Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-hxdxx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-16T16:14:12.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gendered Space and Middle East Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2014

Aseel Sawalha
Aseel Sawalha*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Fordham University, New York, N.Y.; e-mail: asawalha@fordham.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Aspects of space and place shape daily life, social structures, politics, and intimate relations among people. In the late 1980s and 1990s, anthropologists, geographers, and sociologists—influenced by the writings of Michel Foucault and Henri Lefebvre on the meaning of social space—started to highlight the spatial in their analysis of social phenomena. These scholars focused on the production of urban space and asserted that space is dynamic and often shaped by the needs of its users as well as by those who design it. With the exception of Setha Low's work on Latin America, these writings were mostly centered on the United States.

Type
Roundtable
Information
International Journal of Middle East Studies , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 166 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Aspects of space and place shape daily life, social structures, politics, and intimate relations among people. In the late 1980s and 1990s, anthropologists, geographers, and sociologists—influenced by the writings of Michel Foucault and Henri LefebvreFootnote 1 on the meaning of social space—started to highlight the spatial in their analysis of social phenomena.Footnote 2 These scholars focused on the production of urban space and asserted that space is dynamic and often shaped by the needs of its users as well as by those who design it. With the exception of Setha Low's work on Latin America, these writings were mostly centered on the United States.

Influenced by this theoretical framework, scholars conducting research on the cities of the Middle East and North Africa have delved into issues of space and place. These studies have analyzed public and private spaces, and questioned the dichotomy between the two, from the old suqs to the recent gated communities. Analyzing the spatial was not completely new in Middle East studies; earlier Orientalist writings had presented the region as unique in the way that social space was divided and lived. These writings (mostly authored by European male scholars) viewed social space as rigidly divided between men and women.Footnote 3 Because of male scholars’ preoccupation with women's “prohibited spaces,” which they could not observe or access, they failed to see the ways in which social spaces were divided by other markers, such as class, the kind of activities taking place in them, or rural, urban, and nomadic differences. The Arab elites’ urban gendered spaces became the main framework of analysis of Arab and Islamic societies. Spaces where men and women coexisted—for example, open spaces in rural agricultural areas where women worked alongside men or the mixed spaces of nomadic communities where gender segregation was not practiced—were left unmentioned.Footnote 4

Building on the critique of Orientalist writings, a new strand of scholarly work on issues of gendered space has emerged in the past twenty years, much of it written by women scholars from the region.Footnote 5 These writings join emerging theories of the production of social space with feminist applications of space theoryFootnote 6 while responding to the myopic stereotypical representation of Muslim women in earlier Orientalist writings. Through participant observation and engagement with people using private spaces, women scholars have closely described and analyzed the private sphere of women, challenging the trope that Muslim women are the victims of a patriarchal system and instead presenting them as capable agents who have some control of their own space.Footnote 7 These writings have centered on agency in the private sphere and on the lives of women in the public domain. The work of Saba Mahmood on women and mosques in Egypt, Deborah Kapchan on women performers in the marketplace in Morocco, and Lara Deeb on the women of Hizbullah in Lebanon are examples of the recent emphasis on women's engagement and presence in the public sphere.Footnote 8 Although these anthropological studies focus on women who have managed to carve a place for themselves outside the private space of the house, they have centered on the lives and experiences of a specific tier: underprivileged and/or religious women. There is still a need for research that addresses the experiences of women who are secular, visible, enfranchised, and present in the public sphere.

Space has been drastically rearranged in major Arab cities in the aftermath of the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq and the recent uprisings known as the Arab Spring. Within these social movements, urban space has emerged as a central theme, manifesting issues of gender along the way. In Tunisia, Egypt, and Yemen, thousands to million of citizens have gathered and camped in public squares to protest collectively and demand regime change. The revived public square as a stage for political action has politicized the associations and meaning of familiar locations and altered the symbolic significance of city landmarks.

Women have been active participants in recent political protests and public assemblies in the streets. In Tunisia and Egypt, young middle-class women were visible in the public sphere during the 2011 uprisings; it is believed that a young college-educated woman initiated the call for public protest in Cairo.Footnote 9 The recent currents of scholarship on gender and space offer a promising starting point for thinking about women's surge into contemporary public national activism, about the reactionary response of violence and repression against them by official security forces and self-appointed gender police, and about the subsequent outcry by women and men against gender repression.

References

NOTES

1 Foucault, Michel, “Of Other Spaces,” Diacritics 26 (1986): 22–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lefebvre, Henri, The Production of Space, trans. Nicholson-Smith, Donald (Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell, 1991)Google Scholar.

2 For anthropological and geographical writings that theorize space, see Harvey, David, “Between Space and Time: Reflections on the Geographical Imagination,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 80 (1990): 418–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Low, Setha, “Embodied Space(s): Anthropological Theories of Body, Space and Culture,” Space and Culture 6 (2003): 9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, “Spatializing Culture: The Social Production and Social Construction of Public Space in Costa Rica,” American Ethnologist 23 (1996): 861–79; Smith, Neil, The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City (London and New York: Routledge, 1996)Google Scholar; and Soja, Edward, Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory (London and New York: Verso, 1989)Google Scholar.

3 For excellent critiques of Orientalist writings, see Alloula, Malek, The Colonial Harem (Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press, 1986)Google Scholar; and Kabbani, Rana, Europe's Myth of the Orient (Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press, 1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 For scholarly works presenting cases where women are in control of their own spaces and/or access both public and private spaces, see Abu-Lughod, Lila, “Dialects of Women's Empowerment: The International Circuitry of the Arab Human Development Report 2005,” International Journal of Middle East Studies 41 (2009): 83–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, “Orientalism and Middle East Feminist Studies,” Feminist Studies 27 (2001): 101–13; Afsaruddin, Asma, Hermeneutics and Honor: Negotiating Female “Public” Space in Islamic/ate Societies (Boston, Mass.: Harvard Center for Middle East Studies, 1999)Google Scholar; Ahmed, Leila, “Western Ethnocentrism and Perceptions of the Harem,” Feminist Studies 8 (1982): 521–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, Women and Gender in Islam: Historical Roots of a Modern Debate (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1992); Kanaaneh, Rhoda, Birthing the Nation: Strategies of Palestinian Women in Israel (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 2002)Google Scholar; Khan, Shahnaz, “Muslim Women: Negotiations in the Third Space,” Signs 23 (1998): 463–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Raymond, Andre, “Islamic City, Arab City: Orientalist Myths and Recent Views,” British Journal of Middle East Studies 21 (1994): 3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 For example, see Abaza, Mona, “Shopping Malls, Consumer Culture and the Reshaping of Public Space in Egypt,” Theory, Culture & Society 18, no. 5 (2011): 97–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ghannam, Farha, Remaking the Modern in a Global Cairo: Space, Relocation, and the Politics of Identity (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 2002)Google Scholar; Oncu, Ayse and Weyland, Petra, Space, Culture and Power: New Identities in Globalizing Cities (London: Zed Books, 1997)Google Scholar; and Secor, Anna J., “Toward a Feminist Counter-geopolitics: Gender, Space and Islamist Politics in Istanbul,” Space & Polity 5 (2011): 191–211Google Scholar.

6 Massey, Doreen, Space, Place and Gender (Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press, 1994)Google Scholar; McDowell, Linda, “Space, Place and Gender Relations: Part II. Identity, Difference, Feminist Geometries and Geographies,” Progress in Human Geography 17 (1993): 305–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Falah, Ghazi and Flint, Colin, “Geopolitical Spaces: The Dialectic of Public and Private Space in the Palestine-Israel Conflict,” The Arab World Geographer 7 (2004): 117–34Google Scholar; Ghannam, Farha, Remaking the Modern: Space, Relocation and the Politics of Identity in a Global Cairo (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 2002)Google Scholar; Golley, Nawar Al-Hassan, “Is Feminism Relevant to Arab Women?,” Third World Quarterly 25 (2004): 521–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Joseph, Suad, “The Public/Private: The Imagined Boundary in the Imagined Nation/State/Community: The Lebanese Case,” Feminist Review 57 (1997): 73–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Peteet, Julie, Landscape of Hope and Despair: Palestinian Refugee Camps (Philadelphia, Pa.: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Thompson, Elizabeth, “Public and Private in Middle Eastern Women's History,” Journal of Women's History 15 (2003): 52–69Google Scholar.

8 Deeb, Lara, An Enchanted Modern: Gender and Public Piety in Shiʿi Lebanon (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2006)Google Scholar; Kapchan, Deborah, Gender on the Market: Moroccan Women and the Revoicing of Tradition (Philadelphia, Pa.: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mahmood, Saba, Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2005)Google Scholar; Ennaji, Fatima Sadiqi and Moha, “The Feminization of Public Space: Women's Activism, the Family Law, and Social Change in Morocco,” Journal of Middle East Women's Studies 2 (2006): 86–114Google Scholar.

9 De Souzam, Macelo Lopez and Lipietz, Barbara, “The ‘Arab Spring’ and the City: Hopes, Contradictions and Spatiality,” City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action 15 (2011): 618–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hafez, Sherine, “No Longer a Bargain: Women, Masculinity, and the Egyptian Uprising,” American Ethnologist 39 (2012): 37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, An Islam of Her Own: Reconsidering Religion and Secularism in Women's Islamic Movements (New York: New York University Press, 2011); Hamdy, Sherine, “Strength and Vulnerability after Egypt's Arab Spring Uprising,” American Ethnologist 39 (2012): 43–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hirschkind, Charles, “Beyond Secular and Religious: An Intellectual Genealogy of Tahrir Square,” American Ethnologist 39 (2012): 49–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Winegar, Jessica, “The Privilege of Revolution: Gender, Class, Space, and Affect in Cairo,” American Ethnologist 39 (2012): 67–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar.