Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T10:54:38.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Incidental diagnosis of four pulmonary arteriovenous fistulas during patent foramen ovale closure: a case report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2020

Alessandro Andreis*
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126Turin, Italy
Gabriella Agnoletti
Affiliation:
Pediatric Cardiology Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino Hospital, 10126Turin, Italy
Paolo Scacciatella
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126Turin, Italy
*
Author for correspondence: Alessandro Andreis, Division of Cardiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Bramante 88, 10126Turin, Italy. Tel: +390116335538. E-mail: alessandro.andreis@unito.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cryptogenic cerebral ischemia in young patients is commonly ascribed to paradoxical embolism. We report the clinical case of a young patient with cryptogenic stroke and a patent foramen ovale, undergoing percutaneous closure of atrial septal defect. Contrast transoesophageal echocardiography at the end of the procedure demonstrated massive late residual right-to-left shunt, due to the coexistence of pulmonary arteriovenous fistulas that were subsequently closed. Routinary adoption of contrast transoesophageal echocardiography at the end of patent foramen ovale closure interventions may be useful to detect early and late residual shunts. Late residual shunts may be due to pulmonary fistulas, a well-known risk factor for recurrent thromboembolic events.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Cryptogenic cerebral ischemia in young people is often ascribed to paradoxical embolism through atrial septal defects, such as patent foramen ovale, whose prevalence in the general population is approximately 26%.Reference Meier and Lock1 A rare cause of paradoxical embolism is the presence of a pulmonary arteriovenous fistula whose estimated prevalence in the general population is 2–3 per 100,000.Reference Alqoofi, Tyrrell and Feldman2 In young patients with cryptogenic cerebral ischemia, the prevalence of patent foramen ovale rises up to 46%,Reference Meier and Lock1 while a pulmonary arteriovenous fistula, isolated or associated with a patent foramen ovale, may be found in up to 15%.Reference Alqoofi, Tyrrell and Feldman2

Contrast transoesophageal echocardiography may be useful for right-to-left shunt identification in patients with cryptogenic cerebral ischemia. Contrast appearance in the left atrium within three cardiac cycles following complete opacification of the right atrium is supposed to distinguish an intracardiac from an extracardiac shunt.Reference Saric, Armour and Arnaout3 In high-risk patients with patent foramen ovale suffering cryptogenic cerebral ischemia, septal defect closure is a safe and effective alternative to medical treatment.Reference Pristipino, Sievert and D’Ascenzo4 Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography is usually performed to guide the correct placement of the septal occluder device, while contrast transoesophageal echocardiography at the end of the procedure is not routinary performed.

Case report

A 26-year-old man referred to our Emergency Department complaining motor aphasia in the morning (lasted about 1 hour) followed by migraine with aura. On arrival, he was eupneic, apiretic, with normal pulse oximetry (97%), regular heart rate (65 beats per minute), and bilateral blood pressure of 100/70 mmHg. Physical examination was normal. He was then admitted to the neurology ward for further diagnostic tests. Medical history collection revealed perinatal stroke, previous seizures, recurrent migraine, and a patent foramen ovale, diagnosed the year before by transesophageal echocardiography. Cranial CT scan and MRI were performed and revealed recent ischemic, embolic lesions in the left temporal and frontal cerebral lobe. Additional diagnostic tests were performed to exclude other causes of cerebral ischemia. Carotid Doppler, lower limbs venous ultrasound, electrocardiogram, 24-hour Holter monitoring and laboratory tests were normal.

The evidence of stroke in a patient with previously known patent foramen ovale strongly suggested paradoxical embolism. He was diagnosed with patent foramen ovale-related stroke and he was therefore planned for percutaneous closure of septal defect.

Pre-procedural contrast transoesophageal echocardiography (performed with a Vivid 7 Dimension ultrasound machine, General Electric Healthcare, Norfolk, VA, USA) showed a massive early right-to-left shunt through patent foramen ovale. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale was performed using standardised techniques,Reference Meier5,Reference Diaz, Cubeddu and Rengifo-Moreno6 with transoesophageal echocardiography guidance. Balloon-sizing was avoided in order to prevent septal damage. An 18-mm Amplatzer patent foramen ovale occluder (St Jude Medical, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was implanted.

At the end of the procedure, contrast transoesophageal echocardiography (Fig 1A) revealed correct placement of the device with resolution of the early right-to-left shunt, though a persistent and significant late shunt was still evident, with left atrial opacification after five cardiac cycles following right atrial opacification. Since a pulmonary arteriovenous fistula was suspected, an agitated saline injection in the pulmonary trunk was performed, showing left atrial opacification. A CT angiogram was later performed and showed four pulmonary arteriovenous fistulas in the left lung inferior lobe (Fig 1C). The patient underwent percutaneous closure of three pulmonary arteriovenous fistulas (Fig 1B) with embolisation coils. The fourth pulmonary fistula was left untreated because of the inability to access the target site (located in a peripheral position in the superior lobe) and the small size of the lesion (<4 mm). At 6-month follow-up, the patient was asymptomatic, without further episodes of cerebral ischemia. The three pulmonary arteriovenous fistulas were completely closed on both pulmonary and CT angiogram (Fig 1 D/E), while contrast transoesophageal echocardiography showed a trivial residual shunt.

Figure 1. Patent foramen ovale closure with pulmonary arteriovenous fistulas detection and treatment. (a) Intraoperative contrast transoesophageal echocardiography showing correct deployment of the occluder device (OD) but persistence of late shunt (MB, microbubbles) in the left atrium. (b/c) Pulmonary/CT angiogram showing one of the four pulmonary arteriovenous fistulas before its percutaneous closure. (d) Post-procedural pulmonary angiogram showing closed pulmonary arteriovenous fistulas. (e) Six-month CT angiogram showing good results of pulmonary arteriovenous fistulas closure over time.

Discussion

Compared to medical therapy, percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects proved to be effective in the reduction of recurrent neurological events in patients with cryptogenic cerebral ischemia,Reference Pristipino, Sievert and D’Ascenzo4 especially in those with a higher RoPE score.Reference Thaler, Ruthazer and Weimar7 However, despite the significant reduction of risk in patients undergoing patent foramen ovale closure, recurrent ischemic stroke may occur in 5.1% patients, as shown in a recent study by Seeger et al.Reference Seeger, Uber and Wöhrle8 Incident atrial fibrillation is a well-known risk factor for recurrences.Reference Pristipino, Sievert and D’Ascenzo4 Indeed, the presence of undiagnosed pulmonary arteriovenous fistula may explain further ischemic events.Reference Balbi, Canepa, Cheli, Bezante and Brunelli9 Although unusual, contrast transoesophageal echocardiography at the end of patent foramen ovale closure interventions may be useful to detect early and late residual shunts. While early shunts may occur for unsatisfying device deployment, late shunts may be due to the presence of extracardiac shunts such as pulmonary arteriovenous fistula. This simple and safe practice can occasionally identify extracardiac right-to-left shunts that, if left untreated, might explain recurrent thromboembolic events in patients with a technically successful patent foramen ovale closure intervention.Reference Windecker, Wahl and Chatterjee10

Conclusions

In conclusion, the routinary adoption of contrast transoesophageal echocardiography at the end of interventions of patent foramen ovale closure may be useful to detect undiagnosed extracardiac shunt.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951120002152

Authors’ contributions

Alessandro Andreis: data collection, interpretation and analysis, article drafting, critical revision and approval of the final version. Gabriella Agnoletti: interventional cardiologist performing the latter percutaneous procedure described in the case report, interpretation and analysis of data, article drafting, critical revision and approval of the final version. Paolo Scacciatella: interventional cardiologist performing the two percutaneous procedures described in the case report, interpretation and analysis of data, article drafting, critical revision and approval of the final version.

Acknowledgements

None.

Financial Support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Ethical Standards

The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008, and has been approved by the institutional committee.

References

Meier, B, Lock, JE. Contemporary management of patent foramen ovale. Circulation 2003; 107: 59. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000046073.34261.C1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alqoofi, F, Tyrrell, B, Feldman, T.Diagnosis and therapy for pulmonary arteriovenous fistula in patients with presumed patent foramen ovale. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 75: 459464. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22260Google ScholarPubMed
Saric, M, Armour, AC, Arnaout, MS, et al.guidelines for the use of echocardiography in the evaluation of a cardiac source of embolism. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2016; 29: 142. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.09.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pristipino, C, Sievert, H, D’Ascenzo, F, et al.European position paper on the management of patients with patent foramen ovale. General approach and left circulation thromboembolism. Eur Heart J 2019; 40: 31823195. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy649CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meier, B.Catheter-based closure of the patent foramen ovale. Circulation. 2009; 120: 18371841. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.903427CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diaz, T, Cubeddu, RJ, Rengifo-Moreno, PA, et al.Management of residual shunts after initial percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure: a single center experience with immediate and long-term follow-up. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 76: 145150. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22475CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thaler, DE, Ruthazer, R, Weimar, C, et al.Recurrent stroke predictors differ in medically treated patients with pathogenic vs other PFOs. Neurology 2014; 83: 221226. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000589CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seeger, J, Uber, A, Wöhrle, J. Long-term outcome after percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale for cryptogenic ischemic events. J Invasive Cardiol 2019; 31: E242E248.Google ScholarPubMed
Balbi, M, Canepa, M, Cheli, M, Bezante, GP, Brunelli, C.Sometimes they come back: recurrent noncardiac right-to-left shunt after percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2017; 18: 443446. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328351dac0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Windecker, S, Wahl, A, Chatterjee, T, et al.percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in patients with paradoxical embolism long-term risk of recurrent thromboembolic events. Circulation 2000; 101: 893898. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.101.8.893CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Patent foramen ovale closure with pulmonary arteriovenous fistulas detection and treatment. (a) Intraoperative contrast transoesophageal echocardiography showing correct deployment of the occluder device (OD) but persistence of late shunt (MB, microbubbles) in the left atrium. (b/c) Pulmonary/CT angiogram showing one of the four pulmonary arteriovenous fistulas before its percutaneous closure. (d) Post-procedural pulmonary angiogram showing closed pulmonary arteriovenous fistulas. (e) Six-month CT angiogram showing good results of pulmonary arteriovenous fistulas closure over time.

Andreis et al. supplementary material

Andreis et al. supplementary material 1

Download Andreis et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 8.8 MB

Andreis et al. supplementary material

Andreis et al. supplementary material 2

Download Andreis et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 8.4 MB

Andreis et al. supplementary material

Andreis et al. supplementary material 3

Download Andreis et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 13.1 MB