Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T13:03:49.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can ‘boost’ be avoided in pre-invasive and early breast cancer with free surgical margins after breast conservation surgery and irradiation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2011

Federico L. Ampil*
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences CenterShreveport, Louisiana, USA
Quyen Chu
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences CenterShreveport, Louisiana, USA
Gloria Caldito
Affiliation:
Department of Biometry, Louisiana State University Health Sciences CenterShreveport, Louisiana, USA
Benjamin D.L. Li
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences CenterShreveport, Louisiana, USA
Gary V. Burton
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, and Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
Roger H. Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences CenterShreveport, Louisiana, USA
*
Correspondence to: Federico L. Ampil, MD, Division of Therapeutic Radiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, Louisiana 71130, USA. Tel: (318) 675–5334; Fax: (318) 675–4697. E-mail: fampil@lsuhsc.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Guidelines concerning early stage breast cancer do not clearly recommend tumour bed boost dose after breast conserving surgery and irradiation when the resection margins are negative. Because the number of these patients is expected to increase, we evaluated the results of our treatment scheme in which the additional tumour bed dose was omitted. One hundred consecutive individuals with ductal carcinomain-situ or stage I or II cancer of the breast were identified for this retrospective analysis. The observed ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence and 10-year disease-free survival rates were 4% and 91% respectively. Univariate analysis indicated that triple receptor negative tumour is the most independent prognostic risk factor. In conclusion, the observed low rate of local recurrence and many long-term survivors in this study seem to legitimize the omission of the tumour bed boost dose after whole breast irradiation in women with early carcinoma of the breast and free breast conserving surgical margins.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Breast conservation therapy is an accepted standard of care for ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) and early stage cancer of the breast. The goals of this approach are survival equivalent to mastectomy, a low ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR) rate in the treated breast, and cosmesis.

Several randomized trials summarized in a recent review articleReference Jalali, Singh and Budrukkar1 about pre-invasive or early breast cancer (BCa) have shown that IBTRs are significantly reduced when an additional ‘boost’ dose to the tumor bed is administered after whole breast irradiation (WBI). However, it should be noted that the possibility of reduced cosmesis existsReference Collette, Collette and Budiharto2 and an improvement in overall survival has yet to be demonstrated with the use of the supplemental dose. Moreover, several investigatorsReference Arthur, Cuttino and Neuschatz3–Reference Wai, Lesperance and Alexander5 observed that such a tumour bed boost dose (TBBD) may not be required in patients with more favorable tumours, in which margins of resection are clearly negative and in which total WBI dose is at least 50 Gy.

BCa patients who receive less than definitive care are at excess risk for disease recurrence and mortality and, therefore, women with early stage disease should be treated in accordance with existing guidelines. National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2010 recommendations concerning invasive BCa indicate that WBI may be given with or without TBBD.

This retrospective study has two specific objectives: (1) to determine the frequency of IBTR and long-term prognosis when the TBBD is omitted after WBI: (2) to define the risk factors associated with IBTRs and decreased survival, which could confirm the decision to administer the additional dose especially in the younger population.

Approval to analyze our database was obtained from our Institutional Review Board. Between October 1992 and October 2005, 1,998 cases of BCa were diagnosed at the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in Shreveport. The 100 consecutive patients identified for this retrospective study shared a diagnosis of DCIS, stage I or II BCa, treatment by breast conservation surgery with WBI, and the omission of TBBD because of free resection margins. Free surgical margin was defined as the absence of tumour at least 2 mm away from the inked margin. Exclusion criteria consisted of stage III or IV BCa; failure to complete 50 Gy of WBI; referral elsewhere for radiotherapy; undergoing accelerated partial breast irradiation; and receiving tumour bed boost dose because of tumour-positive resection margins. WBI to a total dose of 50 Gy given in 25 fractions was administered using two tangential megavoltage (6 MV) photon beams. Adjuvant chemotherapy (usually given as four cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in 53 patients) was administered prior to WBI or hormonal manipulative therapy (Tamoxifen in 36 patients) was applied after irradiation. Study endpoints were cancer recurrence and death from any cause. The overall median follow-up period was 97.5 months (17–215 months). Overall disease-free survival was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analysis using the log-rank test was performed to identify variables that influenced overall survival.

The mean age was 58.5 years (28–80 years). Twenty-four patients were 45 years old or younger, whereas 76 women were older than 45 years. Eighty-eight cases were diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma; 3 were invasive lobular carcinoma; 7 were medullary, micropapillary, mucinous or tubular carcinomas; and 2 were invasive intraductal mixed with lobular carcinoma of the breast. Breast cancers graded according to the Scarff-Bloom-Richardson system were 4% grade 1, 54% grade 2, 27% grade 3, and 15% grade not known. The disease stages based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer system were Tis (9 cases), stage I (61 cases), IIA (17 cases) and IIB (13 cases). The status of the tumour receptors (estrogen, progesterone, and HER2-neu) was determined by immunohistochemistry; the known instances showed a positive result in 44%, 42%, and 19% of the cases, respectively.

Four people (4%) were disease-free with follow-up ranging from 48 to 93 months after salvage mastectomy for documented IBTRs (Table 1). IBTRs occurred in 2%, 6%, and 15% of patients with stage I, IIA, and IIB diseases, respectively; IBTRs appeared in 8% of patients who were 45 years of age or younger. Such an infrequent local relapse rate, in accord with the percentages from other accounts as summarized in a 2002 report,Reference Singletary6 could be attributed to the pre-WBI use of adjuvant chemotherapy or hormonal therapy. The very few IBTRs precluded a meaningful analysis of the associated risk factors. Regional relapse in the supraclavicular fossa, accompanied by visceral metastases in 4 women, was found in 5 individuals (5%); survival following chemotherapy ranged from 3 to 47 months. The locoregional relapse risk factors present in 8 of these 9 patients were of a young age and had additional histopathology such as triple-receptor negative tumour, a micropapillary type of BCa, lymphovascular/perineural invasion, or more than 4 positive axillary nodes. Most of these recurrences appeared 4 years or more after the diagnosis of BCa. A second primary malignant tumour (stage IV lung adenocarcinoma or multiple myeloma) was detected in 2 people; both died with the disease. The overall 10-year disease-free survival rate was 91% (Figure 1). Analysis indicated the triple receptor negative tumour as the only independent prognostic risk factor (Table 2).

Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier overall disease-free survival at 10 years of patients with pre-invasive or early stage breast cancer managed by breast conserving surgery and irradiation without tumour bed boost dose.

Table 1. Oncological outcome

*Follow-up (range 46–215 months); **Survival (range 17–130 months).

aIncluded four patients with ipsilateral breast tumour recurrences and an individual with regional relapse who were rescued by salvage surgery; bMultiple myeloma, lung adenocarcinoma.

Table 2. Univariate analysis of survival

Evaluable patients (an = 24 vs n = 76; bn = 58 vs n = 27; cn = 31 vs n = 69; dn = 46 vs n = 22).

*Scarff-Bloom-Richardson tumour grading classification.

**Illnesses (i.e., hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis).

This review of cases emphasizes the importance of clinical audit, since ‘IBTR rates in excess of 10% at 5 years are associated with increased BCa mortality at 15 years.’Reference Kaufmann, Morrow, von Minckwitz and Harris7 In conclusion, despite the observed favorable results, the question of whether or not to administer TBBD in people with tumour-free margins of resection cannot be firmly answered considering the retrospective nature and non-randomized design of the investigation. We believe that the estimated IBTR risk based on patient age and additional histopathology (i.e., presence of lymphovascular invasion and high grade tumour) would better define the subgroup of individuals who will need TBBD.

References

Jalali, R, Singh, S, Budrukkar, A. Techniques of tumour bed boost irradiation in breast conserving therapy: current evidence and suggested guidelines. Acta Oncol 2007; 46:879892.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collette, S, Collette, L, Budiharto, Tet al. Predictors of the risk of fibrosis at 10 years after breast conserving therapy for early breast cancer: a study based on the EORTC Trial 22881–10882 ‘boost versus no boost’. Eur J Cancer 2008; 44:25872599.Google Scholar
Arthur, DW, Cuttino, LW, Neuschatz, ACet al. Tumor bed boost omission after negative re-excision in breast-conservation treatment. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13:794801.Google Scholar
Pezner, RD, Lipsett, JA, Desai, Ket al. To boost or not to boost: decreasing radiation therapy in conservative breast cancer treatment when “inked” tumor resection margins are pathologically free of cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1988; 14:873877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wai, ES, Lesperance, ML, Alexander, CSet al. Effect of radiotherapy boost and hypofractionation on outcomes in ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer 2011; 117:5462.Google Scholar
Singletary, SE. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg 2002; 184:383393.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, M, Morrow, M, von Minckwitz, G, Harris, JR. Locoregional treatment of primary breast cancer: consensus recommendations from an International Expert Panel. Cancer 2010; 116:11841191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier overall disease-free survival at 10 years of patients with pre-invasive or early stage breast cancer managed by breast conserving surgery and irradiation without tumour bed boost dose.

Figure 1

Table 1. Oncological outcome

Figure 2

Table 2. Univariate analysis of survival