Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T15:02:49.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental investigation of fast electron transport in solid density matter: Recent results from a new technique of X-ray energy-encoded 2D imaging

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2009

L. Labate*
Affiliation:
Intense Laser Irradiation Laboratory, IPCF, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Pisa, Italy Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa, Italy Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Frascati, Italy
E. Förster
Affiliation:
Institut für Optik und Quantenelektronik, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena, Germany
A. Giulietti
Affiliation:
Intense Laser Irradiation Laboratory, IPCF, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Pisa, Italy Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa, Italy
D. Giulietti
Affiliation:
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa, Italy Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Frascati, Italy Dipartimento di Fisica, Universitá di Pisa, Italy
S. Höfer
Affiliation:
Institut für Optik und Quantenelektronik, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena, Germany
T. Kämpfer
Affiliation:
Institut für Optik und Quantenelektronik, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena, Germany
P. Köster
Affiliation:
Intense Laser Irradiation Laboratory, IPCF, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Pisa, Italy Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa, Italy
M. Kozlova
Affiliation:
Department of X-ray Lasers, PALS Centre-Institute of Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
T. Levato
Affiliation:
Intense Laser Irradiation Laboratory, IPCF, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Pisa, Italy Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Frascati, Italy
R. Lötzsch
Affiliation:
Institut für Optik und Quantenelektronik, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena, Germany
A. Lübcke
Affiliation:
Institut für Optik und Quantenelektronik, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena, Germany
T. Mocek
Affiliation:
Department of X-ray Lasers, PALS Centre-Institute of Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
J. Polan
Affiliation:
Department of X-ray Lasers, PALS Centre-Institute of Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
B. Rus
Affiliation:
Department of X-ray Lasers, PALS Centre-Institute of Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
I. Uschmann
Affiliation:
Institut für Optik und Quantenelektronik, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena, Germany
F. Zamponi
Affiliation:
Institut für Optik und Quantenelektronik, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena, Germany
L.A. Gizzi
Affiliation:
Intense Laser Irradiation Laboratory, IPCF, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Pisa, Italy Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa, Italy Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Frascati, Italy
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: L. Labate, Intense Laser Irradiation Laboratory, IPCF, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Pisa, Italy. E-mail: luca.labate@ipcf.cnr.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The development activity of a new experimental technique for the study of the fast electron transport in high density matter is reported. This new diagnostic tool enables the X-ray 2D imaging of ultrahigh intensity laser plasmas with simultaneous spectral resolution in a very large energy range to be obtained. Results from recent experiments are discussed, in which the electron propagation in multilayer targets was studied by using the Kα. In particular, results highlighting the role of anisotropic Bremsstrahlung are reported, for the sake of the explanation of the capabilities of the new diagnostics. A discussion of a test experiment conceived to extend the technique to a single-shot operation is finally given.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

1. INTRODUCTION

The issue of fast electron transport in high-density matter is currently receiving growing attention, both from a theoretical (Bret & Deutsch, Reference Bret and Deutsch2006; Deutsch et al., Reference Deutsch, Bret, Firpo, Gremillet, Lefebvre and Lifschitz2008a, Reference Deutsch, Bret, Firpo, Gremillet, Lefebvre and Lifschitz2008b; Evans, Reference Evans2006; Honrubia et al., Reference Honrubia, Alfonsìn, Alonso, Pèrez and Cerrada2006, Reference Honrubia, Antonicci and Moreno2004) and an experimental viewpoint (Batani, Reference Batani2002; Nakamura et al., Reference Nakamura, Sakagami, Johzaki, Nagatomo and Mima2006), even in view of its crucial role in the fast ignitor approach to the inertial confinement fusion (ICF) (Atzeni, Reference Atzeni1999; Kodama et al., Reference Kodama, Norreys, Mima, Dangor, Evans, Fujita, Kitagawa, Krushelnick, Miyakoshi, Miyanaga, Norimatsu, Rose, Shozaki, Shigemori, Sunahara, Tampo, Tanaka, Toyama, Yamanaka and Zepf2001; Sakagami et al., Reference Sakagami, Johzaki, Nagatomo and Mima2006; Sherlock et al., Reference Sherlock, Bell and Rozmus2006; Tabak et al., Reference Tabak, Hammer, Glinsky, Kruer, Wilks, Woodworth, Campbell and Perry1994). Indeed, as it is well known, within this scheme, the ignition of a small hot spot, having linear dimensions on the order of 10 µm, in the pre-compressed DT fuel is expected to be reached by means of the energy deposition by a high-current (well beyond the Alfvèn limit) beam of relativistic electrons, with kinetic energy E k ≳ 1 MeV (Tabak et al., Reference Tabak, Clark, Hatchett, Key, Lasinski, Snavely, Wilks, Town, Stephens, Campbell, Kodama, Mima, Tanaka, Atzeni and Freeman2005). As it came out during the last few years, the propagation of such a high current beam, which would ideally have to occur through the compressed, high-density plasma, cannot be described by simple collisional, “Bethe-Bloch like” models. Indeed, the role played by the self-generated electric and magnetic fields cannot be neglected (Batani, Reference Batani2002; Bell et al., Reference Bell, Davies, Guerin and Ruhl1997; Davies, Reference Davies2004). As it is known, this leads, as an example, to the need of a return current in order for the propagation to occur over the required distances, as well as to self-pinching effects of the electron beam. Moreover, the instabilities of the fast electron beam in the presence of the cold electron return current, such as e.g., the filamentation instability (Gremillet et al., Reference Gremillet, Bonnaud and Amiranoff2002), should be considered.

From an experimental point of view, the investigation of the fast electron transport in high density matter is mostly performed by irradiating solid targets. In this field, the main diagnostics is the Kα emission spectroscopy, eventually from ad hoc fluorescent tracer layers, which is routinely performed by using bent (spherical or toroidal) Bragg crystals coupled either to X-ray film (or image plates) or to charge coupled device (CCD) cameras (Baton et al., Reference Baton, Koenig, Fuchs, Benuzzi-Mounaix, Guillou, Loupias, Vinci, Gremillet, Rousseaux, Drouin, Lefebvre, Dorchies, Fourment, Santos, Batani, Morace, Redaelli, Nakatsutsumi, Kodama, Nishida, Ozaki, Norimatsu, Aglitskiy, Atzeni and Schiavi2008; Köster et al., Reference Köster, Akli, Batani, Baton, Evans, Giulietti, Giulietti, Gizzi, Green, Koenig, Labate, Morace, Norreys, Perez, Waugh, Woolsey and Lancaster2009; Labate et al., Reference Labate, Galimberti, Giulietti, Giulietti, Gizzi, Köster, Laville and Tomassini2004, Reference Labate, Galimberti, Giulietti, Giulietti, Köster, Tomassini and Gizzi2007a; Lancaster et al., Reference Lancaster, Green, Hey, Akli, Davies, Clarke, Freeman, Habara, Key, Kodama, Krushelnick, Murphy, Nakatsutsumi, Simpson, Stephens, Stoeckl, Yabuuchi, Zepf and Norreys2007). Bent crystals allow the spectrum and a one-dimensional (1D) image of an X-ray source to be simultaneously obtained, with resolving power λ/Δλ~103 and spatial resolution down to a few µm, mainly dependent on the detector used (Faenov et al., Reference Faenov, Magunov, Pikuz, Skobelev, Giulietti, Betti, Galimberti, Gamucci, Giulietti, Gizzi, Labate, Levato, Tomassini, Marques, Bourgeois, Dobosz Dufrenoy, Ceccotti, Monot, Reau, Popescu, D'Oliveira, Martin, Fukuda, Boldarev, Gasilov and Gasilov2008; Labate et al., Reference Labate, Cecchetti, Galimberti, Giulietti, Giulietti and Gizzi2005; Nishimura et al., Reference Nishimura, Kawamura, Matsui, Ochi, Okihara, Sakabe, Koike, Johzaki, Nagatomo, Mima, Uschmann and Förster2003; Young et al., Reference Young, Osterheld, Price, Sheperd, Stewart, Faenov, Magunov, Pikuz, Skobelev, Flora, Bollanti, Lazzaro, Letardi, Grilli, Palladino, Reale, Scafati and Reale1998). As an alternative, two-dimensional (2D) images of the source, with the same figure for the spatial resolution, can be obtained at a fixed photon wavelength.

While allowing a very high spectral resolution to be obtained, bent Bragg crystals suffer from a low diffraction efficiency (Missalla et al., Reference Missalla, Uschmann, Förster, Jenke and von der Linde1999). Moreover, a fundamental issue about the ultimate signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio comes from the fluorescence and Compton radiation produced by the crystal when exposed to hard X-rays, as well as to X-ray radiation due to the interaction of high energy particles with the crystal itself. It is clear that this issue deserves careful consideration in the case of ultrahigh intensity laser-plasma interaction experiments related to ICF.

A basic feature of bent crystals is the small spectral range available for a given configuration (i.e., in a given shot). This is of course related to their high dispersing power and to the high spectral resolution achievable. However, this can be an important limitation when, e.g., the Kα emission from both cold and ionized particles has to be simultaneously observed (King et al., Reference King, Akli, Snavely, Zhang, Key, Chen, Chen, Hatchett, Koch, MacKinnon, Patel, Phillips, Town, Freeman, Borghesi, Romagnani, Zepf, Cowan, Stephens, Lancaster, Murphy, Norreys and Stoeckl2005). For the same reason, Bremsstrahlung continuum radiation is also very difficult to study using Bragg crystals. Furthermore, this demands for the use of different crystals for different tracer layers, i.e., different elements. It is worthwile to cite at this point that a new concept diagnostics has been recently developed, consisting of a flat Bragg crystal coupled to a pinhole array. Monochromatic X-ray images of an ICF target at different X-ray wavelength in a narrow range from about 3.5 to 4.1 keV have been simultaneously recorded in this way (Tommasini et al., Reference Tommasini, Koch, Izumi, Welser, Mancini, Delettrez, Regan and Smalyuk2006).

All of the above issues must be taken into account in the design of experiments devoted to the investigation of fast electron transport in ICF relevant conditions. Indeed, the development of new kinds of diagnostics is an important aspect for the projects pursuing the fast ignition approach, such as the HiPER project (HiPER project, 2008). We observe here that recent advances have been reported in the field of the diagnostic tools for the mixed space and time-resolved investigation of the X-ray emission from plasmas in ICF relevant conditions, based upon new concept streak-camera devices (Huang et al., Reference Huang, Nakai, Shiraga, Azechi, Huang, Ding and Zheng2006; Zhong et al., Reference Zhong, Shiraga and Azechi2008).

In this paper, we report on the results of some recent experiments devoted to the development of a new experimental technique for the X-ray imaging of laser plasmas. The technique is based upon the use of a CCD detector operating in the single-photon regime, coupled to a pinhole. As it is well known, CCD detectors allow, when operating in the single-photon regime, the X-ray spectrum of the impinging radiation to be retrieved, without any external energy dispersing device, basically due to the linear relationship between the X-ray photon energy and the released (and collected) charge (Labate et al., Reference Labate, Levato, Galimberti, Giulietti, Giulietti, Sanna, Traino, Lazzeri and Gizzi2008; Levato et al., Reference Levato, Labate, Galimberti, Giulietti, Giulietti and Gizzi2008; Zamponi et al., Reference Zamponi, Kämpfer, Morak, Uschmann and Förster2005). CCD detectors in such a configuration have been used for a long time in laser-plasma experiments to get an X/γ-ray spectrum over a broad range (Beg et al., Reference Beg, Bell, Dangor, Danson, Dews, Glinsky, Hammel, Lee, Norreys and Tatarakis1997; Gizzi et al., Reference Gizzi, Giulietti, Giulietti, Audebert, Bastiani, Geindre and Mysyrowicz1996; Key et al., Reference Key, Adam, Akli, Borghesi, Chen, Evans, Freeman, Habara, Hatchett, Hill, Heron, ad King, Kodama, Lancaster, MacKinnon, Patel, Phillips, Romagnani, Snavely, Stephens, Stoeckl, Townn, Toyama, Zhang, Zepf and Norreys2008; Stoeckl et al., Reference Stoeckl, Theobald, Sangster, Key, Patel, Zhang, Clarke, Karsch and Norreys2004). If a pinhole is inserted between the source and the detector, each detected X-ray photon, whose energy can be retrieved according to the above considerations, also keeps an encoded 2D spatial information on its origin (or, viceversa, one can think to a 2Dimage with an encoded energy information), so that one has a sort of single-photon pinhole camera. By collecting a sufficient number of photons, it is thus possible to get simultaneously the 2D images of the source at any photon energy in the sensitive range of the CCD detector (Levato et al., Reference Levato, Labate, Galimberti, Giulietti, Giulietti and Gizzi2008), provided that a sufficient number of photons in the desired energy bin has been collected.

From a practical point of view, this can be accomplished either by relying on a large number of acquisitions (that is, laser shots) in the same experimental conditions or by using a large number of pinholes (in other words, using a large number of “single-photon pinhole cameras” at the same time, each of them using a different region of the same CCD detector). Only the second approach is applicable on a single-shot basis and can be used at low-repetition rate laser facilities. In what follows, we give an outline of some recent experiments carried out by our group using the first approach (that is, using the technique on a multi-shot basis) and then we briefly show some results from an ad hoc experiment devoted to extend our technique to single-shot operation.

2. THE TYPICAL EXPERIMENTAL SETUP AND A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE TECHNIQUE

The first experiment using our new technique of X-ray energy-encoded 2D imaging was carried out at the IOQ-Jena facility with the “JeTi” Ti:sapphire laser system, providing 70 fs duration pulses with an energy of 600 mJ at a repetition rate of 10 Hz.

Figure 1 shows a sketch of the typical experimental setup inside the vacuum chamber. The laser pulse was focused onto the surface of solid targets by means of a 45°, f/1.2 off-axis parabola (OAP), at an angle incidence of about 10°. The spot size was about 5 μm2 and the maximum intensity about 5×1019 W/cm2 (a 0 = eA L/m ec 2 ≃ 4.8). The figure shows two identical single-photon pinhole cameras, looking at the target from different directions. Each pinhole camera consisted of a 5 µm diameter pinhole coupled to a back-illuminated, cooled X-ray CCD camera. In this particular experiment, each pinhole was bored in a 25 µm thick Pt substrate. Two deep-depletion Andor DX420 CCD cameras were used, whose chips were cooled down to −65°C in order to reduce the thermal noise due to the dark current. The pixel size for such a CCD model is 26×26 µm2 and the magnification of our pinhole cameras was M≃10. These values lead to an estimate for the ultimate spatial resolution of about 5 µm, limited by the pinhole size. In the experiment of Figure 1, due to the vacuum chamber size, the CCD cameras were put outside of the main chamber, each of them in its own separate small vacuum chamber, and 50 µm thick kapton foils were used as X-ray transparent windows.

Fig. 1. (Color online) Sketch of the typical experimental setup used in our experiments.

As it is visible in the figure, the whole path from the pinhole to the CCD (actually, in this case, to the vacuum flange) was shielded by 1 cm thick lead tubes. Moreover, inside these tubes, along their whole length, a set of small magnets was put, producing an estimated field of about 0.3 T at the tube center, in order to prevent high-energy charged particles from reaching the CCD chip or the filters in front of it. The CCD body was also shielded by some millimeters thick lead. These kinds of shielding are of crucial importance when the CCD has to be operated in the single-photon regime, in particular in ultrahigh intensity experiments (Stoeckl et al., Reference Stoeckl, Theobald, Sangster, Key, Patel, Zhang, Clarke, Karsch and Norreys2004).

The details of the technique and the data analysis can be found in Labate et al. (Reference Labate, Giulietti, Giulietti, Köster, Levato, Gizzi, Zamponi, Lübcke, Kämpfer, Uschmann and Förster2007b). We only mention here that the CCD is forced to operate in the single-photon regime by using a large number of thin mylar foils in front of it. In the case of the experiment to which Figure 1 refers (that is, with an X-ray source size of about 10 µm, a magnification factor M≃10, and a pixel size 26×26 µm2), a few tens of photons per shot were detected. By summing up the “single-photon images” of about 350 laser shots (after a center-of-mass retrieving algorithm correction taking care of the possible target displacement from shot to shot (Labate et al., Reference Labate, Giulietti, Giulietti, Köster, Levato, Gizzi, Zamponi, Lübcke, Kämpfer, Uschmann and Förster2007b)) an energy-encoded 2D image of the X-ray source was obtained, having a spatial resolution of 5 µm and a spectral resolution of about 150 eV, typical of single-photon CCD spectrometers (Bootsma et al., Reference Bootsma, van Zwet, Brinkman, den Herder, de Jong, de Korte and Olsthoorn2000). In other words, beside the X-ray spectrum in a range extending over a few tens of keV (that is, over the detector useful range), 2D images are reconstructed at any photon energy within this range, integrated over an energy interval comparable to the energy resolution. We will show in the next section some experimental results.

3. APPLICATION TO THE STUDY OF FAST ELECTRON TRANSPORT AND X-RAY EMISSION IN MULTILAYER TARGETS

As anticipated in the introduction, the most direct way of studying the propagation of high-current electron beams in high-density matter is the Kα spectroscopy with spatial resolution (Freeman et al., Reference Freeman, Anderson, Hill, King, Snavely, Hatchett, Key, Koch, MacKinnon, Stephens and Cowan2003; Nishimura et al., Reference Nishimura, Kawamura, Matsui, Ochi, Okihara, Sakabe, Koike, Johzaki, Nagatomo, Mima, Uschmann and Förster2003). In such a context, a major, standard class of experiments makes use of Kα fluorescent multilayer targets, whose Kα emission from the different tracer layers allows the propagation of the fast electrons to be followed at different depths inside the target. It is worthwile observing at this point that the study of the Kα emission from thin solid targets also deserves its own interest in view of the optimization of Kα based ultrashort, and ultraintense X-ray sources for applications. In this section, we show some results obtained using our new imaging technique, aiming to illustrate how it can be employed in the context of fast electron transport studies.

Figure 2 (left) shows the X-ray spectrum in the 4–10 keV range from a three layer target (Ti-mylar-Cu) irradiated with the laser pulse whose parameters have been given in Section 2. The spectrum was retrieved by using our technique after 350 laser shots. Figure 2 (right) shows instead the 2D image of the emitting source at the Ti and Cu Kα/β energy; in other words, the upper (lower) image is obtained by summing up the contributions from only those photons at the Ti (Cu) Kα or Kβ energy. We notice here that our technique is not limited to image out the source only at selected photon energies corresponding to emission lines. In principle, an image of the X-ray source can be retrieved at any wavelength range, provided a sufficient number of photons has been collected in that range. It is thus clear that the Bremsstrahlung emission can be studied in this way and the corresponding absolute photon flux can be retrieved. This is an important feature of the technique, even in view of the fact that the Bremsstrahlung emission is related to the fast electron beam transport (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Zhang, Li, Teng, Liang, Sheng, Dong, Zhao, Wei and Tang2001; Norreys et al., Reference Norreys, Santala, Clark, Zepf, Watts, Beg, Krushelnick, Tatarakis, Dangor, Fang, Graham, McCanny, Singhal, Ledingham, Creswell, Sanderson, Magill, Machacek, Wark, Allott, Kennedy and Neely1999; Sentoku et al., Reference Sentoku, Mima, Taguchi, Miyamoto and Kishimoto1998).

Fig. 2. (Color online) X-ray spectrum (left) and energy resolved X-ray images at two different photon energies (right) of a Ti-mylar-Cu multilayer target irradiated at an intensity of 5×1019 W/cm2, as obtained with the diagnostics discussed in the text from 350 laser shots. The two images on the right both have a size of 200×200 µm (on the object plane) and are not comparable to each other as for the color scale.

In order to highlight the role of the Bremsstrahlung emission on our X-ray measurements, we observe that we found in most of our experiments a systematic difference between the sizes of the same source (that is, the source at a given energy) as seen from the front and from the back side of the target (even after a correction for eventual different viewing angles). Our observations suggest an underlying non-isotropic emission process involved. As an example, we consider the simple case of a one layer Ti thin target. The X-ray source at the Ti Kα energy as seen from the back side of the target appeared to be larger (by a factor ~2–3, for foil thicknesses between 5 and 25 µm) than the same source as seen from the front side.

A possible explanation for this difference comes from Figure 3, showing the emission spectrum around the Ti Kα line as seen from the front (a) and the back (b) side of the target. For each viewing direction, different spectra are reported, obtained considering photons coming from regions at different distances from the source center (defined as the point where the maximum of the emission occurs). The plots clearly show that a continuum spectral component contributes to the observed emission at the Kα energy on the front side (Fig. 3a). Furthermore, this component comes from a small region around the source center. Based upon previously published literature (Li et al., Reference Li, Yuan, Xu, Zheng, Sheng, Chen, Ma, Liang, Yu, Zhang, Liu, Wang, Wei, Zhao, Jin and Zhang2006; Sentoku et al., Reference Sentoku, Mima, Taguchi, Miyamoto and Kishimoto1998; Sheng et al., Reference Sheng, Sentoku, Mima, Zhang, Yu and Meyer-ter Vehn2000), this emission has been attributed to directional electron Bremsstrahlung occurring on the front side of the target (Zamponi et al., Reference Zamponi, Lübcke, Kämpfer, Uschmann, Förster, Giulietti, Giulietti, Köster, Labate, Levato and Gizzi2009).

Fig. 3. (Color online) X-ray spectrum of a 5 µm thick Ti foil irradiated at an intensity of 5 × 1019 W/cm2, as observed from the front (a) and from the back (b) side of the target (both at an angle of 45° with respect to the target surface). For each case, the spectra reconstructed by adding up the contributions from photons coming from different anular regions of the source are shown. The different regions are identified by the distance (radius) from the source center (defined as the point where the maximum of the X-ray emission occurs). The pixel size was 26 × 26 µm2 and the magnification was M ≃ 10.

4. A TEST EXPERIMENT TOWARD A SINGLE-SHOT ENERGY-ENCODED 2D IMAGING

Due to the requirement for the single-photon condition to be fulfilled and to the need for a sufficient photon statistics, the diagnostic approach as described above requires a large number of laser shots. Its use in ICF relevant experiments at low repetition rate facilities thus requires an ad hoc extension to a single-shot operation. A possibility toward this goal is offered by the recent large area CCD detectors, which allow a large number of “single-photon images,” separated in space on the detector plane, to be acquired. In other words, an array of closely spaced pinholes is used instead of a single pinhole. The resulting data can then be brought back to the case of a single pinhole once the position on the CCD detector of the centers of the images relative to the different pinholes are known.

A technique for the production of the pinhole array has been recently developed at our laboratory, which allowed us to make a pinhole array by tightly focusing the frequency doubled beam of a TiSa 0.2 TW laser system onto a 100 µm thick W foil. Figure 4 shows a SEM image of the pinhole array, showing very good shaped nearly cilindrical holes with a diameter of about 5–7 µm. The array holds a total of 20×20 pinholes on a nearly rectangular grid with 60 µm spacing. A test experiment has been carried out at the PALS laboratory in Prague, where the 3rd harmonic of the PALS iodine laser (λ ≃ 0.438 µm) has been focused on a thick Ti target at an intensity of about 2×1014 W/cm2. Figure 4 (right) shows, as an example, the image of the X-ray source at the Ti Kα/β photon energy as obtained with our technique from a singe shot, showing a source size of about 30 µm. It should be noted here that, when the source size d s is not considerably smaller than the pinhole distance d ph, an overlapping between the images coming from neighboring pinholes may actually affect the retrieved image. Due to this issue, the image size of the shown figure is actually the largest that one could get with the pinhole array shown. This issue can be clearly addressed by using a larger spacing pinhole array. Thus, the validity of the condition d s ≪ d ph should be preliminarly assessed in order to safely employing such a diagnostic technique. In other words, the choice of the pinhole distance has to be carefully chosen using a preliminary, rough estimate of the source size.

Fig. 4. (Color online) (left) SEM image of a pinhole array made from a 100 µm thick W substrate. A close view of a single pinhole is also shown. (right) Energy resolved X-ray image at the Ti Kα/β photon energy of a Ti thick target irradiated at an intensity of about 2×1014 W/cm2. The image has a size of 60×60 µm in the object plane.

5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

The development of new experimental tools for the simultaneous X-ray imaging and spectroscopy of laser-matter interaction at ultrahigh intensity is an important issue in the field of the fast ignition. A new technique for the X-ray 2D imaging with simultaneous spectral resolution has been developed. The technique described here is based upon the scheme of a simple X-ray pinhole camera, which further exploits the CCD detector capability to provide the spectrum of the incoming radiation when operating in the single-photon regime. Some experiments devoted to the study of the fast electron transport in solid density matter have been successfully carried out, whose results have been reported here in order to illustrate the new technique.

The diagnostics is now being extended to single shot operation, by using an approach based upon a pinhole array coupled to a large area CCD detector. A test experiment has been carried out, which showed the feasibility of such an approach.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The Pisa authors wish to acknowledge support from the Italian MIUR projects FISR “Impianti innovativi multiscopo per la produzione di radiazione X ed ultravioletta,” FIRB “BLISS – Broadband Laser for ICF Strategic Studies,” and “SPARX” and PRIN “Studio della generazione e della propagazione di elettroni rapidi”. The Pisa group also acknowledge support from the INFN project “PLASMONX” and the EU FP7 program “HiPER”. We acknowledge support from the Deutsche Forshungsgemeinschaft for the financial support. The access to the Jena and to the Prague facilities was granted by the LASERLAB initiative of the EU FP6.

References

REFERENCES

Atzeni, S. (1999). Inertial fusion fast ignitor: Igniting pulse parameter window vs the penetration depth of the heating particles and the density of the precompressed fuel. Phys. Plasmas 6, 33163326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batani, D. (2002). Transport in dense matter of relativistic electron produced in ultra-high-intensity laser interactions. Laser Part. Beams 20, 321336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baton, S.D., Koenig, M., Fuchs, J., Benuzzi-Mounaix, A., Guillou, P., Loupias, B., Vinci, T., Gremillet, L., Rousseaux, C., Drouin, M., Lefebvre, E., Dorchies, F., Fourment, C., Santos, J.J., Batani, D., Morace, A., Redaelli, R., Nakatsutsumi, M., Kodama, R., Nishida, A., Ozaki, N., Norimatsu, T., Aglitskiy, Y., Atzeni, S. & Schiavi, A. (2008). Inhibition of fast electron energy deposition due to preplasma filling of cone-attached targets. Phys. Plasma 15, 042706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beg, F.N., Bell, A.R., Dangor, A.E., Danson, C.N., Dews, A.P., Glinsky, M.E., Hammel, B.A., Lee, P., Norreys, P.A. & Tatarakis, M. (1997). A study of picosecond laser-solid interactions up to 1019 W/cm−2. Phys. Plasmas 4, 447457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, A.R., Davies, J.R., Guerin, S. & Ruhl, H. (1997). Fast-electron transport in high-intensity short-pulse laser-solid experiments. Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion 39, 653659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bootsma, T.M.V., van Zwet, E.J., Brinkman, A.G., den Herder, J.W., de Jong, L., de Korte, P. & Olsthoorn, S.M. (2000). Synchrotron calibration and response modelling of back-illuminated xmm-rgs ccds. Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A 439, 575581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bret, A. & Deutsch, C. (2006). Density gradient effects on beam plasma linear instabilities for fast ignition scenario. Laser Part. Beams 24, 269273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, L.M., Zhang, J., Li, Y.T., Teng, H., Liang, T.J., Sheng, S.M., Dong, Q.L., Zhao, L.Z., Wei, Z.Y. & Tang, X.W. (2001). Effects of laser polarization on jet emission of fast electrons in femtosecond-laser plasmas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 225001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, J.R. (2004). Alfvèn limit in fast ignition. Phys. Rev. E 69, 065402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deutsch, C., Bret, A., Firpo, M.C., Gremillet, L., Lefebvre, E. & Lifschitz, A. (2008 a). Onset of coherent electromagnetic structures in the relativistic electron beam deuterium-tritium fuel interaction of fast ignition concern. Laser Part. Beams 26, 157165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, C., Bret, A., Firpo, M.C., Gremillet, L., Lefebvre, E. & Lifschitz, A. (2008 b). Onset of coherent electromagnetic structures in the relativistic electron beam deuterium-tritium fuel interaction of fast ignition concern. Laser Part. Beams 26, 507–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R.G. (2006). Modelling short pulse, high intensity laser plasma interactions. Hi. Ener. Density Phys. 2, 3547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faenov, A.Y., Magunov, A.I., Pikuz, T.A., Skobelev, I.Y., Giulietti, D., Betti, S., Galimberti, M., Gamucci, A., Giulietti, A., Gizzi, L.A., Labate, L., Levato, T., Tomassini, P., Marques, J.R., Bourgeois, N., Dobosz Dufrenoy, S., Ceccotti, T., Monot, P., Reau, F., Popescu, H., D'Oliveira, P., Martin, P., Fukuda, Y., Boldarev, A.S., Gasilov, S.V. & Gasilov, V.A. (2008). Non-adiabatic cluster expansion after ultrashort laser interaction. Laser Part. Beams 26, 6982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R., Anderson, C., Hill, J.M., King, J., Snavely, R., Hatchett, S., Key, M., Koch, J., MacKinnon, A., Stephens, R. & Cowan, T. (2003). Understanding the role of fast electrons in the heating of dense matter: Experimental techniques and recent results. J Quant. Spectr. Rad. Trans 81, 183190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gizzi, L.A., Giulietti, A., Giulietti, D., Audebert, P., Bastiani, S., Geindre, J.P. & Mysyrowicz, A. (1996). Simultaneous measurements of hard X-rays and second-harmonic emission in fs laser-target interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 22782281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gremillet, L., Bonnaud, G. & Amiranoff, F. (2002). Filamented transport of laser-generated relativistic electrons penetrating a solid target. Phys. Plasma 9, 941948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honrubia, J.J., Alfonsìn, C., Alonso, L., Pèrez, B. & Cerrada, J.A. (2006). Simulations of heating of solid targets by fast electrons. Laser Part. Beams 24, 217222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honrubia, J.J., Antonicci, A. & Moreno, D. (2004). Hybrid simulations of fast electron transport in conducting media. Laser Part. Beams 22, 129135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, T.X., Nakai, M., Shiraga, H., Azechi, H., Huang, T.X., Ding, Y.K. & Zheng, Z.J. (2006). Ultrafast X-ray imaging with sliced sampling streak cameras. Rev. Sci. Instr. 77, 026105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, M.H., Adam, J.C., Akli, K.U., Borghesi, M., Chen, M.H., Evans, R.G., Freeman, R.R., Habara, H., Hatchett, S.P., Hill, J.M., Heron, A.ad King, J.A., Kodama, R., Lancaster, K.L., MacKinnon, A.J., Patel, P., Phillips, T., Romagnani, L., Snavely, R.A., Stephens, R., Stoeckl, C., Townn, T., Toyama, Y., Zhang, B., Zepf, M. & Norreys, P.A. (2008). Fast ignition relevant study of the flux of high-intensity laser-generated electrons via a hollow cone into a laser-imploded plasma. Phys. Plasmas 15, 022701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J.A., Akli, K., Snavely, R.A., Zhang, B., Key, M.H., Chen, C.D., Chen, M., Hatchett, S.P., Koch, J.A., MacKinnon, A.J., Patel, P.K., Phillips, T., Town, R.P.J., Freeman, R.R., Borghesi, M., Romagnani, L., Zepf, M., Cowan, T., Stephens, R., Lancaster, K.L., Murphy, C.D., Norreys, P. & Stoeckl, C. (2005). Characterization of a picosecond laser generated 4.5 KeV Ti K-alpha source for pulsed radiography. Rev. Sci. Instr. 76, 076102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kodama, R., Norreys, P.A., Mima, K., Dangor, A.E., Evans, R.G., Fujita, H., Kitagawa, Y., Krushelnick, K., Miyakoshi, T., Miyanaga, N., Norimatsu, T., Rose, S.J., Shozaki, T., Shigemori, K., Sunahara, A., Tampo, M., Tanaka, K.A., Toyama, Y., Yamanaka, T. & Zepf, M. (2001). Fast heating of ultrahigh-density plasma as a step towards laser fusion ignition. Nat. 412, 798802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Köster, P., Akli, K., Batani, D., Baton, S., Evans, R.G., Giulietti, A., Giulietti, D., Gizzi, L.A., Green, J.S., Koenig, M., Labate, L., Morace, A., Norreys, P., Perez, F., Waugh, J., Woolsey, N. & Lancaster, K.L. (2009). Experimental investigation of fast electron transport through Kα imaging and spectroscopy in relativistic laser-solid interactions. Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion 51, 014007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labate, L., Cecchetti, C.A., Galimberti, M., Giulietti, A., Giulietti, D. & Gizzi, L.A. (2005). Detailed characterization of the early X-ray emission of a plasma produced by point-like laser irradiation of solid Al targets. Phys. Plasma 12, 083101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labate, L., Galimberti, M., Giulietti, A., Giulietti, D., Gizzi, L.A., Köster, P., Laville, S. & Tomassini, P. (2004). Ray-tracing simulations of a bent crystal X-ray optics for imaging using laser-plasma X-ray sources. Laser Part. Beams 22, 253259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labate, L., Galimberti, M., Giulietti, A., Giulietti, D., Köster, P., Tomassini, P. & Gizzi, L.A. (2007 a). Study of forward accelerated fast electrons in ultrashort Ti Kα sources. Appl. Phys. B 86, 229233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labate, L., Giulietti, A., Giulietti, D., Köster, P., Levato, T., Gizzi, L.A., Zamponi, F., Lübcke, A., Kämpfer, T., Uschmann, I. & Förster, E. (2007 b). Novel X-ray multispectral imaging of ultraintense laser plasmas by a single-photon charge coupled device based pinhole camera. Rev. Sci. Instr. 78, 103506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Labate, L., Levato, T., Galimberti, M., Giulietti, A., Giulietti, D., Sanna, M., Traino, C., Lazzeri, M. & Gizzi, L.A. (2008). A single-photon ccd-based setup for in situ measurement of the X-ray spectrum of mammographic units. Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A 594, 278282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, K.L., Green, J.S., Hey, D.S., Akli, K.U., Davies, J.R., Clarke, R.J., Freeman, R.R., Habara, H., Key, M.H., Kodama, R., Krushelnick, K., Murphy, C.D., Nakatsutsumi, M., Simpson, P., Stephens, R., Stoeckl, C., Yabuuchi, T., Zepf, M. & Norreys, P.A. (2007). Measurements of energy transport patterns in solid density laser plasma interactions at intensities of 5×1020 W/cm−2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 125002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levato, T., Labate, L., Galimberti, M., Giulietti, A., Giulietti, D. & Gizzi, L.A. (2008). Detailed analysis of events from high-energy X-ray photons impinging on a two-phase front-illuminated ccd. Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A 592, 346353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y.T., Yuan, X.H., Xu, M.H., Zheng, Z.Y., Sheng, Z.M., Chen, M., Ma, Y.Y., Liang, W.X., Yu, Q.Z., Zhang, Y., Liu, F., Wang, Z.H., Wei, Z.Y., Zhao, W., Jin, Z. & Zhang, J. (2006). Observation of a fast electron beam emitted along the surface of a target irradiated by intense femtosecond laser pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 165003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Missalla, T., Uschmann, I., Förster, E., Jenke, G. & von der Linde, D. (1999). Monochromatic focusing of subpicosecond X-ray pulses in the kev range. Rev. Sci. Instr. 70, 12881299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, T., Sakagami, H., Johzaki, T., Nagatomo, H. & Mima, K. (2006). Generation and transport of fast electrons inside cone targets irradiated by intense laser pulses. Laser Part. Beams 24, 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishimura, H., Kawamura, T., Matsui, R., Ochi, Y., Okihara, S., Sakabe, S., Koike, F., Johzaki, T., Nagatomo, H., Mima, K., Uschmann, I. & Förster, E. (2003). Kα spectroscopy to study energy transport in ultrahigh-intensity laser produced plasmas. J. Quan. Spectr. Rad. Trans. 81, 327337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norreys, P.A., Santala, M., Clark, E., Zepf, M., Watts, F., Beg, F.N., Krushelnick, K., Tatarakis, M., Dangor, A.E., Fang, X., Graham, P., McCanny, T., Singhal, R.P., Ledingham, K.W.D., Creswell, A., Sanderson, D.C.W., Magill, J., Machacek, A., Wark, J., Allott, R., Kennedy, B. & Neely, D. (1999). Observation of a highly directional γ-ray beam from ultrashort, ultraintense laser pulse interactions with solids. Phys. Plasma 6, 21502156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakagami, H., Johzaki, T., Nagatomo, H. & Mima, K. (2006). Fast ignition integrated interconnecting code project for cone-guided targets. Laser Part. Beams 24, 191198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sentoku, Y., Mima, K., Taguchi, T., Miyamoto, S. & Kishimoto, Y. (1998). Particle simulation on X-ray emissions from ultra-intense laser produced plasmas. Phys. Plasma 5, 43664372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheng, Z.M., Sentoku, Y., Mima, K., Zhang, J., Yu, W. & Meyer-ter Vehn, J. (2000). Angular distributions of fast electron, ions, and bremsstrahlung X/γ-rays in intense laser interaction with solid targets. Physi. Revi. Lett. 85, 53405343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherlock, M., Bell, A.R. & Rozmus, W. (2006). Absorption of ultra-short laser pulses and particle transport in dense targets. Laser Part. Beams 24, 231234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoeckl, C., Theobald, W., Sangster, T.C., Key, M.H., Patel, P., Zhang, B.B., Clarke, R., Karsch, S. & Norreys, P. (2004). Operation of a single-photon-counting X-ray charge-coupled device camera spectrometer in a petawatt environment. Rev. Sci. Instr. 75, 37053707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabak, M., Clark, D.S., Hatchett, S.P., Key, M.H., Lasinski, B.F., Snavely, R.A., Wilks, S.C., Town, R.P.J., Stephens, R., Campbell, E.M., Kodama, R., Mima, K., Tanaka, K.A., Atzeni, S. & Freeman, R. (2005). Review of progress in fast ignition. Phys. Plasma 12, 057305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabak, M., Hammer, J., Glinsky, M.E., Kruer, W.L., Wilks, S.C., Woodworth, J., Campbell, E.M. & Perry, M.D. (1994). Ignition and high gain with ultrapowerful lasers. Phys. Plasma 1, 16261634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tommasini, R., Koch, J.A., Izumi, N., Welser, L.A., Mancini, R.C., Delettrez, J., Regan, S. & Smalyuk, V. (2006). Multispectral X-ray imaging for core temperature and density maps retrieval in direct drive implosions. Rev. Sci. Instr. 77, 10E303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, B.K.F., Osterheld, A.L., Price, D.F., Sheperd, R., Stewart, R.E., Faenov, A.Y., Magunov, A.I., Pikuz, T.A., Skobelev, I.Y., Flora, F., Bollanti, S., Lazzaro, P.D., Letardi, T., Grilli, A., Palladino, L., Reale, A., Scafati, A. & Reale, L. (1998). High-resolution X-ray spectrometer based on spherically bent crystals for investigations of femtosecond laser plasmas. Rev. Sci. Instr. 69, 40494053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamponi, F.A., Lübcke, A., Kämpfer, T., Uschmann, I., Förster, E., Giulietti, A., Giulietti, D., Köster, P., Labate, L., Levato, T. & Gizzi, L.A. (2009). Directional bremsstrahlung from a Ti laser-produced X-ray source at relativistic intensities in the 3–10 KeV range. Phys. Rev. Lett.Google Scholar
Zamponi, F., Kämpfer, T., Morak, A., Uschmann, I. & Förster, E. (2005). Characterization of a deep depletion, back-illuminated charge-coupled device in the X-ray range. Rev. Sci. Instr. 76, 116101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, J., Shiraga, H. & Azechi, H. (2008). One-dimensional and multichannels multi-imaging X-ray streak camera for imploded core plasma of shell-cone target. Rev. Sci. Instr. 79, 10E907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (Color online) Sketch of the typical experimental setup used in our experiments.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (Color online) X-ray spectrum (left) and energy resolved X-ray images at two different photon energies (right) of a Ti-mylar-Cu multilayer target irradiated at an intensity of 5×1019 W/cm2, as obtained with the diagnostics discussed in the text from 350 laser shots. The two images on the right both have a size of 200×200 µm (on the object plane) and are not comparable to each other as for the color scale.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. (Color online) X-ray spectrum of a 5 µm thick Ti foil irradiated at an intensity of 5 × 1019 W/cm2, as observed from the front (a) and from the back (b) side of the target (both at an angle of 45° with respect to the target surface). For each case, the spectra reconstructed by adding up the contributions from photons coming from different anular regions of the source are shown. The different regions are identified by the distance (radius) from the source center (defined as the point where the maximum of the X-ray emission occurs). The pixel size was 26 × 26 µm2 and the magnification was M ≃ 10.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. (Color online) (left) SEM image of a pinhole array made from a 100 µm thick W substrate. A close view of a single pinhole is also shown. (right) Energy resolved X-ray image at the Ti Kα/β photon energy of a Ti thick target irradiated at an intensity of about 2×1014 W/cm2. The image has a size of 60×60 µm in the object plane.