There were errors in Figures 3, 4 and 6 in the paper by S. Doyle (Reference Shane2008) for which the author and editors apologize. During the transfer of the graphs between different programs, the software automatically reconfigured the y axes so that the totals appeared in numerical rather than percentage format. This resulted in the name category totals being represented as, for example, 0·1, 0·2, 0·3 rather than 10%, 20%, 30%, etc. The correct version of Figures 3, 4 and 6 are given below.
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary-alt:20160615162923-08713-mediumThumb-S002185370900423X_fig1g.jpg?pub-status=live)
Fig. 3. The changing frequency of religious names.
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary-alt:20160615162929-12435-mediumThumb-S002185370900423X_fig2g.jpg?pub-status=live)
Fig. 4. The frequency of mortality-related names in colonial Bunyoro.
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary-alt:20160615162928-36089-mediumThumb-S002185370900423X_fig3g.jpg?pub-status=live)
Fig. 6. The frequency of mortality-related names in postcolonial Bunyoro.