Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T09:42:25.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessment of epithelial cells' immune and inflammatory response to Staphylococcus aureus when exposed to a macrolide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2010

Maria Mazzilli
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Pathology, Hygiene and Public Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 10, 20133 Milano, Italy
Alfonso Zecconi*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Pathology, Hygiene and Public Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 10, 20133 Milano, Italy
*
*For correspondence; e-mail: alfonso.zecconi@unimi.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Non-specific (innate) immune response plays a major role in defending the udder from bacterial invasion. Moreover, recent investigations suggest that mammary gland epithelial cells (MGEC) could have a large and important role as a source of soluble components of immune defences. Despite many attempts to find other ways to control/prevent mastitis (i.e. vaccine) antimicrobial therapy is still the most used and effective means of curing clinical and subclinical mastitis. However, drug concentrations and therapy durations are far from the optimal in order to reduce costs. Therefore, efficacy of antimicrobial therapy is dependent not only on the substance activity but also on the positive interactions with the host innate immune response. Surprisingly, information on these interactions is rather scarce in the mastitis field. A simple experimental model was developed based on BME-UV cell line, Staphylococcus aureus as a challenge and a macrolide as an antimicrobial to assess the interactions among epithelial cells, Staph. aureus and the potential effects of antimicrobials on the immune system. The results of this study confirmed that tylosin has good antimicrobial activity against both intracellular and extracellular Staph. aureus in bovine MGEC without affecting cell functions. In this study, a significant down-regulation of IL-1 and IL-6 was observed, while TNF and IL-8 expression rate numerically increased, but differences were not significant. To our knowledge, this is the first paper assessing the concentration of two lysosomal enzymes, lysozyme and N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase (NAGase), in Staph. aureus-stimulated MGEC. The results of this study confirmed that tylosin could have a significant effect on the release of these enzymes. Moreover, even if both enzymes have a similar substrate as a target, the results suggest different secretion mechanisms and an influence of antimicrobial treatment on these mechanisms. Successful mastitis cure is the result of achieving the optimal efficiency of both innate immune defences and therapeutical activities, by means of killing bacteria without eliciting an excessive inflammatory response. Therefore, antimicrobials for mastitis therapy should be selected not only on bacterial sensitivity, but also for their positive interactions with the innate immune response of the mammary gland. This study showed that an in-vitro model based on Staph. aureus challenge on MGEC could be helpful in assessing both the intracellular and extracellular activity of antimicrobials and their influence on epithelial cell immune and inflammatory response.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2010

Mastitis is the most economically important disease in dairy herds worldwide, and it is caused by more than 100 bacterial species, even if several risk factors, including host susceptibility are relevant in the epidemiology of the disease.

Non-specific (innate) immune response plays a major role in defending the udder from bacterial invasion (Zecconi & Smith, Reference Zecconi and Smith2003; Rainard & Riollet, Reference Rainard and Riollet2006). Udder immune response has similar characteristics to the lung immune response. Indeed, innate cellular [polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) and macrophages] and soluble immune defences [cytokines, lysozyme, lactoferrin, defensins and N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase (NAGase)] are all involved in preventing bacterial adhesion, multiplication and in bacteria killing (Zecconi & Smith, Reference Zecconi and Smith2003; Burton & Erskine, Reference Burton and Erskine2003). Moreover, recent investigations suggest that mammary gland epithelial cells (MGEC) could have a large and important role as a source of soluble components of immune defences (Piccinini et al. Reference Piccinini, Binda, Belotti, Daprà and Zecconi2007; Rainard & Riollet, Reference Rainard and Riollet2006).

Despite many attempts to find other ways to control/prevent mastitis (i.e. vaccine) antimicrobial therapy is still the most used and effective means of curing clinical and subclinical mastitis. However, drug concentrations are largely lower and treatments have a shorter duration in food-producing animals in comparison with the ones applied in human medicine. Therefore, efficacy of therapy is dependent not only on the antimicrobial activity but also on the positive interactions with host innate immune response. Surprisingly, information on these interactions is rather scarce (Nickerson et al. Reference Nickerson, Paape and Dulin1985; Zecconi et al. Reference Zecconi, Piccinini, Bronzo and Casula1996; Hoeben et al. Reference Hoeben, Burvenich and Heynemann1997; Zecconi & Piccinini, Reference Zecconi and Piccinini2001).

The availability of stabilized cell lines such as BME-UV developed by Zavizion et al. (Reference Zavizion, van Duffelen, Schaeffer and Politis1996) allows the exploring of the interactions between bacteria and MGEC, including the innate immune response and opens the way to assess also the role of antimicrobials on both bacteria and MGEC (Didier & Kessel, Reference Didier and Kessel2004; Fitzgerald et al. Reference Fitzgerald, Meade, McEvoy, Lillis, Murphy, Machugh and Baird2007). Thus, a simple in-vitro model applying BME-UV cells as a substrate, Staphylococcus aureus isolates as challenge and tylosin as treatment was developed. Staph. aureus is the major contagious pathogen worldwide (Zecconi & Piccinini, Reference Zecconi, Piccinini, Kaske, Scholz and Holtershinken2002; Zecconi, Reference Zecconi2007) and it can adhere and invade MGEC (Lammers et al. Reference Lammers, Nuijten, Kruijt, Stockhofe-Zurwieden, Vecht, Smith and van Zijderveld1999; Dego et al. Reference Dego, van Dijk and Nederbragt2002). Macrolides are antimicrobials characterized by having a 12- to 16-member lactone ring and they are classified according to the number of atoms of the ring. Tylosin is a natural macrolide of the 16-ring class, isolated from Streptomyces fradiae, and it is a weak base and highly soluble in lipids. Macrolides such as tylosin inhibit protein synthesis by binding to 50S ribosomal subunits and are bacteriostatic (Giguere, Reference Giguere, Giguere, Prescott, Baggot, Walker and Dowling2007). Macrolides penetrate the cellular membrane and accumulate within the cells, as shown also for tylosin (Scorneaux & Shryock, Reference Scorneaux and Shryock1999). There is increasing evidence of their anti-inflammatory and immunomodulating properties, at least for the molecules used in human medicine (Zalewska-Kaszubska & Gorska, Reference Zalewska-Kaszubska and Gorska2001; Labro, Reference Labro2004a,Reference Labrob; López-Boado & Rubin, Reference López-Boado and Rubin2008). Among macrolides, tylosin is one of the most used molecules for mastitis therapy both in lactation and in the drying-off period (Ziv, Reference Ziv1980b; Bolourchi et al. Reference Bolourchi, Hovareshti and Tabatabayi1995; Zecconi et al. Reference Zecconi, Piccinini and Guarini1999; Bonnier et al. Reference Bonnier, Dore, Amedeo and Guerin-Faublee2006). Some information on the interactions between tylosin and leucocytes is available, but not for other macrolides used in mastitis therapy (Zecconi et al. Reference Zecconi, Piccinini, Bronzo and Casula1996; Chin et al. Reference Chin, Lee, Murrin, Morck, Merrill, Dick and Buret2000; Zecconi & Piccinini, Reference Zecconi and Piccinini2001; Cao et al. Reference Cao, Dong, Shen, Wu, Wu, Du, Wang, Qi and Li2006). Based on this information we selected tylosin to assess its potential activities on Staph. aureus-infected MGEC.

The aim of this paper was to assess the potential effects of antimicrobials on the immune system when invading bacteria are present, by applying a simple experimental model based on the BME-UV cell line, Staph. aureus as a challenge and a macrolide as antimicrobial. The BME-UV cell line was selected because it expresses immunological and inflammatory molecules; Staph. aureus because it is an intra- and extra-cellular mastitis pathogen and tylosin because it has an intra- and extra-cellular activity against Gram-positive mastitis pathogens.

Materials and Methods

Bacteria characteristics

Ten Staph. aureus isolates from subclinical mastitis cases in dairy cows of different herds were considered. Isolates were selected from our strain collection based on their genetic characteristics and antimicrobial susceptibility. Indeed, they have different virulence gene patterns (efb, spa, cna) and leukocidin genes (pvl, hla, lukDE, lukM) as described elsewhere (Zecconi et al. Reference Zecconi, Binda, Borromeo and Piccinini2005; Zecconi et al. Reference Zecconi, Cesaris, Liandris, Daprà and Piccinini2006). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for tylosin was assessed for each isolate by means of the agar dilution method following the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (NCCLS, 2000; NCCLS, 2002). Tylosin for these assays and for the experiment was provided by Elanco, Eli Lilly (Italy).

Epithelial cells

A clonal cell line (BME-UV) established from udder primary epithelial cell synthesizing several milk components (Zavizion et al. Reference Zavizion, van Duffelen, Schaeffer and Politis1996) was used as an in-vitro model. Previous reports show that this cell line can express several cytokines when stimulated by bacteria or toxins (Didier & Kessel, Reference Didier and Kessel2004; Fitzgerald et al. Reference Fitzgerald, Meade, McEvoy, Lillis, Murphy, Machugh and Baird2007).

Experimental design

BME-UV cells were exposed to different Staph. aureus isolates in the logarithmic growth phase at a final concentration of 105 CFU, assessed spectrophotometrically, and incubated in a CO2 incubator at 37°C for 2 h to allow cell invasion by bacteria. Each isolate was assessed separately. Then, tylosin at a concentration of 1/3 of the MIC (1/3×), the MIC (1×) and 3-times the MIC (3×) of the respective isolate, was added to the infected cell line and incubated at 37°C for 14 h in a CO2 incubator. The antimicrobial was used at different concentrations to assess the presence of a dose-dependent effect and the influence of viable bacteria count. At the end of the incubation time, supernatant and cells were collected to assess bacteria count and for biochemical and molecular assays.

Sample preparation

At the end of the incubation period cell monolayer supernatants were pipetted into sterile plastic tubes and 1000 μl used for bacteria counts, while 1000 μl was stored at −20°C for biochemical assays. To lyse extracellular bacteria, 40 μl of lysostaphin (Sigma-Aldrich, Italy) in 500 μl of HBSS (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy) was added to each sample and incubated at 37°C for 30 min to destroy Staph. aureus adhering to cells. Then, the cell monolayer was trypsinized and the cell suspension was centrifuged at 700 g for 10 min. Pellet samples used for cytokine assays were stored at −80°C, while pellet samples used for enzyme assays and bacteria counts were suspended in 500 μl of saline solution and stored at −20°C.

Bacteria count

Extracellular and intracellular Staph. aureus counts were performed by the standard dilution method. One-hundred μl of sample dilutions (up to 10−3) were plated on blood agar plates and incubated at 37°C for 18 h.

Cytokine assays

Total RNA was extracted from cells with RNAqueos kit (Ambion Inc., Austin TX, USA), while reverse transcription was performed with Quanti Tect kit (Qiagen, D). Real-time PCR systems for bovine GAPDH and the cytokines were run in triplicate with probes described in Table 1 and commercially available master mix for Sybr green (Power Sybr Green Master Mix, Applied Biosystems, Foster City CA, USA). Real-time Q-RT-PCRs were performed by using the Opticon 2 detection system (BioRad, Milan, Italy) and expression rate was calculated with Rest 2005 software (Pfaffl et al. Reference Pfaffl, Horgan and Dempfle2002). Cytokine expression was assessed as expression rate compared with a reference represented by BME-UV cells not exposed to Staph. aureus and not treated with tylosin. A preliminary trial showed that without bacterial challenge and in the presence of tylosin, changes in cytokine expression rates were not detectable. Therefore, a unchallenged tylosin-treated sample was not included in the experiment.

Table 1. Description of primer used in amplification of bovine GAPDH gene and cytokine genes

Designed from NM_174088 Bos taurus sequence

Biochemical assays

Lysozyme (LYZ) was assessed in duplicate by a fluorescence-based procedure (EnzChek Lysozyme Kit, Invitrogen, Carlsbad CA, USA). The method is based on lysis of Micrococcus lysodeycticus labelled with fluorescine to such a degree that fluorescence is quenched. LYZ activity is measured by changes of fluorescence on a microplate fluorimeter at 355 nm exc and 460 nm em (Ascent, Thermo Labsystem, FL) against a standard curve obtained for each test with a range of 8–500 units. One unit of LYZ is defined as the quantity of enzyme that produces a decrease in turbidity of 0·0001 OD units per min at 450 nm measured at pH 7·0 (25·8°C) using 0·3 mg/ml. NAGase (NAG) was assessed in duplicate by the procedure described by Kitchen et al. (Reference Kitchen, Middleton and Salmon1978) and expressed as units (pmol of 4-methylubelliferon released per min at 25·8°C catalysed by 1 ml of milk) on a microplate fluorimeter at 355 nm exc and 460 nm em (Ascent, Thermo Labsystem, FL).

Statistical analysis

Staph. aureus virulence patterns were clustered by the UPGAMA method and clusters were defined by the presence of a relatedness <80% between isolates as described by Piccinini et al. (Reference Piccinini, Cesaris, Daprà, Borromeo, Picozzi, Secchi and Zecconi2008).

Statistical analysis on response variables was performed by GLM procedure of SAS software (SAS rel 9.2, Cary NC, USA) with bacteria counts, cytokine expression rates and enzyme concentrations as response variables and treatment, bacteria and virulence factors clusters as independent variables.

Results

MIC values of Staph. aureus isolates were in the range 0·625–5·0 mg/l. All the isolates were positive for hla gene, while for the other genes different patterns were observed. However, statistical analysis did not show any significant influence of isolates on the response variables. Therefore, they were not considered further.

Antibacterial activity

All Staph. aureus isolates were found intracellularly, independently of the exposure to antimicrobial treatment. Analysis of antimicrobial activity measured in the supernatant of the cell cultures (Table 2) showed a numerical linear decrease of bacteria concentration as tylosin concentration increased, with significant differences among 1/3× and the other two treatment levels (1× and 3×).

Table 2. Extracellular and intracellular Staphylococcus aureus mean counts (±sd) of BME-UV cells exposed to different levels of tylosin (see text for details of concentrations) for 14 h

Mean values in a row with different letters are statistically different (P<0·05)

The same pattern was observed for intracellular killing of Staph. aureus (Table 2) with an increasing killing rate as tylosin concentration increased. Differences among treatment groups were always significant (P<0·05).

Cytokine expression

Analysis of IL-1 expression rate (Table 3) showed a significant reduction of IL-1 in tylosin-treated samples when compared with the untreated sample, without any significant difference among treatment groups.

Table 3. Relative mean expression rate (±sd) of cytokines in BME-UV cells exposed to Staphylococcus aureus and to different levels of tylosin (see text for details) compared with untreated and unexposed controls

Mean values in a row with different letters are statistically different (P<0·05)

Analogously, the expression rates observed for IL-6 (Table 3) were significantly (P<0·05) reduced in tylosin-treated cells when compared with matching untreated controls, with significant differences among treatment groups.

When TNF expression rate was considered (Table 3) the pattern observed was reversed in comparison with IL-1 and IL-6 with rather small increases of expression rates in treated samples, in comparison with untreated controls. However, none of the differences observed was statistically significant. The same pattern was observed for IL-8 (Table 3) but with a large increase of expression rate in treated samples, without significant differences.

Lysosomal enzymes

When lysosomal enzymes were considered, a significant increase (P<0·05) in intracellular NAG (Table 4) was observed in tylosin-treated cells, when compared with untreated control. However, no differences were observed among treatment groups. Extracellular NAG values were much lower than intracellular ones and without significant differences among groups.

Table 4. Mean intracellular and extracellular concentration (±sd) of NAGase and lysozyme in BME-UV cells exposed to Staphylococcus aureus and to different levels of tylosin (see text for details)

Mean values in a row with different letters are statistically different (P<0·05)

Lysozyme concentration was significantly lower both intracellularly and extracellularly, when compared with untreated controls (Table 4). In both cases the differences between control and respective treatment groups were statistically significant, while significant differences among treatment groups were not observed.

Discussion

In the past, leucocytes were considered the main source of molecules involved in inflammatory and immunological responses. It has been shown that other cells could be an important source of inflammatory and immunological mediators. Indeed, lung epithelial cells could modulate the inflammatory response in the airways and modulate cell recruitment through producing chemokines, cytokines, receptors and adhesion molecules (López-Boado & Rubin, Reference López-Boado and Rubin2008). Similarly, udder epithelial cells could produce both cytokines and immunomodulating molecules (Didier & Kessel, Reference Didier and Kessel2004; Rainard & Riollet, Reference Rainard and Riollet2006; Fitzgerald et al. Reference Fitzgerald, Meade, McEvoy, Lillis, Murphy, Machugh and Baird2007; Piccinini et al. Reference Piccinini, Binda, Belotti, Daprà and Zecconi2007). Thus, the role of MGEC cannot be ignored in performing mastitis pathogenesis and therapy studies, and particularly when the interactions between bacteria and host are of interest.

Antimicrobials are still the most used tool to control and cure clinical and subclinical mastitis worldwide, and their efficacy is usually associated with their direct effect on bacteria. However, the efficacy of antimicrobial therapy for mastitis should not only be related to direct antimicrobial activities but also to its interactions with the host immune system. This is particularly true when bovine mastitis treatment is considered, because the quantity and the length of the treatments are respectively lower and shorter than optimal levels, to limit the cost of the treatment and milk withdrawal time (Ziv, Reference Ziv1980a; Wagner & Erskine, Reference Wagner, Erskine, Giguere, Prescott and Desmond Baggot2006).

Although there are plenty of papers on antimicrobial activity in mastitis treatment very few addressed the interactions with the immune system (Nickerson et al. Reference Nickerson, Paape and Dulin1985; Zecconi et al. Reference Zecconi, Piccinini, Bronzo and Casula1996; Hoeben et al. Reference Hoeben, Burvenich and Heynemann1997; Zecconi & Piccinini, Reference Zecconi and Piccinini2001). These kinds of studies are indeed difficult and expensive; thus, the availability of in-vitro models to assess both the interactions between bacteria and epithelial cells and the immune/inflammatory response could be helpful to assess in a holistic way antimicrobial activity. We applied an in-vitro model, designed to mimic as closely as possible what happens in a mammary gland when a new infection occurs and milk leucocytes are few and not activated. Therefore, MGEC were used as a substrate, different Staph. aureus isolates able to invade cells represented the challenge and the incubation time of 14 h resembles the interval between milkings, when both bacteria grow and antimicrobial works. In this model a macrolide, tylosin, was used as a prototype to assess interactions of antimicrobials with MGEC because macrolides are known to be active both intra- and extra-cellularly and to have immune/anti-inflammatory effects in man.

All the Staph. aureus isolates were shown to be able to invade epithelial cells in a very short time and to multiply, even when a sub-optimal dose of antimicrobial was applied. An influence of isolate characteristics on cellular response to the invasion and on antimicrobial treatment was expected, but the statistical analysis did not show any significant results. These unexpected results could be explained by the relatively high dose of inoculum used (105 CFU) or by a weak relationship between virulence pattern considered to classify isolates and their competence to invade cells.

The present results confirmed that tylosin had no effects on cell viability and functions. Moreover, a statistically significant antimicrobial activity against both intracellular and extracellular Staph. aureus in BME-UV cells was observed, confirming previous data on milk leucocytes (Zecconi et al. Reference Zecconi, Piccinini, Bronzo and Casula1996). Therefore, our data suggest that when intracellular bacteria are involved, antimicrobials with intracellular activity could be helpful in improving bacteria clearance.

Previous studies show that macrolides, including tylosin can have an anti-inflammatory/immunomodulating effect by inhibiting the prostanoid pathway and by down-regulating pro-inflammatory cytokines production, such as TNF, IL-1, IL-6, 6-keto-PGF1a, and NO (Ianaro et al. Reference Ianaro, Ialenti, Maffia, Sautebin, Rombola, Carnuccio, Iuvone, D'Acquisto and Di Rosa2000; Cao et al. Reference Cao, Dong, Shen, Wu, Wu, Du, Wang, Qi and Li2006). In our study, we observed a significant down-regulation of IL-1 and IL-6, while TNF and Il-8 expression rates numerically increased, but differences were not significant. Previous studies were performed using mainly leucocytes, and observing these effects also in epithelial cells supports the presence of the anti-inflammatory/immunomodulating activity of tylosin. It is worth noticing that the absence of a down-regulation of chemotactic chemokine IL-8, which would affect the cellular response, can be considered a positive outcome.

To our knowledge, this is the first paper assessing the concentration of two lysosomal enzymes, lysozyme and NAGase, in Staph. aureus-stimulated MGEC. Even though both enzymes have a similar substrate as a specific target for their activity, the results obtained suggest different secretion mechanisms. This was not completely unexpected because differences were also observed in NAG and LYZ concentrations in bovine milk of healthy animals (Piccinini et al. Reference Piccinini, Binda, Belotti, Daprà and Zecconi2007). In the present study, extracellular NAG levels were not affected by treatment, but a significant increase was observed intracellularly. Both intracellular and extracellular LYZ levels were significantly decreased in tylosin-treated cells, without differences among treatment group. Both enzymes have acetyl-glucosamine as a target. This molecule is a component of bacterial cell walls, but it is also heavily involved in several biochemical pathways in Golgi apparatus and lysosomes (Cooper & Hausman, Reference Cooper and Hausman2007). It is well known that LYZ activity plays a role in the host immune defences by killing ingested bacteria in the phagolysosomes and by the control of colonization through exocytosis (Zecconi & Smith, Reference Zecconi and Smith2003). In this latter case, the killing activity is related to the damage of bacteria cell walls rich in acetyl-glucosamine, and to other enzymic means not yet completely investigated (Ganz, Reference Ganz2004). NAGase is a glycosidase known to be produced in tubular epithelial cells. In this latter case, tubular dysfunction led to an increased release of this enzyme, and therefore, it is considered as a marker of inflammation in kidney diseases (Bazzi et al. Reference Bazzi, Petrini, Rizza, Arrigo, Napodano, Paparella and D'Amico2002). It is also detectable in milk and its levels are correlated with stage of lactation in healthy cows (Piccinini et al. Reference Piccinini, Binda, Belotti, Daprà and Zecconi2007) or inflammation (Kitchen et al. Reference Kitchen, Seng Kwee, Middleton and Andrews1984). The patterns observed in the present study support the suggestion that this enzyme is much more involved in intracellular biochemical pathways (Cooper & Hausman, Reference Cooper and Hausman2007) than in a direct antibacterial activity, even if its release could be enhanced by cellular dysfunctional status (Bazzi et al. Reference Bazzi, Petrini, Rizza, Arrigo, Napodano, Paparella and D'Amico2002) or bacterial stimuli (Kelly & Carchman, Reference Kelly and Carchman1987).

The different concentration pattern of the two enzymes confirms that tylosin treatment reduces the inflammatory response, as suggested by the significant decrease of LYZ, without affecting cell functionality and integrity, as suggested by the absence of extracellular NAG and by the increase of intracellular NAG, which was probably induced by bacterial stimuli (Kelly & Carchman, Reference Kelly and Carchman1987).

The results of this study show that low levels of tylosin could have a significant influence on immune and inflammatory molecules expression and concentrations as suggested by the presence of these activities at sub-optimal therapeutical levels and by the absence of any linear relationship among these parameters, tylosin concentrations and bacteria counts.

Conclusions

Successful mastitis cure is the result of achieving the optimal efficiency of both innate immune defences and therapeutic activity, by means of killing bacteria without eliciting an excessive inflammatory response. Therefore, antimicrobials for mastitis therapy should be selected not only on the basis of bacterial sensitivity, but also for their positive interaction with the innate immune response of the mammary gland. This study showed that an in-vitro model based on Staph. aureus challenge on MGEC could be helpful in assessing the interactions between invading bacteria and cells, intracellular/extracellular activity of antimicrobials and the influence of these latter on epithelial cell immune and inflammatory response.

References

Bazzi, C, Petrini, C, Rizza, V, Arrigo, G, Napodano, P, Paparella, M & D'Amico, G 2002 Urinary N-acetyl-beta-glucosaminidase excretion is a marker of tubular cell dysfunction and a predictor of outcome in primary glomerulonephritis. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 17 18901896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolourchi, M, Hovareshti, P & Tabatabayi, AH 1995 Comparison of the effects of local and systemic dry cow therapy for staphylococcal mastitis control. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 25 6367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnier, M, Dore, C, Amedeo, J & Guerin-Faublee, V 2006 In vitro activity of tylosin and tilmicosin against cocci isolated from bovine mastitis. Revue De Medecine Veterinaire 157 486489Google Scholar
Burton, JL & Erskine, RJ 2003 Immunity and mastitis—some new ideas for an old disease. Veterinary Clinics of North America—Food Animal Practice 19 145CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cao, XY, Dong, M, Shen, JZ, Wu, BB, Wu, CM, Du, XD, Wang, Z, Qi, YT & Li, BY 2006 Tilmicosin and tylosin have anti-inflammatory properties via modulation of COX-2 and iNOS gene expression and production of cytokines in LPS-induced macrophages and monocytes. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 27 431438CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chin, AC, Lee, WD, Murrin, KA, Morck, DW, Merrill, JK, Dick, P & Buret, AG 2000 Tilmicosin induces apoptosis in bovine peripheral neutrophils in the presence or in the absence of Pasteurella haemolytica and promotes neutrophil phagocytosis by macrophages. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 44 24652470CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, GM & Hausman, RE 2007 The Cell: A Molecular Approach. Washington DC, USA: ASM PressGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dego, OK, van Dijk, JE & Nederbragt, H 2002 Factors involved in the early pathogenesis of bovine Staphylococcus aureus mastitis with emphasis on bacterial adhesion and invasion: a review. Veterinary Quarterly 24 181198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Didier, A & Kessel, S 2004 Novel in-vitro co-culture system for studies on leukocyte-mammary gland epithelial cell cross-talk. Milchwissenschaft-Milk Science International 59 236239Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, DC, Meade, KG, McEvoy, AN, Lillis, L, Murphy, EP, Machugh, DE & Baird, AW 2007 Tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) increases nuclear factor kappaB (NFkappaB) activity in and interleukin-8 (IL-8) release from bovine mammary epithelial cells. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 116 5968CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ganz, T 2004 Antimicrobial polypeptides. Journal of Leukocyte Biology 75 3438CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giguere, S 2007 Macrolides, azalides and ketolides. In: Antimicrobial Therapy in Veterinary Medicine (Eds Giguere, S, Prescott, JF, Baggot, JD, Walker, RD & Dowling, PM) p. 626. Hoboken NJ, USA: Wiley-BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Hoeben, D, Burvenich, C & Heynemann, R 1997 Influence of antimicrobial agents on bactericidal activity of bovine polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 56 271282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ianaro, A, Ialenti, A, Maffia, P, Sautebin, L, Rombola, L, Carnuccio, R, Iuvone, T, D'Acquisto, F & Di Rosa, M 2000 Anti-inflammatory activity of macrolide antibiotics. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 292 156163Google ScholarPubMed
Kelly, BA & Carchman, RA 1987 The relationship between lysosomal enzyme release and protein phosphorylation in human monocytes stimulated by phorbol esters and opsonized zymosan. Journal of Biological Chemistry 262 1740417411CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitchen, BJ, Middleton, G & Salmon, M 1978 Bovine milk N-acetyl-beta-d-glucosaminidase and its significance in the detection of abnormal udder secretions. Journal of Dairy Research 45 1520CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitchen, BJ, Seng Kwee, W, Middleton, G & Andrews, RJ 1984 Relationship between the level of N-acetyl-β-d-glucodaminidase (NAGase) in bovine milk and the presence of mastitis pathogens. Journal of Dairy Research 51 1116CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Labro, MT 2004a Cellular and molecular effects of macrolides on leukocyte function. Current Pharmaceutical Design 10 30673080CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Labro, MT 2004b Macrolide antibiotics: current and future uses. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 5 541550CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lammers, A, Nuijten, PJM, Kruijt, E, Stockhofe-Zurwieden, N, Vecht, U, Smith, HE & van Zijderveld, FG 1999 Cell tropism of Staphylococcus aureus in bovine mammary gland cell cultures. Veterinary Microbiology 67 7789CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leutenegger, CM, Alluwaimi, AM, Smith, WL, Perani, L & Cullor, JS 2000 Quantitation of bovine cytokine mRNA in milk cells of healthy cattle by real-time TaqMan® polymerase chain reaction. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 77 275287CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
López-Boado, YS & Rubin, BK 2008 Macrolides as immunomodulatory medications for the therapy of chronic lung diseases. Current Opinion in Pharmacology 8 286291CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NCCLS 2000 Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard. In: NCCLS document M7-A5 5th Edition, p. 36. Wayne PA, USA: NCCLSGoogle Scholar
NCCLS 2002 Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals; approved standard – second edition, NCCLS document M31-A2. In: NCCLS document M31-A2 2nd Edition, p. 86. Wayne PA, USA: NCCLSGoogle Scholar
Nickerson, SC, Paape, MJ & Dulin, AM 1985 Effect of antibiotics and vehicles on bovine polymorphonuclear leukocyte morphologic features, variability and phagocytic activity in vitro. American Journal of Veterinary Research 46 22592265Google Scholar
Pfaffl, MW, Horgan, GW & Dempfle, L 2002 Relative expression software tool (REST (c)) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR. Nucleic Acids Research 30 112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piccinini, R, Binda, E, Belotti, M, Daprà, V & Zecconi, A 2007 Evaluation of milk components during whole lactation in healthy quarters. Journal of Dairy Research 74 226232CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piccinini, R, Cesaris, L, Daprà, V, Borromeo, V, Picozzi, C, Secchi, C & Zecconi, A 2008 The role of teat skin contamination in the epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus intramammary infections. Journal of Dairy Research 76 3641CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rainard, P & Riollet, C 2006 Innate immunity of the bovine mammary gland. Veterinary Research 37 369400CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scorneaux, B & Shryock, TR 1999 Intracellular accumulation, subcellular distribution and efflux of tilmicosin in bovine mammary, blood and lung ells. Journal of Dairy Science 82 12021212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, S & Erskine, RJ 2006 Antimicrobial drug use in bovine mastitis. In: Antimicrobial Therapy in Veterinary Medicine (Eds Giguere, S, Prescott, JF & Desmond Baggot, J). Ames IA, USA: Iowa University PressGoogle Scholar
Zalewska-Kaszubska, J & Gorska, D 2001 Anti-inflammatory capabilities of macrolides. Pharmacological Research 44 451454CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zavizion, B, van Duffelen, M, Schaeffer, W & Politis, I 1996 Establishment and characterization of a bovine mammary epithelial cell line with unique properties. In Vitro Cell Development Biology Animal 32 138148CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zecconi, A 2007 Contagious mastitis control. FIL-IDF Bulletin 416 3440Google Scholar
Zecconi, A, Binda, E, Borromeo, V & Piccinini, R 2005 Relationship between some Staphylococcus aureus pathogenic factors and growth rates or somatic cell counts. Journal of Dairy Research 72 203208CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zecconi, A, Cesaris, L, Liandris, E, Daprà, V & Piccinini, R 2006 Role of several Staphylococcus aureus virulence factors on the inflammatory response in bovine mammary gland. Microbial Pathogenesis 40 177183CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zecconi, A & Piccinini, R 2001 Efficacy of tylosin when administered during the drying-off period for the prevention and treatment of intramammary infections. In: 3rd Middle-European Congress for Buiatrics, pp. 97–100. Nove Mesto Check Rep 24–25/05/01: The Czech Association for BuiatricsGoogle Scholar
Zecconi, A & Piccinini, R 2002 Intramammary infections: epidemiology and diagnosis. In: XXII World Buiatric Congress— Recent developments and perspectives in bovine medicine, Hannover 18–23/08/2002 pp. 346359. Eds Kaske, M, Scholz, H & Holtershinken, MGoogle Scholar
Zecconi, A, Piccinini, R, Bronzo, V & Casula, A 1996 Intracellular penetration of tylosin: influence on phagocytic activity and intracellular killing of Staph.aureus. In: World Buiatric Congress, Vol. 19, pp. 241243. Edinburgh 8–12 July 1996Google Scholar
Zecconi, A, Piccinini, R & Guarini, CPB 1999 Tylosin in cows in the dry period. Obiettivi e Documenti Veterinari 20 4954Google Scholar
Zecconi, A & Smith, KL 2003 Ruminant Mammary Gland Immunity. Bruxelles: FIL-IDFGoogle Scholar
Ziv, G 1980a Drug selection and use in mastitis: systemic vs local therapy. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 176 11091115Google ScholarPubMed
Ziv, G 1980b Practical pharmacokinetic aspects of mastitis therapy–2: practical & therapeutic applications. Veterinary Medicine Small Animal Clinics 75 469474Google ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Description of primer used in amplification of bovine GAPDH gene and cytokine genes

Figure 1

Table 2. Extracellular and intracellular Staphylococcus aureus mean counts (±sd) of BME-UV cells exposed to different levels of tylosin (see text for details of concentrations) for 14 h

Figure 2

Table 3. Relative mean expression rate (±sd) of cytokines in BME-UV cells exposed to Staphylococcus aureus and to different levels of tylosin (see text for details) compared with untreated and unexposed controls

Figure 3

Table 4. Mean intracellular and extracellular concentration (±sd) of NAGase and lysozyme in BME-UV cells exposed to Staphylococcus aureus and to different levels of tylosin (see text for details)