Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T15:26:42.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mannheimia haemolytica and bovine respiratory disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2008

J. A. Rice
Affiliation:
Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN, USA
L. Carrasco-Medina
Affiliation:
Department of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
D. C. Hodgins
Affiliation:
Department of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
P. E. Shewen*
Affiliation:
Department of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: pshewen@uoguelph.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mannheimia haemolytica is the principal bacterium isolated from respiratory disease in feedlot cattle and is a significant component of enzootic pneumonia in all neonatal calves. A commensal of the nasopharynx, M. haemolytica is an opportunist, gaining access to the lungs when host defenses are compromised by stress or infection with respiratory viruses or mycoplasma. Although several serotypes act as commensals, A1 and A6 are the most frequent isolates from pneumonic lungs. Potential virulence factors include adhesin, capsular polysaccharide, fimbriae, iron-regulated outer membrane proteins, leukotoxin (Lkt), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), lipoproteins, neuraminidase, sialoglycoprotease and transferrin-binding proteins. Of these, Lkt is pivotal in induction of pneumonia. Lkt-mediated infiltration and destruction of neutrophils and other leukocytes impairs bacterial clearance and contributes to development of fibrinous pneumonia. LPS may act synergistically with Lkt, enhancing its effects and contributing endotoxic activity. Antibiotics are employed extensively in the feedlot industry, both prophylactically and therapeutically, but their efficacy varies because of inconsistencies in diagnosis and treatment regimes and development of antibiotic resistance. Vaccines have been used for many decades, even though traditional bacterins failed to demonstrate protection and their use often enhanced disease in vaccinated animals. Modern vaccines use culture supernatants containing Lkt and other soluble antigens, or bacterial extracts, alone or combined with bacterins. These vaccines have 50–70% efficacy in prevention of M. haemolytica pneumonia. Effective control of M. haemolytica pneumonia is likely to require a combination of more definitive diagnosis, efficacious vaccines, therapeutic intervention and improved management practices.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Introduction

Mannheimia haemolytica is a bovine pathogen of considerable economic importance to the global cattle industry and in particular to the North American feedlot industry. Although the organism naturally exists as a commensal of the upper respiratory tract and nasopharynx of healthy ruminants (Frank, Reference Frank, Adlam and Rutter1989; Carter et al., Reference Carter, Chengappa and Roberts1995), it is also associated with the diseased state, pneumonic pasteurellosis, and is considered the major bacterial agent of bovine respiratory disease complex. The organism may cause disease in young calves as a component of enzootic pneumonia of beef and dairy calves (Kiorpes et al., Reference Kiorpes, Butler, Dubielzig and Beck1988; Van Donkersgoed et al., Reference Van Donkersgoed, Ribble, Boyer and Townsend1993a; Ames, Reference Ames1997); however, its greatest impact occurs in recently weaned beef calves shortly after entry to feedlots (Jubb and Kennedy, Reference Jubb and Kennedy1970; Mosier et al., Reference Mosier, Confer and Panciera1989; Wilson, Reference Wilson1989). Economic losses to the North American feedlot industry due to respiratory disease have been estimated to be as high as 1 billion dollars annually (Whiteley et al., Reference Whiteley, Maheswaran, Weiss, Ames and Kannan1992). Despite improved management practices and extensive use of vaccination programs, bovine respiratory disease continues to be a major cause of losses in feedlot cattle.

Clinically, cattle suffering from M. haemolytica respiratory infections may have fever, nasal discharge, cough and respiratory distress along with inappetance and weight loss (Friend et al., Reference Friend, Wilkie, Thomson and Barnum1977). The major cause of death is acute fibrinous pleuropneumonia. Necropsy findings include obstruction of bronchioles with fibrinous exudate, accumulation of neutrophils, macrophages and fibrin in the alveoli, and thrombosis and distention of lymphatic vessels.

The organism

M. haemolytica is a Gram-negative, non-motile, non-spore-forming, fermentative, oxidase-positive, facultative anaerobic coccobacillus (Quinn, Reference Quinn1994; Hirsh and Zee, Reference Hirsh and Zee1999). The organism is a member of the family Pasteurellaceae, genus Mannheimia. First named Bacterium bipolare multocidum by Theodore Kitt (Kitt, Reference Kitt1885), it was renamed Pasteurella haemolytica in 1932, to reflect its weakly hemolytic phenotype on sheep's blood agar plates (Newsome and Cross, Reference Newsome and Cross1932) and was historically classified into 16 serotypes, based on an indirect hemagglutination test using extractable capsular surface antigens (Biberstein, Reference Biberstein, Bergan and Norris1978). The genus was further divided into distinct biotypes (A and T) based on the ability to ferment arabinose or trehalose, respectively (Smith, Reference Smith1961; Lo and Shewen, Reference Lo, Shewen, Balows, Truper, Dworkin, Harder and Schliefer1991). Twelve A serotypes and four T serotypes were identified. Later, Younan and Fodor (Reference Younan and Fodor1995) characterized a new serotype of M. haemolytica, A17, isolated from sheep in Syria. Through DNA–DNA hybridization studies and 16S RNA sequencing, all but one of the A biotypes were assigned the species designation M. haemolytica (Angen et al., Reference Angen, Mutters, Caugant, Olsen and Bisgaard1999a). P. haemolytica T biotypes were renamed Pasteurella trehalosi (Bingham et al., Reference Bingham, Moore and Richards1990; Sneath and Stevens, Reference Sneath and Stevens1990), then Bibersteinia trehalosi (Blackall et al., Reference Blackall, Bojesen, Christensen and Bisgaard2007). The remaining A11 serotype was renamed Mannheimia glucosida (Angen et al., Reference Angen, Quirie, Donachie and Bisgaard1999b).

M. haemolytica comprises 12 capsular serotypes based on those originally assigned to P. haemolytica (A1, A2, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9, A12, A13, A14, A16 and A17) (Angen et al., Reference Angen, Quirie, Donachie and Bisgaard1999b). Both serotypes A1 and A2 colonize the upper respiratory tract of cattle and sheep. Pneumonia in cattle is mainly associated with isolation of serotype A1 from lungs at necropsy (Frank and Smith, Reference Frank and Smith1983; Allan et al., Reference Allan, Wiseman, Gibbs and Selman1985), even though healthy cattle frequently carry both serotypes A1 and A2 in the nasopharynx. Davies et al. (Reference Davies, Whittam and Selander2001) state that `serotype A1 and A6 strains account for almost all cases of bovine pneumonic pasteurellosis', and recent surveys in Germany (Ewers et al., Reference Ewers, Lubke-Becker and Wieler2004) and the USA (Purdy et al., Reference Purdy, Raleigh, Collins, Watts and Straus1997; Al-Ghamdi et al., Reference Al-Ghamdi, Ames, Baker, Walker, Chase, Frank and Maheswaran2000) document that serotype A6 constitutes 30% of the total number of serotyped isolates. Interestingly, apart from the capsule structure, serotype A1 and A6 are extremely similar structurally (Davies and Donachie, Reference Davies and Donachie1996; Morton et al., Reference Morton, Simons and Confer1996). Serotype A2 is a common cause of pneumonic pasteurellosis in sheep (Shewen and Conlon, Reference Shewen, Conlon, Gyles and Thoen1993) but there is also an increased prevalence of serotypes A5, A6 and A7 (Ewers et al., Reference Ewers, Lubke-Becker and Wieler2004).

M. haemolytica resides in the nasopharynx (Babiuk and Acres, Reference Babiuk, Acres and Loan1984) and tonsils (Frank and Briggs, Reference Frank and Briggs1992; Frank et al., Reference Frank, Briggs and Zehr1995) of healthy calves. As a commensal organism, M. haemolytica inhabits the nasopharynx and maintains a symbiotic relationship with its host; however, key inciting events including stress of weaning, adverse weather conditions, changes in feed, transportation over long distances, mixing of cattle and infection with other microorganisms (including viruses and mycoplasma sp.) cause this benign coexistence to become a fulminating disease state (Farley, Reference Farley1932; Blood et al., Reference Blood, Radostits and Henderson1983).

Tonsillar tissue has been identified as a reservoir for M. haemolytica (Frank and Briggs, Reference Frank and Briggs1992; Frank et al., Reference Frank, Briggs and Zehr1995). Calves may be negative for M. haemolytica on culture of nasal swabs, but positive on culture of the tonsils (Frank et al., Reference Frank, Briggs, Loan, Purdy and Zehr1994). Not only does the frequency of isolation of M. haemolytica A1 increase as calves move to the feedlot, but the number of bacteria also increases rapidly (Frank, Reference Frank and Loan1984). When high numbers of M. haemolytica are present on the nasal mucosa of calves, the bacteria are inhaled into the lungs (Grey and Thomson, Reference Grey and Thomson1971). In healthy calves, lung clearance of inhaled M. haemolytica is highly efficient, with elimination of 90% of an administered dose within 4 h (Lillie and Thomson, Reference Lillie and Thomson1972) (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1. Host–bacterium–environment interactions in Mannheimia haemolytica pneumonia of cattle. (A) Homeostasis in the commensal state; (B) environmental factors tip the balance to favor lung colonization and disease; (C) intervention strategies restore homeostasis.

Several studies have attempted to understand the mechanisms associated with the switch from commensal to pathogen. Cold stress (chilling of calves with cold water) and transportation were studied for their effect on immunosuppression. Cold stress was demonstrated to transiently increase plasma cortisol levels, but had no effect on histamine or bradykinin levels (Slocombe et al., Reference Slocombe, Derksen, Robinson, Trapp, Gupta and Newman1984). Transportation was found to cause a transient elevation of plasma cortisol levels, suppressing in vitro lymphocyte blastogenesis (Filion et al., Reference Filion, Willson, Bielfeldt-Ohmamn, Babiuk and Thomson1984). Serum complement activity has also been noted to be decreased in calves that are purchased at auction and moved into the feedlot (Purdy et al., Reference Purdy, Richards and Foster1991). These alterations in immune function could impact the ability of the calf to maintain normal homeostasis with the commensal organism.

The effects of mixing of calves (during transportation, in auction barns or after sorting at the feedlot) on the prevalence of respiratory disease may result from the stresses of interacting with strange calves or may reflect increased opportunities to contact infectious agents (Jericho, Reference Jericho1979). Viral and bacterial agents break down the antimicrobial barrier of β-defensins, anionic peptides and serous and mucous secretions of the respiratory tract, allowing M. haemolytica to be released from its commensal status (Brogden et al., Reference Brogden, Lehmkuhl and Cutlip1998). Infection with bovine herpes virus 1 (BHV-1) parainfluenza virus 3 (PI-3) and bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) leads to proliferation of the bacteria in the nasopharynx, interferes with normal clearance from the lungs (Lopez et al., Reference Lopez, Thomson and Savan1976) and impairs the ciliary activity of epithelial cells in the trachea (Rossi and Kiesel, Reference Rossi and Kiesel1977). BVDV infection also leads to impaired neutrophil and lymphocyte functions (Brown et al., Reference Brown, Bolin, Frank and Roth1991) predisposing to bacterial pneumonia. Immunosuppression in the case of bovine respiratory syncytial (BRS) virus (Woldehiwet and Sharma, Reference Woldehiwet and Sharma1992) and BHV-1 diminishes the activity of T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, monocytes and macrophages (Brown and Ananaba, Reference Brown and Ananaba1988). All of these factors tend to impair innate immune defenses and can provide an opportunity for the organism to gain access to deeper structures of the respiratory tract (Ribble et al., Reference Ribble, Meek, Shewen, Guichon and Jim1995a) (Fig. 1B).

Bacterial virulence factors

Multiple products and components of M. haemolytica A1 have been proposed as virulence factors, including an adhesin (Jaramillo et al., Reference Jaramillo, Diaz, Hernandez, Debray, Trigo, Mendoza and Zenteno2000), capsular polysaccharide (Confer et al., Reference Confer, Simons, Panciera, Mort and Mosier1989; Conlon and Shewen, Reference Conlon and Shewen1993; Brogden et al., Reference Brogden, Debey, Audibert, Lehmkuhl and Chedid1995), fimbriae (Morck et al., Reference Morck, Raybould, Acres, Babiuk, Nelligan and Costerton1987, Reference Morck, Olson, Acres, Daoust and Costerton1989), iron-regulated outer membrane proteins (OMPs) (Squire et al., Reference Squire, Smiley and Croskell1984; Morck et al., Reference Morck, Ellis, Domingue, Olson and Costerton1991; Gatewood et al., Reference Gatewood, Fenwick and Chengappa1994), leukotoxin (Lkt) (Gentry et al., Reference Gentry, Confer and Panciera1985; Shewen and Wilkie, Reference Shewen and Wilkie1985, Reference Shewen and Wilkie1988), lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (Confer and Simons, Reference Confer and Simons1986), lipoproteins (Cooney and Lo, Reference Cooney and Lo1993; Nardini et al., Reference Nardini, Mellors and Lo1998), neuraminidase (Frank and Tabatabai, Reference Frank and Tabatabai1981; Straus and Purdy, Reference Straus and Purdy1994; Straus et al., Reference Straus, Purdy, Loan, Briggs and Frank1998), a serotype-specific antigen (Gonzalez-Rayos et al., Reference Gonzalez-Rayos, Lo, Shewen and Beveridge1986; Lo et al, Reference Lo, Strathdee, Shewen and Cooney1991), sialoglycoprotease (Abdullah et al., Reference Abdullah, Udoh, Shewen and Mellors1992; Lee et al., Reference Lee, Shewen, Cladman, Conlon, Mellors and Lo1994) and transferrin-binding proteins (Ogunnariwo and Schryvers, Reference Ogunnariwo and Schryvers1990; Potter et al., Reference Potter, Schryvers, Ogunnariwo, Hutchins, Lo and Watts1999). The adhesin protein, capsular polysaccharide, fimbriae, sialoglycoprotease and neuraminidase may have roles in the attachment of M. haemolytica and its colonization of cells of the respiratory tract of calves (Babiuk and Acres, Reference Babiuk, Acres and Loan1984; Morck et al., Reference Morck, Watts, Acres and Costerton1988, Reference Morck, Olson, Acres, Daoust and Costerton1989; Whiteley et al., Reference Whiteley, Maheswaran, Weiss, Ames and Kannan1992). The capsular polysaccharide also has antiphagocytic properties (Chae et al., Reference Chae, Gentry, Confer and Anderson1990) and increases directed migration of neutrophils (Czuprynski et al., Reference Czuprynski, Noel and Adlam1989). The sialoglycoprotease, by cleaving bovine IgG1, may reduce the effectiveness of opsonizing antibodies (Lee and Shewen, Reference Lee and Shewen1996). Transferrin-binding proteins and other iron-regulated proteins enable M. haemolytica to proliferate in vivo in spite of the low iron environment normally maintained by the host. LPS as an inducer of inflammation has a central role in the development of vascular lesions in lung tissue (Whiteley et al., Reference Whiteley, Maheswaran, Weiss, Ames and Kannan1992).

The virulence factor believed to be pivotal in the pathogenesis of M. haemolytica is the ruminant-specific Lkt. The effects of Lkt range from impairment of function to lysis of ruminant leukocytes (Baluyut et al., Reference Baluyut, Simonson, Bemrick and Maheswaran1981; Berggren et al., Reference Berggren, Baluyut, Simonson, Bemrick and Maheswaran1981; Shewen and Wilkie, Reference Shewen and Wilkie1982; Gentry et al., Reference Gentry, Confer and Panciera1985; Clinkenbeard et al., Reference Clinkenbeard, Mosier and Confer1989; DeBey et al., Reference DeBey, Roth, Brogden, Cutlip, Stevens, Briggs and Kluge1996). Lkt is a heat labile protein, actively secreted by all serotypes of the bacterium during the logarithmic phase of in vitro growth (Shewen and Wilkie, Reference Shewen and Wilkie1985). It is a member of the RTX (repeats in toxin) family of multidomain exotoxins (Lo, Reference Lo1990) and contains six highly conserved regions, glycine-rich nonapeptide repeats, near the C-terminal end of its structure (Lo, Reference Lo1990; Coote, Reference Coote1992; Jeyaseelan et al., Reference Jeyaseelan, Sreevatsan and Maheswaran2002). Strathdee and Lo (Reference Strathdee and Lo1987) found Lkt to be very similar genetically to Escherichia coli α-hemolysin, and Lkt has been shown to lyse sheep erythrocytes (Murphy et al., Reference Murphy, Whitworth, Clinkenbeard and Clinkenbeard1995). Like the α-hemolysin, the Lkt is encoded by four genes in the RTX toxin operon, designated C, A, B and D (Lo et al., Reference Lo, Shewen, Strathdee and Greer1985, Reference Lo, Strathdee and Shewen1987; Strathdee and Lo, Reference Strathdee and Lo1987). The A gene (lktA) codes for the structural toxin. The product of the C gene is involved in toxin activation in conjunction with an acyl carrier protein. The product of the lktA gene is biologically inactive until modified post-translationally by fatty acid acylation (Issartel et al., Reference Issartel, Koronaskis and Hughes1991). The products of B and D genes are involved in toxin secretion (Chang et al., Reference Chang, Young, Post and Struck1989; Highlander et al., Reference Highlander, Chidambaram, Engler and Weinstock1989; Strathdee and Lo, Reference Strathdee and Lo1989).

Through sequence analysis of the lkt genes and studies of polymorphism, it has been shown that different serotypes produce different Lkt types and that LktA may vary between bovine and ovine isolates of the same serotype (Davies et al., Reference Davies, Campbell and Whittam2002). Serotypes A1, A5, A6, A8, A9 and A12 have very similar Lkts (LktA1.1, LktA1.2 and LktA1.3), whereas serotype A2 isolates may express any of four Lkt types (LktA2, LktA3, LktA8 and LktA10) (Davies et al., Reference Davies, Whittam and Selander2001; Davis and Baillie, 2003). Even though these differences exist, polyclonal antibodies raised to one Lkt cross-neutralize Lkt produced by other serotypes, although antisera neutralize homologous Lkt more efficiently (Shewen and Wilkie, Reference Shewen and Wilkie1983; Lainson et al., Reference Lainson, Murray, Davis and Donachie1996). The epitope associated with neutralizing activity has been identified for M. haemolytica serotype 1 and is located at the C-terminal end of Lkt A (Lainson et al., Reference Lainson, Murray, Davis and Donachie1996).

Once the bacterium gains entry into deeper respiratory structures, Lkt plays a major role in lung injury and also in allowing bacteria to survive by evading phagocytic cell destruction. Tatum et al. (Reference Tatum, Briggs, Sreevatsan, Zehr, Hsuan, Whiteley, Ames and Maheswaran1998) generated M. haemolytica deficient in Lkt through gene knock-out. Although the mutant retained the ability to colonize the upper respiratory tract, it could not induce lung lesions. Fedorova and Highlander (Reference Fedorova and Highlander1997) created a mutant strain that secreted an antigenic proLkt that was not leukotoxic or hemolytic, confirming that the lktC gene was required for activation of proLkt to mature Lkt. Later, Highlander et al. (Reference Highlander, Fedorova, Dusek, Panciera, Alvarez and Rinehart2000) demonstrated that a strain that secretes inactive Lkt had attenuation of virulence in a calf model.

RTX toxins attach to cells through passive adsorption, which does not always lead to cell lysis, and through specific cell surface receptors. The receptor for Lkt has been identified as the transmembrane receptor CD18, the constant β-subunit of the β2-integrin family. CD18 complexed with CD11a forms the lymphocyte-function-associated antigen 1 (LFA-1), which is responsible for the high affinity adhesion of Lkt to ruminant leukocytes and platelets (Bailly et al., Reference Bailly, Tontti, Hermand, Cartron and Gahmberg1995; Gahmberg, Reference Gahmberg1997; Lally et al., Reference Lally, Kieba, Sato, Green, Rosenbloom, Korostoff, Wang, Shenker, Otrlepp, Robinson and Billings1997; Wang (JF), Reference Wang, Kieba, Korostoff, Guo, Yamaguchi, Rozmiarek, Billings, Shenker and Lally1998a; Ambagala et al., Reference Ambagala, Ambagala and Srikumaran1999; Li et al., Reference Li, Clinkenbeard and Ritchey1999; Deshpande et al., Reference Deshpande, Ambagala, Ambagala, Kehrli and Srikumaran2002; Berman et al., Reference Berman, Kozlova and Morozevich2003; Dassanayake et al., Reference Dassanayake, Maheswaran and Srikumaran2007). The repeating nanopeptide of the LktA molecule is the ligand for LFA-1 on host cells (Lally et al., Reference Lally, Hill, Kieba and Korostoff1999).

The effect of Lkt on bovine cells is dose-dependent. At very low concentrations, the toxin activates target cells triggering respiratory burst and degranulation. As the concentration of Lkt is increased, target cells are stimulated to undergo apoptosis (Lally et al., Reference Lally, Hill, Kieba and Korostoff1999). At high Lkt concentrations, necrosis of target cells occurs as a consequence of the formation of pore-like structures in the plasma membrane (Clarke et al., Reference Clarke, Confer and Mosier1998), which leads to K+ efflux and Ca2+ influx, colloidal osmotic swelling and eventual cell lysis (Orrenius et al., Reference Orrenius, Zhivotovsky and Nicotera2003). The size of the pore varies among RTX toxins; in the case of M. haemolytica Lkt, the transmembrane pore is 0.6–1.0 nm in diameter (Clinkenbeard et al., Reference Clinkenbeard, Mosier and Confer1989). Extensive in vitro studies have been successful in reproducing neutrophil necrosis utilizing purified Lkt (Wang (Z), Reference Wang, Clarke and Clinkenbeard1998b; Ambagala et al., Reference Ambagala, Ambagala and Srikumaran1999; Sun et al., Reference Sun, Clinkenbeard, Cudd, Clarke and Clinkenbeard1999, Reference Sun, Clinkenbeard, Ownby, Cudd, Clarke and Highlander2000; Jeyaseelan et al., Reference Jeyaseelan, Hsuan, Kannan, Walcheck, Wang, Kehrli, Lally, Sieck and Maheswaran2000, Reference Jeyaseelan, Kannan, Briggs, Thumbikat and Maheswaran2001; Cudd et al., Reference Cudd, Ownby, Clarke, Sun and Clinkenbeard2001; Davies and Baillie, Reference Davies and Baillie2003). At subcytolytic concentrations, Lkt enhances the inflammatory response by activating cells to produce mediators and release reactive oxygen metabolites and proteases. The lesions seen in infected lungs, including fibrinous exudate and thrombosis of lymphatic vessels, result, in part, from effects of the toxin on neutrophils (Slocombe et al., Reference Slocombe, Malark, Ingersoll, Derksen and Robinson1985; Breider et al., Reference Breider, Walker, Hopkins, Schultz and Bowersock1988) and from lysis of platelets (Clinkenbeard and Upton, Reference Clinkenbeard and Upton1991).

Another critical virulence factor is the lipid A component of the LPS of the cell wall of the organism. The lipid A fraction is responsible for endotoxic effects, such as pyrexia, macrophage activation, release of tumor necrosis factor and induction of hypotensive shock (Keiss et al., Reference Keiss, Will and Collier1964), and plays a role in the vascular lesions seen in diseased lung tissue (Whiteley et al., Reference Whiteley, Maheswaran, Weiss, Ames and Kannan1992). In addition, LPS forms complexes with Lkt, which may enhance cytotoxicity (Li and Clinkenbeard, Reference Li and Clinkenbeard1999). Although LPS has been reported to be a major antigenic determinant (Confer et al., Reference Confer, Panciera, Gentry and Fulton1986), antibody titers to LPS do not correlate with resistance to experimental pneumonia (Confer et al., Reference Confer, Simons, Panciera, Mort and Mosier1989; Mosier et al., Reference Mosier, Simons and Vestweber1995).

Lipoproteins have also been identified (Cooney and Lo, Reference Cooney and Lo1993; Nardini et al., Reference Nardini, Mellors and Lo1998) and are present in most serotypes. A surface-exposed 45-kDa OMP, designated PlpE, was sequenced and cloned by Pandher et al. (Reference Pandher, Murphy and Confer1999) . Mosier et al. (Reference Mosier, Confer and Panciera1989) reported this protein to be immunogenic in cattle and Pandher et al. (Reference Pandher, Confer and Murphy1998) found that antibodies to PlpE were associated with complement-mediated killing of M. haemolytica. A recombinant PlpE was highly immunogenic when injected subcutaneously in vaccination studies (Confer et al., Reference Confer, Ayalew, Panciera, Montelongo, Whitworth and Hammer2003). The same group demonstrated that the surface-exposed immunodominant epitope between amino acids 26 and 76 conferred protection from challenge (Ayalew et al., Reference Ayalew, Confer and Blackwood2004). A recent report from these researchers suggests that addition of recombinant PlpE to existing commercial vaccines enhances protection against experimental challenge (Confer et al., Reference Confer, Ayalew, Panciera, Montelongo and Wray2006).

Acute pulmonary infection in feedlot cattle is characterized by a fibrinosuppurative and necrotizing inflammatory response. Parenchymal necrosis is most likely caused by Lkt and LPS, as well as inflammatory factors released by neutrophils and other cells of the acute inflammatory process. Neutrophil infiltration during M. haemolytica pneumonia is associated with alveolar epithelial cell damage and necrosis. Slocombe et al. (Reference Slocombe, Malark, Ingersoll, Derksen and Robinson1985) demonstrated the contribution of neutrophils to parenchymal damage of the lung in pasteurellosis. Depletion of neutrophils prior to inoculation with the bacteria protects calves from the gross fibrinopurulent pneumonic and pleuritic lesions (Weiss et al., Reference Weiss, Bauer, Whiteley, Maheswaran and Ames1991; Ulevitch and Tobias, Reference Ulevitch and Tobias1995) but less severe changes still occur (Breider et al., Reference Breider, Walker, Hopkins, Schultz and Bowersock1988). Pathognomonic for bovine pneumonic pasteurellosis is necrosis of the alveolar epithelium due to the strong influx of neutrophils and accumulation of fibrin in the lungs. Depending on the size and distribution of the fibronecrotizing lesions, this pneumonia may result in death.

Feedlot management practices and therapeutic intervention

It has been questioned whether pneumonic pasteurellosis in feedlot calves should be considered a highly contagious disease (Thomson, Reference Thomson and Loan1984). Although morbidity rates as high as 69% have been reported in the first weeks after feedlot arrival (Kelly and Janzen, Reference Kelly and Janzen1986), it has been observed that ‘fibrinous pneumonia does not sweep through the feedlot like an epizootic but rather it centres on certain pens’ (Thomson, Reference Thomson and Loan1984). This would suggest that characteristics of the calves in the various pens rather than mere exposure to M. haemolytica are critical in determining disease outcomes. In an experimental study, 50% of non-challenged control calves (naive to M. haemolytica) in contact with animals challenged with M. haemolytica developed clinical signs of respiratory disease and responded serologically (Gibbs et al., Reference Gibbs, Allan, Wiseman and Selman1984), but it is unclear how well this reflects transmission under field conditions.

In reality, pneumonic pasteurellosis is a management disease resulting from an incompatibility between the biology of calves (and their pathogens) and the managing and/or marketing systems devised by humans. Calves that move directly from a ranch into feedlots without moving through saleyards, and without mixing with calves from other sources, have an expected morbidity of less than 5% (Radostits et al., Reference Radostits, Blood and Gay1994). While vaccines and antibiotics can be useful in controlling pneumonia, basic changes in when and how calves are weaned, sold and transported to feedlots would have a profound impact on the prevalence of disease.

Antibiotics

Injectable antibiotics are employed extensively in the feedlot industry in North America in attempts to prevent and treat bovine respiratory disease. Antibiotics are rarely selected on the basis of in vitro sensitivity of isolates from nasal or pharyngeal swabs. Isolates from these sources do not accurately reflect organisms present in the lower respiratory tract of the same animal (Allen et al., Reference Allen, Viel, Bateman, Rosendal, Shewen and Physick-Sheard1991). Necropsy specimens from antibiotic-treated calves also do not provide reliable information as to the antibiotic sensitivities of the organisms initiating the pneumonia. Most published studies examining the efficacy of antibiotics against disease in feedlots make no attempt to distinguish pneumonic pasteurellosis from respiratory conditions caused by other bacteria or by viruses (Mechor et al., Reference Mechor, Jim and Janzen1988; Libersa et al., Reference Libersa, Van Huffel and Madelenat1995; Vogel et al., Reference Vogel, Laudert, Zimmermann, Guthrie, Mechor and Moore1998). The term ‘undifferentiated fever’ has been considered synonymous with ‘bovine respiratory disease complex’ by some workers (Jim et al., Reference Jim, Booker, Guichon, Schunicht, Wildman, Johnson and Lockwood1999; Booker et al., Reference Booker, Abutarbush, Schunicht, Jim, Perrett, Wildman, Guichon, Pittman, Jones and Pollock2007; Schunicht et al., Reference Schunicht, Booker, Guichon, Jim, Wildman, Pitman and Perrett2007). Thus a succession of antimicrobial drugs have been examined for efficacy against undifferentiated respiratory disease under field conditions, including penicillin (Mechor et al., Reference Mechor, Jim and Janzen1988; Bateman et al., Reference Bateman, Martin, Shewen and Menzies1990), oxytetracycline (Mechor et al., Reference Mechor, Jim and Janzen1988; Bateman et al., Reference Bateman, Martin, Shewen and Menzies1990; Harland et al., Reference Harland, Jim, Guichon, Townsend and Janzen1991), trimethoprim/sulfadoxine (Mechor et al., Reference Mechor, Jim and Janzen1988; Bateman et al., Reference Bateman, Martin, Shewen and Menzies1990; Harland et al., Reference Harland, Jim, Guichon, Townsend and Janzen1991), ampicillin (Bentley and Cummins, Reference Bentley and Cummins1987; Libersa et al., Reference Libersa, Van Huffel and Madelenat1995), tilmicosin (Gorham et al., Reference Gorham, Carroll, McAskill, Watkins, Ose, Tonkinson and Merrill1990; Schumann et al., Reference Schumann, Janzen and McKinnon1990; Hoar et al., Reference Hoar, Jelinski, Ribble, Janzen and Johnson1998), florfenicol (Libersa et al., Reference Libersa, Van Huffel and Madelenat1995; Hoar et al., Reference Hoar, Jelinski, Ribble, Janzen and Johnson1998; Jim et al., Reference Jim, Booker, Guichon, Schunicht, Wildman, Johnson and Lockwood1999) and tulathromycin (Booker et al., Reference Booker, Abutarbush, Schunicht, Jim, Perrett, Wildman, Guichon, Pittman, Jones and Pollock2007; Schunicht et al., Reference Schunicht, Booker, Guichon, Jim, Wildman, Pitman and Perrett2007; Wellman and O'Connor, Reference Wellman and O'Connor2007). Although all of these antimicrobials have been efficacious for treatment of bovine respiratory disease, many isolates of M. haemolytica are now resistant to penicillin, ampicillin, tetracycline, sulfonamides and tilmicosin (Bateman, Reference Bateman, Prescott and Baggot1993; Watts et al., Reference Watts, Yancey, Salmon and Case1994; Apley, Reference Apley1997; Welsh et al., Reference Welsh, Dye, Payton and Confer2004). Penicillin and oxytetracycline have been used at higher dosage rates than recommended by the manufacturers in attempts to improve efficacy without resorting to the use of more expensive antibiotics (Bateman, Reference Bateman, Prescott and Baggot1993), prompting concerns about antibiotic residues in meat (Mechor et al., Reference Mechor, Jim and Janzen1988). The use of antibiotics at dosage rates, or by routes, or in species not approved by governmental agencies, has led to legislation in the USA to curtail ‘extra-label’ use of antibiotics in food-producing animals (Apley, Reference Apley1997). The availability of ceftiofur (1988), tilmicosin (1992), florfenicol (1996) and most recently tulathromycin (2005) for use in cattle has provided several drugs efficacious at label dosage rates against bovine respiratory pathogens (Bateman, Reference Bateman, Prescott and Baggot1993; Apley, Reference Apley1997; Hoar et al., Reference Hoar, Jelinski, Ribble, Janzen and Johnson1998; Jim et al., Reference Jim, Booker, Guichon, Schunicht, Wildman, Johnson and Lockwood1999; Schunicht et al., Reference Schunicht, Booker, Guichon, Jim, Wildman, Pitman and Perrett2007), at least for the time being. Current use of antibiotics in treatment of bovine respiratory disease has been reviewed (Apley, Reference Apley, Howard and Smith1999). Product formulations providing sustained blood levels of antibiotics for 48–72 h or more [oxytetracyclines (Bateman, Reference Bateman, Prescott and Baggot1993), experimental sustained release ceftiofur (Kesler and Bechtol, Reference Kesler and Bechtol1999) and high-dose florfenicol (Varma et al., Reference Varma, Lockwood, Cosgrove and Rogers1998)] are especially valued for use in feedlots as a means of reducing handling and treatment stresses of sick animals and of minimizing labor costs.

In a meta-analysis of 107 field trials of prophylactic mass medication of feedlot cattle, it was concluded that the parenteral administration of tilmicosin or long-acting oxytetracycline preparations on arrival was associated with significant reductions in morbidity (Van Donkersgoed, Reference Van Donkersgoed1992). Available data were considered inadequate to judge the efficacy of mass medication administered in water or feed. Another meta-analysis of 14 field trials found that treatment of bovine respiratory disease with tulathromycin was associated with approximately 50% reduction in the risk of re-treatment compared to treatment with tilomicosin (Wellman and O'Connor, Reference Wellman and O'Connor2007). Several investigators have promoted the concept of ‘metaphylactic’ (Young, Reference Young1995; Jim et al., Reference Jim, Booker, Guichon, Schunicht, Wildman, Johnson and Lockwood1999) use of parenteral antibiotics, meaning the use of mass medication at therapeutic doses before overt signs of disease are evident (Vogel et al., Reference Vogel, Laudert, Zimmermann, Guthrie, Mechor and Moore1998, Booker et al., Reference Booker, Abutarbush, Schunicht, Jim, Perrett, Wildman, Guichon, Pittman, Jones and Pollock2007). A single dose (most commonly oxytetracycline, tilmicosin or tulathromycin) is administered to all calves on arrival, or at some later time point chosen on the basis of observed signs of disease in a minority of animals or on the basis of historical patterns of disease. This practice is considered standard procedure in some parts of North America (Jim et al., Reference Jim, Booker, Guichon, Schunicht, Wildman, Johnson and Lockwood1999). With current concerns about the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria through excessive agricultural use of antibiotics, antibiotic residues in food products, and animal welfare, it is imperative that efficacious means that are not antibiotic-dependent be developed to prevent pneumonic pasteurellosis.

Vaccines

Vaccines intended for prevention of respiratory disease in feedlot cattle have been manufactured for over a century (Mosier et al., Reference Mosier, Confer and Panciera1989). Commercial vaccines available in Canada (Bowland and Shewen, Reference Bowland and Shewen2000) and the USA (Hjerpe, Reference Hjerpe1990) for prevention of bovine respiratory disease have been reviewed. Evaluation of vaccine efficacy in beef calves involves considerable difficulties (Martin, Reference Martin1989; Ribble, Reference Ribble1989), in part because of difficulties in defining objective outcome measures (Ribble, Reference Ribble1989), in part because of difficulties in achieving adequate group sizes to obtain acceptable statistical power (Wilson, Reference Wilson1989), and in part because of the unpredictability of morbidity and mortality rates from year to year (Van Donkersgoed et al., Reference Van Donkersgoed, Potter, Mollinson and Harland1994; Ribble et al., Reference Ribble, Meek, Jim and Guichon1995b). It is considered that a single field trial is inadequate to assess the economic impact of a particular vaccine on respiratory disease in feedlots (Wilson, Reference Wilson1989).

Early bacterins were prepared from cultures of Bacillus boviseptica (which has since been divided into the species M. haemolytica and Pasteurella multocida). Following field trials, their efficacy was questioned (Miller et al., Reference Miller, Howard, Bayard, Smith, Stanard, Jones, Hilton, Killham and Truam1927) or they were found to have detrimental effects (Farley, Reference Farley1932). More recently, bacterins prepared from M. haemolytica have been reported to have no clear beneficial effect (Hamdy et al., Reference Hamdy, King and Trapp1965; Martin, Reference Martin1983) or to have detrimental effects (Schipper and Kelling, Reference Schipper and Kelling1971; Friend et al., Reference Friend, Wilkie, Thomson and Barnum1977; Wilkie et al., Reference Wilkie, Markham and Shewen1980). Live M. haemolytica vaccines have been investigated (Mosier et al., Reference Mosier, Confer and Panciera1989; Babiuk and Campos, Reference Babiuk, Campos and Peters1993) and marketed (Hjerpe, Reference Hjerpe1990), but protection studies have yielded variable results (Smith et al., Reference Smith, Davidson and Henry1985; Purdy et al., Reference Purdy, Livingston and Frank1986; Mosier et al., Reference Mosier, Panciera, Rogers, Uhlich, Butine, Confer and Basaraba1998). Use of antibiotics in cattle vaccinated with live M. haemolytica (within 7 days after or 3 days before vaccination) is not recommended, due to inhibitory effects on replication of vaccine organisms (Hjerpe, Reference Hjerpe1990). The widespread use of antibiotics in calves at feedlot arrival makes the use of live bacterial vaccines impractical.

Identification of the importance of the Lkt, produced during logarithmic phase growth, in the pathogenesis of pneumonic pasteurellosis (Shewen and Wilkie, Reference Shewen and Wilkie1982, Reference Shewen and Wilkie1985; Gentry et al., Reference Gentry, Confer and Panciera1985) led to the development of a commercial, cell-free, M. haemolytica A1 culture supernatant vaccine (Shewen and Wilkie, Reference Shewen and Wilkie1988; Shewen et al., Reference Shewen, Sharp and Wilkie1988). In experimental trials using two doses of vaccine at an interval of 21 days, efficacy against moderate to severe pneumonia ranged from 60 to 70% (Shewen et al., Reference Shewen, Sharp and Wilkie1988). Results from field trials were variable (Bateman, Reference Bateman1988; Jim et al., Reference Jim, Guichon and Shaw1988; Thorlakson et al., Reference Thorlakson, Martin and Peters1990). Numerous other antigens of M. haemolytica have been documented in logarithmic phase culture supernatant, including surface antigens involved in agglutination reactions (Shewen and Wilkie, Reference Shewen and Wilkie1988), capsular polysaccharide (Conlon and Shewen, Reference Conlon and Shewen1993), lipoproteins (Cooney and Lo, Reference Cooney and Lo1993) and sialoglycoprotease (Abdullah et al., Reference Abdullah, Udoh, Shewen and Mellors1992), and these antigens may contribute to vaccine efficacy.

Since this initial M. haemolytica subunit vaccine, various companies have introduced other subunit or subunit-enriched vaccines consisting of outer membrane extracts (Srinand et al., Reference Srinand, Hsuan, Yoo, Maheswaran, Ames and Werdin1996), or extracted antigens enriched with recombinant Lkt (Babiuk and Campos, Reference Babiuk, Campos and Peters1993; Van Donkersgoed et al., Reference Van Donkersgoed, Schumann, Harland, Potter and Janzen1993b, Reference Van Donkersgoed, Potter, Mollinson and Harland1994, Reference Van Donkersgoed, Guenther, Evans, Potter and Harland1995), or bacterins with added culture supernatant antigens (Babiuk and Campos, Reference Babiuk, Campos and Peters1993; Srinand et al., Reference Srinand, Hsuan, Yoo, Maheswaran, Ames and Werdin1996). Most recently (1999), a vaccine based on antigens expressed under iron-limiting conditions has been licensed (Gilmour et al., Reference Gilmour, Donachie, Sutherland, Gilmour, Jones and Quirie1991; Donachie, Reference Donachie1999). Serological responses to selected commercial M. haemolytica vaccines have been compared (Srinand et al., Reference Srinand, Hsuan, Yoo, Maheswaran, Ames and Werdin1996; Confer et al., Reference Confer, Fulton, Clinkenbeard and Driskell1998).

Recent studies have focused on the induction of immunity to M. haemolytica by mucosal delivery of antigen. Induction of local immunity in the nasopharynx could reduce colonization by Pasteurella spp. Viral vectors (replicating in the upper respiratory tract) expressing antigens of M. haemolytica (Babiuk and Campos, Reference Babiuk, Campos and Peters1993), oral administration of M. haemolytica antigens encapsulated in alginate microspheres (Bowersock et al., Reference Bowersock, Hogenesch, Suckow, Guimond, Martin, Borie, Torregrosa, Park and Park1999) and oral administration of modified live M. haemolytica are under consideration (Briggs and Tatum, Reference Briggs and Tatum1999). Researchers have also engineered plants for expression of M. haemolytica antigens, with the ultimate aim of producing a transgenic edible vaccine (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Strommer, Hodgins, Shewen, Niu and Lo2001)

Conclusion

Given the complex etiology of respiratory disease attributed to M. haemolytica, it is unlikely that any single strategy will be completely effective in preventing disease. A combination of more definitive diagnostic methods, more efficacious vaccines, improved therapeutic agents and more rational management practices will be needed (Fig. 1C) and the search for solutions is likely to involve veterinary researchers for some time to come.

References

Abdullah, KM, Udoh, EA, Shewen, PE and Mellors, A (1992). A neutral glycoprotease of Pasteurella haemolytica A1 specifically cleaves O-sialoglycoproteins. Infection and Immunity 60: 5662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Ghamdi, GM, Ames, TR, Baker, JC, Walker, R, Chase, CC, Frank, GH and Maheswaran, SK (2000). Serotyping of Mannheimia haemolytica isolates from the upper Midwest United States. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 12: 576578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allan, EM, Wiseman, A, Gibbs, HA and Selman, IE (1985). Pasteurella species isolated from bovine respiratory tract and their antimicrobial sensitivity patterns. Veterinary Record 117: 629631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, JW, Viel, L, Bateman, KG, Rosendal, S, Shewen, PE and Physick-Sheard, P (1991). The microbial flora of the respiratory tract in feedlot calves: associations between nasopharyngeal and bronchoalveolar lavage cultures. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 55: 341346.Google ScholarPubMed
Ambagala, TC, Ambagala, AP and Srikumaran, S (1999). The leukotoxin of Pasteurella haemolytica binds to beta(2) integrins on bovine leukocytes. FEMS Microbiology Letters 179: 1667.Google ScholarPubMed
Ames, TR (1997). Dairy calf pneumonia: the disease and its impact. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 13: 379391.Google ScholarPubMed
Angen, O, Mutters, R, Caugant, DA, Olsen, JE and Bisgaard, M (1999a). Taxonomic relationships of the [Pasteurella] haemolytica complex as evaluated by DNA–DNA hybridizations and 16S rRNA sequencing with proposal of Mannheimia haemolytica gen. nov., comb. nov., Mannheimia granulomatis comb. nov., Mannheimia glucosida sp. nov., Mannheimia ruminalis sp. nov. and Mannheimia varigena sp. nov. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 49: 6786.Google ScholarPubMed
Angen, O, Quirie, M, Donachie, W and Bisgaard, M (1999b). Investigations on the species specificity of Mannheimia (Pasteurella) haemolytica serotyping. Veterinary Microbiology 65: 283290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Apley, M (1997). Antimicrobial therapy of bovine respiratory disease. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 13: 549574.Google ScholarPubMed
Apley, M (1999). Respiratory disease therapeutics. In: Howard, LJ and Smith, RA (eds) Current Veterinary Therapy – Food Animal Practice. 4th edn.Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders.Google Scholar
Ayalew, S, Confer, AW and Blackwood, ER (2004). Characterization of immunodominant and potentially protective epitopes of Mannheimia haemolytica serotype 1 outer membrane lipoprotein PlpE. Infection and Immunity 72: 72657274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Babiuk, LA and Acres, SD (1984). Models for bovine respiratory disease. In: Loan, RW (ed.) Bovine Respiratory Disease, Proceedings of the North American Symposium on Bovine Respiratory Disease. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Babiuk, LA and Campos, M (1993). Respiratory vaccines for farm animals. In: Peters, AR (ed.) Vaccines for Veterinary Applications. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 83115.Google Scholar
Bailly, P, Tontti, E, Hermand, P, Cartron, JP and Gahmberg, CG (1995). The red cell LW blood group protein is an intercellular adhesion molecule, which binds to CD11/CD18 leukocyte integrins. European Journal of Immunology 25: 33163320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baluyut, CS, Simonson, RR, Bemrick, WJ and Maheswaran, SK (1981). Interaction of Pasteurella haemolytica with bovine neutrophils: identification and partial characterization of a cytotoxin. American Journal of Veterinary Research 42: 19201926.Google ScholarPubMed
Bateman, KG (1988). Efficacy of a Pasteurella haemolytica vaccine/bacterial extract in the prevention of bovine respiratory disease in recently shipped feedlot calves. Canadian Veterinary Journal 29: 838839.Google ScholarPubMed
Bateman, KG (1993). Antimicrobial drug use in cattle. In: Prescott, JF and Baggot, JD (eds) Antimicrobial Therapy in Veterinary Medicine, 2nd edn. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, pp. 456468.Google Scholar
Bateman, KG, Martin, SW, Shewen, PE and Menzies, PI (1990). An evaluation of antimicrobial therapy for undifferentiated bovine respiratory disease. Canadian Veterinary Journal 31: 689697.Google ScholarPubMed
Bentley, OE and Cummins, JM (1987). Efficacy of sulbactam, a betalactamase inhibitor, combined with ampicillin, in the therapy of ampicillin-resistant pneumonic pasteurellosis in feedlot calves. Canadian Veterinary Journal 28: 591594.Google Scholar
Berggren, KA, Baluyut, CS, Simonson, RR, Bemrick, WJ and Maheswaran, SK (1981). Cytotoxic effects of Pasteurella haemolytica on bovine neutrophils. American Journal of Veterinary Research 42: 13831388.Google ScholarPubMed
Berman, AE, Kozlova, NI and Morozevich, GE (2003). Integrins: structure and signaling. Biochemistry (Moscow) 68: 12841299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biberstein, EL (1978). Biotyping and serotyping Pasteurella haemolytica. In: Bergan, T and Norris, JR (eds) Methods in Microbiology. London: Academic Press, pp. 253269.Google Scholar
Bingham, DP, Moore, R and Richards, AB (1990). Comparison of DNA:DNA homology and enzymatic activity between Pasteurella haemolytica and related species. American Journal of Veterinary Research 51: 11611166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackall, PJ, Bojesen, AM, Christensen, H and Bisgaard, M (2007). Reclassification of [Pasteurella] trehalosi as Bibersteinia trehalosi gen. nov., comb. nov. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 5: 666674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blood, DC, Radostits, OM and Henderson, JA (1983). Veterinary Medicine, 6th edn.London: Bailliere-Tindall.Google Scholar
Booker, CW, Abutarbush, SM, Schunicht, OC, Jim, GK, Perrett, T, Wildman, BK, Guichon, PT, Pittman, TJ, Jones, C and Pollock, CM (2007) Evaluation of the efficacy of tulathromycin as a metaphylactic antimicrobial in feedlot calves. Veterinary Therapeutics 8: 183200.Google ScholarPubMed
Bowersock, TL, Hogenesch, H, Suckow, M, Guimond, P, Martin, S, Borie, D, Torregrosa, S, Park, H and Park, K (1999). Oral vaccination of animals with antigens encapsulated in alginate microspheres. Vaccine 17: 18041811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowland, SL and Shewen, PE (2000). Bovine respiratory disease: commercial vaccines currently available in Canada. Canadian Veterinary Journal 41: 3348.Google ScholarPubMed
Breider, MA, Walker, RD, Hopkins, FM, Schultz, TW and Bowersock, TL (1988). Pulmonary lesions induced by Pasteurella haemolytica in neutrophil sufficient and neutrophil deficient calves. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 52: 205209.Google ScholarPubMed
Briggs, RE and Tatum, FM (1999). New mucosal vaccine in beef cattle imparts rapid resistance to pneumonic pasteurellosis after mass-medicating on feed. Presented at the Annual Meeting of United States Animal Health Association, San Diego, CA. www.usaha.orgGoogle Scholar
Brogden, KA, Debey, B, Audibert, F, Lehmkuhl, H and Chedid, L (1995). Protection of ruminants by Pasteurella haemolytica A1 capsular polysaccharide vaccines containing muramyl dipeptide analogs. Vaccine 13: 16771684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brogden, KA, Lehmkuhl, HD and Cutlip, RC (1998). Pasteurella haemolytica complicated respiratory infections in sheep and goats. Veterinary Research 29: 233254.Google ScholarPubMed
Brown, GB, Bolin, SR, Frank, DE and Roth, JA (1991). Defective function of leukocytes from cattle persistently infected with bovine viral diarrhea virus, and the influence of recombinant cytokines. American Journal of Veterinary Research 52: 381387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
JrBrown, TT and Ananaba, G (1988). Effect of respiratory infections caused by bovine herpesvirus-1 or parainfluenza-3 virus on bovine alveolar macrophage functions. American Journal of Veterinary Research 49: 14471451.Google ScholarPubMed
Carter, GR, Chengappa, MM and Roberts, AW (1995). Essentials of Veterinary Microbiology. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, pp. 171179.Google Scholar
Chae, CH, Gentry, MJ, Confer, AW and Anderson, GA (1990). Resistance to host immune defense mechanisms afforded by capsular material of Pasteurella haemolytica, serotype 1. Veterinary Microbiology 25: 241251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, Y, Young, R, Post, D and Struck, DK (1989). Identification and characterization of the Pasteurella haemolytica leukotoxin. Infection and Immunity 55: 23482354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, CR, Confer, AW and Mosier, DA (1998). In vivo effect of Pasteurella haemolytica infection on bovine neutrophil morphology. American Journal of Veterinary Research 59: 588592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clinkenbeard, KD and Upton, ML (1991). Lysis of bovine platelets by Pasteurella haemolytica leukotoxin. American Journal of Veterinary Research 52: 453457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clinkenbeard, KD, Mosier, DA and Confer, AW (1989). Transmembrane pore size and role of cell swelling in cytotoxicity caused by Pasteurella haemolytica leukotoxin. Infection and Immunity 57: 420425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Confer, AW and Simons, KR (1986). Effects of Pasteurella haemolytica lipopolysaccharide on selected functions of bovine leukocytes. American Journal of Veterinary Research 47: 154157.Google ScholarPubMed
Confer, AW, Panciera, RJ, Gentry, MJ and Fulton, RW (1986). Serum antibodies against Pasteurella haemolytica lipopolysaccharide: relationship to experimental bovine pneumonic pasteurellosis. American Journal of Veterinary Research 47: 11341138.Google ScholarPubMed
Confer, AW, Simons, KR, Panciera, RJ, Mort, AJ and Mosier, DA (1989). Serum antibody response to carbohydrate antigens of Pasteurella haemolytica serotype 1: relation to experimentally induced bovine pneumonic pasteurellosis. American Journal of Veterinary Research 50: 98105.Google ScholarPubMed
Confer, AW, Fulton, RW, Clinkenbeard, KD and Driskell, BA (1998). Duration of serum antibody responses following vaccination and revaccination of cattle with non-living commercial Pasteurella haemolytica vaccines. Vaccine 16: 19621970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Confer, AW, Ayalew, S, Panciera, RJ, Montelongo, M, Whitworth, LC and Hammer, JD (2003). Immunogenicity of recombinant Mannheimia haemolytica serotype 1 outer membrane protein PlpE and augmentation of a commercial vaccine. Vaccine 21: 28212829.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Confer, AW, Ayalew, S, Panciera, RJ, Montelongo, M and Wray, JH (2006). Recombinant Mannheimia haemolytica serotype 1 outer membrane protein PlpE enhances commercial M. haemolytica vaccine-induced resistance against serotype 6 challenge. Vaccine 24: 22482255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conlon, JA and Shewen, PE (1993). Clinical and serological evaluation of a Pasteurella haemolytica A1 capsular polysaccharide vaccine. Vaccine 11: 767772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooney, BJ and Lo, RY (1993). Three contiguous lipoprotein genes in Pasteurella haemolytica A1 which are homologous to a lipoprotein gene in Haemophilus influenzae type b. Infection and Immunity 61: 46824688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coote, JG (1992). Structural and functional relationships among the RTX toxin determinants of gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 8: 137161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cudd, LA, Ownby, CL, Clarke, CR, Sun, Y and Clinkenbeard, KD (2001). Effects of Mannheimia haemolytica leukotoxin on apoptosis and oncosis of bovine neutrophils. American Journal of Veterinary Research 62: 136141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Czuprynski, CJ, Noel, EF and Adlam, C (1989). Modulation of bovine neutrophil antibacterial activities by Pasteurella haemolytica A1 purified capsular polysaccharide. Microbial Pathogenesis 6: 133141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dassanayake, RP, Maheswaran, SK and Srikumaran, S (2007). Monomeric expression of bovine beta2-integrin subunits reveals their role in Mannheimia haemolytica leukotoxin-induced biological effects. Infection and Immunity 75: 50045010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, RL and Donachie, W (1996). Intra-specific diversity and host specificity within Pasteurella haemolytica based on variation of capsular polysaccharide, lipopolysaccharide and outer-membrane proteins. Microbiology 142: 18951907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, RL and Baillie, S (2003). Cytotoxic activity of Mannheimia haemolytica strains in relation to diversity of the leukotoxin structural gene lktA. Veterinary Microbiology 92: 263279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, RL, Whittam, TS and Selander, RK (2001). Sequence diversity and molecular evolution of the leukotoxin (lktA) gene in bovine and ovine strains of Mannheimia (Pasteurella) haemolytica. Journal of Bacteriology 183: 13941404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, RL, Campbell, S and Whittam, TS (2002). Mosaic structure and molecular evolution of the leukotoxin operon (lktCABD) in Mannheimia (Pasteurella) haemolytica, Mannheimia glucosida, and Pasteurella trehalosi. Journal of Bacteriology 184: 266277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeBey, BM, Roth, JA, Brogden, KA, Cutlip, RC, Stevens, MG, Briggs, RE and Kluge, JP (1996). In vitro lymphocyte responses and gamma-interferon production as measures of cell-mediated immunity of cattle exposed to Pasteurella haemolytica. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 60: 263270.Google ScholarPubMed
Deshpande, MS, Ambagala, TC, Ambagala, AP, JrKehrli, ME and Srikumaran, S (2002). Bovine CD18 is necessary and sufficient to mediate Mannheimia (Pasteurella) haemolytica leukotoxin-induced cytolysis. Infection and Immunity 70: 50585064.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donachie, W (1999). Cattle pasteurellosis vaccine. Moredun Research Institute Annual Report for 1999, p. 10. www.moredun.org.ukGoogle Scholar
Ewers, C, Lubke-Becker, A and Wieler, LH (2004). Mannheimia haemolytica and the pathogenesis of enzootic bronchopneumonia. Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 117: 97115.Google ScholarPubMed
Farley, H (1932). An epizoological study of shipping fever in Kansas. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 52: 165172.Google Scholar
Fedorova, ND and Highlander, SK (1997). Generation of targeted nonpolar gene insertions and operon fusions in Pasteurella haemolytica and creation of a strain that produces and secretes inactive leukotoxin. Infection and Immunity 65: 25932598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filion, LG, Willson, PJ, Bielfeldt-Ohmamn, H, Babiuk, LA and Thomson, RG (1984). The possible role of stress in the induction of pneumonic pasteurellosis. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine 48: 268274.Google ScholarPubMed
Frank, GH (1984). Bacteria as etiologic agents in bovine respiratory disease. In: Loan, RW (ed.) Bovine Respiratory Disease. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, GH (1989). Pasteurellosis of cattle. In: Adlam, C and Rutter, JM (eds) Pasteurella and Pasteurellosis. London: Academic Press, pp. 197222.Google Scholar
Frank, GH and Briggs, RE (1992). Colonization of the tonsils of calves with Pasteurella haemolytica. American Journal of Veterinary Research 53: 481484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, GH and Smith, PC (1983). Prevalence of Pasteurella haemolytica in transported calves. American Journal of Veterinary Research 44: 981985.Google ScholarPubMed
Frank, GH and Tabatabai, LB (1981). Neuraminidase activity of Pasteurella haemolytica isolates. Infection and Immunity 32: 11191122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, GH, Briggs, RE, Loan, RW, Purdy, CW and Zehr, ES (1994). Serotype-specific inhibition of colonization of the tonsils and nasopharynx of calves with Pasteurella haemolytica serotype A1 after vaccination with the organism. American Journal of Veterinary Research 55: 11071110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, GH, Briggs, RE and Zehr, ES (1995). Colonization of the tonsils and nasopharynx of calves by rifampicin-resistant Pasteurella haemolytica and its inhibition by vaccination. American Journal of Veterinary Research 56: 866869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friend, SC, Wilkie, BN, Thomson, RG and Barnum, DA (1977). Bovine pneumonic pasteurellosis: experimental induction in vaccinated and nonvaccinated calves. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine 41: 7783.Google ScholarPubMed
Gahmberg, CG (1997). Leukocyte adhesion: CD11/CD18 integrins and intercellular adhesion molecules. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 9: 643650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gatewood, DM, Fenwick, BW and Chengappa, MM (1994). Growth-condition dependent expression of Pasteurella haemolytica A1 outer membrane proteins, capsule, and leukotoxin. Veterinary Microbiology 41: 221233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentry, MJ, Confer, AW and Panciera, RJ (1985). Serum neutralization of cytotoxin from Pasteurella haemolytica, serotype 1 and resistance to experimental bovine pneumonic pasteurellosis. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 9: 239250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbs, HA, Allan, EM, Wiseman, A and Selman, IE (1984). Experimental production of bovine pneumonic pasteurellosis. Research in Veterinary Science 37: 154166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilmour, NJ, Donachie, W, Sutherland, AD, Gilmour, JS, Jones, GE and Quirie, M (1991). Vaccine containing iron-regulated proteins of Pasteurella haemolytica A2 enhances protection against experimental pasteurellosis in lambs. Vaccine 9: 137140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gorham, PE, Carroll, LH, McAskill, JW, Watkins, LE, Ose, EE, Tonkinson, LV and Merrill, JK (1990). Tilmicosin as a single injection treatment for respiratory disease of feedlot cattle. Canadian Veterinary Journal 31: 826829.Google ScholarPubMed
Grey, CL and Thomson, RG (1971). Pasteurella haemolytica in the tracheal air of calves. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine 35: 121128.Google ScholarPubMed
Gonzalez-Rayos, C, Lo, RY, Shewen, PE and Beveridge, TJ (1986). Cloning of a serotype-specific antigen from Pasteurella haemolytica A1. Infection and Immunity 53: 505510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamdy, AH, King, NB and Trapp, AL (1965). Attempted immunization of cattle against shipping fever: a field trial. American Journal of Veterinary Research 26: 897902.Google Scholar
Harland, RJ, Jim, GK, Guichon, PT, Townsend, HGG and Janzen, ED (1991). Efficacy of parenteral antibiotics for disease prophylaxis in feedlot calves. Canadian Veterinary Journal 32: 163168.Google ScholarPubMed
Highlander, SK, Chidambaram, M, Engler, MJ and Weinstock, GM (1989). DNA sequence of the Pasteurella haemolytica leukotoxin gene cluster. DNA 8: 1528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Highlander, SK, Fedorova, ND, Dusek, DM, Panciera, R, Alvarez, LE and Rinehart, C (2000). Inactivation of Pasteurella (Mannheimia) haemolytica leukotoxin causes partial attenuation of virulence in a calf challenge model. Infection and Immunity 68: 39163922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsh, DC and Zee, YC (1999). Veterinary Microbiology. Boston, MA: Blackwell Scientific Publications, pp. 135140.Google Scholar
Hjerpe, CA (1990). Bovine vaccines and herd vaccination programs. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 6: 171260.Google ScholarPubMed
Hoar, BR, Jelinski, MD, Ribble, CS, Janzen, ED and Johnson, JC (1998). A comparison of the clinical field efficacy and safety of florfenicol and tilmicosin for the treatment of undifferentiated bovine respiratory disease of cattle in western Canada. Canadian Veterinary Journal 39: 161166.Google ScholarPubMed
Issartel, JP, Koronaskis, V and Hughes, C (1991). Activation of Escherichia coli prohaemolysin to the mature toxin by acyl carrier protein-dependent fatty acylation. Nature 351: 759761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaramillo, L, Diaz, F, Hernandez, P, Debray, H, Trigo, F, Mendoza, G and Zenteno, E (2000). Purification and characterization of an adhesin from Pasteurella haemolytica. Glycobiology 10: 3137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jericho, KWF (1979). Update on pasteurellosis in young cattle. Canadian Veterinary Journal 20: 333335.Google ScholarPubMed
Jeyaseelan, S, Hsuan, SL, Kannan, MS, Walcheck, B, Wang, JF, Kehrli, ME, Lally, ET, Sieck, GC and Maheswaran, SK (2000). Lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 is a receptor for Pasteurella haemolytica leukotoxin in bovine leukocytes. Infection and Immunity 68: 7279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeyaseelan, S, Kannan, MS, Briggs, RE, Thumbikat, P and Maheswaran, SK (2001). Mannheimia haemolytica leukotoxin activates a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase signaling cascade in bovine leukocytes, which induces biological effects. Infection and Immunity 69: 61316139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeyaseelan, S, Sreevatsan, S and Maheswaran, SK (2002). Role of Mannheimia haemolytica leukotoxin in the pathogenesis of bovine pneumonic pasteurellosis. Animal Health Research Reviews 3: 6982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jim, GK, Booker, CW, Guichon, PT, Schunicht, OC, Wildman, BK, Johnson, JC and Lockwood, PW (1999). A comparison of florfenicol and tilmicosin for the treatment of undifferentiated fever in feedlot calves in western Canada. Canadian Veterinary Journal 40: 179184.Google ScholarPubMed
Jim, K, Guichon, T and Shaw, G (1988). Protecting calves from pneumonic pasteurellosis. Veterinary Medicine 83: 10841087.Google Scholar
Jubb, KVF and Kennedy, PC (1970). Pathology of Domestic Animals, 2nd edn.New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Keiss, RE, Will, DH and Collier, JR (1964). Skin toxicity and hemodynamic properties of endotoxin derived from Pasteurella haemolytica. American Journal of Veterinary Research 25: 935941.Google Scholar
Kelly, AP and Janzen, ED (1986). A review of morbidity and mortality rates and disease occurrence in North American feedlot cattle. Canadian Veterinary Journal 27: 496500.Google ScholarPubMed
Kesler, DJ and Bechtol, DT (1999). Efficacy of sustained release needle-less ceftiofur sodium implants in treating calves with bovine respiratory disease. Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin [B] 46: 2535.Google ScholarPubMed
Kiorpes, AL, Butler, DG, Dubielzig, RR and Beck, KA (1988). Enzootic pneumonia in calves: clinical and morphological features. Compendium for the Continuing Education of the Practicing Veterinarian 10: 248260.Google Scholar
Kitt, T (1885). Uber eine experimentelle de Rinderseuche ahnliche Infektionskrankheit. Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft für Morphologie und Physiologic in München. pp. 140168.Google Scholar
Lainson, FA, Murray, J, Davis, RC and Donachie, W (1996). Characterization of epitopes involved in the neutralization of Pasteurella haemolytica serotype A1 leukotoxin. Microbiology 142: 24992507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lally, ET, Kieba, IR, Sato, A, Green, C, Rosenbloom, J, Korostoff, J, Wang, JF, Shenker, BJ, Otrlepp, S, Robinson, MK and Billings, PC (1997). RTX toxins recognize a beta2 integrin on the surface of human target cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry 272: 3046330469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lally, ET, Hill, RB, Kieba, IR and Korostoff, J (1999). The interaction between RTX toxins and target cells. Trends in Microbiology 7: 356361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, CW and Shewen, PE (1996). Evidence of bovine immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) protease activity in partially purified culture supernate of Pasteurella haemolytica A1. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 60: 127132.Google ScholarPubMed
Lee, CW, Shewen, PE, Cladman, WM, Conlon, JA, Mellors, A and Lo, RY (1994). Sialoglycoprotease of Pasteurella haemolytica A1: detection of antisialoglycoprotease antibodies in sera of calves. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 58: 9398.Google ScholarPubMed
Lee, RW, Strommer, J, Hodgins, D, Shewen, PE, Niu, Y and Lo, RYC (2001). Towards development of an edible vaccine against bovine pneumonic pasteurellosis using transgenic white clover expressing a Mannheimia haemolytica leukotoxin 50 fusion protein. Infection and Immunity 69: 57865793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, J and Clinkenbeard, KD (1999). Lipopolysaccharide complexes with Pasteurella haemolytica leukotoxin. Infection and Immunity 67: 29202927.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, J, Clinkenbeard, KD and Ritchey, JW (1999). Bovine CD18 identified as a species specific receptor for Pasteurella haemolytica leukotoxin. Veterinary Microbiology 67: 9197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Libersa, H, Van Huffel, B and Madelenat, A (1995). Evaluation of the efficacy of a new antibiotic, florfenicol (Nuflor) in the treatment of bovine respiratory disease. Recueil de Médecine Vétérinaire 171: 3944.Google Scholar
Lillie, LE and Thomson, RG (1972). The pulmonary clearance of bacteria by calves and mice. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine 36: 129137.Google ScholarPubMed
Lo, RY (1990). Molecular characterization of cytotoxins produced by Haemophilus, Actinobacillus, Pasteurella. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 54: S33S35.Google ScholarPubMed
Lo, RYC and Shewen, PE (1991). The genus Pasteurella. In: Balows, A, Truper, HG, Dworkin, M, Harder, W and Schliefer, KH (eds) The Prokaryotes, 2nd edn.New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Lo, RYC, Shewen, PE, Strathdee, CA and Greer, CN (1985). Cloning and expression of the leukotoxin gene of Pasteurella haemeolytica A1 in Escherichia coli K-12. Infection and Immunity 50: 557571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lo, RYC, Strathdee, CA and Shewen, PE (1987). Nucleotide sequence of the leukotoxin genes of Pasteurella haemolytica A1. Infection and Immunity 55: 19871996.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lo, RY, Strathdee, CA, Shewen, PE and Cooney, BJ (1991). Molecular studies of Ssa1, a serotype-specific antigen of Pasteurella haemolytica A1. Infection and Immunity 59: 33983406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopez, A, Thomson, RG and Savan, M (1976). The pulmonary clearance of Pasteurella haemolytica in calves infected with bovine parainfluenza 3 virus. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine 40: 385391.Google Scholar
Martin, SW (1983). Vaccination: is it effective in preventing respiratory disease or influencing weight gains in feedlot calves? Canadian Veterinary Journal 24: 1019.Google ScholarPubMed
Martin, SW (1989). An overview of field trials in veterinary medicine. Canadian Veterinary Journal 30: 302303.Google ScholarPubMed
Mechor, GD, Jim, GK and Janzen, ED (1988). Comparison of penicillin, oxytetracycline, and trimethoprim-sulfadoxine in the treatment of acute undifferentiated bovine respiratory disease. Canadian Veterinary Journal 29: 438443.Google ScholarPubMed
Miller, AW, Howard, LH, Bayard, ES, Smith, RW, Stanard, SJ, Jones, JD, Hilton, G, Killham, BJ and Truam, J (1927). Report of committee on miscellaneous transmissible diseases. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 70: 952955.Google Scholar
Morck, DW, Raybould, TJ, Acres, SD, Babiuk, LA, Nelligan, J and Costerton, JW (1987). Electron microscopic description of glycocalyx and fimbriae on the surface of Pasteurella haemolytica-A1. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 51: 8388.Google ScholarPubMed
Morck, DW, Watts, TC, Acres, SD and Costerton, JW (1988). Electron microscopic examination of cells of Pasteurella haemolytica A1 in experimentally infected cattle. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 52: 343348.Google ScholarPubMed
Morck, DW, Olson, ME, Acres, SD, Daoust, PY and Costerton, JW (1989). Presence of bacterial glycocalyx and fimbriae on Pasteurella haemolytica in feedlot cattle with pneumonic pasteurellosis. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 53: 167171.Google ScholarPubMed
Morck, DW, Ellis, BD, Domingue, PA, Olson, ME and Costerton, JW (1991). In vivo expression of iron regulated outer-membrane proteins in Pasteurella haemolytica-A1. Microbial Pathogenesis 11: 373378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morton, RJ, Simons, KR and Confer, AW (1996). Major outer membrane proteins of Pasteurella haemolytica serovars 1–15: comparison of separation techniques and surface-exposed proteins on selected serovars. Veterinary Microbiology 51: 319330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mosier, DA, Confer, AW and Panciera, RJ (1989). The evolution of vaccines for bovine pneumonic pasteurellosis. Research in Veterinary Science 47: 110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mosier, DA, Simons, KR and Vestweber, JG (1995). Passive protection of calves with Pasteurella haemolytica antiserum. American Journal of Veterinary Research 56: 13171321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mosier, DA, Panciera, RJ, Rogers, DP, Uhlich, GA, Butine, MD, Confer, AW and Basaraba, RJ (1998). Comparison of serologic and protective responses induced by two Pasteurella vaccines. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 62: 178182.Google ScholarPubMed
Murphy, GL, Whitworth, LC, Clinkenbeard, KD and Clinkenbeard, PA (1995). Haemolytic activity of Pasteurella haemolytica leukotoxin. Infection and Immunity 63: 32093212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nardini, PM, Mellors, A and Lo, RY (1998). Characterization of a fourth lipoprotein from Pasteurella haemolytica A1 and its homology to the OmpA family of outer membrane proteins. FEMS Microbiology Letters 165: 7177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newsome, IE and Cross, F (1932). Some bipolar organisms found in pneumonia in sheep. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 80: 711719.Google Scholar
Ogunnariwo, JA and Schryvers, AB (1990). Iron acquisition in Pasteurella haemolytica: expression and identification of a bovine-specific transferrin receptor. Infection and Immunity 58: 20912097.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orrenius, S, Zhivotovsky, B and Nicotera, P (2003). Regulation of cell death: the calcium-apoptosis link. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 4: 552565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pandher, K, Confer, AW and Murphy, GL (1998). Genetic and immunologic analyses of PlpE, a lipoprotein important in complement-mediated killing of Pasteurella haemolytica serotype 1. Infection and Immunity 66: 56135619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pandher, K, Murphy, GL and Confer, AW (1999). Identification of immunogenic, surface-exposed outer membrane proteins of Pasteurella haemolytica serotype 1. Veterinary Microbiology 65: 215226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Potter, AA, Schryvers, AB, Ogunnariwo, JA, Hutchins, WA, Lo, RY and Watts, T (1999). Protective capacity of the Pasteurella haemolytica transferrin-binding proteins TbpA and TbpB in cattle. Microbial Pathogenesis 27: 197206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purdy, CW, Livingston, CW and Frank, GH (1986). A live Pasteurella haemolytica vaccine efficacy trial. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 188: 589591.Google ScholarPubMed
Purdy, CW, Richards, AB and Foster, GS (1991). Market stress-associated changes in serum complement activity in feeder calves. American Journal of Veterinary Research 52: 18421847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purdy, CW, Raleigh, RH, Collins, JK, Watts, JL and Straus, DC (1997). Serotyping and enzyme characterizations of Pasteurella haemolytica and Pasteurella multocida isolates recovered from pneumonic lungs of stressed feeder calves. Current Microbiology 34: 244249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quinn, PJ (1994). Clinical Veterinary Microbiology. London: Wolfe, pp. 254258.Google Scholar
Radostits, OM, Blood, DC and Gay, CC (1994). Veterinary Medicine, 8th edn.London: Bailliere Tindall.Google Scholar
Ribble, CS (1989). Design considerations in clinical trials. Canadian Veterinary Journal 30: 292294.Google ScholarPubMed
Ribble, CS, Meek, AH, Shewen, PE, Guichon, PT and Jim, GK (1995a). Effect of pretransit mixing on fatal fibrinous pneumonia in calves. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 207: 616619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ribble, CS, Meek, AH, Jim, GK and Guichon, PT (1995b). The pattern of fatal fibrinous pneumonia (shipping fever) affecting calves in a large feedlot in Alberta (1985–1988. Canadian Veterinary Journal 36: 753757.Google Scholar
Rossi, C and Kiesel, GK (1977). Susceptibility of bovine macrophages and tracheal-ring cultures to bovine viruses. American Journal of Veterinary Research 38: 17051708.Google ScholarPubMed
Schipper, IA and Kelling, CL (1971). Shipping fever prophylaxis: comparison of vaccine and antibiotics administered following weaning. Canadian Veterinary Journal 12: 172175.Google ScholarPubMed
Schumann, FJ, Janzen, ED and McKinnon, JJ (1990). Prophylactic tilmicosin medication of feedlot calves at arrival. Canadian Veterinary Journal 31: 285288.Google ScholarPubMed
Schunicht, OC, Booker, CW, Guichon, PT, Jim, KG, Wildman, BK, Pitman, TJ and Perrett, T (2007). An evaluation of the relative efficacy of tulathromycin for the treatment of undifferentiated fever in feedlot calves in Nebraska. Canadian Veterinary Journal 48: 600606.Google ScholarPubMed
Shewen, PE and Conlon, JA (1993). Pasteurella. In: Gyles, CL and Thoen, CO (eds) Pathogenesis of Bacterial Infections in Animals, 2nd edn.Ames, IA: Iowa State University, pp. 216225.Google Scholar
Shewen, PE and Wilkie, BN (1982). Cytotoxin of Pasteurella haemolytica acting on bovine leukocytes. Infection and Immunity 35: 9194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shewen, PE and Wilkie, BN (1983). Pasteurella haemolytica cytotoxin: production by recognized serotypes and neutralization by type-specific rabbit antisera. American Journal of Veterinary Research 44: 715719.Google ScholarPubMed
Shewen, PE and Wilkie, BN (1985). Evidence for the Pasteurella haemolytica cytotoxin as a product of actively growing bacteria. American Journal of Veterinary Research 46: 12121214.Google ScholarPubMed
Shewen, PE and Wilkie, BN (1988). Vaccination of calves with leukotoxic culture supernatant from Pasteurella haemolytica. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 52: 3036.Google ScholarPubMed
Shewen, PE, Sharp, A and Wilkie, BN (1988). Efficacy testing a Pasteurella haemolytica extract vaccine. Veterinary Medicine 83: 10781083.Google Scholar
Slocombe, RF, Derksen, FJ, Robinson, NE, Trapp, A, Gupta, A and Newman, JP (1984). Interactions of cold stress and Pasteurella haemolytica in the pathogenesis of pneumonic pasteurellosis in calves: method of induction and hematologic and pathologic changes. American Journal of Veterinary Research 45: 17571763.Google ScholarPubMed
Slocombe, RF, Malark, J, Ingersoll, R, Derksen, FJ and Robinson, NE (1985). Importance of neutrophils in the pathogenesis of acute pneumonic pasteurellosis in calves. American Journal of Veterinary Research 46: 22532258.Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, CK, Davidson, JN and Henry, CW (1985). Evaluating a live vaccine for Pasteurella haemolytica in dairy calves. Veterinary Medicine 80: 7888.Google Scholar
Smith, GR (1961). The characteristics of two types of Pasteurella haemolytica associated with different pathological conditions of sheep. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 81: 431440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneath, PH and Stevens, M (1990). Actinobacillus rossii sp. nov., Actinobacillus seminis sp. nov., nom. rev., Pasteurella bettii sp. nov., Pasteurella lymphangitidis sp. nov., Pasteurella mairi sp. nov., and Pasteurella trehalosi sp. nov. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 40: 148153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Squire, PG, Smiley, DW and Croskell, RB (1984). Identification and extraction of Pasteurella haemolytica membrane proteins. Infection and Immunity 45: 667673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Srinand, S, Hsuan, SL, Yoo, HS, Maheswaran, SK, Ames, TR and Werdin, RE (1996). Comparative evaluation of antibodies induced by commercial Pasteurella haemolytica vaccines using solid phase immunoassays. Veterinary Microbiology 49: 181195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strathdee, CA and Lo, RY (1987). Extensive homology between the leukotoxin of Pasteurella haemolytica A1 and the alpha-hemolysin of Escherichia coli. Infection and Immunity 55: 32333236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strathdee, CA and Lo, RY (1989). Cloning, nucleotide sequence and characterization of genes encoding the secretion function of the Pasteurella haemolytica leukotoxin determinant. Journal of Bacteriology 171: 916928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Straus, DC and Purdy, CW (1994). In vivo production of neuraminidase by Pasteurella haemolytica A1 in goats after transthoracic challenge. Infection and Immunity 62: 46754678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Straus, DC, Purdy, CW, Loan, RW, Briggs, RF and Frank, GH (1998). In vivo production of neuraminidase by Pasteurella haemolytica in market stressed cattle after natural infection. Current Microbiology 37: 240244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, Y, Clinkenbeard, KD, Cudd, LA, Clarke, CR and Clinkenbeard, PA (1999). Correlation of Pasteurella haemolytica leukotoxin binding with susceptibility to intoxication of lymphoid cells from various species. Infection and Immunity 67: 62646269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, Y, Clinkenbeard, KD, Ownby, CL, Cudd, LA, Clarke, CR and Highlander, SK (2000). Ultrastructural characterization of apoptosis in bovine lymphocytes exposed to Pasteurella haemolytica leukotoxin. American Journal of Veterinary Research 61: 5156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tatum, FM, Briggs, RE, Sreevatsan, SS, Zehr, ES, Hsuan, SL, Whiteley, LO, Ames, TR and Maheswaran, SK (1998). Construction of an isogenic leukotoxin deletion mutant of Pasteurella haemolytica serotype 1: characterization and virulence. Microbial Pathogenesis 24: 3746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomson, RG (1984). Pathogenesis of pneumonia in feedlot cattle. In: Loan, RW (ed.) Bovine Respiratory Disease. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Thorlakson, B, Martin, W and Peters, D (1990). A field trial to evaluate the efficacy of a commercial Pasteurella haemolytica bacterial extract in preventing bovine respiratory disease. Canadian Veterinary Journal 31: 573579.Google ScholarPubMed
Ulevitch, RJ and Tobias, PS (1995). Receptor-dependent mechanisms of cell stimulation by bacterial endotoxin. Annual Review of Immunology 13: 437457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Donkersgoed, J (1992). Meta-analysis of field trials of antimicrobial mass medication for prophylaxis of bovine respiratory disease in feedlot cattle. Canadian Veterinary Journal 33: 786795.Google ScholarPubMed
Van Donkersgoed, J, Ribble, CS, Boyer, LG and Townsend, HG (1993a). Epidemiological study of enzootic pneumonia in dairy calves in Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 57: 247254.Google ScholarPubMed
Van Donkersgoed, J, Schumann, FJ, Harland, RJ, Potter, AA and Janzen, ED (1993b). The effect of route and dosage of immunization on the serological response to a Pasteurella haemolytica and Haemophilus somnus vaccine in feedlot calves. Canadian Veterinary Journal 34: 731735.Google ScholarPubMed
Van Donkersgoed, J, Potter, AA, Mollinson, B and Harland, RJ (1994). The effect of a combined Pasteurella haemolytica and Haemophilus somnus vaccine and a modified-live bovine respiratory syncytial virus vaccine against enzootic pneumonia in young beef calves. Canadian Veterinary Journal 35: 239241.Google Scholar
Van Donkersgoed, J, Guenther, C, Evans, BN, Potter, AA and Harland, RJ (1995). Effects of various vaccination protocols on passive and active immunity to Pasteurella haemolytica and Haemophilus somnus in beef calves. Canadian Veterinary Journal 36: 424429.Google ScholarPubMed
Varma, KJ, Lockwood, PW, Cosgrove, SB and Rogers, ER (1998). Pharmacology, safety, and clinical efficacy of Nuflor (florfenicol) following subcutaneous administration to cattle. Proceedings of the Symposium ‘Nuflor – New Therapeutic Applications’ held in conjunction with the XX World Buiatrics Congress, Sydney, Australia, pp. 1319.Google Scholar
Vogel, GJ, Laudert, SB, Zimmermann, A, Guthrie, CA, Mechor, GD and Moore, GM (1998). Effects of tilmicosin on acute undifferentiated respiratory tract disease in newly arrived feedlot cattle. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 212: 19191924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, JF, Kieba, IR, Korostoff, J, Guo, TL, Yamaguchi, N, Rozmiarek, H, Billings, PC, Shenker, BJ and Lally, ET (1998a). Molecular and biochemical mechanisms of Pasteurella haemolytica leukotoxin-induced cell death. Microbial Pathogenesis 25: 317331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Z, Clarke, C and Clinkenbeard, K (1998b). Pasteurella haemolytica leukotoxin-induced increase in phospholipase A2 activity in bovine neutrophils. Infection and Immunity 66: 18851890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watts, JL, JrYancey, RJ, Salmon, SA and Case, CA (1994). A 4-year survey of antimicrobial susceptibility trends for isolates from cattle with bovine respiratory disease in North America. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 32: 725731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, DJ, Bauer, MC, Whiteley, LO, Maheswaran, SK and Ames, TR (1991). Changes in blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid components in calves with experimentally induced pneumonic pasteurellosis. American Journal of Veterinary Research 52: 337344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wellman, NG and O'Connor, AM (2007). Meta-analysis of treatment of cattle with bovine respiratory disease with tulathromycin. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 30: 234241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welsh, RD, Dye, LB, Payton, ME and Confer, AW (2004). Isolation and antimicrobial susceptibilities of bacterial pathogens from bovine pneumonia: 1994–2002. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 16: 426431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whiteley, LO, Maheswaran, SK, Weiss, DJ, Ames, TR and Kannan, MS (1992). Pasteurella haemolytica A1 and bovine respiratory disease: pathogenesis. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 6: 1122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkie, BN, Markham, RJ and Shewen, PE (1980). Response of calves to lung challenge exposure with Pasteurella haemolytica after parenteral or pulmonary immunization. American Journal of Veterinary Research 41: 17731778.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilson, SH (1989). Why are meaningful field trials difficult to achieve for bovine respiratory disease vaccines? Canadian Veterinary Journal 30: 299302.Google ScholarPubMed
Woldehiwet, Z and Sharma, R (1992). Evidence of immunosuppression by bovine respiratory syncytial virus. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology 11: 7580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Younan, M and Fodor, L (1995). Characterization of a new Pasteurella haemolytica serotype (A17). Research in Veterinary Science 58: 98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, C (1995). Antimicrobial metaphylaxis for undifferentiated bovine respiratory disease. Compendium on Continuing Education for the Practicing Veterinarian 17: 133142.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Host–bacterium–environment interactions in Mannheimia haemolytica pneumonia of cattle. (A) Homeostasis in the commensal state; (B) environmental factors tip the balance to favor lung colonization and disease; (C) intervention strategies restore homeostasis.