As the civil war in Syria continues, some of the key actors have sought ways to reduce the conflict's toll on civilians.Footnote 1 In May, 2007, Russia and the United States began exploring the possibility of establishing “safe” or “de-escalation” zones.Footnote 2 On July 7, this dialogue yielded a trilateral agreement and memorandum signed by Russia, the United States, and Jordan to establish a ceasefire in southwest Syria.Footnote 3 The resulting ceasefire—the first in Syria signed by the Trump administration—governs hostilities between Syrian government forces and associated troops on one side and rebels on the other. It began on July 9.Footnote 4
The text of the agreement is confidential,Footnote 5 but Trump administration officials have described its key parameters. According to Brett McGurk, Special Presidential Envoy for the Global Coalition to Counter ISIS, the agreement is “essentially an undertaking to use our influence, the Jordanians, their influence, the Russians to use their influence with all of the sides of the conflict to stop the fighting, to essentially freeze the conflict.”Footnote 6 One significant feature of the ceasefire is that it divides the territory covered by the agreement into two areas, with United States-associated forces on one side and Syrian and Russian-associated forces on the other. According to McGurk:
… if you take the southwest, what we did there—and I think quite successfully—is a very painstaking negotiation with Jordan and with Russia and with us trilaterally to map out a very detailed—we call it a line of contact—between opposition and regime forces. And everybody agreed on that line of contact, and that is the ceasefire line.
This is the first time we have had a ceasefire with a very detailed negotiated line. It's a very different endeavor than just declaring a ceasefire in a particular area. So we have a very detailed, painstakingly negotiated ceasefire line.Footnote 7
McGurk described the agreement as “phase one” of de-escalating the Syrian civil war.Footnote 8 A Senior State Department Official elaborated on the description of the agreement as an “interim step”:
The idea is it should create a better environment to discuss a broader and more comprehensive southwest de-escalation area in greater detail. We felt that a ceasefire—near-term ceasefire—was important because the violence in the southwest, although historically, over the course of the conflict, it has been … less than other parts of Syria, the violence has steadily increased in the south since February, with both the Syrian regime and opposition defenses threatening to derail any potential for progress there … .
Now, the agreement … previews additional steps that we think we're going to have to take to strengthen and solidify that ceasefire, and those steps would include potential deployment of monitoring forces to the area, and as Secretary Tillerson noted, that's something that we're close to an understanding on but we're not in a position to announce in detail on that yet; and also formation of an effective monitoring cell, an arrangement by which the parties could participate and monitor the details of the ceasefire and violations.Footnote 9
The agreement did not address monitoring and compliance.Footnote 10 Shortly after the agreement was announced, Russia indicated its willingness to deploy monitors.Footnote 11 On August 23, the Jordanian Embassy announced that, as envisioned by the ceasefire agreement, the Amman Center for Ceasefire Control, with participation by representatives from Jordan, Russia, and the United States, started its official work to “monitor, stabilise, and deepen” the ceasefire.Footnote 12
Early reports indicate that the ceasefire has held. On July 14, Russian Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Maria Zakharova said that the situation on the ground was “steady” and noted that the ceasefire might “be an example for other areas in Idlib province.”Footnote 13 A month into the ceasefire, Department of State spokesperson Heather Nauert offered the following assessment of its progress:
[T]hat ceasefire, to my understanding, is still holding. Okay? We are pleased with that. That provides the United States and the coalition partners with the opportunity to start to get some humanitarian in—that is so badly needed in that area. And so … we've been able to start reaching some of the vulnerable Syrians without the complications of avoiding airstrikes or increases in violence. We're continuing to work with our international partners to assess the ongoing emergency humanitarian needs throughout Syria and facilitate the delivery of vitally needed supplies.
I'm also told that people are starting to slowly come back into parts of those areas, which … we would consider to be a moderate success at this point, and we look forward to that happening eventually.Footnote 14
On September 11, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov likewise described the ceasefire “successful.”Footnote 15