Exp. Medits97 station Lance 19, 524–526 m, 36°36′59.4″N 3°48′56.8″W (off Nerja), Abelló, P. det., 1 male CL: 20.60 mm (ICMD000017).

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree with the original description (see Remarks).

BIOLOGY

This species was captured on coral, at depths from 160 to 300 m; ovigerous females were reported from July and August (label with paratypes ICMD000031, ICMD000032 and ICMD000033; Guinot & Macpherson, Reference Guinot, Richer de Forges and Crosnier1988: 744).

Our specimens were found on sandy bottoms and hidden in the holes of large stones hauled up in the net, at depths from 100–105 to 332–344 m. The ovigerous female was captured in December.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

Western Africa in Mauritania (present work) and Namibia (Guinot & Macpherson, Reference Guinot, Richer de Forges and Crosnier1988) (see Remarks).

REMARKS

Monodaeus cristulatus has only been previously reported from Namibian coasts (28°–29°S). Following Guinot & Macpherson (Reference Guinot, Richer de Forges and Crosnier1988), the closest species is Monodaeus couchii, previously reported from various localities of NW Africa (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981), including Mauritanian waters (Milne-Edwards & Bouvier, Reference Milne-Edwards, Bouvier and Milne-Edwards1900; Anadon, Reference Anadon1981; Fransen, Reference Fransen1991). We have compared our material with specimens of M. cristulatus from Namibia and with samples of M. couchii from the Western Mediterranean, Gulf of Cádiz and Moroccan Atlantic coasts (see comparative material examined). After these comparisons, we included our specimens in M. cristulatus, due to the presence of a dorsal crest on P2–P5 meri and a proximal protuberance on P2–P4 dorsal carpi (Figure 33E–H), which are absent in M. couchii (Figure 33A–D). In juveniles of M. cristulatus the specific characters are not clearly developed (Guinot & Macpherson, Reference Guinot, Richer de Forges and Crosnier1988), which hinders species separation when studying isolated specimens. However, checking a series of different features on specimens of various sizes allows for accurate identification.

The possible misidentification of the two species and our findings of Monodaeus cristulatus in Mauritanian waters point to a need for a revision of the records of M. couchii south of Cape Blanc. Our records suggest that M. cristulatus can be found along the West African coast between Banc d'Arguin, Mauritania and Namibia.

Subsection thoracotremata Guinot, Reference Guinot1977
Superfamily grapsoidea MacLeay, 1838
Family plagusiidae Dana, Reference Dana1851
Genus Euchirograpsus H. Milne-Edwards, Reference Milne-Edwards1853
Euchirograpsus liguricus H. Milne-Edwards, Reference Milne-Edwards1853
(Figure 34)

Euchirograpsus liguricus H. Milne-Edwards, Reference Milne-Edwards1853: 175; Türkay, Reference Türkay1975: 105, figures 1–3, 17, 23 (references)

Fig. 34. Euchirograpsus liguricus H. Milne-Edwards, 1853, male CL: 20.68 mm dorsal view, MUBV14.

.

MATERIAL EXAMINED

MU290, 311 m, (3); MUBV14, 300–281 m, (3).

Males: 6.61–20.68 mm; females: 6.30–11.39 mm.

IDENTIFICATION

Our specimens agree well with the description provided by Türkay (Reference Türkay1975: 105) and with the comments and pictures after Giacobbe & Spano (Reference Giacobbe and Spano2006).

BIOLOGY

Collected on gravel, shell, sand, sandy mud and muddy bottoms, the species is also recorded on bottoms of rock with gorgonians, sponges, calcareous algae and kelp, and coral reefs (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981: 248; d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999: 250, Giacobbe & Spano, Reference Giacobbe and Spano2006). Depth records range between 10 m (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999: 250) and 620–621 m (Abelló et al., Reference Abelló, Carbonell and Torres2002). Ovigerous females were collected only in March (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981).

Our material was collected at 281–300 and 311 m. The species was caught in a ghost net hauled with the Lofoten trawl and in the holes of a large stone captured with the beam trawl.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION

East Atlantic from West Portugal to Namibia including the Azores, Madeira, Savage, Canary and Cape Verde Islands; Western and Central Mediterranean Sea (d'Udekem d'Acoz, Reference d'Udekem d'Acoz1999; Giacobbe & Spano, Reference Giacobbe and Spano2006). Abelló et al. (Reference Abelló, Carbonell and Torres2002) report this species from the Eastern Alborán Sea.

DISCUSSION

A total of 10,514 brachyuran specimens were studied from waters off Mauritania at depths from 79 to 1867 m, comprising 33 species belonging to 17 families and 24 genera. The brachyuran diversity found in recent works carried out with a similar methodology on West African coasts is slightly lower than the values of our study. García Raso (Reference García Raso1996) reported 31 brachyuran species from the Ibero-Moroccan Bay and adjacent waters at depths from 137 to 2142 m; Muñoz et al. (Reference Muñoz, García-Isarch, Sobrino, Burgos, Funny and González-Porto2012) listed 44 brachyuran species off Guinea-Bissau at depths between 20 and 1000 m, of which only 24 were found deeper than 80 m; and Macpherson (Reference Macpherson1991) included 21 brachyuran species in Namibian waters from 100 to 1000 m.

The most abundant species so far was Macropipus rugosus (89%), mainly due to the high number of specimens captured at two stations off Nouakchott (MU101, 2304 specimens; MU154, 4819 specimens). However, the remaining stations showed similar abundances to those reported for this species in Guinea-Bissau (Muñoz et al., Reference Muñoz, García-Isarch, Sobrino, Burgos, Funny and González-Porto2012), Guinea (Le Loeuf, Reference Le Lœuff1993) and the Gulf of Guinea (Henriksen, Reference Henriksen2009). Conversely, the following three species, Atelecyclus rotundatus, Ethusa rosacea and Macropodia longipes, were represented by only one specimen each. The low abundance of A. rotundatus is probably explained by its burrowing behaviour (González-Gurriarán & Méndez, Reference González-Gurriarán, Méndez, Castro-Sada and Coruña1986; S. de Matos-Pita, unpublished data), which hinders or prevents the capture of the species by the trawl. Macropodia longipes, although reported from the Gulf of Gascogne to the Cape Verde Islands and the Mediterranean Sea, has only been recorded in Mauritanian waters on the Banc d'Arguin (Forest, Reference Forest1978, as Macropodia tenuirostris longipes). Ethusa rosacea and M. longipes are both considered as rare species because they were seldom reported and always in very low abundance (Monod, Reference Monod1956; Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981; Henriksen, Reference Henriksen2009).

Different patterns are observed for the latitudinal distribution of the species in the area studied. Eleven species, Homola barbata, Paromola cuvieri, Acanthocarpus brevispinis, Goneplax barnardi, Inachus angolensis, Macropodia gilsoni, M. macrocheles, Chaceon maritae, Bathynectes piperitus, Macropipus rugosus and Monodaeus cristulatus, are evenly distributed along most of the Mauritanian coast. Three species, Medorippe lanata, Eurynome aspera and Distolambrus maltzami, were sampled only north of Cape Timiris, and another six, Ethusa rosacea, Pisa armata, Inachus aguiarii, Macropodia hesperiae, M. longipes and Euchirograpsus liguricus were only captured between Cape Timiris and the Senegalese border. Calappa pelii, Ethusa rugulosa, Goneplax rhomboides, Pseudomyra mbizi, Inachus grallator, I. nanus, Solenolambrus noordendei and Spinolambrus notialis were scarcely sampled north and south of Cape Timiris. Finally, another five species, Cymonomus granulatus, Atelecyclus rotundatus, Ebalia nux, Inachus leptochirus and Liocarcinus corrugatus, were sampled only off Cape Blanc.

Analysis of the geographic distribution reveals three different contingents within the Mauritanian brachyuran fauna. The main zoogeographic group (18 species, 54.5%) is composed of species distributed along the West African coast, mainly in the tropical region. Within this group, 14 species, A. brevispinis, C. pelii, E. rosacea, E. rugulosa, G. barnardi, P. mbizi, I. angolensis, M. gilsoni, M. macrocheles, S. noordendei, S. notialis, C. maritae, B. piperitus and M. rugosus were mostly evenly reported from the Western Sahara and Mauritania to Angola and Namibia. Two species, I. nanus and M. hesperiae, were reported between Mauritania and the Gulf of Guinea. Inachus grallator, previously reported between the Gulf of Guinea and Namibia, and M. cristulatus, only known from the type locality (Namibia), have a discontinuous latitudinal distribution and are now both recorded in Mauritanian waters. Species with a restricted and/or discontinuous distribution in tropical West Africa have been reported in recent decades (Manning & Holthuis, Reference Manning and Holthuis1981; Macpherson, Reference Macpherson1991), but a more complete sampling effort in West African waters will certainly extend their known distribution.

The second zoogeographic group (10 species, 30.3%) is represented by species widely distributed in the Lusitanian province, including the Mediterranean Sea. The southern limit of the Lusitanian province was recently established at Cape Juby (south Morocco) by Briggs & Bowen (Reference Briggs and Bowen2012), but set up at Cap Vert (Senegal) by Briggs (Reference Briggs1995). Macropodia longipes is the only species with a strictly Lusitanian distribution, while the distributional limits of the remaining species extend further northwards or southwards. Five species range southwards to Guinea (I. aguiarii), Angola (D. maltzami), Namibia (E. liguricus), South Africa (H. barbata) and even into the Indian Ocean up to Mozambican waters (M. lanata). Another four species, C. granulatus, G. rhomboides, E. nux and I. leptochirus, extend their distribution area to northern European seas.

Finally, the third zoogeographic group includes five species (15%) widely distributed in the E Atlantic and Mediterranean, with records from northern European seas southwards to Angola (P. armata and L. corrugatus), South Africa (P. cuvieri and A. rotundatus) and even to Durban in the West Indian Ocean (E. aspera).

In this region, the affinity with Atlantic-Mediterranean fauna was previously reported for different taxa: Porifera (van Soest, Reference Van Soest1993), Hydrozoa (Ansín Agís et al., Reference Ansín Agís, Ramil and Vervoort2001), Bryozoa (Aristegui & Cruz, Reference Aristegui and Cruz1986) and Echinodermata (Hernández et al., Reference Hernández, Clemente, Tuya, Pérez-Ruzafa, Sangil, Moro-Abad, Bacallado-Aránega, Alvarado and Solís-Marín2013; Calero et al., Reference Calero, Ramil, Ramos, Ramos, Sanz and Ramilin preparation). For all these taxa, the Canary Current was highlighted as the main means of larval dispersion southwards, also enabling the presence of typical boreal species, such as C. granulatus, G. rhomboides, E. nux and I. leptochirus, in NW African waters. Conversely, the presence of tropical species in Mauritania (C. pelii, E. rosacea, E. rugulosa, G. barnardi, P. mbizi, I. angolensis, I. grallator, I. nanus, M. gilsoni, M. hesperiae, M. macrocheles, S. noordendei, S. notialis, C. maritae, B. piperitus and M. rugosus) is more difficult to explain because of dominant current systems precluding their dispersion northwards (Aristegui & Cruz, Reference Aristegui and Cruz1986; Hernández et al., Reference Hernández, Clemente, Tuya, Pérez-Ruzafa, Sangil, Moro-Abad, Bacallado-Aránega, Alvarado and Solís-Marín2013). However, a thin surface coastal current flowing northwards along the Gabonese and Congolese coasts (Stramma & Schott, Reference Stramma and Schott1999), and the so-called ‘Mauritania Current’ (Stramma & Schott, Reference Stramma and Schott1999) flowing northwards in summer and autumn between Cap Vert and Cape Blanc (Pastor et al., Reference Pastor, Pelegrí, Hernández-Guerra, Font, Salat and Emelianov2008), probably facilitate the northwards dispersion of tropical species along the West African coastline. The importance of small currents in the dispersion of species was highlighted by Briggs (Reference Briggs1995) as the main way of successfully transporting species in an opposite direction to that of the main flow across the Tropical Pacific and the Atlantic Oceans.

There are three bathymetrical groups of brachyurans in Mauritanian waters. The first group includes 13 species collected exclusively on the shelf (80–200 m; C. pelii, M. lanata, P. mbizi, P. armata, I. aguiarii, I. nanus, M. gilsoni, M. hesperiae, M. longipes, E. aspera, D. maltzami, S. notialis and L. corrugatus); the second is represented by nine species collected both on the shelf and upper slope (80–400 m; H. barbata, E. rugulosa, G. rombhoides, I. angolensis, I. leptochirus, M. macrocheles, S. noordendei, M. rugosus and M. cristulatus); and the third accounts for nine species exclusively recorded along the upper slope (300–700 m; P. cuvieri, C. granulatus, A. brevispinis, A. rotundatus, G. barnardi, E. nux, I. grallator, B. piperitus and E. liguricus) (Figure 35). In addition, C. maritae was collected on the upper and middle slope (460–1385 m) and E. rosacea only at 1024 m.

Fig. 35. Depth records of brachyuran species. Translucent continuous line from MAURIT surveys, dotted line from the literature.

Despite the increase in decapod diversity with depth described in several regions, peaking between 1000 and 2000 m (see Muñoz et al., Reference Muñoz, García-Isarch, Sobrino, Burgos, Funny and González-Porto2012 for references), brachyuran crabs do not seem to follow this general trend in Mauritanian waters.

Our results emphasize the highest specific richness of the deep shelf (22 species, 66.66%) and its drastic reduction beyond 700 m (two species, 6.06%). The importance of crustaceans and at least of some brachyuran families (Inachidae, Portunidae, Parthenopidae and Dorippiidae) on the Mauritanian deep shelf was previously pointed out by Duineveld et al. (Reference Duineveld, Lavalaye, Van Noort, Wolff, Van Der Land, Nieuhuis and de Wilde1993). A similar bathymetric pattern was described for the brachyurans off Guinea-Bissau by Muñoz et al. (Reference Muñoz, García-Isarch, Sobrino, Burgos, Funny and González-Porto2012), clearly dominated by shelf species and only three typical deep species, which also include C. maritae. Soto (Reference Soto1991) also reported a strong reduction in species diversity beyond 500 and 700 m in the Straits of Florida. This reduction was related to the high trophic level of brachyurans and the more limited food availability in deep waters (Escobar-Briones et al., Reference Escobar-Briones, Gaytan-Caballero and Legendre2008).

Analysis of bathymetric ranges shows that in Mauritanian waters all but three of the studied species are stenobathic, with depth ranges narrower than 300 m (Menzies et al., Reference Menzies, George and Rowe1973; Pielou, Reference Pielou1992). Only P. cuvieri, C. maritae and B. piperitus (depth ranges of 322, 397 and 925 m, respectively) can be considered eurybathic species. However, considering data from the literature, only 13 of the studied species are stenobathic (E. rugulosa, P. mbizi, P. armata, I. aguiarii, I. grallator, I. nanus, M. gilsoni, M. hesperiae, M. macrocheles, S. noordendei, S. notialis, L. corrugatus and M. cristulatus). In consequence, the Mauritanian brachyuran fauna is dominated by eurybathic species, a feature also shared with the brachyurans of the Straits of Florida (Soto, Reference Soto1991).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors wish to thank all those who made possible the study of the material captured in Maurit surveys, especially Dr Ana Ramos and the Spanish Institute of Oceanography (IEO). We thank Drs Félix Pérez and Pere Abelló from the Instituto de Ciencias Marinas (ICM-CSIC) for their invaluable help and patience in locating some of the comparison material checked here. We would also like to thank Luis Miguel Agudo for providing the map.

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

This work was undertaken within the framework of the ECOAFRIK project and was partially funded by the Galician government (Spain, Project Ref. 10MMA602020PR) and by the ‘MAVA Fondation pour la nature’ (MAVA contract 12/87 AO C4/2012). This is ECOAFRIK publication number 5.

References

REFERENCES

Abelló, P., Carbonell, A. and Torres, P. (2002) Biogeography of epibenthic crustaceans on the shelf and upper slope off the Iberian Peninsula Mediterranean coasts: implications for the establishment of natural management areas. Scientia Marina 66, 183198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahyong, S.T., Lai, J.C.Y., Sharkey, D., Colgan, D.J. and Ng, P.K.L. (2007) Phylogenetics of the brachyuran crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda): the status of Podotremata based on small subunit nuclear ribosomal RNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 45, 576586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahyong, S.T., Lowry, J.K., Alonso, M., Bamber, R.N., Boxshall, G.A., Castro, P., Gerken, S., Karaman, G.S., Goy, J.W., Jones, D.S., Meland, K., Rogers, D.C. and Svavarsson, J. (2011) Subphylum Crustacea Brünnich, 1772. In Zhang, Z.-Q. (ed.) Animal biodiversity: an outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness. Zootaxa 3148, 165191.Google Scholar
Anadon, R. (1981) Crustáceos Decápodos recogidos durante la campaña ‘Atlor VII’ en las costas noroccidentales de Africa (Noviembre 1975). Resultados Expediciones Cientificas 9, 151159.Google Scholar
Ansín Agís, J., Ramil, F. and Vervoort, W. (2001) Atlantic Leptolida (Hydrozoa, Cnidaria) of the families Aglaopheniidae, Halopterididae, Kirchenpaueriidae and Plumulariidae collected during the CANCAP and Mauritania-II expeditions of the National Museum of Natural History, Leiden, the Netherlands. Zoologische Verhandelingen 233, 268 pp.Google Scholar
Aristegui, J. and Cruz, T. (1986) Consideraciones biogeográficas sobre el orden Cheilostomata (Ectoprocta) en Canarias. Vieraea 16, 161171.Google Scholar
Ateş, A.S., Katağan, T. and Kocataş, A. (2006) Bathymetric distribution of decapod crustaceans on the continental shelf along the Aegean coasts of Turkey. Crustaceana 79, 129141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, R.J.A. (1974) Behavioural ecology of the mud-burrowing crab Goneplax rhomboides . Marine Biology 25, 239252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballesteros, E. (2006) Mediterranean coralligenous assemblages: a synthesis of present knowledge. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 44, 123195.Google Scholar
Barnard, K.H. (1950) Descriptive catalogue of South African decapod Crustacea. Annals of the South African Museum 38, 1837.Google Scholar
Barnard, K.H. (1955) Additions to the fauna-list of South African Crustacea and Pycnogonida. Annals of the South African Museum 43, 1107.Google Scholar
Berggren, M. (2008) Ny krabba funnen i Skagerrak. [A new crab discovered in the Skagerrak]. Fauna och Flora (Stockholm) 103, 2021.Google Scholar
Berggren, M. and Stefan, A. (2010) Fyrkantskrabba Goneplax rhomboides etablerad pa vastkusten [Angular crab Goneplax rhomboides established along the Swedish west Coast]. Fauna och Flora (Stockholm) 105, 811.Google Scholar
Biagi, F., Sartor, P., Ardizzone, G.D., Belcari, P., Belluscio, A. and Serena, F. (2002) Analysis of demersal assemblages off the Tuscany and Latium coasts (north-western Mediterranean). Scientia Marina 66, 233242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouvier, E.-L. (1897) Sur la classification, les origines et la distribution des crabes de la famille des Dorippidés. Bulletin de la Société Philomathique de Paris, 8e série 9, 5470.Google Scholar
Bouvier, E.L. (1940) Décapodes marcheurs. Faune de France 37, 1404.Google Scholar
Briggs, J.C. (1995) Global biogeography. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Briggs, J.C. and Bowen, B.R. (2012) A realignment of marine biogeographic provinces with particular reference to fish distributions. Journal of Biogeography 39, 1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calero, B., Ramil, F. and Ramos, A. (in preparation) Echinoderms of Mauritanian deep bottoms. In Ramos, A., Sanz, J.L. and Ramil, F. (eds) Deep-sea ecosystems off Mauritania. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Capart, A. (1951) Crustacés Décapodes Brachyures. Expédition océanographique Belge dans les eaux côtières africaines de l'Atlantique Sud (1948–1949) . Résultats Scientifiques 3, 11205, Plates 1–3.Google Scholar
Capezzuto, F., Maiorano, P., Panza, M., Indennidate, A., Sion, L. and D'Onghia, G. (2012) Occurrence and behaviour of Paromola cuvieri (Crustacea, Decapoda) in the Santa Maria di Leuca cold-water coral community (Mediterranean Sea). Deep-sea Research. Part 1. Oceanographic Research Papers 59, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartes, J.E., Maynou, F., Fanelli, E., Papiol, V. and Lloris, D. (2009) Long-term changes in the composition and diversity of deep-slope megabenthos and trophic webs off Catalonia (western Mediterranean): are trends related to climatic oscillations? Progress in Oceanography 82, 3246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartes, J.E., Maynou, F., Moranta, J., Massuti, E., Lloris, D. and Morales-Nin, B. (2004) Patterns of bathymetric distribution among deep-sea fauna at local spatial scale: comparison of mainland vs insular areas. Progress in Oceanography 60, 2945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartes, J.E., Serrano, A., Velasco, F., Parra, S. and Sánchez, F. (2007) Community structure and dynamics of deep-water decapod assemblages from Le Danois Bank (Cantabrian Sea, NE Atlantic): influence of environmental variables and food availability. Progress in Oceanography 75, 797816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro, P. (2007) A reappraisal of the family Goneplacidae MacLeay, 1838 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura) and revision of the subfamily Goneplacinae, with the description of 10 new genera and 18 new species. Zoosystema 29, 609774.Google Scholar
Colloca, F., Carpentieri, P., Balestri, E. and Ardizzone, G.D. (2004) A critical habitat for Mediterranean fish resources: shelf-break areas with Leptometra phalangium (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Marine Biology 145, 11291142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colosi, G. (1923) Una specie fossile de Gerionide (Decapodi brachiuri). Bolettino della Societá dei Naturalisti in Napoli 35 (Series 2, Vol. 15), 248255.Google Scholar
Company, J.B., Maiorano, P., Tselepides, A., Politou, C.Y., Plaity, W., Rotllant, G. and Sardà, F. (2004) Deep-sea decapod crustaceans in the western and central Mediterranean Sea: preliminary aspects of species distribution, biomass and population structure. Scientia Marina 68, 7386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dana, J.D. (1851) Conspectus Crustaceorum quæ in Orbis Terrarum circumnavigatione, Carolo Wilkes e Classe Reipublicæ Fœderatæ Duce, lexit et descripsit. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 5, 247254.Google Scholar
de Brito Capello, F. (1876) Catalogo dos Crustaceos de Portugal. Jornal de sciencias mathematicas, physicas e naturaes, Lisboa 5, 264274, plate.Google Scholar
De Grave, S., Pentcheff, N.D., Ahyong, S.T., Chan, T.-Y., Crandall, K.A., Dworschak, P.C., Felder, D.L., Feldmann, R.M., Fransen, C.H.J.M., Goulding, L.Y.D., Lemaitre, R., Low, M.E.Y., Martin, J.W., Ng, P.K.L., Schweitzer, C.E., Tan, S.H., Tshudy, D. and Wetzer, R. (2009) A classification of the living and fossil genera of decapod Crustaceans. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology (Suppl. 21), 1109.Google Scholar
Doflein, F. (1904) Brachyura. In Chun, C. (ed.) Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition auf dem Dampfer ‘Valdivia’ 1898–1899, Volume 6. Jena: Verlag von Gustav Fischer, i–xiv, 314 pp, 58 plates, 1 text plate.Google Scholar
d'Udekem d'Acoz, C. (1999) Inventaire et distribution des crustacés décapodes de l'Atlantique nord-oriental, de la Méditerranée et des eaux continentales adjacentes au nord de 25°N. Patrimonies Naturels (M.N.H.N./S.P.N.) 40, 1383.Google Scholar
Duineveld, G.C.A., Lavalaye, M.S.S. and Van Noort, G.J. (1993) The trawl fauna of the Mauritanian shelf (Northwest Africa): density, species composition and biomass. In Wolff, W.J., Van Der Land, J., Nieuhuis, P.H. and de Wilde, P.A.W.J. (eds) Ecological studies in the coastal waters of Mauritania: Proceedings of a symposium held at Leiden, the Netherlands, 2527 March 1991. Hydrobiologia 258, 165174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Lakhrach, H., Hattour, A., Jarboui, O., Elhasni, K. and Ramos-Esplá, A. (2012) Spatial distribution and abundance of the stomatopoda and decapoda crustaceans sampled by bottom trawl in the Gulf of Gabes (Tunisia, Central Mediterranean). Cahiers de Biologie Marine 53, 435446.Google Scholar
Ellis, J.R., Martinez, I., Burt, G.J. and Scott, B.E. (2013) Epibenthic assemblages in the Celtic Sea and associated with the Jones Bank. Progress in Oceanography 117, 7688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escobar-Briones, E.G., Gaytan-Caballero, A. and Legendre, P. (2008) Epibenthic megacrustaceans from the continental margin, slope and abyssal plain of the Southwestern Gulf of Mexico: factors responsible for variability in species composition and diversity. Deep Sea Research 55, 26672678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. (1793) Entomologia systematica emendata et aucta. Secundum, Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species adjectis synonymis, locis, observationibus, descriptionibus, Volume 2. Christian Gottlieb Proft, Hafniae (=Copenhagen) viii+519 pp.Google Scholar
Fanelli, E.F., Cartes, J.E., Badalamenti, F., Rumolo, P. and Sprovieri, M. (2009) Trophodynamics of suprabenthic fauna on coastal muddy bottoms of the southern Tyrrhenian Sea (western Mediterranean). Journal of Sea Research 61, 174187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanelli, E.F., Colloca, F. and Ardizzone, G.D. (2007) Decapod crustacean assemblages off the West coast of central Italy (western Mediterranean). Scientia Marina 71, 1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filhol, H. (1885) La vie au fond des mers. Paris: La Nature 13(1) (623, 9 May), 355–358, figs. 1–3; (626, 30 May), 411–414, figs. 1, 2; 13(2) (630, 27 June), 55–58, figs. 1–3; (635, 1 August), 132–134, figs. 1–3; (641, 12 September), 227–230, figs. 1–3; (644, 3 October), 283–286, figs. 1–4; (650, 14 November), 379–382, figs. 1, 2; (652, 28 November), 407–410, figs. 1–3.Google Scholar
Forest, J. (1957) Sur la validité et le nom des deux espèces d'Atelecyclus (Crustacea Decapoda Brachyura). Bulletin du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris, 2e série 29, 469474.Google Scholar
Forest, J. (1978) Le genre Macropodia Leach dans les eaux atlantiques européennes (Crustacea Brachyura Majidae). Cahiers de Biologie Marine 19, 323342.Google Scholar
Forest, J. and Zariquiey Álvarez, R. (1964) Le genre Macropodia Leach en Méditerranée. I. Description et étude comparative des espèces (Crustacea Brachyura Majidae). Bulletin du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris, 2e série 36, 222244.Google Scholar
Fransen, C.H.J.M. (1991) Preliminary report on Crustacea collected in the eastern part of the North Atlantic during CANCAP and MAURITANIA Expeditions of the former Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden. Leiden: National Natuurhistorich Museum, 200 pp.Google Scholar
Gaertner, D. and Laloé, F. (1986) Étude biométrique de la taille à première maturité sexuelle de Geryon maritae Manning et Holthuis, 1981 du Sénégal. Oceanologica Acta 9, 479487.Google Scholar
García-Muñoz, J.E., Manjón-Cabeza, M.E. and García-Raso, J.E. (2008) Decapod crustacean assemblages from littoral bottoms of the Alborán Sea (Spain, west Mediterranean Sea): spatial and temporal variability. Scientia Marina 72, 437449.Google Scholar
García Raso, J.E. (1984) Brachyura of the coast of Southern Spain. Spixiana 7, 105113.Google Scholar
García Raso, J.E. (1989) Resultados de la segunda campaña del I.E.O. para la exploración de los fondos de Coral Rojo en el Mar de Alborán. Crustáceos Decápodos. Boletín Intituto Español de Oceanografía 5, 2736.Google Scholar
García Raso, J.E. (1996) Crustacea Decapoda (excl. Sergestidae) from Ibero-Moroccan waters. Results of Balgim-84 Expedition. Bulletin of Marine Science 58, 730752.Google Scholar
García Raso, J.E. and Manjón-Cabeza, M.E. (2002) An infralittoral decapod crustacean community of southern Spain affected by anthropogenic disturbances. Journal of Crustacean Biology 22, 8390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giacobbe, S. and Spano, N. (2006) A new record of Euchirograpsus liguricus (Decapoda, Brachyura) in the Mediterranean Sea. Crustaceana 79, 555562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, J.A., Santana, J.I. and Fernández-Vergaz, V. (1996) The family Geryonidae (Decapoda, Brachyura) in the Canary Islands. Crustaceana 69, 627635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Gurriarán, E. and Méndez, M. (1986) Crustáceos decápodos das costas de Galicia. I. Brachyura . Cuadernos da Área de Ciencias Biolóxicas, Seminario de Estudos Galegos, Volume 2 (2nd edition). Ed. do Castro, Castro-Sada, O. and Coruña, A. Do Castro, pp. 1242.Google Scholar
González Pérez, J.A. (1995) Catálogo de los Crustáceos Decápodos de las Islas Canarias. Gambas, Langostas, Cangrejos. Santa Cruz de Tenerife: Publicaciones. Turquesa, 282 pp.Google Scholar
González Pérez, J.A. and Quiles Lucas, J.A. (2003) Arthropoda Decapoda. In Moro, L., Martín, J.L., Garrido, M.J. and Izquierdo, I. (eds) Lista de especies marinas de Canarias (algas, hongos, plantas y animales). Consejería de Política Territorial y Medio Ambiente del Gobierno de Canarias, España, pp. 7480.Google Scholar
Griffin, D.J.G. (1974) Spider crabs (Crustacea: Brachyura: Majidae) from the International Indian Ocean Expedition, 1963–1964. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 182, 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerao, G. and Abelló, P. (2007) The first zoea morphology of Inachus aguiarii, Inachus communissimus and Ergasticus clouei (Decapoda, Brachyura, Majoidea) with implications for Inachidae systematics. Zootaxa 1429, 5568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillén, J. E., Gras, D., Soler, G. and Triviño, A. (2011) Relationship between taxocenoses of decapod crustaceans and characteristics of coastal detritic bottoms in the east and southeast of the Spanish coast. Mediterranea. Serie Estudios Biológicos, Época II, Número Especial, 31 pp.Google Scholar
Guinot, D. (1961) Caracteres et affinites de Macropipus australis sp.nov., Crustace Decapode Brachyoure de la cote sud-ouest Africaine. Bulletin de l'Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique 37, 113, figures 1–7, plates 1, 2.Google Scholar
Guinot, D. (1967) Recherches préliminaires sur les groupements naturels chez les Crustacés Décapodes Brachyoures. II. Les anciens genres Micropanope Stimpson et Medaeus Dana. Bulletin du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris, 2e série 39, 345374.Google Scholar
Guinot, D. (1977) Propositions pour une nouvelle classification des Crustacés Décapodes Brachyoures. Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l'Académie des sciences, série D 285, 10491052.Google Scholar
Guinot, D. and Castro, P. (2007) A new species of Goneplax Leach, 1814 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Goneplacidae) from the south Atlantic and the western limits of the Indo-West Pacific region, long confused with G. rhomboides (Linnaeus, 1758). Zootaxa 1577, 1731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinot, D. and Macpherson, E. (1988) Remarques sur le genre Monodaeus Guinot, 1967, avec la description de deux espèces nouvelles (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura). Bulletin du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris, 4e série 10, 731757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinot, D. and Richer de Forges, B. (1995) Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura: Révision de la famille des Homolidae de Haan, 1839. In Crosnier, A. (ed.) Résultats des Campagnes MUSORSTOM, Volume 13. Mémoires du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle Paris 163, 283517.Google Scholar
Haan, W. de (1833–1850) Crustacea. In Siebold, P. F. von (ed.) Fauna Japonica sive Descriptio animalium, quae in Itinere per Japoniam, jussu et auspiciis Superiorum, Qui Summun in India Batava Imperium Tenent, suscepto, Annis 1823–1830 collegit, notis, observationibus e adumbrationibus illustravit. Lugduni-Batavorum, Leiden, fasc. 1–8, pp. i–xxx, i–xvii, i–xxxi, 1–243, plates 1–55, A–J, L–Q, circular Table 2. [1833, fasc. 1, Praemissa, pp. ix, x; 1839, fasc. 4, pp. 73–108.]Google Scholar
Henriksen, C.S. (2009) Investigation of crustaceans from shelf areas in the Gulf of Guinea, with special emphasis on Brachyura . Master thesis. University of Bergen, Norway, 163 pp.Google Scholar
Herklots, J.A. (1851) Addimenta ad Faunam Carcinologicam Africae Occidentalis, sive, Descriptiones specierum novarum e Crustaceorum ordine quas in Guinea collegit vir strenuus H.S. Pel. Leiden: Lugduni-Batavorum, pp. 131.Google Scholar
Hernández, J.C., Clemente, S., Tuya, F., Pérez-Ruzafa, A., Sangil, C., Moro-Abad, L. and Bacallado-Aránega, J.J. (2013) Echinoderms of the Canary Islands, Spain. In Alvarado, J.J. and Solís-Marín, F.A. (eds) Echinoderm research and diversity in Latin America. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 471510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isajlović, I., Vrgoč, N. and Dulčić, J. (2009) On a record of the box crab, Paromola cuvieri (Risso, 1816) (Decapoda, Brachyura, Homolidae) in the south-east Adriatic (Croatian waters). Crustaceana 82, 10871090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latreille, P.A. (1802) Histoire naturelle, générale et particulière des Crustacés et des Insectes. Ouvrage faisant suite à l'histoire naturelle générale et particulière, composée par Leclerc de Buffon, et rédigée par C.S. Sonnini, membre de plusieurs Sociétés savantes. Familles naturelles des genres. Tome 3. Paris: F. Dufart, 467 pp.Google Scholar
Latreille, P.A. (1803) Histoire naturelle générale et particulière des Crustacés et des insectes. Tome 6. Paris: F. Dufart, 390 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, W.E. (1813–1815) Crustaceology. In Brewster, D. (ed.) The Edinburgh Encyclopædia. Vol. 7. Edinburgh: Blackwood, pp. 383384 [1813], 385–437, 765–766 [1814], plate 221 [1815].Google Scholar
Leach, W.E. (1815–1875) Malacostraca podophthalmata britanniæ; or descriptions of such British species of the Linnean genus Cancer as have their eyes elevated on footstalks. London: Sowerby, 124 pp, plates 1–45.Google Scholar
Le Lœuff, P. (1993) La faune benthique des fonds chalut, ables du plateau continental de la Guinée. Premiers résultats en référence à la faune de la Côte-d'Ivoire. Revue d'Hydrobiologie Tropicale 26, 229252.Google Scholar
Le Roux, L. (2001) The impact of emigration on population estimates of deep-sea red crab Chaceon maritae off Namibia. South African Journal of Marine Sciences 23, 6166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linnaeus, C. (1758) Systema naturæ per regna tria naturæ, secundum classses, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio decima reformata. Holmiæ, Impensis direct, Laurentii Salvii (Estocolmo, Salvius publ.), tomus I, 1824.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. (1767) Systema naturae, Tom. I. Pars II. Editio duodecima, reformata. Holmiae: Laurentii Salvii, pp. 5331327.Google Scholar
Macpherson, E. (1983) Crustáceos decápodos capturados en las costas de Namibia. Resultados Expediciones Cientificas 11, 380.Google Scholar
Macpherson, E. (1988) Revision of the family Lithodidae Samouelle, 1819 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura) in the Atlantic Ocean. Monografías de Zoología Marina 2, 9153.Google Scholar
Macpherson, E. (1991) Biogeography and community structure of the decapod Crustacean fauna of Namibia (Southeast Atlantic). Journal of Crustacean Biology 11, 401415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, R.B. and Holthuis, L.B. (1981) West African Brachyuran Crabs. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 306, 1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, R.B. and Holthuis, L.B. (1989) Two new genera and nine new species of geryonid crabs (Crustacea, Decapoda, Geryonidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 102, 5077.Google Scholar
Martin, J.W. and Haney, T.A. (2005) Decapod crustaceans from hydrothermal vents and cold seeps: a review through 2005. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 145, 445522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massi, D., Micalizzi, R., Giusto, G.B. and Pipitone, C. (2010) First record of Heterocrypta maltzami Miers, 1881 (Decapoda, Brachyura, Parthenopidae) in the Strait of Sicily. Crustaceana 83, 11411145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurin, C. (1968) Les crustacés captures par la ‘Thalassa’ au large des côtes nord-ouest africaines. Revue Roumanie de Biologie (Série de Zoologie) 13, 479493.Google Scholar
Mavidis, M., Türkay, M. and Koukouras, A. (2008) The genera Atergatis, Microcassiope, Monodaeus, Paractea, Paragalene, and Xantho (Decapoda, Xanthidae) in the Mediterranean Sea. Crustaceana 81, 10351053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynou, F. and Cartes, J.E. (2000) Community structure of bathyal decapod crustaceans off south-west Balearic Islands (western Mediterranean): seasonality and regional patterns in zonation. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 80, 789798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melville Smith, R. (1988) The commercial fishery for and population dynamics of red crab Geryon maritae off South West Africa, 1976–1986. South African Journal of Marine Sciences 6, 7995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menzies, R.J., George, R.Y. and Rowe, G.T. (1973) Abyssal environment and ecology of the world oceans. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Metin, C., Gökçe, G., Aydin, I. and Bayramiç, I. (2009) Bycatch reduction in trammel net fishery for prawn (Melicertus kerathurus) by using guarding net in İzmir bay on Aegean Coast of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 9, 133136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miers, E.J. (1881) On a Collection of Crustacea made by Baron Hermann Maltzam [sic] at Goree Island, Senegambia. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 5 8, 204220, 259–281, 364–377, plates 13–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne-Edwards, A. (1880) Reports on the results of dredging, under the supervision of Alexander Agassiz, in the Gulf of Mexico, and in the Caribbean Sea, 1877, ’78, ’79, by the U. S. Coast Survey Steamer “Blake”, Lieut.-Commander C.D. Sigsbee, U.S.N., and Commander J.R. Bartlett, U.S.N., commanding. VIII. Études préliminaires sur les Crustacés. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College 8: 168, plates 1–2.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, A. (1883) Receuil de figures de crustacés nouveaux ou peu connus. Expedition du Travailleur, 3 pp, plates 1–44.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, A. and Bouvier, E.-L. (1897) Crustacés nouveaux provenant des campagnes du Travailleur et du Talisman. Bulletin du Muséum d'Histoire naturelle, Paris, 1er série 3, 297301.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, A. and Bouvier, E.-L. (1898) Crustacés provenant des campagnes du Travailleur et du Talisman. Bulletin du Muséum d'Histoire naturelle, Paris, 1er série 4, 152154.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, A. and Bouvier, E.-L. (1899) Crustacés décapodes provenant des campagnes de l'Hirondelle (supplément) et de la Princesse-Alice (1891–1897). Résultats des Campagnes Scientifiques accompliés sur son Yacht par Albert Ier Prince Souverain de Monaco 13, 1106.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, A. and Bouvier, E.-L. (1900) Crustacés décapodes. Première partie. Brachyures et Anomoures. In Milne-Edwards, A. (ed.) Expéditions scientifiques du Travailleur et du Talisman pendant les années 1880, 1881, 1882, 1883. Paris: Masson, pp. 1396, 32 pls.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, H. (1853) Memoire sur la famille des Ocypodiens, suite. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, series 3 (Zoology) 20, 163228, plates 6–11.Google Scholar
Modena, M., Mori, M. and Vacchi, M. (2001) Note su alcuni crostacei malacostraci raccolti in aree adiacenti alla M/C Haven (Mar Ligure). Biologia Marina Mediterranea 8, 675679.Google Scholar
Monod, T. (1933) Sur quelques Crustacés de l'Afrique occidentale (liste des Décapodes Mauritaniens et des Xanthidés ouest-Africains). Bulletin du Comité d’Études Historiques et Scientifiques de l'Afrique Occidentale Française 15[1932], 456548.Google Scholar
Monod, T. (1946) Sur la présence du genre Acanthocarpus dans l'Atlantique oriental. Publicaçoes do Instituto de Zoologia do Porto 32, 78, figs 1–4, 1 plate.Google Scholar
Monod, T. (1956) Hippidea et Brachyura ouest-africains. Mémoires de l'Institut Français d'Afrique Noire 45, 1674, Figures 1–884, Tables 1–10.Google Scholar
Monteiro, P., Araújo, A., Erzini, K. and Castro, M. (2001) Discards of the Algarve (southern Portugal) crustacean trawl fishery. Hydrobiologia 449, 267277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, I., García-Isarch, E., Sobrino, I., Burgos, C., Funny, R. and González-Porto, M. (2012) Distribution, abundance and assemblages of decapod crustaceans in waters off Guinea-Bissau (north-west Africa). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 92, 475494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mura, M. and Cau, A. (2002) Occurrence of a rare deep-sea crab, Cymonomus granulatus (Norman, 1873) (Decapoda, Brachyura), in the Sardinian Channel. Crustaceana 75, 11331139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutlu, E. and Ergev, M.B. (2008) Spatio-temporal distribution of soft-bottom epibenthic fauna on the Cilician shelf (Turkey), Mediterranean Sea. Revista de biología tropical 56, 19191946.Google ScholarPubMed
Neudecker, T., Schiefenhövel, K., Kehlert, T. and Becker, K.-H. (2011) On the occurrence of angular crab (Goneplax rhomboides, Linnaeus 1758) in the German Bight, North Sea. Marine Biodiversity 41, 555561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, P.K.L., Guinot, D. and Davie, P.J.F. (2008) Systema Brachyorum: Part I. An annotated checklist of the extant Brachyuran crabs of the world. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology Supplement Series 17, 1286.Google Scholar
Ng, P.K.L., Wang, C.-H., Ho, P.-H. and Shih, H.-T. (2001) An annotated checklist of brachyuran crabs from Taiwan (Crustacea: Decapoda). National Taiwan Museum Special Publication Series 11, 186.Google Scholar
Olivi, G. (1792) Catalogo ragionato degli Animali del Golfo e delle Lagune di Venezia; preceduto da una Dissertazione sulla Storia fisica e naturale del Golfo; e accompagnato da Memorie, ed Osservazioni di Fisica Storia naturale ed Economia. Zoologia Adriatica, Bassano, xxxii+334 pp, pls. 1–9.Google Scholar
Ortmann, A.E. (1892) Die Decapoden-Krebse des Strassburger Museums, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der von Herrn Dr. Döderlein bei Japan und bei den Liu-Kiu-Inseln gesammelten und zur Zeit im Strassburger Museum aufbewahrten Formen. V Theil. Die Abtheilungen Hippidea, Dromiidea und Oxystomata. Zoologische Jahrbücher. Abtheilung für Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Thiere 6, 532588.Google Scholar
Ortmann, A.E. (1893) Die Decapoden-Krebse des Strassburger Museums, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der von Herrn Dr. Döderlein bei Japan und bei den Liu-Kiu-Inseln gesammelten und zur Zeit im Strassburger Museum aufbewahrten Formen. VII. Theil. Abtheilung: Brachyura (Brachyura genuina Boas) II. Unterabtheilung: Cancroidea, 2. Section: Cancrinea, 1. Gruppe: Cyclometopa. Zoologische Jahrbücher. Abteilung für Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Thiere 7, 411495, plate 17.Google Scholar
Pastor, M.V., Pelegrí, J.L., Hernández-Guerra, A., Font, J., Salat, J. and Emelianov, M. (2008) Water and nutrient fluxes off Northwest Africa. Continental Shelf Research 28, 915936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennant, T. (1777) Crustacea, mollusca, testacea. British zoology, Volume 4. London: White, 154 pp, 93 pls.Google Scholar
Pielou, E.C. (1992) Biogeography. Malabar: Krieger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Pipitone, C. and Arculeo, M. (2003) The marine Crustacea Decapoda of Sicily (central Mediterranean Sea): a checklist with remarks on their distribution. Italian Journal of Zoology 70, 6978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pipitone, C. and Tumbiolo, M.L. (1993) Decapod and stomatopod crustaceans from the trawlable bottoms of the Sicilian Channel (central Mediterranean Sea). Crustaceana 65, 358364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pipitone, C. and Vaccaro, A.M. (2011) Crustacea Decapoda from Ustica (southern Tyrrhenian Sea): species distribution in different habitats and sampling approach. In Pessani, D., Tirelli, T. and Froglia, C. (eds) IX Colloquium Crustacea Mediterranea Torino, Spetember 2–6, 2008. Torino: Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali, pp. 413434.Google Scholar
Politou, C.-Y., Maiorano, P., D'Onghia, G. and Mytilineou, C. (2005) Deep-water decapod crustacean fauna of the Eastern Ionian Sea. Belgian Journal of Zoology 135, 235241.Google Scholar
Porporato, E.M.D., de Domenico, F., Mangano, M.C., Rinelli, P. and Spanò, N. (2012) Ebalia nux (Decapoda, Brachyura) found among the leaves of Pteroeides spinosum (Anthozoa, Octocorallia). Crustaceana 85, 125128.Google Scholar
Risso, A. (1816) Histoire naturelle des Crustacés des environs de Nice. Paris: Librairie Grecque-Latine-Allemande, 175 pp., pl. 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossetti, I., Sartor, P., Francesconi, B., Mori, M. and Belcari, P. (2006) Biological aspects of Medorippe lanata (Linnaeus, 1767) (Brachyura: Dorippidae) from the Eastern Ligurian Sea (Western Mediterranean). Hydrobiologia 557, 2129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roux, P. (1828–1830) Crustacés de la Méditerranée et de son littoral. Décrits et Lithographiés par Polydore Roux, Conservateur du Cabinet d'histoire naturelle de la Ville de Marseille. Paris, 174 [unnumbered] pp, plates 1–10 [1828], plates 11–15 [1829], plates 16–45 [1830].Google Scholar
Saint Laurent, M. de (1980) Sur la classification et la phylogénie des Crustacés Décapodes Brachyoures. I. Podotremata Guinot, 1977 et Eubrachyura sect. nov. Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l'Académie des sciences, série D 290, 12651268.Google Scholar
Samouelle, G. (1819) The entomologist's useful compendium; or an introduction to the knowledge of British insects, comprising the best means of obtaining and preserving them, and a description of the apparatus generally used; together with the genera of Linné, and the modern method of arranging the classes Crustacea, Myriapoda, Spiders, Mites and Insects, from their affinities and structure, according to the views of Dr. Leach; also an explanation of the terms used in entomology; a calendar of the times of appearance and usual situations of near 3,000 species of British insects; with instructions for collecting and fitting up objects for the microscope. London, 496 pp., 12 pls.Google Scholar
Sánchez, F., Serrano, A., Parra, A., Ballesteros, M. and Cartes, J.E. (2008) Habitat characteristics as determinant of the structure and spatial distribution of epibenthic and demersal communities of Le Danois Bank (Cantabrian Sea, N Spain). Journal of Marine Systems 72, 6486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez-Jerez, P., Barberá-Cebrián, C. and Ramos-Esplá, A.A. (2000) Influence of the structure of Posidonia oceanica (Linnaeus) Delile, 1813 meadows modified by bottom trawling on crustacean assemblages: comparison of amphipods and decapods. Scientia Marina 64, 319326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sardà, F., Company, J.B. and Castellón, A. (2003) Intraspecific aggregation structure of a shoal of a western Mediterranean (Catalan coast) deep-sea shrimp, Aristeus antennatus (Risso, 1816), during the reproductive period. Journal of Shellfish Research 22, 569579.Google Scholar
Sartor, P., Francesconi, B., Rossetti, I. and de Ranieri, S. (2006) Catch composition and damage incurred to crabs discarded from the Eastern Ligurian Sea ‘rapido’ trawl fishery. Hydrobiologia 557, 121133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serrano, A., Sánchez, F. and García-Castrillo, G. (2006) Epibenthic communities of trawlable grounds of the Cantabrian Sea. Scientia Marina 70(S1), 149159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serrano, A., Sánchez, F., Punzón, A., Velasco, F. and Olaso, I. (2011) Deep sea megafaunal assemblages off the northern Iberian slope related to environmental factors. Scientia Marina 75, 425437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soto, L.A. (1991) Faunal zonation of the deep-water brachyuran crabs in the Straits of Florida. Bulletin of Marine Science 49, 623637.Google Scholar
Stephenson, W. and Campbell, B. (1960) The Australian portunids (Crustacea: Portunidae) IV: Remaining genera. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 11, 73122, plates 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimpson, W. (1871) Preliminary report on the Crustacea dredged in the Gulf Stream in the Straits of Florida, by L.F. de Pourtales, Assist. U. S. Coast Survey. Part I. Brachyura. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College 2, 109160.Google Scholar
Stramma, L. and Schott, F. (1999) The mean flow field of the tropical Atlantic Ocean. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 46, 279303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, S.H. (2004) A systematic revision of the Parthenopidae (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura) . PhD thesis. Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 730 pp.Google Scholar
Tan, S.H. and Low, M.E. (2014) The Mediterranean and Eastern Atlantic species of Spinolambrus Tan & Ng, 2007: S. macrochelos (Herbst, 1790), S. notialis (Manning & Holthuis, 1981) and S. verrucosus (Studer, 1883), with a note on the identity of Lambrus spinosissimus Osório, 1923 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Parthenopidae). Zootaxa 3753, 96100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tan, S.H. and Ng, P.K.L. (2007) Descriptions of new genera from the subfamily Parthenopinae (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Parthenopidae). Raffles Bulletin of Zoology Supplement 16, 95119.Google Scholar
Thomson, C.W. (1873) The depths of the sea. An account of the general results of the dredging cruises of H. M.S.S. Porcupine and Lightning during the summers of 1868, 1869 and 1870, under the scientific direction of Dr Carpenter, F. R. S., J. Gwyn Jeffreys, F. R. S., and Dr Wyville Thomson, F. R. S. London: Macmillan, 527 pp.Google Scholar
Trenkel, V.M., Le Loc'h, F. and Rochet, M.J. (2007) Small-scale spatial and temporal interactions among benthic crustaceans and one fish species in the Bay of Biscay. Marine Biology 151, 22072215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Türkay, M. (1975) Zur Kenntnis der Gattung Euchirograpsus mit Bemerkungen zu Brachygrapsus and Litocheira (Crustacea: Decapoda). Senckenbergiana Biologica 52, 103132.Google Scholar
Ungaro, N., Marano, C.A., Ceriola, L. and Martino, M. (2005) Distribution of demersal crustaceans in the southern Adriatic Sea. Acta Adriatica 46, 2740.Google Scholar
Van Soest, R.W.M. (1993) Distribution of sponges on the Mauritanian continental shelf. Hydrobiologia 258, 95106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, T. (2005) Quelques Crustacés rares en Manche – Stomatopodes et Décapodes – Des collections du Muséum d'histoire naturelle du Havre (Normandie, France): Rissoides desmaresti, Nephrops norvegicus et Goneplax rhomboides . Bulletin de la Société géologique de Normandie et des amis du Muséum du Havre 92, 2332.Google Scholar
Weber, F. (1795) Nomenclator entomologicus secundum entomologiam systematicam ill. Fabricii, adjectis speciebus recens detectis et varietatibus. Chilonii et Hamburg, C.E. Bohn, pp. i–viii, 1–171.Google Scholar
Wood-Mason, J. and Alcock, A. (1891) Natural History Notes from H.M. Indian Marine Survey Steamer ‘Investigator,’ Commander R. F. Hoskyn, R. N., commanding.— No. 21. Note on the Results of the last Season's Deep-sea Dredging. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 6 7, 119, 186–202, 258–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaldwyn, J.C. and Webber, W.R. (2011) Annotated checklist of New Zealand Decapoda (Anthropoda: Crustacea). Tuhinga 22, 171272.Google Scholar
Zariquiey Álvarez, R. (1948) Decapodos españoles I. Formas mediterraneas nuevas o interesantes. Revista Española de Entomología 24, 257309.Google Scholar
Zariquiey Álvarez, R. (1968) Crustáceos Decápodos Ibéricos. Investigación Pesquera 32, 1510.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Map 1. Sampling area showing the location of the MAURIT stations with presence of brachyurans.

Figure 1

Table 1. Data of the MAURIT stations: date, coordinates, bathymetric range and captured species.

Figure 2

Fig. 1. Homola barbata (Fabricius, 1793), ovigerous female CL: 21.11 mm dorsal view, MU281.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Paromola cuvieri (Risso, 1816), adult: (A) dorsal view, MUBV03; (B) frontal view, MU140.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Cymonomus granulatus (Norman, in Thomson, 1873), adult dorsal view, MUBV10.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Acanthocarpus brevispinis Monod, 1946, adult dorsal view, MU51.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Calappa pelii Herklots, 1851, female CL: 33.94 mm dorsal view, MU158.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Atelecyclus rotundatus (Olivi, 1792), female CL: 27.64 mm dorsal view, MUBV10.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Medorippe lanata (Linnaeus, 1767), ovigerous female CL: 23.68 mm dorsal view, MUBV01.

Figure 9

Fig. 8. Ethusa rosacea A. Milne Edwards & Bouvier, 1897, ovigerous female CL: 11.16 mm dorsal view, MUBV17.

Figure 10

Fig. 9. Ethusa rugulosa A. Milne-Edwards & Bouvier, 1897, adult male dorsal view, MUBV21.

Figure 11

Fig. 10. Goneplax barnardi (Capart, 1951), male CL: 20.01 mm dorsal view, MUBV09.

Figure 12

Fig. 11. Goneplax rhomboides (Linnaeus, 1758), male CL: 13.06 mm dorsal view, MU143.

Figure 13

Fig. 12. Ebalia nux Norman in A. Milne-Edwards, 1883, male CL: 7.02 mm dorsal view, MUBV10.

Figure 14

Fig. 13. Pseudomyra mbizi Capart, 1951, adult dorsal view, MUBV01.

Figure 15

Fig. 14. Pisa armata (Latreille, 1803), female CL: 22.12 mm dorsal view, MU139.

Figure 16

Fig. 15. Inachus aguiarii Brito Capello, 1876, ovigerous female CL: 11.36 mm, MU277: (A) general dorsal view; (B) ventral view, detail of sternal callosities.

Figure 17

Fig. 16. Inachus angolensis Capart, 1951, adult dorsal view, MUBV01.

Figure 18

Fig. 17. Inachus grallator Manning & Holthuis, 1981, male CL: 6.91 mm, MUBV10, in ethanol: (A) general dorsal view; (B) dorsal carapace detail. Scale bars: (A) 1 cm; (B) 1 mm.

Figure 19

Fig. 18. Inachus leptochirus Leach, 1817, MUBV10: (A) adult general view; (B) male CL: 12.42 mm, in alcohol, carapace dorsal view; (C) same ventral view. Scale bars: B, C, 1 mm.

Figure 20

Fig. 19. Inachus nanus Manning & Holthuis, 1981, ovigerous female CL: 6.72 mm, MU166, in ethanol, dorsal view. Scale bar 1 mm.

Figure 21

Fig. 20. Macropodia gilsoni (Capart, 1951), ovigerous female CL: 14.35 mm, MUBV21: (A) general dorsal view; (B) dorsal carapace detail.

Figure 22

Fig. 21. Macropodia hesperiae Manning & Holthuis, 1981, male CL: 6.48 mm, MU119, in ethanol, dorsal view. Scale bar 1 mm.

Figure 23

Fig. 22. Macropodia longipes (A. Milne-Edwards and Bouvier, 1899), male CL: 7.45 mm MU277, dorsal view. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Figure 24

Fig. 23. Macropodia macrocheles (A. Milne-Edwards & Bouvier, 1898): (A) male CL: 8.86 mm dorsal view, MU184; (B) ovigerous female CL: 5.17 mm, MU141, in ethanol, dorsal view; (C) same, epistome detail. Scale bars B, C: 1 mm.

Figure 25

Fig. 24. Eurynome aspera (Pennant, 1777), male CL: 10.35 mm dorsal view, MU209.

Figure 26

Fig. 25. Distolambrus maltzami (Miers, 1881), ovigerous female CL: 8.08 mm, MUBV21, in ethanol, dorsal view. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Figure 27

Fig. 26. Solenolambrus noordendei (Capart, 1951), ovigerous female CL: 9.04 mm dorsal view, MU233.

Figure 28

Fig. 27. Spinolambrus notialis (Manning & Holthuis, 1981), ovigerous female CL: 10.08 mm dorsal view, MU131.

Figure 29

Fig. 28. Liocarcinus corrugatus (Pennant, 1777), male CL: 13.07 mm, MUBV08: (A) dorsal view; (B) same, in ethanol; (C) dorsal carapace, in alcohol. Scale bars: B, 1 cm; C, 1 mm.

Figure 30

Fig. 29. Chaceon maritae (Manning & Holthuis, 1981): (A) adult dorsal view, MU243; (B) juvenile CL: 21.94 mm dorsal view, MU177.

Figure 31

Fig. 30. Bathynectes piperitus Manning & Holthuis, 1981, male CL: 13.60 mm dorsal view, MU123.

Figure 32

Fig. 31. Macropipus rugosus (Doflein, 1904), ovigerous female CL: 23.43 mm dorsal view, MUBV01.

Figure 33

Fig. 32. Monodaeus cristulatus Guinot & Macpherson, 1988: (A) medium size specimen, CL ~ 5 mm dorsal view, MUBV10; (B) male CL: 14.08 mm dorsal view, MUBV14; (C) same in ethanol.

Figure 34

Fig. 33. Monodaeus couchii (Couch, 1851), males: (A) CL: 22.11 mm dorsal view; (B) same, right pereiopods P3, P4, P5 detail; (C) CL: 16.09 mm dorsal view; (D) same, right pereiopods P2 to P5 detail. Monodaeus cristulatus Guinot & Macpherson, 1988, males: (E) CL: 12.02 mm dorsal view; (F) same, right pereiopods P2 to P5 detail; (G) CL: 8.36 mm dorsal view; (H) same, left pereiopods P2 to P5 detail. (A, B) ICMD 291/1981(s01); (C, D) ICMD000013; (E, F) MU212, UVIGO/03087; (G, H) MUBV10, UVIGO/11948. Scale bars: A, C, E, G, 1 cm; B, D, F, H, 1 mm.

Figure 35

Fig. 34. Euchirograpsus liguricus H. Milne-Edwards, 1853, male CL: 20.68 mm dorsal view, MUBV14.

Figure 36

Fig. 35. Depth records of brachyuran species. Translucent continuous line from MAURIT surveys, dotted line from the literature.