Introduced in 1838, the poor law provided the primary source of poor relief in Ireland until the early 1920s, and in Northern Ireland until 1948. The institution of the workhouse was central to the poor law system, and remains largely synonymous with it despite the fact that by the later decades of the nineteenth century the majority of people receiving poor relief on any particular day were receiving outdoor rather than indoor relief. Popular perceptions of the workhouse, as Colman O Mahony notes, are overwhelmingly negative, the long-lasting association with ‘humiliation, forced labour, poor conditions and other forms of degradation’, being reinforced in the Irish context by images of sickness, starvation and death drawn from the period of the Great Famine (1845–52). O Mahony sets out to ‘disentangle the truth from the fiction and present a realistic and factual account of workhouse life’ (p. x). Based primarily on newspaper reports of the proceedings of the board of guardians together with information gleaned from local records and official papers, the study provides a fascinating picture of the operation and management of the Cork workhouse in the period from its establishment in 1840 until the temporary dissolution of the board of guardians in 1890. Chapters are organized thematically, some focusing on different aspects of workhouse administration such as diet, health, work and schooling, while others explore issues affecting workhouse management such as the impact of the laws of settlement that allowed Irish migrants to be removed from English unions in which they had sought relief and returned to Ireland. One of the themes running throughout the work is the tension between those guardians whose primary concern was protecting the pockets of the ratepayers and those who were more interested in providing for the poor and vulnerable. Thus the efforts of a small number of guardians to improve the quality and range of educational provision within the workhouse were regularly blocked by colleagues who regarded an academic education as wasted on children who would be lucky to find labouring work. O Mahony also examines the role of ideology, showing how religious and political divisions often led to administrative paralysis as guardians devoted far more time and energy to attacking their opponents than to expediting the business of the board. The continued disruption of board meetings by political arguments was to cause the board of guardians to be dissolved by the Irish Local Government Board in 1890 and salaried vice guardians appointed to manage the union. Dissolution was one feature of the Irish poor law which represented a departure from the English model, a point that is rather lost in this account. The author makes frequent reference to English poor law historiography, implying that this is directly relevant to Ireland whereas in fact the different legislative and administrative context in Ireland makes direct comparison problematic on many levels.

Demonstrating what can be achieved with the available sources despite their inevitable institutional bias, O Mahony focuses wherever possible on the experiences of workhouse inmates and, through an accumulation of telling details, he succeeds in bringing the workhouse to life and creating a vivid picture of staff and inmates. He is particularly good on conditions within the workhouse, whether in regard to the poor quality of workhouse food or to the bleak and inhospitable nature of the physical environment. What is often lost in the mass of detail, however, is any sense of wider developments within the poor law system. O Mahony notes the introduction and subsequent expansion of outdoor relief, for example, but fails to explore the impact of this development on the composition of the workhouse population or the character of local relief system. By the early 1870s, 27 per cent of the recipients of poor relief in Cork were receiving outdoor relief, a significantly higher proportion than in other major urban unions in Ireland. Reading this study leaves us no wiser as to why this was the case. Indeed, throughout the study, Cork is examined in isolation with little attempt being made to compare poor law practices there with those in other Irish poor law unions. Given the undeveloped state of Irish poor law history, the scope for such comparisons is necessarily limited but it is a pity that more use was not made of those local studies that do exist. The focus of this work is very much on institutional and administrative developments. Few statistics are included and no attempt is made to analyse relief figures or to identify the age, gender or occupational profile of the workhouse population, a particularly regrettable omission since Cork is one of relatively few poor law unions in the south of the country for which indoor registers have survived. There are of course limits to what a single study can realistically undertake, and within its own self-imposed constraints this is a valuable addition to poor law historiography providing, as the author intended, an admirably ‘balanced account of the business and motives of the Cork board of guardians, as they related to the interests of the poor and workhouse inmates’ (p. xiii).