Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T21:48:34.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Letter from the Guest Editor

Part of: IntCal 20

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2020

Paula J Reimer*
Affiliation:
The 14CHRONO Centre for Climate, the Environment and Chronology, School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen’s University Belfast BT7 1NN, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Other
Copyright
© 2020 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona

We have seen remarkable advances in our understanding of the Earth’s systems, as well as the proliferation of high quality radiocarbon calibration data, since the publication of the first calibration curves constructed by the IntCal Working Group in 2004. In this issue we present the 2020 Northern and Southern Hemisphere terrestrial and marine calibration curves (Reimer et al. 2020; Hogg et al. 2020; Heaton et al. 2020b), as well as a new, custom-designed Bayesian statistical method for curve construction (Heaton et al. 2020a).

In addition the reader will find papers detailing a tree-ring radiocarbon inter-comparison exercise (Wacker et al. 2020), a discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the selected tree-ring data (Bayliss et al. 2020) and a number of papers presenting new data for single year tree-ring measurements for the Holocene (Fahrni et al. 2020; Friedrich et al. 2020; Kudsk et al. 2019; Kuitems et al. 2020; Pearson et al. 2020). A dendrochronological extension and 14C measurements of the Late Glacial European Preboreal Pine chronology is presented by Reinig et al. (2020) and Sookdeo et al. (2019). Dendrochronology and 14C measurements of Late Glacial floating tree-rings from the Alps are given by Capano et al. (2019). Updates to the timescales for the Lake Suigetsu varved and the Cariaco basin sedimentrecords are described in Bronk Ramsey et al. (2020) and Hughen & Heaton (2020). The Marine Reservoir Ages calculated with an ocean general circulation model for each region with marine data used in IntCal20 is given by Butzin et al. (2020).

A comparison of the IntCal20 curve with independently dated events as well as a transfer function for converting between the IntCal20 timescale (primarily based on U-Th dates for the older portion of the curve) and the Greenland Ice Core Chronology (GICC05) is presented in Muscheler et al. (2020). The effect of the IntCal20 curve on some important examples of previously published radiocarbon ages is highlighted in van der Plicht et al. (2020).

This is the seventh radiocarbon calibration issue that I’ve had the pleasure of seeing come together under the lead of either Minze Stuiver or myself. I have had a great experience working with an amazing group of people to produce this latest update to the radiocarbon calibration curves. I am confident that the IntCal Working Group will continue to work together to provide the user community with ever improving calibration curves under the capable leadership of Christopher Bronk Ramsey.

References

REFERENCES

Bayliss, A, Marshall, P, Friedrich, M, Dee, M, Heaton, TJ, Bollhanger, S, Wacker, L. 2020. IntCal20 tree rings: an archaeological SWOT analysis. Radiocarbon 62. This issue. doi:10.1017/RDC.2020.77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Heaton, TJ, Schlolaut, G, Staff, RA, Bryant, CL, Brauer, A, Lamb, HF, Marshall, MH, Nakagawa, T. 2020. Reanalysis of the atmospheric radiocarbon calibration record from Lake Suigetsu, Japan. Radiocarbon 62. This issue. doi:10.1017/RDC.2020.18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butzin, M, Heaton, TJ, Kohler, P, Lohmann, G. 2020. A short note on marine reservoir age simulations used in IntCal20. Radiocarbon 62. This issue. doi:10.1017/RDC.2020.9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capano, M, Miramont, C, Shindo, L, Guibal, F, Marschal, C, Kromer, B, Tuna, T, Bard, E. 2019. Onset of the Younger Dryas recorded with 14C at annual resolution in French subfossil trees. Radiocarbon 62. This issue. doi:10.1017/RDC.2019.116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahrni, SM, Southon, J, Fuller, BT, Park, J, Friedrich, M, Muscheler, R, Wacker, L, Taylor, RE. 2020. Single-year German oak and Californian bristlecone pine 14C data at the beginning of the Hallstatt plateau from 856 BC to 626 BC. Radiocarbon 62. This issue. doi:10.1017/RDC.2020.16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, R, Kromer, B, Wacker, L, Olsen, J, Remmele, S, Lindauer, S, Land, A, Pearson, C. 2020. A new annual 14C dataset for calibrating the Thera eruption. Radiocarbon 62. This issue. doi: 10.1017/RDC.2020.33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heaton, TJ, Blaauw, M, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Reimer, PJ, Scott, EM. 2020a. The IntCal20 approach to radiocarbon calibration curve construction: a new methodology using Bayesian splines and errors-in-variables. Radiocarbon 62. This issue. doi: 10.1017/RDC.2020.46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heaton, TJ, Kohler, P, Butzin, M, Bard, E, Reimer, RW, Austin, WEN, Bronk Ramsey, C, Grootes, PM, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, Reimer, PJ, Adkins, J, Burke, A, Cook, MS, Olsen, J, Skinner, LC. 2020b. Marine20—the marine radiocarbon age calibration curve (0–55,000 cal BP). Radiocarbon 62. This issue. doi: 10.1017/RDC.2020.68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, AG, Heaton, TJ, Hua, Q, Palmer, JG, Turney, CSM, Southon, J, Bayliss, A, Blackwell, PG, Boswijk, G, Bronk Ramsey, C, Pearson, C, Petchey, F, Reimer, P, Reimer, R, Wacker, L. 2020. SHCal20 Southern Hemisphere calibration, 0.55,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 62. This issue. doi: 10.1017/RDC.2020.59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughen, K, Heaton, TJ. 2020. Updated Cariaco Basin 14C calibration dataset from 0.60 cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon 62. This issue. doi:10.1017/RDC.2020.53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudsk, SGK, Philippsen, B, Baittinger, C, Fogtmann-Schulz, A, Knudsen, M, Karoff, CA, Olsen, J. 2019. New single-year radiocarbon measurements based on Danish oak covering the periods AD 692–790 and 966–1057 AD. Radiocarbon 62. This issue. doi:10.1017/RDC.2019.107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuitems, M, van der Plicht, J, Jansma, E. 2020. Wood from the Netherlands around the time of the Santorini eruption dated by dendrochronology and radiocarbon. Radiocarbon 62. This issue. doi:10.1017/RDC.2020.23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muscheler, R, Adolphi, F, Heaton, TJ, Bronk Ramsey, C, Svensson, A, van der Plicht, J, Reimer, PJ. 2020. Testing and improving the 14C calibration curve with independent records. Radiocarbon 62. This issue. doi:10.1017/RDC.2020.54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, CL, Wacker, L, Bayliss, A, Brown, DM, Salzer, M, Brewer, PW, Bollhalder, S, Boswijk, G, Hodgins, GWL. 2020. Annual variation in atmospheric 14C between 1700 BC and 1480 BC. Radiocarbon 62. This issue. doi:10.1017/RDC.2020.14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Austin, WEN, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Butzin, M, Cheng, H, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Hajdas, I, Heaton, TJ, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, Manning, SW, Muscheler, R, Palmer, JG, Pearson, C, van der Plicht, J, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Scott, EM, Southon, JR, Turney, CSM, Wacker, L, Adolphi, F, Buntgen, U, Capano, M, Fahrni, S, Fogtmann-Schulz, A, Friedrich, R, Kohler, P, Kudsk, S, Miyake, F, Olsen, J, Reinig, F, Sakamoto, M, Sookdeo, A, Talamo, S. 2020. The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere radiocarbon age calibration curve (0–55 cal kBP). Radiocarbon 62. This issue. doi:10.1017/RDC.2020.41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinig, F, Sookdeo, A, Esper, J, Friedrich, M, Guidobaldi, G, Helle, G, Kromer, B, Nievergelt, D, Pauly, M, Tegel, W, Treydte, K, Wacker, L, Büntgen, U. 2020. Illuminating IntCal during the Younger Dryas. Radiocarbon 62. This issue. doi:10.1017/RDC.2020.15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sookdeo, A, Kromer, B, Büntgen, U, Friedrich, M, Friedrich, R, Helle, G, Pauly, M, Nievergelt, D, Reinig, F, Treydte, K, Synal, H-A, Wacker, L. 2019. Quality Dating: A well-defined protocol implemented at ETH for high-precision 14C dates tested on Late Glacial wood. Radiocarbon 62. This issue. doi:10.1017/RDC.2019.132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Plicht, J, Bronk Ramsey, C, Heaton, TJ, Scott, EM, Talamo, S. 2020. Recent developments in calibration for archaeological and environmental samples. Radiocarbon 62. This issue. doi:10.1017/RDC.2020.22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacker, L, Scott, EM, Bayliss, A, Brown, D, Bard, E, Bollhalder, S, Friedrich, M, Capano, M, Cherkinsky, A, Chivall, D, Culleton, BJ, Dee, MW, Friedrich, R, Hodgins, GWL, Hogg, A, Kennett, DJ, Knowles, TDJ, Kuitems, M, Lange, TE, Miyake, F, Nadeau, M-J, Nakamura, T, Naysmith, JP, Olsen, J, Omori, T, Petchey, F, Philippsen, B, Ramsey, CB, Prasad, GVR, Seiler, M, Southon, J, Staff, R, Tuna, T. 2020. Findings from an in-depth annual tree ring radiocarbon intercomparison. Radiocarbon 62. This issue. doi:10.1017/RDC.2020.49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar