Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T07:54:55.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is small placenta a risk for low birth weight in KOKAN? (Data from a coastal region in the state of Maharashtra, India)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2020

Suvarna Patil*
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, BKL Walawalkar Hospital and Rural Medical College, Sawarde, Taluka-Chiplun District-Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India
Vijay Dombale
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, BKL Walawalkar Hospital and Rural Medical College, Sawarde, Taluka-Chiplun, District-Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India
Charudatta Joglekar
Affiliation:
Statistics Unit, Regional Centre for Adolescent Health and Nutrition, BKL Walawalkar Hospital and Rural Medical College, Sawarde, Taluka-Chiplun, District-Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India
Netaji Patil
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, BKL Walawalkar Hospital and Rural Medical College, Sawarde, Taluka-Chiplun, District-Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India
Kiran Joshi
Affiliation:
Department Obstetrics and Gynaecology, BKL Walawalkar Hospital and Rural Medical College, Sawarde, Taluka-Chiplun, District-Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India
Bhushan Warpe
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, BKL Walawalkar Hospital and Rural Medical College, Sawarde, Taluka-Chiplun, District-Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India
Pushpa Burute
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, BKL Walawalkar Hospital and Rural Medical College, Sawarde, Taluka-Chiplun, District-Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India
*
Address for correspondence: Suvarna Patil, Department of Medicine, BKL Walawalkar Hospital and Rural Medical College, Sawarde, Taluka-Chiplun District-Ratnagiri, Maharashtra415606, India. Email: dr.suvarnanpatil@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

KOKAN region is characterized by undernutrition across all stages of lifecycle. Developmental Origins of Health & Disease hypothesis suggests that environmental influences in the early period of growth and development can contribute to the risks of noncommunicable diseases (NCD) in adulthood. Newborns and placentas of 815 pregnant mothers delivered in a rural hospital were studied. We tested the hypothesis that low placental weight will be associated with low birth weight (LBW). Mothers had a mean age of 26 years and were smaller in size at delivery [mean height of 152.1 cm (±6.1 cm), weight 52 kg (±10.2 kg), body mass index (BMI) 22.5 kg/m2 (±4.1 kg/m2)]. Mean placental weight was 488 g (±120 g). Mean birth weight, length, and head circumference of the newborn were 2.54 kg (±0.5 kg), 46.3 cm (±3.1 cm), and 32.7 cm (±1.7 cm), respectively. Prevalence of LBW, stunting, and small head size was 41.6%, 42.2%, and 18.2%, respectively. Maternal height, weight, and BMI at delivery were all positively associated with placental weight (p < 0.01 for all). Mothers with placentas in the lowest placental weight tertile had an increased likelihood of producing an LBW baby [OR 7.7, 95% CI (5.0, 11.8)], a stunted baby [OR 1.9 (1.4, 2.9)], or a baby with a small head circumference [OR 2.4 (1.4, 4.0)]. Mothers in the lowest height tertile had odds of producing a LBW baby [OR 1.8 95% CI (1.2, 2.7)] or a stunted baby [OR 1.6 (1.1, 2.3)]. There is a need to improve the nutritional status of women in KOKAN region which may reduce the risk of NCD.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press and the International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 2020

Introduction

The placenta is essential for promoting and maintaining pregnancy and normal fetal development; however, it is normally disposed off after delivery without adequate examination.Reference Afodun, Ajao and Enaibe1 Pregnancy outcome depends on placental morphology and its efficiency to transfer nutrients, gases, waste products, heat, hormones, and other regulatory molecules. Placental morphology, blood flow, and nutrient transport functions primarily determine the growth trajectory of the fetus.Reference Balihallimath, Shirol, Gan, Tyagi and Bandankar2 Genes and lifestyle were long believed to be the predominant risk factors for the development of major noncommunicable diseases (NCD), such as type-2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. However, a large body of epidemiological evidence has challenged this paradigm by demonstrating that adverse influences during early development, in particular in utero, increase the risk of developing these diseases in adult life.Reference Gluckman and Hanson3,Reference Gluckman, Hanson, Cooper and Thornburg4 Birth weight is associated with long-term effects on health and disease in adult life. Low birth weight (LBW) is a well-established risk factor for adverse long-term health, particularly cardiovascular disease and metabolic syndrome.Reference Barker5 Fetal growth is a result of multiple factors including genetic potential for growth, maternal nutrition, maternal metabolism, and endocrine factors. According to the Developmental Origins of Health & Disease (DOHaD) concept, maternal undernutrition has variable effects on placental growth. Placental size and the ratio of placental weight to birth weight have been found to be associated with type-2 diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance.Reference Barker6 In addition, the ability of the fetus to respond to nutrients and other growth regulatory factors may play a role.Reference Cetin, Alvino, Radaelli and Pardi7,Reference Haggarty8 The placenta can react to circulatory and nutritional environmental changes and challenges by adjusting nutrient transfer capacity, thus altering the relative proportions of different types of nutrients supplied to the fetus. These adaptive changes may affect the development of individual fetal tissues, and the pathophysiological consequences can be seen long after birth. Therefore, the placenta may represent a better marker of growth and disease risk in later life than other indices such as birth weight which have been predominantly used to indicate exposure to suboptimal conditions during intrauterine development.Reference Sibley, Turner and Cetin9Reference Lauritzen and Carlson12

The adult population of the KOKAN region of the western Indian state of Maharashtra is poorly nourished and underweight [low body mass index (BMI)].Reference Patil, Kadam and Desai13 Malnourishment has also been observed among adolescent girls in the region.Reference Pevekar, Patil and Chavan14,Reference Patil, Wasnik and Wadke15 A small study in the same area has shown that adolescent girls have high prevalence of micronutrient deficiencies.Reference Patil, Joglekar and Desai16 The prevalence of LBW is also very high.Reference Patil17 Thus, KOKAN population is exposed to under nutrition across all stages of lifecycle. Also the NCD prevalence among adults in this region is very high.Reference Patil, Kadam and Desai13,18 Hence, we decided to focus on the intrauterine stage and study the placental morphology in addition to the size of the mother at the time of delivery. We tested the hypothesis that low placental weight will be associated with LBW.

Methods

Setting and study population

BKL Walawalkar Hospital is located at Dervan village in Ratnagiri District of KOKAN area situated about 250 km south of Mumbai in the Indian state of Maharashtra. The hospital was established in 1995. Since 2010 it has developed a community network for the entire Ratnagiri District with various community programs. Holistic education and nutrition counseling are provided to all newly married girls. The hospital also runs a community-based antenatal care program for pregnant women with educational sessions on safe motherhood. The importance of hospital-based delivery rather than home delivery is explained. Pregnant women are brought to the hospital for investigations during pregnancy and for delivery. Between April 2016 and September 2017, 985 pregnant women registered in the antenatal clinic of the hospital and subsequently delivered in the hospital. Data were retrospectively extracted from the hospital records.

Measures

The women in KOKAN are undernourished. Maternal undernutrition affects placental growth. We used maternal BMI at the time of delivery as a surrogate for undernutrition. The placenta supplies nutrients to the fetus ultimately affecting the development of fetal tissues. We measured birth weight and also carried out neonatal anthropometry.

Maternal data

Current obstetric history (gravida, parity) and history of previous pregnancies (abortions, terminations, still births, intrauterine deaths, live deliveries) were collected at the time of registration in the antenatal clinic of the hospital. We collected data on current age, birth order, age at menarche, age at marriage, and age at 1st pregnancy. Maternal height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a stadiometer. Maternal weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg. BMI was calculated. Height and weight were measured immediately after the women reported to the hospital for delivery and their BMI calculated. Gestational age at delivery was estimated in weeks based on the last menstrual period (LMP) and the date of delivery.

Neonatal data

Anthropometric measurements (weight, length, head circumference, chest circumference) and mid upper arm circumference (MUAC) were recorded in babies immediately after birth using standardized protocol.

Those with gestational age at delivery < 37 weeks were classified as preterm.

Placental data

All the placental measurements were carried out immediately after delivery. The placenta was weighed using an electronic balance. The length (largest diameter) and breadth (smallest diameter) were measured. Placental thickness at maximum was measured. Placental volume was measured by the method described by Scherle.Reference Scherle19 Initially, a large empty plastic container was placed on a flat surface. At the center of this container, a steel container was placed which was filled with water up to the brim without spill over into the surrounding container. Placenta was placed in the steel container without dipping hands or fingers. The placenta displaced the water in the steel container into the empty plastic container surrounding it. After the placenta displaced no more water, the steel container containing the placenta was carefully removed. The displaced water in the plastic container was transferred into a graduated cylinder which is commonly used to measure the volume of a liquid. Thus, the volume of the displaced water was used to indicate the placental volume.

Ethics approval and consents

Written consent to use the data collected for the purpose of research was taken from individual pregnant women at the time of registration in the antenatal clinic. The hospital ethics committee approved use of relevant data from hospital records for the purpose of analysis and publication. Our institute ethics committee (BKL Walawalkar Rural Medical College and Hospital) is registered with the government of India with registration code as EC/755/INST/MH/2015/RR-18. The registration document is available at https://cdsco.gov.in/opencms/opencms/en/Clinical-Trial/Ethics-Committee/Ethics-Committee-Re-Registration/index.html.

Selection of sample for analysis

Totally, 985 pregnant women registered in hospital antenatal clinic for delivery. Sixty-one women were excluded (Figure 1). Of these one had tested positive for HIV, 20 had intrauterine fetal death, and 40 women could not recall the date of their LMP in order to have an accurate estimation of the gestational age at delivery. Remaining 924 delivered live-born babies. Of these 18 delivered twins, 13 had preexisting hypertension, and 2 were prediabetic. After exclusion of these, we were left with 891 mothers with single live-born babies. We further excluded 76 mothers who did not have placental data. Remaining 815 mothers formed our analysis sample.

Fig. 1. Selection of sample.

Comparisons with international standards

LBW was defined as weight at birth <2500 g. We used World Health Organization (WHO) standards to compare the size at birth (weight, length, head circumference) using standard deviation (SD) scores.20 Stunting was defined as length SD score <−2 and small head as head circumference SD score <−2.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean and SD for continuous variables. Normality of each continuous variable was checked using Shapiro–Wilks test. Those not normal were appropriately transformed. Data on categorical variables are shown as percentages. Comparison between the two groups was done using analysis of variance. Associations between neonatal anthropometry indices and maternal exposures including the placental data are shown by partial correlations adjusting for gestation at delivery, sex of the newborn, and maternal parity. Significant determinants of LBW, stunting, and small head circumference at birth were investigated by multiple logistic regression analysis using models with and without placental weight. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Model fit was tested using McFadden R 2. The SPSS version 16.0 for windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago) was used for statistical analysis.

Results

Mothers

Table 1 shows maternal characteristics. Mean age of menarche was 14 years (± 1.4 years) and 55% were primiparous with a mean height of 152.1 cm (± 6.1 cm), while the weight at the time of delivery was 52 kg (± 10.2 kg). Slightly more than 50% of the mothers were delivered by caesarean section

Table 1. Characteristics of the pregnant mothers admitted for delivery

* n(%) otherwise mean (SD).

Babies and placental measurements

Table 2 shows the data on neonates (all combined and also according to sex). Proportion of those delivered preterm was 19.5%, and it was similar in both the sexes. Girls were lighter, shorter, and had a smaller head compared to boys. More than 40% neonates were born LBW though the proportion was significantly higher in girls. Using WHO standards for newborns, more than 40% had a length SD score of below −2 and 18% had a head circumference SD score below −2. Other anthropometric indices (chest circumference, abdominal circumference, and MUAC) were similar.

Table 2. Characteristics of the newborns and placentas

* n(%) otherwise mean (SD).

p adjusted for gestation at delivery for anthropometric parameters.

Except placental weight (g)/birth weight (kg) ratio, which was higher in girls all, other placental measurements were similar in the two sexes (Table 2).

Mother–baby association

We used the maternal height as an indicator of the mothers own fetal and adolescence growth, age at menarche as a puberty indicator, and BMI at delivery as an indicator of nutrition in pregnancy. Maternal height was strongly associated with fetal weight and length and moderately (yet significantly) with head circumference. Mothers age at menarche was not associated with any of the babies anthropometric measures. Maternal weight and BMI were associated with baby’s weight, head circumference, chest circumference, and MUAC.

Placenta–baby associations

Placental volume and placental weight were related to most of the neonatal measurement except MUAC (Table 3). Diameters (largest as well as smallest) were related to neonatal weight, head circumference, and chest circumference. Placental thickness was directly associated with birth weight and inversely with MUAC.

Table 3. Correlations between maternal, placental and neonatal measurements

Circ: circumference.

Figures are partial correlations adjusted for gestation at delivery, maternal parity, and sex of the baby, *p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

Placenta–mother association

Maternal height, weight, and BMI were strongly correlated with placental volume and placental weight (p < 0.01 for all, data not shown). Other placental measurements (diameters, thickness, and the surface area) were not associated.

Multiple logistic regression of small size at birth

We divided maternal height, BMI, placental weight, and maternal age at menarche into tertiles. In a logistic regression (Fig. 2, Model 1), including maternal height, BMI, maternal age at menarche, gestation, sex, parity, LBW was independently associated with maternal height and maternal BMI. Shortest mothers, i.e., those in the lowest tertile for the height, were 1.93 times more likely to have LBW neonate compared to those in the highest (95% CI 1.31, 2.86). Those in the lowest tertile of the BMI had 3.01 times higher risk compared to those in the highest (95% CI 2.01, 4.45). With the addition of placental weight (Fig. 2, Model-2), those in the lowest tertile of placental weight had 7.69 times higher risk compared to those in the highest (95% CI 5.01, 11.8). Variance explained by each model using Mcfadden R2 was 15.4% for model 1 and 24.6% for the model 2. Similarly, we observed an independent effect of placental weight on stunting of the neonate. As shown in Supplementary Figure 1, mothers in the lowest tertile of height, BMI, and placental weight had significant risks of delivering the stunted neonate [OR 1.55, 95% CI (1.05, 2.30)], [OR 1.51, 95% CI (1.03, 2.23)], and [OR 1.99, 95% CI (1.35, 2.96)], respectively. The variances for both the models were 5.3% and 6.6%, respectively. Those in the lowest tertile of placental weight independently predicted smaller head circumference of the neonate [OR 2.4, 95% CI (1.43, 4.04)], and the variances were 12.9% an 14.8%, respectively (Supplementary Figure 2).

Fig. 2. Determinants of low birth weight. (Multiple logistic regression.)

Discussion

We have measured maternal size, newborn size, and placental parameters at delivery in a large sample of rural pregnant Indian women. Mothers were short in stature, and their mean BMI at the time of delivery was only 22.5 kg/m2 (± 6.1 kg/m2). About 20% neonates were born preterm. Except weight, length, and head circumference, which were higher in males, all the other anthropometric parameters were similar in both sexes. Among various placental parameters measured, only placental weight/birth weight ratio was higher in female neonates. Other parameters were similar. Maternal size measures (weight and height) at delivery were associated with fetal size (weight, length, and head). Low placental weight independently predicted LBW, stunting, and small head. Many studies have reported data on placental weight, volume, and morphology and their associations with postnatal outcomes. A study on geographical variations in neonatal phenotype reports data on placental weight in many regions of the world including India.Reference Leary, Fall and Osmond21 Mean placental weight reported in the studies from India is much smaller than our mean of 488 g (± 120 g). Our results are very much similar to the Stork study from Norway which showed the mediatory role of placental weight in mother–baby associations.Reference Roland, Friis and Voldner22 Another report from Norway showed an association between placental weight/birth weight ratio and cardiovascular mortality in the adulthood,Reference Risnes, Romundstad and Nilsen23 but our study does not have any post-natal measurements except size at birth. A report from Jamaica found an association between placental volume (measured at three times in pregnancy) and placental growth rate with fetal size.Reference Thame, Osmond and Bennett24 A study from rural India reported association of mid pregnancy placental volume with birth weight.Reference Kinare, Natekar and Chinchwadkar25 Our placental volume measurement is only at delivery, and it was associated with fetal size. A study of babies born full term from Qatar has shown an association of placental weight with size at birth as well as childhood growth.Reference Soliman, Eldabbagh and Saleem26 We do not have any post-natal measures. A study from MalaysiaReference Sivarao, Vidyadaran and Jammal27 compared birth outcomes and placental parameters among three ethnicities (Malay, Chinese, and Indian) and found that size at birth and placental parameters (surface area, weight, and volume) were smallest in Indians. There are many studies from India describing associations of different maternal and placental measures with post-natal outcomes. A hospital-based cohort study from city of Mysore in the state of Karnataka in south India has reported association of maternal body composition, especially the fat mass and head circumference with the fetal growth.Reference Winder, Krishnaveni and Veena28 Our study has measured body composition only by measuring weight, height, and BMI at delivery which was associated with size at birth. The same study also found an association between placental breadth and blood pressure in the offspringReference Winder, Krishnaveni and Hill29 at 9 years of age. We do not have any post-natal measures except size at birth. A report from the same state but from a different city of Bangalore reported inverse association between eccentric placentas in small for gestational age (SGA) babies and birth weight.Reference Ravikumar, Crasta and Prabhu30 Another report from the same city measured cell marker antibody (CD15) and found immaturity in fetoplacental endothelium in IUGR placentas.Reference Ravikumar, Crasta and Prabhu31 Neither we have investigated eccentric placentas nor we have measured CD15. A report from another south Indian state of Kerala reported positive association of placental weight and birth weightReference Jaya, Kumar and Bai32 similar to our finding. In all the Indian studies, except the one measuring placental volume,Reference Kinare, Natekar and Chinchwadkar25 the populations were urban or semi urban. Our study population is rural. Placenta is the source of nutrients to the fetus. We observed significant sex differences in neonatal measurements of weight, length, and head, but not so in others (abdomen, MUAC, and chest). This might suggest the sex-specific role of nutrients on fetal growth. This could also be due to variation in maturation.Reference DiPietro and Voegtline33 A study in the United StatesReference Sood, Zehnder and Druzin34 on human placenta samples that were obtained after delivery found gender difference in the expression of some genes in placenta. It also identified some genes (e.g. FPR1, LILRB4, APOE) which were associated with lower birth weight as well as some (e.g. RHOBT1!, NCOA3) which were associated with higher birth weight.

To our knowledge, this is the first report on how the parameters of placental weight, volume, and morphological measurements are associated with birth outcomes from an impoverished and largely understudied KOKAN area of India. We have done comprehensive measurements of placenta. We believe that this is a major strength of our study. But there are many limitations of our study. We have not preserved the placenta samples. Our report is hospital based and hence representativeness of the sample could be questioned. But, due to the implementation of our holistic and antenatal care programs, women in this region have a distinct preference for delivery at our hospital. Another limitation is the lack of preconception size measures hence we cannot comment on weight gain in pregnancy. Nutrient transfer from mother to fetus takes place through placenta, but we do not have any measures of diet or blood nutrients in pregnancy. This is the major limitation of our study. A woman’s BMI at the time of delivery needs to be corrected as the weight of the fetus in utero contributes to the maternal weight. We subtracted the birth weight of the neonate from the maternal weight at delivery to get the true estimate of the mother’s weight at delivery. The estimated mean weight was 49.1 kg (±10.1 kg). Estimated mean BMI at delivery was only 21.4 kg/m2 (±4.1 kg/m2). These measurements, although were estimated, highlight the undernourished status of the mother at the time of delivery.

Our data showed a strong correlation between the maternal and placental parameters at delivery with fetal weight, length, and head circumference. Multivariate analysis shows a significant correlation between placental weight and outcomes such as LBW, stunting, and small head circumference. After inclusion of placental weight in the logistic regression analysis, there was a rise of 60% (15.4% to 24.6%) in the variance explained (Fig. 2) for LBW, 24% (5.3% to 6.6%) for stunting (Supplementary Figure 1), and 14.7% (12.9% to 14.8%) for small head circumference (Supplementary Figure 2). Head circumference is widely used as a surrogate for brain size. Our analysis has replicated many findings from previous research done in different parts of the world. But what makes our report unique is that unlike other reports, women in our region are poorly nourished and underweight.Reference Patil, Kadam and Desai13 Also, this area has a high incidence of NCDReference Patil, Kadam and Desai13 as well as a high incidence of under nutrition at the time of delivery as demonstrated in this report. A small study on adolescent girls in our region has demonstrated the inadequacy of major nutrients in their diet as well as blood.Reference Patil, Joglekar and Desai16 Therefore, KOKAN women begin their pregnancy with poor nourishment which affects their size and body composition at the time of conception. The role of placenta is crucial because it acts as the transporter of nutrients to the fetus. Our data indicate that maternal size (height, weight, and BMI) has a significant impact on placental weight and neonatal size. Maternal height is an indicator of the mother’s own fetal and adolescence growth. Maternal anthropometric factors are modifiable determinants of fetal growth. Recent papers have linked size of the newborn with the risk of developing coronary heart disease,Reference McCormick35Reference Lawlor, Ronalds and Clark38 hypertension,Reference Barker39Reference Law, Egger and Dada42 and diabetes mellitusReference Hales, Barker and Clark43Reference Rich-Edwards, Colditz and Stampfer45 demonstrating the importance of optimal fetal growth on health in later life. Improving the fetal growth in antenatal period may reduce the morbidity and mortality of newborns and long-term risks of chronic diseases. There is an urgent need to focus on the health of an adolescent girl before she conceives to decrease the incidence of NCDs in the future generations.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the community, in particular the pregnant mothers in their antenatal clinic for taking part in this study. The authors would like to extend their special thanks to Dr Sanjiv Patankar, Educator and advisor to the Department of Surgery, BKL Walawalkar Hospital for the final editing of the manuscript.

Financial support

The study was conducted as a part of hospital funded holistic education program. It did not receive any specific grant from private or public sectors.

Conflicts of interest

None of the authors associated with this manuscript had any financial or personal conflicts of interest.

Author contributor statement

SP conceptualized the study and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. VD, NP, KJ, and BV supervised the placental data collection. CJ analyzed the data and also wrote the results and interpretations of the data analysis. PB supervised placental morphology data collection.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S2040174420000574

References

Afodun, AM, Ajao, MS, Enaibe, BU. Placental anthropometric features: maternal and neonate characteristics in North Central Nigeria. Adv Anat. 2015; 2015, 790617.Google Scholar
Balihallimath, RL, Shirol, VS, Gan, AM, Tyagi, NK, Bandankar, MR. Placentalmorphometry determines the birth weight. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013; 7, 24282431.Google ScholarPubMed
Gluckman, PD, Hanson, MA, Living with the past: evolution, development, and patterns of disease. Science. 2004; 305, 17331736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gluckman, PD, Hanson, MA, Cooper, C, Thornburg, KL. Effect of in utero and early-life conditions on adult health and disease. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359, 6173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barker, DJ. The long-term outcome of retarded fetal growth. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 40, 853863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barker, DJ. The malnourished baby and infant. Br Med Bull. 2001; 60: 6988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cetin, I, Alvino, G,Radaelli, T, Pardi, G. Fetal nutrition: a review. Acta Paediatr. 2005; 94, 713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haggarty, P. Placental regulation of fatty acid delivery and its effect on fetal growth—a review. Placenta. 2002; 23(Suppl A), S28S38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sibley, CP, Turner, MA, Cetin, I, et al. Placental phenotypes of intrauterine growth. Pediatr Res. 2005; 58, 827–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Constancia, M, Angiolini, I, Sandovici, I, et al. Adaptation of nutrient supply to fetal demand in the mouse involves interaction between the Igf2 gene and placental transporter systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005; 102, 1921919224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Odorisio, T, Cianfarani, F, Failla, CM, Zambruno, G. The placenta growth factor in skin angiogenesis. J Dermatol Sci. 2006; 41, 1119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lauritzen, L, Carlson, SE. Maternal fatty acid status during pregnancy and lactation and relation to newborn and infant status. Matern Child Nutr. 2011; 7(Suppl 2), 4158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patil, S, Kadam, S, Desai, M, et al. Diabetes in KOKAN region of India. World J Diabetes. 2019; 10, 3746.Google Scholar
Pevekar, KS, Patil, SN, Chavan, AJ. Psychsocial study of adolescent girls from rural Konkan region (Maharashtra). Int J Res Med Sci 2015; 3: 27452750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patil, SN, Wasnik, VR, Wadke, R. Health problems amongst adolescent girls in rural areas of Ratnagiri district of Maharashtra, India. J Clin Diag Res. 2009; 3: 17841790.Google Scholar
Patil, S, Joglekar, C, Desai, M, et al. Nutritional status and psychological impairment in rural adolescent girls: pilot data from “KOKAN” Region of Western India. Front Public Health. 2018; 6, 160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patil, S. Holistic antenatal care for rural areas- challenges and solutions. Int J Curr Res. 2017; 9, 5315153153.Google Scholar
International Institute of Population Sciences. National Family Health Survey, India: Key Findings from NFHS-4. Available from: http://rchiips.org/nfhs/factsheet_NFHS-4.shtml Google Scholar
Scherle, WF. A simple method for volumetry of organ in quantitative stereology. Mikroskopie. 1970; 26, 5760.Google ScholarPubMed
The WHO Child Growth Standards. http://www.who.int/childgrowth/standards/en/. Accessed October 1, 2018.Google Scholar
Leary, S, Fall, C, Osmond, C, et al. Geographical variation in neonatal phenotype. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006; 85, 10801089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roland, MC, Friis, CM, Voldner, N, et al. Fetal growth versus birthweight: the role of placenta versus other determinants. PLoS One. 2012; 7, e39324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Risnes, KR, Romundstad, PR, Nilsen, TI, et al. Placental weight relative to birth weight and long-term cardiovascular mortality: findings from a cohort of 31,307 men and women. Am J Epidemiol. 2009; 170, 622631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thame, M, Osmond, C, Bennett, F, et al. Fetal growth is directly related to maternal anthropometry and placental volume. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004; 58, 894900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinare, AS, Natekar, AS, Chinchwadkar, MC, et al. Low midpregnancy placental volume in rural Indian women: a cause for low birth weight? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 182, 443448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soliman, AT, Eldabbagh, M, Saleem, W, et al. Placental weight: relation to maternal weight and growth parameters of full-term babies at birth and during childhood. J Trop Pediatr. 2013; 59, 358364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sivarao, S, Vidyadaran, MK, Jammal, AB, et al. Weight, volume and surface area of placenta of normal pregnant women and their relation to maternal and neonatal parameters in Malay, Chinese and Indian ethnic groups. Placenta. 2002; 23, 691696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winder, NR, Krishnaveni, GV, Veena, SR, et al. Mother’s lifetime nutrition and the size, shape and efficiency of the placenta. Placenta. 2011; 32, 806810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winder, NR, Krishnaveni, GV, Hill, JC, et al. Placental programming of blood pressure in Indian children. Acta Paediatr. 2011; 100, 653660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ravikumar, G, Crasta, J, Prabhu, JS, et al. Eccentric placentae have reduced surface area and are associated with lower birth weight in babies small for gestational age. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2018; 9, 281286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ravikumar, G, Crasta, J, Prabhu, JS, et al. CD15 as a marker of fetoplacental endothelial immaturity in IUGR placentas. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019; 32, 16461653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaya, DS, Kumar, NS, Bai, LS. Anthropometric indices, cord length and placental weight in newborns. Indian Pediatr. 1995; 32, 11831188.Google ScholarPubMed
DiPietro, JA, Voegtline, KM. The gestational foundation of sex differences in development and vulnerability. Neuroscience 2017; 342, 420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sood, R, Zehnder, JL, Druzin, ML, et al. Gene expression patterns in human placenta. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(14), 54785483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCormick, MC. The contribution of low birth weight to infant mortality and childhood morbidity. N Engl J Med. 1985; 312, 8290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, DJ. Fetal origins of coronary heart disease. BMJ. 1995; 311, 171174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roseboom, TJ, van der Meulen, JH, Osmond, C, et al. Coronary heart disease after prenatal exposure to the Dutch famine, 1944–45. Heart 2000; 84, 595598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawlor, DA, Ronalds, G, Clark, H, et al. Birth weight is inversely associated with incident coronary heart disease and stroke among individuals born in the 1950s: findings from the Aberdeen Children of the 1950s prospective cohort study. Circulation 2005; 112, 14141418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barker, DJ. Birth weight and hypertension. Hypertension 2006; 48, 357358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Launer, LJ, Hofman, A, Grobbee, DE. Relation between birth weight and blood pressure: longitudinal study of infants and children. BMJ 1993; 307, 14511454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koupilová, I, Leon, DA, McKeigue, PM, et al. Is the effect of low birth weight on cardiovascular mortality mediated through high blood pressure? J Hypertens. 1999; 17, 1925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Law, CM, Egger, P, Dada, O et al. Body size at birth and blood pressure among children in developing countries. Int J Epidemiol. 2001; 30, 5257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hales, CN, Barker, DJ, Clark, PM, et al. Fetal and infant growth and impaired glucose tolerance at age 64. BMJ 1991; 303, 10191022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lithell, HO, McKeigue, PM, Berglund, L, et al. Relation of size at birth to non-insulin dependent diabetes and insulin concentrations in men aged 50-60 years. BMJ 1996; 312, 406410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rich-Edwards, JW, Colditz, GA, Stampfer, MJ, et al. Birthweight and the risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus in adult women. Ann Intern Med. 1999; 130: 278284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Selection of sample.

Figure 1

Table 1. Characteristics of the pregnant mothers admitted for delivery

Figure 2

Table 2. Characteristics of the newborns and placentas

Figure 3

Table 3. Correlations between maternal, placental and neonatal measurements

Figure 4

Fig. 2. Determinants of low birth weight. (Multiple logistic regression.)

Supplementary material: File

Patil et al. supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Patil et al. supplementary material(File)
File 151.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Patil et al. supplementary material

Figure S2

Download Patil et al. supplementary material(File)
File 153.5 KB