Hostname: page-component-69cd664f8f-nfhdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-12T11:08:48.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

RNA interference in parasitic helminths: current situation, potential pitfalls and future prospects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2007

P. GELDHOF*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Salisburylaan 133, B-9820 Merelbeke
A. VISSER
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Salisburylaan 133, B-9820 Merelbeke
D. CLARK
Affiliation:
Moredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park, Bush Loan, Penicuik, EH26 0PZ, UK
G. SAUNDERS
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Infection and Immunity, Bearsden Road, Glasgow, UK
C. BRITTON
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Infection and Immunity, Bearsden Road, Glasgow, UK
J. GILLEARD
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Infection and Immunity, Bearsden Road, Glasgow, UK
M. BERRIMAN
Affiliation:
Pathogen Sequencing Unit, Wellcome Trust Sanger InstituteWellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
D. KNOX
Affiliation:
Moredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park, Bush Loan, Penicuik, EH26 0PZ, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Salisburylaan 133, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium. E-mail: Peter.geldhof@Ugent.be
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

RNA interference (RNAi) has become an invaluable tool for the functional analysis of genes in a wide variety of organisms including the free-living nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Recently, attempts have been made to apply this technology to parasitic helminths of animals and plants with variable success. Gene knockdown has been reported for Schistosoma mansoni by soaking or electroporating different life-stages in dsRNA. Similar approaches have been tested on parasitic nematodes which clearly showed that, under certain conditions, it was possible to interfere with gene expression. However, despite these successes, the current utility of this technology in parasite research is questionable. First, problems have arisen with the specificity of RNAi. Treatment of the parasites with dsRNA resulted, in many cases, in non-specific effects. Second, the current RNAi methods have a limited efficiency and effects are sometimes difficult to reproduce. This was especially the case in strongylid parasites where only a small number of genes were susceptible to RNAi-mediated gene knockdown. The future application of RNAi in parasite functional genomics will greatly depend on how we can overcome these difficulties. Optimization of the dsRNA delivery methods and in vitro culture conditions will be the major challenges.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

INTRODUCTION

RNA interference (RNAi) is a technology to downregulate the expression of a gene by the addition of gene-specific double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). It was originally characterized in Caenorhabditis elegans (Fire et al. Reference Fire, Xu, Montgomery, Kostas, Driver and Mello1998) and has since then been applied in a wide variety of organisms to study gene function, including protozoa (Ullu et al. Reference Ullu, Tshudi and Chakraborty2004), amphibians (Oelgeschlager et al. Reference Oelgeschlager, Larrain, Geissert and De Robertis2000), insects (Kennerdell and Carthrew, Reference Kennerdell and Carthew1998) and mammals (Hannon, Reference Hannon2002). The molecular processes and components necessary for a functional RNAi pathway have been extensively investigated in C. elegans and were summarized by Grishok (Reference Grishok2005). A simplified model of the RNAi mechanism is shown in Fig. 1. In short, the dsRNA is recognized by a protein complex containing a double-stranded RNA binding protein (Rde-4), the dsRNA-specific ribonuclease, dicer, which cleaves the dsRNA into small inhibitory RNAs (siRNAs), a DexH box helicase drh-1 and a Rde-1 protein which is thought to transport the siRNAs to the RNA induced silencing complex (RISC) complex. This interaction results in the activation of the RISC complex which targets homologous mRNA transcripts by a base-pairing mechanism. Once bound, the target transcript is degraded by the RISC complex, resulting in a gene knock-down. In C. elegans the silencing effect is systemic, spreading to most cells through the activity of the SID and RSD proteins. siRNAs are subsequently recognized by the RISC protein complex. Thus, RNAi is induced by dsRNA, the RNAi effect can be systemic and, at least in C. elegans, is heritable (Grishok, Reference Grishok2005). In C. elegans, this RNAi mechanism can be triggered by injection of dsRNA into the adult worm body, by soaking any life-cycle in dsRNA or by feeding worms on bacteria expressing dsRNA. For a more detailed description of the RNAi pathway and all the different components we refer the reader to the excellent review by Grishok (Reference Grishok2005).

Fig. 1. Simplified schematic model of the RNAi mechanism in Caenorhabditis elegans. Double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) is processed into small inhibitory RNAs (siRNAs) by dicer. Processed dsRNA is thought to be transported systemically in the worm by the SID and RSD proteins and siRNAs are subsequently bound by the RISC complex. The activated RISC complex will subsequently bind and degrade the homologous mRNA.

The ease with which RNAi can be carried out on C. elegans has revolutionized functional genomic studies in this organism in recent years. Large-scale screens have been performed on virtually every predicted C. elegans gene. The outcome of these studies are increasingly being used in parasite research as well, since it could help in identifying novel drug and vaccine targets (reviewed by Britton and Murray, Reference Britton and Murray2006). However, a large number of parasite genes do not have apparent homologues in C. elegans. These genes are probably involved in the parasitic life-style and host-parasite interactions, i.e. the genes that are likely to be the most interesting biologically and important targets for control interventions. It is therefore clear that RNAi applied directly on the parasites would be an extremely useful tool. As currently happens in the C. elegans research community, the technology would be used by virtually every molecular parasitology research group to study the function of their genes of interest. The relatively small number of papers describing successful RNAi in parasitic helminths is therefore somewhat surprising considering that RNAi was first reported in parasitic nematodes in 2002 (Hussein et al. Reference Hussein, Kichenin and Selkirk2002) and trematodes in 2003 (Skelly et al. Reference Skelly, Da'dara and Harn2003; overview in Table 1). This could be a sign that the use of RNAi on helminths is not as straightforward as might have been expected. In this review we will focus on the current status of RNAi in parasitic helminths, discuss the problems that have been encountered and consider potential future prospects for this technology.

Table 1. Summary of RNAi studies in helminths

RNAi IN TREMATODES

The first report of successful RNAi in trematodes was published by Skelly et al. (Reference Skelly, Da'dara and Harn2003). A cathepsin B was targeted in cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni. Cercariae were soaked in dsRNA for 6 days and the expression of cathepsin B assayed by reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), immunostaining and enzyme activity assays. The outcome of the 3 different methods clearly showed that, compared to the controls, the cathepsin B dsRNA-treated cercariae had lower levels of cathepsin B expression. Shortly after this report, Boyle et al. (Reference Boyle, Wu, Shoemaker and Yoshino2003) published the successful down-regulation of a facilitated diffusion glucose transporter (SGTP1) and a glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) in S. mansoni sporocysts. Miracidia were allowed to undergo the transition to sporocysts in the presence of dsRNA and were then incubated for 6 days. Targeted transcript levels were reduced by 70–80% as determined by quantitative RT-PCR and in the case of SGTP1, the larval glucose-uptake capacity was reduced by 40%. An identical approach was recently used by Dinguirard and Yoshino (Reference Dinguirard and Yoshino2006), who targeted a CD36-like class B scavenger receptor (SRB) in S. mansoni. The SRB protein is a multi-ligand-binding protein which is thought to be important for the binding of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) to the surface of schistosomula and adult S. mansoni. Miracidia were soaked in gene specific dsRNA and, after 6 days, the treatment resulted in a significant knockdown (60–70%) of SRB transcript levels in sporocysts. Eight and 10 days post-dsRNA incubation, the sporocysts showed a significant reduction in acetylated LDL binding.

An alternative method to introduce dsRNA in schistosomes is electroporation. The method was originally described by Correnti and Pearce (Reference Correnti and Pearce2004) as an approach for transgene expression in S. mansoni schistosomula. A 20 ms pulse at 125 V using a square-wave electroporation generator was optimal to electroporate the parasites with a luciferase-encoding RNA, used to test for efficient introduction of nucleic acid. The majority of the schistosomes expressed the introduced RNA and acute mortality was negligible. The same approach was subsequently used to introduce cathepsin B (SmCB1)-specific dsRNA in schistosomula (Correnti et al. Reference Correnti, Brindley and Pearce2005). This resulted in a greater than 10-fold reduction in SmCB1 transcript levels that persisted for >20 days. The treated schistosomes also showed a reduced SmCB1 enzyme activity and significant growth retardation when compared to control parasites. The effect on growth was apparent when parasites were maintained both in culture or introduced into mammalian hosts.

At the time of writing this review, no reports have been published on the use of RNAi in other trematode species.

RNAi IN PARASITIC NEMATODES OF ANIMALS

RNAi has been tested extensively in a variety of parasitic nematodes from different phylogenetic clades. Nippostrongylus brasiliensis was the first parasitic nematode on which RNAi was successfully performed (Hussein et al. Reference Hussein, Kichenin and Selkirk2002). Soaking adult worms in dsRNA for the acetylcholinesterase (AChE) A isoform resulted in a 80–90% reduction of the secretion of 3 AChE isoforms (A, B and C) throughout a 6-day culture period, as measured by an enzyme activity assay. A smaller dsRNA construct (240 bp) proved to be more potent than dsRNA targeting the full length mRNA (1·8 kb) although the transcript levels were not monitored in this study. Despite this significant suppression, no obvious effects on worm morphology or behaviour were observed.

RNA interference effects have also been reported in filarial nematodes. Aboobaker and Blaxter (Reference Aboobaker and Blaxter2003) described an optimized microvolume culture system to soak the human parasite Brugia malayi in dsRNA. They demonstrated that fluorescently labelled dsRNA molecules of 300 bp were able to enter the adult females. The system was subsequently used to target beta-tubulin, RNA polymerase II large subunit and a microfilarial sheath protein. RT-PCRs indicated that all target transcript levels started to drop between 14 and 17 h of soaking. After 24 h, worms soaked in dsRNA for beta-tubulin and the RNA polymerase II large subunit were dead. Targeting the microfilarial sheath protein was not lethal to adult females in culture, an observation which suggests that the lethality phenotype noted above was not due to non-specific toxic effects of the dsRNA soaking, but RNAi induced a marked reduction in microfilariae release and 50% of the released microfilariae did not have fully elongated sheaths.

RNA interference was also used on the L3 life-stage of the human filarial nematode Onchocerca volvulus (Lustigman et al. Reference Lustigman, Zhang, Liu, Oksov and Hashmi2004; Ford et al. Reference Ford, Guiliano, Oksov, Debnath, Liu, Williams, Blaxter and Lustigman2005). Filarial serine protease inhibitors, a cathepsin L- and a cathepsin Z-like cysteine protease were targeted by soaking the L3 larvae in dsRNA for 18–20 h. Targeting the serine protease inhibitors resulted in the specific knock-down of the target transcript levels and a loss of native proteins. Seven days post-dsRNA incubation, the larvae showed a significant reduction in both moulting and viability (Ford et al. Reference Ford, Guiliano, Oksov, Debnath, Liu, Williams, Blaxter and Lustigman2005). Similar phenotypic effects were obtained for the cathepsin L- and cathepsin Z-like cysteine proteases (Lustigman et al. Reference Lustigman, Zhang, Liu, Oksov and Hashmi2004). However, specific transcript levels for the latter were not examined.

RNA interference in filarial parasites was further optimized by Pfarr et al. (Reference Pfarr, Heider and Hoerauf2006). In this report, the actin gene from the rodent parasite Litosomoides sigmodontis was targeted by soaking adult worms in different concentrations of dsRNA, ranging from 0·035 to 35 μm. Actin transcription was suppressed by all tested concentrations. However, 3·5 μm dsRNA, which is a 10-fold lower concentration than that used on adult B. malayi worms (Aboobaker and Blaxter, Reference Aboobaker and Blaxter2003), consistently reduced the actin transcript levels to <10% of the controls. This effect persisted for at least 72 h. Treated worms showed paralysis between 48 and 72 h after the start of the experiment and also released significantly less microfilariae. In Ascaris suum, RNA interference was used to study the function of an inorganic pyrophosphatase (Islam et al. Reference Islam, Miyoshi, Yamada and Tsuji2005). Lung-stage larvae were incubated in dsRNA (2 mg/ml final concentration) for 24 h after which they were transferred to dsRNA-free medium and incubated for up to 10 days. Target mRNA and protein levels were significantly suppressed 5 days after the dsRNA treatment, as measured by RT-PCR, enzyme assay, immunofluorescence and immunoblot (Islam et al. Reference Islam, Miyoshi, Yamada and Tsuji2005). After 10 days, the treated larvae showed a reduced moulting from L3 to L4 by 31% compared to control larvae. However, control larvae were not cultured in the presence of nonsense dsRNA to eliminate the possibility of non-specific treatment effects.

Recently, several RNAi studies have been published in trichostrongyloid nematodes of veterinary importance. Issa et al. (Reference Issa, Grant, Stasiuk and Shoemaker2005) investigated the efficiency of 3 different RNAi techniques, namely soaking, electroporation and feeding on bacteria producing dsRNA, in the L1 life-stage of the sheep parasitic nematode Trichostrongylus colubriformis. Ubiquitin was used as a target since it is well conserved within the nematodes and it induces a strong phenotype when knocked down in C. elegans. Electroporation in ubiquitin dsRNA was the only method which significantly inhibited the development of the L1 larvae compared to control larvae electroporated in buffer only. However, transcript knockdown was not assessed by semi- or quantitative RT-PCR. No effects were observed after feeding or soaking. As an alternative to the dsRNA produced by in vitro transcription, they also tested the effect of 22 bp synthetic dsRNA (siRNA) derived from ubiquitin coding sequence. Both soaking and electroporation of T. colubriformis L1 larvae in this siRNA resulted in significant reductions in the number of L3 stage larvae observed in cultures 6 days later. It is also interesting to note that although the feeding method was unsuccessful for ubiquitin, it did cause a strong phenotype when tested with tropomyosin as a target gene.

Successful RNAi in the blood-feeding nematode Haemonchus contortus was first described by Kotze and Bagnall (Reference Kotze and Bagnall2005). Two beta-tubulin genes were targeted in exsheathed L3, L4 and adult parasites by culturing the worms in medium containing dsRNA. Quantitative PCRs indicated that the transcript levels of both genes dropped significantly in all 3 parasitic life-stages (greater than 1000-fold in some cases) after 24 h of incubation. After 6 days of treatment, L3 worms showed a decreased motility compared to control worms and less worms developed to the L4 stage. Although the adult worms showed marked gene suppression, they did not show any reduced motility compared to controls. Since gene suppression effects occurred in L3 larvae which do not have a functional oral orifice, the authors suggested that the uptake of dsRNA in H. contortus might not depend on ingestion. This hypothesis was also supported by the finding that adult worms which were treated with ivermectin to paralyse their pharynx were still susceptible to gene suppression by RNAi.

We have recently carried out an extensive study to further investigate the efficiency of RNAi in H. contortus (Geldhof et al. Reference Geldhof, Murray, Couthier, Gilleard, McLauchlan, Knox and Britton2006). Eleven different genes, including a beta-tubulin gene tested by Kotze and Bagnal (Reference Kotze and Bagnall2005), were targeted in exsheathed L3 larvae by soaking in dsRNA. The effect of the treatment was analysed by RT-PCR and, where possible, protein assays. In agreement with the results of Kotze and Bagnal (Reference Kotze and Bagnall2005), we also observed a specific decrease in transcript levels of the beta-tubulin gene after 24 h of soaking. Similar results were obtained for sec-23, a gene involved in vesicle transport. However, no signs of specific decreases in expression levels were observed for the other 9 genes tested. As soaking did not result in robust RNAi knockdown, we examined electroporation of L1 larvae as a way of introducing dsRNA. Four different genes were targeted: beta-tubulin, superoxide dismutase, cathepsin L and an ATPase. Clear decreases in transcript levels were only found for beta-tubulin and superoxide dismutase 24 h after electroporation at 50 and 100 V. In addition, we observed a high level of larval death following electroporation even in the presence of control dsRNA, indicating that using current protocols this method could not be used for functional analysis.

Similar results were recently published by Visser et al. (Reference Visser, Geldhof, De Maere, Knox, Vercruysse and Claerebout2006) for the cattle parasite Ostertagia ostertagi. Eight different genes were targeted in L1 and L3 larvae by electroporation and soaking in dsRNA. In L3 larvae, variable decreases in target transcript levels were observed for 5 genes (tropomyosin, beta-tubulin, ATPase, superoxide dismutase and a polyprotein allergen). RNA interference for a transthyretin-like protein, a 17 kDa ES protein and ubiquitin never resulted in a decrease of transcript levels. Electroporation of L1 larvae was less effective compared to soaking. Reductions in target transcript levels were only observed for 2 genes and were difficult to reproduce. The authors also investigated the specificity of observed RNAi effects. This was done by checking changes in transcription levels of a large set of non-target genes in worms treated with tropomyosin dsRNA. No differences were observed between control and treated larvae, suggesting that the observed reductions are specific for the target gene.

RNAi IN PLANT-PARASITIC NEMATODES

RNAi has also been demonstrated in plant-parasitic nematodes that cost world agriculture in the region of $125 billion annually (Chitwood, Reference Chitwood2003). Like parasitic nematodes of animals, the infective stages are very small making microinjection with dsRNA a major challenge (Bakhetia et al. Reference Bakhetia, Charlton, Urwin, McPherson and Atkinson2005a). Moreover, an additional problem is that they do not ingest fluid until they infect the host plant. Oral ingestion can be stimulated by octopamine (Urwin et al. Reference Urwin, Lilley and Atkinson2002) and this approach has been used with success in pre-parasitic second-stage juveniles of Heterodera glycines, Globodera pallida (Urwin et al. Reference Urwin, Lilley and Atkinson2002) and Meloidogyne spp. (Bakhetia et al. Reference Bakhetia, Charlton, Atkinson and McPherson2005b; Fanelli et al. Reference Fanelli, Di Vito, Jones and De Giorgi2005). Moreover, the inclusion of 1% resorcinol in the incubation solution can induce dsRNA uptake through the alimentary tract (Rosso et al. Reference Rosso, Dubrana, Cimbolini, Jaubert and Abad2005). This reagent acts as a neurostimulant and increases stylet thrusting and accumulation of secretions in Meloidogyne incognita (Jaubert et al. Reference Jaubert, Ledger, Laffaire, Abad and Rosso2002).

RNAi targeting cysteine proteinases and a C-type lectin homologue in the cyst nematode Heterodera glycines resulted in reduced transcript abundance and phenotypic effects (Urwin et al. Reference Urwin, Lilley and Atkinson2002). In the case of the cysteine proteinases, RNAi had no effect on establishment on the plant but did alter the male:female ratio in favour of males 14 days post-infection. With the C-type lectin homologues, sexual fate was unaltered but the number of worms on infected plants was reduced by 41% (Urwin et al. Reference Urwin, Lilley and Atkinson2002). Also in H. glycines, RNAi-induced suppression, conducted on J2 juveniles, of an aminopeptidase associated with the reproductive tract of adult females and the genital primordium of pre-parasitic juveniles resulted in a 61% reduction in the number of female nematodes parasitizing soybean roots 21 days after infection with infective juveniles (Lilley et al. Reference Lilley, Goodchild, Atkinson and Urwin2005). Targeting the major sperm protein (MSP) had no effect on development but transcript abundance was reduced when males reached sexual maturity and sperm are produced (Urwin et al. Reference Urwin, Lilley and Atkinson2002). Moreover, Chen et al. (Reference Chen, Rehman, Smant and Jones2005) used RNAi to define the function of putative pathogenicity proteins in Globodera rostochiensis showing that knock-down of a beta-1,4, endoglucanase reduced the ability of the nematodes to invade the roots while gr-ams-1, a protein secreted from the amphids, is essential for host location.

Bakhetia et al. (Reference Bakhetia, Charlton, Atkinson and McPherson2005b) reported a reduction in the number and size of established females as well as a 70% reduction in egg output compared to controls when a dual oxidase expressed in M. incognita was targeted by RNAi. Further, chitin synthetase, expressed in egg-shells of the root-knot nematode M. artellia, was reduced after soaking developing eggs in dsRNA (Fanelli et al. Reference Fanelli, Di Vito, Jones and De Giorgi2005). In addition, RNAi of a cathepsin L-like cysteine proteinase expressed in the intestine of young and mature female M. incognita reduced transcript abundance, enzyme activity, reduced the number of nematodes infecting plants as well as the number of established females producing eggs (Shingles et al. Reference Shingles, Lilley, Atkinson and Urwin2006).

Bioengineering crop plants which express dsRNA targeting genes essential for parasitism is now being developed. Yadav et al. (Reference Yadav, Veluthambi and Subramaniam2006) cloned 2 genes from M. incognita into a plant expression vector that expresses both sense and anti-sense strands in a way that the resultant transcript forms hair-pin dsRNA. When introduced into tobacco plants, root-knot formation was dramatically reduced compared to controls. The authors suggested that the RNAi response was amplified by the host plant RNAi machinery generating siRNAs which may more readily pass through the feeding tube. Using a similar approach, Huang et al. (Reference Huang, Allen, Davis, Baum and Hussey2006) demonstrated that the introduction of a dsRNA construct into Arabidopsis, which encoded a conserved root-knot nematode secretory peptide required for parasitism, resulted in effective resistance to infection with 4 major root-knot nematode species.

POTENTIAL PITFALLS

Based on the successful RNAi experiments, some papers have concluded that the current RNAi methods in helminths are useful tools to analyse gene function and could be developed for high throughput analysis to screen for potential drug and vaccine targets. However, we believe that this is an over-optimistic view. It is clear that RNAi is effective in some helminths against some genes but it is becoming apparent that the inconsistencies associated with the technique preclude its use as a reliable screen for potential drug and vaccine targets at the present time. Many questions remain unanswered and, when analysed in more detail, the current RNAi methods show severe problems and inconsistencies when applied to parasitic nematodes in particular.

An essential step in claiming successful RNAi is the evaluation of the experiment. So far, there has been no consistency in the methods used to do this. The first effect of RNAi is the specific decrease of target transcript levels. Surprisingly, some studies have not investigated this and have only provided indirect evidence for RNAi. In T. colubriformis, RNAi for ubiquitin was regarded as successful since L1 larvae failed to develop through to the L3 stage (Issa et al. Reference Issa, Grant, Stasiuk and Shoemaker2005). This conclusion is based on the assumption that the function of ubiquitin is conserved between T. colubriformis and C. elegans. Although it is probably valid to make this assumption for highly conserved genes such as ubiquitin, care is still needed when extrapolating results from C. elegans to parasitic nematodes and RT-PCR analysis is needed to confirm specific gene silencing effects. A second evaluation tool is immunolocalization, used in the RNAi experiments targeting cathepsin L and Z-like cysteine proteases in O. volvulus (Lustigman et al. Reference Lustigman, Zhang, Liu, Oksov and Hashmi2004). This indicated a reduced presence of both proteins in various regions of the moulting larvae. Unfortunately, this type of analysis makes it very difficult to quantify the effect and more importantly, it is unclear in how many worms this effect was visible. Analysis of the transcript levels in both cases would strengthen the claim of successful RNAi.

When RNAi is used to analyse gene function, it is of vital importance that it specifically targets the chosen gene and causes no other effects in the parasites. However, some of the current RNAi methods clearly induce off-target effects. This is especially the case for the soaking method. In S. mansoni, Skelly et al. (Reference Skelly, Da'dara and Harn2003) reported a change in cathepsin B expression and distribution in cercariae incubated in control dsRNA. They also observed a substantial decrease in cathepsin activity in different control groups treated with dsRNA in the presence of lipofectamine, which was added to the culture medium to improve the uptake of the dsRNA. It clearly suggests that lipofectamine may have a general detrimental impact on this parasite (Skelly et al. Reference Skelly, Da'dara and Harn2003). The data published by Dinguirard and Yoshina (Reference Dinguirard and Yoshino2006) indicated a 25% reduction in mRNA levels of a non-target control gene by culturing miracidia in dsRNA. After 10 days in culture, sporocysts treated with control dsRNA also showed a significant decrease in length. Off target effects were also observed in filarial nematodes. Treatment of L3 O. volvulus larvae with control dsRNA resulted in a 24·7–49·8% reduction in moulting (Lustigman et al. Reference Lustigman, Zhang, Liu, Oksov and Hashmi2004; Ford et al. Reference Ford, Guiliano, Oksov, Debnath, Liu, Williams, Blaxter and Lustigman2005) and adult B. malayi parasites soaked in control dsRNA showed a reduced motility (Aboobaker and Blaxter, Reference Aboobaker and Blaxter2003). Pfarr et al. (Reference Pfarr, Heider and Hoerauf2006) recently showed that high concentrations of dsRNA were also stressful to the adult stage of the filarial parasite L. sigmodontis, as measured by an upregulated expression of a heat shock protein. Finally, some non-target effects were also evident in H. contortus L3 larvae after 72 h incubation in dsRNA targeting a beta-tubulin gene (Kotze and Bagnall, Reference Kotze and Bagnall2005). In addition, Bakhetia et al. (Reference Bakhetia, Charlton, Urwin, McPherson and Atkinson2005a) also noted that mis-targeting can also arise for genes that have full sequence similarity for just 21 bp. The potential danger is that these non-target effects are mistakenly regarded as specific phenotypes resulting from a gene knock-out or, alternatively, that they mask the specific phenotype. The observation that dsRNA itself can have an effect on the parasites also emphasizes the importance of appropriate controls.

As well as being specific, a potential RNAi screening method should also be efficient and reliable. In our study on H. contortus we showed that although it was possible to suppress gene expression by soaking in dsRNA, it only worked on a limited number of genes (2 out of 11 tested) and in some cases the effect was difficult to reproduce. Similar results were recently published by Visser et al. (Reference Visser, Geldhof, De Maere, Knox, Vercruysse and Claerebout2006) in O. ostertagi. Their data indicated that the problem with reproducibility was caused, in part, by differences between dsRNA preparations. For unknown reasons, some samples induced complete silencing whereas others had only a minor effect. An adequate number of replicates is required to confirm any effects. For example, our initial experiments focussed on superoxide dismutase (SOD) expression in L3 H. contortus. This gene was selected because enzyme activity was readily measured, antibody probes were available to us to conduct immunoassays of protein expression and SOD is constitutively expressed throughout the life-cycle. After 5 separate RNAi experiments, where exsheathed L3 were incubated with SOD dsRNA and lipofectin, specific enzyme activity in L3 extracts was reduced by 30% compared to controls although no effect on transcript abundance could be demonstrated. We repeated the experiment on a further 5 occasions and, statistically, the effect on enzyme activity was lost.

It is also unclear why some of the genes tested are more susceptible to RNAi than others. Differences in location, stability and/or levels of target transcript in the parasite could be important. With the exception of some neuronal genes, most C. elegans genes are susceptible to RNAi. The significant variation in sensitivity we have observed is therefore unusual and may be a reflection of the inefficiency of the technique in strongylid parasites. However, only a limited number of genes have been tested in the other parasite species. A similar pattern might appear as more genes are tested. Alternatively, more genes may have been tested, but only the ones on which RNAi was successful were reported. For example, Issa et al. (Reference Issa, Grant, Stasiuk and Shoemaker2005) quantified L3 development in T. colubriformis larvae that were fed HT115 expressing dsRNA from a number of T. colubriformis genes available in their laboratory and they reported that one gene, tropomyosin Tc tmy-1, did induce a strong RNAi phenotype when fed to L1 larvae under the same conditions as previously used unsuccessfully with Tc ubq-1. This statement infers that the RNAi protocols used had variable efficacy depending on the genes targeted. In evaluating the reliability and specificity of the technique, it would be helpful to report the percentage success rate in terms of total number of genes targeted and success should be confirmed by demonstrating reduction in the target RNA transcript in treated worms compared to control worms exposed to nonsense dsRNA and worms not exposed to dsRNA but cultured for the same period of time.

FUTURE PROSPECTS

The first and crucial step in RNAi is the delivery of dsRNA to the parasite. In order to use RNAi for large-scale screening, the delivery method should preferably be simple, quick, cheap and reliable. Despite some successes, all of the methods tested on helminths (soaking, feeding and electroporation) have shown severe limitations. Non-specific effects, variabilty of the outcome and a low efficiency are the major obstacles. The ideal treatment should combine a maximum uptake of dsRNA with a minimum of side-effects. Unfortunately, manipulating parasites under in vitro conditions without inducing non-specific effects is extremely difficult. Uptake may also differ in the different stages of the same parasite. Fluorescently-labelled dsRNA was detected in the pharynx and gut of L2 and L4 but not L3 H. contortus (Geldhof et al. Reference Geldhof, Murray, Couthier, Gilleard, McLauchlan, Knox and Britton2006), suggesting this may not be the best stage to target by RNAi using current protocols.

A possible alternative to improve uptake is the use of small interfering RNAs (siRNA). Issa et al. (Reference Issa, Grant, Stasiuk and Shoemaker2005) reported that these molecules were more effective in T. colubriformis than dsRNA. In addition, the use of siRNAs, which are commercially available, would also circumvent the problem with dsRNA batch differences. Unfortunately, producing the siRNAs is still very expensive. This approach is, therefore, more suitable to analyse selected target genes rather than for large-scale screening. It is also important to note that off target effects can be induced by siRNAs (e.g. Scacheri et al. Reference Scacheri, Rozenblatt-Rosen, Caplen, Wolfsberg, Umayam, Lee, Hughes, Shanmugam, Bhattacharjee, Meyerson and Collins2004) and by precursor microRNAs (e.g. Bartel, Reference Bartel2004), the latter resulting in cleavage of the target RNA if complementarity is almost perfect or can trigger translational repression following imperfect annealing in the 3'UTR.

Transgenic technology expressing dsRNA from hairpin constructs within cells has been shown to result in inducible and heritable gene silencing in C. elegans (Tavernarakis et al. Reference Tavernarakis, Wang, Dorovkov, Ryazanov and Driscoll2000). This delivery approach could potentially be used in parasitic nematodes if successful transformation can be achieved.

Based on the published data, RNAi in schistosomes seems to be more robust and reproducible compared to the parasitic nematodes. It is important to note that the consistent RNAi effects in S. mansoni only became apparent after 6 days of in vitro culture (Correnti et al. Reference Correnti, Brindley and Pearce2005). This was the case for both the soaking and electroporation method with miracidia, cercariae and schistosomula. Analyses of parasites at earlier time-points revealed inconsistent effects (Correnti et al. Reference Correnti, Brindley and Pearce2005). The appearance of the RNAi effects in both miracidia and cercariae coincided with the onset of growth and development (Boyle et al. Reference Boyle, Wu, Shoemaker and Yoshino2003; Correnti et al. Reference Correnti, Brindley and Pearce2005). Therefore, the ability of the parasite to grow and develop under in vitro culture conditions could be an important factor in the susceptibility to RNAi. Culturing parasitic nematodes is, unfortunately, more problematic compared to the situation with schistosomes. It has proved to be very difficult to maintain parasitic nematodes in vitro for longer periods. For example, Britton and Murray (Reference Britton and Murray2006) reported that the early larval stages of H. contortus can be maintained in a healthy condition for only around 5 days and development to healthy L4 and adult stages cannot be achieved with the current standard culture systems. The development of new and improved culture methods that enable development of the nematode through successive stages would be a huge step forward. It could potentially improve the efficiency of RNAi and it would also enable us to analyse longer term effects of a gene knock-down. Unfortunately, this is easier said than done. Parasitic nematodes have a complex life-cycle with their own specific hosts and niches. Simulating this under in vitro conditions will be extremely difficult. Even if we would succeed, it is still questionable how these worms would compare to worms that are resident in their natural hosts. It is possible that they will transcribe a different panel of genes. Therefore, in vivo studies of RNAi effects may still be needed.

The studies on H. contortus and O. ostertagi have indicated that most of the genes targeted could not be knocked down by RNAi (Geldhof et al. Reference Geldhof, Murray, Couthier, Gilleard, McLauchlan, Knox and Britton2006; Visser et al. in press), putative homologues of which are particularly amenable to RNAi in the larval life-stages of C. elegans. Although this might be caused by problems with the dsRNA delivery or the in vitro culture conditions, it is also possible that there are fundamental differences between the RNAi pathways of these nematodes. There are multiple examples of closely related species which differ in their susceptibility to RNAi, even within the Caenorhabditis clade (Descotte and Montgomery, personal communication). Whereas RNAi in C. elegans works by soaking, feeding and injection, it only works in C. briggsae by injection. This suggests that C. briggsae has the basic RNAi machinery, but lacks the machinery necessary for dsRNA uptake and transport.

A potential way to analyse the RNAi pathway in parasites is by genome database mining. Whole genome shotgun sequencing of B. malayi has recently been completed (Ghedin et al. Reference Ghedin, Wang, Foster and Slatko2004) and the H. contortus genome is currently being sequenced by the Pathogen Sequencing Unit of the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute (Cambridge, UK). The genome has been sequenced to approximately 6-fold coverage (based on an estimated haploid genome size of 60 Mb), by whole genome shotgun sequencing, which should equate to well over 98% of the genome sequence, using the Lander-Waterman equation (Lander and Waterman, Reference Lander and Waterman1988). In a preliminary analysis we have screened this H. contortus genome database for 17 genes that have a known function in the RNAi pathway in C. elegans (Grishok, Reference Grishok2005). The results of this analysis are shown in Table 2. In short, the 17 C. elegans protein sequences were taken from Wormbase (www.wormbase.org) and used to carry out tBLASTn searches against the H. contortus genome database using the online Sanger Institute BLAST server (www.sanger.ac.uk/cgi-bin/blast/submitblast/h_contortus). The H. contortus sequences identified in each BLAST analysis were used in the ContigExpress programme of Vector NTI to identify overlapping reads (>98% identity over >50 bp). The individual and/or consensus sequences were subsequently used to calculate the percentage identity/similarity to its putative C. elegans homologue and percentage of the C. elegans protein covered (Table 2). This analysis identified putative homologues of RNAi genes in the H. contortus genome, namely dcr-1, drh-1, rde-1, rde-3, sid-1, eri-1, rrf-1, tsn-1, vig-1, rrf-1, ego-1, mut-7 and rsd-6. However, other genes which are thought to be essential for a functional and systemic RNAi pathway have not yet been found; these include rde-2, rde-4, sid-2 and rsd-2.

Table 2. Analysis of the Haemonchus contortus genome (currently 6-fold coverage) for genes essential in the RNAi pathway

(The preliminary H. contortus genome database was searched with 17 C. elegans protein sequences by tBLASTn. Putative homologous sequences were analysed for overlapping reads and subsequently used to calculate the percentage identity, similarity and coverage to its Caenorhabditis elegans homologue.)

The absence so far of the rde-4 gene is intriguing. The RDE-4 protein binds double-stranded RNA and is critical for complex formation with dicer and generation of short interfering RNAs (Parrish and Fire, Reference Parrish and Fire2001). Hence, it is critical for an active RNAi pathway in C. elegans. RNAi is inoperative in C. elegans mutants lacking rde-4 (Tabara et al. Reference Tabara, Sarkissian, Kelly, Fleenor, Grishok, Timmons, Fire and Mello1999) and we have shown that rde-4 is required for silencing C. elegans homologues of genes of interest to us in H. contortus (Clark, Geldhof and Knox, unpublished observations). Rde-4 is also not obviously apparent in the Brugia malayi genome, nor is a homologue apparent in the S. mansoni gene datasets. Given that successful RNAi has been described in both the latter, are other mechanisms for RNAi operative in helminths?

If rde-2, sid-2 and rsd-2 are indeed absent from the H. contortus genome, it would infer that an RNAi effect would not spread through the worm and to the germline. If this is the case, effects would only be observed in regions of the worm directly accessible to the dsRNA such as the outer surface, the gut and the reproductive tract. This could explain the variation observed in susceptibility of different genes to RNAi. However, if rde-4 is not present, how can the dsRNA be processed? Of course, despite the 6-fold coverage, the H. contortus genome sequence is not complete and it is still possible that homologues for these genes have yet to be sequenced. However, if their absence holds up, it could mean that RNAi might be impossible in H. contortus or, that an alternative pathway is operating. Further analysis of the genome information, combined with gene expression studies, will be extremely valuable in the study of RNAi in parasites.

CONCLUSIONS

It has been clearly established that, under certain conditions, it is possible to interfere with gene expression in helminths by RNAi. However, problems have arisen with the efficiency, specificity and reproducibility of the current techniques. Unless we can further improve the different methods, the application of RNAi for functional analysis will be restricted, the major difficulty being the interpretation of a negative experiment. Is the target gene non-essential to the parasite or is it inaccessible to the RNAi treatment? In order to render the technique more robust, we should use the current knowledge on RNAi and combine it with future research on delivery methods, culturing systems and helminth genomics.

The sequence data were produced by the Pathogen Sequencing Unit at the Sanger Institute and can be obtained from ftp://ftp.sanger.ac.uk/pub/pathogens/Haemonchus/contortus/genome/. M. B. is supported by the Wellcome Trust through their funding of the Pathogen Sequencing Unit at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute.We also thank Robin Beech for help in genome sequence analysis. P. G. is the recipient of a Marie Curie reintegration grant (no 028870) and A. V. is funded by the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (Belgium) (Aspirant – F. W. O. Vlaanderen).

References

REFERENCES

Aboobaker, A. A. and Blaxter, M. L. (2003). Use of RNA interference to investigate gene function in the human filarial nematode parasite Brugia malayi. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 129, 4151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakhetia, M., Charlton, W. L., Urwin, P. E., McPherson, M. J. and Atkinson, H. J. (2005 a). RNA interference and plant parasitic nematodes. Trends in Plant Science 10, 362367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakhetia, M., Charlton, W., Atkinson, H. J. and McPherson, M. J. (2005 b). RNA interference of dual oxidase in the plant nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 18, 10991106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartel, D. P. (2004). MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 116, 281297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyle, J. P., Wu, X. J., Shoemaker, C. B. and Yoshino, T. P. (2003). Using RNA interference to manipulate endogenous gene expression in Schistosoma mansoni sporocysts. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 128, 205215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Britton, C. and Murray, L. (2006). Using Caenorhabditis elegans for functional analysis of genes of parasitic nematodes. International Journal for Parasitology 36, 651659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Q., Rehman, S., Smant, G. and Jones, J. T. (2005). Functional analysis of pathogenicity proteins of the potato cyst nematode Globodera rostochiensis using RNAi. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 18, 621625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chitwood, D. J. (2003). Research on plant-parasitic nematode biology conducted by the United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service. Pest Management Science 59, 748753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Correnti, J. M. and Pearce, E. J. (2004). Transgene expression in Schistosoma mansoni: introduction of RNA into schistosomula by electroporation. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 137, 7579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Correnti, J. M., Brindley, P. J. and Pearce, E. J. (2005). Long-term suppression of cathepsin B levels by RNA interference retards schistosome growth. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 143, 209215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dinguirard, N. and Yoshino, T. P. (2006). Potential role of a CD36-like class B scavenger receptor in the binding of modified low-density lipoprotein (acLDL) to the tegumental surface of Schistosoma mansoni sporocysts. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 146, 219230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djikeng, A., Shen, S., Tschudi, C. and Ullu, E. (2004). Analysis of gene function in Trypanosoma brucei using RNA interference. Methods in Molecular Biology 265, 7383.Google ScholarPubMed
Fanelli, E., Di Vito, M., Jones, J. T. and De Giorgi, C. (2005). Analysis of chitin synthase function in a plant parasitic nematode, Meloidogyne artiellia, using RNAi. Gene 349, 8795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fire, A., Xu, S., Montgomery, M. K., Kostas, S. A., Driver, S. E. and Mello, C. C. (1998). Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature, London 408, 325330.Google Scholar
Ford, L., Guiliano, D. B., Oksov, Y., Debnath, A. K., Liu, J., Williams, S. A., Blaxter, M. L. and Lustigman, S. (2005). Characterization of a novel filarial serine protease inhibitor, Ov-SPI-1, from Onchocerca volvulus, with potential multifunctional roles during development of the parasite. Journal of Biological Chemistry 280, 40 84540 856.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geldhof, P., Murray, L., Couthier, A., Gilleard, J. S., McLauchlan, G., Knox, D. P. and Britton, C. (2006). Testing the efficacy of RNA interference in Haemonchus contortus. International Journal for Parasitology 36, 801810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghedin, E., Wang, S., Foster, J. M. and Slatko, B. E. (2004). First sequenced genome of a parasitic nematode. Trends in Parasitology 20, 151153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grishok, A. (2005). RNAi mechanisms in Caenorhabditis elegans. FEBS Letters 579, 59325939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hannon, G. J. (2002). RNA interference. Nature, London 418, 244251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, G., Allen, R., Davis, E. L., Baum, T. J. and Hussey, R. S. (2006). Engineering broad root-knot resistance in transgenic plants by RNAi silencing of a conserved and essential root-knot nematode parasitism gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 103, 14 30214 306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hussein, A. S., Kichenin, K. and Selkirk, M. E. (2002). Suppression of secreted acetylcholinesterase expression in Nippostrongylus brasiliensis by RNA interference. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 122, 9194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Islam, M. K., Miyoshi, T., Yamada, M. and Tsuji, N. (2005). Pyrophosphatase of the roundworm Ascaris suum plays an essential role in the worm's molting and development. Infection and Immunity 73, 19952004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Issa, Z., Grant, W. N., Stasiuk, S. and Shoemaker, C. B. (2005). Development of methods for RNA interference in the sheep gastrointestinal parasite, Trichostrongylus colubriformis. International Journal for Parasitology 35, 935940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaubert, S., Ledger, T. N., Laffaire, J. B., Abad, P. and Rosso, M. (2002). Direct identification of stylet proteins from root nematodes by a proteomic approach. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 121, 205211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennerdell, J. R. and Carthew, R. W. (1998). Use of dsRNA-mediated genetic interference to demonstrate that frizzled and frizzled 2 act in the wingless pathway. Cell 95, 10171026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kotze, A. C. and Bagnall, N. H. (2005). RNA interference in Haemonchus contortus: suppression of beta-tubulin gene expression in L3, L4 and adult worms in vitro. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 145, 101110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lander, E. S. and Waterman, M. S. (1988). Genomic mapping by fingerprinting random clones: a mathematical analysis. Genomics 2, 231239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lilley, C. J., Goodchild, S. A., Atkinson, H. J. and Urwin, P. E. (2005). Cloning and characterisation of a Heterodera glycines aminopeptidase cDNA. International Journal for Parasitology 35, 15771585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lustigman, S., Zhang, J., Liu, J., Oksov, Y. and Hashmi, S. (2004). RNA interference targeting cathepsin L and Z-like cysteine proteases of Onchocerca volvulus confirmed their essential function during L3 molting. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 138, 165170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oelgeschlager, M., Larrain, J., Geissert, D. and De Robertis, E. M. (2000). The evolutionarily conserved BMP-binding protein Twisted gastrulation promotes BMP signaling. Nature, London 405, 757763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrish, S. and Fire, A. (2001). Distinct roles for RDE-1 and RDE-4 during RNA interference in Caenorhabditis elegans. RNA 7, 13971402.Google ScholarPubMed
Pfarr, K., Heider, U. and Hoerauf, A. (2006). RNAi mediated silencing of actin expression in adult Litomosoides sigmodontis is specific, persistent and results in a phenotype. International Journal for Parasitology 36, 661669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosso, M. N., Dubrana, M. P., Cimbolini, N., Jaubert, S. and Abad, P. (2005). Application of RNA interference to root-knot nematode genes encoding esophageal gland proteins. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 18, 615620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scacheri, P. C., Rozenblatt-Rosen, O., Caplen, N. J., Wolfsberg, T. G., Umayam, L., Lee, J. C., Hughes, C. M., Shanmugam, K. S., Bhattacharjee, A., Meyerson, M. and Collins, F. S. (2004). Short interfering RNAs can induce unexpected and divergent changes in the levels of untargeted proteins in mammalian cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101, 18921897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shingles, J., Lilley, C. J., Atkinson, H. J. and Urwin, P. E. (2006). Meloidogyne incognita: Molecular and biochemical characterisation of a cathepsin L cysteine proteinase and the effect on parasitism following RNAi. Experimental Parasitology [Epub ahead of print].Google ScholarPubMed
Skelly, P. J., Da'dara, A. and Harn, D. A. (2003). Suppression of cathepsin B expression in Schistosoma mansoni by RNA interference. International Journal for Parasitology 33, 363369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabara, H., Sarkissian, M., Kelly, W. G., Fleenor, J., Grishok, A., Timmons, L., Fire, A. and Mello, C. C. (1999). The rde-1 gene, RNA interference and transposon silencing in C. elegans. Cell 99, 123132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tavernarakis, N., Wang, S. L., Dorovkov, M., Ryazanov, A. and Driscoll, M. (2000). Heritable and inducible genetic interference by double-stranded RNA encoded by transgenes. Nature Genetics 24, 180183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ullu, E., Tshudi, C. and Chakraborty, T. (2004). RNA interference in protozoan parasites. Cell Microbiology 6, 509519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urwin, P. E., Lilley, C. J. and Atkinson, H. J. (2002). Ingestion of double-stranded RNA by preparasitic juvenile cyst nematodes leads to RNA interference. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 15, 747752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Visser, A., Geldhof, P., De Maere, V., Knox, D. P., Vercruysse, J. and Claerebout, E. (2006). Efficacy and specificity of RNA interference in larval life-stages of Ostertagia ostertagi. Parasitology 31, 17.Google Scholar
Yadav, B. C., Veluthambi, K. and Subramaniam, K. (2006). Host-generated double stranded RNA induces RNAi in plant-parasitic nematodes and protects the host from infection. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 148, 219222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed