Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T19:41:15.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cartography as a Tool of Colonization: Sir Humphrey Gilbert’s 1583 Voyage to North America*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Nate Probasco*
Affiliation:
Briar Cliff University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An analysis of Sir Humphrey Gilbert’s 1583 expedition to North America, which was England’s first attempt at colonization beyond Britain, shows that the nation’s earliest expansionists perceived the significance of maps in supporting colonization. Gilbert recruited several specialists, including John Dee and Richard Hakluyt, who expended considerable time and resources conducting research for their maps and drawing up plans to survey the colony. A thorough examination of Gilbert’s sea chart and terrestrial maps clarifies how his circle used them to promote the expedition, to guide it to North America, and to assert their control over the territory. Scholars often depict early modern English colonizers as having little interest in cartographic materials, but Gilbert and his supporters proved that maps served a number of vital functions in preparing and executing a colonizing expedition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Renaissance Society of America 2014

1. Introduction

When European navigators set sail on transatlantic voyages during the sixteenth century, they invariably carried with them a number of maps and charts. These tools were indispensable for the sea passage itself and for any colonizing that was to follow, and in the past few decades the development and use of cartography by sixteenth-century English explorers has become a matter of debate among scholars. Perhaps no single work has broached this subject more closely than the third installment of The History of Cartography series (2007). Collectively, the contributors give the impression that the so-called European cartographic revolution was lost on sixteenth-century English explorers, who were hesitant to utilize maps, which were a relatively new phenomenon in Northern Europe. Sarah Tyacke’s thorough analysis of English chart production makes it clear that the English made few sea charts prior to 1585, leading her to conclude that “mariners distrusted them, and their reluctance to use charts at all, of any sort, continued until at least the 1580s.” In his chapter on map usage among European explorers, Felipe Fernández-Armesto unequivocally states that they “used few maps and made fewer” until the early seventeenth century.Footnote 1

This essay puts forth an alternative interpretation of early modern mapping by examining the often marginalized and misunderstood expedition of Sir Humphrey Gilbert (1539–83), who embraced cartographic materials for a number of purposes during his endeavor to colonize the territory known as Norumbega, roughly equivalent to modern-day New England.Footnote 2 Between 1580 and 1583, at a time when almost no English charts of the Western Hemisphere existed, Gilbert and his supporters produced at least five distinct printed and manuscript maps of North America, each of which formed an integral component of their colonizing project. First, in order to gain permission to colonize, Gilbert’s circle created a map to prove to Queen Elizabeth I (1533–1603) and her advisors that England held land rights to most of North America. Next, the group made Norumbega visible to both literate and nonliterate audiences by printing two promotional maps to fund the expedition, and they devised an innovative nautical chart to guide their vessels across the North Atlantic. Finally, Gilbert’s experts drew up meticulous plans to use the latest cartographic advances in drafting several more maps at sea and in North America to demonstrate their control of the land and to facilitate return voyages to their colony. Their utilization of maps represents a noteworthy progression in the cartography paradigm and in the history of colonization, as maps became less symbolic and more functional to meet the diverse needs associated with overseas settlement.

In recent years, scholars spanning multiple disciplines have reassessed early modern maps as discourses of knowledge and power, and the present study adds to this expanding dialogue.Footnote 3 Focusing primarily on the maps’ projections, their toponymy, and the motif of empty space, this essay illustrates how Gilbert’s cartographers represented the same geographic region (England to Norumbega) in variant ways to persuade their respective audiences to visualize it from a point of view that suited Gilbert’s objectives. Hermeneutic and semiotic analyses of each map yield a fuller understanding of their intended meaning by viewing the maps as texts and by placing them in their historical contexts. Building upon the foundational principles of Benedict Anderson, Henri Lefebvre, and Michel de Certeau — the last of whom concluded that “the map … colonizes space” — this work also elucidates how Gilbert’s coterie used maps and mapping as signifiers of authority within the colonial milieu.Footnote 4 By carefully charting Norumbega’s topography and biota, Gilbert intended to assert his control there and make his supremacy known to Elizabeth. For the first time in England’s history, North America became an area to be settled rather than bypassed, and cartography played a significant part in this transformation.

More than just an overlooked English voyage, then, Gilbert’s expedition and his map use serve as a case study showing the complexity of and research behind England’s earliest colonizing voyages. Historians often view late Tudor exploration as a period characterized by trial and error, but these excursions are more aptly depicted as well-prepared voyages. By 1583 Gilbert’s expedition was three years in the making, and he recruited mapmakers who were among the most skilled practitioners in Elizabethan England. John Dee (1527–1609), the renowned mathematician and sometimes cartographer; Simão Fernandes (ca. 1538–90), the Portuguese émigré with more sailing experience than any Englishman; and Michael Lok (ca. 1532–1622), the map collector and well-traveled merchant adventurer, all conducted substantial research in creating maps to support the expedition. Richard Hakluyt (ca. 1552–1616), the consummate colonization propagandist in the early stages of his career, printed his first book and its two maps to promote the voyage as well. By consulting the most up-to-date atlases, navigational manuals, and almanacs while composing their maps and their instructions for the voyage, these experts offered Gilbert the best chance of establishing his colony.

As England’s first attempt at colonization beyond Britain, Gilbert and his company had no blueprint to follow, and yet their map use was widespread and inventive, which shows that England’s earliest expansionists perceived the usefulness of maps. Although Elizabethan colonizers in Ireland mapped the island beginning in the late 1560s, Norumbega was a largely unknown region across a vast ocean.Footnote 5 Determining its location prior to the voyage required more research and better resources, but Gilbert’s circle designed maps that fulfilled their navigational and promotional purposes. They assigned cartography a prominent place in their expedition and proved that maps could serve various purposes during both the preparation phase and execution of a colonizing voyage.

2. John Dee’s Manuscript Maps: Envisioning an Anglo North America

Decades ago George Parks proclaimed that two charts made by John Dee marked the advent of modern English cartography, and Robert Baldwin recently echoed this sentiment in calling the maps “state-of-the-art geographical and political statements.”Footnote 6 Gilbert’s biographer David B. Quinn found the charts perplexing, and their purpose and relationship to the 1583 expedition remain ambiguous.Footnote 7 Yet thorough analyses of the maps and of the contexts under which they were created suggest that Dee made them specifically to support Gilbert’s voyage. He devised the first map in late 1580 to decisively prove England’s claim to Norumbega and consequently to gain Elizabeth’s approval for the voyage. Three years later and after extensive research, Dee made a second chart to guide Gilbert’s fleet across the North Atlantic.

Dee’s immense library and his assiduously documented associations with several of sixteenth-century Europe’s most prominent cartographers and geographers qualified him to draw maps.Footnote 8 Intent on applying mathematics to resolve navigational problems, Dee’s “Tables Gubernautikes” for finding latitudes and longitudes comprised the majority of his Brytish Complement of the perfect Art of Navigation, which he wrote for the queen in 1576. He used these tables to create maps and charts, including a figural map depicting an anthropomorphic Britain as Elizabeth with crown and sword.Footnote 9 His expertise also made him an indispensable resource for English explorers: Sebastian Cabot (1481–1577), Richard Chancellor (d. 1556), Hugh Willoughby (d. ca. 1554), Stephen Borough (1525–84), and Martin Frobisher (ca. 1535–94) all consulted Dee prior to their voyages.Footnote 10 In 1580 alone Dee assisted the Muscovy Company explorers Arthur Pet and Charles Jackman by providing them with a circumpolar hydrographical chart, a sketch of the opening of the Northeast Passage, and a set of charts for their voyage in search of the passage.Footnote 11

That year Dee also created the earliest map relating to Gilbert’s expedition (fig. 1). Based upon its date and composition, several scholars have posited that Dee made it to promote English expansion, and an examination of its contents clarifies how he molded it to support Gilbert’s expedition.Footnote 12 Dee drew the vellum map amid Gilbert’s preliminary preparations and titled it “Atlantis (named the West Indies in the ordinary way) to correct a representation as still is made common.” It is doubtlessly the same map that Dee presented to Elizabeth, Secretary of State Sir Francis Walsingham (ca. 1532–90), and William Cecil, Lord Burghley (1520–98), on 3 October 1580.Footnote 13 Gilbert had shown his appreciation to Dee a few weeks earlier by granting him all lands in North America above fifty degrees north latitude, which includes most of Canada and rights to the Northwest Passage.Footnote 14 Dee’s map clearly served as an endorsement for colonization, since the reverse lists a dozen British claims to North America that span from the apocryphal explorations of King Arthur in the sixth century to Frobisher’s second voyage in 1577. The map face displayed Gilbert’s intended destination, and the verso affirmed England’s lawful entitlement to that area. Accordingly, Elizabeth and her primary advisors could easily hand the map to individuals at court, members of Parliament, or Privy Counsellors to advertise the voyage and Gilbert’s right to colonize Norumbega.

Figure 1. John Dee. “Ioannis Dee, Anno 1580,” 1580 (detail). Cotton MS Augustus, I.i.1. Courtesy of the British Library Board.

Dee’s use of primarily Spanish and Portuguese nomenclature indicates the map’s provenance, and he likely consulted Portuguese sea charts while making it.Footnote 15 Dee included various details from Gerardus Mercator’s (1512–94) famous 1569 world map, even copying verbatim the cartographer’s invention of the phantom island Groclant: “the Island Groclant whose inhabitants are Swedes by descent.”Footnote 16 In the North Atlantic he also incorporated features of the spurious 1558 map of the Venetian brothers Nicolò and Antonio Zeno. Dee mapped Frobisher’s Meta Incognita and his other recent findings but only mentioned the explorer’s first two voyages on the reverse so as not to remind the queen of Frobisher’s ignominious failure in 1578, which squandered her £4,000 investment. Instead, Dee condensed parts of his own “famous and Ryche Discoveries” (1577) and “Her Maiesties Title Royall, to many forayn Cuntries” (1578).Footnote 17 Citing the law of nations, civil law, and divine law, he professed England’s claim to all American territory north of Florida. Such details imply that Dee made the map to prove England’s claim to Norumbega and to seek Elizabeth’s support for Gilbert’s expedition. Either that, or he presented it to the queen to encourage her to reinstate Gilbert’s letters patent, which she had revoked after his 1578 expedition resorted to piracy.Footnote 18

The map’s layout corroborates these theories. It encompasses the north half of the Western Hemisphere and has a fairly clear focus. Rather than placing Europe or the Atlantic at the center of his map like other European cartographers, Dee emphasized Gilbert’s “NOROMBEGA” as his map’s focal point. As Rhonda Lemke Sanford and other scholars have made evident, even “the most rudimentary maps privilege the center.”Footnote 19 Cartographers placed salient locations at the middle of their maps, where a reader’s gaze typically gravitated. Just as medieval, Jerusalem-centered maps reflected their makers’ reverence for that city, Dee’s map gave Norumbega precedence over all other locations.

On Dee’s map, the territory of Norumbega stretches from the coast at forty-two degrees north to forty-five degrees, near the confluence of two rivers, which converge as the “Rio de Gamas.” Portuguese explorer Esteban Gómez (ca. 1483–1538) assigned this name to Maine’s Penobscot River on account of the plentiful deer that he viewed on its banks during his search for the Northwest Passage in 1525. Dee mistook the Penobscot for the Providence River, which feeds Narragansett Bay, Gilbert’s projected terminus. Gilbert chose to colonize the Narragansett after speaking with Richard Hakluyt the elder (ca. 1530–91), who suggested that he settle on an island within a bay at the mouth of a navigable river to expedite Anglo–Native American trade.Footnote 20 Gilbert had also read André Thévet’s (1516–90) La cosmographie universelle (1575), in which the French cosmographer depicted the Norumbega River as an ideal location for a colony. He noted that large groups of indigenous peoples welcomed the mid-sixteenth-century French explorers who had constructed a fort near the river, which empties into the Atlantic at forty-two degrees north.Footnote 21 Rivers also provided water for drinking, bathing, and waste removal, along with a ready supply of food, and because Gilbert hoped to trade, he resolved to settle near a Native American community. Accordingly, Dee placed the city of Norumbega tantalizingly close to Gilbert’s anticipated landfall at forty-two-and-a-half degrees north along the Rio de Gamas, and he copied the city’s placement and the islands near the river’s mouth from the maps of Mercator, Thévet, and Abraham Ortelius (1527–98).Footnote 22

Mercator and Ortelius had simply labeled the river with the blanket term “Rio Grande,” however, and Dee’s Norumbega region and the North American continent in general are more accurate than the maps of his contemporaries. He also eliminated most of the phantom islands commonly found on sixteenth-century maps of the North Atlantic. Cartographers preferred to label all documented islands on their charts to prevent shipwreck, and the number of islands rapidly increased as each mapmaker copied nonexistent ones from their various source maps.Footnote 23 Dee, on the other hand, wanted to show Elizabeth and her advisors that no geographical obstacles impeded travel between England and Norumbega. Additionally, he drew a truer North American coastline than his peers, and he plotted lines of latitude and longitude. Following the precedent set by earlier chart makers, who used red ink to distinguish noteworthy landmarks, Dee chose red for points of reference like Cape Breton, Nova Scotia; Cape Race, Newfoundland; and other locations between England and Gilbert’s projected colony.Footnote 24 Medieval writers had started the tradition of using rubrica (red ochre) in their books of hours to set off saints’ days, feasts, and other red-letter days, and red remained a marker of distinction in the early modern period in works ranging from manuscripts to the Book of Common Prayer.

To denote the significance of the forty-fifth northern parallel, Dee also drew it in red ink rather than black like the other latitudes. Dee had specified in his 1578 Brytanici Imperii Limites (Limits of the British Empire) that the Iberians, despite the 1494 Treaty of Tordesillas, had no lawful claim to land north of forty-five degrees, or approximately the northern border of Spain by his reckoning.Footnote 25 The elder Hakluyt posited that this parallel marked the northernmost barrier of greatest habitability in the Americas as well, and a few crewmen from Sir Francis Drake’s (1540–96) circumnavigation notified Gilbert that the most productive land on earth was located at forty-five degrees north.Footnote 26 Since Gilbert’s 1578 letters patent from Elizabeth stipulated that he colonize lands “not actually possessed of any Christian prince or people,” the precise location of his colony was critical. Dee even plagiarized the patent in his Brytanici, which he wrote for the queen. In it he presented a case for settling “wher no Christian prince hath presentlie possession or iurisdiction,” which underscored that he expected to colonize north of Spanish towns in North America.Footnote 27

Dee left the largely unexplored North American interior almost completely unmarked on his map, effectively distinguishing it as a terra nullius that was not subject to the sovereignty of a European nation and that invited English colonies like Gilbert’s. Vacant space on early modern maps implied that territorial claims could be made in that area, so Dee was building a case for expansion. In opposition to the negative emptiness of medieval mappæmundi, which simply exposed their makers’ ignorance of geography, Dee’s continent embodied a positive emptiness that was primed for settlers. In the words of D. K. Smith, cartographic renderings like Dee’s “imaginatively inhabited” the land with potential English colonizers.Footnote 28 Dee hoped to appeal to Elizabeth and her counselors by depicting North America as the ideal location to accommodate England’s growing population, which, according to Hakluyt and other English expansionists, had surpassed the carrying capacity of the land. Dee’s map also enlarged the Elizabethan “Paper Empire” that, until the Stuart era, existed only in theory.Footnote 29 There was no longer a need, as in the recent past, to depict the known ecumene, so Dee’s map and the rest of Gilbert’s maps were more territorially focused. They displayed England in relation to Norumbega, which helped transform the spatial relationship of Europe and North America “from a state of separation to one of proximity.”Footnote 30

Taken together, these points suggest that Dee sought to validate Britain’s legal claim to North America through his map and its corresponding text. His extensive list of British voyages to the region supplemented his visual representation of Norumbega. Summarizing substantial historical and geographical information on a single sheet allowed him to convey details that otherwise would have filled several pages. Such a format accelerated the transmission of the map’s content to interested readers and helped them envision Gilbert’s proposed expedition and colony. It cannot be proven that it was Dee’s work that convinced Elizabeth to reinstate Gilbert’s patent and allow him to prepare for Norumbega, since she may have had little interest in maps.Footnote 31 It is clear, however, that Dee and Gilbert deemed the map sufficient proof of England’s legal right to colonize Norumbega.

Considering the map’s intended audience and its significance to his expedition, Gilbert wanted it to be as accurate a representation of North America as possible. He ensured that his geographical expert Dee had detailed information at his disposal by obtaining a firsthand cartographic depiction of Norumbega (fig. 2). In 1580 Simão Fernandes finished a chart, which one of Dee’s servants copied and then presented to Dee at his Mortlake residence.Footnote 32 It differs considerably from either of the maps that Dee made for Gilbert’s voyage, because it served a different purpose. Like Dee, Fernandes possessed the knowledge to create a true illustration of the Atlantic, but his ability came from experience at sea rather than mathematical prowess. As early as the 1570s, by which time he had been to Brazil and to North America’s eastern coast with the Spanish, Fernandes was well known in England for his navigational skill. The notorious Welsh pirate John Callice (d. ca. 1587) traveled to London specifically to request that Fernandes serve as his pilot for an expedition to the West Indies, and Fernandes also sailed from England to the Canaries and back again in a small vessel with a crew of nine or ten.Footnote 33

Figure 2. Simão Fernandes. “The Cownterfet of Mr. Fernando Simon his Sea carte which he lent unto my Master at Mortlake. Ao. 1580. Novemb. 20. The same Fernando Simon is a Portugale, and borne in Tercera being one of the Iles called AZORES,” 1580 (detail). Cotton Roll, XIII, 48. Courtesy of the British Library Board.

Knowledge of this voyage persuaded Gilbert to employ Fernandes as the pilot for his 1578 expedition. Fernandes should have been hanged for pirating, but, much to the disgust of his victims, he was released from prison by Walsingham, one of the main promoters of Gilbert’s expeditions. The voyage deteriorated after Henry Knollys (d. 1583) deserted the fleet and turned to piracy, but Fernandes guided the Falcon past the Canaries and into the open Atlantic before being forced to return to England.Footnote 34 Fernandes’s talents prompted Gilbert’s half-brother and captain of the Falcon, Walter Ralegh (1554–1618), to hire him as pilot for his Roanoke voyages, as did Edward Fenton (d. 1603) for his 1582 expedition to Asia.

When Gilbert devised a reconnaissance mission to Norumbega, Fernandes was the obvious choice to lead it. On 7 April 1580, Gilbert entered into a bond of good behavior in the High Court of Admiralty for £500 for Fernandes’s ten-man crew, who sailed aboard Gilbert’s eight-ton frigate Squirrel.Footnote 35 The small company assembled at Dartmouth on the River Dart just a few miles downriver from Gilbert’s home at Greenway. Almost nothing is known of their route, but Fernandes and his crew eventually reached Norumbega, where they found abundant commodities, large animal hides, and round Native American houses. They completed their mission in the remarkably quick time of three months and were back in Dartmouth by November at the latest.Footnote 36

Fernandes filled in some details on his chart during his numerous voyages and from other Portuguese and Spanish maps. He completed the rest of it during his 1580 reconnaissance mission, since he immediately visited Dee upon his arrival in London to reveal his new findings.Footnote 37 Like Dee’s map, the copy of Fernandes’s chart contains very detailed outlines of North, Central, and South America from latitude sixty-eight north to thirty-six south, and the similar North American coastal contours of each map confirm that Dee used Fernandes’s chart as a source. The complete Caribbean region and West African coastline suggest knowledge of Portuguese exploration or perhaps Fernandes’s own broader travels. He chose the universal label “Rio Grande” for the Rio de Gamas, and, like Dee, he included several islands in its mouth at forty-two degrees north latitude. Consequently, Fernandes referred to the adjoining region with the exonym C. de las muitas islas (Cape of Many Islands) by mixing his native Portuguese (muitas) with the Spanish that he had acquired. The Narragansett Bay archipelago with its more than thirty islands is among the few estuaries on the Atlantic coast that match Fernandes’s description. He also revealed his familiarity with the area by making it apparent that sands were present in the vicinity of Sable Island to the southeast of Cape Breton. Fernandes placed the majority of his labels on the eastern coast of North America, the focal point of his chart, but it was not a promotional piece like Dee’s map.

Fernandes made his sea chart for sailors and utilized geographical findings that he had collected over many years, which provided Dee with substantial information with which to draft his map. That Gilbert sought out one of Elizabethan England’s most experienced navigators to undertake the voyage to map Norumbega reveals his high regard for cartography and its multiple uses. Norumbega remained terra incognita into the seventeenth century, so Gilbert needed a reliable account of the region to present to Dee, his primary cartographer. Rather than providing a written report, Fernandes produced a map as evidence of North America’s geography.

Fernandes’s and Dee’s maps helped Gilbert get his project off the ground, but he still required a sea chart of his potential course, as the most up-to-date navigational manuals suggested that mariners use one.Footnote 38 In known European waters, pilots relied upon a number of simple navigational tools like rutters, compasses, and cross-staffs, in addition to the location of various reference points that they became familiar with while at sea. For transoceanic voyages, during which land remained out of view for weeks, sea charts were more useful, though far from standard.Footnote 39 Gilbert hired crewmen like Richard Clarke, who had piloted around Newfoundland, but navigators with experience maneuvering in the waters near Norumbega were at a premium. The only men in England known to have navigated there, Fernandes and John Walker, were both unavailable, as they sailed with Fenton in 1582. Norumbega’s poorly defined location (or absence) on late sixteenth-century maps further complicated matters.Footnote 40

In light of his limited resources, Gilbert commissioned Dee to create a guide chart for the voyage to ensure safe passage across the North Atlantic. As chief consultant for Frobisher’s first voyage in search of the Northwest Passage, Dee had instructed the explorer to carry several printed guide maps, including Mercator’s chart and Thévet’s 1575 La cosmographie universelle with its assortment of maps.Footnote 41 Frobisher’s crew had no guide for northern seas, however: William Borough (1536–99) devised a rudimentary sea chart in 1576, but Christopher Hall simply used it to indicate compass variation and to draw crude sketches of Frobisher’s discoveries.Footnote 42 Of the fifteen extant English manuscript marine representations and charts made prior to 1583, only the Borough chart and Dee’s two maps depict North America.Footnote 43 Italian, Portuguese, and Spanish portolan charts of the Mediterranean began appearing in the thirteenth century, but Dee was the first to create a guide chart specifically for an English voyage.

Entitled “Sr Humfray Gylbert knight his charte” (fig. 3), Dee did not sign the map but instead included three versions of his monad, or glyph, which he had described at length in his 1564 Monas Hyroglyphica.Footnote 44 Gilbert had his own personal emblem, which can be seen on two extant portraits, and this likely accounts for the map’s symbolism. Gilbert’s earliest documented association with Dee dates from 1567, when Dee interpreted his dreams.Footnote 45 Dee’s emblem superseded the royal and family arms that frequently adorned maps to show possession, and one is flanked by the letters “T S fecit” (“T S made it”).Footnote 46 These initials may signify that Thomas Seckford (1515–87) sponsored Dee’s work, as he knew Gilbert and had financed many other cartographic pieces. Regardless of T. S.’s identity, the initials prove that multiple individuals had a hand in devising Dee’s chart.Footnote 47

Figure 3. John Dee. “Sr Humfray Gylbert Knight his charte,” 1583 (detail). Rare Book Division, Elkins Americana, no. 42. Courtesy of the Free Library of Philadelphia.

Dee focused on the region that Gilbert resolved to settle, and his chart displays the entire Northern Hemisphere beyond the Tropic of Cancer. Following the example set by John Cabot (ca. 1451–98), who believed that he had landed on an island in 1497, Dee depicted Norumbega as such. By including an expansive Northwest Passage and by placing Giovanni da Verrazano’s (1485–1528) strait across the North American continent, he offered two potential routes from Norumbega or England to Cathay and Japan. Verrazano believed that he had found a passage to Asia when he explored the Outer Banks of North Carolina in 1524, and Dee was familiar with Lok’s map of Verrazano’s discoveries that showed the supposed strait.Footnote 48 Dee’s chart accentuates the North Atlantic more so than Norumbega and presents the ocean as an obstruction-free conduit between England and North America.

In his personal papers Dee refers to his map as “A Geographical and Hydrographical Representation of the Northern Hemisphere: Differing a long way off from commonly known Charts: given away as a present to certain Englishmen undertaking the sailing towards the Northerly Shores of the Atlantic, in the year 1583.”Footnote 49 These differences could allude to any number of Dee’s innovations, such as his map’s novel projection, his removal of the numerous fantasy islands commonly placed on other maps, and, most prominently, his widening of the North Atlantic vis-à-vis Mercator and Ortelius. Dee knew the Flemish cartographers, studied their maps, and owed some of his cartographic skill to them, but he considered it “an offense against manifest truth to have fixed so small a space” between London and North America.Footnote 50 Both Mercator’s 1569 and Ortelius’s 1564 world maps have had an enduring cartographic legacy, but Dee’s criticism was not without merit. Ortelius established the distance from England’s western tip to Newfoundland at approximately thirty-seven degrees, and Mercator placed it at forty degrees. Forty-seven degrees actually separate the two locations, and Dee underestimated this expanse by just one or two degrees on his guide chart.Footnote 51

Dee further improved upon existing charts by making use of the “paradoxal compass” map projection that he had invented in the 1550s for the Muscovy Company, which wanted an effective means of traversing the Norwegian and Barents Seas. Mercator similarly attempted to aid sailors in 1569 by devising the rectangular grid projection that bears his name. His chart let sailors navigate with a constant bearing along straight rhumb lines that by definition intersect all meridians at the same angle.Footnote 52 Yet Dee recommended that navigators discard Mercator’s maps due to their exaggerated polar regions and only use hydrographical charts lacking parallel meridians.Footnote 53 Gilbert likewise perceived the insufficiencies of standard cylindrical projection maps like those of Ortelius, which showed uniform degrees of longitude irrespective of their latitude. He sought to “amende the errours of usuall sea cardes” by designing “a Spherical instrument, with a compasse of variation, for the perfect knowing of the longitude.”Footnote 54 Gilbert and Dee both recognized that replicating the globe on a two-dimensional, rectangular planisphere increasingly skewed longitudes toward the poles and hindered navigation at latitudes numerically greater than either forty degrees north or south. Accordingly, Dee centered his gnomic projection guide chart at the geographic North Pole to portray northern waters more precisely, which also converted the straight loxodromes and latitudinal parallels of Mercator maps into spiraled rhumb lines and latitudes of concentric circles. Although azimuthal polar charts compressed equatorial distances and obliged navigators to periodically change their bearings, Dee and Gilbert realized that this projection was best for depicting large geographic spaces and for navigating at high latitudes.Footnote 55

Such features imply that Dee created his chart as a guide for Gilbert’s voyage, and it would not have served as a promotional piece, as some scholars have suggested.Footnote 56 His projection showed that the England to Cathay voyage was equidistant via the Northwest or Northeast Passages, which would have hardly compelled investors to support Gilbert instead of the well-established Russia Company and their monopoly on the eastern route. Dee also did not mention the recent discoveries of Frobisher or Drake, and the map’s compact size made it ideal for the confines of a ship. It lacks the decoration of standard presentation copies and contains far fewer labels than other maps associated with the expedition, so investors would have recognized few familiar names. Dee labeled reference points like the main capes of Western Europe and listed a few erroneous North American places typically found on early modern maps, but much of the chart is empty space. Such a void means that the chart may have never left England, for as Bernhard Klein has shown, sea charts were ephemeral and only reached a state of completion after the inclusion of new material at the voyage’s destination.Footnote 57

A last-minute agreement between Gilbert and his primary investor Sir George Peckham (d. 1608) confirms that Dee designed the chart as a guide, and it elucidates how maps functioned alongside other colonization documents. Three months prior to his departure, Gilbert sold a portion of Norumbega to Peckham and his son to acquire resources for the voyage. He granted Peckham 1.5 million acres of land near the mouth of the Dee (Providence) River, which, at “about fortye twoo degrees,” emptied into a large bay that contained five islands known as the Cinque Isles.Footnote 58 The bay, Verrazano’s Refugio (Narragansett Bay), and its five small islands are indicated on Dee’s map to the north of Claudia (Block) Island at forty-two degrees. Gilbert and Peckham fashioned their agreement to correspond with Dee, whose chart functioned like an estate plot by dividing up the territory before the voyage ever left England’s shores. Like similar maps of uncharted lands, it “acted on a quasi-legal basis as substantiation for overseas territorial claims,”Footnote 59 and it proved to those unassociated with the expedition that Gilbert had the legal right to claim Norumbega.

The instructions for specialists among Gilbert’s expedition and the agreed-upon rendezvous points listed by Edward Hayes (ca. 1550–1616) in the lone surviving account of the voyage shed additional light on the chart. Gilbert’s copious directions for the voyage name only five locations north of Florida: in addition to mentioning Norumbega itself, he warned the ships’ masters to be especially careful when sailing near “Claudini and Saint Johns Isles” and advised pilots setting forth from Cape Breton to sail two leagues to find “the Isle of Sabla.”Footnote 60 Hayes reported that the captains of Gilbert’s five vessels agreed to reconvene at Cape Race if separated, and, failing that, to meet at Cape Breton. Inclement weather forced them to reassemble instead at St. John’s, Newfoundland, after which they proceeded to Cape Race. Following eight additional days of difficult sailing in poor conditions, Hayes recorded that the fleet headed for “the Island of Sabla” and “Cape Briton.” During their search for the island, Gilbert’s largest vessel, the Delight, broke apart and sank due to heavy rain and inadequate watchkeeping. According to the ship’s master Richard Clarke, who had been to the region before, the Delight grounded on the sand banks encircling Sable Island.Footnote 61

Dee included all of the abovementioned locations on his map, and he labeled all but one of them. He drew an appropriately shaped but misoriented and unnamed St. John’s (Prince Edward) Island, and he labeled Cape Breton, Cape Race, Claudia Island, and Sable Island. Aside from Belle Isle, these are the only landmarks that Dee placed in the region, and he was the first cartographer to label Sable Island with that name.Footnote 62 He evidently designed his map to correspond with Gilbert’s instructions regarding the expedition’s anticipated course.

Hayes’s report, Gilbert’s instructions, and Dee’s map all suggest that Gilbert directed his course for Sable Island, but this choice is a peculiar one. A generic, misplaced version of the island first appeared as “Isola della Rena” (“Island of Sand”) on Hieronimo da Verrazano’s 1529 map of Northeastern Canada (fig. 4), but thereafter it largely disappeared from the cartographic record. Finding Sable Island, which is less than one mile wide and thirteen square miles in area, would have been difficult for the best early modern navigators. Located nearly 200 miles from the continent, it has a fairly barren landscape with no prominent landmarks to see from a distance. Persistent, thick fogs and submerged sandbanks encompassing the island further complicate navigation in the area, and the more than 350 documented shipwrecks that have occurred around Sable Island have earned it the nickname “Graveyard of the Atlantic.”Footnote 63

Figure 4. Hieronimo da Verrazano. “Untitled map,” 1529 (detail). In Giovanni Battista Ramusio, Terzo Volvme Delle Navigationi et Viaggi Nel Qvale Si Contengono, 424–25. Venice, 1556. Courtesy of the Huntington Library.

Clarke and Gilbert were cognizant of the risks associated with navigating near Sable Island or in any uncharted waters, but their need for provisions required them to locate it. They only stopped at Newfoundland to buy fish, wine, and other essentials, and Gilbert stayed briefly to assert his claim to the land in case he failed to reach Norumbega or if it proved unproductive.Footnote 64 His patent was set to expire in 1584, so Newfoundland became his failsafe. In his instructions, Gilbert ordered his pilots to “finde the Isle of Sabla which is very full of cattell and swyne which may supplye your wantes with greate gaine.” Portuguese sailors had placed these animals on the island during the 1550s to serve as fresh meat for subsequent voyages to North America. A Portuguese at St. John’s corroborated the presence of livestock at the island, and the withdrawal of Ralegh’s 240-ton cargo ship Bark Ralegh just three days into the voyage made locating it all the more pressing.Footnote 65 The leaders of the expedition realized that their colony needed these animals to survive the winter, so Dee created a map to guide them to the secluded island. His placements of Sable Island at forty-four degrees north and Claudia Island directly south of Narragansett Bay at forty-one degrees north are extremely accurate. Cape Breton’s latitude is also very precise, while the longitudes of the cape and islands are within one or two degrees of their true locations in relation to England. Even the relative shapes, though not the orientations, of Sable and Claudia Islands are quite accurate.

Dee must have consulted credible authorities to so accurately place Norumbega’s environs, and considering that just a handful of Europeans had been there, it is surprising how many sources were available to him. He had access to Gilbert’s interrogations of Fernandes, Walker, and David Ingram, the only Englishmen known to have reached Norumbega.Footnote 66 English fishermen had been visiting the Grand Banks for nearly a century as of 1580, by which time they may have reached as far west as Maine. Gilbert counted fishermen like Clarke and Anthony Parkhurst among his crewmen and investors.Footnote 67 English pirates, another potential source for Dee, began pushing northward from the West Indies along the North American coast during their search for Spanish treasure fleets, reaching Santa Elena (South Carolina) and areas farther northward by the late sixteenth century.Footnote 68 These corsairs were sailing directly to Newfoundland to find plunder by 1580, and Clarke’s attack on the island in 1582 prompted fishermen to briefly prevent Gilbert from entering St. John’s the following year. Clarke even warned Gilbert that “unknowen sands lay off a great way from” Sable Island, and Dee would have spoken with him during their preparations.Footnote 69 Dee’s sources also probably included the Portuguese, who were a common enemy of Spain following King Philip II’s (1527–98) annexation of Portugal in 1580. That year Hakluyt interviewed Portuguese ambassador Don Antonio de Castilio, and Dee may have done the same to gain intelligence about the Americas.Footnote 70

Dee’s former student and expert cartographer William Borough, who helped write Gilbert’s instructions for the expedition in 1582 and by that time had known Dee for three decades, probably provided geographical intelligence for the map as well.Footnote 71 A 1579 rutter authored by Borough and his brother Stephen reveals their familiarity with Atlantic Canada, as they cautioned that three leagues from the mainland “[a]t cape race begyneth The sand called Knocke John.” The book also supplied accurate estimations of the winds and currents from northern Newfoundland to the cape and points southward.Footnote 72 In Borough’s 1581 Discourse of the Variation of the Compass, which Gilbert used in preparing his voyage, the author justly criticized cartographers, who generally situated Cape Race directly west of the Isles of Scilly. Borough placed the islands at fifty degrees north and the cape at forty-six and one-third degrees, which are exact readings for their locations.Footnote 73 Dee’s chart depicted Cape Race at the same latitude and the Scillies at precisely fifty degrees as well. Capitalizing upon the research of Borough and others helped Dee create a highly functional chart for voyages from Europe to eastern Canada, which was a fitting guide for Gilbert’s expedition.

Since Dee’s map prominently displayed the expedition’s projected route and destination, Gilbert considered it vital to his success and took steps to protect it from Spanish spies and untrustworthy members of his own crew. He learned the importance of concealing his plans during his 1578 expedition, when Spanish ambassador Don Bernardino de Mendoza (ca. 1540–1604) infiltrated his crew with a spy and received accurate reports of his preparations and intentions.Footnote 74 Philip II regularly defended his American colonies from unwanted intruders, and he strove to block England’s efforts at westward expansion. Mendoza’s threats to Catholic investors in 1582 eliminated some of Gilbert’s most significant financiers, and he employed spies in 1583 as well. One of his English agents, the rebellious Catholic aristocrat Henry Howard, Earl of Northampton (1540–1614), invested a new, 120-ton ship for Gilbert’s expedition in April but quickly withdrew, which was probably a ploy to gain intelligence about the mission.Footnote 75 Mendoza must have implanted at least one agent among the crew, however, because he provided Philip II with fairly accurate reports throughout Gilbert’s preparations.Footnote 76

Such subterfuge by Spanish emissaries in London and the lack of discipline during his first expedition made Gilbert extremely protective of any documents indicating his proposed course, as exemplified by the detailed instructions that he left with his twelve officers. One set sealed with yellow wax was not to be opened until they reached the Atlantic, while the red wax on another set of instructions would only be broken at Norumbega. Gilbert also left explicit orders to safeguard several documents significant to his expedition, including his letters patent, his grant to the town of Southampton for their investments, and “the Sea Carde” (Dee’s chart). He ordered them to be secured in an iron chest with three locks, and he provided keys to three prominent Southampton merchants until the leaders of the voyage were determined.Footnote 77

Enclosing Dee’s map with the letters patent and the Southampton grant shows that Gilbert regarded it as an important element of his expedition. His patent gave him royal authority to colonize Norumbega and provided a safeguard against anyone who might question the legality of his claim. His agreement with the Southampton merchants assured him the equipment and financial means to finally set sail. Without either of these documents his voyage would have been impossible. Dee’s chart carried equal weight, because it served as a simple guide to Norumbega, and it reinforced his entitlement to the area. Taking the time and effort to procure and protect his maps affirms that Gilbert considered them integral components of his enterprise.

3. Richard Hakluyt’s Printed Maps: Promoting the English Colonization of North America

Manuscript maps sufficed as guides or to appeal to a limited group like Elizabeth and her council, but Gilbert’s circle required printed maps to reach a broader audience and acquire funding. Lacking the state sponsorship of their Iberian counterparts, English explorers occasionally relied upon promotional literature to win over potential investors. Gilbert’s coterie printed various advertisements between 1580 and 1583, and in so doing they made a case for using printed maps to endorse colonization. Gilbert had helped spearhead the use of promotional maps in 1576, when he allowed his Discourse of a discouerie for a new passage to Cataia to be printed. His succinct book was issued to attract investors to Frobisher’s first expedition, and it contained the earliest English printed world map (fig. 5). The map’s heart-shaped configuration derived from Ortelius’s 1570 world map, and Gilbert filled in details using an unknown Spanish chart, Sebastian Cabot’s world map in Elizabeth’s Whitehall gallery, and other early modern globes and maps. With a clear Northwest Passage but no visible passage to the northeast, the map reinforced the book’s thesis and served as a reference for locations mentioned in the text. The book received favorable endorsements from other Elizabethan expansionists, including Dee, Lok, poet George Gascoigne (ca. 1535–78), and mathematician William Bourne (ca. 1535–82), and it convinced Gilbert that promotional maps were valuable.Footnote 78

Figure 5. Humphrey Gilbert. “A General Map made onelye for the Particvler Declaration of this Discovery.” In A discourse of a discouerie for a new passage to Cataia. London, 1576. Courtesy of the Huntington Library.

When Gilbert needed to advertise his own expedition, he turned to Hakluyt, who printed his first publication, Divers Voyages touching the discoverie of America (1582), to attract investors. The concise quarto book appeared concurrently with Hungarian scholar Stephen Parmenius’s De Navigatione, a Latin poem directed at Gilbert’s humanist associates. Hakluyt wrote his book for the nobility and the merchant class, and he translated or transcribed several documents concerning North America’s eastern coast. In addition to transcribing John Cabot’s letters patent and Robert Thorne’s (1492–1532) writings, which supported England’s claim to the region, Hakluyt translated Verrazano’s discovery of Norumbega and reprinted Huguenot explorer Jean Ribault’s (1520–65) account of Florida. Hakluyt inserted his own list of American commodities and printed colonizing instructions that his older cousin had compiled for Gilbert in 1578. The first two sections of the book conclude with maps, which Hakluyt deemed necessary in displaying North America and the probable track of the voyage. His later books rarely contained maps, so he may have included them due to Gilbert’s insistence. They are the only visual aids in the text, and Hakluyt used cartographic materials in his research as well, since the book opens with a chronological listing of “late writers of Geographie” that includes Mercator (1541), Ortelius (1564), Thévet (1575), and Gilbert (1576).

Gilbert had used printed works to gain support for his first expedition, but none of them included cartographic materials.Footnote 79 Even though printed maps were new to England, as 85 percent of early modern English printed maps were completed after 1590, enclosing maps within books became more practical as the merchant class’s cartographic literacy developed.Footnote 80 Therefore, Hakluyt recruited Lok, the main promoter and organizer of Frobisher’s voyages and an acquaintance of Gilbert, to make a map for Divers Voyages.Footnote 81 Both Hakluyt and Lok dedicated their works to Philip Sidney (1554–86), an avid supporter of colonization who knew Dee, Gilbert, and Hakluyt, and whose father Henry had commanded Gilbert in Ireland. Lok’s woodcut map is his only confirmed association with the project and his only known cartographic output, but he had extensive geographical knowledge. Prior to his involvement with Frobisher, Lok had led several trading missions around Europe and Asia, and by the late 1570s he had amassed a large collection of maps and navigational books.Footnote 82

Lok’s polar map lacks the intricacy of Dee’s maps or the Fernandes chart, in part because the English Crown did not want to disclose any new geographic details regarding North America. The Privy Council forbade members of the Frobisher and Drake expeditions from publishing books or maps about their findings out of fear that they would leak to England’s international rivals, so Lok had to be careful about what he printed.Footnote 83 Furthermore, early woodcut maps were inevitably basic due to the rigors of creating them. A professional block cutter had to transfer Lok’s image from paper to wooden planks by painstakingly carving away sections to leave a raised surface, which was then covered in ink and pressed onto paper. The process was time consuming, arduous, and expensive, so Gilbert and Hakluyt must have felt strongly about the persuasive power of such maps.Footnote 84

Lok essentially created an early modern locator map by displaying Gilbert’s general destination in relation to England, which he hoped would reinforce Hakluyt’s text to secure investments and to attract colonists. Lok needed only to show notable places and to provide reference points for locations mentioned in the book, while making North America seem worthwhile. Richard D’Abate posited that the map presents Norumbega as a mirror image of England, since both appear as islands adjacent to a large continent. Lok wanted his audience to have no difficulty envisioning a new life at Gilbert’s Norumbega colony. While Dee made sure to depict a wider, more accurate Atlantic, Lok longitudinally truncated it in hopes that the close proximity of England and Northeast America would appeal to investors.Footnote 85 A quicker sea passage presented fewer chances of encountering storms and increased the probability of making multiple trading voyages each year between Gilbert’s colony and the metropole.

Yet Lok’s map also resembles Dee’s guide chart in various respects, and the two may have collaborated on them.Footnote 86 Both placed Norumbega at or near the center of their maps to focus their readers’ attention, which left England barely visible on the periphery. These configurations contrasted with the majority of early modern world maps that exaggerated Europe’s size and placed it near the map’s middle. Both cartographers also depicted Claudia and the Bay of Refugio with its five small islands, though Lok mistakenly placed various phantom islands in the Atlantic. He displayed England’s claim to Norumbega on the map by referencing John Cabot’s discovery of the island with “J. Gabot. 1497” printed in large script below “Jac[ques]. Cartier 1535” (fig. 6). He left no doubt that Cabot’s voyage and thus England’s right to Norumbega predated Cartier’s (1491–1557) exploration of, and France’s claim to, the region. Lok further reinforced this assertion by showing Frobisher’s recent discoveries in the North Atlantic.

Figure 6. Michael Lok. “Illvstri viro, Domino Philippo Sidnæo Michael Lok Civis Londinensis Hanc Chartam Dedicabat: .1582” (detail). In Richard Hakluyt, Divers Voyages touching the Discoverie of America, and the Ilands adjacent. London, 1582. Courtesy of the Huntington Library.

Much like Dee’s 1583 map, Lok displayed North America and Western Europe via a cordiform projection and included a prominent Verrazano’s strait across North America. Both men copied this strait from a parchment map owned by Lok that was made by Giovanni da Verrazano for Henry VIII (1491–1547).Footnote 87 Just as American interventionists used polar maps during World War II to accentuate Europe’s proximity to the United States, Lok chose this projection to solicit investments by highlighting Norumbega’s closeness to England.Footnote 88 Rather than negating Hakluyt’s intent by endorsing exploration of the Northwest Passage, as has been suggested by some scholars, the map actually magnified the mercantile potential of a Norumbega colony.Footnote 89 Lok showed that adventurers could reach the riches of Cathay from the colony by passing through either Frobisher’s Meta Incognita or Verrazano’s strait. He anticipated that this type of speculative cartography depicting undiscovered lands would appeal to the merchant class, which often represented the majority of joint-stock shareholders.

Hakluyt also reproduced Thorne’s 1527 world map in his book. He acquired the original map and some of Thorne’s papers from London author Cyprian Lucar (ca. 1544–1611), whose father Emanuel had been an apprentice to Thorne.Footnote 90 The simplistic map makes England appear disproportionately close to the eastern shore of North America, which is claimed as “Land here first discovered by the English,” but Hakluyt included it for a different reason. He explained that the map “may seeme rude” to late sixteenth-century observers, but the Thorne material in the book “coulde not well be understood without” it. Hakluyt condoned its deficiencies on account of that generation’s inadequate grasp on cosmography, while his inclusion of the map is emblematic of his high regard for cartography as an advertising tool.Footnote 91 Though admittedly out of date, Thorne’s map served as a point of reference and as a historical text in its own right. Now, readers could view both the oldest and most recent English maps of the Americas in the same book, which provided visual evidence of English cartography’s maturation and of English mapmakers’ growing comprehension of geography. More obviously, the woodcut map served as proof of an Englishman who had been willing to explore North America, and it had the added bonus of helping readers conceptualize England–to–Norumbega navigation.

Surviving evidence indicates that Divers Voyages and its maps had a moderate print run and influenced at least a few individuals to join the expedition.Footnote 92 A day after the book was licensed on 22 May 1582, Sir Edmund Brudenell, a prominent landowner, justice of the peace, and sheriff of Northamptonshire, purchased the copy that now resides at the Free Library of Philadelphia. Less than a month later he and several Catholic gentlemen drew up an elaborate agreement to take part in Gilbert’s expedition.Footnote 93

The book also gained the interest of its dedicatee, Philip Sidney, who wrote that “Master Hackluit hath served for a very good Trumpet” for the voyage.Footnote 94 On 7 July 1582, Sidney signed an accord with Gilbert, and though neither party recorded the amount of Sidney’s investment, it must have been substantial. Gilbert’s gift of three million acres of Norumbega’s territory to the young courtier doubled the acreage that he had granted to Peckham and Lancashire Catholic Sir Thomas Gerrard for their stake in the expedition.Footnote 95 Like his father, Sidney considered accompanying Gilbert to North America, commenting that he was “haulf perswaded to enter into the journey of Sir Humphrey Gilbert very eagerli” to see his purchase in person.Footnote 96 Elizabeth would not have allowed him to leave anyway, but Sidney maintained his interest in the expedition and granted some of his land at Norumbega to Peckham in July 1583.Footnote 97

Gilbert and his supporters also successfully promoted the expedition by bringing their maps directly to potential investors. In August 1582, colonization advocate Maurice Browne (1555–83) consulted a man “of excellent knowlegd and expearience in navigatione and in Cosmographye,” which almost certainly refers to Dee. After discussing the accuracy of a map of Portuguese provenance dating from the mid-sixteenth century, the man promised to show Browne “one of the newest cardes” of the Americas, which was in reference to either Lok’s recently printed map or Dee’s 1580 chart.Footnote 98 Less than a month later, Gilbert invited Browne to his London home, where for two nights they discussed the impending voyage. As a trusted friend of Walsingham, one of the queen’s top advisors, Browne would have been ideal to chronicle the expedition for Elizabeth. After using the experiences of Ingram and Fernandes to persuade Browne to join his crew, Gilbert displayed his letters patent from the queen and his most compelling document, “the card of the whole country,” Dee’s 1580 map.

Browne’s meeting with Gilbert convinced him to sign on as voyage chronicler, and he encouraged his friend John Thynne to invest “ether in mony or corne.” Thynne eventually supplied butter, cheese, and marmalade for the voyage, and one of the extant copies of Divers Voyages, which was once owned by Thomas Thynne, Second Marquess of Bath (1765–1837), still resides at Longleat House, Wiltshire, the ancestral seat of the Thynne family.Footnote 99 It contains several check marks and the word “Finis” written on the text in a hand that appears to match John Thynne’s. It has been suggested that the writing potentially signifies discussions between Thynne and Browne, and because the book lacks both maps, they may have been taken out and used by Gilbert to persuade the men to support him.Footnote 100

Regardless of the maps’ influence on Thynne, Browne, Sidney, and Brudenell, their presence in Hakluyt’s book shows that Gilbert’s circle prized maps for their promotional value. Gilbert would have saved much-needed capital for his cash-strapped voyage by omitting the maps, but they were the easiest way to present the still-disputed geography of North America. As J. B. Harley rightfully contended, “Insofar as maps were used in colonial promotion, and lands claimed on paper before they were effectively occupied, maps anticipated empire.”Footnote 101 Gilbert failed to establish a presence at Norumbega, but the maps in Divers Voyages served as useful propaganda for his expedition by depicting the region as if he already had control there.

4. Thomas Bavin’s Mapmaking: Claiming North America for England

Having used maps to gain permission for the expedition, to guide it across the Atlantic, and to fund it, Gilbert’s final use for maps would take place at Norumbega. He and his associates still needed to send a detailed report of the country to investors remaining in England. Doing so would reinforce their claim to the land and its commodities as stipulated in Gilbert’s letters patent. Rather than compiling a simple list, however, Gilbert intended to plot trade goods and geographic features on a series of maps.Footnote 102 An exhaustive map of eastern North America would grant him unprecedented knowledge of the land and thus enhance his authority, while systematically charting the voyage would simplify return trips to the colony. Moreover, Elizabeth and Walsingham had promised to send Gilbert additional men, ships, and other materials to firmly establish his colony after receiving news of his landing and Norumbega’s resources.Footnote 103 An in-depth description of the country might have even convinced reluctant investors to provide resources that Gilbert still needed to plant his settlement, so he planned to map not only the Norumbega region, but also the location of specific commodities therein.

This was not the first time that Gilbert attested to the importance of mapping. In his proposal to Elizabeth for establishing an academy to instruct her wards (ca. 1570), he called for two mathematicians: one to instruct on military matters and another to teach cosmography, astronomy, navigation, and the drawing of maps and sea charts. By studying the axioms of measurement, proportion, and perspective, his pupils would be able “to take by view of eye the platte of any thinge.”Footnote 104 Approximately a dozen years later in June 1582, he and Peckham blueprinted a reconnaissance mission to be led by Frobisher, Richard Bingham (1527–99), and other prominent seamen, who would list Norumbega’s commodities and make “mappes, cardes, observacions, and notes” prior to the arrival of the main expedition.Footnote 105 The mission never sailed, but Gilbert’s circle created more-detailed instructions for mapping Norumbega the same year.

The expedition leaders recruited numerous individuals capable of mapping “the perticuler place where every suche thinge shal be founde,” including the locations and elevations of islands, which would clarify the environs of Gilbert’s colony and help prevent shipwreck. They requested that all commodities, metals, flora, and fauna be mapped and described precisely, showing Gilbert’s debt to medieval cartographers, who included such visual representations on their maps. Charting the positions of ship-making materials, salt for curing, fish, havens, and navigable rivers was of the utmost concern, because these would help the colony thrive. The group solicited maps of the River of Norumbega, Gilbert’s intended destination, and they wanted to know where ships could land near it, if it was navigable, and if its mouth could be defended, since Gilbert planned to construct a fort there. Their interest in the region’s Native Americans mainly pertained to trade, as they hoped to exchange English cloth for products desirable in Europe. Gilbert intended to map different Native American language groups and diagram what commodities each group required and possessed. Charting the territories, alliances, and enemies of each ruler would also benefit the English colonizers if conflicts arose.Footnote 106

Gilbert and his supporters reserved the most comprehensive instructions for specialist Thomas Bavin, who would carry out the bulk of the mapping and surveying.Footnote 107 Not only would Bavin “drawe to lief” all beasts and plants alien to England, but he would also map the locations of oysters, muscles, shellfish, sheep, and hogs, presumably to guarantee a food source. He would chart hills, woods, and the positions and depths of rivers, while his instructions indicated that there was “never so smale an Island or thing” unworthy of mapping. He was to also differentiate the species of trees within each mapped forest to create more inclusive maps and to locate timber for supplementing England’s dwindling supply. Gilbert was adamant that Bavin be prepared to map at all times, and he instructed him to carry ink, quills, paper, parchment, writing tablets, and black powder to make ink. Bavin would distinguish territories on his maps using alternating hues, since his equipment included various pigments, pencils, a stone to grind colors, black lead for drawing, and other instruments and materials “to drawe cards and plotts.”Footnote 108

To ensure the accuracy of all maps and sea charts, Gilbert assigned Bavin numerous assistants, including one to mark latitudes and another to double-check each of Bavin’s reckonings. An additional crewmember would attend to him with a universal dial, a cross-staff, a sailing compass, and an ephemeris, and his final aide would attend to him with “an Instrument for the varyation of the Compass and with the Instrument for the Declynation of the nedle.” Gilbert reiterated that Bavin himself should determine the compass variation and needle declination “in every destinct place and elevacion.”Footnote 109 William Borough and instrument maker Robert Norman (fl. 1560–84) invented these navigational and surveying aids, and they explained their usage in books that appeared together in 1581: Borough’s Discourse and Norman’s New Attractive, Containing a short discourse of the Magnes or Lodestone. Together with Dee, these experienced navigators produced nine of the fifteen extant English sea charts of overseas territories dating from before 1583, and their books provided great insight on improving such charts.Footnote 110

Norman found that the magnetized needle of a vertically aligned compass attached to a free-moving pivot pointed approximately seventy-two degrees below the horizon in London. By measuring the angular distance between the horizon and needle, Norman determined the dip, or magnetic inclination, at a given location. He postulated that finding the magnetic dip at different places would allow navigators to determine latitudes and longitudes, and because his instrument did not rely upon the sun, the measurements could be taken at any time.Footnote 111 For Gilbert, the instrument represented a crucial development in his effort to create more-precise maps and sea charts, as the inability to accurately measure longitude constituted the single most pressing problem facing Renaissance navigators and chartmakers. If Norman’s device functioned as advertised, Gilbert could finally put an end to speculation about the Atlantic’s breadth.

Borough opened his text by echoing his mentor Dee. Both men advised English navigators to make their own charts and discard Iberian ones made by cartographers who had not viewed firsthand the areas on their maps. Borough blamed poor navigators rather than poor cartographers for defective maps that misplaced everything from rocks to rivers to bays. While he acknowledged the significance of Ortelius’s Theatrum in bringing together an assortment of charts, he considered many maps inadequate, singling out the 1580 world map of French intellectual Guillaume Postel. Despite Postel’s avowed brilliance, he had not been to the places that he mapped, namely the North Pole, and instead trusted “fonde dreames, and fantasticall inscriptions” as credible sources.Footnote 112

Although Norman deemed variation (the deviation of a magnetic compass needle from geographic north) too unreliable to improve navigation or mapmaking, Borough held it responsible for sea-chart errors and felt that measuring variation would improve them. He determined that many maps contained distorted coastlines and grossly inaccurate latitudes and longitudes for the Mediterranean Basin, the North Atlantic, and the Baltic Rim, among other places, because their makers did not account for variation. Mercator had largely corrected latitudinal defects in 1569, but his map, while helpful for individuals who remained on land, did not take variation into consideration and was therefore not as useful for navigators as Mercator suggested. Iberian navigators had long speculated that regularly cataloging variation would permit longitudinal measurements, because they knew that it varied by geographic location but simply assumed that it changed consistently and remained constant over time at a given place.Footnote 113 Following their lead, Borough affixed a gnomon to a standard sea compass, so that when the compass bearing was checked at noon, the shadow cast by the gnomon would show geometric north. The angular distance between geometric and true north could be recorded to track variation and to potentially determine longitude. Borough believed that his instrument was best for navigation from England “West wardes to Meta Incognita, New foundland, Florida, and that part of the coast of America,” because his experience showed that the variation remained stable when sailing this course.Footnote 114

Gilbert’s circle asked Bavin to regularly measure his variation and declination at sea and to mark it on his charts. Calculations from Borough’s and Norman’s instruments would allow Bavin to continuously catalogue his latitude and longitude at sea, and on land to assemble a series of detailed maps depicting the entire eastern seaboard. Gilbert initially planned to sail north from Florida to Cape Breton and then retrace his path back to Norumbega, mapping coastlines, rivers, and islands along the way. Each inlet needed to be explored, because Europe’s incomplete understanding of North American geography meant that every bay represented a potential opening to the Northwest Passage and Asia’s wealth. When mapping the coast, Gilbert specified that Bavin mark each map with an uppercase letter (A, B, C, and so on) so as not to confuse the label with latitude readings. As the explorers made their way farther inland, Bavin would label each map with double letters (AA, BB, CC, etc.) to ensure that he could join them together in the correct order once he completed his duties.Footnote 115

To simplify this task, Gilbert’s circle earmarked for Bavin a store of royal paper, which, along with imperial paper, was the most expensive type of paper available at the time and was therefore rarely used prior to the eighteenth century. Noted for its large size and fine quality, royal paper was used for royal decrees and other important documents, so Gilbert planned to buy some reams of it to create large, durable maps that required minimal stitching.Footnote 116 Bavin was instructed to make “plattes of the countrye” on these large sheets and then divide each map “according to the biggnes of the Table,” meaning that he would cut the paper to the size of his wooden geometrical (plain or plane) table. The geometrical table was among the most important of sixteenth-century surveying tools, and similar devices are still used today. It consisted of a simple table on a tripod that could be leveled, along with a top frame that held paper taut and in position on the tabletop. Once the paper was secured, the surveyor aligned the table to magnetic north with a compass and used its alidade or sighting rule and its distance scales to take angular measurements and distances.Footnote 117

Borough commented that “the Topographicall Instrument” (the plain table) was necessary “for taking of distances, and making descriptions vpon the land.” By correctly using the table, a compass, an astrolabe, a cross-staff, and his instrument for the variation, mariners could make a “description in platt of the coastes and countries, and of the Banckes, Rockes, and Sholdes in the Sea, with the deapthes.”Footnote 118 Hakluyt’s associate Cyprian Lucar provided instructions and illustrations for mapping with the table in his Lucarsolace (1590), and because the text included the names and locations of some vendors around London who sold the apparatus and its accoutrements, they must have been fairly common at the time.Footnote 119 By making use of Gilbert’s maneuverable pinnaces near the coast and standard surveying practices on land, Bavin could determine the location of and space between two points on a baseline. Using the angles created by these positions and a third point on land, he could calculate the distance to that point and thus map the triangular-shaped area. By continually repeating these few, simple steps, Bavin would produce “sondrye particuler cards of .4. shetes of paper Royall” measuring upwards of eleven square feet in area. Gilbert provided two varieties of binding material to fuse the sheets together: mouth glue, a type of viscid adhesive made from sugar that formed a secure bond when moistened by the tongue, and a simple gum composed of tree sap.Footnote 120 Although Gilbert had to expend more of his limited resources to acquire surveying tools, expensive paper, and binding materials, they would allow for exceptional detail and precision on Bavin’s maps.

Gilbert’s efforts would have been in vain if investors, Elizabeth, and Privy Counsellors had been unable to interpret the content of each map, so his circle devised England’s first verifiable legend of cartographic symbols to systematically display Norumbega’s features (fig. 7). It included marks for woods, hills, rocks, and the presence of channels, shelves, and rocks in rivers. Bavin would indicate the latitude and longitude of notable locations, the depths of water in fathoms, and land distances in feet, all of which would be verified by his assistants. The legend even contained symbols for indicating variation, declination, and rectified compass readings based upon Borough’s and Norman’s instruments. Gilbert insisted that Bavin maintain the same scale on each map to promote uniformity and that he save time by only drawing lines of latitude and longitude when all of his maps were complete.Footnote 121

Figure 7. Legend of map symbols within “Instructions for Gilbert’s expedition,” 1582. Additional MS 38823, fol. 2r. Courtesy of the British Library Board.

To make certain that his longitude readings were correct, Gilbert heeded Borough’s proposal for an alternate method of determining longitude at sea that improved upon dead reckoning. Borough suggested that if navigators had use of “a portable Clocke that would continue true of space for 40. or 50. houres together,” they could figure out the longitudinal distance between two locations at a given latitude within that time frame.Footnote 122 Borough remained skeptical of his plan, so Gilbert adjusted it to ensure accuracy. He sought to purchase “a flate watche clock, which doth shewe and devide the howers by the minute, and … will runne .24. howirs or .40. howers without any winding up,” while his specialists consulted an almanac that predicted a solar eclipse for London at 4:05 am on 19 June 1582.Footnote 123 They instructed Bavin to begin keeping time on 15 June by determining solar noon with a simple universal equinoctial dial, which worked at any latitude. Thereafter, Bavin would synchronize his watch to display the time for the next twenty-four hours, and he would repeat this process over the following days as he sailed west. When the eclipse occurred, he would know the time to within a minute, and with the knowledge of when it had taken place in London, he could determine his present longitude respective to the city. Gilbert’s circle also wanted Bavin to verify his findings using Borough’s and Norman’s instruments, and they told him to draw the eclipse on his sea chart. His initial measurements would serve as the foundation to estimate future longitudes at sea and would allow Bavin to make the most reliable sea charts of the era.Footnote 124

Gilbert failed to depart in 1582, so he did not get the opportunity to view the eclipse, while his almanac erred by twenty-five hours on when it would occur.Footnote 125 Furthermore, neither Gilbert nor Borough realized that variation fluctuated by both time and place, making it insufficient for determining longitude. Similarly, Norman did not understand that the earth’s magnetic field passes through its center, exits at the poles, and flows around the earth to reenter at the opposite pole. Hence, the field only runs parallel to the earth’s surface at the poles, so measuring the dip is not useful for finding longitude either. The theoretical limitations of these instruments made their practical application ineffective, but Gilbert’s attempt to use them reveals his fixation with having precise and detailed sea charts for subsequent voyages to his colony. It also shows that his coterie was familiar with the latest cartographic developments. Had they been successful in charting the Atlantic, Gilbert and his supporters would have given England a strategic advantage over its maritime competitors.

Moreover, meticulously plotting Norumbega’s features would have made it clear to anyone viewing the maps that Gilbert held authority there, as such exactness “codifies domination.”Footnote 126 Much like cartographers attempted to assert their authority by ascribing new toponyms to mapped territories, they sought to convey their knowledge of, and thus control over, that area by scrupulously surveying it. As Lesley Cormack has noted, English expansionists held an assumption that North America could be mathematically measured and named, and therefore possessed and controlled.Footnote 127 Bavin’s mapping comprised the initial steps in this process, and he and Gilbert believed that they had better skills to map the land than indigenous peoples or other Europeans. They thought that this in turn made them more fit to exploit the region. Gilbert’s maps would strengthen his claim to Norumbega and provide his supporters in England with a comprehensive view of the colony and its hinterland.

In August 1583, Bavin began crafting his grand map of the Atlantic coast at Newfoundland rather than Florida, because Gilbert’s dearth of provisions and the lateness of the sailing season forced him to take the quicker northern route across the Atlantic. At St. John’s, Bavin and other crewmen “obserued the eleuation of the pole, and drewe plattes of the countrey exactly graded” with latitude and longitude.Footnote 128 These maps and Gilbert’s formal possession ceremony gave him sufficient title to the island and gave England its first colonial territory beyond Britain. During his brief stay at Newfoundland, Gilbert also drew up passports that allowed foreign fishermen to troll his waters. Hayes reported that the mapping continued at sea between Cape Race and Sable Island, so that “the flats and dangers may be inserted in sea Cards, for warning to others that may follow the same course hereafter.”Footnote 129 Gilbert clearly wanted his maps to benefit supporting voyages to his colony and perhaps ensuing English colonizing ventures. Unfortunately, Bavin’s maps were among the “cards and plots … drawing [drawn], with the due gradation of the harbors, bays, & capes” that perished with the Delight, along with Gilbert’s books and notes, which grieved him even more than the loss of his ship and eighty crewmen.Footnote 130 The tragedy prompted Gilbert to abandon the expedition, and other maps may have gone down with him when his frigate Squirrel capsized north of the Azores.

5. Conclusion

On 3 May 2012, researchers from North Carolina’s First Colony Foundation and the British Museum in London announced the discovery of two previously hidden images on the late sixteenth-century “La Virginea Pars” map (fig. 8) of Walter Ralegh’s Roanoke Colony. Using a variety of nondestructive, transmitted light techniques, a team of conservationists, curators, and scientists determined that a patch near the bottom of the map hides a portion of the coast that was redrawn. The other patch covers a red and blue, four-sided trace italienne (star fort) at the fork of the Chowan and Roanoke Rivers. The fort may have been the destination of Roanoke’s famed “Lost Colonists,” who were last seen in 1587, and further examination of the map could provide clues to solving one of the great mysteries of English colonization history.Footnote 131

Figure 8. John White and Thomas Hariot. “La Virginea Pars,” 1586. Department of Prints and Drawings, 1906,0509.1.3. Courtesy of the Trustees of the British Museum.

Ralegh learned much about colonization while sailing on the expeditions of his elder half-brother, and Gilbert’s legacy lived on at Ralegh’s Roanoke colony in a number of ways, from its location at the mid-latitudes of North America to the thorough ethnographic studies of Algonquian culture conducted by Thomas Hariot. In place of Bavin, Ralegh enlisted Hariot and John White to map his new colony. Within weeks of their landing in September 1585, they made a preliminary sketch of the Roanoke region, the earliest extant map completed in the Americas by an Englishman.Footnote ,tsup Over the next two years the duo created the “La Virginea Pars” map and a detailed map of the eastern coastline. The latter displays Ralegh’s ships off of the coast, and the cartographers distended the Roanoke region to magnify Ralegh’s colony, much as Lok had narrowed the Atlantic to make North America more attractive. In the extreme northeastern corner of their map, Hariot and White included Gilbert’s “Noram[bega],” which is cut off by the map’s edge. The other map is an exceptionally exact depiction of Roanoke and its surroundings, complete with a scale of leagues, indications of shoals, and several Native American place names. The amended coastline epitomizes the cartographers’ concern for accuracy, and seven of Ralegh’s ships, his arms, and the royal arms firmly established ownership of the land.Footnote 133 Just as Gilbert had intended, Ralegh’s maps supported his claim to the area and advertised his colony to the English public.

When Gilbert began preparing his expedition in 1580, England controlled no territory beyond the British Isles, and North America remained a largely unknown land. Within fifty years thousands of English people had ventured west, and maps played a significant role in this exodus. For Ralegh, maps made his colony known in England and supported his authority in the region. Throughout the early seventeenth century, Jamestown investors issued an array of promotional works that contained maps, which supplemented each text and served as visual proof of the colony’s success.Footnote 134 Gilbert helped engender this chain of advances in map usage, though he was hardly alone in improving England’s map consciousness. Gilbert, Dee, Hakluyt, and their associates were taking part in a far-reaching transition that expanded well beyond a single expedition, as English cartography rapidly advanced at the end of the sixteenth century.Footnote 135

Yet their specific actions broadened the functions of maps in England’s endeavor to colonize the Americas. No longer would explorers rely solely upon foreign charts to direct their voyages. The expedition’s premature attempt to use navigational instruments to improve mapping also foreshadowed the cartographic advances of the next century. Gilbert’s promotional maps presented North America as the ideal land to accommodate the English expansion that soon followed. He showed the versatility of maps in their ability to convey vital information back to England and to solicit the support of investors and the Crown. That Gilbert failed to establish his colony makes it easy to discount his expedition, but he clearly helped establish cartography as a fundamental component of colonization.

Footnotes

*

This article derives from chapter 2 of my forthcoming PhD dissertation, and the research that made it possible was funded by fellowships from the University of Nebraska and from the Huntington Library. Professor Nancy Stara, the University of Nebraska Medieval and Renaissance Studies Program, and the University of Nebraska Department of History provided additional financial support. Thank you to my advisor, Professor Carole Levin; to my Supervisory Committee member, Professor Julia Schleck; and to the anonymous RQ readers for commenting upon versions of my essay. I am also grateful to the British Library, the British Museum, the Free Library of Philadelphia, and the Huntington Library for granting me permission to publish the illustrations that follow. All translations are my own.

1 Tyacke, 1722; Fernández-Armesto, 738.

2 Sixteenth-century cartographers customarily placed Norumbega somewhere between modern-day Nova Scotia and Connecticut.

3 Harley, 295; Helgerson, 111–16; Klinghoffer, 28–32; Sanford, 18–19; Short, 71; D. K. Smith, 9–11.

4 Anderson, 170–78; Lefebvre, 26, 31, 84–85; de Certeau, 121.

5 See Andrews; Reference BarberBarber, 2004, 188–89, 194.

6 Parks, 184; Reference BaldwinBaldwin, 2006, 105; see Reference MacMillanMacMillan, 2003, 419–22; and Ruggles, 1:218–30.

8 Klinghoffer, 78; Short, 42–43, 59–66; Reference ParryParry, 2011, 17–24; Reference ShermanSherman, 1998, 2; Aycock, 12. On Dee’s domestic connections, see Reference CormackCormack, 1997, 124–28; on his library, see Roberts and Watson.

9 British Library (hereafter BL), Cotton MS Vitellius (hereafter Cotton MS Vit.) C. VII, fol. 8r: see Reference BaldwinBaldwin, 2007, 1760; Reference KleinKlein, 2011, 244.

11 BL, Cotton MS Otho E. VIII, fol. 78r (sketch). The charts are mentioned at BL, Lansdowne (hereafter Lans.) MS 122, fol. 30r. The hydrological chart, Hatfield House Archives (hereafter HHA) Maps 69–70, no. 124, is listed at BL, Cotton MS Vit. C. VII, fol. 8v.

12 BL, Cotton MS Augustus, I.i.1; see Reference BaldwinBaldwin, 2006, 100; Reference ShermanSherman, 1999, 1:284; Ruggles, 218–19; Ganong, 113–14, 449; Reference TaylorTaylor, 1930, 122; MacMillan, 2006, 153–55; Reference BarberBarber, 2004, 191.

13 BL, Cotton MS Vit. C. VII, fol. 8v: Dee lists the map as “Atlantidis, (Vulgariter Indiae Occidentalis nominatae), emendatior descriptio quàm adhuc est divulgata - A° 1580.” He preferred the term Atlantis over America or the West Indies: see Reference DeeDee, 1842, 9. In agreement that these were the same maps, see Clulee, 292n59; Reference QuinnQuinn, 1998, 50; Ruggles, 253n113.

14 Reference DeeDee, 1842, 8. The ambiguity of Gilbert’s 1578 letters patent allowed for such a gift.

15 Ruggles, 219; Ganong, 450.

16 “Groclant Insula cuius Incolae Suedi sund Origine.”

17 BL, Cotton MS Vit. C. VII, fols. 26r–269v; BL, Additional (hereafter Add.) MS 59681, fols. 13r–21v; see BL, Cotton MS Vit. C. VII, fol. 8r; Library of Congress (hereafter LOC), David B. Quinn Papers (hereafter DBQ), Box 72, Folder 4; Reference DeeDee, 1842, 9; Reference TaylorTaylor, 1930, 122, 134–35.

18 The National Archives (hereafter TNA), Acts of the Privy Council (hereafter PC) 2/12, fol. 461r. The revocation occurred on or before 26 April 1579.

19 Sanford, 4; Gillies, 62; Harley, 289–90; Reference CormackCormack, 1997, 7–10.

20 Hakluyt, K1r, K3v.

21 Thévet, 2:fols. 1008v, 1024v; BL, Add. MS 38823, fol. 7r.

22 Thévet; Ortelius, 1–2; Crane, 231–37, plate section 1:4, 5.

23 See Fernández-Armesto, 741.

25 Reference DeeDee, 2004, 92–93.

26 BL, Cotton MS Otho E. VIII, fol. 167r; Hakluyt, K1r–K2r; BL, Add. MS 38823, fols. 7v–8r.

27 Reference DeeDee, 2004, 18–23, 52; Gilbert’s patent is reprinted in Reference QuinnQuinn, 1940, 1:188–94.

28 D. K. Smith, 8; see Padrón, 35–38.

29 Klinghoffer, 79; Reference KleinKlein, 2001, 6. “Paper Empire” is from Reference BaldwinBaldwin, 2007, 1757.

30 D. K. Smith, 65.

32 BL, Cotton Roll, XIII, 48. If Dee had, in fact, seen the chart for the first time on 20 November 1580, he would have used it as a source after his initial meeting with Elizabeth on 3 October.

33 TNA, State Papers (hereafter SP) 12/112, fol. 12r; LOC, DBQ, Box 116, Folder 3. On Fernandes, see Isil.

34 TNA, SP 89/1, fol. 10r; TNA, PC 2/11, fol. 115r; LOC, DBQ, Box 77, Folder 3.

35 The bond is reprinted in Reference Quinn, Quinn and HillierQuinn, 1979, 3:211–12.

36 TNA, SP 12/175, fol. 163r; LOC, DBQ, Box 102, Folder 17; BL, Cotton Roll, XIII, 48.

37 BL, Cotton Roll, XIII, 48; see Fernández-Armesto, 753; Tyacke, 1730.

38 De Medina, bk. 3, D4v; Bourne, O3v–P1v; Cortés, G8r–H5v; Borough, *3r.

39 See Reference KleinKlein, 2011, 231–32; Kinzel, 30–34; Tyacke, 1722.

40 Seaver, 50–55; McKown, 6–7: Walsingham needed Fernandes’s expertise for Fenton’s expedition, which had more significant national ramifications than Gilbert’s voyage.

42 HHA, Cecil Papers (hereafter CP), Map 1/69; see Ruggles, 210–12, 216; Waters, 528–29.

43 Tyacke, 1748–49.

44 Free Library of Philadelphia, Rare Books Department, Elkins Americana, no. 42. The “wizard earl,” Henry Percy, Ninth Earl of Northumberland, once owned the map, but little else is known about its provenance. See Fernández-Armesto, 742; Ganong, 453; Dee, 1564, C4r–G4r.

45 BL, Add. MS 36674, fols. 58r–62v. This manuscript’s wording links it to Dee. See LOC, DBQ, Box 77, Folder 3; Dee also praised Gilbert in his 1570 preface to Euclid at A1r; see Compton Castle, Anon., “Portrait of Humphrey Gilbert,” 1584?; National Portrait Gallery, D20541, Boissard, Sir Humphrey Gilbert, ca. 1590–1603; Reference ParryParry, 2006, 653; Clulee, 181, 289n20. The most recent assessment of Dee’s magic is Reference ParryParry, 2011: see Short, 61–66; Whitby.

46 Ruggles, 254n125, suggests that the initials refer to Dee’s apprentice, but other sources are largely silent on the subject; Tyacke, 1749, gives T. S. as the cartographer.

47 Initials alone are not enough to prove that Seckford was involved in creating Dee’s map, but his assistance is quite possible. Under Seckford’s patronage, Christopher Saxton (ca. 1542–1611) completed the first national atlas of England between 1574 and 1579. Seckford’s arms adorn many of these maps, so it would make sense that Dee would acknowledge his assistance. Both topographer William Harrison (1535–93) and chronicler Raphael Holinshed (ca. 1525–80) mentioned Seckford’s prominent role in “procuring the charts” for Holinshed’s famous Chronicles, and he knew fellow map enthusiast William Cecil from at least the early 1540s: see Helgerson, 108–11; Reference BarberBarber, 1992, 64. During the 1570s, Gilbert spent time in Ireland with Seckford and his brother Sir Henry (d. 1610), who served jointly as victuallers of the realm of Ireland for the decade ending in 1582: see TNA, SP 63/41, fol. 253r; 63/43, fol. 119r; 63/44, fol. 71r–v. Walsingham even wrote Seckford just four days before the expedition departed to ask for an injunction to have the creditors of one of Gilbert’s primary financiers silenced: see Reference Quinn, Quinn and HillierQuinn, 1979, 3:249–51; TNA, SP 15/28/1, fol. 25r, Maurice Browne to John Thynne, 1 November and 17 December 1582.

48 See Klinghoffer, 68–69; Hakluyt, ¶2r. On Lok’s map see BL, Cotton MS Otho E. VIII, fol. 41r–v; TNA, SP 12/119, fols. 67r–68r.

49 BL, Cotton MS Vit. C. VII, fol. 8v: “Hemisphærij Borealis Geographica atque Hydrographica descriptio: Longè a vulgatis Chartis diuersa: Anglis quibusdã, versus Atlantidis septentrionalia litora, Navigationem instituentibus, dono data, A° 1583.” Scholars who agree that this title refers to the Philadelphia chart include Quinn, 1997, 1:322; Reference BaldwinBaldwin, 2006, 105; Reference TaylorTaylor, 1930, 190; see also Reference ParryParry, 2011, 152–53.

50 Reference DeeDee, 2004, 83–87; see BL, Cotton MS Vit. C. VII, fols. 3r, 265v–269v. Dee also criticized those who felt that Mercator was “the only and true Author of those Aphorismes” (concise scientific definitions): see Dee, 1577, ɛ1v.

51 Ortelius, 1–2; Crane, plate section 1:4, 5.

52 Mercator titled his map Nova et aucta orbis terræ descriptio ad usum navigantium emendatè accommodata, or A New and Augmented Representation of the Lands of the Earth, Amended for the use of Navigation: see Dee, 1577, A1r; Dee, 1570, d4r.

53 Dee, 1570, d4r.

54 Gilbert, B1r–B3v, C1r, D3r, F3r–v, I1r. Gilbert’s advisor William Borough noted the same problem. See Borough, F3r–v; see also Bourne, O1v; Reference MacMillanMacMillan, 2003, 416; Reference KleinKlein, 2011, 231–32.

55 See Reference ParryParry, 2011, 24; Reference CormackCormack, 1997, 98–99; Waters, 210; Davis, G1r–K3r; Ash, 520–22.

56 See MacMillan, 2006, 155; Reference QuinnQuinn, 1997, 322; Reference QuinnQuinn, 1940, 1:67–71.

57 Klein, 2010, 239–42; Aycock, 95; and Reference QuinnQuinn, 1940, 1:67, agree that the map’s survival means that it was not used on the voyage, but Dee’s chart could have returned to England on a number of occasions; the map could have been aboard Ralegh’s Bark Ralegh, which returned to port after two days at sea. Once the expedition reconvened at Newfoundland, Gilbert sent some disgruntled crewmen back to England aboard the Swallow, and they may have carried it too. Gilbert was not aboard the Delight when it sank and may have kept the map with him aboard the Golden Hinde. He chose to sail on his trusty Squirrel during the return voyage and would not have needed the map, which could have remained on the Hinde and thus returned to England.

58 The agreement, dated 28 February 1583, is reprinted in Reference QuinnQuinn, 1940, 2:342–43.

59 Klinghoffer, 55.

60 BL, Add. MS 38823, fol. 3r.

61 E. Hayes, 684, 690–91; Clarke, 700.

62 Dee’s labels are “c: race,” “claudia,” “I Sablõ,” “c. britõ,” and “bel ile.” The curious settlement “stannata” near Cape Breton is the only other place named in the region.

63 De Villiers and Hirtle, 1–22.

64 BL, Add. MS 38823, fol. 8v; LOC, DBQ, Box 79, Folder 7; Box 120, Folder 5; Pope, 48.

65 BL, Add. MS 38823, fol. 3r; E. Hayes, 691; de Villiers and Hirtle, 17–22. Samuel de Champlain confirmed that Iberians had left cattle and pigs on the island in 1553: see de Champlain, ii–iii.

66 BL, Cotton Roll, XIII, 48; BL, Sloane MS 1447, fols. 1r–15v; TNA, SP 12/175, fol. 163r–v; Dee, 1842, 17; BL, Add. MS 48151, fols. 164v, 165v–166r.

67 In 1578 Parkhurst provided Hakluyt the elder with intelligence on Newfoundland, including information on the mineral wealth at St. John’s that may have impelled Gilbert to search there: see Parkhurst to Hakluyt, 1578, in Reference TaylorTaylor, 1935, 1:133; E. Hayes, 689–90.

68 Accounts of English corsairs spreading northward include Newberry Library (hereafter NL), Ayer MS 1236, 88. A.G.I. 54–1–15, fol. 1r; NL, Ayer MS 432 I/4. 2–5–4/12, fol. 1r; see LOC, DBQ, Box 120, Folder 10.

69 TNA, SP 12/151, fol. 86r; 78/10, fol. 120r; Clarke, 700. See Reference Quinn, Quinn and HillierQuinn, 1979, 4:13–20.

70 Hakluyt, n.p., ¶5. See Reference TaylorTaylor, 1935, 1:174–76.

71 Reference TaylorTaylor, 1951; and Reference BaldwinBaldwin, 2004, 6:670–72, agree that Borough helped write Gilbert’s instructions (BL, Add. MS 38823, fols. 1r–5v).

72 BL, Harley MS 167, fol. 69r.

73 Borough, F2v.

74 See the letters from Mendoza to King Philip II and Gabriel de Zayas between 8 May 1578 and 26 February 1579 in Reference QuinnQuinn, 1940, 1:186–94, 219. Spain also sent a spy with Frobisher in 1578.

75 Reference Quinn, Quinn and HillierQuinn, 1979, 3:251–52 (Maurice Browne to John Thynne, April or May 1583). See Croft.

76 See, for example, the various letters from Mendoza to King Philip II between 9 January 1581 and 6 May 1583 in Reference QuinnQuinn, 1940, 2:240–365.

77 Gilbert’s instructions, dated 12 December 1582, are reprinted in Reference QuinnQuinn, 1940, 2:334–35. Each ship carried two additional scrolls containing watchwords that were only to be opened after passing Ireland to prevent crewmen from divulging the words while on land: see E. Hayes, 683.

78 Gilbert, ¶¶¶¶1r, ¶¶2v; Dee, 1577, 2; BL, Cotton MS Otho E. VIII, fol. 44v; Allen, 28.

79 These include Bucke (nonextant); Churchyard, H2r–K3v; de Enciso. Gilbert is the dedicatee of the last work, as he intended to reach North America via the Caribbean.

80 Worms, 1693.

81 Lok knew Gilbert from at least 1576. See BL, Cotton MS Otho E. VIII, fol. 41r–v; Reference ShermanSherman, 1999, 1:286. Lok may have played a large role in Divers Voyages: see Reference TaylorTaylor, 1935, 1:25.

82 TNA, SP 12/119, fols. 67v–68r.

83 See MacMillan, 2006, 155–57; Klinghoffer, 30; Reference BaldwinBaldwin, 2007, 1760; Wallis, 133–37.

84 Roper, 43.

85 D’Abate, 84; Ruggles, 228–31.

86 Dee had access to Lok’s extensive map collection from 1576: see BL, Cotton MS Otho E. VIII, fol. 41r–v; TNA, SP 12/119, fols. 67v–68r. In addition to working together for the Muscovy and Cathay Companies, Lok visited Dee’s Mortlake home at least once: see Reference DeeDee, 1842, 8.

87 Hakluyt, ¶2r.

88 Klinghoffer, 103–04.

89 Payne, 29; Reference BaldwinBaldwin, 2007, 1762; D. Hayes, 14; Reference QuinnQuinn, 1967, 1:26; see Roper, 122, 125–26.

90 Dee saw the map too. See Lucar’s note “To Mr. John Dee, 1577,” at BL, Cotton MS Vit. C. VII, fol. 344r. Lucar’s papers on Thorne include BL, Lans. MS 100, fols. 65r–80v; and BL Cotton MS Vit. C. VII, fols. 329r–341v. See also HHA, CP 245/5; Hakluyt, Dee, Lok, and Cecil all had copies of some of Thorne’s papers and potentially the map. See Reference BaldwinBaldwin, 2006, 113, 128n71; Reference QuinnQuinn, 1997, 303.

91 Hakluyt, n.p.: see Roper, 122.

92 At least twenty-one copies of Divers Voyages exist, a fairly large number compared with extant copies of similar promotional tracts. Hakluyt may have produced his maps independently, since many copies of the book lack one or both of them. Such evidence suggests that Hakluyt printed a moderate number of both the maps and the book, which could be provided separately or in tandem to prospective investors based upon their preference: see Neville-Sington and Payne, 8, 26–31.

93 LOC, DBQ, Box 102, Folder 10; Payne, 7; Neville-Sington and Payne, 30–33; see TNA, PC 1/13, fols. 539r, 563r. Brudenell’s agreement is reprinted in Reference QuinnQuinn, 1940, 2:257–60.

94 Reference Quinn, Quinn and HillierQuinn, 1979, 3:264 (Sidney to Sir Edward Stafford, 21 July 1584).

95 Gilbert’s pacts with Sidney, Gerrard, and Peckham are reprinted in Reference QuinnQuinn, 1940, 2:245–66.

96 Reference Quinn, Quinn and HillierQuinn, 1979, 3:264 (Sidney to Sir Edward Stafford, 21 July 1584).

97 See TNA, SP 12/161, fols. 118r–125v; 12/165, fol. 102r.

98 Quinn and Cheshire, 189–91 (Maurice Browne to John Thynne, 6 July 1582). Browne’s expert was certainly Dee, since the man found no errors on the Portuguese map aside from the north part of America, an area that Dee had mapped several times. Dee made it clear that the northern region had to be guesswork, because years earlier Spain had forbidden its sailors from going beyond an unspecified northern degree. He had used the same line of argument to convince Elizabeth of her right to all of America north of forty-five degrees north.

99 E. Hayes, 684; Quinn and Cheshire, 194–95, 40, 46 (Maurice Browne to John Thynne, 20 August 1582).

100 Reference QuinnQuinn, 1967, 1:33–34; Neville-Sington and Payne, 28.

101 Harley, 312.

102 On mapping and English colonization, see Tomlins, 324–28; Schmidt; Koch.

103 Quinn and Cheshire, 194 (Maurice Browne to John Thynne, 6 July 1582).

104 BL, Lans. MS 98, fol. 4r.

105 The instructions are reprinted in Reference QuinnQuinn, 1940, 2:257–60.

106 BL, Add. MS 38823, fol. 1r–v.

107 Bavin has heretofore been unidentified, though Reference Quinn, Quinn and HillierQuinn, 1979, 3:239, hints that he may have been the son of Thomas Bavand of Liverpool or of the Chester family of that name. Because Bavand (Bavan, Bavard), a well-known merchant and one-time mayor of Liverpool, was involved in military operations in Ireland and knew government officials, including Lord Burghley, Sir Edward Fitton (1527–79), and Sir Nicholas Malby (1530–84), it was more likely he than his son who went with Gilbert. His letters display superb penmanship but provide few clues about his reputation as a surveyor or cartographer. Like John White, he was probably an artist, since he was instructed to complete a number of paintings, and at the time art and cartography overlapped. On Bavin’s instructions, see Reference TaylorTaylor, 1951; Waters, 538–40; Sloan, 42–44; LOC, DBQ, Box 71, Folder 6; Box 79, Folder 7. On his governmental associations see TNA, SP 63/59, fols. 113r–114v; TNA, PC 2/12, fol. 62r; on his mercantile connections see TNA, SP 63/76, fol. 146r; 63/77, fol. 112r; 63/78, fols. 21r, 45r–v, 81r, 149r, 151r; 63/79, fols. 11r–14r, 40r, 43r.

108 BL, Add. MS 38823, fols. 3v–5v.

109 Ibid., fols. 1v–2r, 3v.

110 Tyacke, 1748–49.

111 Norman, C3v–D1v.

112 Borough, *4r–A1r. Borough was probably referring to Postel’s woodcut polar planisphere Polo Aptata Nova Charta Universi Auth. Guil. Postello (Paris, 1581), now at the Bibliotheque nationale in Paris.

113 Borough, E3r–E4r; ibid., F2r; Cormack, 2005, 189.

114 Borough, *2r, G3r.

115 BL, Add. MS 38823, fols. 3v–5r.

116 In 1604 a ream of brown paper cost one shilling and a ream of royal paper cost nearly seven times as much at 6s. 8d. Royal paper measured approximately 440 x 600 mm and imperial paper was about 700 x 500 mm. Paper could not be much larger than that, as it was made by shaking a tray of the paper’s length, and an average man’s reach was 700 mm. See Bland, 30–31.

117 Turner, 43–44.

118 Borough, *3r–*4r.

119 Lucar, 9–20, 42–45.

120 BL, Add. MS 38823, fols. 3v, 5r; Turner, 43–44; Moran, 163; on the triangulation mapping method, see Leigh, O3r–P2r; Lucar, 9–20, 50; Sloan, 104–05.

121 BL, Add. MS 38823, fols. 3v–5v.

122 Borough, D1v–D2r.

123 Gilbert apparently used Evans Lloyd’s fairly inaccurate 1582 almanac: see Lloyd, C1v.

124 BL, Add. MS 38823, fol 4r.

125 The eclipse occurred at Cambridge just after 5:00 am on 20 June 1582, rather than 19 June at 4:05 am as Lloyd suggested: see Lloyd, C1v; Harvey, 56.

126 McLeod, 232.

127 Klinghoffer, 32; Reference CormackCormack, 1997, 7–16.

128 E. Hayes, 688.

129 Ibid., 691. By “flats and dangers” Hayes simply meant shallows, shoals, and other impediments.

130 Ibid., 688–93: an example of Gilbert’s passport is at NL, Ayer MS 1236, fols. 1r–2v.

131 British Museum, Department of Prints and Drawings, 1906,0509.1.3; Ambers et al.

132 TNA, Maps and Plans 1/584 extracted from Colonial Office 1/1.

133 British Museum, Department of Prints and Drawings, 1906,0509.1.2; British Museum, Department of Prints and Drawings, 1906,0509.1.3; see Reference BaldwinBaldwin, 2007, 1765–66; Sloan, 96–97, 104–05.

134 J. Smith, 1612, *4v–*5v; J. Smith, 1624, 21–22, 40–41, 102–03.

135 See Reference BaldwinBaldwin, 2007; Reference BarberBarber, 1992; Helgerson, 107–47; Gillies; Reference KleinKlein, 2001; Sanford; D. K. Smith.

References

Bibliography

Manuscript and Archival Sources

British Library (BL), London, Additional MS 36674, fols. 58r–62v. Dee, John. “Certaine straung visions, or apparitions of memorable note.” 1567. Cited as BL, Add. MS 36674.Google Scholar
BL, London, Additional MS 38823, fols. 1r–8v. Anon. “Instructions for a voyage of discovery.” 1582. Cited as BL, Add. MS 38823.Google Scholar
BL, London, Additional MS 48151, fols. 161r–166r. Hakluyt, Richard. “Sondrie Reportes of ye contrie which Sir Humfrie Gilberte goeth to discover.” 1582. Cited as BL, Add. MS 48151.Google Scholar
BL, London, Additional MS 59681, fols. 13r–21v. Dee, John. “Her Maiesties Title Royall, to many forayn Cuntries.” 1578. Cited as BL, Add. MS 59681.Google Scholar
BL, London, Cotton MS Augustus, I.i.1. Dee, John. “Ioannes Dee. Anno, 1580.” Cited as BL, Cotton MS Augustus.Google Scholar
BL, London, Cotton MS Otho E. VIII, fols. 41r–54v. Lok, Michael. “Sir Martin Frobisher’s voyage for the discovery of a passage towards Cathay.” 1576. Cited as BL, Cotton MS Otho E. VIII.Google Scholar
BL, London, Cotton MS Otho E. VIII, fols. 77v–80v. Dee, John. “Some directions for a voyage to Cathay by the North Seas, signed by John Dee: with a small chart.” 1580. Cited as BL, Cotton MS Otho E. VIII.Google Scholar
BL, London, Cotton MS Otho E. VIII, fol. 167r. Hakluyt, Richard. “An account of a country between 35° and 45° latitude fit for a settlement.” 1584? Cited as BL, Cotton MS Otho E. VIII.Google Scholar
BL, London, Cotton Roll, XIII, 48. Fernandes, Simão. “The Cownterfet of Mr. Fernando Simon his Sea carte which he lent unto my Master at Mortlake. Ao. 1580. Novemb. 20. The same Fernando Simon is a Portugale, and borne in Tercera being one of the Iles called AZORES.” 1580. Cited as BL, Cotton Roll.Google Scholar
BL, London, Cotton MS Vitellius C. VII, fols. 1r–14r. Dee, John. “John Dee’s account of his life; addressed to two commissioners, sent to him by the queen; written by himself.” 1592. Cited as BL, Cotton MS Vit. C. VII.Google Scholar
BL, London, Cotton MS Vitellius C. VII, fols. 26r–269v. Dee, John. “Of famous and rich discoveries.” 1577. Cited as BL, Cotton MS Vit. C. VII.Google Scholar
BL, London, Cotton MS Vitellius C. VII, fols. 329r–345r. Thorne, Robert. “Robert Thorne to King Henry VIII’s Ambassador in Spain.” 1527. Cited as BL, Cotton MS Vit. C. VII.Google Scholar
BL, London, Harley MS 167, fols. 39r–74r. Borough, Stephen and William. “A Book teaching the Art of Navigation.” 1579? Cited as BL, Harley MS 167.Google Scholar
BL, London, Lansdowne MS 98, fols. 1r–7v. Gilbert, Humphrey. “The erection of an Academy in London for education of her Majesty’s Wardes and other the youth of nobility and gentlemen.” 1570? Cited as BL, Lans. MS 98.Google Scholar
BL, London, Lansdowne MS 100, fols. 65r–80v. Thorne, Robert. “The booke made by the worshipfull master Robert Thorne in Anno. 1527.” Cited as BL, Lans. MS 100.Google Scholar
BL, London, Lansdowne MS 122, fol. 30r–v. Dee, John. “Instructions for the two Masters, Charles Jackman and Arthur Pett.” 17 May 1580. Cited as BL, Lans. MS 122.Google Scholar
BL, London, Sloane MS 1447, fols. 1r–15v. Anon. “Travels of David Ingram.” 1582? Cited as BL, Sloane MS 1447.Google Scholar
British Museum, London, Department of Prints and Drawings, 1906,0509.1.2. White, John, and Thomas Hariot. “La Virgenia Pars.” 1587?Google Scholar
British Museum, London, Department of Prints and Drawings, 1906,0509.1.3. White, John, and Thomas Hariot. “La Virginea Pars.” 1586?Google Scholar
Compton Castle, Compton, Devon. Anon. “Portrait of Humphrey Gilbert.” 1584?Google Scholar
Free Library of Philadelphia, Rare Book Department, Elkins Americana, no. 42. Dee, John, and T. S. “Sr Humfray Gylbert Knight his charte.” 1583.Google Scholar
Hatfield House Archives (HHA), Hatfield, Cecil Papers, Map 1/69. Borough, William. “The first of June 1576. By W : Borough.” Cited as HHA, CP, Map 1/69.Google Scholar
HHA, Hatfield, Maps 69–70, no. 124. Dee, John. “Hydrographical chart.” 1580. Cited as HHA, Maps 6970.Google Scholar
HHA, Hatfield, Cecil Papers 245/5. Thorne, Robert. “A declaration of the Indies … by Robert Throne.” 1527. Cited as HHA, CP 245/5.Google Scholar
Library of Congress, Washington, DC, David B. Quinn Papers: Box 71, Folder 6; Box 72, Folder 4; Box 77, Folder 3; Box 79, Folder 7; Box 102, Folders 10, 17; Box 116, Folder 3; Box 120, Folders 5, 10. Cited as LOC, DBQ.Google Scholar
The National Archives (TNA), Kew, Acts of the Privy Council, 1/13, fols. 539, 563; 2/11, fol. 115; 2/12, fols. 62, 99, 395, 451, 461, 683. Cited as TNA, PC.Google Scholar
TNA, Kew, Maps and Plans 1/584 extracted from Colonial Office 1/1. Cited as TNA, Maps and Plans 1/584.Google Scholar
TNA, Kew, State Papers 12/112, fol. 12r; 12/119, fols. 67–68; 12/139, fol. 158; 12/151, fol. 86; 12/161, fols. 118–25; 12/165, fols. 102, 175; 12/175, fols. 10, 163; 15/28/1, fol. 25; 63/41, fol. 253; 63/43, fol. 119; 63/44, fol. 71; 63/59, fols. 113–14; 63/76, fol. 146; 63/77, fol. 112; 63/78, fols. 21, 45, 81, 149, 151; 63/79, fols. 11, 13, 14, 40, 43; 75/1, fols. 21, 60; 78/10, fol. 120; 89/1, fol. 10. Cited as TNA, SP.Google Scholar
National Portrait Gallery, London, D20541. Boissard, Robert. Sir Humphrey Gilbert, line engraving, ca. 15901603.Google Scholar
Newberry Library (NL), Chicago, Ayer MS 432 I/4. 2–5–4/12, fol. 1r. Account of Pedro Menendez. 12 September 1580. Cited as NL, Ayer MS 432.Google Scholar
NL, Chicago, Ayer MS 1236, fols. 12. Gilbert, Humphrey. “Passport to Portuguese Thomas Andres of Avero.” 7 August 1583; Gonçallo Estevez to King Philip II. 1583. Cited as NL, Ayer MS 1236.Google Scholar
NL, Chicago, Ayer MS 1236, 88. A.G.I. 54–115, fol. 1r. Gabriel de Luxan to King Philip II. 27 February 1582. Cited as NL, Ayer MS 1236.Google Scholar

Printed Sources

Allen, John L. “The Indrawing Sea: Imagination and Experience in the Search for the Northwest Passage, 1497–1632.” In American Beginnings (1994), 735.Google Scholar
Ambers, Janet, Joanna Russell, David Saunders, and Alice Rugheimer. “Examination of Patches on a Map of the East Coast of North America by John White” (‘La Virginea Pars’; 1906,0509.1.3).” The British Museum Department of Conservation and Scientific Research (CSR Analytical Request No. AR2012–21). http://www.firstcolonyfoundation.org/news/british_museum_findings.pdf.Google Scholar
American Beginnings: Exploration, Culture, and Cartography in the Land of Norumbega. Ed. Emerson W. Baker, Edwin A. Churchill, Richard S. D’Abate, Kristine L. Jones, et al. Lincoln, 1994.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London, 1993.Google Scholar
Andrews, J. H.Colonial Cartography in a European Setting: The Case of Tudor Ireland.” In History of Cartography (2007), 3.2:1670–83.Google Scholar
Ash, Eric H. “Navigation Techniques and Practice in the Renaissance.” In History of Cartography (2007), 3.1:509–27.Google Scholar
Aycock, Beth Hamilton. “Edging Toward Empire: John Dee, Richard Hakluyt, Humphrey Gilbert, and the Beginning of the British Empire in the Elizabethan Era.” MA thesis, Tarleton State University, 2005.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Robert. “William Borough.” In Oxford Dictionary (2004), 6:670–72.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Robert. “John Dee’s Interest in the Application of Natural Science, Mathematics and Law to English Naval Affairs.” In John Dee: Interdisciplinary Studies in English Renaissance Thought, ed. Stephen Clucas, 97130. Dordrecht, 2006.10.1007/1-4020-4246-9_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Robert. “Colonial Cartography under the Tudor and Early Stuart Monarchies, ca. 1480–ca. 1640.” In History of Cartography (2007), 3.2:1754–80.Google Scholar
Barber, Peter. “England II: Monarchs, Ministers, and Maps, 1550–1625.” In Monarchs, Ministers, and Maps: The Emergence of Cartography as a Tool of Government in Early Modern Europe, ed. David Buisseret, 5798. Chicago, 1992.Google Scholar
Barber, Peter. “Was Elizabeth I Interested in Maps — and Did It Matter?Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 14, 6th ser. (2004): 185–98.Google Scholar
Bland, Mark. A Guide to Early Printed Books and Manuscripts. Chichester, 2010.10.1002/9781444317855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borough, William. A Discovrs of the Variation of the Cumpas, or Magneticall Needle. Wherin is Mathematically shewed, the maner of the obseruation, effectes, and application thereof. London, 1581.Google Scholar
Bourne, William. A Regiment for the Sea, Conteining very necessary matters, for all sorts of Sea-men and Trauailers, as Masters of ships, Pilots, Mariners & Marchaunts. London, 1580.Google Scholar
Bucke, Paul. Praier for Sir Humfrey Gilberte. London[?], 1578.Google Scholar
Churchyard, Thomas. A discourse of the Queenes Majesties entertainement in Suffolk and Norffolk … whereunto is adjoyned a commendation of Sir H. Gilberts ventrous journey. London, 1578.Google Scholar
Clarke, Richard. “A relation of Richard Clarke of Weymouth, master of the shippe called the Delight, going for the discouerie of Norumbega with Sir Humfrey Gilbert 1583.” In Principal Navigations (1589), 700–01.Google Scholar
Clulee, Nicholas H. John Dee’s Natural Philosophy: Between Science and Religion. New York, 1988.Google Scholar
Cormack, Lesley B. Charting an Empire: Geography at the English Universities, 1580–1620. Chicago, 1997.Google Scholar
Cormack, Lesley B.Mathematics and Empire: The Military Impulse and the Scientific Revolution.” In The Heirs of Archimedes: Science and the Art of War through the Age of Enlightenment, ed. Brett D. Steele and Tamera Dorland, 181203. Cambridge, MA, 2005.Google Scholar
Cortés, Martín. The Arte of Nauigation, conteynyng a compendious description of the Sphere, with the making of certayne Insturmentes and rules for Nauigations, and exemplified by many Demonstrations. Trans. Richard Eden. London, 1579.Google Scholar
Crane, Nicholas. Mercator: The Man Who Mapped the Planet. New York, 2003.Google Scholar
Croft, Pauline. “Henry Howard.” In Oxford Dictionary (2004), 28:366–67.Google Scholar
D’Abate, Richard. “On the Meaning of a Name: ‘Norumbega’ and the Representation of North America.” In American Beginnings (1994), 6188.Google Scholar
Davis, John. The Seamans Secrets, Deuided into 2. Partes, wherein is taught the three kindes of Sayling, Horizontall, Paradoxall, and sayling vpon a great Circle. London, 1595.Google Scholar
Certeau, de, Michel, . The Practice of Everyday Life. Trans. Rendall, Steven. Berkeley, 1984.Google Scholar
Champlain, de, Samuel, . Narrative of a Voyage to the West Indies and Mexico in the Years 1599–1602. Ed. Norton Shaw. Trans. Alice Wilmere. London, 1859.Google Scholar
Dee, John. Monas Hieroglyphica, Ioannis Dee, Londinensis, Maximilianvm, Dei Gratia Romanorvm, Bohemiæ et Hvngariæ Regem Sapientissimvm. Antwerp, 1564.Google Scholar
Dee, John. “Mathematicall Præface.” In The Elements of Geometrie of the most auncient Phlosopher Evclide of Megara, Euclid, trans. H. Billingsley, *1r–A4v. London, 1570.Google Scholar
Dee, John. General and Rare Memorials pertayning to the Perfect Arte of Navigation. London, 1577.Google Scholar
Dee, John. The Private Diary of Dr. John Dee, and the Catalogue of His Library Manuscripts. Ed. James O. Halliwell. London, 1842.Google Scholar
Dee, John. The Limits of the British Empire. Ed. Ken MacMillan with Jennifer Abeles. Westport, 2004.Google Scholar
Enciso, de, Fernández, Martin. A briefe description of the portes, creekes, bayes, and hauens, of the Weast India. Trans. John Frampton. London, 1578.Google Scholar
Medina, de, Pedro, . The Arte of Nauigation wherein is contained all the rules, declarations, secretes, & aduises, which for good Nauigation are necessarie. Trans. Frampton, John. London, 1581.Google Scholar
Villiers, de, Marq, , and Hirtle, Sheila. Sable Island: The Strange Origins and Curious History of a Dune Adrift in the Atlantic. New York, 2004.Google Scholar
Felipe, Fernández-Armesto. “Maps and Exploration in the Sixteenth and Early Seventeenth Centuries.” In History of Cartography (2007), 3.1:738–71.Google Scholar
Ganong, William. Crucial Maps in Early Cartography and Place-Nomenclature of the Atlantic Coast of Canada. Toronto, 1964.10.3138/9781487595661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Humphrey. A discourse of a discouerie for a new passage to Cataia. London, 1576.Google Scholar
Gillies, John. Shakespeare and the Geography of Difference. Cambridge, 1994.Google Scholar
Hakluyt, Richard. Divers Voyages touching the Discoverie of America, and the Ilands adjacent. London, 1582.Google Scholar
Harley, J. B.Maps, Knowledge, and Power.” In The Iconography of Landscape: Essays on the Symbolic Representation, Design and Use of Past Environments, ed. Denis Cosgrove and Stephen Daniels, 277312. Cambridge, 1988.Google Scholar
Harvey, Richard. An Astrological Discourse vpon the great and notable Coniunction of the tvvo superior Planets, Satvrne & Jvpiter. London, 1583.Google Scholar
Hayes, Derek. Historical Atlas of the Pacific Northwest, Maps of Exploration and Discovery: British Columbia, Washington, Oregon, Alaska, Yukon. Seattle, 1999.Google Scholar
Hayes, Edward. “A report of the voyage and successe thereof, attempted in the yeere of our Lord, 1583. by Sir Humfrey Gilbert knight.” In Principal Navigations (1589), 679–97.Google Scholar
Helgerson, Richard. Forms of Nationhood: The Elizabethan Writing of England. Chicago, 1992.Google Scholar
The History of Cartography. Ed. J. B. Harley, David Woodward, and G. Malcolm Lewis. 3 vols. Chicago, 19872007.Google Scholar
Isil, Olivia A. “Simon Fernandez, Master Mariner and Roanoke Assistant: A New Look at an Old Villain.” In Searching for the Roanoke Colonies: An Interdisciplinary Collection, ed. E. Thomson Shields, Jr. and Charles R. Ewen, 6681. Raleigh, 2003.Google Scholar
Kinzel, Ulrich. “Orientation as a Paradigm of Maritime Modernity.” In Fictions of the Sea: Critical Perspectives on the Ocean in British Literature and Culture, ed. Bernhard Klein, 2848. Aldershot, 2002.Google Scholar
Klein, Bernhard. Maps and the Writing of Space in Early Modern England and Ireland. Houndmills, 2001.10.1057/9780230598119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Bernhard. “Mapping the Waters: Sea Charts, Navigation, and Camões’s Os Lusíadas .” Renaissance Studies 25.2 (2011): 228–47.10.1111/j.1477-4658.2010.00673.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinghoffer, Arthur Jay. The Power of Projections: How Maps Reflect Global Politics and History. Westport, 2006.Google Scholar
Koch, Mark. “Ruling the World: The Cartographic Gaze in Elizabethan Accounts of the New World.” Early Modern Literary Studies 4.2, Special Issue 3 (1998): 11.1–39. http://purl.oclc.org/emls/04-2/kochruli.htm.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri. The Production of Space. Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith. Oxford, 1991.Google Scholar
Leigh, Valentine. The Moste Profitable and commendable Science, of Surveiyng of Landes, Tenementes, and Herditamentes… . London, 1578.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Evans. An Almanacke and Prognostication for the yeere of our Lord M.D.LXXII. London, 1582.Google Scholar
Lucar, Cyprian. A Treatise Named Lvcarsolace Devided into Fovver Bookes. London, 1590.Google Scholar
MacMillan, Ken. “Sovereignty ‘More Plainly Described’: Early English Maps of North America, 1580–1625.” Journal of British Studies 42.4 (2003): 413–47.10.1086/376461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacMillan, Ken. Sovereignty and Possession in the English New World: The Legal Foundations of Empire, 1576–1640. Cambridge, 2006.Google Scholar
McKown, Elspeth. “Imagining ‘An Other England’ in the North Atlantic, 15771625.” MA thesis, Dalhousie University, 2011.Google Scholar
McLeod, Bruce. The Geography of Empire in English Literature, 1580–1745. Cambridge, 1999.Google Scholar
Meta Incognita: A Discourse of Discovery. Martin Frobisher’s Arctic Expeditions, 1576–1578. Ed. Symons, Thomas H. B. with Stephen Alsford and Chris Kitzan. 2 vols. Hull, 1999.Google Scholar
Moran, Michael G.Renaissance Surveying Techniques and the 1590 Hariot-White-de Bry Map of Virginia.” In Three Keys to the Past: The History of Technical Communication, ed. Teresa C. Kynell and Michael G. Moran, 153–70. Stamford, 1999.Google Scholar
Neville-Sington, Pamela A., and Payne, Anthony. An Interim Census of Surviving Copies of Hakluyt’s Divers Voyages and Principal Navigations. London, 1997.Google Scholar
Norman, Robert. The new Attractiue, Containyng a short discourse of the Magnes or Lodestone, and amongest other his vertues, of a newe discouered secret and subtill propertie, concernyng the Declinyng of the Needle, touched therewith under the plaine of the Horizon. London, 1581.Google Scholar
Ortelius, Abraham. Theatrum Orbis Terrarum. Antwerp, 1570.Google Scholar
The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Ed. H. C. G. Matthew and Brian Harrison. 60 vols. Oxford, 2004.Google Scholar
Padrón, Ricardo. The Spacious Word: Cartography, Literature, and Empire in Early Modern Spain. Chicago, 2004.Google Scholar
Parks, George. Richard Hakluyt and the English Voyages. New York, 1928.Google Scholar
Parry, Glyn. “John Dee and the Elizabethan British Empire in its European Context.” Historical Journal 49.3 (2006): 643–75.10.1017/S0018246X06005462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, Glyn. The Arch Conjuror of England: John Dee. New Haven, 2011.Google Scholar
Payne, Anthony. Richard Hakluyt: A Guide to His Books and to Those Associated with Him 1580–1625. London, 2008.Google Scholar
Pope, Peter E.. Fish into Wine: The Newfoundland Plantation in the Seventeenth Century. Chapel Hill, 2004.Google Scholar
The Principal Navigations, Voiages and Discoveries of the English Nation. Ed. Richard Hakluyt. London, 1589.Google Scholar
Quinn, David B., ed. The Voyages and Colonising Enterprises of Sir Humphrey Gilbert. 2 vols. London, 1940.Google Scholar
Quinn, David B., ed. Richard Hakluyt, Editor: A Study Introductory of the Facsimile Edition of Richard Hakluyt’s Divers Voyages, 1582, to which is Added a Facsimile of A shorte and briefe narration of the two navigations to Newe Fraunce. 2 vols. Amsterdam, 1967.Google Scholar
Quinn, David B., ed, Quinn, Alison M.. and Hillier, Susan. New American World. 5 vols. New York, 1979.Google Scholar
Quinn, David B. “The Northwest Passage in Theory and Practice.” In North American Exploration, ed. John Logan Allen, 1:292343. Lincoln, 1997.Google Scholar
Quinn, David B.. European Approaches to North America, 1450–1640. Aldershot, 1998.Google Scholar
Quinn, David B., and Cheshire, Neil M.., eds and The New Found Land of Stephen Parmenius: The Life and Writings of a Hungarian Poet, Drowned on a Voyage from Newfoundland, 1583. Toronto, 1972.Google Scholar
Roberts, Julian, and Watson, Andrew G., eds. John Dee’s Library Catalogue. London, 1990.Google Scholar
Roper, Stephanie Abbot. “Paper Conquests: Early Modern English Mapping of North America as Promotional Tools.” PhD diss., University of Kansas, 1998.Google Scholar
Ruggles, Richard I. “The Cartographic Lure of the Northwest Passage: Its Real and Imaginary Geography.” In Meta Incognita (1999), 1:179256.10.2307/j.ctt22zmdxs.15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanford, Rhonda Lemke. Maps and Memory in Early Modern England: A Sense of Place. Houndmills, 2002.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Benjamin. “Mapping an Empire: Cartographic and Colonial Rivalry in Seventeenth-Century Dutch and English North America.” William and Mary Quarterly 54.3, 3rd ser. (1997): 549–78.Google Scholar
Seaver, Kirsten A. “Norumbega and ‘Harmonia Mundi’ in Sixteenth-Century Cartography.” Imago Mundi 50 (1998): 3458.10.1080/03085699808592878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, William H. “Putting the British Seas on the Map: John Dee’s Imperial Cartography.” Cartographica 35.3–4 (1998): 110.Google Scholar
Sherman, William H.. “John Dee’s Role in Martin Frobisher’s Northwest Enterprise.” In Meta Incognita (1999), 1:283–98.Google Scholar
Short, John Rennie. Making Space: Revisioning the World, 1475–1600. Syracuse, 2004.Google Scholar
Sloan, Kim. A New World: England’s First View of America. Chapel Hill, 2007.Google Scholar
Smith, D. K.. The Cartographic Imagination in Early Modern England: Re-Writing the World in Marlowe, Spenser, Raleigh and Marvell. Aldershot, 2008.Google Scholar
Smith, John. A Map of Virginia. With A Description of the Covntrey, the Commodities, People, Government and Religion. Oxford, 1612.Google Scholar
Smith, John. The Generall Historie of Virginia, New-England and the Summer Isles with the names of the Adventurers, Planters, and Governours from their first beginning An: 1584 to this present 1624. London, 1624.Google Scholar
Taylor, Eva. Tudor Geography, 1485–1583. London, 1930.Google Scholar
Taylor, Eva, ed. The Original Writings and Correspondence of the Two Richard Hakluyts. 2 vols. London, 1935.Google Scholar
Taylor, Eva. “Instructions to a Colonial Surveyor in 1582.” Mariner’s Mirror 37.1 (1951): 4862.10.1080/00253359.1951.10658061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thévet, André. La cosmographie vniverselle d’andré thevet cosmographe dv roy. illvstree de diverses figvres des choses plvs remarqvables vevës par l’ Auteur, & incogneuës de noz Anciens & Modernes. 2 vols. Paris, 1575.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher. “The Legal Cartography of Colonization, the Legal Polyphony of Settlement: English Intrusions on the American Mainland in the Seventeenth Century.” Law & Social Inquiry 26.2 (2001): 315–72.10.1111/j.1747-4469.2001.tb00181.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Gerard L'estrange. Scientific Instruments, 1500–1900: An Introduction. London, 1998.Google Scholar
Tyacke, Sarah. “Chartmaking in England and Its Context.” In History of Cartography (2007), 3.2:1722–53.Google Scholar
Wallis, Helen. “The Cartography of Drake’s Voyage.” In Sir Francis Drake and the Famous Voyage, 1577–1580, Essays Commemorating the Quadricentennial of Drake’s Circumnavigation of the Earth, ed. Norman J. W. Thrower, 121–63. Berkeley, 1984.Google Scholar
Waters, David. The Art of Navigation in England in Elizabethan and Early Stuart Times. New Haven, 1958.Google Scholar
Whitby, Christopher Lionel. “John Dee’s Actions with Spirits: 22 December 1581 to 23 May 1583.” PhD diss., University of Birmingham, 1981.Google Scholar
Worms, Laurence. “The London Map Trade to 1640.” In History of Cartography (2007), 3.2:16931721.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. John Dee. “Ioannis Dee, Anno 1580,” 1580 (detail). Cotton MS Augustus, I.i.1. Courtesy of the British Library Board.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Simão Fernandes. “The Cownterfet of Mr. Fernando Simon his Sea carte which he lent unto my Master at Mortlake. Ao. 1580. Novemb. 20. The same Fernando Simon is a Portugale, and borne in Tercera being one of the Iles called AZORES,” 1580 (detail). Cotton Roll, XIII, 48. Courtesy of the British Library Board.

Figure 2

Figure 3. John Dee. “Sr Humfray Gylbert Knight his charte,” 1583 (detail). Rare Book Division, Elkins Americana, no. 42. Courtesy of the Free Library of Philadelphia.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Hieronimo da Verrazano. “Untitled map,” 1529 (detail). In Giovanni Battista Ramusio, Terzo Volvme Delle Navigationi et Viaggi Nel Qvale Si Contengono, 424–25. Venice, 1556. Courtesy of the Huntington Library.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Humphrey Gilbert. “A General Map made onelye for the Particvler Declaration of this Discovery.” In A discourse of a discouerie for a new passage to Cataia. London, 1576. Courtesy of the Huntington Library.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Michael Lok. “Illvstri viro, Domino Philippo Sidnæo Michael Lok Civis Londinensis Hanc Chartam Dedicabat: .1582” (detail). In Richard Hakluyt, Divers Voyages touching the Discoverie of America, and the Ilands adjacent. London, 1582. Courtesy of the Huntington Library.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Legend of map symbols within “Instructions for Gilbert’s expedition,” 1582. Additional MS 38823, fol. 2r. Courtesy of the British Library Board.

Figure 7

Figure 8. John White and Thomas Hariot. “La Virginea Pars,” 1586. Department of Prints and Drawings, 1906,0509.1.3. Courtesy of the Trustees of the British Museum.