Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T16:54:19.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spectral line enhancements as signatures for stellar activity: AD Leonis – an example

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2010

M. Leitzinger*
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics/IGAM, University of Graz, Austria
P. Odert
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics/IGAM, University of Graz, Austria
A. Hanslmeier
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics/IGAM, University of Graz, Austria
I. Ribas
Affiliation:
Institut d'Estudis de Espacials de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
A.A. Konovalenko
Affiliation:
Institute of Radio Astronomy, Ukrainian Academy of Sciences, Kharkov, Ukraine
M. Vanko
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Tatranska Lomnica, Slovakia
H. Lammer
Affiliation:
Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Graz, Austria
M.L. Khodachenko
Affiliation:
Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Graz, Austria
H.O. Rucker
Affiliation:
Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Graz, Austria
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A high level of stellar activity in the form of frequent flaring and frequent mass ejections can lead to the total loss of exoplanetary atmospheres due to evaporation and erosion. Simulations have shown such scenarii for close-in exoplanets orbiting M-stars. Information on stellar flaring activity is accessible more easily than information on stellar mass ejections, simply due to the difference in detection. In the National Aeronautics and Space Administration/Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer spectra of the dM star AD Leonis we find an interesting event lasting for only one spectrum. The first component of the OVI (103.19 nm, 103.76 nm) duplet shows an enhancement of the blue wing, shifted by about 90 km s−1. This event occurred one spectrum after a flare. We discuss several solar/stellar phenomena that might produce such a spectral feature and could therefore explain this event.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Introduction

Solar sporadic outbreaks of radiation (flares) have been known since the middle of the 19th century (Carrington Reference Carrington1859). Solar sporadic outbreaks of highly energetic particles (CMEs) have been known since the 1970s (Tousey Reference Tousey, Rycroft and Runcorn1973, Gosling et al. Reference Gosling, Hildner, MacQueen, Munro, Poland and Ross1974). Powerful solar flare and CME events are correlated on a temporal and spatial scale (see Fig. 1); weaker events often show no correlation.

Fig. 1. Shown is a solar example of the correlation of mass ejections and flares. During the last solar maximum a set of powerful flare/CME events occurred, one of which is shown. The left panel shows a Large Angle and Spectrometric COronograph (LASCO) image of the 4 November 2003 Halo CME. Overlaid is an Extreme UV Imaging Telescope (EIT) image showing the corresponding X-class flare occurring on the eastern solar limb. The right panel shows a GOES X-ray lightcurve showing the rapid increase of solar X-ray flux.

Stellar flares have been known since the 1940s on ultraviolet (UV) Ceti type stars. In the middle of the 1970s, flares were also detected in X-rays and today we know, due to sensitive instruments, that every star which has a corona is also variable in X-rays. This stellar phenomenon can be easily detected in lightcurves.

Stellar CMEs are indirect and therefore more difficultly to detect. Indications of stellar mass ejections were detected several times on young and active dM stars as line asymmetries in Balmer lines. Houdebine et al. (Reference Houdebine, Foing and Rodono1990) analysed a set of optical spectra of the young (0.2 Gyr) and active M 3.5 Ve star AD Leonis. The authors detected a distinct blue wing enhancement of the H-gamma (434.1 nm) Balmer line, decreasing with time until it vanished completely. They deduced a Doppler velocity of 5800 km s−1, which is about twice the value of the fastest solar CMEs obtained by the 3.6 m telescope at the European Southern Observatory (ESO). Further, UV dimmings known from the sun to be correlated with CMEs were detected on the active M dwarf EV Lacertae during several hours of International Ultraviolet Explorer (IUE) observations (Ambruster et al. Reference Ambruster, Pettersen, Hawley, Coleman and Sandmann1986). A drop in the UV flux lasting for 1.5 hours of the star was interpreted as a mass ejection event. Extreme Ultraviolet Explorer (EUVE) observations of the young dM star AU Microscopii revealed a powerful flare with a decay time of a day. Cully et al. (Reference Cully, Fisher, Abbott and Siegmund1994) reconstructed the strongest spectral lines successfully by including the assumption of an ejected magnetically confined plasma in their model. The deduced mass and kinetic energy of this event was a factor 10 000 higher than the strongest solar CME events. Fuhrmeister & Schmitt (Reference Fuhrmeister and Schmitt2004) detected a huge flare on the old dM9 star DENIS104814.7-395606.1. They further found a blue wing asymmetry in the Balmer H-alpha and H-beta lines, which they favour to be a signature of plasma that has been ejected into the observer's direction.

The relevance for such investigations is not only the interest in applications for stellar mass and/or momentum loss, but also for non-thermal planetary mass loss. It has been shown (Grießmeier et al. Reference Grießmeier, Stadelmann, Motschmann, Belisheva, Lammer and Biernat2005; Khodachenko et al. Reference Khodachenko2007; Lammer et al. Reference Lammer2007) that the combination of a close orbit, frequent CME impacts and a weak planetary magnetic field, acting as a protector against high energy particles, can lead to the total erosion of a planetary atmosphere. On active and young stars, the radiation environment is certainly higher than on older stars. Higher temperatures lead to the expansion of upper planetary atmospheric layers, on the other hand a fast and dense stellar wind pushes the Magnetopause closer to the planet, resulting in a volume of expanded atmosphere, which is then unprotected against high energetic particles, and can then be easily eroded. Information on the frequency, mass, velocity, and the kinetic energy of stellar mass ejections is crucial for models that simulate the influence of high-energy particles on planetary atmospheres. Since the parameters (velocity, energy, mass) of stellar mass ejections of active stars are expected to be larger (c.f. Houdebine et al. Reference Houdebine, Foing and Rodono1990) than solar values, the influence on atmospheres of orbiting planets will be more efficient.

Observations

We use data from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)/Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer (FUSE) satellite, which monitored the active and young dM star AD Leonis for more than 18 hours, resulting in 41 spectra and lightcurves. The FUSE covers the FUV wavelength region from 90.5 to 118.7 nm, including strong stellar transition region lines (CIII (99.7 nm) singlet, CIII (117.6 nm) multiplet, and OVI (103.2 nm, 103.8 nm) duplet). The observations were performed using the LWRS aperture. The raw data files were calibrated with FUSE's calibration pipeline CalFuse v3.2. A re-calibration of the data allows data screening, accessible only in the Intermediate Data Files (IDFs), which are generated through the calibration process from which the calibrated spectra emerge. The data are corrected for Inter Stellar Material (ISM) absorption affecting the mainly the CIII (99.7 nm) singlet (cf. Guinan et al. Reference Guinan, Ribas and Harper2003) and the spectra are re-wavelength calibrated using ISM absorption lines (CIII) and Hubble Space Telescope (HST) spectra overlapping in the long wavelength region of the FUSE. The data are screened for night-time events only and the lightcurves are extracted using wavelength windows centred on the above-mentioned strong transition region lines to avoid geocoronal emission.

Results

AD Leonis showed, during 18 hours of observations, two distinct flares in the lightcurves (see Christian et al. Reference Christian, Mathioudakis, Bloomfield, Dupuis, Keenan, Pollacco and Malina2006, who analysed the data in view of opacity effects) with energies of 0.16 and 0.25×1032 erg. The flares appear distinct in the CIII (117.6 nm) multiplet, but less distinct in the OVI (103.2 nm) duplet and CIII (97.7 nm) singlet. The analysis of the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the whole spectral time series of the OVI duplet showed a maximum at spectrum no. 38, which is one spectrum after the flare in spectrum no. 37. Both spectra are characterized by broad asymmetric wings. Flare spectrum no. 37 shows a red wing asymmetry, and spectrum no. 38 shows a broader blue wing asymmetry (indicated by an arrow in Fig. 2) shifted by about 90 km s−1 from the line centre of the OVI. The FUSE offers, due to its wavelength coverage, the possibility of investigating the electron density sensitive line ratio CIII (117.6 nm)/CIII (97.7 nm). This ratio was found to be increased in solar active regions (Dupree et al. Reference Dupree, Foukal and Jordan1976). During the flares of AD Leonis, the ratio was also increased (see Fig. 3). CMEs cause regions of increased electron density (c.f. Kathiravan & Ramesh Reference Kathiravan and Ramesh2005), which is assumed to reflect in the density sensitive line ratio. However, a correlation of CMEs and the increase of the carbon ion line ratio has not been proven so far.

Fig. 2. Plotted is spectrum no. 37 and no. 38 of the FUSE/AD Leonis time series. One can clearly see the blue wing (indicated by an arrow) enhancement in the OVI (103.2 nm) transition region line in the right panel. The deduced Doppler velocity is 90 km s−1. The line profile could be fitted with a multi Gaussian function, reproducing the enhancement.

Fig. 3. Shown is the variation of the carbon ion line ratio in time for the AD Leonis NASA/FUSE data. The flares in the data (no. 37 and no. 52) are marked by big asterisks. The shaded area represents the mean line ratio of the whole data set together with the measurement uncertainty. As one can see, both flares show the highest values (c.f. Christian et al. Reference Christian, Mathioudakis, Bloomfield, Dupuis, Keenan, Pollacco and Malina2006).

Discussion

Since mass ejections on stars are only indirectly detectable, and accessible only via signatures, which are mostly known from the sun, possible phenomena that could cause those signatures have to be discussed. The deduced velocity of the spectral event shown in Fig. 3 is about 90 km s−1, not high compared to average solar CMEs, which makes it more difficult to interpret the spectral feature correctly, since quiescent solar plasma motions were detected in the range of 5–100 km s−1. Even solar chromospheric evaporation was found to be in the range of 100 km s−1 (Teriaca et al. Reference Teriaca, Banerjee and Doyle1999). The spectral feature occurred one spectrum after a flare spectrum corresponding to a difference in time of about two hours. Although lightcurve no. 38 shows no variation, the mean countrate is clearly above the quiescent value, therefore the phenomenon producing the spectral feature (see Fig. 2) could be related to the flare in lightcurve no. 37, but this remains unclear, due to the large difference in time. Another possible explanation for the spectral feature is a plasma cloud co-rotating with the star (see Fuhrmeister & Schmitt Reference Fuhrmeister and Schmitt2004). If this is the case, then the height of the cloud must not exceed the Keplerian co-rotation radius. With the deduced velocity of the spectral feature and the rotation period of AD Leonis, we can measure the height of the cloud. The comparison of the cloud height and the Keplerian co-rotation radius shows that the deduced velocity is too large for a stable plasma cloud. The velocity that one deduces is a projected velocity, since we do not know the angle of propagation. Therefore, in addition, small velocities can be attributed to mass ejection events. Let us assume a plasma (CME) propagation with a pitch angle of 269° (a pitch angle of 270° corresponds to an orthogonal propagation from the eastern stellar limb) and a normal velocity component of 90 km s−1, then the resulting or real velocity corresponds to 5156 km s−1. This estimation gives an upper limit to the real velocity of the possible mass ejection event.

Acknowledgements

M.L., P.O. and A.H. gratefully acknowledge the Austrian Fonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung (FWF grant P19446) for supporting this project. This research has made use of the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France.

References

Ambruster, C.W., Pettersen, B.R., Hawley, S., Coleman, L.A. & Sandmann, W.H. (1986). In ESA Proc. of an International Symposium on New Insights in Astrophysics. Eight Years of UV Astronomy with IUE, 263, pp. 137140.Google Scholar
Carrington, R.C. (1859). Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 20, 1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christian, D.J., Mathioudakis, M., Bloomfield, D.S., Dupuis, J., Keenan, F.P., Pollacco, D.L. & Malina, R.F. (2006). Astron. Astrophys. 454, 889894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cully, S.L., Fisher, G.H., Abbott, M.J. & Siegmund, O.H.W. (1994). Astrophys. J. 435, 435449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupree, A.K., Foukal, P.V. & Jordan, C. (1976). Astrophys. J. 209, 621623, 625632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrmeister, B. & Schmitt, J.H.M.M. (2004). Astron. Astrophys. 420, 10791085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosling, J.T., Hildner, E., MacQueen, R.M., Munro, R.H., Poland, A.I. & Ross, C.L. (1974). J. Geophys. Res. 79, 45814587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grießmeier, J.-M., Stadelmann, A., Motschmann, U., Belisheva, N.K., Lammer, H. & Biernat, H.K. (2005). Astrobiology 5, 587, 603.Google Scholar
Guinan, E.F., Ribas, I. & Harper, G. (2003). Astrophys. J. 594, 561572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houdebine, E.R., Foing, B.H. & Rodono, M. (1990). Astron. Astrophys. 238, 249255.Google Scholar
Kathiravan, C. & Ramesh, R. (2005). Astrophys. J. Lett. 627, L77L80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khodachenko, M.L. et al. (2007). Planet. Space Sci. 55, 631642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lammer, H. et al. (2007). Astrobiology 7, 185207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teriaca, L., Banerjee, D. & Doyle, J.G. (1999). Astron. Astrophys. 349, 636648.Google Scholar
Tousey, R. (1973). The Solar Corona, In Cospar Space Research XIII, ed. Rycroft, M.J. & Runcorn, S.K., pp. 713730. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Shown is a solar example of the correlation of mass ejections and flares. During the last solar maximum a set of powerful flare/CME events occurred, one of which is shown. The left panel shows a Large Angle and Spectrometric COronograph (LASCO) image of the 4 November 2003 Halo CME. Overlaid is an Extreme UV Imaging Telescope (EIT) image showing the corresponding X-class flare occurring on the eastern solar limb. The right panel shows a GOES X-ray lightcurve showing the rapid increase of solar X-ray flux.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Plotted is spectrum no. 37 and no. 38 of the FUSE/AD Leonis time series. One can clearly see the blue wing (indicated by an arrow) enhancement in the OVI (103.2 nm) transition region line in the right panel. The deduced Doppler velocity is 90 km s−1. The line profile could be fitted with a multi Gaussian function, reproducing the enhancement.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Shown is the variation of the carbon ion line ratio in time for the AD Leonis NASA/FUSE data. The flares in the data (no. 37 and no. 52) are marked by big asterisks. The shaded area represents the mean line ratio of the whole data set together with the measurement uncertainty. As one can see, both flares show the highest values (c.f. Christian et al.2006).