Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T11:06:05.734Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Leishmania infection in bats from a non-endemic region of Leishmaniasis in Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2017

CÉSAR GÓMEZ-HERNÁNDEZ
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil
ELAINE C. BENTO
Affiliation:
Centro de Educação Profissional – CEFORES, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil
KARINE REZENDE-OLIVEIRA
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Campus do Pontal, Ituiutaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil
GABRIEL A. N. NASCENTES
Affiliation:
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil
CECILIA G. BARBOSA
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil
LARA R. BATISTA
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil
MONIQUE G. S. TIBURCIO
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil
ANDRÉ L. PEDROSA
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil
ELIANE LAGES-SILVA
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil
JUAN D. RAMÍREZ
Affiliation:
Grupo de Investigaciones Microbiológicas – UR (GIMUR), Programa de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemáticas, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia
LUIS E. RAMIREZ*
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author: Laboratório de Parasitologia, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Rua Getúlio Guaritá S/N, Bairro Abadia, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, CEP 38025-180, Brazil. E-mail: ramirez_fmtm@yahoo.com.br

Summary

Leishmaniasis is a complex of zoonotic diseases caused by parasites of the genus Leishmania, which can develop in domestic as well as wild animals and humans throughout the world. Currently, this disease is spreading in rural and urban areas of non-endemic regions in Brazil. Recently, bats have gained epidemiological significance in leishmaniasis due to its close relationship with human settlements. In this study, we investigated the presence of Leishmania spp. DNA in blood samples from 448 bats belonging to four families representing 20 species that were captured in the Triangulo Mineiro and Alto Paranaiba areas of Minas Gerais State (non-endemic areas for leishmaniasis), Brazil. Leishmania spp. DNA was detected in 8·0% of the blood samples, 41·6% of which were Leishmania infantum, 38·9% Leishmania amazonensis and 19·4% Leishmania braziliensis. No positive correlation was found between Leishmania spp. and bat food source. The species with more infection rates were the insectivorous bats Eumops perotis; 22·2% (4/18) of which tested positive for Leishmania DNA. The presence of Leishmania in the bat blood samples, as observed in this study, represents epidemiological importance due to the absence of Leishmaniasis cases in the region.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

INTRODUCTION

The leishmaniases are considered zoonoses where humans are accidental hosts. Natural vertebrate hosts include mammals of the Cingulata, Pilosa, Carnivora, Rodentia, Primate, Marsupialia and Perissodactyla orders. The primary hosts are wild mammals, such as rodents and canids (Ashford, Reference Ashford1996). Globally, more than 30 species of trypanosomes have been recorded in over a hundred of species of bats (Molyneux, Reference Molyneux, Kreier and Baker1991). In the Americas, families of the Phyllostomidae, Vespertilionidae and Molossidae are the most commonly infected bats (Brener and Andrade, Reference Brener and Andrade1979).

Despite its close relationship with trypanosomatids, the role of bats in the biological cycle of Leishmania has receiving increasing attention. However, some species of sand flies can live in the same locations inhabited by these mammals, such as caves, crevices, houses or abandoned buildings. In these environments, bats are a food source for insects (Lampo et al. Reference Lampo, Feliciangeli, Marquez, Bastidas and Lau2000) and vice versa. Some studies have reported direct (Mutinga, Reference Mutinga1975) and indirect evidence (Morsy et al. Reference Morsy, Salama and Abdel Hamid1987) that bats have been infected by Leishmania spp. The only report of parasites from the genus Leishmania isolated from bats was observed with the growth of Leishmania infantum (syn. L. chagasi) in a blood culture from the bat species Carollia perspicillata (De Lima et al. Reference De Lima, Rodriguez, Barrios, Avila, Canizales and Gutierrez2008). The presence of L. infantum, L. amazonensis and L. braziliensis DNA in bats was already demonstrated in studies conducted in Brazil (Savani et al. Reference Savani, de Almeida, de Oliveira Camargo, D'Auria, Silva, de Oliveira and Sacramento2010).

Diverse natural Leishmania infection in bats has been reported around the World (Mutinga, Reference Mutinga1975; Rajendran et al. Reference Rajendran, Chatterjee, Dhanda and Dhiman1985; Morsy et al. Reference Morsy, Salama and Abdel Hamid1987; Rotureau et al. Reference Rotureau, Catzeflis and Carme2006; De Lima et al. Reference De Lima, Rodriguez, Barrios, Avila, Canizales and Gutierrez2008; Savani et al. Reference Savani, de Almeida, de Oliveira Camargo, D'Auria, Silva, de Oliveira and Sacramento2010; Shapiro et al. Reference Shapiro, da Costa Lima Junior, Dorval, de Oliveira Franca, Cepa Matos Mde and Bordignon2013; Millan et al. Reference Millan, Ferroglio and Solano-Gallego2014a ; Berzunza-Cruz et al. Reference Berzunza-Cruz, Rodriguez-Moreno, Gutierrez-Granados, Gonzalez-Salazar, Stephens, Hidalgo-Mihart, Marina, Rebollar-Tellez, Bailon-Martinez, Balcells, Ibarra-Cerdena, Sanchez-Cordero and Becker2015). These findings suggest their possible epidemiological incrimination in the transmission cycle of Leishmania. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of Leishmania DNA in blood samples of bats captured in a region considered non-endemic for Leishmaniasis in Brazil (Triângulo Mineiro and Alto Paranaiba regions of Minas Gerais).

METHODS

Study area and capture of bats

Bats were captured in a study conducted previously in different rural regions of the Triangulo Mineiro (Agua Comprida S21°54′0″, W45°40′0″; Conceição das Alagoas S19°54′51″, W48°23′11″; Conquista S19°56′20″, W47°32′38″; Uberaba S19°45′27, W47°55′36″; Uberlandia S18°54′41″, W48°15′44″) and Alto Paranaiba (Araxá S19°35′36″, W46°56′27″; Nova Ponte S19°9′46″, W47°40′42″ and Perdizes S19°21′19″, W47°16′58″) (Bento, Reference Bento2006; Bento, Reference Bento2013). These regions are areas of ‘cerrado’ (Brazilian savanna) (Ab'sáber, Reference Ab'sáber and Ferri1971; Alho, Reference Alho and Pinto1993; Rizzini, Reference Rizzini1997). Climate in most of the study area is classified as Aw (Tropical savannah climate, with summer rains) with two defined seasons (dry and rainy). The rains occur most often in the hottest season from October to March, when the average minimum temperature is higher than 18 °C. The dry season is between April and September. The annual precipitation varies between 1400 and 17 000 mm, and is concentrated between December and February (Motta, Reference Motta1993). These regions were classified as non-endemic areas by the time bat were captured. The captures occurred during the night, between approximately 18 and 24 h, using mist nets, dip nets or manually. The taxonomic classification of the captured bats was conducted using keys for the family (Gregorin, Reference Gregorin and Taddei2002), genus and species (Vizotto and Taddei , Reference Vizotto and Taddei1973; Reis et al. Reference Reis, Peracchi, Pedro and Lima2007).

Blood collection

From each of the 448 bats captured, 0·5–1·0 mL of blood was collected by cardiac puncture and blood samples were preserved in guanidine-EDTA solution V/V (6 m Guanidine–HCl and 0·2 m disodium EDTA, pH 8·0) and stored at 4 °C.

DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

The DNA extraction from blood was performed using the phenol–chloroform method (Gomes et al. Reference Gomes, Macedo, Vago, Pena, Galvao and Chiari1998). In order to amplify Leishmania DNA, we employed primers Jw11 (5′-CCTATTTTACACCAACCCCCAGT-3′) and Jw12 (5′-GGGTAGGGGCGTTCTGCGAAA-3′) targeting the Leishmania kDNA region (Nicolas et al. Reference Nicolas, Prina, Lang and Milon2002). The electrophoresis was performed in agarose gel 1% stained with GelRed™ 1× (Biotium, USA) and visualized in UV transiluminator.

The positives sample for kDNA was performed PCR of the partial region of the cytochrome b gene (marker encoded on maxicircles), it was amplified in a total volume of 50 µL containing 1× of buffer, 100 mm of dNTPs, 50 pm of each primer, 1·25 U of GoTaq Polymerase (Promega) and 10 ng of DNA. The PCR products were precipitated with 70% and sequenced by the dideoxy-terminal method in an automated capillary sequencer (AB3730, Applied Biosystems) by both strands in ACTGene Analises Moleculares (Brazil). The sequences were submitted to BLASTn for similarity search with Leishmania sequences deposited on the databases. Since Cytb marker is not able to discriminate L. braziliensis from L. peruviana species, the positive samples were subsequently typed by the direct sequencing of HSP70 as recommended elsewhere (Hernandez et al. Reference Hernandez, Alvarez, Gonzalez, Ayala, Leon and Ramirez2014; Ramirez and Galetti, Reference Ramirez and Galetti2015).

Identification of Leishmania species

The resulting sequences were edited in MEGA 5·0 and aligned using ClustalW 1·8 with sequences from L. donovani donovani (AB095957), L. donovani infantum (AB095958), L. donovani chagasi (AB095959), L. tropica (AB095960), L. major (AB095961), L. aethiopica (AB095962), L. mexicana mexicana (AB095963), L. amazonensis (AB095964), L. garnhami (AB095965), L. braziliensis (AB095966), L. panamensis (AB095968), L. guyanensis (AB095969), L. equatoriensis (AB434687), L. pifanoi (EF579907), L. lainsoni (AB433280), L. colombiensis (KF302738) and L. peruviana (AB433282) retrieved from GeneBank as suggested by different studies (Luyo-Acero et al. Reference Luyo-Acero, Uezato, Oshiro, Takei, Kariya, Katakura, Gomez-Landires, Hashiguchi and Nonaka2004). A maximum composite likelihood (MCL) analysis using a Tamura-3 parameter was run in MEGA 7·0. To evaluate the robustness of the nodes in the resulting phylogenetic tree, 1000 bootstrap replicates were performed. All sequences obtained in this work were deposit in the Genbank (MF344824–MF344895).

Statistical analysis

The Chi-square (χ 2) test was used to determine possible associations between variables (feeding habits and county capture) and positive PCR results for Leishmania sp. using Statistica software 10·0 (Statsoft, Tulsa, OK, 2011), with a significance level of 5% (P < 0·05).

Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Use of Animals (CEUA) of the Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, protocol n. 51 and authorized by the Brazilian Environmental Institute (IBAMA) under licenses: 076/2003, 121/2004, 143/06-NUFAS/MG and 13206-1.

RESULTS

Leishmania infection

Blood samples of 448 bats representing 20 different species captured in eight districts of Triângulo Mineiro and Alto Paranaiba, MG, Brazil (Table 1) were analysed. In five out of the eight studied municipalities, 36 bats were positive for Leishmania spp. The highest frequency of bats infected with Leishmania was in Água Comprida (11·4%), followed by Conquista (9·9%), Uberaba (9·4%), Araxá (9·1%) and Perdizes (3·6%). Regarding the bat's alimentary habit, the highest percentage bats that tested positive of Leishmania spp. DNA were insectivores (12·6%), followed by omnivores (8·3%), nectarivores (7·5%), frugivorous (6·1%) and haematophagous (3·2%). However, there was no significant association between feeding habits and presence of Leishmania sp. (P = 0·416) or the municipality of origin (P = 0·431).

Table 1. Bat species captured in Minas Gerais, Brazil by family, feeding habits and county origin

Identification of Leishmania species

Eight out of the 20 species of bats captured were positive for Leishmania spp. (40·0%). The species with multiple representative samples that had the highest rate of Leishmaina presence was Eumops perotis (22·2%), followed by Platyrrhinus lineatus (18·2%), Artibeus planirostris (16·7%), Molossus molossus (11·5%), Phyllostomus hastatus (8·8%), Glossophagas soricina (8·0%) and Desmodus rotundus (3·2%) (Table 2). Additionally, only one species of Eptesicus furinalis was captured, and it was found to positive for Leishmania spp. (Table 2). Leishmania species identified in the infected bats were: L. infatum in 41·6%, L. amazonensis in 38·9% L. braziliensis in 19·4%, respectively (Table 2). These results were supported by the maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree constructed based on Cytb marker (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Molecular phylogenetic analysis by the maximum-likelihood (ML) method. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the ML method based on the Tamura–Nei model. The tree with the highest log likelihood (−2763,0697) is shown. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying Neighbour-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the maximum composite likelihood (MCL) approach, and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value. The analysis involved 61 nucleotide sequences. Codon positions included were 1st+2nd+3rd+Non-coding. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There were a total of 405 positions in the final dataset. Black dots indicate bootstrap values over 80%.

Table 2. Positivity for Leishmania species in bats captured in Minas Gerais, Brazil

DISCUSSION

Leishmaniases comprise a set of pathologies caused by different species of the genus Leishmania. This infection is considered an anthropozoonosis where more than 100 mammals have been naturally infected with these parasites. Among those mammal hosts, bats arise as some of the most important putative reservoirs of some Leishmania species. Herein, we investigated the presence of Leishmania DNA in bat's blood samples collected in areas of Triângulo Mineiro and Alto Paranaíba from Brazil that are considered non-endemic for leishmaniasis. We observed 8·0% of positive samples for Leishmania infection. Diverse studies have reported natural infection of Leishmania in bats suggesting a relevant epidemiological role in the transmission cycle of leishmaniasis (Rotureau et al. Reference Rotureau, Catzeflis and Carme2006; Savani et al. Reference Savani, de Almeida, de Oliveira Camargo, D'Auria, Silva, de Oliveira and Sacramento2010; Shapiro et al. Reference Shapiro, da Costa Lima Junior, Dorval, de Oliveira Franca, Cepa Matos Mde and Bordignon2013; Millan et al. Reference Millan, Lopez-Roig, Cabezon and Serra-Cobo2014b ; Berzunza-Cruz et al. Reference Berzunza-Cruz, Rodriguez-Moreno, Gutierrez-Granados, Gonzalez-Salazar, Stephens, Hidalgo-Mihart, Marina, Rebollar-Tellez, Bailon-Martinez, Balcells, Ibarra-Cerdena, Sanchez-Cordero and Becker2015; de Rezende et al. Reference de Rezende, Herrera, Carvalho, Carvalho Anjos, Ramos, de Araujo, Torres and de Oliveira2017). Also, the fact of finding Leishmania infection in a geographical region that is not considered endemic for leishmaniasis shows the relevant role that bats play for the dispersal of distinct pathogens as Leishmania. The ecology of these mammals highlights their putative importance as reservoirs of infectious diseases and zoonotic pathogens due to their high ability of mobility, broad distribution and social behaviour (communal roosting and fission–fusion social structure). Among these pathogens emerge rabies, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), henipavirus, possibly Ebola and distinct Trypanosoma species (Halpin et al. Reference Halpin, Young, Field and Mackenzie2000; Guyatt et al. Reference Guyatt, Twin, Davis, Holmes, Smith, Smith, Mackenzie and Young2003; Li et al. Reference Li, Shi, Yu, Ren, Smith, Epstein, Wang, Crameri, Hu, Zhang, Zhang, McEachern, Field, Daszak, Eaton, Zhang and Wang2005; Hamilton et al. Reference Hamilton, Cruickshank, Stevens, Teixeira and Mathews2012a ,Reference Hamilton, Teixeira and Stevens b ).

Frugivores, insectivorous, omnivores and vampire bats were positive for the presence of Leishmania DNA, but no significant association was found between the bat-feeding preference and parasite infection rates (Brener and Andrade, Reference Brener and Andrade1979; Marinkellei, Reference Marinkellei1982) as observed in our study. The identification of Leishmania hosts is crucial to determine the natural transmission cycle of this parasite and to understand the epidemiology of the disease (Brandao-Filho et al. Reference Brandao-Filho, Brito, Carvalho, Ishikawa, Cupolillo, Floeter-Winter and Shaw2003). Some authors consider animals as potential reservoirs when the infection rate is above 20%, while lower percentages indicate that the animal is an accidental host (Berzunza-Cruz et al. Reference Berzunza-Cruz, Rodriguez-Moreno, Gutierrez-Granados, Gonzalez-Salazar, Stephens, Hidalgo-Mihart, Marina, Rebollar-Tellez, Bailon-Martinez, Balcells, Ibarra-Cerdena, Sanchez-Cordero and Becker2015). On the other hand, studies define a reservoir as one or more epidemiologically connected populations or environments in which the parasite can be permanently maintained and from which infection is transmitted to the defined target population (Haydon et al. Reference Haydon, Cleaveland, Taylor and Laurenson2002; Thompson and Etter, Reference Thompson and Etter2015). In this pragmatic scenario, bats from our study would not be considered strict reservoirs. This is clearly depicted to the fact that the area where bats were captured is not considered endemic for leishmaniasis. However, the presence of Leishmania DNA implies that the circulation of parasites could provoke future likely emergent outbreaks. In the light of our data, these findings represent relevant information in order to consider prevention and control strategies in the region.

The biggest limitation in the understanding of the ecology of leishmaniasis is the lack of sensitive markers for the identification and discrimination of Leishmania species. Traditionally, microscopic examination is considered the diagnostic routine method for identification of Leishmania. However, more sensitive methods such as the PCR have been developed as an alternative for the diagnosis and identification of Leishmania species. PCR platforms show sensitivity values between 92 and 100% and specificity of 100% (Shahbazi et al. Reference Shahbazi, Shahabi, Kazemi, Mohebali, Abadi and Zare2008; Mohammadiha et al. Reference Mohammadiha, Mohebali, Haghighi, Mahdian, Abadi, Zarei, Yeganeh, Kazemi, Taghipour and Akhoundi2013; Adams et al. Reference Adams, Gomez, Scheske, Rios, Marquez, Cossio, Albertini, Schallig and Saravia2014). For the amplification of DNA fragments of Leishmania species, the use of genetic targets such as kinetoplast DNA (kDNA), which has a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 87%, has been reported in several studies (Marques et al. Reference Marques, Volpini, Genaro, Mayrink and Romanha2001; Rodriguez et al. Reference Rodriguez, De Lima, Aguilar, Rodriguez, Barker and Convit2002). The internal heat shock protein 70 kDa (HSP70) also reflects a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 100% (Garcia et al. Reference Garcia, Parrado, De Doncker, Bermudez and Dujardin2007; Montalvo et al. Reference Montalvo, Fraga, El Safi, Gramiccia, Jaffe, Dujardin and Van der Auwera2014) and the transcribed internal spacer (ITS-1) with 40 and 96%, respectively (Marfurt et al. Reference Marfurt, Nasereddin, Niederwieser, Jaffe, Beck and Felger2003; Kumar et al. Reference Kumar, Bumb, Ansari, Mehta and Salotra2007; Ovalle Bracho et al. Reference Ovalle Bracho, Porras de Quintana, Muvdi Arenas and Rios Parra2007) and finally the small 18S ribosomal subunit with a similar behaviour as kDNA in terms of sensitivity and specificity (Adams et al. Reference Adams, Gomez, Scheske, Rios, Marquez, Cossio, Albertini, Schallig and Saravia2014). These are the most commonly used markers for the identification of Leishmania DNA by PCR and real-time PCR. Regarding the use of molecular markers used to discriminate in mammals, Cytb and 18S have been widely used in mammals (De Lima et al. Reference De Lima, Rodriguez, Barrios, Avila, Canizales and Gutierrez2008; Pinto et al. Reference Pinto, Ocana-Mayorga, Tapia, Lobos, Zurita, Aguirre-Villacis, MacDonald, Villacis, Lima, Teixeira, Grijalva and Perkins2015). Herein, we employed kDNA to detect Leishmania infection and subsequently amplified and sequenced Cytb. All samples positive by kDNA amplified by Cytb. kDNA represents around the 10% of Leishmania genome and Cytb marker is located in the maxicircle molecule with dozens of copies (Liu et al. Reference Liu, Liu, Motyka, Agbo and Englund2005). The number of copies suggests, Cytb is a very sensitive marker to conduct Leishmania species discrimination in mammals. This marker has been used in other trypanosomes with relevant results in terms of sensitivity (De Lima et al. Reference De Lima, Rodriguez, Barrios, Avila, Canizales and Gutierrez2008; Marcili et al. Reference Marcili, Speranca, da Costa, Madeira Mde, Soares, Sanches Cde, Acosta Ida, Girotto, Minervino, Horta, Shaw and Gennari2014; Ramirez and Llewellyn, Reference Ramirez and Llewellyn2014). Also, several authors have shown the high specificity of Cytb to discriminate Leishmania species (Foulet et al. Reference Foulet, Botterel, Buffet, Morizot, Rivollet, Deniau, Pratlong, Costa and Bretagne2007; Ramirez et al. Reference Ramirez, Hernandez, Leon, Ayala, Florez and Gonzalez2016) Therefore, future studies should consider Cytb as a suitable marker for Leishmania species discrimination in mammals.

A vast number of Leishmania species have been described in bats from Brazil such as L. infantum, L. amazonensis and L. braziliensis (De Lima et al. Reference De Lima, Rodriguez, Barrios, Avila, Canizales and Gutierrez2008; Savani et al. Reference Savani, de Almeida, de Oliveira Camargo, D'Auria, Silva, de Oliveira and Sacramento2010; de Rezende et al. Reference de Rezende, Herrera, Carvalho, Carvalho Anjos, Ramos, de Araujo, Torres and de Oliveira2017). Herein, we detected single infections of L. infantum, L. amazonensis and L. braziliensis, which highlights the epidemiological threat in the transmission to humans causing visceral, cutaneous and/or mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (Lemos and Lima Reference Lemos and Lima2005; Paula et al. Reference Paula, Souza, dos Reis, Limongi, Pajuaba Neto Ade and Rodrigues Ede2013). This work opens new perspectives to study the importance of bats in the epidemiology of leishmaniases, though the presence of amastigotes in the skin or blood of the animal has not been directly demonstrated, which would provide the greatest opportunity for phlebotomine infection.

In conclusion, our results showed that bats from the Triângulo Mineiro and Alto Paranaiba regions of Brazil are involved in the transmission cycles of L. infantum, L. amazonensis and L. braziliensis. The epidemiological importance of the role bats play in leishmaniasis has not yet been defined.

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

National Incentive Program for Research in Parasitology Basic/2010, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). Process CNPq 307284/2014-0, productivity in research.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

These authors contributed equally to this work.

References

Ab'sáber, A. N. (1971). A organização natural das paisagens inter e subtropicais brasileirasp. In III Simpósio sobre o Cerrado. 1st edn. (Ferri, M.G., coord.), pp. 114. Edgar Blücher-EDUSP Press, São Paulo, BR.Google Scholar
Adams, E. R., Gomez, M. A., Scheske, L., Rios, R., Marquez, R., Cossio, A., Albertini, A., Schallig, H. and Saravia, N. G. (2014). Sensitive diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis by lesion swab sampling coupled to qPCR. Parasitology 141, 18911897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alho, C. J. R. (1993). Distribuição da fauna num gradiente de recursos em mosaico. In Cerrado (Pinto, M. N., Org.), pp. 213262. Editora Editora UnB/Sematec, Brasília, BR.Google Scholar
Ashford, R. W. (1996). Leishmaniasis reservoirs and their significance in control. Clinics in Dermatology 14, 523532.Google Scholar
Bento, E. C. (2006). Morcegos do Triângulo Mineiro e sua associação com Tripanosomatídeos, Filarídeos, Fungos, Vírus rábico e Ectoparasitos, vol. Mestrado, p. 218. Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba.Google Scholar
Bento, E. C. (2013). Tripanosomas isolados de diferentes reservatórios silvestres em região endêmica para doença de Chagas em Minas Gerais, Brasil, vol. Doutorado, p. 238. Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba.Google Scholar
Berzunza-Cruz, M., Rodriguez-Moreno, A., Gutierrez-Granados, G., Gonzalez-Salazar, C., Stephens, C. R., Hidalgo-Mihart, M., Marina, C. F., Rebollar-Tellez, E. A., Bailon-Martinez, D., Balcells, C. D., Ibarra-Cerdena, C. N., Sanchez-Cordero, V. and Becker, I. (2015). Leishmania (L.) mexicana infected bats in Mexico: novel potential reservoirs. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 9, e0003438.Google Scholar
Brandao-Filho, S. P., Brito, M. E., Carvalho, F. G., Ishikawa, E. A., Cupolillo, E., Floeter-Winter, L. and Shaw, J. J. (2003). Wild and synanthropic hosts of Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis in the endemic cutaneous leishmaniasis locality of Amaraji, Pernambuco State, Brazil. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 97, 291296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brener, Z. and Andrade, Z. A. (1979). Trypanosoma cruzi e doença de Chagas, 1st edn. Guanabara Koogan, Rio de Janeiro, BR.Google Scholar
De Lima, H., Rodriguez, N., Barrios, M. A., Avila, A., Canizales, I. and Gutierrez, S. (2008). Isolation and molecular identification of Leishmania chagasi from a bat (Carollia perspicillata) in northeastern Venezuela. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 103, 412414.Google Scholar
de Rezende, M. B., Herrera, H. M., Carvalho, C. M., Carvalho Anjos, E. A., Ramos, C. A., de Araujo, F. R., Torres, J. M. and de Oliveira, C. E. (2017). Detection of Leishmania spp. in bats from an area of Brazil endemic for visceral leishmaniasis. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foulet, F., Botterel, F., Buffet, P., Morizot, G., Rivollet, D., Deniau, M., Pratlong, F., Costa, J. M. and Bretagne, S. (2007). Detection and identification of Leishmania species from clinical specimens by using a real-time PCR assay and sequencing of the cytochrome B gene. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 45, 21102115.Google Scholar
Garcia, A. L., Parrado, R., De Doncker, S., Bermudez, H. and Dujardin, J. C. (2007). American tegumentary leishmaniasis: direct species identification of Leishmania in non-invasive clinical samples. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 101, 368-371.Google Scholar
Gomes, M. L., Macedo, A. M., Vago, A. R., Pena, S. D., Galvao, L. M. and Chiari, E. (1998). Trypanosoma cruzi: optimization of polymerase chain reaction for detection in human blood. Experimental Parasitology 88, 2833.Google Scholar
Gregorin, R., Taddei, V. A. (2002). Chave artificial para a identificação de molossídeos brasileiros (Mammalia, Chiroptera). Journal of Neotropical Mammalogy 9, 1332.Google Scholar
Guyatt, K. J., Twin, J., Davis, P., Holmes, E. C., Smith, G. A., Smith, I. L., Mackenzie, J. S. and Young, P. L. (2003). A molecular epidemiological study of Australian bat lyssavirus. Journal of General Virology 84, 485496.Google Scholar
Halpin, K., Young, P. L., Field, H. E. and Mackenzie, J. S. (2000). Isolation of Hendra virus from pteropid bats: a natural reservoir of Hendra virus. Journal of General Virology 81, 19271932.Google Scholar
Hamilton, P. B., Cruickshank, C., Stevens, J. R., Teixeira, M. M. and Mathews, F. (2012a). Parasites reveal movement of bats between the New and Old Worlds. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 63, 521526.Google Scholar
Hamilton, P. B., Teixeira, M. M. and Stevens, J. R. (2012b). The evolution of Trypanosoma cruzi: the ‘bat seeding’ hypothesis. Trends in Parasitology 28, 136141.Google Scholar
Haydon, D. T., Cleaveland, S., Taylor, L. H. and Laurenson, M. K. (2002). Identifying reservoirs of infection: a conceptual and practical challenge. Emerging Infectious Diseases 8, 14681473.Google Scholar
Hernandez, C., Alvarez, C., Gonzalez, C., Ayala, M. S., Leon, C. M. and Ramirez, J. D. (2014). Identification of six New World Leishmania species through the implementation of a High-Resolution Melting (HRM) genotyping assay. Parasites & Vectors 7, 501.Google Scholar
Kumar, R., Bumb, R. A., Ansari, N. A., Mehta, R. D. and Salotra, P. (2007). Cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania tropica in Bikaner, India: parasite identification and characterization using molecular and immunologic tools. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 76, 896901.Google Scholar
Lampo, M., Feliciangeli, M. D., Marquez, L. M., Bastidas, C. and Lau, P. (2000). A possible role of bats as a blood source for the Leishmania vector Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae). American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 62, 718719.Google Scholar
Lemos, J. C. and Lima, S. C. (2005). American cutaneous leishmaniasis: phlebotomine transmission area in the Municipality of Uberlandia, MG. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 38, 2226.Google Scholar
Li, W., Shi, Z., Yu, M., Ren, W., Smith, C., Epstein, J. H., Wang, H., Crameri, G., Hu, Z., Zhang, H., Zhang, J., McEachern, J., Field, H., Daszak, P., Eaton, B. T., Zhang, S. and Wang, L. F. (2005). Bats are natural reservoirs of SARS-like coronaviruses. Science 310, 676-679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, B., Liu, Y., Motyka, S. A., Agbo, E. E. and Englund, P. T. (2005). Fellowship of the rings: the replication of kinetoplast DNA. Trends in Parasitology 21, 363369.Google Scholar
Luyo-Acero, G. E., Uezato, H., Oshiro, M., Takei, K., Kariya, K., Katakura, K., Gomez-Landires, E., Hashiguchi, Y. and Nonaka, S. (2004). Sequence variation of the cytochrome b gene of various human infecting members of the genus Leishmania and their phylogeny. Parasitology 128, 483491.Google Scholar
Marcili, A., Speranca, M. A., da Costa, A. P., Madeira Mde, F., Soares, H. S., Sanches Cde, O., Acosta Ida, C., Girotto, A., Minervino, A. H., Horta, M. C., Shaw, J. J. and Gennari, S. M. (2014). Phylogenetic relationships of Leishmania species based on trypanosomatid barcode (SSU rDNA) and gGAPDH genes: taxonomic revision of Leishmania (L.) infantum chagasi in South America. Infection Genetics and Evolution 25, 44-51.Google Scholar
Marfurt, J., Nasereddin, A., Niederwieser, I., Jaffe, C. L., Beck, H. P. and Felger, I. (2003). Identification and differentiation of Leishmania species in clinical samples by PCR amplification of the miniexon sequence and subsequent restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 41, 31473153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marinkellei, C. J. (1982). Prevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi-like infection of Colombian bats. Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology 76, 125134.Google Scholar
Marques, M. J., Volpini, A. C., Genaro, O., Mayrink, W. and Romanha, A. J. (2001). Simple form of clinical sample preservation and Leishmania DNA extraction from human lesions for diagnosis of American cutaneous leishmaniasis via polymerase chain reaction. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 65, 902906.Google Scholar
Millan, J., Ferroglio, E. and Solano-Gallego, L. (2014a). Role of wildlife in the epidemiology of Leishmania infantum infection in Europe. Parasitology Research 113, 20052014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millan, J., Lopez-Roig, M., Cabezon, O. and Serra-Cobo, J. (2014b). Absence of Leishmania infantum in cave bats in an endemic area in Spain. Parasitology Research 113, 19931995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohammadiha, A., Mohebali, M., Haghighi, A., Mahdian, R., Abadi, A. R., Zarei, Z., Yeganeh, F., Kazemi, B., Taghipour, N. and Akhoundi, B. (2013). Comparison of real-time PCR and conventional PCR with two DNA targets for detection of Leishmania (Leishmania) infantum infection in human and dog blood samples. Experimental Parasitology 133, 8994.Google Scholar
Molyneux, A. J. (1991). Trypanosomes of bats. In Parasitic Protozoa (ed. Kreier, J. P. and Baker, J. R.), pp. 95223. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Montalvo, A. M., Fraga, J., El Safi, S., Gramiccia, M., Jaffe, C. L., Dujardin, J. C. and Van der Auwera, G. (2014). Direct Leishmania species typing in Old World clinical samples: evaluation of 3 sensitive methods based on the heat-shock protein 70 gene. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 80, 3539.Google Scholar
Morsy, T. A., Salama, M. M. and Abdel Hamid, M. Y. (1987). Detection of Leishmania antibodies in bats. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology 17, 797798.Google Scholar
Motta, P. E. F. (1993). Os solos do Triângulo Mineiro e sua aptidão agrícola. Informe Agropecuario 9(105), 5763. Belo Horizonte, BR.Google Scholar
Mutinga, M. J. (1975). The animal reservoir of cutaneous leishmaniasis on Mount Elgon, Kenya. East African Medical Journal 52, 142151.Google Scholar
Nicolas, L., Prina, E., Lang, T. and Milon, G. (2002). Real-time PCR for detection and quantitation of leishmania in mouse tissues. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 40, 16661669.Google Scholar
Ovalle Bracho, C., Porras de Quintana, L., Muvdi Arenas, S. and Rios Parra, M. (2007). Polymerase chain reaction with two molecular targets in mucosal leishmaniasis’ diagnosis: a validation study. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 102, 549554.Google Scholar
Paula, M. B., Souza, A. A., dos Reis, A. A., Limongi, J. E., Pajuaba Neto Ade, A. and Rodrigues Ede, A. (2013). Survey of sandfly fauna (Diptera: Psychodidae) in Uberlandia, Minas Gerais State, Brazil, 2003–2004. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo 55, 8589.Google Scholar
Pinto, C. M., Ocana-Mayorga, S., Tapia, E. E., Lobos, S. E., Zurita, A. P., Aguirre-Villacis, F., MacDonald, A., Villacis, A. G., Lima, L., Teixeira, M. M., Grijalva, M. J. and Perkins, S. L. (2015). Bats, trypanosomes, and triatomines in ecuador: new insights into the diversity, transmission, and origins of Trypanosoma cruzi and chagas disease. PLoS ONE 10, e0139999.Google Scholar
Rajendran, P., Chatterjee, S. N., Dhanda, V. and Dhiman, R. C. (1985). Observations on the role of vespertilionid bats in relation to non-human vertebrate reservoir in Indian kala-azar. Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology 28, 153158.Google Scholar
Ramirez, J. D. and Llewellyn, M. S. (2014). Reproductive clonality in protozoan pathogens--truth or artefact? Molecular Ecology 23, 41954202.Google Scholar
Ramirez, J. L. and Galetti, P. M. Jr. (2015). DNA barcode and evolutionary relationship within Laemolyta Cope 1872 (Characiformes: Anostomidae) through molecular analyses. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 93, 7782.Google Scholar
Ramirez, J. D., Hernandez, C., Leon, C. M., Ayala, M. S., Florez, C. and Gonzalez, C. (2016). Taxonomy, diversity, temporal and geographical distribution of cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Colombia: a retrospective study. Scientific Reports 6, 28266.Google Scholar
Reis, N. R., Peracchi, A. L., Pedro, W. A. and Lima, I. P. (2007). Morcegos do Brasil, 1st edn. Londrina, BR.Google Scholar
Rizzini, C. T. (1997). Tratado de Fitogeografia do Brasil: aspectos ecológicos, sociológicos e florísticos. 2nd edn. Âmbito Cultural Edições, Rio de Janeiro, BR.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, N., De Lima, H., Aguilar, C. M., Rodriguez, A., Barker, D. C. and Convit, J. (2002). Molecular epidemiology of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Venezuela. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 96(Suppl. 1), S105S109.Google Scholar
Rotureau, B., Catzeflis, F. and Carme, B. (2006). Absence of leishmania in Guianan bats. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 74, 318321.Google Scholar
Savani, E. S., de Almeida, M. F., de Oliveira Camargo, M. C., D'Auria, S. R., Silva, M. M., de Oliveira, M. L. and Sacramento, D. (2010). Detection of Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis and Leishmania (Leishmania) infantum chagasi in Brazilian bats. Veterinary Parasitology 168, 510.Google Scholar
Shahbazi, F., Shahabi, S., Kazemi, B., Mohebali, M., Abadi, A. R. and Zare, Z. (2008). Evaluation of PCR assay in diagnosis and identification of cutaneous leishmaniasis: a comparison with the parasitological methods. Parasitology Research 103, 11591162.Google Scholar
Shapiro, J. T., da Costa Lima Junior, M. S., Dorval, M. E., de Oliveira Franca, A., Cepa Matos Mde, F. and Bordignon, M. O. (2013). First record of Leishmania braziliensis presence detected in bats, Mato Grosso do Sul, southwest Brazil. Acta Tropica 128, 171174.Google Scholar
Thompson, P. N. and Etter, E. (2015). Epidemiological surveillance methods for vector-borne diseases. Revue Scientifique et Technique 34, 235247.Google Scholar
Vizotto, L. D. and Taddei, V. A. (1973). Chave para determinação de quirópteros brasileiros. Revista Faculdade Filosofia Ciências Letras São José do Rio Preto, 1, 172.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Bat species captured in Minas Gerais, Brazil by family, feeding habits and county origin

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Molecular phylogenetic analysis by the maximum-likelihood (ML) method. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the ML method based on the Tamura–Nei model. The tree with the highest log likelihood (−2763,0697) is shown. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying Neighbour-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the maximum composite likelihood (MCL) approach, and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value. The analysis involved 61 nucleotide sequences. Codon positions included were 1st+2nd+3rd+Non-coding. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There were a total of 405 positions in the final dataset. Black dots indicate bootstrap values over 80%.

Figure 2

Table 2. Positivity for Leishmania species in bats captured in Minas Gerais, Brazil