Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T06:22:51.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Falerii Novi Project: the 2021 Season

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2022

Seth Bernard
Affiliation:
(University of Toronto; Harvard University; British School at Rome; British School at Rome; British School at Rome; University of Cambridge; Ghent University) seth.bernard@utoronto.ca; margaretandrews@fas.harvard.edu; letizia.ceccarelli@gmail.com; adarchaeology@bsrome.it; s.kay@bsrome.it; nl343@cam.ac.uk; Frank.Vermeulen@UGent.be
Margaret Andrews
Affiliation:
(University of Toronto; Harvard University; British School at Rome; British School at Rome; British School at Rome; University of Cambridge; Ghent University) seth.bernard@utoronto.ca; margaretandrews@fas.harvard.edu; letizia.ceccarelli@gmail.com; adarchaeology@bsrome.it; s.kay@bsrome.it; nl343@cam.ac.uk; Frank.Vermeulen@UGent.be
Letizia Ceccarelli
Affiliation:
(University of Toronto; Harvard University; British School at Rome; British School at Rome; British School at Rome; University of Cambridge; Ghent University) seth.bernard@utoronto.ca; margaretandrews@fas.harvard.edu; letizia.ceccarelli@gmail.com; adarchaeology@bsrome.it; s.kay@bsrome.it; nl343@cam.ac.uk; Frank.Vermeulen@UGent.be
Emlyn Dodd
Affiliation:
(University of Toronto; Harvard University; British School at Rome; British School at Rome; British School at Rome; University of Cambridge; Ghent University) seth.bernard@utoronto.ca; margaretandrews@fas.harvard.edu; letizia.ceccarelli@gmail.com; adarchaeology@bsrome.it; s.kay@bsrome.it; nl343@cam.ac.uk; Frank.Vermeulen@UGent.be
Stephen Kay
Affiliation:
(University of Toronto; Harvard University; British School at Rome; British School at Rome; British School at Rome; University of Cambridge; Ghent University) seth.bernard@utoronto.ca; margaretandrews@fas.harvard.edu; letizia.ceccarelli@gmail.com; adarchaeology@bsrome.it; s.kay@bsrome.it; nl343@cam.ac.uk; Frank.Vermeulen@UGent.be
Ninetta Leone
Affiliation:
(University of Toronto; Harvard University; British School at Rome; British School at Rome; British School at Rome; University of Cambridge; Ghent University) seth.bernard@utoronto.ca; margaretandrews@fas.harvard.edu; letizia.ceccarelli@gmail.com; adarchaeology@bsrome.it; s.kay@bsrome.it; nl343@cam.ac.uk; Frank.Vermeulen@UGent.be
Frank Vermeulen
Affiliation:
(University of Toronto; Harvard University; British School at Rome; British School at Rome; British School at Rome; University of Cambridge; Ghent University) seth.bernard@utoronto.ca; margaretandrews@fas.harvard.edu; letizia.ceccarelli@gmail.com; adarchaeology@bsrome.it; s.kay@bsrome.it; nl343@cam.ac.uk; Frank.Vermeulen@UGent.be

Abstract

Type
Archaeological Fieldwork Reports
Copyright
Copyright © British School at Rome 2022

A two-week campaign in June 2021 marked the beginning of a planned multi-year project at the Roman city of Falerii Novi, located in the Comune of Fabrica di Roma (Viterbo, Lazio), in the middle Tiber Valley. The project takes place under the authorization of the Soprintendenza Archeologia, Belle Arti e Paesaggio per la Provincia di Viterbo e per l'Etruria Meridionale and is a collaboration between the British School at Rome (BSR) and the Universities of Harvard and Toronto, along with researchers from the Universities of Ghent and Florence.Footnote 1

According to historical sources, Falerii Novi was founded after Rome's destruction of the nearby Faliscan centre of Falerii Veteres in 241 BC (Polyb. 1.65; Liv. Epit. 20; Zon. 8.18). The urban site along the via Amerina persisted at least until the first half of the sixth century AD, becoming a bishopric in AD 465. In the twelfth century, a monastery and church of Santa Maria di Falleri were added and now represent the only standing structure on site other than the ancient circuit walls.

Falerii Novi and its territory have long been a subject of archaeological study by the BSR – first through the exploration of the Roman Campagna by Thomas Ashby and, following that, the surveys of John Ward-Perkins as part of the pioneering South Etruria Survey (Frederiksen and Ward-Perkins, Reference Frederiksen and Ward-Perkins1957). As part of the BSR's Tiber Valley Project starting in the late 1990s, the intramural area (c. 32 ha) was explored using a variety of non-invasive methodologies (Keay et al., Reference Keay, Millett, Poppy, Robinson, Taylor and Terrenato2000). The most recent publication of this work consists of a detailed plan of the town based on high-resolution Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) survey by a team from the Universities of Ghent and Cambridge (Verdonck et al., Reference Verdonck, Launaro, Vermeulen and Millett2020). In the 19th century the site was subject to a number of antiquarian excavations, most notably of the theatre and forum, skilfully repositioned by Di Stefano Manzella (Reference Di Stefano Manzella1979). Between 1969–75 part of an insula was also examined by the Soprintendenza, the unpublished excavations of which are now part of a restudy by the project. More recently, small-scale excavations were also undertaken around the church and towards the northern gate along the via Amerina (De Lucia Brolli, Reference De Lucia Brolli1995).

Research to date raises a number of questions about the city's relationship to settlement trends in the wider Tiber Valley, as well as about Falerii's own development (Millett, Reference Millett2007; Biella, Reference Biella and Biella2020): was there a pre-existing Faliscan settlement, what is the chronology of the city's infrastructure, and what can be known about Falerii's last urban phases? The new ‘Falerii Novi Project’ seeks to address these and related questions through targeted stratigraphic excavation.

The two-week season in 2021 aimed to refine our understanding of the site's configuration and chronological development and aid in locating excavation trenches for the following years. Two approaches were selected. One team of researchers from the BSR along with colleagues from the Universities of Harvard and Toronto carried out a shovel testing pit campaign across the extent of the intramural site. A second team from the University of Ghent simultaneously undertook a series of cores along two main axes of the site, as well as over a structure to the west of the forum interpreted as a macellum from GPR survey results. In addition, GPR survey was carried out in two zones north and northwest of the church surveyed in 2015–2017 (Verdonck et al., Reference Verdonck, Launaro, Vermeulen and Millett2020). Results in drier conditions and with better spatial resolution revealed few differences compared to earlier data from these zones.

The test pit campaign was designed based on a similar project at Interamna Lirenas and in consultation with Alessandro Launaro and Martin Millett (Bellini et al., Reference Bellini, Hay, Launaro, Leone and Millett2012). The goal was to replicate a field-walking survey by collecting material in the plough zone across the full extent of the intramural area. Limited surface collection was carried out in the 1990s, both low resolution across the entire intramural area and at a higher resolution in a focused area over the forum and insulae just to the south (Keay et al., Reference Keay, Millett, Poppy, Robinson, Taylor and Terrenato2000: 70–75). The continuous working of the site for agriculture over the last decades, however, limits the diagnostic potential of material still found on the surface. Using GIS, Falerii's intramural area was covered with a grid of small trenches measuring 50 × 50 cm at 50 m intervals. A single row of trenches spaced 25 m apart was dug in the northern half of the site to support augering, and an additional trench was dug in the area of a structure interpreted as a macellum from the GPR survey (Fig. 1). In total, 145 trenches were excavated across the site. The corners of each were marked on the ground according to GPS coordinates, and an initial elevation was taken. Excavation was carried out to a depth of 30 cm to reach the bottom of the plough zone using picks and shovels. When archaeological layers were reached at a shallower depth, excavation was stopped. Removed soil was sieved, and artificial objects were recorded. Photographs and elevations were taken, and trenches were backfilled. Larger (1 x 1 m) pits were dug down to archaeological layers over a structure identified as a large domus south of the Forum (D1) and over the area of the possible macellum (M1-2). First indications of archaeological layers were reached in all three cases at a depth of ca. 40 cm.

Figure 1. Plan of Falerii Novi showing location of test pits and augers. Image by Elena Pomar.

The test pits yielded 2,075 fragments of ceramic, 650 of tile, 67 fragments of glass, 23 of metal, 214 tesserae and 1 coin. The eastern extent of the city yielded less material, while greater quantities of material were found in the area around the forum and in the north and northwest. In general, the chronology of the ceramics recovered indicates continuous occupation from the third century BC to the sixth century AD, with an apparent gap until the ninth to twelfth century AD. This chronology accords with the documented history of the site, but systematic excavation in the following years will naturally refine these preliminary results. Among non-ceramic finds, black and white mosaic tesserae were common, especially in the northern area. Metal and ceramic slag from several pits as well as a firing support suggest a range of productive activities. The coin from the area of the macellum (M1) is a later Imperial bronze commemorative issue struck by Constantine I ca. 317 featuring Claudius II (cf. RIC VII 112).

The augering survey was carried out to clarify the site's geological qualities, verify particular features detected by previous survey, and determine the depth and type of archaeological deposits. In addition, samples were collected for environmental analysis. 46 boreholes were carried out with Eijkelkamp hand augers along east–west and north–south transects (Fig. 1). Ten augerings were also made above the possible macellum. Achieved depth ranged from 40 cm to 560 cm. Boreholes’ locations were documented, and depth, sorting, texture, colour, boundary characteristics, and inclusions were recorded for sedimentary units. Ceramics were collected and building materials (tiles, brick) were noted, but not systematically retained, except mortar. Bulk samples and samples of charcoal and organic material were also taken. 114 samples of pottery, bone, glass, charcoal, pollen, etc. were collected for study. Noteworthy is the recovery of a small fragment of a red-figured oinochoe (dating to the early third century BC) from auger 35 in the area of the so-called capitolium at the northwest of the site.

Along the east–west transect, archaeological deposits reach a depth of more than 200 cm (in auger 31, even 300 cm, Fig. 1). This is particularly true for the sector of the so-called capitolium, illustrating the good state of preservation of subsurface archaeology. Archaeological deposits in the eastern city are thinner and even absent in certain augerings, perhaps resulting from erosion facilitated by the presence of the northeastern town gate. Augerings along the north–south transect show that archaeological deposits reach thicknesses of 200–230 cm. The augerings conducted in the southwestern part of the possible macellum revealed a sequence of two layers with large amounts of mortar, possibly the remains of two floor levels at depths of 50–60 and 100 cm, separated by a layer of tuff fragments.

In June 2022, the project will commence large-scale open area excavation focused on three key areas: the macellum, the domus south of the forum, and an insula and intersection along the via Amerina near the south gate. This work will be complemented by continued augering within the walls and extended GPR survey of extramural areas to the city's south, complementing previous work outside the north wall (Hay et al., Reference Hay, Johnson, Keay and Millett2010).

Footnotes

1 We kindly thank Dott. Daniele Maras (Soprintendenza Archeologia, Belle Arti e Paesaggio per la Provincia di Viterbo e per l'Etruria meridionale) for his support, as well as the landowner Sig. Gianluca Mancini who graciously permitted access to the site. Fieldwork was supported by an Insight Grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (511934), Harvard University, and the British School at Rome.

References

Bellini, G.R., Hay, S., Launaro, A., Leone, N. and Millett, M. (2012) Interamna Lirenas. Papers of the British School at Rome 80: 358360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biella, M.C. (2020) Falerii Veteres - Falerii Novi: Il record archeologico. In Biella, M.C. (ed.), Displacements: continuità e discontinuità urbana nell'Italia centrale tirrenica. Rome: Quasar: 6781.Google Scholar
De Lucia Brolli, M.A. (1995) Falerii Novi: novità dall'area urbana e dalle necropoli. Atti della Pontificia Accademia Romana di Archeologia: Rendiconti 68: 2168.Google Scholar
Di Stefano Manzella, I. (1979) Falerii Novi negli scavi degli anni 1821–30 (Memorie della Pontifica Accademia Romana di Archeologia XII, 2). Rome, L'Erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Frederiksen, W.M. and Ward-Perkins, J.B. (1957) The ancient road system of the central and northern Ager Faliscus (notes on southern Etruria). Papers of the British School at Rome 25: 67203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, S., Johnson, P. Keay, S. and Millett, M. (2010) Falerii Novi: further survey of the northern extra-mural area. Papers of the British School at Rome 78: 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keay, S., Millett, M., Poppy, S., Robinson, J., Taylor, J. and Terrenato, N. (2000) Falerii Novi: a new survey of the walled area. Papers of the British School at Rome 68: 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millett, M. (2007) Urban topography and social identity in the Tiber Valley. In R. Roth and J. Keller (eds), Roman by Integration: Dimensions of group identity in material culture and text. Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement Series 66. Portsmouth RI. 7182.Google Scholar
Verdonck, L., Launaro, A., Vermeulen, F. and Millett, M. (2020) Ground-penetrating radar survey of Falerii Novi: a new approach to the study of Roman cities. Antiquity 94: 705–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Plan of Falerii Novi showing location of test pits and augers. Image by Elena Pomar.