Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T22:47:45.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tetrapotassium pyrophosphates γ- and δ-K4P2O7

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2013

Armel Le Bail*
Affiliation:
Institut des Molécules et des Matériaux du Mans, CNRS UMR 6283, Université du Maine, Avenue O. Messiaen, 72085 Le Mans, France
Thomas Hansen
Affiliation:
Institut Laue Langevin, 38042 Grenoble, France
Wilson A. Crichton
Affiliation:
European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, BP 220, 38043 Grenoble, France
*
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: armel.le_bail@univ-lemans.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The structures of γ- and δ-K4P2O7 are solved by X-ray powder diffraction (conventional laboratory X-ray and synchrotron data, respectively), both in hexagonal symmetry (aγ = 5.9645(3) Å, cγ = 14.4972(8) Å, Vγ = 446.64(4) Å3 at 300 °C, Zγ = 2, space group P63/mmc; aδ = 10.211 45(7) Å, cδ = 42.6958(4) Å, Vδ = 3855.59(7) Å3 at room temperature, Zδ = 18, space group P61) with cell–supercell relations $a_\delta \approx a_\gamma \sqrt{3}$ and cδ ≈ 3 cγ. In the experimental conditions, the expected β/γ transition previously announced at 486 °C is not observed; the γ-form is stable at least up to the maximum temperature of our measurements (700 °C). In the γ-form, similar to the orthorhombic form of Na4P2O7, idealized, the pyrophosphate group is in eclipsed conformation, the K+ cations occupying three different coordinations. In the δδ-form, two of the three different [P2O7]4− groups are staggered and one eclipsed, the K+ cations occupying 12 independent sites.

Type
Technical Articles
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 2013 

I. INTRODUCTION

Tetrapotassium pyrophosphate (TKPP) K4P2O7 is a material widely used as a sequestrant, dispersant and deflocculant. It is found in daily-life chemical formulations as an industrial or household detergent builder, tooth cleaning agent, and ingredient in the food industry (E450v). It is applied to cyanide-free electroplating, can be used as a stabilizer for hydrogen peroxide, or as dispersion agent for ceramic, clay, latex, and pigments. It is employed frequently as a component in solid or liquid fertilizers (60% solubility in water). Despite the millions of tons of commercialized TKPP, none of the four anhydrous forms have been characterized crystallographically, though the polymorphic transitions were examined by thermal, X-ray, and dilatometric methods (α/β transition at 1080 °C, β/γ at 486 °C, and γ/δ at 280 °C) by Znamierowska (Reference Znamierowska1978). The room temperature δ-form is highly hygroscopic, leading rapidly to K4P2O7•3H2O when exposed to air, so that most industrial users without care are probably dealing with the trihydrate. The structure of this hydrated form was determined from single crystal data (Dumas and Galigné, Reference Dumas and Galigné1974). TKPP also repeatedly appears during investigations of a huge list of phase diagrams including the important Ln2O3–K2O–P2O5 oxide systems (Szczygieł et al., Reference Szczygieł, Znamierowska and Mizer2010 and references therein), though the existence of the β-form was contested (Sandström, Reference Sandström2006). Indeed, only two anhydrous forms were long believed to exist (Durif, Reference Durif1995) before the Znamierowska work, and a complete series of solid solutions was defined in the Na4P2O7–K4P2O7 system (Morey et al., Reference Morey, Boyd, England and Chen1955). Finally, Shekhtman et al. (Reference Shekhtman, Smirnov and Burmakin2000) concluded that there were three polymorph modifications of K4P2O7 below 300 °C, denoted γ above 290 °C, but α below 270 °C and claimed a β-form in the 270–290 °C range, never citing Znamierowska's previous work. Staying in the Znamierowska notation, the existence and crystal structures of the β-, γ-, and δ-K4P2O7 forms, are the subject of the present paper. The high temperature α-form with the α/β transition at 1080 °C very close to the fusion at 1105 °C (Znamierowska, Reference Znamierowska1978) was not accessible with our X-ray instrumentation. In spite of the absence of single crystals, solving the structures is realized from powder diffraction data by using methodologies which have demonstrated their efficiency during repeated blind tests (Le Bail et al., Reference Le Bail, Cranswick, Adil, Altomare, Avdeev, Cerny, Cuocci, Giacovazzo, Halasz, Lapidus, Louwen, Moliterni, Palatinus, Rizzi, Schilder, Stephens, Stone and van Mechelen2009).

II. EXPERIMENTAL

The thermal behaviour of a K4P2O7 sample from Sigma–Aldrich was followed by temperature resolved powder diffractometry (TXRD) (Siemens D5000 θ/θ diffractometer equipped with an Elphyse position-sensitive detector and a HTK10 Anton Paar temperature attachment). The sample was dusted on a platinum foil serving as heating source in a chamber pumped under vacuum, then filled with dried helium. A light He flow was maintained during the experiment. The time interval between successive powder patterns was 2880 s, including a measuring time of 2580 s; the temperature was increased by steps of 10 °C starting from 30 to 700 °C. Cu radiation was used; measurements were from 9° to 139° in 0.03°2θ steps. A contour scale plot is shown in Figure 1. The starting material contained traces of the hydrated phase which retransformed readily at 50 °C into the δ-K4P2O7 anhydrous phase. The expected δ → γ transition occurs at ~280 °C; however, the event announced at 486 °C for the γ → β transition (Znamierowska, Reference Znamierowska1978) remains undetected up to 700 °C, confirming the similar non-observation (by thermal analysis and powder TXRD by 100 °C steps, no indexing) by Sandström (Reference Sandström2006). Another TXRD was performed in the range 30–300–30 °C in steps of 5 °C in the 260–300–260 °C range and 10 °C elsewhere, establishing the reversibility of the transition which, under these conditions, appears to be close to 275 °C, also showing pre-transitional effects (accelerated cell parameter and intensities changes) occurring in the 230–270 °C range. Events in the 220–250 °C range during fast (3 °C/min) neutron thermodiffractomy experiments (instrument D20, ILL, Grenoble) confirmed the possibility of another phase transition close to 270 °C by Shekhtman et al. (Reference Shekhtman, Smirnov and Burmakin2000), but these data were of no help in indexing attempts (see the neutron contour plots in supplementary material available at http://journals.cambridge.org/pdj)). Given the difficulties in solving the δ-K4P2O7 crystal structure from such conventional laboratory or neutron data (due to the large cell dimensions), a synchrotron pattern was recorded at ESRF (Grenoble) on the ID31 instrument (Fitch, Reference Fitch2004), λ = 0.399 90 Å from a sample loaded in a (0.9 mm) capillary as trihydrate, dried and fired at 500 °C, then sealed in the oven.

Figure 1. TXRD contour plot (Cu).

III. INDEXING, STRUCTURE DETERMINATIONS AND RIETVELD REFINEMENTS

A. γ-K4P2O7 at 300 and 600 °C from conventional X-ray data

The γ-form being simpler than the one at room temperature, it was first indexed easily in a hexagonal cell by various software, including McMaille (Le Bail, Reference Le Bail2004). The FoMs (Figures of Merit) for the pattern selected at 300 °C were M 20 = 54.6 (de Wolf, Reference de Wolf1968), F 20 = 54.5 (0.0111, 33) (Smith and Snyder, Reference Smith and Snyder1979) and McM 20 = 165.5 (Le Bail, Reference Le Bail, Clearfield, Reibenspies and Bhuvanesh2008). The cell volume suggested Z = 2. Using Le Bail fitting (Le Bail, Reference Le Bail2005) for evaluating the reliability of the indexing and for intensity extraction, the P63/mmc space group was the most probable. The structure solution was carried out in direct space using the ESPOIR software (Le Bail, Reference Le Bail2001), moving in the cell (by a Monte Carlo process) various numbers of K, P, and O atoms. This led to the best solution with R = 14% on the first 120 hkl extracted at low diffraction angles. Refinements were undertaken by Rietveld (Reference Rietveld1969) FULLPROF software (Rodriguez-Carvajal, Reference Rodriguez-Carvajal1993). Patterns in the 280–700 °C range could be fitted continuously with the structural model of the γ-form. No clear-cut event was observed on the cell parameters or atomic coordinates as a function of temperature. This confirms the same non-observation of the β/γ phase transition at 486 °C by Sandström (Reference Sandström2006). This transition thermal effect was described by Znamierowska (Reference Znamierowska1978) appearing only “as a result of prolonged heating of powdered melts at 500 °C and is rather weak.” The Rietveld fits for the λ-form at 300 °C and at 600 °C (much above the expected β/γ transition at 486 °C) are shown in Figures 2 and 3. The 115–139°2θ range was excluded from the refinement, being essentially dominated by two peaks from the Pt holder. The Rietveld refinement details, the atomic coordinates, selected geometric parameters, and X-ray diffraction data are shown in Tables I–IV, respectively.

Figure 2. Rietveld plot for γ-K4P2O7 at 300 °C (Cu). The second phase corresponds to the Pt holder.

Figure 3. Rietveld plot for K4P2O7 at 600 °C (Cu). The second phase corresponds to the Pt holder.

Table I. Experimental and Rietveld refinement details for the γ-K4P2O7 form at 300 and 600 °C.

Table II. Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) for the γ-K4P2O7 form at 300 °C (first line) and 600 °C (second line if different value) in the P63/mmc space group; BV is the bond-valence calculated according to Brese and O'Keefe (Reference Brese and O'Keefe1991).

Table III. Selected interatomic distances (Å) for the γ-K4P2O7 form at 300 °C (first line) and 600 °C (second line).

Table IV. X-ray diffraction data for the γ-K4P2O7 form at 300 °C (CuK α1). Observed values from EVA software (Bruker).

B. δ-K4P2O7 from synchrotron data

The room-temperature phase could not be indexed from low-resolution TXRD data. A large hexagonal cell could be deduced from new conventional data (Cu) from a Rigaku Miniflex diffractometer (an oven-dried sample was transferred to the standard flat-plate holder and stored in a heat-sealed plastic bag ‘immediately’), but the structure solution was not obtained until synchrotron data (ESRF – Grenoble, instrument ID31, λ = 0.399 90 Å) were recorded. Various indexing software including McMaille, yielded a hexagonal supercell with $a_\delta = a_\gamma \sqrt{3}$ and c δ = 3 c γ, leading to Z = 18 (M 20 = 84.3, F 20 = 749 (0.0005, 43) and McM 20 = 181.4). Since the only systematic extinction corresponds to 00l, l = 6n, the space group is either P6122, P6522, P61 or P65. Incomplete starting models were obtained either by the direct method approach using SHELXS (Sheldrick, Reference Sheldrick2008) or in direct space by using ESPOIR (Le Bail, Reference Le Bail2001). However, given the clear relation between both phases, refinements were attempted by starting directly from the γ-K4P2O7 structure expanded, using the CRYSCON software (Dowty, Reference Dowty2006), to fit in all possible space groups for the supercell, and using restraints forcing the existence of the P2O7 groups. A best fit was clearly obtained in the P61 space group. Anisotropic line broadening was detected and treated phenomenologically by separating the peaks into three categories, 00l, hk0, and the others, obtaining a decrease from R P = 12.8% and R WP = 13.7% to R P = 9.25% and R WP = 8.71%. The hk0 lines present the smallest full width at half maximum (0.0055–0.0680°) in the whole °2θ range (2–31°) and the 00l lines present the largest ones (0.0191–0.0924°); other lines show FWHMs between 0.0083° and 0.0805°. The Rietveld fit is in Figure 4, the Rietveld refinement details, the atomic coordinates, selected geometric parameters, and X-ray diffraction data are shown in Tables V–VIII, respectively.

Figure 4. Rietveld plot for δ-K4P2O7 (synchrotron powder pattern on instrument ID31, ESRF) at room temperature (λ = 0.399 90 Å).

Table V. Experimental and Rietveld refinement details for the δ-K4P2O7 form at room temperature.

Table VI. Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) for the δ-K4P2O7 form in the P61 space group (all atoms in general Wyckoff position 6a); Δγ is the amplitude of the displacement (Å) of the atoms after joining their sites in the γ-form at 300 °C; BV is the bond-valence calculated according to Brese and O'Keefe (Reference Brese and O'Keefe1991).

*Fixed origin along the z-axis.

Table VII. Selected interatomic distances (Å) for the δ-K4P2O7 form.

Table VIII. X-ray diffraction data for the δ-K4P2O7 form (λ = 0.399 90 Å). Observed values from EVA software (Bruker).

IV. STRUCTURES DESCRIPTIONS AND DISCUSSION

The γ-form (Figure 5) looks like an idealized view of the structure of Na4P2O7, which, though orthorhombic (space group P212121), is pseudo-hexagonal with $a \sim b \sqrt{3}$ and with a similar c parameter (Leung and Calvo, Reference Leung and Calvo1972). The distorted 6-fold coordinations of two of the four independent Na sites disposed in chains of cations along the c-axis in Na4P2O7 become K3 and K2 alternating octahedra and trigonal prisms (TPs) sharing faces (Figure 6). The two other Na sites in the tetrasodium pyrophosphate in 5-fold coordination become K1 in a strange 9-fold coordination with a hexagonal face as a basis of the polyhedron and a triangle from a PO4 tetrahedron face at the top. Two such polyhedra have their hexagonal face building an empty hexagonal prism of oxygen atoms (Figure 7). The pyrophosphate group is in an eclipsed conformation. Two potassium-rare-earth silicates K3RESi2O7 (RE = Lu, Sc) adopt a similar structure as γ-K4P2O7, same space group and very close cell parameters, the rare-earth replacing the K3 atom in octahedral coordination (Vidican et al., Reference Vidican, Smith and zur Loye2003; Napper et al., Reference Napper, Layland, Smith and zur Loye2004). For the γ-form, the P–O distances were not constrained, resulting in values reasonably close to the standard ones (Table III), though the bond valence calculated values (Table II) are far too large for K3 (1.54 instead of 1) in 6-fold coordination and too small for K1 (0.66). This, and the fact that the P–O distances are slightly shorter at 600 °C than at 300 °C, gives another proof that the accuracy from powder data cannot beat that from a single crystal. For the δ-form, in spite of the synchrotron data quality, strong divergences occurred with the expected values so that the P–O distances were restrained to be close to those in the CaK2P2O7 crystal structure (Sandström et al., Reference Sandström, Fischer and Boström2003), with the P–O bond involved in the P–O–P at 1.634 Å and the others at 1.514 Å. The δ-form projections along the c-axis (Figure 8) and along the [110]-direction (Figure 9) evidence helicoïdal (61) modulation of the pyrophosphate groups and of the K+ cations, with considerable moves (though always less than 1 Å, see the amplitude Δγ of the displacement for each atom Table VI) if compared with the γ-form (Figure 5). However, such displacements are larger than those occurring at the phase transition, since the intensities and positions of the diffraction peaks of the δ-form continuously evolve closer to those of the γ-form in the range 20–260 °C. Unfortunately, a refinement at 260° from the conventional X-ray laboratory data is even more unstable than from the synchrotron data at room temperature and the atomic coordinates would be too uncertain. The coordinations of the K atoms (with upper limitation to K–O = 3.5 Å) are no longer as symmetrical as they were in the γ-form. We examine first those K1, K2, K5, K6, K7, and K8 atoms which will become the K1 type in the γ-form (coordination 6 + 3). In no case does the hexagonal plane of six oxygen atoms exist at room temperature; it transforms each time into a distorted plane of 5 oxygen atoms. Moreover, the PO4 tetrahedron face providing three oxygen atoms is sometimes displaced so as to share with either an edge or a corner, and a supplementary oxygen atom may contribute to potassium coordination on the other side of the pentagonal face. According to this description, the K1O7 polyhedron coordination is 5 + 2, close to be a monocapped TP; K2O8 has a 1 + 5 + 2 coordination; K5O8, K7O8, and K8O8 have lost one oxygen atom of the hexagonal plane but still share a face with a PO4 tetrahedron, leading to the 5 + 3 coordination; K6O7 can be described as a 1 + 5 + 1 pentagonal bipyramid. For those K3, K9, and K10 atoms of the δ-form, forming the K2O6 TP in the γ-form, K3O8 is a highly distorted bicapped TP; K9O9 looks like a very distorted tricapped TP, the main distortion coming from face sharing with a PO4 tetrahedron; K10O6 is a TP. For those K4, K11, and K12 atoms of the δ-form, forming the K3O6 octahedra in the γ-form, K4O6 and K12O6 are both octahedra and K11O7 is a monocapped TP. Two of the three different [P2O7]4− groups are staggered (average torsion angles O–P1···4–O = 60° and O–P2···P3–O = 67°), the third is eclipsed (O–P5···P6–O = 11°). This complex ordering at room temperature is probably not free from stacking faults along the c-axis, as suggested by the anisotropic line broadening and the fact that the 00l lines are the broadest. This broadening, intrinsic to the sample, considerably decreases the resolution and explains the difficulties in refining all coordinates without distance restraints in the [P2O7]4− groups, despite the use of instrumental high-resolution synchrotron powder data. Finally, the bond valence calculations (Table VI) look better than for the γ-form, though K10, in a TP, presents a large bond valence (1.45 instead of 1). The very similar bond valence values for the six P atoms (4.82 ± 0.02 instead of five) is the consequence of the distance restraint on the PO4 tetrahedra.

Figure 5. Projection along the c-axis of the structure of γ-K4P2O7 at 300 °C showing the eclipsed pyrophosphate groups, and columns of potassium atoms K2 and K3.

Figure 6. View of the structure of γ-K4P2O7 at 300 °C showing the columns of potassium atoms K2 and K3 alternating K3O6 octahedra and K2O6 TPs sharing faces along the c-axis.

Figure 7. K1O9 polyhedra in γ-K4P2O7 at 300 °C opposing their hexagonal faces.

Figure 8. Projection along the c-axis of the structure of δ-K4P2O7.

Figure 9. Projection along the [110]-direction of the structure of δ-K4P2O7.

V. CONCLUSION

The γ-form of K4P2O7 is shown to be related to the orthorhombic form of Na4P2O7, whereas the room temperature form δ-K4P2O7 is derived from the γ-form by considerable atom shifts leading to a hexagonal supercell nine times larger in volume. The existence of the β-K4P2O7 form is not confirmed at the temperature previously announced. However, since the maximum temperature attained in this study is 700 °C, less than the expected α/β transition, and given the large number of papers where δ- and γ-K4P2O7 are cited since 1978, their Greek letter numbering was not changed. More work is needed in order to characterize the additional events (220–250 °C) observed in the fast-heating-rate neutron data.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Supplementary material referred to in this article can be found online at journals.cambridge.org/pdj.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Thanks are due to Andrew N. Fitch for data collection (ID31) at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility.

References

Brese, N. E. and O'Keefe, M. (1991). “Bond-valence parameters for solids,” Acta Crystallogr. B47, 192197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Wolf, P. M. (1968). “A simplified criterion for the reliability of a powder pattern indexing,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1, 108113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, E. (2006). CRYSCON, version 1.2.1, Shape Software, Kingsport, USA.Google Scholar
Dumas, Y. and Galigné, J. L. (1974). “Structure cristalline du pyrophosphate tétrapotassique trihydraté, K4P2O7•3H2O,” Acta Crystallogr. B30, 390395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durif, A. (1995). Crystal Chemistry of Condensed Phosphates (Plenum Press, New York) p. 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, A. N. (2004). “The high resolution powder diffraction beam line at ESRF,” J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 109, 133142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gražulis, S., Chateigner, D., Downs, R. T., Yokochi, A. F. T., Quirós, M., Lutterotti, L., Manakova, E., Butkus, J., Moeck, P. and Le Bail, A. (2009). “Crystallography Open Database – an open-access collection of crystal structures,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 42, 726729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Bail, A. (2001). “ESPOIR: a program for solving structures by Monte Carlo from powder diffraction data,” Mater. Sci. Forum 378–381, 6570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Bail, A. (2004). “Monte Carlo indexing with McMaille,” Powder Diffr. 19, 249254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Bail, A. (2005). “Whole powder pattern decomposition methods and applications – a retrospection,” Powder Diffr. 20, 316326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Bail, A. (2008). “Structure solution,” in Principles and Applications of Powder Diffraction, edited by Clearfield, A., Reibenspies, J. and Bhuvanesh, N. (Wiley, New York), pp. 261309.Google Scholar
Le Bail, A, Cranswick, L. M. D., Adil, K., Altomare, A., Avdeev, M., Cerny, R., Cuocci, C., Giacovazzo, C., Halasz, I., Lapidus, S. H., Louwen, J. N., Moliterni, A., Palatinus, L., Rizzi, R., Schilder, E. C., Stephens, P. W., Stone, K. H., and van Mechelen, J. (2009). “Third structure determination by powder diffractometry round robin (SDPDRR-3),” Powder Diffr. 24, 254262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, K. Y. and Calvo, C. (1972). “The structure of Na4P2O7 at 22 °C,” Can J. Chem. 50, 25192526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morey, G. W., Boyd, Jr F. R., England, J. L. and Chen, W. T. (1955). “The system NaPO3–Na4P2O7–K4P2O7–KPO3,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77, 50035011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Napper, J. D., Layland, R. C., Smith, M. D. and zur Loye, H.-C. (2004). “Crystal growth and structure determination of the new silicate K3ScSi2O7,” J. Chem. Crystallogr. 34, 347351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rietveld, H. M. (1969). “A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2, 6571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Carvajal, J. (1993). “Recent advances in magnetic-structure determination by neutron powder diffraction,” Physica B, 192, 5569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandström, M. (2006). “Structural and solid state EMF studies of phases in the CaO–K2O–P2O5 system with relevance for biomass combustion,” PhD Thesis, Umeå University, Sweden.Google Scholar
Sandström, M., Fischer, A. and Boström, D. (2003). “CaK2P2O7,” Acta Crystallogr. E59, i139i141.Google Scholar
Shekhtman, G. Sh., Smirnov, N. B. and Burmakin, E. I. (2000). “Electroconductivity of solid solutions in the K4P2O7-Rb4P2O7 system,” Russ. J. Electrochem. 36, 435437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldrick, G. (2008). “A short history of SHELX,” Acta Crystallogr. A64, 112122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. S. and Snyder, R. L. (1979). “FN: a criterion for rating powder diffraction patterns and evaluating the reliability of powder-pattern indexing,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 12, 6065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szczygieł, I., Znamierowska, T. and Mizer, D. (2010). “Phase equilibria in the oxide system Nd2O3–K2O–P2O5,” Solid State Sci. 12, 12051210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidican, I., Smith, M. D. and zur Loye, H. -C. (2003). “Crystal growth, structure determination, and optical properties of new potassium-rare-earth silicates K3RESi2O7 (RE = Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu),” J. Solid State Chem. 179, 203210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Znamierowska, T. (1978). “Phase equilibria in the system CaO–K2O–P2O5. Part III. The partial system CaK2P2O7–K4P2O7–KPO3,” Pol. J. Chem. 52, 18891895.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. TXRD contour plot (Cu).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Rietveld plot for γ-K4P2O7 at 300 °C (Cu). The second phase corresponds to the Pt holder.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Rietveld plot for K4P2O7 at 600 °C (Cu). The second phase corresponds to the Pt holder.

Figure 3

Table I. Experimental and Rietveld refinement details for the γ-K4P2O7 form at 300 and 600 °C.

Figure 4

Table II. Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) for the γ-K4P2O7 form at 300 °C (first line) and 600 °C (second line if different value) in the P63/mmc space group; BV is the bond-valence calculated according to Brese and O'Keefe (1991).

Figure 5

Table III. Selected interatomic distances (Å) for the γ-K4P2O7 form at 300 °C (first line) and 600 °C (second line).

Figure 6

Table IV. X-ray diffraction data for the γ-K4P2O7 form at 300 °C (CuK α1). Observed values from EVA software (Bruker).

Figure 7

Figure 4. Rietveld plot for δ-K4P2O7 (synchrotron powder pattern on instrument ID31, ESRF) at room temperature (λ = 0.399 90 Å).

Figure 8

Table V. Experimental and Rietveld refinement details for the δ-K4P2O7 form at room temperature.

Figure 9

Table VI. Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) for the δ-K4P2O7 form in the P61 space group (all atoms in general Wyckoff position 6a); Δγ is the amplitude of the displacement (Å) of the atoms after joining their sites in the γ-form at 300 °C; BV is the bond-valence calculated according to Brese and O'Keefe (1991).

Figure 10

Table VII. Selected interatomic distances (Å) for the δ-K4P2O7 form.

Figure 11

Table VIII. X-ray diffraction data for the δ-K4P2O7 form (λ = 0.399 90 Å). Observed values from EVA software (Bruker).

Figure 12

Figure 5. Projection along the c-axis of the structure of γ-K4P2O7 at 300 °C showing the eclipsed pyrophosphate groups, and columns of potassium atoms K2 and K3.

Figure 13

Figure 6. View of the structure of γ-K4P2O7 at 300 °C showing the columns of potassium atoms K2 and K3 alternating K3O6 octahedra and K2O6 TPs sharing faces along the c-axis.

Figure 14

Figure 7. K1O9 polyhedra in γ-K4P2O7 at 300 °C opposing their hexagonal faces.

Figure 15

Figure 8. Projection along the c-axis of the structure of δ-K4P2O7.

Figure 16

Figure 9. Projection along the [110]-direction of the structure of δ-K4P2O7.