Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T04:50:26.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conservation of Billbergia zebrina genetic resources: AFLP polymorphism of in vitro regenerated genotypes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2011

Lirio L. Dal Vesco
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-graduação em Recursos Genéticos Vegetais, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 88.034-001Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
Valdir M. Stefenon
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pampa/Campus São Gabriel, 97300-000São Gabriel, RS, Brazil
Leocir J. Welter
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Pampa/Campus Itaqui, 97650-000Itaqui, RS, Brazil
Neusa Steiner
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-graduação em Recursos Genéticos Vegetais, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 88.034-001Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
Miguel P. Guerra*
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-graduação em Recursos Genéticos Vegetais, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 88.034-001Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: mpguerra@cca.ufsc.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Biotechnological techniques comprise useful tools for the conservation of endangered plant genetic resources. In the present work, polymorphism and usefulness of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers in assessing the genetic diversity in populations of Billbergia zebrina were investigated in nodular cultures and adult plants of the species. AFLP markers revealed moderate-to-high genetic diversity based on the estimations of Nei's gene diversity (mean He = 0.28), Shannon index of diversity (mean HS = 0.48) and the number of polymorphic fragments (mean of 56.17 polymorphic fragments over six primer pairs). In comparison to published studies of population genetics performed in other bromeliad species, the present study suggests that natural populations of B. zebrina likely maintain high levels of genetic diversity, an important feature towards conservation of plant genetic resources. The results obtained reveal that AFLP markers comprise a powerful tool in order to assess the levels of genetic diversity in natural populations of this endangered species. Integrating AFLP markers with in vitro propagation techniques is understood as an adequate strategy for conservation programmes of this species.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2011

Experimental

Plant material

Billbergia zebrina (Herbert) Lindley (Supplementary Fig. S1, available online only at http://journals.cambridge.org) is a bromeliad native to the Atlantic Rain Forest, classified as vulnerable in the List of Threatened Species of the Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil (FZB-RS, 2003). Aiming to evaluate the polymorphism of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers to assess the genetic diversity and to establish conservation strategies for this species, nodular cultures (NCs) and adult plants were genotyped and their relationship evaluated. DNA was extracted from 36 samples of NCs randomly collected among 12 treatments of micropropagation experiments (Dal Vesco et al., Reference Dal Vesco, Stefenon, Welter, Scherer and Guerra2011), comprising three samples per treatment. NCs were generated from a mix of mature capsules collected from two plants maintained in the bromeliad collection of the Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil. Leaf samples of three adult plants (Bz1, Bz2 and Bz3) were included, in order to determine the capacity of the AFLPs in discriminating among related and non-related individuals. Sample Bz1 corresponds to a wild individual non-related to other plants, while samples Bz2 and Bz3 are open-pollinated mother-plants of the seeds which originated the NCs. DNA was extracted as described by Stefenon et al. (Reference Stefenon, Nodari and Reis2003) from leaf samples of the adult plants and from about 0.85 g of each NC.

Molecular analysis

The AFLP fingerprint was performed as described by Stefenon et al. (Reference Stefenon, Gailing and Finkeldey2007), using the EcoRI and MseI restriction enzymes and its correspondent adapters and primers. The selective amplification was performed using six primer combinations: Eco-AAT+Mse-CAA, CTG, CTC, CAG, CTT and CAT. All PCR reactions were carried out in a C1000™ Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad). PCR products (1.0 μl) were combined with the internal size standard ET-ROX-500 (Applied Biosystems) and electrophoretically separated on a capillary genotyping platform MegaBACE-1000 (GE Healthcare). Fragments were scored and transformed into a binary matrix using Fragment Profiler Software version 1.2. Just fragments between 50 and 600 bp (>100 rescaled peak height) consistent through two runs were selected.

Data analysis

\begin{eqnarray} H _{s} = - \sum p _{ i }\,log_{2} p _{ i }. \end{eqnarray}

Assuming that natural populations of B. zebrina are in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, allelic frequencies p and q were computed from the frequency of the presence/absence of the peaks, assuming q = \sqrt { q } 2, where q 2 is the frequency of band absence and p = 1 − q. Heterozygosity was assessed as H e = 2n/2n-1(1 − ∑ip i2), where n denotes the number of individuals and p i is the frequency of alleles p and q (Nei, Reference Nei1987). Phenotypic diversity of presence/absence of the peaks was estimated using the Shannon's index of diversity, computed as H S = − ∑p ilog2p i (Lewontin, Reference Lewontin1972), where p i is the frequency of presence/absence of the peak. The correlation among number of polymorphic fragments, heterozygosity and Shannon's index was evaluated through the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r s).

The relationship among genotypes was assessed using the software PAUP 4.0 (Swofford, Reference Swofford2003) based on Nei and Li genetic distance (Nei and Li, Reference Nei and Li1979), through a clustering analysis (Neighbour-joining algorithm). Statistical support was assessed through 1000 bootstrap replicates.

Results and discussion

Using six primer pairs, a total of 337 reliable AFLP fragments were scored. The mean number of polymorphic loci was 56.17, the mean heterozigosity was H e = 0.28 and the mean Shannon's index of diversity equalled H S = 0.48 (Table 1). Weak non-significant correlation was found between the number of polymorphic fragments and the levels of genetic diversity (r s=0.014, P>0.05 for H e and r s= − 0.13, P>0.05 for H S) and between H e and H S (r s=0.03, P>0.05).

Table 1 Measures of genetic diversity of Billbergia zebrina, estimated over all loci and for each amplified fragment length polymorphism primer pair used

The clustering analysis (Fig. 1) revealed three main groups: group I, formed by the non-related adult plant Bz1; group II, comprised of the two mother-plants and 34 NCs, forming a large polytomy; and group III, formed by four NCs.

Fig. 1 Neighbour-joining dendrogram of all 39 plants, based on Nei and Li genetic distance. Number at the nodes is the bootstrap support after 1000 replications (a colour version of this figure can be found online at journals.cambridge.org/pgr).

Micropropagation protocols for B. zebrina were recently developed (Dal Vesco et al., Reference Dal Vesco, Stefenon, Welter, Scherer and Guerra2011) and recognized as an attractive alternative towards species conservation. Nevertheless, the selection of populations for conservation has to be based on sound scientific knowledge, particularly about the genetic variability of the species.

Levels of genetic diversity estimated from co-dominant allozyme and microsatellite markers in natural populations of bromeliads reveal from low to high variability, depending on the marker system and species analyzed (Supplementary Table S1, available online only at http://journals.cambridge.org)Footnote 1. The levels of AFLP polymorphism and genetic diversity observed in B. zebrina can be considered moderate to high, when compared to other studies using dominant markers in plants (Supplementary Table S1, available online only at http://journals.cambridge.org). Analyzing the genetic relationships among 77 individuals from 18 species of the genus Fosterella (Pitcairnioideae) with 13 AFLP primer pairs, Rex et al. (Reference Rex, Patzolt, Schulte, Zizka, Vásquez, Ibisch and Weising2007) observed between 30 and 52 polymorphic fragments. In Puya raimondii (Pitcairnioideae), Sgorbati et al. (Reference Sgorbati, Labra, Grugni, Barcaccia, Galasso, Boni, Mucciarelli, Citterio, Iramategui, Gonzales and Scannerini2004) found only five polymorphic AFLP fragments out of 217 loci. In B. zebrina, the number of polymorphic fragments ranged from 42 to 74. Similarly, the estimation of gene diversity achieved for B. zebrina is higher than the values of H e obtained from dominant markers in plant species sharing similar life history traits (Supplementary Table S1, available online only at http://journals.cambridge.org).

The moderate-to-high level of genetic diversity detected at AFLP markers in the present study suggests that natural populations of B. zebrina present high genetic diversity. Maintenance of such diversity has to be the focus of programmes of species conservation; and AFLP markers proved to be a very useful tool in assessing the genetic diversity of these populations.

The capability of the AFLP technique in assessing the genetic diversity in populations of B. zebrina is also demonstrated by its discriminatory potential, revealed by the higher differentiation of the non-related adult plant Bz1 in relation to the other genotypes and by the large polytomy, which represents the high similarity among 35 NCs propagated from two mother-plants that also grouped within this group. On the other hand, the low similarity revealed by four NCs in the clustering analysis may be the effect of somaclonal variation that occurred during the micropropagation process.

The molecular genetic analysis performed in the present study shows the high polymorphism of the AFLP markers and its usefulness for studies of genetic diversity in B. zebrina. In addition, the in vitro regenerative system based on NCs of B. zebrina allows the mass propagation of this bromeliad, presenting the high potential to be employed in conservation programmes.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank CAPES, CNPq, FINEP and FAPESC for fellowship, research grants and financial support for the development of this study.

References

Alves, GM, Rech Filho, AR, Puchalski, A, Reis, MS, Nodari, RO and Guerra, MP (2004) Allozymic markers and genetic characterization of a natural population of Vriesea friburgensis var. paludosa, a bromeliad from the Atlantic Forest. Plant Genetics Research 2: 2328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbará, T, Martinelli, G, Fay, MF, Mayo, SJ and Lexer, C (2007) Population differentiation and species cohesion in two closely related plants adapted to neotropical high-altitude ‘inselbergs’, Alcantarea imperialis and Alcantarea geniculata (Bromeliaceae). Molecular Ecology 16: 19811992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbará, T, Lexer, C, Martinelli, G, Mayo, SJ, Fay, MF and Heuertz, M (2008) Within-population spatial genetic structure in four naturally fragmented species of a neotropical inselberg radiation, Alcantarea imperialis, A. geniculata, A. glaziouana and A. regina (Bromeliaceae). Heredity 101: 285296.Google Scholar
Barbará, T, Martinelli, G, Palma-Silva, C, Fay, MF, Mayo, SJ and Lexer, C (2009) Genetic relationships and variation in reproductive strategies in four closely related bromeliads adapted to neotropical ‘inselbergs’: Alcantarea glaziouana, A. regina, A. geniculata and A. imperialis (Bromeliaceae). Annals of Botany 103: 6577.Google Scholar
Boisselier-Dubayle, M-C, Leblois, R, Samadi, S, Lambourdière, J and Sarthou, C (2010) Genetic structure of the xerophilous bromeliad Pitcairnia geyskesii on inselbergs in French Guiana – a test of the forest refuge hypothesis. Ecography 33: 175184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dal Vesco, LL, Stefenon, VM, Welter, LJ, Scherer, RF and Guerra, MP (2011) Induction and scale-up of Billbergia zebrina nodule cluster cultures: implications for mass propagation, improvement and conservation. Scientia Horticulturae 28: 515522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FZB-RS (2003) Lista Final das Espécies da Flora Ameaçada – RS – Decreto Estadual n. 42.099. Available at http://www.fzb.rs.gov.br/downloads/flora_ameacada.pdf (accessed in 1 November 2011).Google Scholar
Lewontin, RC (1972) The apportionment of human diversity. Evolutionary Biology 6: 381390.Google Scholar
Nei, M (1987) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nei, M and Li, W (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 76: 52695273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nybom, H (2004) Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants. Molecular Ecology 13: 11431155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nybon, H and Bartish, IV (2000) Effects of life history traits and sampling strategies on genetic diversity estimates obtained with RAPD markers in plants. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 3: 93114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palma-Silva, C, Lexer, C, Paggi, GM, Barbará, T, Bered, F and Bodanese-Zanettini, MH (2009) Range-wide patterns of nuclear and chloroplast DNA diversity in Vriesea gigantea (Bromeliaceae), a neotropical forest species. Heredity 103: 503512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palma-Silva, C, Wendt, T, Pinheiro, F, Barbará, T, Fay, MF, Cozzolino, S and Lexer, C (2011) Sympatric bromeliad species (Pitcairnia spp.) facilitate tests of mechanisms involved in species cohesion and reproductive isolation in Neotropical inselbergs. Molecular Ecology 20: 31853201.Google Scholar
Rex, M, Patzolt, K, Schulte, K, Zizka, G, Vásquez, R, Ibisch, PL and Weising, K (2007) AFLP analysis of genetic relationships in the genus Fosterella L.B. Smith (Pitcairnioideae, Bromeliaceae). Genome 50: 90105.Google Scholar
Rohlf, FJ (1998) NTSYSpc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System (Version 2.0). New York: Exeter Software.Google Scholar
Sgorbati, S, Labra, M, Grugni, E, Barcaccia, G, Galasso, G, Boni, U, Mucciarelli, M, Citterio, S, Iramategui, AB, Gonzales, LV and Scannerini, S (2004) A survey of genetic diversity and reproductive biology of Puya raimondii (Bromeliaceae), the endangered queen of the Andes. Plant Biology 6: 222230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solorzano, S, Solis, SJ and Davila, P (2010) Low genetic diversity in Tillandsia recurvata (Bromeliaceae), the most ubiquitous epiphyte species of the semiarid and arid zones of North America (Scientific). Journal of the Bromeliad Society 60: 7181.Google Scholar
Soltis, DE, Gilmartin, AJ, Rieseberg, L and Gardner, S (1987) Genetic variation in the epiphytes Tillandsia ionantha and T. recuvarta (Bromeliaceae). American Journal of Botany 74: 531537.Google Scholar
Stefenon, VM, Nodari, RO and Reis, MS (2003) AFLP protocol standardization and its informative capacity to genetic analysis in Araucaria angustifolia. Scientia Forestalis 64: 163171.Google Scholar
Stefenon, VM, Gailing, O and Finkeldey, R (2007) Genetic structure of Araucaria angustifolia (Araucariaceae) populations in Brazil: implications for the in situ conservation of genetic resources. Plant Biology 9: 516525.Google Scholar
Swofford, DL (2003) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Zanella, CM, Bruxel, M, Paggi, GM, Goetze, M, Buttow, MV, Cidade, FW and Bered, F (2011) Genetic structure and phenotypic variation in wild populations of the medicinal tetraploid species Bromelia antiacantha (Bromeliaceae). American Journal of Botany 98: 15111519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 Measures of genetic diversity of Billbergia zebrina, estimated over all loci and for each amplified fragment length polymorphism primer pair used

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Neighbour-joining dendrogram of all 39 plants, based on Nei and Li genetic distance. Number at the nodes is the bootstrap support after 1000 replications (a colour version of this figure can be found online at journals.cambridge.org/pgr).

Supplementary material: File

Guerraa Supplementary Material

Guerraa Supplementary Material

Download Guerraa Supplementary Material(File)
File 51.2 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Guerraa Supplementary Image

Guerraa Supplementary Image

Download Guerraa Supplementary Image(Image)
Image 79.8 KB