Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T00:48:36.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Clinical and epidemiological description of aortic dissection in Turner's syndrome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2006

Claus Højbjerg Gravholt
Affiliation:
Medical department M (Endocrinology and Diabetes) and Medical Research Laboratories, Århus Sygehus, Århus University Hospital, Denmark
Kerstin Landin-Wilhelmsen
Affiliation:
Research Center for Endocrinology and Metabolism, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden
Kirstine Stochholm
Affiliation:
Medical department M (Endocrinology and Diabetes) and Medical Research Laboratories, Århus Sygehus, Århus University Hospital, Denmark
Britta Eilersen Hjerrild
Affiliation:
Medical department M (Endocrinology and Diabetes) and Medical Research Laboratories, Århus Sygehus, Århus University Hospital, Denmark
Thomas Ledet
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Biochemical Pathology, Århus Sygehus, Århus University Hospital, Denmark
Christian Born Djurhuus
Affiliation:
Medical department M (Endocrinology and Diabetes) and Medical Research Laboratories, Århus Sygehus, Århus University Hospital, Denmark
Lisskulla Sylvén
Affiliation:
Department of Woman and Child Health, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
Ulrik Baandrup
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, Århus University Hospital, Århus Sygehus, Denmark
Bent Østergaard Kristensen
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Skejby Hospital, Århus University Hospital, Denmark
Jens Sandahl Christiansen
Affiliation:
Medical department M (Endocrinology and Diabetes) and Medical Research Laboratories, Århus Sygehus, Århus University Hospital, Denmark
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: Women with Turner's syndrome have an increased risk of congenital cardiac malformations, ischaemic heart disease, hypertension and stroke. Aortic dissection seems to occur with increased frequency. Aim: To describe in more detail aortic dissection as encountered in Turner's syndrome, giving attention to clinical, histological and epidemiological aspects. Materials and methods: Based on a retrospective study, we describe the clinical, karyotypic, and epidemiological aspects of aortic dissection as encountered in cases of Turner's syndrome seen in Denmark and Sweden. Results: The median age at onset of aortic dissection in 18 women was 35 years, ranging from 18 to 61 years. Fourteen of 18 women had a 45,X karyotype, while 2 patients had 45,X/45,XY, and 2 had the 45,X/46,X+r(X) complement, respectively. Echocardiography was performed in 10 of 18 patients before their acute illness, and showed signs of congenital cardiac disease, with either bifoliate aortic valves, dilation of the aortic root, or previous aortic coarctation evident in most patients. In 5 patients evidence of a bifoliate aortic valve was conclusive. Hypertension was present in 5 of 18 patients, while 10 of the patients died from aortic dissection, of so-called type A in 6, type B in 3, while in the final case the origin of dissection could not be determined. Biochemical analysis showed altered ratio between type I and type III collagen. Histology showed cystic medial necrosis in 3 of 7 cases. We estimated an incidence of dissection of 36 per 100,000 Turner's syndrome years, compared with an incidence of 6 per 100,000 in the general population, and a cumulated rate of incidence of 14, 73, 78, and 50 per 100,000 among 0–19, 20–29, 30–39, and 40+ year olds, respectively. Conclusion: Aortic dissection is extremely common in the setting of Turner's syndrome, and occurs early in life. Patients with Turner's syndrome should be offered a protocol for clinical follow-up similar to that provided for patients with Marfan syndrome, and each clinic should embrace a programme for follow-up.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Females with Turner's syndrome have an increased risk of congenital cardiac defects, hypertension, ischaemic heart disease, and stroke.1 In addition to the familiar obstructive left-sided defects, recent cross-sectional studies have better delineated venous and arterial malformations,26 and clinical series describe the advent of sudden aortic dissection.5 When seen in Turner's syndrome, aortic dissection seems to be preceded in most cases by dilation of the aorta, which is influenced by hypertension.7 Dilation of the large arterial conduit vessels may also contribute,8, 9 although a few women may present without risk factors.10 There is little disagreement that females with Turner's syndrome should be monitored clinically not only during childhood and adolescence, but also during adulthood so as to avoid potentially lethal cardiovascular complications. There is, however, no consensus regarding which modalities to use, and the frequency of follow-up visits, in order to detect and prevent aortic dissection. So far echocardiography has been used in most clinics, but recent studies suggest that magnetic resonance imaging of the heart and great vessels might be a superior methodology.2 Further-more, the epidemiology of aortic dissection in Turner's syndrome has not been studied. In the present study we describe 18 cases, mostly occurring early in life, characterized with aspects of genetics, clinical and histological findings of aortic dissection among females with Turner's syndrome.

Material and methods

We identified cases with aortic dissection occurring between 1973 and 2006. Cases were ascertained through Danish national registries,1 through professional contact with patients in Denmark, and through personal contact with all University clinics in Sweden. In Denmark, we searched The Danish Register of Causes of Death, which contains computerized information from certificates relating to all deaths occurring in Denmark since 1973, including date of death, up to 4 causes of death registered using the International Classification of Diseases, version 8 and 10, and manner of death, where there are 5 possibilities, namely natural, accident, suicide, homicide, and unexplained if no information is available.11 The most recent update covers the period 1973 to 1999. Our study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency and the involved registers.

All cases of aortic dissection were characterized according to the Stanford classification, where type A dissections involves the ascending aorta regardless of site of the initial tear, and type B include all dissections not involving the ascending aorta.12

All patients had either undergone surgery, or else a post-mortem examination was performed. Some patients had both surgery and an autopsy. Histologic biopsies had been taken in 6 cases, and were re-examined by an experienced cardiac pathologist (UB). Biochemical examination of tissue blocks was performed in 7 cases. Tissue was shaken for 24 hours in a mixture of chloroform and methanol at ratios of 2 to 1 at room temperature in a volume of 3 millilitres. The tissue was dried for 24 hours. The dried tissue was crushed and placed in eppendorf tubes. The dry weight was noted. An equal volume of pepsin was added, along with 1000 microlitres of acetic acid at 0.5 molar concentration. The suspension was left for 21 hours at 4 degree, and thereafter for 3 hours at room temperature. The suspension was centrifuged for 15 minutes at 12,000 revolutions per minute. To the supernatant acetone was added to a final concentration of 50% and left for 18 hours at −20 degree Celsius. 100 microlitres of the sample was added to the ELISA well in a dilution of 1/10, and dried for 24 to 36 hours. Biotinylated goat antibody toward collagen type I and III was supplemented to the dried wells, followed by addition of streptavidin-HRP. The results are expressed as percentages.

Statistical analysis

To estimate an incidence rate of aortic dissection in the 11 Danish women with Turner's syndrome using standard epidemiological methods, we used data from the Danish Central Cytogenetic Registry.13 Here, 783 females with Turner's syndrome were identified by the end of 2001, and their total risk time calculated from birth was 27,495 years. Risk time was assessed from birth, and not from the date of diagnosis of the syndrome. The estimates given are thus the most conservative. We did not include the Swedish patients in these calculations, since we were not able to examine Swedish registers for cases with aortic dissection and Turner's syndrome.

Results

The median age at onset of aortic dissection was 35 years, ranging from 18 to 61 years. All cases are presented in Table 1. Echocardiography, which was performed prior to the acute occurrence of dissection in 10 of 18 cases, showed signs of congenital heart disease with either bifoliate aortic valves, dilation of the aortic root, previous aortic coarctation, or normal conditions. In 5 patients, the findings unequivocally identified bifoliate aortic valves. Hypertension was apparent clinically in 4 of the 18 patients, albeit that no information was available in 2 patients. Of the 18 patients, 10 died from aortic dissection, of type A in 6 patients, type B in 3, while in the final case the site of dissection could not be determined. Our second patient had given birth to twins about one year prior to the aortic dissection. The pregnancy was the result of egg donation. Shortly after being admitted to hospital, she underwent surgery, but it was not possible to fit a graft due to extreme fragility of the remaining aortic tissue, and she subsequently died. Our eighth patient, who was pregnant spontaneously, had the dissection diagnosed during the 7th month. She gave birth by caesarean section, and later a repair was performed, and she is still alive.14 Our ninth patient presented originally with coarctation of the aorta, a hypoplastic arch having been identified in childhood. A repair was performed, but subsequently a pseudoaneurysm developed. She declined re-operation. A year later, she was admitted acutely with signs of dissection. Re-operation was unsuccessful. Our fifteenth patient was diagnosed accidentally during participation in a scientific study, being without symptoms at the time. Approximately one year previously, she had been admitted to hospital with sudden dyspnoea and severe oppression in the upper part of the chest. She was diagnosed with pneumonia and recovered. During the stay in hospital, moderate aortic insufficiency was found. She has now undergone successful surgery for her type A dissection, which extended down to the renal arteries. Our sixteenth patient is the only one thus far who has not undergone surgery. She has been followed for 20 years in a clinic dedicated to Turner's syndrome, with two echocardiograhic examinations having been performed prior to the dissection, the latest in 2001, where the only noted abnormality was slight diastolic dysfunction. Hypertension had not been found prior to dissection. At the age of 61 years the patient was admitted acutely to hospital, and a type B dissection was found starting just distal to a left subclavian artery and stretching below the renal arteries, as well as a bifoliate aortic valve, which had not previously been observed. Our eighth14 and twelfth patients carry the rarer karyotype 45,X/46,XY, but fulfilled the criterions for the clinical diagnosis of Turner's syndrome, and are therefore included in the current study.

Table 1. Clinical characteristics of Turner's syndrome patients with aortic dissection.

The classical karyotype, 45,X, was present in 14 patients, and congenital malformations were present in all but one of those examined pre-morbidly by echocardiography.

Biochemical analysis showed that collagen type I amounted to 61.5%, with a standard error of the mean of 13.5%, while the amount of collagen type III was 38.5%, with a standard error of the mean of 8.9%. Histology showed cystic media necrosis in 3 of 7 cases. All histological data are presented in Table 2.

Table 2. Histological findings in the Turner's syndrome patients.

We calculated a crude estimate of the incidence of aortic dissection in Turner's syndrome. Of the patients collected in this review, 11 are Danish, giving an incidence rate of 40 per 100,000 Turner's syndrome years. Among 0 to 19, 20 to 29, 30 to 39, and 40+ year olds the incidence rates were 14, 73, 78 and 50 per 100,000 years, respectively (Fig. 1). At any age in the entire population in Denmark with Turner's syndrome, aortic dissection occurred in 11 of 783 females, or in 1.4 per 100 females with Turner's syndrome.

Figure 1. The incidence of aortic dissection per 100,000 years in women with Turner's syndrome and in the general population. Gray bars illustrate females with Turner's syndrome in different age groups, and the dark gray bar indicates the total incidence rate for the entire background population.14,15

Discussion

The most striking finding in our series of patients is the young age at which aortic dissection takes place in setting of Turner's syndrome. The incidence of aortic dissection in the population has been estimated to be 6 per 100,000 per year, with a female median age at occurrence of 77 years,15 and with a ratio of males to females of 2 to 1.16 The average age range for aortic dissection is 50 to 80 years,15 in comparison with a median age of 35 years in our patients. Aortic dissection in that age range is seen only in patients with connective tissue disorders, like Marfan and Ehlers-Danlos syndromes, which are also conditions with increased risk of dilation, aneurysm, and rupture. The most consistent risk factor for aortic dissection is arterial hypertension, which is present in nine-tenths of cases,16 as well as congenital bifoliate or unicommissural aortic valves,17, 18 and coarctation of the aorta.18, 19 In addition, pregnancy, trauma, and iatrogenic-induced trauma are risk factors.18, 19 Amongst our patients, a history of hypertension was present in one-third. In a British study, dilation of the aortic root was seen in two-fifths of 38 women with Turner's syndrome, in association with elevated systolic blood pressure.7 Lately, increased diameters of the great arteries, as well as increased carotid intimal thickness, has also been documented.8, 9 How these findings affect the development of aneurysms and dissection is at present not clear. Importantly, some patients did not have any known risk factors besides Turner's syndrome prior to dissection, possibly due to the fact that they had not had a thorough cardiovascular examination performed.

The distribution of karyotypes, with three quarters of our patients having the 45,X karyotype, differs from the pattern seen in a typical population of females with Turner's syndrome, where approximately half have the 45,X karyotype.13 Of our patients, 2 had the 45,X/46,XY karyotype. Karyotypes with Y chromosomal material typically make up only about 5% of the total population with Turner's syndrome.13 Sybert,5 and Gotzsche et al.,6 also reported a highly increased risk of cardiovascular malformations associated with the 45,X/46,XY karyotype. The karyotype 45,X/46,XY may result in a multitude of clinical phenotypes, and is often classified as “mixed gonadal dysgenesis”, ranging from a normal fertile male via a female with classic features compatible with Turner's syndrome to a normal fertile female. The designation “Turner's syndrome” is a clinical characterization. Today, no firm guidelines exist for the diagnosis,20 but most agree that the cardinal stigmas include retardation of growth, with reduced adult height with or without additional phenotypical features, and except in rare cases, also gonadal insufficiency, and infertility. Since the women fulfilled the criterions for a clinical diagnosis of Turner's syndrome, we chose to include the two women in the study. The 45,X karyotype is most often associated with congenital malformations of the aorta, as well as other organs.1, 5

The Danish patients in our study were found in the Register of Causes of Death and through clinical contact, and form the basis for the epidemiological estimates presented. Previously, we have used the National Register of Patients in the study of Turner's syndrome.1 This registry could not be used in the present context, because it is not sufficiently precise for the study of specific diagnoses like aortic dissection,21 but only for the study of categories of diagnoses like “ischaemic heart disease” or “hypertension”. We could, therefore, have missed a few patients with Turner's syndrome who survived an aortic dissection, and had not necessarily surfaced during clinical contact to the relevant departments. The estimate we present, therefore, will be very conservative, and likely to be an underestimate of the real incidence of aortic dissection. It can be presumed, nevertheless, to be unbiased in other respects, and it will be helpful in the future in unravelling the association between Turner's syndrome and aortic dissection. We found a crude incidence of 40 per 100,000 Turner's syndrome years, greatly exceeding the estimate in the background population, with an even higher incidence rate during 20 to 29 years and 30 to 39 years of 73 and 78 per 100,000 Turner's syndrome years, respectively. In other words, at least 1.4 per 100 females with Turner's syndrome will suffer from aortic dissection. We strongly suspect that aortic dissection is grossly over-represented among women with Turner's syndrome.

Turner's syndrome is usually not included as a risk condition in reviews on aortic dissection.16, 22, 23 Presently, no abnormalities of the aortic wall have been identified in Turner's syndrome. Cystic medial necrosis has been described in some cases, but there are no known biochemical or genetic abnormalities. We found a skewed distribution between collagen type I and III towards more collagen type I, which in normal persons normally is distributed with 30% type I and 70% type III collagen.24 Although the numbers are small, and possibly confounded by the fact that we were not able to include an age-matched group of normal women, we believe that the finding may be informative. A study of aborted fetuses with Turner's syndrome revealed abnormal extracellular matrix of nuchal skin, with increased amounts of glycosaminoglycans relative to the proteoglycan, biglycan.25 The biglycan gene is on the X chromosome and haploinsufficiency of the gene may cause decreased expression. If such an abnormality is also present in the aorta, this may contribute to promoting aortic aneurysms, and eventually, dissection. Support for this suggestion could be the relation between the 45,X karyotype and congenital malformations of the heart in Turner's syndrome.5 Bifoliate aortic valves predominate with the 45,X karyotype,5 as does coarctation of the aorta.26 Coarctation of the aorta occurs more than 350 times as frequent in this syndrome in comparison with the general population.1

Spontaneous pregnancy is a rare event in Turner's syndrome.14, 27, 28 Owing to an increasing number of egg donation programmes, more patients can be expected to become pregnant in the future.29 A recent paper describes a high risk of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy occurring in 5 of 8 completed pregnancies, as well as premature delivery occurring in half.30 Due to the changes associated with pregnancy in blood pressure, cardiac work load, and so on, the risk of aortic dissection is likely to be increased, and two of our patients were either going through a pregnancy, or had done so within the last year. Uneventful cases of pregnancy have been reported,27, 31, 32 albeit that fatal and non-fatal cases due to aortic dissection have also been described.14, 3336 It seems justifiable to keep pregnant women with Turner's syndrome, and women desiring pregnancy, closely monitored.37

Aortic dissection is a serious complication in Turner's syndrome. Patients with Turner's syndrome should be offered a protocol for clinical follow-up similar to that offered the patients with Marfan syndrome, and each clinic should establish a suitable programme for follow-up.38 With our current knowledge, it seems prudent to keep blood pressure as tightly controlled as possible. Prospective studies are needed in order to establish the exact risk of aortic dissection, which imaging modalities to use,39, 40 to identify patients with an elevated risk, and, if possible, to introduce procedures and/or medicine to lower the risk, both during pregnancy and normal life.

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by a grant from the Danish Health Research Council, grant number 9600822 (Århus University – Novo Nordisk Centre for Research in Growth and Regeneration), and Frimurare-Barnhusdirektionen, Göteborg, Sweden. The expert secretarial assistance of Line Gether is acknowledged.

References

Gravholt CH, Juul S, Naeraa RW, Hansen J. Morbidity in Turner syndrome. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 147158.Google Scholar
Ho VB, Bakalov VK, Cooley M, et al. Major vascular anomalies in turner syndrome: prevalence and magnetic resonance angiographic features. Circulation 2004; 110: 16941700.Google Scholar
Dawson FKL, Wright AM, Bakker B, Pitlick PT, Rosenfeld RG. Cardiovascular evaluation in Turner syndrome: utility of MR imaging. Australas Radiol 1992; 36: 204209.Google Scholar
Mazzanti L , Cacciari E. Congenital heart disease in patients with Turner's syndrome. Italian Study Group for Turner Syndrome (ISGTS). J Pediatr 1998; 133: 688692.Google Scholar
Sybert VP. Cardiovascular malformations and complications in Turner syndrome. Pediatrics 1998; 101: E11E17.Google Scholar
Gotzsche CO, Krag Olsen B, Nielsen J, Sorensen KE, Kristensen BO. Prevalence of cardiovascular malformations and association with karyotypes in Turner's syndrome. Arch Dis Child 1994; 71: 433436.Google Scholar
Elsheikh M, Casadei B, Conway GS, Wass JA. Hypertension is a major risk factor for aortic root dilatation in women with Turner's syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2001; 54: 6973.Google Scholar
Baguet JP, Douchin S, Pierre H, Rossignol AM, Bost M, Mallion JM. Structural and functional abnormalities of large arteries in the Turner syndrome. Heart 2005; 91: 14421446.Google Scholar
Ostberg JE, Donald AE, Halcox JP, Storry C, McCarthy C, Conway GS. Vasculopathy in Turner syndrome: arterial dilatation and intimal thickening without endothelial dysfunction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005; 90: 51615166.Google Scholar
Lin AE, Lippe B, Rosenfeld RG. Further delineation of aortic dilation, dissection, and rupture in patients with Turner syndrome. Pediatr Electron Pages 1998; 102: 1220.Google Scholar
Juel K, Helweg-Larsen K. The Danish registers of causes of death. Dan Med Bull 1999; 46: 354357.Google Scholar
Isselbacher EM. Diseases of the aorta. In: Braunwald E, Zipes DP, Libby P, Bonow RO (eds.). Braunwald's Heart Disease. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, 2004, pp. 14031436.
Gravholt CH, Juul S, Naeraa RW, Hansen J. Prenatal and postnatal prevalence of Turner's syndrome: a registry study. BMJ 1996; 312: 1621.Google Scholar
Landin-Wilhelmsen K, Bryman I, Hanson C, Hanson L. Spontaneous pregnancies in a Turner syndrome woman with Y-chromosome mosaicism. J Assist Reprod Genet 2004; 21: 229230.Google Scholar
Bickerstaff LK, Pairolero PC, Hollier LH, et al. Thoracic aortic aneurysms: a population-based study. Surgery 1982; 92: 11031108.Google Scholar
Hagan PG, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher EM, et al. The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease. JAMA 2000; 283: 897903.Google Scholar
Larson EW, Edwards WD. Risk factors for aortic dissection: a necropsy study of 161 cases. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53: 849855.Google Scholar
Spittell PC, Spittell Jr JA, Joyce JW, et al. Clinical features and differential diagnosis of aortic dissection: experience with 236 cases (1980 through 1990). Mayo Clin Proc 1993; 68: 642651.Google Scholar
Roberts WC. Aortic dissection: anatomy, consequences, and causes. Am Heart J 1981; 101: 195214.Google Scholar
Saenger P, Wikland KA, Conway GS, et al. Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of Turner syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86: 30613069.Google Scholar
Mosbech J, Jorgensen J, Madsen M, Rostgaard K, Thornberg K, Poulsen TD. [The national patient registry. Evaluation of data quality]. Ugeskr Laeger 1995; 157: 37413745.Google Scholar
Nienaber CA, Eagle KA. Aortic dissection: new frontiers in diagnosis and management: Part I: from etiology to diagnostic strategies. Circulation 2003; 108: 628635.Google Scholar
Immer FF, Bansi AG, Immer-Bansi AS, et al. Aortic dissection in pregnancy: analysis of risk factors and outcome. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76: 309314.Google Scholar
McCullagh KA, Balian G. Collagen characterisation and cell transformation in human atherosclerosis. Nature 1975; 258: 7375.Google Scholar
von Kaisenberg CS, Prols F, Nicolaides KH, Maass N, Meinhold-Heerlein I, Brand-Saberi B. Glycosaminoglycans and proteoglycans in the skin of aneuploid fetuses with increased nuchal translucency. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 25442561.Google Scholar
Loscalzo ML, Van PL, Ho VB, et al. Association between fetal lymphedema and congenital cardiovascular defects in Turner syndrome. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 732735.Google Scholar
Nielsen J, Sillesen I, Hansen KB. Fertility in women with Turner's syndrome. Case report and review of literature. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1979; 86: 833835.Google Scholar
Hovatta O. Pregnancies in women with Turner's syndrome. Ann Med 1999; 31: 106110.Google Scholar
Foudila T, Soderstrom-Anttila V, Hovatta O. Turner's syndrome and pregnancies after oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 532535.Google Scholar
Bodri D, Vernaeve V, Figueras F, Vidal R, Guillen JJ, Coll O. Oocyte donation in patients with Turner's syndrome: a successful technique but with an accompanying high risk of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 829832.Google Scholar
Swapp GH, Johnston AW, Watt JL, Couzin DA, Stephen GS. A fertile woman with non-mosaic Turner's syndrome. Case report and review of the literature. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 876880.Google Scholar
Kaneko N, Kawagoe S, Hiroi M. Turner's syndrome–review of the literature with reference to a successful pregnancy outcome. Gynaecol Obstet Invest 1990; 29: 8187.Google Scholar
Birdsall M, Kennedy S. The risk of aortic dissection in women with Turner syndrome [letter]. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 15871587.Google Scholar
Nagel TC, Tesch LG. ART and high risk patients! [letter]. Fertil Steril 1997; 68: 748749.Google Scholar
Beauchesne LM, Connolly HM, Ammash NM, Warnes CA. Coarctation of the aorta: outcome of pregnancy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38: 17281733.Google Scholar
Weytjens C, Bove T, Van Der NP. Aortic dissection and Turner's syndrome. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2000; 41: 295297.Google Scholar
The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Increased maternal cardiovascular mortality associated with pregnancy in women with Turner syndrome. Fertil Steril 2005; 83: 10741075.
Gravholt CH. Turner syndrome and the heart: cardiovascular complications and treatment strategies. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2002; 2: 401413.Google Scholar
Ostberg JE, Brookes JA, McCarthy C, Halcox J, Conway GS. A comparison of echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging in cardiovascular screening of adults with Turner syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004; 89: 59665971.Google Scholar
Chalard F, Ferey S, Teinturier C, Kalifa G. Aortic dilatation in Turner syndrome: the role of MRI in early recognition. Pediatr Radiol 2005; 35: 323326.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1.

Figure 1

Table 2.

Figure 2

The incidence of aortic dissection per 100,000 years in women with Turner's syndrome and in the general population. Gray bars illustrate females with Turner's syndrome in different age groups, and the dark gray bar indicates the total incidence rate for the entire background population.14,15