Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T22:34:08.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Helix advancement meatoplasty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2012

P W A Goodyear*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, University Hospital Aintree NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
C E Reddy
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, University Hospital Aintree NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
T H J Lesser
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, University Hospital Aintree NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr Paul W A Goodyear, Department of Otolaryngology, University Hospital Aintree NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK E-mail: paulgoodyear@btinternet.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We describe a new technique of helix advancement meatoplasty. This technique is useful in both mastoid surgery and some cases of otitis externa. The technique is designed to avoid the problems of (1) inferior positioning of the meatoplasty at the time of surgery, and (2) later inferior migration of the pinna (as can occur when the suspensory ligaments of the pinna have been cut or weakened). Such outcomes can result in a mastoid cavity which is difficult to clean as the approach to it is awkward; in such cases, it is common to have to look up into the cavity rather than directly into it. Helix advancement meatoplasty improves post-operative visualisation and aeration. It eases cleaning of the cavity by creating a more superiorly placed meatoplasty, which is supported by the tragus and is therefore less likely to drop.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2012

Introduction

Following tympanomastoid surgery, it is essential to create a large external auditory meatus in order to ensure a well-aerated, non-discharging cavity. An adequately sized meatus promotes a dry ear by allowing ventilation of an open cavity and facilitating the natural outward migration of squamous epithelium. It also facilitates easier post-operative access for cleaning the cavity in the out-patient clinic. Following mastoid surgery, the bony cavity extends as high as the tegmen tympani, but the meatoplasty is usually created lower than this, and migrates lower still with time.

Various meatoplasty techniques have been described.Reference Raut and Rutka1Reference Ali10 Most involve the creation of concho-meatal skin flaps and the debulking of soft tissue with cartilage excision. The disadvantage of many of these techniques is that they widen the meatus in its posterior and inferior parts, rather than superiorly where the attic has been opened. One is often looking up into the cavity, and access and cleaning can be challenging and uncomfortable for patients. Many old mastoid cavities need cleaning by laterally flexing the patient's neck to look up into the cavity.

Another issue is the inferior and anterior migration of the pinna in relation to the bony cavity, as a result of surgical disruption of the ligaments and muscles supporting the outer ear.

The pinna is attached to the skull by multiple ligaments and muscles. There are two main ligaments: the anterior and posterior ligament. The anterior ligament extends from the tragus and spina helicis to the root of the zygomatic process of the temporal bone. The posterior ligament passes from the posterior surface of the concha to the outer surface of the mastoid process. Attached to the auricular perichondrium are three extrinsic auricular muscles radiating out to insert into the epicranial aponeurosis.

Inferior and anterior migration of the ear can result from surgical disruption of these elements, particularly the suspensory ligaments of the ear. AliReference Ali10 described multiple factors associated with inferior migration of the pinna following ear surgery. These comprise: detachment of ligamentous support of the cartilaginous canal; loss of periosteal continuity; loss of ear canal continuity; drilling of the posterior bony canal; partial excision of ear cartilage; post-operative oedema; poor head bandage placement; and contraction of scar tissue and auricular cartilage.

The present paper presents a new, previously unpublished technique of helix advancement meatoplasty, which overcomes the problems of inferior positioning of the meatus and inferior migration of the pinna following tympanomastoid surgery. It allows the meatoplasty to be created at the level of the tegmen tympani, and to remain there.

Indications

Helix advancement meatoplasty was originally developed for ear surgery camps in developing countries, where large, dependable meatoplasties are of critical importance as patient follow up can be poor.

The authors do not suggest that this technique is necessary for every tympanomastoid procedure, but it is particularly useful in cases of revision mastoid surgery, keratitis obturans, refractory or chronically discharging mastoid cavities, and revision canaloplasty. The technique has also proved very useful in primary mastoidectomy cases in which the cavity formation is higher than normal, and in cases where there is likely to be further growth of the pinna.

Surgical technique

After completion of the mastoidectomy or canaloplasty, the following steps are performed (Figures 1 to 3).

Fig. 1 An inferiorly based, triangular piece of skin and soft tissue measuring approximately 0.8 × 1.6 cm is excised anterior to the root of the helix (step 1), thus ensuring that skin overlying the superior part of the tragus is also excised.

Fig. 2 The helix is released from the superior conchal bowl and the root of the helix is dissected from the surrounding soft tissues (step 2); it is then rotated anteriorly into the defect, and sutured to the tragus using 4/0 vicryl (step 3).

Fig. 3 A superior ellipse of conchal bowl and scaphoid fossa cartilage is excised (step 4) (this is higher than in the standard excision, which usually involves the conchal bowl only). The skin of the concho-meatal flap is placed into the mastoid cavity (step 5).

Firstly, an inferiorly based, triangular piece of skin and soft tissue is excised anterior to the root of the helix, measuring approximately 0.8 × 1.6 cm. Skin overlying the superior part of the tragus is also excised.

The helix is then released from the superior conchal bowl (it inserts into the concha, dividing it into the scaphoid fossa above and the conchal bowl below).

Next, the root of the helix is dissected from the surrounding soft tissues and rotated anteriorly into the defect and sutured to the tragus using 4/0 vicryl.

A superior ellipse of conchal bowl and scaphoid fossa cartilage is then excised. (This is higher than the standard excision, which usually involves mainly the conchal bowl.)

Following this, the skin of the concho-meatal flap is placed into the mastoid cavity.

Finally, the cavity is packed with ribbon gauze soaked in bismuth iodide paraffin paste. This is left in place for up to three weeks.

Advantages

Helix advancement meatoplasty prevents inferior meatal migration by supporting the helix on the tragus. This, together with the higher excision of the scaphoid fossa and the conchal bowl, enables a direct view into the mastoid cavity (Figure 4), facilitating easier aural toilet and superior cavity aeration.

Fig. 4 Post-operative photograph showing a direct view into the mastoid cavity. Very few patients are concerned with the cosmetic appearance.

Limitations

Patients may report some dissatisfaction with the cosmetic appearance of the pinna following the described procedure. However, this is also seen with other wide meatoplasties.Reference Ali10

Conclusion

The described technique of helix advancement meatoplasty is a predictable and reliable method of creating a wide, well-placed meatoplasty and overcoming later inferior migration of the meatus.

References

1Raut, VV, Rutka, JA. The Toronto meatoplasty: enhancing one's results in canal wall down procedures. Laryngoscope 2002;112:2093–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Fisch, U, Chang, P, Linder, T. Meatoplasty for lateral stenosis of the external auditory canal. Laryngoscope 2002;112:1310–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Rombout, J, van Rijn, PM. M-meatoplasty: results and patient satisfaction in 125 patients (199 ears). Otol Neurotol 2001;22:457–60CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Haapaniemi, J, Laurikainen, E, Suonpää, J. Radical meatoplasty in the treatment of severe chronic external otitis. J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2001;63:41–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Suskind, DL, Bigelow, CD, Knox, GW. Y modification of the Fisch meatoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;121:126–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Wormald, PJ, van Hasselt, CA. A technique of mastoidectomy and meatoplasty that minimizes factors associated with a discharging mastoid cavity. Laryngoscope 1999;109:478–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Mirck, PG. The M-meatoplasty of the external auditory canal. Laryngoscope 1996;106:367–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Grenner, J. How I do it: meatoplasty of the ear canal. J Otolaryngol 1996;25:188–90Google Scholar
9Stucker, FJ, Shaw, GY. Revision meatoplasty: management emphasizing de-epithelialized postauricular flaps. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;105:433–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Ali, MS. Unilateral secondary (acquired) postmastoidectomy low-set ear: postoperative complication with potential functional and cosmetic implications. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;38:240–5Google ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1 An inferiorly based, triangular piece of skin and soft tissue measuring approximately 0.8 × 1.6 cm is excised anterior to the root of the helix (step 1), thus ensuring that skin overlying the superior part of the tragus is also excised.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 The helix is released from the superior conchal bowl and the root of the helix is dissected from the surrounding soft tissues (step 2); it is then rotated anteriorly into the defect, and sutured to the tragus using 4/0 vicryl (step 3).

Figure 2

Fig. 3 A superior ellipse of conchal bowl and scaphoid fossa cartilage is excised (step 4) (this is higher than in the standard excision, which usually involves the conchal bowl only). The skin of the concho-meatal flap is placed into the mastoid cavity (step 5).

Figure 3

Fig. 4 Post-operative photograph showing a direct view into the mastoid cavity. Very few patients are concerned with the cosmetic appearance.