Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T09:47:32.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hygienic and health characteristics of donkey milk during a follow-up study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2010

Rachel Pilla
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Pathology, Hygiene and Public Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 10, 20133Milano, Italy
Valentina Daprà
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Pathology, Hygiene and Public Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 10, 20133Milano, Italy
Alfonso Zecconi
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Pathology, Hygiene and Public Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 10, 20133Milano, Italy
Renata Piccinini*
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Pathology, Hygiene and Public Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 10, 20133Milano, Italy
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: renata.piccinini@unimi.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For its characteristics, donkey milk has been proposed as an alternative to goat or artificial milk to feed allergic infants. Therefore, it is important to increase our knowledge on health and immunological characteristics of donkey milk. Ten donkeys, bred as companion animals, were enrolled in this study and sampled once a month, for eight months. Milk (10 ml) was collected from each half udder for somatic cell count (SCC), bacteriological analysis and total bacteria count (TBC). The major pathogens were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility, and Staphylococcus aureus isolates were further genotyped by nanoarray analysis. Whey lysozyme and NAGase (NAG) activities were also assessed. Overall, 101 half-udder milk samples were taken. They showed very low values of TBC (<250 cfu/ml) and SCC (<50 000 cells/ml) and a minor prevalence of pathogens: Staph. aureus was isolated only from 5 milk samples (3 animals), Streptococcus equi from 2 samples and Str. equisimilis from a single sample. All the isolates were sensitive to all antibiotic classes used in veterinary medicine. None of the Staph. aureus isolates were shown to harbour genes coding for any enterotoxin, toxic-shock syndrome toxin or antibiotic resistance. Lysozyme levels were always very high (4000–5000 U/ml), while NAG values were mostly low (<50 U/ml), out of the last part of lactation. The results of this study confirmed the low prevalence of intramammary infections in donkey and the absence of food-borne pathogens, suggesting that donkey milk could be a safe food, if the mammary gland is healthy and the animals are milked in proper hygienic conditions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2010

In recent years donkey milk has been widely studied because its composition has been shown to be very similar to that of human milk. Donkey milk is characterized by low β-lactoglobulin, casein and fat content; also, the lipid fraction appears characterized by high levels of both linoleic and linolenic acids (Salimei et al. Reference Salimei, Fantuz, Coppola, Chiofalo, Polidori and Varisco2004; Vincenzetti et al. Reference Vincenzetti, Polidori, Mariani, Cammertoni, Fantuz and Vita2008). Lysozyme content has been reported to be very high (3750 mg/l) in comparison with cow milk (0·09 mg/l) and human milk (40–200 mg/l) (Chiavari et al. Reference Chiavari, Coloretti, Nanni, Sorrentino and Grazia2005; Vincenzetti et al. Reference Vincenzetti, Polidori, Mariani, Cammertoni, Fantuz and Vita2008). Such a high amount of lysozyme in donkey milk has positive effects on the conservation of raw milk and milk products (Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Zhao, Jiang, Dong and Ren2008). Moreover, Chiavari et al. (Reference Chiavari, Coloretti, Nanni, Sorrentino and Grazia2005) demonstrated, in a fermented beverage with lactobacilli, a lysozyme activity virtually unchanged in comparison with initial values, even after a 30-d shelf life. For its characteristics, ass milk has been proposed as an alternative to goat milk or artificial milk in infants allergic to cow milk (Iacono et al. Reference Iacono, Carroccio, Cavataio, Montalto, Soresi and Balsamo1992; Vita et al. Reference Vita, Passalacqua, Di Pasquale, Caminiti, Crisafulli, Rulli and Pajno2007). A recent study considering multi-allergic children, showed a significant increase in length/stature and weight in the majority of the subjects treated with donkey milk, in comparison with untreated subjects (Monti et al. Reference Monti, Bertino, Cristina, Coscia, Cresi, Silvestro, Fabris, Fortunato, Gabriella and Conti2008). Furthermore, the immunological properties of donkey milk have been recently investigated, showing that humans consuming ass milk have an increased blood mononuclear cells nitric oxide release, which could be useful in the prevention of atherosclerosis (Tafaro et al. Reference Tafaro, Magrone, Jirillo, Martemucci, D'Alessandro, Amati and Jirillo2007).

On the other hand, the importance of innate defences, including lysozyme and N-acetyl-ß-D-glucosaminidase (NAGase), in the mammary health of dairy cows is well known (Piccinini et al. Reference Piccinini, Binda, Belotti, Casirani and Zecconi2005, Reference Piccinini, Binda, Belotti, Daprà and Zecconi2007). Nevertheless, the role of such enzymes in the health of donkey mammary gland has been poorly investigated. NAGase is a lysosomal enzyme secreted in large amounts in the mammary gland during inflammation, implicated as an indicator of tissue damage during mastitis. Lysozyme displays antibacterial activity against a number of bacteria and it is present in high amounts in human and ass milk, in contrast to cow milk. Such high concentrations could represent a mechanism of protection against infections and also contribute to the elimination of new infections (Salimei et al. Reference Salimei, Fantuz, Coppola, Chiofalo, Polidori and Varisco2004; Vincenzetti, Reference Vincenzetti, Polidori, Mariani, Cammertoni, Fantuz and Vita2008). Indeed, mastitis in asses is very rare, and usually follows traumatic injures to teats, or drying off (Conte et al. Reference Conte, Piccinini, Daprà and Gagliano2006).

The aim of this study was to assess mammary gland health status and milk hygiene of companion donkeys during an entire lactation, in order to try to define some physiological ranges. These could become useful to test the healthiness and safety of ass milk in infant feeding.

Animals from different provinces of Lombardy region, Italy, were repeatedly sampled and half-udder milk was examined by total bacteria count (TBC), bacteriological analysis and somatic cell count (SCC), determination of lysozyme and NAGase content. Finally, the pathogenic potential of Staphylococcus aureus isolates was investigated at a molecular level.

Materials and Methods

Study population and sampling procedure

Ten animals from Novara, Pavia, Bergamo, Milano and Como provinces (Amiata breed) were included in this study. The median age of the donkeys was 6.7 years and all the animals were from hobby farms.

The donkeys were sampled once a month, for eight months. The foal was taken away from the mother 2–3 h before sampling, then 10 ml milk was collected aseptically from each half udder, in accordance with NMC guidelines (1999). All samples were kept at 4°C until bacteriological analysis of milk was performed.

Milk cytological and bacteriological analysis

Ten μl of each milk sample was plated onto blood agar plate (5% sheep blood; Oxoid, Cambridge, UK) and processed according to NMC guidelines (1999). Colonies of growth were isolated, identified following NMC guidelines and confirmed by API system. The major pathogens were further tested for antimicrobial susceptibility by agar disk diffusion method (Bauer et al. Reference Bauer, Kirby, Sherris and Turk1966) and subsequently, the isolates were frozen in Brain Heart Infusion Broth (Oxoid, Cambridge, UK) with 15% glycerol (v/v) until further molecular analyses were performed.

TBC was performed on plate count agar, using the inclusion method. One ml of undiluted samples and of each 10−1 and 10−2 dilution were included in the agar and the plates were incubated for 48 h before counting. The results were then multiplied by the dilution factor, and expressed as cfu/ml.

A 3-ml aliquot of each milk sample was centrifuged at 16 000 g for 20 min, and the whey was frozen at −80°C for enzyme determination.

The samples were further tested for SCC by a Bentley Somacount 150 (Bentley Instruments, Chaska MN, USA).

Molecular analysis

DNA extraction

Molecular characterization of bacteria was performed only on Staph. aureus isolates, owing to their central role as causative agents of foodborne diseases. From each isolate, one colony was cultured in Nutrient Broth (Oxoid) at 37°C overnight. The broth was then centrifuged at 5000 g for 5 min and the DNA was extracted using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison WI, USA). Lysostaphin (5 mg/ml; Sigma) was used for bacterial lysis. DNA amount and purity were tested with a ND-100 Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies Inc., Wilmington DE, USA). DNA integrity was checked by electrophoresis on 0·8% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide (0·5 μg/ml) in TAE buffer.

Nanoarray analysis

DNA microarray (CLONDIAG chip technology, Jena, Germany) was used to genotype Staph. aureus isolates. A set of probes covering different toxins (enterotoxins, leukotoxins, haemolysins), the allelic variants of the Agr gene and antibiotic resistance determinants to β-lactams, methicillin, macrolides, aminoglycosides, vancomycin, lincosamides and tetracyclines were included in the chip. The arrays were processed as described elsewhere (Monecke et al. Reference Monecke, Levbe and Enright2003; Monecke & Ehricht, Reference Monecke and Enright2005). Briefly, genomic DNA was amplified, labelled with biotin-16-dUTP (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and hybridized into the array. The products were visualized using streptavidin-horseradish-peroxidase and a chromogenic substrate (Seramun, Wolzig, Germany). The reaction was read on an array tube reader ATR01 with the Iconoclust software package (CLONDIAG chip technologies, Jena, Germany).

Enzyme determinations

Enzyme determinations were performed in a single session for each enzyme, at the end of the follow-up period.

Lysozyme activity was assessed by a commercial fluorimetric method (EnzChek Lysozyme Kit, Invitrogen, Carlsbad CA, USA) on microplate. The method is based on the lysis of Micrococcus lysodeycticus labelled with fluorescine to such a degree that fluorescence is quenched. Lysozyme activity was measured on a fluorimeter at 494 nm exc and 518 nm em (Ascent, Thermo Labsystem FL, USA) and expressed as Units (amount of lysozyme producing a decrease in turbidity of 0·0001 OD units per min, using 0·3 mg/ml). For each plate, a standard curve was prepared within a range, 8–500 U/ml.

NAGase activity was assessed by the procedure described by Kitchen et al. (1978) and expressed as Units (pmol of 4-methylumbelliferon released per min at 25°C catalysed by 10 μl milk) on a microplate fluorimeter at 355 nm exc and 460 nm em (Ascent, Thermo Labsystem).

Statistical analysis

Data were recorded in a database. To assess the pattern of the different milk components during follow-up period and the differences between bacteriologically positive and negative samples, data were analysed using the GLM procedure of SAS 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary NC, USA). The GLM model included age, days in milk and bacteriological status as predictive variables.

Results

Milk hygienic parameters and mammary gland health status

Cytologic and bacteriologic analysis

Overall, 101 half-udder samples were taken. SCC and TBC during the follow-up period are reported in Table 1. All milk samples showed very low values of TBC, ranging from 10 to 250 cfu/ml. Overall SCC values were below 50 000 cells/ml, independently of bacteriological results; the only 5 samples showing high values (>600 000 cells/ml) were from 3 donkeys close to the dry period. Accordingly, 88·8% of all samples were bacteriologically negative and 60% of such samples were sterile. Staph. aureus was isolated from 5 samples taken from 3 different animals. Other donkey major pathogens, i.e. Streptococcus equi and Str. equisimilis, represented 2% (2 samples) and 1% (1 sample) respectively of the isolates. As reported in Table 2, most infections were evidenced in the central period of lactation, i.e. 2–6 months after parturition. All the isolates were further tested by the agar disk diffusion method and not one of them exhibited resistance to any of the antibiotics tested. Indeed, 100% of bacteria were sensitive to all antibiotic classes used in veterinary medicine.

Table 1. Somatic cell count (SCC) and total bacteria count (TBC) of donkey milk during the follow-up period, in relation to days in milk

Values within a row without a common superscript are significantly different at α=0·05

Table 2. Results of bacteriological analysis of ass milk samples during the follow-up study

Molecular analysis

In accordance with the phenotypic sensitivity demonstrated by all the isolates, the nanoarray characterization of Staph. aureus isolates showed that not one of them harboured any of the genes encoding resistance to either β-lactams, or methicillin, aminoglycosides, macrolides, vancomycin, lincosamides or tetracyclines.

Moreover, neither enterotoxin genes nor toxic-shock syndrome toxin (TSST) gene were ever detected. Among the leukocidins and bicomponent toxins, all Staph. aureus isolates harboured the leukocidin D (LukD) gene, but not the E component of LukD/E, and the genes coding for α-, γ- and δ-haemolysin. Furthermore, two strains from two donkeys displayed the β-haemolysin gene, while the other three isolates from the third animal lacked such gene, as shown in Table 3.

Table 3. Results of nanoarray analysis of Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected during the follow-up period

Immune parameters

Enzyme determination

Lysozyme levels were always very high, since most samples showed values around 4000–5000 U/ml, independently of the presence or absence of bacteria. The activity of this enzyme evidenced higher values in the first 60 d post parturition, then lysozyme content showed a slight decrease until 180 days in milk (DIM). In the following two months a significant decrease was observed, while in the last part of lactation lysozyme content increased to the levels observed in the period 61–180 DIM (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Lysozyme activity versus days in lactation, during the follow-up period. Values with different letters (a,b) are significantly different at α=0·05.

On the contrary, NAG values were mostly low, usually below 50 U/ml for the whole lactation, but evidenced a significant increase close to 80 U/ml after 8 months of lactation (Fig. 2) independently of bacteriological status, as reported in Table 4.

Fig. 2. NAGase activity versus days in lactation, during the follow-up period. Values with different letters (a,b) are significantly different at α=0·05.

Table 4. Hygienic and health parameters of donkey milk from culture-negative and culture-positive samples, during the follow-up period

Values within a column with different superscript are significantly different at α=0·05

Discussion

The increased interest in feeding allergic infants with donkey milk is raising the importance of increasing our knowledge on health and immunological aspects of donkey milk. To address this topic, 10 donkeys were enrolled in the present study, as a model to explore physiological ranges for ass mammary gland immunity and health status. Indeed, these donkeys were bred as companion animals, thus they were not exposed to the stresses affecting animals in commercial herds, such as milking procedures. The findings can be useful to investigate the potential benefits of donkey milk in infant feeding, or else the risks to human health.

SCC and TBC values were always extremely low, in accordance with Beghelli et al. (Reference Beghelli, Roscini, Valiani, Vincenzetti, Cavallucci and Polidori2009) who registered SCC values between 14 736 and 46 095 cells/ml during an entire lactation. Nevertheless significant differences could be observed between culture-negative and culture-positive half glands, since the infected glands showed both increased cell and bacterial counts. On the other hand, TBC values never exceeded 90 cfu/ml, even in infected half-glands, proving that high bulk milk TBC values are related to poor milking procedures.

Another interesting outcome concerned the molecular characterization of Staph. aureus strains. Nanoarray genetic analysis showed similar results overall, although the animals sampled were absolutely not related. The only difference observed, concerned the β-haemolysin gene. Indeed, 2 of the 5 isolates harboured all the haemolysin genes (α-, β-, γ- and δ-haemolysin) while the remaining 3 isolates from the same donkey lacked the β-haemolysin gene. In contrast to studies on cow isolates (Zecconi et al. Reference Zecconi, Cesaris, Liandris, Daprà and Piccinini2006; Fournier et al. Reference Fournier, Kuhnert, Frey, Miserez, Kirchhofer, Kaufmann, Steiner and Graber2008) none of the Staph. aureus strains harboured genes coding for any enterotoxin or TSST. Besides, all the isolates lacked any gene encoding antibiotic resistance. Therefore, the results of the present study suggest that these isolates had a low pathogenicity, and also represent a low risk to the potential consumer.

When immunological characteristics were considered, lysozyme activity in half-udder milk samples was always very high, when compared with cow milk. These results are in accordance with previous studies (Conte et al. Reference Conte, Mazzullo, Lo Verde, Monsù, Scatassa and Macrì2003; Salimei et al. Reference Salimei, Fantuz, Coppola, Chiofalo, Polidori and Varisco2004; Conte et al. Reference Conte, Piccinini, Daprà and Gagliano2006; Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Zhao, Jiang, Dong and Ren2008; Polidori et al. Reference Polidori, Beghelli, Mariani and Vincenzetti2009) reporting levels as high as 4 mg/ml in donkey bulk milk, or 7000 U/ml in the milk of single animals. Interestingly, lysozyme activity was independent of udder bacteriological status. Indeed, the milk samples of the half-udders infected with major pathogens (Staph. aureus, Str. equi, Str. equisimilis) showed lysozyme values similar to those of the healthy ones. Furthermore, nearly all the donkeys showed transient infections that self-cured within the 4-week interval between samplings. Indeed, only the oldest animal, a 12-year-old ass, was infected throughout lactation.

On the other hand, NAG values were always moderately low, in negative as well as in bacteriologically positive milk samples, with no differences throughout lactation, except for the last part of it. Such data suggest a major role for lysozyme in the defence of donkey mammary gland.

The results of this follow-up study suggest that donkey milk could be a safe food for allergic infants and elderly people, if the mammary gland is healthy and the animals are milked properly, following hygienic procedures as recommended by Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 for cows and small ruminants (Conte & Passantino, Reference Conte and Passantino2009). Indeed, it should be emphasized that this paper considered only donkeys held in hobby farms. Such results may not be applicable to commercial donkey farms. Indeed, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp have been recently isolated from donkey milk in Sicily (Naccari et al. Reference Naccari, Foti, Giacopello, Mariavitale, Passantino, Russo and Conte2009) suggesting the presence of health risks, when the donkey herd is not characterized by high-level of management and hygiene. Besides, it should be advised to milk the donkey for not longer than 6 months, since thereafter a significant fall in lysozyme and an increase in NAG content were detected. The values observed in the last part of lactation appeared to be not physiological in the ass, supporting previous observations (Salimei et al. Reference Salimei, Fantuz, Coppola, Chiofalo, Polidori and Varisco2004) of a significant reduction of protein content throughout lactation.

Conclusion

The anatomical structure of donkey mammary gland together with some parameters related to udder innate immunity, appeared to be able to keep it healthy, as confirmed by the low prevalence of intramammary infections in donkey. Indeed, when hygienic milking procedures were applied, donkey milk showed very low TBC and almost absence of pathogens. Above all, food-borne pathogens such as the enterotoxin-producer Staph. aureus, were never detected. Even though the results of this study are very encouraging, further studies in donkey herds are required, to investigate health status of mammary gland and safety of donkey milk in intensive farming conditions, in order to satisfy the consumer's demand.

References

Bauer, AW, Kirby, WMM, Sherris, JC & Turk, M 1966 Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 45 493496Google Scholar
Beghelli, D, Roscini, A, Valiani, A, Vincenzetti, S, Cavallucci, C & Polidori, P 2009 Somatic (CSS) and differential cell count (DCC) during a lactation period in ass milk. Italian Journal of Animal Science 8 691693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiavari, C, Coloretti, F, Nanni, M, Sorrentino, E & Grazia, L 2005 Use of donkey's milk for a fermented beverage with lactobacilli. Lait 85 481490Google Scholar
Conte, F, Mazzullo, G, Lo Verde, V, Monsù, G, Scatassa, ML & Macrì, D 2003 [Mastitis in the ass: description of three cases in Sicily. Qualitative evaluations on the milk, cytology and sanitary consideration] Large Animal Review 5 6368Google Scholar
Conte, F, Piccinini, R, Daprà, V & Gagliano, V 2006. [Evaluation of lysozyme in asses' milk] 60th National Conference S. I. S.Vet. (Terrasini (PA) 27–30/09/2006)Google Scholar
Conte, F & Passantino, A 2009 Guidelines for physical, chemical and hygienic quality and safety control of donkey's milk. Milchwissenschaft 64 8588Google Scholar
Fournier, C, Kuhnert, P, Frey, J, Miserez, R, Kirchhofer, M, Kaufmann, T, Steiner, A & Graber, HU 2008 Bovine Staphylococcus aureus: association of virulence genes, genotypes and clinical outcome. Research in Veterinary Science 85 439448CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iacono, G, Carroccio, A, Cavataio, F, Montalto, G, Soresi, M & Balsamo, V 1992 Use of ass milk in multiple food allergy. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 14 177181Google ScholarPubMed
Monecke, S, Levbe, I & Enright, R 2003 Simple and robust array-based methods for the parallel detection of resistance genes of Staphylococcus aureus. Genome Letters 2 106118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monecke, S & Enright, R 2005 Rapid genotyping of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates using miniaturized oligonucleotide arrays. Clinical Microbiology of Infection 11 825833Google Scholar
Monti, G, Bertino, E, Cristina, MM, Coscia, A, Cresi, F, Silvestro, L, Fabris, C, Fortunato, D, Gabriella, MG & Conti, A 2008 Efficacy of donkey's milk in treating highly problematic cow's milk allergic children: an in vivo and in vitro study. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology 19 8588Google Scholar
Naccari, F, Foti, M, Giacopello, C, Mariavitale, P, Passantino, A, Russo, C & Conte, F 2009 Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus sp isolated from donkey's milk in Sicily: preliminary study. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 32 150Google Scholar
NMC 1999 Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis. Madison WI, USA: National Mastitis Council IncGoogle Scholar
Piccinini, R, Binda, E, Belotti, M, Casirani, G & Zecconi, A 2005 Comparison of blood and milk non-specific immune parameters in heifers after calving in relation to udder health. Veterinary Research 36 747757Google Scholar
Piccinini, R, Binda, E, Belotti, M, Daprà, V & Zecconi, A 2007 Evaluation of milk components during whole lactation in healthy quarters. Journal of Dairy Research 74 226232CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polidori, P, Beghelli, D, Mariani, P, Vincenzetti, S 2009 Donkey milk production: state of the art. Italian Journal of Animal Science 8 677683Google Scholar
Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 Guidance document on the implementation of certain provisions on the hygiene of food of animal origin. European Commission, Health & Consumer Protection Directorate General (Brussels, 21 December 2005)Google Scholar
Salimei, E, Fantuz, F, Coppola, R, Chiofalo, B, Polidori, P & Varisco, G 2004 Composition and characteristics of ass's milk. Animal Research 53 6778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tafaro, A, Magrone, T, Jirillo, F, Martemucci, G, D'Alessandro, AG, Amati, L & Jirillo, E 2007 Immunological properties of donkey's milk: Its potential use in the prevention of atherosclerosis. Current Pharmaceutical Design 13 37113717Google Scholar
Vincenzetti, S, Polidori, P, Mariani, P, Cammertoni, N, Fantuz, F & Vita, A 2008 Donkey's milk protein fractions characterization. Food Chemistry 106 640649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vita, D, Passalacqua, G, Di Pasquale, G, Caminiti, L, Crisafulli, G, Rulli, I & Pajno, GB 2007 Ass's milk in children with atopic dermatitis and cow's milk allergy: Crossover comparison with goat's milk. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology 18 594598Google Scholar
Zecconi, A, Cesaris, L, Liandris, E, Daprà, V & Piccinini, R 2006 Role of several Staphylococcus aureus virulence factors on the inflammatory response in bovine mammary gland. Microbial Pathogens 40 177183Google Scholar
Zhang, XY, Zhao, L, Jiang, L, Dong, ML & Ren, FZ 2008 The antimicrobial activity of donkey milk and its microflora changes during storage. Food Control 19 11911195Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Somatic cell count (SCC) and total bacteria count (TBC) of donkey milk during the follow-up period, in relation to days in milk

Figure 1

Table 2. Results of bacteriological analysis of ass milk samples during the follow-up study

Figure 2

Table 3. Results of nanoarray analysis of Staphylococcus aureus isolates collected during the follow-up period

Figure 3

Fig. 1. Lysozyme activity versus days in lactation, during the follow-up period. Values with different letters (a,b) are significantly different at α=0·05.

Figure 4

Fig. 2. NAGase activity versus days in lactation, during the follow-up period. Values with different letters (a,b) are significantly different at α=0·05.

Figure 5

Table 4. Hygienic and health parameters of donkey milk from culture-negative and culture-positive samples, during the follow-up period