Hostname: page-component-686fd747b7-mrck6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-13T12:25:58.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond Self-Interest: Why the Market Rewards Those Who Reject It? by Krzysztof Pelc Oxford University Press, 2022

Review products

Beyond Self-Interest: Why the Market Rewards Those Who Reject It? by Krzysztof Pelc Oxford University Press, 2022

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2023

Kristen R. Collins
Kristen R. Collins*
Affiliation:
George Mason University, USA
*
Email: kcollins@mercatus.gmu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 22 , Issue 5 , December 2023 , pp. 708 - 711
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The World Trade Organization

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Pelc, K. (2022) Beyond Self-Interest: Why the Market Rewards Those Who Reject It. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 11–12Google Scholar.

2 Pelc, 23.

3 Pelc, 65–66.

4 Pelc, 68.

5 Smith, A. (1976) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, vol. 2. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, I.ii.2, 26–27Google Scholar.

6 Smith, I.ii.2, 26.

7 Pelc, 86–87.

8 Pelc, 92.

9 Pelc, 139–140.

10 Pelc, 169.

11 Müller, J.-W. (2016) What Is Populism?. University of Pennsylvania PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Pelc, 98. For a similar argument, see B. Litvin (2022) ‘“This Hearing Should Be Flipped”: Democratic Spectatorship, Social Media, and the Problem of Demagogic Candor’, American Political Science Review, 1–15, 6, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422000508.

13 Pelc, 171.

14 Pelc, 239.

15 Pelc, 236.

16 Michener, J. (2018) Fragmented Democracy: Medicaid, Federalism, and Unequal Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 169CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Collins, K.R. (2020) ‘Observed without Sympathy: Adam Smith on Inequality and Spectatorship’, American Journal of Political Science 64(4), 1034–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar, https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12544.

18 Soss, J., Fording, R.C., and Schram, S.F. (2011) Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 85–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Eubanks, V. (2019) Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York, NY: PicadorGoogle Scholar.

20 Pelc, 37.