Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T12:39:47.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Description and phylogenetic analyses of ribosomal transcription units from species of Fasciolidae (Platyhelminthes: Digenea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2020

T.H. Le*
Affiliation:
Institute of Biotechnology (IBT), Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST), 18. Hoang Quoc Viet Rd, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam Graduate University of Science and Technology (GUST), Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST), 18. Hoang Quoc Viet Rd, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam
K.L.T. Pham
Affiliation:
Institute of Biotechnology (IBT), Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST), 18. Hoang Quoc Viet Rd, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam
H.T.T. Doan
Affiliation:
Institute of Biotechnology (IBT), Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST), 18. Hoang Quoc Viet Rd, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam Graduate University of Science and Technology (GUST), Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST), 18. Hoang Quoc Viet Rd, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam
T.K. Xuyen Le
Affiliation:
Institute of Biotechnology (IBT), Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST), 18. Hoang Quoc Viet Rd, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam
K.T. Nguyen
Affiliation:
Institute of Biotechnology (IBT), Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST), 18. Hoang Quoc Viet Rd, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam
S.P. Lawton
Affiliation:
Molecular Parasitology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University London, Kingston Upon Thames, SurreyKT12 2EE, UK
*
Author for correspondence: T.H. Le, E-mail: imibtvn@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many members of Fasciolidae are common trematodes in cattle, buffaloes, sheep, elephants, pigs, with some capable of infecting humans also. In this study, the complete or near-complete sequences of ribosomal transcription unit (rTU or rDNA), each of Fasciola hepatica (Australia), Fascioloides jacksoni (Sri Lanka), Fasciolopsis buski (Vietnam) and three isolates of F. gigantica (Vietnam), were obtained and characterized. The full length of rDNA for each F. hepatica, ‘hybrid’ Fasciola sp., Fas. jacksoni and Fa. Buski, was 7657 bp, 7966 bp, 7781 bp and 8361 bp, with the complete intergenic spacer region (IGS) (862 bp, 1170 bp, 987 bp and 561 bp), respectively. The rDNA of two ‘pure’ F. gigantica isolates from Vietnam was 6794 bp with unsequenced IGS. For 28S rRNA genes the Fasciola spp. are equal, 1958 bp for 18S, 160 bp for 5.8S, 3863 bp and 454 bp for ITS1 but ITS2 differ by one nucleotide (Thymine) (359 or 360 bp). The ITS1 of the sensu lato Fa. buski has some distinguishable features, 286 bp for ITS2, 3862 bp for 28S and four repeat units of 356–361 bp each found in ITS1. The 28S rDNA analysis showed the lowest level of divergence (0–0.57%) between F. hepatica and F. gigantica and higher (2.23–2.62%) and highest (6–6.42%) for Fas. jacksoni and Fasciolopsis, respectively. The tree of 43 strains/species clearly produced a well-supported phylogeny, where 18 fasciolids consistently grouped, forming a discrete Fasciolidae clade, distinct from Philophthalmidae, Echinostomatidae and Echinochasmidae in Echinostomatoidea. Fascioloides jacksoni is outside Fasciola spp.: basal with Fas. magna, as previously demonstrated.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

The family Fasciolidae Raillet, 1895 (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda) comprises six distinct genera including Fasciola, Fascioloides, Fasciolopsis, Tenuifasciola, Parafasciolopsis and Protofasciola, all of which predominantly parasitize ungulates across the globe (Mas-Coma et al., Reference Mas-Coma, Valero, Bargues, Toledo and Fried2019). The Fasciolodae are of interest as several species are zoonotic and of medical importance, including the closely related parasites of cattle and sheep, Fasciola hepatica Linnaeus, 1758, from Europe and Asia, and Fasciola gigantica Cobbold, 1855, from Africa and Asia (Le et al., Reference Le, De, Agatsuma, Nguyen, Nguyen, McManus and Blair2008; Mas-Coma et al., Reference Mas-Coma, Valero, Bargues, Toledo and Fried2019). Similarly, the intestinal fluke of pigs Fasciolopsis buski (sensu lato) Lankester, 1857 has also been shown to cause disease in humans in South-East Asia (Mas-Coma et al., Reference Mas-Coma, Valero, Bargues, Toledo and Fried2019). This family of flukes is also renowned for its impact on wildlife and importance in conservation, especially Fascioloides magna Ward, 1917, which is predominantly a fluke of North American deer populations but has now been shown to be invasive in Central Europe (Králová-Hromadová et al., Reference Králová-Hromadová, Spakulová and Horácková2008; Heneberg, Reference Heneberg2013). Fascioloides jacksoni (syn. Fasciola jacksoni Cobbold, 1869) has also been shown to have a considerable impact on wild elephant populations across South-East Asia especially India, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Myanmar and peninsular Malaysia (Lotfy et al., Reference Lotfy, Brant, DeJong, Le, Demiaszkiewicz, Rajapakse, Perera, Laursen and Loker2008; Heneberg, Reference Heneberg2013; Rajapakse et al., Reference Rajapakse, Lawton, Karunathilake, Perera, Nguyen and Le2019). Despite their medical, veterinary and environmental importance there is still a deficit in detailed evolutionary and molecular genetic studies of the Fasciolidae and their relationship within the Echinostomatoidea superfamily.

DNA markers have been shown to be crucial in resolving taxonomic issues and provide a basis for the development of accurate diagnostic tools for parasitic worms (Blair, Reference Blair and Maule2006; Tkach et al., Reference Tkach, Kudlai and Kostadinova2016). Recently, reference DNA sequence data for complete mitochondrial genomes have been obtained for several species within the Fasciolidae family, including F. hepatica, F. gigantica, Fa. buski, Fas. magna and Fas. jacksoni as well as other species across the Echinostomatoidea superfamily (Le et al., Reference Le, Blair and McManus2001; Liu et al., Reference Liu, Gasser, Young, Song, Ai and Zhu2014; Ma et al., Reference Ma, He, Liu, Leontovyč, Kašný and Zhu2016, Reference Ma, Sun, He, Liu, Ai, Chen and Zhu2017; Rajapakse et al., Reference Rajapakse, Lawton, Karunathilake, Perera, Nguyen and Le2019). However, to date, there have been no complete ribosomal gene, nuclear ribosomal transcription units (rTUs) and reference sequences generated that would allow detailed comparisons between species of the Fasciolidae (Králová-Hromadová et al., Reference Králová-Hromadová, Spakulová and Horácková2008; Ichikawa & Itagaki, Reference Ichikawa and Itagaki2010; Rajapakse et al., Reference Rajapakse, Lawton, Karunathilake, Perera, Nguyen and Le2019). The rTU consists of three coding regions, the 18S, 5.8S and 28S rDNA genes, and are separated by two internal transcribed spacer regions, ITS1 and 2. The rTUs are sequentially repeated units arranged into hundreds of copies with the 28S gene being followed by a further non-transcribed intergenic spacer region (IGS) which connects one rTU to another (Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Blair and Li2011; Cerqueira, Lemos, Reference Cerqueira and Lemos2019; Qiu et al., Reference Qiu, Gao, Li, Ma, Lv, Hu, Qiu, Chang and Wang2019). In trematodes each copy unit has a length of 7–9 kb with the typical structure of the rTU as 5′ 18S-ITS1-5.8S-ITS2-28S-IGS 3′ (Cerqueira, Lemos, Reference Cerqueira and Lemos2019).

Historically, only short fragments of 18S and 28S rDNA, and both ITS1 and 2, have been utilized in phylogenetic and population genetic studies. The analyses of short fragments have been extensively used for molecular classification, species identification and evolutionary studies both within and between trematode families (Weider et al., Reference Weider, Elser, Crease, Mateos, Cotner and Markow2005; Blair, Reference Blair and Maule2006). In fact, the rDNA sequences have been shown to be valuable markers in the identification of hybrids and measuring introgression between populations of sympatric fluke species (Blair, Reference Blair and Maule2006; Nguyen et al., Reference Nguyen, De, Nguyen, Quang, Doan, Agatsuma and Le2018). However, until recently very few complete rDNA reference sequences for trematodes have been available which could have been used to develop and refine such molecular markers further (Weider et al., Reference Weider, Elser, Crease, Mateos, Cotner and Markow2005; Blair, Reference Blair and Maule2006).

In this study, we provide complete and near-complete rDNA sequences obtained from six species/strains within the Fasciolidae. We have determined the structure and arrangement of the rTU and provide a detailed account of the characteristics of each ribosomal gene and the intergenic regions. We also provide a detailed comparative phylogenetic analysis of the rDNA sequences, emphasizing their utility as molecular markers for diagnostics, classification and molecular evolutionary studies of the Echinostomatoidea.

Material and methods

Parasite material

Six strains of three species from the three genera, Fasciola, Fasciolopsis and Fascioloides, were used to represent the Fasciolidae in this study. These included: Fasciola hepatica (isolate GL) collected from cattle in Geelong, Australia (38°9′0.0072″S; 144°21′0.0216″E), designated Fhep-GL (AU) (Le et al., Reference Le, Blair and McManus2001); F. gigantica (isolate T4V) from cattle in Thua Thien-Hue Province, Vietnam (16°22′7.932″N; 107°37′31.584″E), designated Fgig-T4V (VN); F. gigantica (isolate NB) from cattle in Ninh Binh Province (20°15′28.764″N; 105°58′33.3732″E), designated Fgig-NB (VN); ‘hybrid’ Fasciola sp. (isolate DL11) from buffalo in Dak Lak Province (12°47′19.284″N; 108°14′23.892″E), designated Fsp-DL11 (VN) (Nguyen et al., Reference Nguyen, De, Nguyen, Quang, Doan, Agatsuma and Le2018); Fas. jacksoni (isolate Madu) from post mortem wild elephants in Maduru, Sri Lanka (7°34′33″N; 81°08′34″E), designated Fjac-Madu (LK) (Rajapakse et al., Reference Rajapakse, Lawton, Karunathilake, Perera, Nguyen and Le2019); Fa. buski (isolate HT) from human in former Ha Tay Province, Vietnam (21°01′42″N 105°51′15″E), designated Fbus-HT (VN). Adult worms of each species were collected from necropsied animals and either frozen or preserved in 70% ethanol before storage at −20°C. Subsequently, the worms were identified to species based on morphology using the standard measures of body length (BL) and width (BW) which have been used to distinguish between species. The average size for F. hepatica was 20–36 mm (BL) × 13 mm (BW), for ‘pure’ F. gigantica was 42–65 mm (BL) × 12 mm (BW), for Fas. jacksoni was 12–14 mm (BL) × 9–12.5 mm (BW) and for the Fa. buski fluke was 41 mm (BL) × 13 mm (BW), with typical morphological features for each species/form described in previous studies (Le et al., Reference Le, Nguyen, Phan, Blair and McManus2004; Lotfy et al., Reference Lotfy, Brant, DeJong, Le, Demiaszkiewicz, Rajapakse, Perera, Laursen and Loker2008; Periago et al., Reference Periago, Valero, El Sayed, Ashrafi, El Wakeel, Mohamed, Desquesnes, Curtale and Mas-Coma2008; Nguyen et al., Reference Nguyen, De, Nguyen, Quang, Doan, Agatsuma and Le2018; Rajapakse et al., Reference Rajapakse, Lawton, Karunathilake, Perera, Nguyen and Le2019). However, the shape of the hybrid form of Fasciola sp. (DL11) resembled F. hepatica in size and could not be distinguished based on morphology alone. Each worm species identification was accurately confirmed using molecular approaches, using both mitochondrial and rDNA sequences, identifying each species as suspected. However, it was only possible to identify the hybrid status of DL11 genetically as it possessed the mitochondrial sequences from F. gigantica and showed to have nuclear ITS2 sequences of F. hepatica.

PCR amplification

Total genomic DNA was extracted from ~10-mg sections of an adult worm using the GeneJET™ Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Thermo Scientific Inc., MA, USA) as instructed, eluted in 100 µl and stored at −20°C until use. The majority of the rTU universal primers used were previously reported (Le et al., Reference Le, Nguyen, Nguyen, Doan, Dung and Blair2017) and some were added for use in this study (supplementary table S1). PCR reactions of 50 µl were prepared using 25 µl of DreamTaq PCR Master Mix (2×) (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., MA, USA) and 2 µl of DNA template (50 ng/μl), 2 µl of each primer (10 pmol/μl), 2 µl DMSO (dimethyl sulphoxide) and 17 µl of water, performed in an MJ PTC-100 thermal cycler. Initiation was at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles consisting of denaturation for 30 s at 94°C, annealing at 52°C for 30 s, extension at 72°C for 6 min and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The PCR products (10 µl of each) were examined on a 1% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV light (Wealtec, Sparks, NV, USA). The amplicons underwent direct sequencing by primer-walking in both directions. Flanking and primer-walking sequencing was applied until the complete sequence for the whole fragment was obtained.

The entire rDNA sequence for each Fasciolidae species/isolate was obtained after editing chromatograms (Chromas 2.6.6; http://technelysium.com.au/wp/chromas/) and 18S, 5.8S and 28S rRNA genes were determined by using the previously published reference sequences and those available in GenBank. These reference sequences were obtained from several trematode species, including Euryhelmis costaricensis (GenBank: AB521797); Isthmiophora hortensis (GenBank: AB189982); Paragonimus kellicotti (GenBank: HQ900670); Paramphistomum cervi (GenBank KJ459934; Zheng et al., Reference Zheng, Chang, Zhang, Tian, Lou, Duan, Guo, Wang and Zhou2014); Brachycladium goliath (GenBank: KR703279; Briscoe et al., Reference Briscoe, Bray, Brabec and Littlewood2016); Eurytrema pancreaticum (5 isolates, GenBank: KY490000−KY490004; Su et al., Reference Su, Zhang, Zheng, Wang, Li, Li and Wang2018); Clonorchis sinensis (five isolates, GenBank: MK450523−MK450527; Qiu et al., Reference Qiu, Gao, Li, Ma, Lv, Hu, Qiu, Chang and Wang2019) and Metorchis orientalis (five isolates, MK482051−MK482055; Qiu et al., Reference Qiu, Gao, Li, Ma, Lv, Hu, Qiu, Chang and Wang2019). For intergenic regions, ITS1 was recognized as located between 18S and 5.8S; ITS2 as between 5.8S and 28S; and the IGS as between 3′ 28S and 5′ 18S sequences, respectively. Repeat units (RUs) were detected in the ITS1 or ITS2 or in IGS using the Tandem Repeat Finder v3.01 (Benson, Reference Benson1999).

Forty-three partial 28S rDNA sequences representing 33 species from across the four families (Fasciolidae, Philophtalmidae, Echinostomatidae, Echinochasmidae) of the Echinostomatoidea were used for phylogenetic analysis. The 28S rDNA sequence of Schistosoma haematobium (family: Schistosomatidae) was used as an outgroup (supplementary table S2). The final 28S rDNA alignment was composed of 43 species/isolates and MEGA 7.0 was used to perform maximum likelihood phylogenetic reconstruction with 1000 bootstrap resamplings (Kumar et al., Reference Kumar, Stecher and Tamura2016). MEGA 7.0 identified the general time-reversible GTR + G + I model (γ rate heterogeneity and a proportion of invariant sites) as the most appropriate model for phylogenetic reconstruction based on the lowest Bayesian information criterion score. Pairwise distance analysis, was also performed on the final 28S rDNA alignment as a measure of genetic divergence (P-distance) between 17 strains of six species, F. gigantica, F. hepatica, hybrid Fasciola sp., Fa. buski, Fas. jacksoni and Fas. magna within the Fasciolidae of the Echinostomatoidea (supplementary table S3).

Results and discussion

The complete rDNA sequence was obtained for F. hepatica (7657 bp), Fas. jacksoni (7781 bp), the DL11 hybrid Fasciola sp. (7966 bp) and Fa. buski (8361 bp); and near-complete sequence for T4V and NB Vietnamese strains of F. gigantica at 6794 bp each, lacking the unsequenced IGS region (table 1) (GenBank accession numbers: MN97005–MN970010). The rDNA genes of T4V and NB strains of F. gigantica, F. hepatica, DL11 hybrid Fasciola and Fas. jacksoni were all shown to be of equal length 1958 bp for 18S, 160 bp for 5.8S and 3863 bp for 28S. The 18S of Fa. buski was also shown to be 1958 bp but the 28S was lengthened to 3862 bp by a single extra-base pair. In all Fasciola spp., the length of ITS1 was 454 bp and 286 bp in Fa. buski. The ITS2 was shown to be 360 bp for F. hepatica and DL11 hybrid Fasciola, but 359 bp for both strains of F. gigantica as well as Fas. jacksoni which lacked a Thymine (T). This T is a differential marker for paternal discrimination of pure F. gigantica and F. hepatica and their subsequent hybrid offspring as previously explored by a number of studies (Le et al., Reference Le, De, Agatsuma, Nguyen, Nguyen, McManus and Blair2008; Ichikawa & Itagaki, Reference Ichikawa and Itagaki2010; Nguyen et al., Reference Nguyen, De, Nguyen, Quang, Doan, Agatsuma and Le2018) (table 1). There were no repeats in any intergenic regions of all Fasciola spp.; however, three repeat units of 361 bp each and one of 356 bp were found in ITS1 of Fa. buski. The IGS sequences did not contain any repeat elements and varied in length across species with F. hepatica having an IGS of 862 bp, DL11 hybrid Fasciola at 1170 bp, Fas. jacksoni at 987 bp and Fa. buski at 561 bp (table 1). The P-distance calculations for the pairwise genetic divergence of 17 rTU sequences, nine of Fasciola spp., four of Fa. buski, two of Fas. jacksoni and two of Fas. magna indicated the lowest level of divergence (0.0 to 0.57%) between F. hepatica and F. gigantica, higher (2.23–2.62%) and the highest (6–6.42%) to Fas. jacksoni and Fa. buski, respectively (supplementary table S3).

Table 1. Position of ribosomal RNA genes, internal transcribed spacers (ITS) and non-transcribed intergenic spacer (IGS) in the ribosomal transcriptional unit of trematodes in the family Fasciolidae in this study

a Fasciola hepatica (GL (AU)): F. hepatica, strain GL, Australia; Fasciola gigantica (T4V (VN)), F. gigantica, strain T4V, Vietnam; Fasciola gigantica (NB (VN)), F. gigantica, strain NB, Vietnam; Fasciola gigantica (DL11 (VN)), ‘hybrid’ Fasciola sp., strain DL11, Vietnam; Fascioloides jacksoni (Madu (LK)), Fas. jacksoni, strain Madu, Sri Lanka; Fasciolopsis buski (HT (VN), Fa. buski, strain HT, Vietnam. ITS, internal transcribed spacer; IGS, non-transcribed intergenic spacer; RU, repeat unit. NA: not available.

Both Fasciola species and the DL11 hybrid shared common generic features in length and nucleotide composition of the ITS1 and two with only one nucleotide change being identified and a lack of the repetitive structures. The single mutational change within the ITS1 region was characterized as the previously identified GTAC haplotype in F. hepatica (RsaI(+)) and the GTAT haplotype in F. gigantica (RsaI(−)). Within the ITS2 region, there was a presence/absence of T (T/−) at position 327 with T being present in F. hepatica and the substitution being absent in both F. gigantica and the DL11 hybrid (Le et al., Reference Le, De, Agatsuma, Nguyen, Nguyen, McManus and Blair2008; Ichikawa & Itagaki, Reference Ichikawa and Itagaki2010; Nguyen et al., Reference Nguyen, De, Nguyen, Quang, Doan, Agatsuma and Le2018).

Interestingly, Fa. buski showed the most striking differences in rDNA relative to the other Fasciolidae members with the 28S and IGS of being distinctly different lengths and the ITS1 also contained four repeat units measuring 356–361 bp each. The variation in repeat number, size and location of the repetitive sequences within the ITS and IGS regions have been shown to be responsible for the high polymorphism seen in these intergenic regions found in many trematode species including the Schistosomatidae, the Opisthorchiidae, the Heterophyidae and the Paramphistomatidae (Lockyer et al., Reference Lockyer, Olson and Ostergaard2003; Tatonova et al., Reference Tatonova, Chelomina and Besprosvannykh2012; Zheng et al., Reference Zheng, Chang, Zhang, Tian, Lou, Duan, Guo, Wang and Zhou2014; Le et al., Reference Le, Nguyen, Nguyen, Doan, Dung and Blair2017; Qiu et al., Reference Qiu, Gao, Li, Ma, Lv, Hu, Qiu, Chang and Wang2019). Owing to the extensive divergence of the ITS1 in Fa. buski we argue that the ITS markers would be inappropriate for interspecies comparisons with other fasciolids. Other studies on trematodes have concluded that these markers are inappropriate for interspecies phylogenetic studies between distantly related genera as both the ITS1 and two acquire repetitive elements and have high mutation rates causing nuclear alignment data to reach substitutional saturation rapidly, diluting the phylogenetic signal that allows accurate taxonomic comparisons (Blair, Reference Blair and Maule2006; Zheng et al., Reference Zheng, Chang, Zhang, Tian, Lou, Duan, Guo, Wang and Zhou2014; Le et al., Reference Le, Nguyen, Nguyen, Doan, Dung and Blair2017). However, although caution is required when using ITS regions, they have been shown to be useful in disentangling relationships between closely related species within a genus (Lockyer et al., Reference Lockyer, Olson and Ostergaard2003; Blair, Reference Blair and Maule2006; Tatonova et al., Reference Tatonova, Chelomina and Besprosvannykh2012; Le et al., Reference Le, Nguyen, Nguyen, Doan, Dung and Blair2017).

Phylogenetic analyses

Forty-nine 28S rDNA sequences of ~1100 bp of 33 species across four families of Echinostomatoidae, (supplementary table S2), including the sequences generated within this study, and sequences of S. haematobium as an outgroup, were aligned and used to perform maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses (fig. 1). The alignment produced a well-supported phylogeny of four families in Echinostomatoidea, illustrating that the family Echinochasmidae are distinct from the cluster formed by Echinostomatidae; Fasciolidae and Philophthalmidae broadly agreeing well with previous findings (Olson et al., Reference Olson, Cribb, Tkach, Bray and Littlewood2003; Tkach et al., Reference Tkach, Kudlai and Kostadinova2016; Rajapakse et al., Reference Rajapakse, Lawton, Karunathilake, Perera, Nguyen and Le2019). Sequences of 18 fasciolid species/isolates were consistently grouped together, in a discrete Fasciolidae clade, distinct from the Philophthalmidae, the Echinostomatidae and the Echinochasmidae. Interestingly, the Echinostomatidae, Fasciolidae and Philophthalmidae, resolved by grouping together in the tree, rendering Echinochasmidae completely distinct. The paraphyletic position of the Echinochasmidae with respect to the Echinostomatidae within the Echinostomatoidea demonstrated clear distinctness between these two families.

Fig. 1. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree showing the position of Fasciola spp., Fascioloides magna, Fascioloides jacksoni, Parafasciolopsis fasciolaemorpha and Fasciolopsis buski within the Fasciolidae based on partial 28S rDNA sequences. Four families of the superfamily Echinostomatoidea (i.e. Fasciolidae, Philophthalmidae, Echinostomatidae, Echinochasmidae) are separately represented (marked by a point at each node). The species/strains used in this study are indicated by arrows. Full names of each species, followed by abbreviations/designation of strains, where available (in brackets) and country origin are provided. Accession numbers are given for each species/strain at the end of each sequence. Nodal support values are shown based on 1000 bootstrap replicates. The scale bar represents the number of substitutions per site.

Within the Fasciolidae clade, F. gigantica and the DL11 hybrid Fasciola sp. clustered together into a single group, forming a monophyletic branch with F. hepatica sequences. As in previous studies based on mitochondrial markers, the topology of the 28S rDNA placed Fas. jacksoni basal to the Fasciola genus, which also included Fas. magna, as the paraphyletic sister taxon to a distinct F. gigantica/F. hepatica clade further confirming the validity of the Fas, jacksoni as a member of the Fascioloides genus rather than Fasciola as originally described (fig. 1). Fasciolopsis buski of Vietnam and India grouped together and was rendered paraphyletic to the Fasciola and other groups.

The phylogenetic analyses of the 28S sequences indicate that the entire superfamily Echinostomatoidea presents broad systematic and taxonomic challenges to be met in the future using combined morphological and molecular analyses, both mitochondrial and ribosomal genomic data, of more species (Heneberg, Reference Heneberg2013; Le et al., Reference Le, Nguyen, Nguyen, Doan, Dung and Blair2016; Tkach et al., Reference Tkach, Kudlai and Kostadinova2016; Rajapakse et al., Reference Rajapakse, Lawton, Karunathilake, Perera, Nguyen and Le2019). As illustrated in this and other studies, the complete rTU provides excellent markers to disentangle phylogenetic associations between parasite species, with its unique properties of having regions, such as the 18S and 28S, which can resolve interspecies relationships within and between families but also regions, such as ITS1 and 2, which are more suited to disentangling relationships between species within a single genus. Such properties could be exploited for the development of accurate molecular diagnostic approaches which are crucial for the monitoring and treatment of these socioeconomically important yet neglected parasites.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit 10.1017/S0022149X20000164

Financial support

This work was funded by the Supporting Program for the Principal Research Scientists from the Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST) to Prof. Dr Thanh Hoa Le (NVCC08-02/19-19).

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

Benson, G (1999) Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Research 27, 573580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blair, D (2006) Ribosomal DNA variation in parasitic flatworms. pp. 96123in Maule, A (Ed.) Parasitic Flatworms: Molecular Biology, Biochemistry, Immunology and Control. CAB International, Oxfordshire, UK.Google Scholar
Briscoe, AG, Bray, RA, Brabec, J and Littlewood, DTJ (2016) The mitochondrial genome and ribosomal operon of Brachycladium goliath (Digenea: Brachycladiidae) recovered from a stranded Minke whale. Parasitology International 65, 271275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cerqueira, AV and Lemos, B (2019) Ribosomal DNA and the nucleolus as keystones of nuclear architecture, organization, and function. Trends in Genetics 35, 710723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heneberg, P (2013) Phylogenetic data suggest the reclassification of Fasciola jacksoni (Digenea: Fasciolidae) as Fascioloides jacksoni comb. nov. Parasitology Research 112, 16791689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ichikawa, M and Itagaki, T (2010) Discrimination of the ITS1 types of Fasciola spp. based on a PCR-RFLP method. Parasitology Research 106, 757761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Králová-Hromadová, I, Spakulová, M, Horácková, E, et al. (2008) Sequence analysis of ribosomal and mitochondrial genes of the giant liver fluke Fascioloides magna (Trematoda: Fasciolidae): intraspecific variation and differentiation from Fasciola hepatica. Journal of Parasitology 94, 5867.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, S, Stecher, G and Tamura, K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33, 18701874.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le, TH, Blair, D and McManus, DP (2001) Complete DNA sequence and gene organization of the mitochondrial genome of the liverfluke, Fasciola hepatica L. (Platyhelminthes; Trematoda). Parasitology 123, 609621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le, TH, Nguyen, VD, Phan, BU, Blair, D and McManus, DP (2004) Case report: unusual presentation of Fasciolopsis buski in a Vietnamese child. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 98, 193194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le, TH, De, NV, Agatsuma, T, Nguyen, TGT, Nguyen, QD, McManus, DP and Blair, D (2008) Human fascioliasis and the presence of hybrid/introgressed forms of Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica in Vietnam. International Journal for Parasitology 38, 725730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le, TH, Nguyen, NTB, Nguyen, KT, Doan, HTT, Dung, DT and Blair, D (2016) A complete mitochondrial genome from Echinochasmus japonicus supports the elevation of Echinochasminae Odhner, 1910 to family rank (Trematoda: Platyhelminthes). Infection, Genetics and Evolution 45, 369377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le, TH, Nguyen, KT, Nguyen, NTB, Doan, HTT, Dung, DT and Blair, D (2017) The ribosomal transcription units of Haplorchis pumilio and H. taichui and the use of 28S sequences for phylogenetic identification of common heterophyids in Vietnam. Parasites & Vectors 10, 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, GH, Gasser, RB, Young, ND, Song, HQ, Ai, L and Zhu, XQ (2014) Complete mitochondrial genomes of the ‘intermediate form’ of Fasciola and Fasciola gigantica, and their comparison with F. hepatica. Parasites & Vectors 7, 150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lockyer, AE, Olson, PD, Ostergaard, P, et al. (2003) The phylogeny of the Schistosomatidae based on three genes with emphasis on the interrelationships of Schistosoma Weinland, 1858. Parasitology 126, 203224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lotfy, WM, Brant, SV, DeJong, RJ, Le, TH, Demiaszkiewicz, A, Rajapakse, RPVJ, Perera, VBVP, Laursen, JR and Loker, ES (2008) Evolutionary origins, diversification, and biogeography of liver flukes (Digenea, Fasciolidae). American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 79, 248255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, J, He, JJ, Liu, GH, Leontovyč, R, Kašný, M and Zhu, XQ (2016) Complete mitochondrial genome of the giant liver fluke Fascioloides magna (Digenea: Fasciolidae) and its comparison with selected trematodes. Parasites & Vectors 9, 429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, J, Sun, MM, He, JJ, Liu, GH, Ai, L, Chen, MX and Zhu, XQ (2017) Fasciolopsis buski (Digenea: Fasciolidae) from China and India may represent distinct taxa based on mitochondrial and nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Parasites & Vectors 10, 101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mas-Coma, S, Valero, MA and Bargues, MD (2019) Fascioliasis. pp. 71103in Toledo, R and Fried, B (Eds) Digenetic Trematodes. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology Vol. 1154. Springer International Publishing, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, NTB, De, NV, Nguyen, TKL, Quang, HH, Doan, HTT, Agatsuma, T and Le, TH (2018) Distribution status of hybrid types in large liver flukes, Fasciola species (Digenea: Fasciolidae), from ruminants and humans in Vietnam. Korean Journal of Parasitology 56, 453461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, PD, Cribb, TH, Tkach, VV, Bray, RA and Littlewood, DTJ (2003) Phylogeny and classification of the Digenea (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda). International Journal for Parasitology 33, 733755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Periago, MV, Valero, MA, El Sayed, M, Ashrafi, K, El Wakeel, A, Mohamed, MY, Desquesnes, M, Curtale, F and Mas-Coma, S (2008) First phenotypic description of Fasciola hepatica/Fasciola gigantica intermediate forms from the human endemic area of the Nile Delta, Egypt. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 8, 5158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qiu, YY, Gao, Y, Li, Y, Ma, XX, Lv, QB, Hu, Y, Qiu, HY, Chang, QC and Wang, CR (2019) Comparative analyses of complete ribosomal DNA sequences of Clonorchis sinensis and Metorchis orientalis: IGS sequences may provide a novel genetic marker for intraspecific variation. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 78, 104125.Google ScholarPubMed
Rajapakse, RPVJ, Lawton, SP, Karunathilake, KJK, Perera, VBVP, Nguyen, NTB and Le, TH (2019) Molecular characterization of Fasciola jacksoni from wild elephants (Elephas maximus maximus) of Sri Lanka; a taxonomic evaluation. Parasitology 146, 12471255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Su, X, Zhang, Y, Zheng, X, Wang, XX, Li, Y, Li, Q and Wang, CR (2018) Characterization of the complete nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences of Eurytrema pancreaticum. Journal of Helminthology 92, 484490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tatonova, YV, Chelomina, GN and Besprosvannykh, VV (2012) Genetic diversity of nuclear ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 rDNA sequence in Clonorchis sinensis Cobbold, 1875 (Trematoda: Opisthorchidae) from the Russian Far East. Parasitology International 61, 664674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tkach, VV, Kudlai, O and Kostadinova, A (2016) Molecular phylogeny and systematics of the Echinostomatoidea Looss, 1899 (Platyhelminthes: Digenea). International Journal for Parasitology 46, 171185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weider, LJ, Elser, JJ, Crease, TJ, Mateos, M, Cotner, JB and Markow, TA (2005) The functional significance of ribosomal rDNA variation: Impacts on the evolutionary ecology of organisms. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36, 219242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, GH, Blair, D, Li, XY, et al. (2011) The ribosomal intergenic spacer (IGS) region in Schistosoma japonicum: structure and comparisons with related species. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 11, 610617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, X, Chang, QC, Zhang, Y, Tian, SQ, Lou, Y, Duan, H, Guo, DH, Wang, CR and Zhou, XQ (2014) Characterization of the complete nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences of Paramphistomum cervi. Scientific World Journal 2014, 751907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Position of ribosomal RNA genes, internal transcribed spacers (ITS) and non-transcribed intergenic spacer (IGS) in the ribosomal transcriptional unit of trematodes in the family Fasciolidae in this study

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree showing the position of Fasciola spp., Fascioloides magna, Fascioloides jacksoni, Parafasciolopsis fasciolaemorpha and Fasciolopsis buski within the Fasciolidae based on partial 28S rDNA sequences. Four families of the superfamily Echinostomatoidea (i.e. Fasciolidae, Philophthalmidae, Echinostomatidae, Echinochasmidae) are separately represented (marked by a point at each node). The species/strains used in this study are indicated by arrows. Full names of each species, followed by abbreviations/designation of strains, where available (in brackets) and country origin are provided. Accession numbers are given for each species/strain at the end of each sequence. Nodal support values are shown based on 1000 bootstrap replicates. The scale bar represents the number of substitutions per site.

Supplementary material: File

Le et al. supplementary material

Le et al. supplementary material

Download Le et al. supplementary material(File)
File 51.1 KB