Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T14:56:55.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Urnordisch: Eine Einführung. By Michael Schulte. (Wiener Studien zur Skandinavistik 26). Vienna: Praesens Verlag, 2018. Pp. 154. Paperback. €19.40

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2022

Marc Pierce*
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Austin
*
Department of Germanic Studies University of Texas at Austin 2505 University Avenue, C3300 Austin, TX 78712-1802 USA [mpierc@austin.utexas.edu]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Reviews
Copyright
© Society for Germanic Linguistics 2022

While a number of handbooks of the language of the Scandinavian runic inscriptions are available (for example, Krause & Jahnkuhn 1966, Krause Reference Krause1971, and Antonsen Reference Antonsen1975), an up-to-date work on the topic has long been a desideratum in light of the numerous developments in the field, such as the discovery of new runic inscriptions and the reinterpretation of older readings of some inscriptions. The volume reviewed here is just such a study, one which considers runic material and secondary literature that appeared up until 2017. Its author has a number of relevant publications (Schulte Reference Schulte1998, Reference Schulte2015, Reference Schulte2020, etc.) and over 20 years of engagement with the field under his belt, meaning that most readers will approach this book with high expectations. Fortunately, such expectations are met, as the volume is a concise, snappy, high-quality work.

The book contains seven thematic chapters, each of which addresses an aspect of Urnordisch (to avoid potential terminological issues, I use this term here). Chapter 1, Einführung (pp. 13–37), lays out the chronological and terminological aspects of Urnordisch (for example, Urnordisch versus Proto-Norse versus Ancient Nordic, etc.), the runic corpus, the position of Urnordisch within the Germanic language family, the comparative method, variation in Frühurnordisch, and some of the linguistic aspects of Urnordisch (some of which are North Germanic, others of which are Northwest Germanic). Chapter 2, Phonologie des Urnordischen (pp. 38–64), first describes the vowel (stressed and unstressed) and consonant systems of Urnordisch before turning to some of the most prominent phonological phenomena: umlaut, breaking, and syncope. In each of these sections, Schulte lays out the evidence carefully, reviews previous approaches to the problem, and then offers his own solution. For instance, in his discussion of i-umlaut, Schulte looks at the periodization model proposed by Axel Kock (Reference Kock1888, 1911–Reference Kock1916) and the criticisms of it in Hesselman Reference Hesselman1945, and eventually proposes an account linked to prosody (compare here the earlier discussion of this idea in Schulte Reference Schulte1998). Chapter 3, Morphologie des Urnordischen (pp. 65–81), addresses the morphological system, with sections on nouns, verbs, derivational morphology, and Sievers’ Law as a morphological phenomenon.

Next come three relatively short chapters. Chapter 4, Syntaktische Variation und diachrone Entwicklung (pp. 82–84), gives a very brief overview of Urnordisch syntax (brevity is to be expected, given the limitations of the available data in this regard). Chapter 5, Wortschatz des klassischen Urnordischen (pp. 85–90), presents some remarks on Urnordisch vocabulary (for instance, that there are a few loans from Celtic or Latin, and that some of the vocabulary does not appear in the modern Scandinavian languages). Chapter 6, Eine Auswahl älterer Runeninschriften (pp. 91–101), presents some of the runic inscriptions. In this chapter, Schulte provides a number of inscriptions, first giving information on the artifact, then the (transliterated) inscription, a translation, and some commentary. Schulte generally gives inscriptions that are not found in Krause & Jahnkuhn 1966. Fifteen such inscriptions are presented and discussed in the chapter. The volume closes with a useful chapter commenting on some of the relevant literature and databases (chapter 7, Weiterführende Literatur, pp. 102–106), followed by an extensive list of references and various appendices (a list of abbreviations, a glossary of technical terms, etc.).

My list of questions, suggestions, and corrections is very short. The main question has to do with the intended audience: Schulte includes terms such as Erste Lautverschiebung, Mora, and Passiv in the glossary, and explicitly distinguishes umlaut from ablaut (p. 51), which indicates that maybe the book is intended for beginners; yet it requires a high level of scholarly sophistication, meaning that it is not for beginners (Liberman Reference Liberman2019:593 makes the same point). Other minor comments include the following: Gemination is indeed found in North Germanic, albeit to a much more limited extent than in West Germanic, contra the statement on p. 37; the case for Sievers’ Law as an Indo-European phenomenon is messier than the flat description of it as “Dieses indogermanische Lautgesetz” [this Indo-European sound law] indicates (p. 78); and Koivulehto Reference Koivulehto, Brogyanyi and Krommelbein1986 is missing from the references (and a reference to Ruppel Reference Ruppel1999, a volume of Koivulehto’s collected papers, would also have been valuable, as Schulte cites several of Koivulehto’s studies, all of which are collected in that volume). An additional reference would occasionally be useful, for example, Markey & Mees 2014 on alu (p. 88).

In sum, Urnordisch provides an excellent introduction to the subject at quite a low price. The discussion is clear and precise, the data are presented and treated carefully, and Schulte never buries the reader in detail. The book will be of value to more advanced students and scholars of the subject, and I look forward to more publications by Schulte in this area.

References

REFERENCES

Antonsen, Elmer. 1975. A concise grammar of the older runic inscriptions. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesselman, Bengt. 1945. Omljud och brytning i de nordiska språken. Förstudier till en nordisk språkhistoria. Stockholm: H. Geber.Google Scholar
Kock, Axel. 1888. I-omljudet och den samnordiska förlusten af ändelsvokaler. Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi 4. 141–162.Google Scholar
Kock, Axel. 1911–1916. Umlaut und Brechung im Altschwedischen. Eine Übersicht. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Koivulehto, Jorma. 1986. Die Sieversche Regel im Lichte der germanisch-finnischen Lehnbeziehungen. Germanic dialects: Linguistic and philological investigations, ed. by Brogyanyi, Bela & Krommelbein, Thomas, 249294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, Wolfgang (mit Beiträgen von Herbert Jankuhn). 1966. Die Runeninschriften im älteren Futhark. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Krause, Wolfgang. 1971. Die Sprache der urnordischen Runeninschriften. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Liberman, Anatoly. 2019. Review of Michael Schulte, Urnordisch: Eine Einführung. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 118. 592–593.Google Scholar
Markey, Thomas L., & Bernard, Mees. 2014. Early Nordic alu and *al- ‘to nourish’. Journal of Indo-European Studies 42. 1–17.Google Scholar
Ruppel, Klaus. 1999. Verba mutuata. Quae vestigial antiquissimi cum Germanis aliisque Indo-Europaeis contactus in linguis Fennicis reliquerint. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.Google Scholar
Schulte, Michael. 1998. Grundfragen der Umlautphonemisierung. Eine strukturelle Analyse des nordgermanischen i/j Umlauts unter Berücksichtigung der älteren Runeninschriften. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte, Michael. 2015. Runology and historical sociolinguistics. On runic writing and its social history in the first millennium. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 1. 87–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte, Michael. 2020. On the history of the dotted runes and the connexion to the British Isles. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Deutschen Sprache und Literatur 142. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar