Hostname: page-component-6dbcb7884d-2bcm2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-13T18:13:46.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pragmatic leadership: A return to wisdom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2013

Diane Ruwhiu  and
Malcolm Cone
Diane Ruwhiu*
Affiliation:
Department of Management, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
Malcolm Cone
Affiliation:
Department of Management, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
*
Corresponding author: diane.ruwhiu@otago.ac.nz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Te Ao Māori, or the Māori world, locates Māori philosophy, ethics and knowledge (wisdom) in a central role, and is therefore foundational to Māori thinking and practice. In this article, we present an example of pragmatic leadership, using the epistemological and ontological space of kaupapa Māori, a perspective that represents practice guided by the wisdom of Te Ao Māori. To do so, we draw from narrative shared by 22 Māori practitioners involved in leadership roles in a wide range of organisations to illustrate key features of Māori leadership practice. We argue that this approach offers a unique contribution and deeper understanding to the contemporary and instrumental representation of pragmatic leadership. Such a perspective allows researchers to explore leadership practices, particularly those that may be heavily influenced by culturally specific behaviours. In regards to practitioners, it provides foundation for innovative leadership practices grounded on giving weight to more deeply contextualised processes and relations. The consequences are widespread not only for researchers and practitioners of leadership, but also for a perception of indigenous leadership that is true to the indigenous logics in which they are grounded and reflective of good practice.

Keywords

pragmatic leadershipMāori leadershipkaupapa Māori researchpractical wisdom
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 25 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alves, J. C., Manz, C. C., Butterfield, D. A. (2005). Developing leadership theory in Asia: The role of Chinese philosophy. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 1(1), 3–27.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M. (1996). Leadership studies: From procedure and abstraction to reflexivity and situation. Leadership Quarterly, 7(4), 455–485.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M. (2003). Beyond neopositivists, romantics, and localists: A reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research. The Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 13–33.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M., Sveningsson, S. (2003). The great disappearing act: Difficulties in doing “leadership”. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 359–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, R. (2002). Observing ritual “propriety li” as focusing the “familiar” in the affairs of the day. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, 1(2), 146–156.Google Scholar
Ames, R. (2003). Confucianism and Deweyian pragmatism: A dialogue. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 30(3–4), 403–417.Google Scholar
Ashar, H., Lane-Maher, M. (2004). Success and spirituality in the new business paradigm. Journal of Management Inquiry, 13(3), 249–260.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M.M. Bakhtin, ed. Michael Holquist, trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press. (cited p. 10 of Lieblich, A.,Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative Research: Reading, Analysis and Interpretation (Vol. 47). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.)Google Scholar
Bedell-Avers, K., Hunter, S. T., Angie, A. D., Eubanks, D. L., Mumford, M. D. (2009). Charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders: An examination of leader–leader interactions. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 299–315. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.014Google Scholar
Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Needham Heights, MA: Pearson Education Company.Google Scholar
Bishop, R. (1996). Collaborative research stories. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.Google Scholar
Bishop, R. (2008). Te Kotahitanga: Kaupapa Māori in mainstream classrooms. In N. Denzin, Y. Lincoln, & L. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1991). The peculiar history of scientific reason. Sociological Forum, 6(1), 3–26.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bradbury, H., Lichtenstein, B. (2000). Relationality in organizational research: Exploring the space between. Organization Science, 11(5), 551–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, J., Tesluk, P., Marrone, J. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1217–1234.Google Scholar
Clandinin, D. J., Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Clegg, S. R., Ross-Smith, A. (2003). Revising the boundaries: Management education and learning in a postpositivist world. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2(1), 85–98.Google Scholar
Cook, S., Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381–400.Google Scholar
Dachler, H. P., Hosking, D. M. (1995). The primacy of relations in socially constructed organizational realities. In D. M. Hosking, H. P. Dachler, & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), Management and organization: Relational alternatives to individualism (pp. 1–28). Brookfield, WI: Avebury.Google Scholar
Deetz, S. (1996). Describing differences in approaches to organization science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy. Organization Science, 7(2), 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y., Smith, L. (2008). Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Diamond, P. (2003). A fire in your belly: Māori leaders speak. Wellington: Huia.Google Scholar
Drath, W., McCauley, C., Palus, C., Van Velsor, E., O'Connor, P., McGuire, J. (2008). Direction, alignment, commitment: Toward a more integrative ontology of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 635–653.Google Scholar
Durie, M. (2005). Ngā tai matatū: Tides of Māori endurance. Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fang, T. (2003). A critique of Hofstede's fifth national culture dimension. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 3(3), 347–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, A. (2002). Using individualism and collectivism to compare cultures – A critique of the validity and measurement of the constructs: Comment on Oyserman et al. (2002). Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 78–88.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Making organization research matter: Power, values and phronesis. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. Lawrence, & W. Nord (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organization studies (2nd edn., pp. 370–387). London, England: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foldy, E., Goldman, L., Ospina, S. (2008). Sensegiving and the role of cognitive shifts in the work of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 514–529.Google Scholar
Ford, J. (2006). Discourses of leadership: Gender, identity and contradiction in a UK public sector organization. Leadership, 2(77), 77–99.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London, England: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 3, 481–510.Google Scholar
Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M. (2011). Constructions of leadership at the intersection of discourse, power and culture: Jamaican manager's narratives of leading in a postcolonial cultural context. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(4), 612–643.Google Scholar
Hay, A., Hodgkinson, M. (2006). Rethinking leadership: A way forward for teaching leadership? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 27(2), 144–458.Google Scholar
Henare, M. (2001). Tapu, mana, mauri, hau, wairua. A Māori philosophy of vitalism and cosmos. In J. A. Grimm (Ed.), Indigenous traditions and ecology: The interbeing of cosmology and community (pp. 197–221). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Henry, E., Pene, H. (2001). Kaupapa Māori: Locating indigenous ontology, epistemology and methodology in the academy. Organization, 8(2), 234–242.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (2007). Humour and the construction of Māori leadership at work. Leadership, 3(5), 5–27.Google Scholar
Hosking, D. M., Bouwen, R. (2000). Organizational learning: Relational-constructionist approaches: An overview. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9(2), 129–132.Google Scholar
Hosking, D. M., Dachler, H. P., Gergen, K. J. (1995). Management and organization: Relational alternatives to individualism. Brookfield, WI: Avebury.Google Scholar
Jabri, M. (2009). Promoting exchange between East and West management cultures: The role of dialogue. Journal of Management & Organization, 15(4), 514–525.Google Scholar
Knights, D., O'Leary, (2006). Leadership, ethics and responsibility to the other. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(2), 125–137.Google Scholar
Knights, D., Willmott, H. (1990). Labour process theory. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Knights, D., Willmott, H. (1992). Conceptualizing leadership processes: A study of senior managers in a financial services company. Journal of Management Studies, 29(6), 761–782.Google Scholar
Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis and interpretation (Vol. 47). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ligon, G., Hunter, S., Mumford, M. (2008). Development of outstanding leadership: A life narrative approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 312–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue: A study in moral theory. London, England: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Markus, H., Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, M. (2003). The woven universe: Selected readings of Rev. Māori Marsden. Otaki: The Estate of Rev. Māori Marsden.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. (2006). Pathways to outstanding leadership: A comparative analysis of charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mumford, M., Antes, A., Caughron, J., Friedrich, T. (2008). Charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leadership: Multi-level influences on emergence and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 144–160.Google Scholar
Mumford, M., Van Doorn, J. (2001). The leadership of pragmatism: Reconsidering Franklin in the age of charisma. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 279–309.Google Scholar
Ospina, S., Foldy, E. (2010). Building bridges from the margins: The work of leadership in social change organizations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 292–307.Google Scholar
Parameshwar, S. (2005). Spiritual leadership through ego-transcendence: Exceptional responses to challenging circumstances. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 689–722.Google Scholar
Petrie, H. (2006). Chiefs of industry: Māori tribal enterprise in early colonial New Zealand. Auckland: Auckland University Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. (1945). Origins of our time: The great transformation. London, England: Gollanz.Google Scholar
Pratt, S. (2002). Native pragmatism: Rethinking the roots of American philosophy. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Raelin, J. A. (2007). Toward an epistemology of practice. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(4), 495–519.Google Scholar
Roberts, M., Haami, B., Benton, R., Satterfield, T., Finucane, M., Henare, M., Henare, M. (2004). Whakapapa as a Māori mental construct: Some implications for the debate over genetic modification of organisms. The Contemporary Pacific, 16(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roca, E. (2007). Introducing practical wisdom in business schools. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 607–620.Google Scholar
Ropo, A., Sauer, E. (2008). Dances of leadership: Bridging theory and practice through an aesthetic approach. Journal of Management & Organization, 14(5), 560–572.Google Scholar
Royal, T. C. (1998). Mātauranga Māori: Paradigms and politics. A paper presented to the Ministry for Research, Science and Technology. Te Wānanga-o-Raukawa, Otaki. Retrieved from www.charles-royal.com/default.aspx?Page=127Google Scholar
Ruwhiu, D., Cone, M. (2010). Advancing a pragmatist epistemology in organisational research. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 5(2), 108–126.Google Scholar
Scandura, T., Dorfman, P. (2004). Leadership research in an international and cross-cultural context. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 277–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shalin, D. N. (1986). Pragmatism and social interactionism. American Sociological Review, 51(1), 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies. Dunedin: University of Otago Press.Google Scholar
Spiller, C., Erakovic, L., Henare, M., Pio, E. (2011). Relational well-being and wealth: Māori businesses and an ethic of care. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1), 153–169.Google Scholar
Steier, F. (1991). Research and reflexivity. London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
Strange, J., Mumford, M. (2002). The origins of vision: Charismatic versus ideological leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 343–377.Google Scholar
Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273–286.Google Scholar
Tomlins-Jahnke, H. (2005). He huarahi motuhake: The politics of tribal agency in provider services. Palmerston North: Doctor of Philosophy Doctoral Thesis Massey University.Google Scholar
Tsoukas, H., Cummings, S. (1997). Marginalization and recovery: The emergence of Aristotelian themes in organization studies. Organization Studies, 18(4), 655–683.Google Scholar
Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 654–676.Google Scholar
Van Maanen, J., Sorensen, J. B., Mitchell, T. R. (2007). The interplay between theory and method. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1145–1154.Google Scholar
Verbos, A. K., Gladstone, J. S., Kennedy, D. M. (2011). Native American values and management education: Envisioning an inclusive virtuous circle. Journal of Management Education, 20(10), 1–17.Google Scholar
Walker, S., Eketone, A., Gibb, A. (2006). An exploration of kaupapa Māori research, its principles, processes and applications. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9(4), 331–344.Google Scholar
Warner, L. S., Grint, K. (2006). American Indian ways of leading and knowing. Leadership, 2(2), 225–244.Google Scholar
Wasserman, S., Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and application. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wicks, A., Freeman, R. E. (1998). Organization studies and the new pragmatism: Positivism, anti-positivism, and the search for ethics. Organization Science, 9(2), 123–140.Google Scholar
Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. Journal of Management, 15(2), 251–289.Google Scholar
Zhang, H., Cone, M., Everett, A., Elkin, A. (2011). Aesthetic leadership in Chinese business: A philosophical perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 475–491.Google Scholar