Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T13:54:57.905Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false

Left atrial mass in children following cardiac surgery: unravelling the diagnosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2020

Saileela Rajan*
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, MIOT Centre for Children’s Cardiac Care, MIOT Hospitals, Chennai, India
Harish Chamundaiah
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, MIOT Centre for Children’s Cardiac Care, MIOT Hospitals, Chennai, India
Robert Coelho
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery, MIOT Centre for Children’s Cardiac Care, MIOT Hospitals, Chennai, India
*
Author for correspondence: S. Rajan, MD, DNB, FNB, Consultant Paediatric Cardiologist, MIOT Centre for Children’s Cardiac Care, MIOT Hospitals, 4/112, Mount Poonamallee High Road, Manapakkam, Chennai 600089, India. Tel: +91-9444881620; Fax: +91 4422491188. E-mail: drsaileelarajan@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The differential diagnosis of a left atrial mass on echocardiogram includes thrombus, vegetation, tumour, and other rare causes like septal aneurysm, pulmonary vein remnant, and septal haematoma. We present interesting echocardiographic images of a rare condition which can masquerade as a left atrial mass following cardiac surgery.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Case details

A 6-month-old female infant (patient 1), who underwent surgical closure of a sub-arterial ventricular septal defect, was found to have an echogenic mass in the left atrium (Fig 1a and b, Supplementary Videos 1 and 2) on post-operative transthoracic echocardiogram. The mass was arising from the lateral aspect of the left atrium and protruded towards the mitral orifice, without causing any obstruction to mitral inflow. Colour Doppler did not reveal any flow into the mass. Careful assessment of the lesion was performed in multiple echocardiographic views. Subcostal long-axis view clinched the diagnosis of left atrial appendage inversion (Fig 1c, Supplementary Video 3). The continuity of the left atrial wall with the inverted atrial appendage was clearly demonstrable in this view, which helped to differentiate this from left atrial thrombus. No active intervention was done. Though the lesion persisted on the echocardiogram performed at 3-month follow-up, there was complete disappearance of the lesion after 1 year. A similar image was noted in a 2-month-old male infant (patient 2) who underwent truncus arteriosus repair (Fig 2a). After confirming the diagnosis of left atrial appendage inversion, he was advised conservative management. Echocardiogram at 3-month follow-up revealed a significant decrease in the size of the lesion (Fig 2b). Subsequently, he was lost to follow-up and when seen after 2 years, the mass had disappeared suggesting complete resolution of the lesion (Fig 2c).

Figure 1. Echocardiographic images of patient 1. ( a ) Four-chamber view showing a large echogenic mass (white arrow) attached to the lateral wall of left atrium just above the mitral valve. ( b ) Parasternal long-axis view showing the echogenic mass in left atrium. ( c ) Subcostal long-axis view showing inverted left atrial appendage (white arrow). Note the continuity of the structure with left atrial wall. LA=left atrium, RA=right atrium.

Figure 2. Echocardiographic images of patient 2. ( a ) Four-chamber view showing a large echogenic mass (inverted appendage) in the left atrium attached to the lateral wall. ( b ) Echocardiogram at 3-month follow-up showing a significant reduction in the size of the mass. ( c ) Complete resolution noted at 2-year follow-up.

Discussion

Left atrial appendage inversion is a rare complication following cardiac surgery. Reference Allen, Ilbawi and Hartz1 This occurs due to the negative pressure created by the left atrial vent during surgery or during deairing procedures. Reference Cohen, Tamir and Yanai2,Reference Fujiwara, Naito and Noguchi3 There have been reports of left atrial appendage inversion in pericardial effusion, which could be due to the increased intrapericardial pressure. Reference Gecmen, Candan and Guler4 Spontaneous inversion of the left atrial appendage in the absence of above two situations is also reported. Reference Powell, Taylor and Cottrill5 If it is recognised during surgery in the post-operative transoesophageal echocardiogram, it may be corrected by digital manipulation. However, if it is recognised later, no intervention is required as spontaneous resolution occurs. Occasionally, if it causes haemodynamic compromise by obstructing the left ventricular inflow, intervention may be required. Reference Molaei, Tabib and Meraji6

In both our patients, transoesophageal echocardiogram was not performed intraoperatively as the weight of the infants was less than 5 kg. Thus, it went unnoticed in the immediate post-operative period. In both, left atrial vent was placed through the patent foramen ovale during surgery. The negative pressure caused by the vent was probably responsible for the inversion of the left atrial appendage. Thus, the appearance of a tubular mass protruding towards the mitral orifice with the absence of flow into it and having the same echodensity as the atrial wall is suggestive of left atrial appendage inversion. Though the lesion has a misleading appearance of a mass on the four-chamber and parasternal long-axis views; the subcostal views are diagnostic and clearly demonstrate the inversion of the appendage. Hence, we suggest a detailed subcostal echocardiographic examination when there is a new appearance of a left atrial mass following cardiac surgery. Cardiologists should be aware of this condition as recognition of this entity will avoid unnecessary investigations and unindicated treatment with anticoagulants.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951120003662

Acknowledgements

None.

Financial support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Ethical standards

The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national guidelines on human experimentation and with the Helsinki declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008, and has been approved by the institutional committees.

References

Allen, BS, Ilbawi, M, Hartz, R, et al. Inverted left atrial appendage: an unrecognized cause of left atrial mass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997; 114: 278280.Google Scholar
Cohen, AJ, Tamir, A, Yanai, O, et al. Inverted left atrial appendage presenting as a left atrial mass after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67: 14891491.Google Scholar
Fujiwara, K, Naito, Y, Noguchi, Y, et al. Inverted left atrial appendage: an unusual complication in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67: 14921494.Google Scholar
Gecmen, C, Candan, O, Guler, A, et al. Unusual left atrial mass: inverted left atrial appendage caused by massive pericardial effusion. Echocardiography 2011; 28: E134E136.Google Scholar
Powell, AW, Taylor, MD, Cottrill, CM, et al. Inversion of the left atrial appendage in an asymptomatic newborn without prior cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016; 17: 1438.Google Scholar
Molaei, A, Tabib, A, Meraji, M, et al. Inverted left atrial appendage: a cause of left ventricular inflow obstruction. Iran Cardiovasc Res J 2010; 4: 139141.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Echocardiographic images of patient 1. (a) Four-chamber view showing a large echogenic mass (white arrow) attached to the lateral wall of left atrium just above the mitral valve. (b) Parasternal long-axis view showing the echogenic mass in left atrium. (c) Subcostal long-axis view showing inverted left atrial appendage (white arrow). Note the continuity of the structure with left atrial wall. LA=left atrium, RA=right atrium.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Echocardiographic images of patient 2. (a) Four-chamber view showing a large echogenic mass (inverted appendage) in the left atrium attached to the lateral wall. (b) Echocardiogram at 3-month follow-up showing a significant reduction in the size of the mass. (c) Complete resolution noted at 2-year follow-up.

Rajan et al. supplementary material

Rajan et al. supplementary material 1

Download Rajan et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 1.3 MB

Rajan et al. supplementary material

Rajan et al. supplementary material 2

Download Rajan et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 1.2 MB

Rajan et al. supplementary material

Rajan et al. supplementary material 3

Download Rajan et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 1.2 MB