Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T01:53:52.659Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Herb–subshrub diversity in open savanna sites with distinct fire regimes in the Jalapão region, Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2022

Guilherme Medeiros Antar*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão 277, São Paulo, SP, 05508-090, Brazil Instituto Tecnológico Vale, Rua Boaventura da Silva 955, Belém, PA66055-090, Brazil
Vânia Regina Pivello
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão, Travessa 14, São Paulo, SP05508-090, Brazil
Caian Souza Gerolamo
Affiliation:
Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão 277, São Paulo, SP, 05508-090, Brazil
Anselmo Nogueira
Affiliation:
Centro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas, Universidade Federal do ABC, Alameda da Universidade, São Bernardo do Campo, SP, 09606-045, Brazil
Paulo Takeo Sano
Affiliation:
Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão 277, São Paulo, SP, 05508-090, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Guilherme Medeiros Antar, Email: guilherme.antar@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The fire regime is essential in creating a mosaic of plant structure and diversity in South American open savannas, especially favouring herbs. However, studies investigating diversity patterns in Neotropical savannas rarely focus on the herb–subshrub layer. This study investigated the variation of the herb–subshrub layer under contrasting fire regimes in the most conserved site within the Cerrado Domain, the Jalapão region, Brazil. We selected four sites of open savanna physiognomy with similar topographic, climatic and edaphic features: three burned every 2 years, while the fourth site has remained unburned for at least the last 10 years. We randomly distributed 15 plots of 4 m2 in each site and identified all herbs and subshrubs in each plot to estimate density, richness, alpha diversity and species composition. The unburned site had lower herb–subshrub density, richness and diversity than the frequently burned sites. Species composition varied between frequently burned and unburned sites, partially explained by the fire frequency across sites. Although other ecological factors may explain the patterns detected, we cannot rule out the importance of fire in structuring plant communities in the Jalapão region. As in other savannas, our study in the Cerrado Domain reinforces the essential role of the fire regimes in modifying and maintaining the diversity of herbaceous plants at the landscape scale.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

The Cerrado Domain in Brazil is the most diverse savanna globally and originally covered ca. 2 million km2 (Forzza et al. Reference Forzza, Baumgratz, Bicudo, Canhos, Carvalho, Coelho, Costa, Costa, Hopkins, Leitman, Lohmann, Lughadha, Maia, Martinelli, Menezes, Morim, Peixoto, Pirani, Prado, Queiroz, Souza, Souza, Stehmann, Sylvestre, Walter and Zappi2012, Ratter et al. Reference Ratter, Ribeiro and Bridgewater1997). Although more than 50% of the Cerrado has already been replaced due to human activity (Strassburg et al. Reference Strassburg, Brooks, Feltran-Barbieri, Iribarrem, Crouzeilles, Loyola, Latawiec, Oliveira Filho, Scaramuzza, Scarano, Soares-Filho and Balmford2017), the largest extension of well-conserved and protected Cerrado is the Jalapão region, in the far east of Tocantins state (Antar & Sano Reference Antar and Sano2019, Silva & Bates Reference Silva and Bates2002). The main reasons for the Jalapão region still being mostly undisturbed are the dystrophic soils, low human density, the presence of traditional community lands (quilombolas’ homelands – maroon communities) that are mostly well conserved, and large legally protected areas, of which the most important are Jalapão State Park (JSP), the Serra Geral do Tocantins Ecological Station, Jalapão Environmental Protection Area (JEPA) and Nascentes do Parnaíba National Park (Camarâ & Leite Reference Câmara and Leite2005, Schmidt et al. Reference Schmidt, Figueiredo and Scariot2007, Silva & Bates Reference Silva and Bates2002). The region is also recognised for its high plant diversity, which, although not completely known, is expected to number more than 1000 species, many of them recently described (Antar & Sano Reference Antar and Sano2019, Araújo et al. Reference Araújo, Antar and Lombardi2016, Barbosa-Silva & Antar Reference Barbosa-Silva and Antar2020, Devecchi & Pirani Reference Devecchi and Pirani2015, Moreira et al. Reference Moreira, Antar, Simão-Bianchini and Cavalcanti2017, Pastore & Antar Reference Pastore and Antar2021, Proença et al. Reference Proença, Farias-Singer and Gomes2007).

One of the major abiotic factors traditionally associated with the ecology and evolution of the Cerrado Domain flora is fire (Coutinho Reference Coutinho1990, Miranda et al. Reference Miranda, Bustamante, Miranda, Oliveira and Marquis2002, Pivello, Reference Pivello2011, Simon et al. Reference Simon, Grether, Queiroz, Skema, Pennington and Hughes2009). In the Jalapão region, fire occurrence is widespread. It generates a mosaic of different degrees of disturbance across the landscape, making it very hard to find areas unburned for more than 3 years (Pereira Jr. et al. Reference Pereira-Júnior, Oliveira, Pereira and Turkman2014, Schmidt et al. Reference Schmidt, Figueiredo and Scariot2007, Schmidt et al. Reference Schmidt, Moura, Ferreira, Eloy, Sampaio, Dias and Berlinck2018). In this environment, the fire occurrence is natural and has shaped its physiognomy and diversity for about 4 million years (Simon et al. Reference Simon, Grether, Queiroz, Skema, Pennington and Hughes2009). Several studies have recognised the importance of fire in structuring plant communities. For example, burned areas in the Cerrado of the Federal District show higher species richness in the herbaceous layer than in unburned areas (César Reference César1980); frequent fires promote intense flowering in several herbaceous species (Coutinho Reference Coutinho1976, Fidelis & Zirondi Reference Fidelis and Zirondi2021); herbaceous species composition differs among areas with different fire frequencies in the Cerrado of southwestern Goiás State (Loiola et al. Reference Loiola, Cianciaruso, Silva and Batalha2010); richness and diversity were higher in experimentally burned areas than in unburned areas of the Jalapão region (Santos Reference Santos2019); and recurrent burns during the year increase the dominance of Poaceae in the herbaceous layer (Miranda Reference Miranda2002).

Over time and especially in recent decades, human beings have changed the natural fire regimes according to their activities, increasing frequency and moving the season to the driest period (Pivello Reference Pivello2011, Pivello et al. Reference Pivello, Vieira, Christianini, Ribeiro, da Silva Menezes, Berlinck, Melo, Marengo, Tornquist, Tomas and Overbeck2021, Schmidt et al. Reference Schmidt, Moura, Ferreira, Eloy, Sampaio, Dias and Berlinck2018). In the 1980s, studies that were part of the Fire Project (Projeto Fogo at IBGE Reserve) started to investigate the consequences of human-induced fire regimes on the Cerrado biodiversity (Dias & Miranda Reference Dias, Miranda and Miranda2010). These studies were focused on the woody plants and corroborated previous research (e.g., Coutinho Reference Coutinho1976) showing that frequent fires would decrease woody plant density and diversity (Hoffmann Reference Hoffmann1999, Sato et al. Reference Sato, Miranda, Maia and Miranda2010, Montenegro Reference Montenegro2019) and generate open physiognomies dominated by grasses and subshrubs, with few woody elements. On the other hand, fire suppression would favour the woody vegetation to the detriment of herb and subshrub species, leading to more woody physiognomies (Miranda et al. Reference Miranda, Neto, Neves and Miranda2010, Moreira, Reference Moreira2000). Further studies have shown that fire exclusion may cause woody plant encroachment and drive the savanna formation to a forest physiognomy (Abreu et al. Reference Abreu, Hoffmann, Vasconcelos, Pilon, Rossatto and Durigan2017, Gonçalves et al. Reference Gonçalves, Cardoso, Oliveira and Oliveira2021, Mariano et al. Reference Mariano, Rebolo and Christianini2019, Moreira Reference Moreira2000, Stevens et al. Reference Stevens, Lehmann, Murphy and Durigan2017).

For several decades, the diversity of the Cerrado herbaceous flora had been neglected in floristic studies, and only more recently has its role as an essential component of the Cerrado biodiversity become clear (Amaral et al. Reference Amaral, Munhoz, Walter, Aguirre-Gutierrez and Raes2017, Durigan et al. Reference Durigan, Pilon, Assis and Souza2018). It is now known that the herbaceous component represents about 80% of the biome plant species, making the Cerrado the richest savanna in the world, with more than 12,700 species (BFG 2015, Durigan et al. Reference Durigan, Pilon, Assis and Souza2018), being most of them – as components of the herbaceous layer – fire-dependent. Also, considering the most abundant or rarest species, the exclusion of fire in the open Cerrado Domain can reduce the diversity of the herb–subshrub layer compared to areas that are burned biennially (Santos Reference Santos2019).

In the Jalapão region, there is a high demand for knowledge on the biodiversity of protected areas and the factors that regulate them, mostly to direct management for their conservation. Some studies on this subject have been recently conducted but focused mostly on swampy palm forests (veredas) and wet fields (Borges et al. Reference Borges, Eloy, Schmidt, Barradas and Santos2016, Schmidt et al. Reference Schmidt, Fidelis, Miranda and Ticktin2017). On the other hand, the unflooded open savannas, the most common physiognomies in the region (Antar & Sano Reference Antar and Sano2019), have been overlooked, with few recent and yet unpublished studies (Montenegro Reference Montenegro2019, Santos Reference Santos2019). Therefore, our aim in this study is to investigate the plant diversity of the herbaceous stratum across different unflooded open savannas in the Jalapão region. Specifically, we compared species density, richness, diversity, and composition in four areas with different fire regimes. We hypothesised that the species composition and structure would differ between areas and that recurrent fires in some areas conditioned the herbaceous stratum to higher density and diversity. Our results can provide detailed information about the spatial variation of plant diversity and fire management in protected areas of the Jalapão region.

Material and methods

Study area

This study was carried out in two neighbouring, protected areas in the Jalapão region (Tocantins state, Brazil): the JSP (10°08’-10°35’ S; 47°04’-47°35’ W) and the JEPA, which surrounds the JSP. The extension of JSP is 158.885 ha (Seplan 2003a), while that of JEPA is 461.730 ha (Seplan 2003b). The regional climate is tropical seasonal, with humid summers and dry winters (Köppen’s Aw) (Alvares et al. Reference Alvares, Stape, Sentelhas, Gonçalves and Sparovek2014). Mean temperatures vary from 23.5 to 26.5 °C, and annual precipitation is ca. 1,500 mm, with 90% of rainfall concentrated between October and March (Seplan 2012). The most common phytophysiognomies in the region are (i) the veredas (riverine palm forest) with the frequent presence of the palm tree Mauritia flexuosa L.f, and (ii) open savannas in unflooded fields, mostly the campo sujo (Antar & Sano Reference Antar and Sano2019, Silva et al. Reference Silva, Amaral, Bijos and Munhos2018). These broad areas of open savannas are characterised almost entirely by a continuous herbaceous layer, while scattered shrubs and trees cover up to 3% of the area (Coutinho, Reference Coutinho, Huntley and Walker1982, Henriques Reference Henriques, Souza-Silva and Felfili2005, Moreira Reference Moreira2000, Ribeiro & Walter Reference Ribeiro, Walter, Sano, Almeida and Ribeiro2008).

Economic activities in the region are mostly related to tourism and secondarily to subsistence agriculture and extensive cattle raising (Câmara & Leite, Reference Câmara and Leite2005, Eloy et al. Reference Eloy, Schmidt, Borges, Ferreira and Santos2018, Schmidt et al. Reference Schmidt, Figueiredo and Scariot2007), in which a common practice is to burn the native vegetation in the dry season to promote plant resprouting to feed the animals (Schmidt et al. Reference Schmidt, Moura, Ferreira, Eloy, Sampaio, Dias and Berlinck2018). The burning of native pastures may lead to fire spreading and accidental wildfires in the surrounding areas (Pereira et al. Reference Pereira-Júnior, Oliveira, Pereira and Turkman2014). On the other hand, seasonal fire management by traditional cattle ranchers may prevent the spread of wildfires in the Brazilian Cerrado (Eloy et al. Reference Eloy, Schmidt, Borges, Ferreira and Santos2018, Pivello et al. Reference Pivello, Vieira, Christianini, Ribeiro, da Silva Menezes, Berlinck, Melo, Marengo, Tornquist, Tomas and Overbeck2021). Large-scale agriculture has not reached this region yet, mostly due to the sandy soils and poor infrastructure for access. However, the agricultural business is expanding its frontiers towards Jalapão (Antar & Sano Reference Antar and Sano2019, Antar et al. Reference Antar, Santos and Sano2017, Barbosa-Silva & Antar Reference Barbosa-Silva and Antar2020, Borges & Antar Reference Borges and Antar2016).

To develop this study, we selected four campo sujo sites (open savanna with scattered woody elements) of approximately 30 ha each, with maximum and minimum distances in a straight line of 7 and 2.7 km and spread over 64 km2 (Figure 1). For decades, three sites have been under a high fire frequency of about 2 years: sites 1 (10°32’07”S; 46°27’14”W), 2 (10°32’05”S; 46°28’51”W) and 3 (10°30’35”S; 46°30’22”W), while at site 4 (10°34’19”S; 46°30’97”W) fire has been suppressed for the last 10 years. Site 4 was the only area protected from fire for a relatively long time that we could find since burning every 2 years is a widespread practice in the region (Pereira-Júnior et al. Reference Pereira-Júnior, Oliveira, Pereira and Turkman2014, Schmidt et al. Reference Schmidt, Figueiredo and Scariot2007). This area has remained unburned for at least 10 years because it is near the JSP guesthouse and surrounded by firebreaks, which are burned every year. The sites selection was based on information about the last burning event provided by the personnel of the protected areas who have worked there for more than 10 years. In addition, we confirmed the burning history for sites 2, 3 and 4 in satellite images from the past 10 years with 1-km resolution (INPE – http://queimadas.dgi.inpe.br/queimadas/aq1km). However, we could not recover the burning history for site 1 due to the unavailability of satellite images.

Figure 1A–C. Study area. A. The Cerrado Domain and Jalapão region, Tocantins state, Brazil. B. Jalapão State Park (JSP) and Jalapão Environmental Protection Area (JEPA). The yellow square is shown in detail in C. C. Satellite image of the four campo sujo study sites spread over 64 km2. Sites 1, 2 and 3 are burned every other year, and site 4 has remained unburned for at least 10 years. Source: Coordenação de Mosaicos e Corredores Ecológicos/DIREP/ICMBio.

The four sites are at similar altitudes (ca. 520 m asl) and have similar temperature and precipitation conditions. Also, the vegetation structure and soil characteristics are similar among them (Santos et al. Reference Santos, Crema, Szmuchrowski, Asano and Kawaguchi2011). We quantified organic matter and texture at the soil surface (0–5 cm) through five randomly collected soil samples at each site. The granulometric analyses followed the Boyocus dosimeter method (Camargo et al. Reference Camargo, Moniz, Jorge and Valadares1986). The organic matter was estimated by oxidation with sodium dichromate in H2SO4 and quantified by colorimetry (Raij et al. Reference Raij, Quaggio, Cantarella, Ferreira, Lopes and Bataglia1987). There is no history of human impact in the area, and native herbivorous animals are rare, represented mainly by the pampas deer (Ozotocerus benzoarticus), a species threatened with extinction (Chiarello et al. Reference Chiarello, Aguiar, Cerqueira, Melo, Rodrigues, Silva, Machado, Drummond and Paglia2008).

Focal species

In this study, we only considered herbs and subshrubs species. We adapted plant habit definitions from Beentje (Reference Beentje2012), in which herbs are plants without a persistent woody stem above ground, and subshrubs are small shrubs with herbaceous stems except at the base, which is woody.

In a recent survey in the area (Antar & Sano Reference Antar and Sano2019), the most species-rich families found, regardless of habit, were Leguminosae, Poaceae, Asteraceae, Lamiaceae, Rubiaceae, Myrtaceae, Malpighiaceae and Euphorbiaceae, that agrees overall with the most species-rich families in the Cerrado Domain (Eiten Reference Eiten1972, Gottsberger & Silberbauer-Gottsberger Reference Gottsberger and Silberbauer-Gottsberger2006, Ratter et al. Reference Ratter, Ribeiro and Bridgewater1997).

Experimental design and sampling of the herb–subshrub layer

To quantify the different descriptors of plant diversity, we randomly placed 15 plots of 4 m² at each site, totalling 60 plots across sites (Figure 2A-B). The plot randomisation in each site was made by raffling the direction (North, South, East and West) and the number of steps (1–60) taken, starting from the site edge. We sampled all the herb and subshrub individuals whose base was within the plot. Individuals were defined as ramets for subshrubs, and tussocks for grass-like plants due to the clonal habit of some plants, a common feature of herbaceous species in the Cerrado. The specimens collected were morphotyped and identified to the species level by comparing them with nearby reproductive specimens and vouchers in the herbarium of the University of São Paulo (SPF). We followed Antar & Sano (Reference Antar and Sano2019) to guide species identification, and taxonomists were consulted to confirm the identification of doubtful species. Family classification followed APG IV (2016), and species names followed Flora do Brasil 2020 (Flora do Brasil 2020). Field data were collected in the rainy season, from the end of October 2013 to March 2014.

Figure 2A-F. General aspects of the study sites and common herb–subshrub species. A. General view of the 10-year unburned site (site 4). B. General view of a 2-year burned site (site 1). C, D, E and F. Inflorescence of Trachypogon spicatus (L.f.) Kuntze (C), Syagrus glazioviana (Dammer) Becc. (D), Croton agoensis Baill. (E) and Bulbostylis junciformis (Kunth) C.B.Clarke (F).

Statistical analyses

Species accumulation curves were made to infer the sampling sufficiency of each site, and we used the non-parametric species-rich Jackknife estimator (Palmer, Reference Palmer1991) to assess the ‘true’ species richness for each site.

Plant density and species richness of the herb–subshrub layer were estimated for each plot. We used the Fisher’s alpha index to describe the plot plant diversity, since this index accounts for the number of individuals and species (Fisher et al. Reference Fisher, Corbet and Williams1943). To test for differences in the plant density, species richness and diversity index among sites, we applied general linear models with the Gaussian probabilistic distribution having sites as an explanatory variable, followed by a post hoc Tukey’s test (α = 0.008 under the Bonferroni correction). Finally, we used the Shapiro–Wilk test and Levene’s test to assess data normality and homogeneity of variances for the three variables (Legendre & Legendre, Reference Legendre and Legendre1998).

The species composition of the herb–subshrub layer was reduced to two dimensions with non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS). Two distinct ordinations were carried out with the plant species composition data: (i) species abundance data (quantitative ordination) and (ii) species occurrence data (qualitative ordination), defined by presence or absence in each plot. For the quantitative ordination, we used the Bray–Curtis distance measure on plot-standardised data (the data for each species were standardised by the plot to the proportions of the total number of individuals). In the qualitative ordination, we used the Sorensen index (Legendre & Legendre, Reference Legendre and Legendre1998). The ordination using species occurrence data captures the rarer species patterns. In contrast, patterns evaluated with abundance data tend to be more related to the most abundant species in the dataset (Zuquim et al. Reference Zuquim, Costa, Prado and Braga-Neto2009). The statistical significance of each axis of NMDS was based on 1000 Monte Carlo permutations. The first two axes of NMDS were used as dependent variables in inferential tests, given that these two axes captured most of the variation related to species composition (60% for quantitative ordination and 28% for qualitative ordination) and the complete absence of correlation between the two NMDS axes (r = 8.4e-17 and r = 2.4e-16). The adjusted r2 of the dissimilarity matrices of original data regressed against the dissimilarity along the one- and two-dimensional ordination was used to evaluate the adequacy of the ordinations (McCune & Grace, Reference McCune and Grace2002). To test for differences in the two NMDS axes among sites, we carried out two variance analyses (one-way ANOVA), followed by a post hoc Tukey’s test, examining each response variable (NMDS axes) separately. We performed all statistical analyses in R software (R CORE TEAM 2020), using the base and the vegan (Oksanen et al. Reference Oksanen, Blanchet, Kindt, Legendre, Minchin, O’Hara, Simpson, Solymos, Henry, Stevens and Wagner2015) packages.

Results

Species collected and soil variables

A total of 5,249 individuals belonging to 68 species and 15 families were collected at the 4 sites (Table S1). The most representative families in number of individuals were Poaceae, Cyperaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Arecaceae and Leguminosae. The most representative families in number of species were Poaceae (17), Leguminosae (7), Cyperaceae (6), Amaranthaceae (3) and Polygalaceae (3). The most common species were Trachypogon spicatus (L.f) Kuntze with 918 individuals found in all plots, Bulbostylis junciformis (Kunth) C.B.Clarke, Croton agoensis Baill. and Syagrus glaziouviana (Dammer) Becc. (Figure 2C-F). The species accumulation curves indicate that sampling sufficiency was reached in the four sites (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Species accumulation curve for each study site (A = site 1; B = site 2; C = site 3; D = site 4), 95% confidence intervals (dashed lines). Observed and estimated (Jackknife estimator) richness are indicated for each study site.

Soil analyses showed a very similar texture in the four sites, being very sandy and poor in organic matter (Table S2).

Plant density, richness and diversity

On average, plant density in the herb–subshrub layer was different among sites (F3,56 = 24.5; p<0.001), with site 4 (unburned) being at least 50% less dense than sites 1, 2 and 3 (‘frequently burned’) (Figure 4A). Species richness was similar at sites 1, 2 and 3, but site 4 had, on average, 50% fewer species than the three frequently burned sites 1, 2 and 3 (F3,56 = 19.5; p<0.001) (Figure 4B). A very similar pattern was found for diversity (Figure 4D), with site 4 being up to 1.4 times less diverse than the other frequently burned sites 1, 2 and 3 (F3,56 = 12.17; p<0.0001; Figure 4D). Of the three richest families, Poaceae, Leguminosae and Cyperaceae showed distinct richness at the sites (Poaceae – F3,56 = 29.02; p<0.0001; Leguminosae – F3,56 = 1.02; p = 0.38; Cyperaceae – F3,56 = 14.26; p<0.0001; Figure 4C).

Figure 4. A–C. Variation of the plant density, species richness and diversity index among sites. A. Plant density (number of individuals per plot). B. Species richness (number of species per plot). C. Species richness of the three richest botanical families: Poaceae, Leguminosae and Cyperaceae (number of species per plot). D. Diversity index. Different letters indicate differences among sites based on the post hoc Tukey’s HSD multiple comparison test (p < 0.05).

Species composition across sites

The NMDS ordinations recall a large variation of the species composition of the herb–subshrub layer (Figure 5). In the quantitative ordination using species abundance data, the first and second NMDS axes captured 48% and 12% of the composition variation, respectively (Figure 5A). Thus, considering the first and second NMDS axes of the quantitative ordination, the species composition is not homogeneous across sites (first axis: F3,56 = 22.8, p < 0.001 and the second axis: F3,56 = 16.78, p < 0.001). In the first axis, sites 1, 2 and 4 were similar, but they differed from site 3 (Figure 5B). In the second axis, sites 1, 2 and 3 were similar but different from site 4 (Figure 5C), indicating a different species composition of the unburned site 4 compared to the frequently burned sites 1, 2 and 3. The results of the first and second axes of the qualitative ordination were similar to those of the quantitative ordination (Figure S3).

Figure 5. A–C. Variation of the herb–subshrub species composition across the 60 plots distributed at the 4 campo sujo sites in the Jalapão region (Tocantins state, Brazil). A. The first two axes of non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS, r2adj = 0.60). B and C. Changes in the herb–subshrub species composition represented by the first two axes of the NMDS of abundance data. Different letters indicate differences among sites based on Tukey’s HSD multiple comparison post hoc test (p < 0.05).

Discussion

We found that the herb–subshrub layer’s plant density, species richness, diversity index and species composition vary among the sampled sites in the Jalapão region. Water availability, soil depth and nutrient availability, topography (e.g., slope), species interactions, grazing, and fire frequency are important factors determining the structure and diversity of the Cerrado Domain (Coutinho, Reference Coutinho1990, Pivello & Coutinho Reference Pivello and Coutinho1996, Ratter et al. Reference Ratter, Ribeiro and Bridgewater1997, Moreira Reference Moreira2000, Ribeiro & Walter Reference Ribeiro, Walter, Sano, Almeida and Ribeiro2008, Silva & Batalha Reference Silva and Batalha2011, Amaral et al. Reference Amaral, Munhoz, Eugênio and Felfili2013). In our study area, only fire frequency varied strongly across the sampled sites since they are close together, sharing the same local climate, topography, soil features and animal grazing patterns. We thus hypothesise that fire plays an essential role in explaining the variation of the herb–subshrub layer diversity and species composition in the study region. Indeed, the differences among the sites sampled matched the predictions according to the fire pattern in the Cerrado. The unburned site 4 had lower density, richness and diversity than the three frequently burned sites (1, 2 and 3). Also, the species composition of the unburned site differed from the other three sites.

We found a lower number of species (68 species) in the herb–subshrub layer of the Jalapão region compared to other similar studies in Neotropical savannas (César Reference César1980, Loiola et al. Reference Loiola, Cianciaruso, Silva and Batalha2010, Amaral et al. Reference Amaral, Munhoz, Eugênio and Felfili2013, Santos Reference Santos2019), with around 30% fewer species (Loiola et al. Reference Loiola, Cianciaruso, Silva and Batalha2010). Biological reasons or differences in sampling methods can explain this, and the second may be more relevant here. In particular, we considered only herbs and subshrubs in our sampling protocol, while other studies included plants with other habits, such as small shrubs and climbers. Regarding the most frequent plant groups, the families Poaceae, Cyperaceae and Leguminosae have also been the most representative herb–subshrub plants in other campo sujo floras (Munhoz Reference Munhoz2003, Ribeiro & Walter Reference Ribeiro, Walter, Sano, Almeida and Ribeiro2008, Santos Reference Santos2019). Corroborating this pattern, these families showed the highest species richness and number of individuals in our plots. They are also very common in other Cerrado regions (Gottsberger & Silberbauer-Gottsberger Reference Gottsberger and Silberbauer-Gottsberger2006), including other portions of the Jalapão region (Antar & Sano Reference Antar and Sano2019).

Plant density and richness per plot were higher in the sites under the biennial fire regime than in the unburned site, coinciding with other areas with similar physiognomy in the Cerrado Domain (e.g., César Reference César1980). This pattern can be explained by the role of fire in triggering herb and subshrub species vegetative reproduction (Coutinho Reference Coutinho1990), which has also been documented in other savannas worldwide (Sarmiento Reference Sarmiento1984, Canales et al. Reference Canales, Trevisan, Silva and Caswell1994). Also, fire occurrence increases the light incidence and water availability, as well as nutrient availability for herbaceous plants with shallow roots (Coutinho Reference Coutinho1990, Pivello & Coutinho Reference Pivello and Coutinho1992), reducing above- and below-ground competition (César Reference César1980, Abreu et al. Reference Abreu, Hoffmann, Vasconcelos, Pilon, Rossatto and Durigan2017). Furthermore, we showed that among the three richest families, only Poaceae richness differed between burned and unburned sites, having both abundant (Axonopus marginatus, Poaceae) and rare species (Paspalum marmoratum, Poaceae) exclusive to sites under the biennial fire regime (Supplementary material Table S1). These results corroborate the evidence that, considering the most abundant and rarest species, the exclusion of fire in cerrado ralo can reduce the diversity and co-occurrence of herb–subshrub layer species compared to areas that are biennially burned (Santos Reference Santos2019).

In our study, Poaceae species represented the most successful group under frequent fires, clearly more abundant and diverse under such conditions. Thus, the pattern of species composition change across sites in both NMDS ordination axes is mainly impacted by differences in the distribution of Poaceae species. However, some studies have shown different patterns of herbaceous species diversity in fire-suppressed areas. For example, in an area free of fire for 7 years, the floristic composition changed by increasing species richness in wet and dry shrubby grassland (Amaral et al. Reference Amaral, Munhoz, Eugênio and Felfili2013). Also, the Poaceae family in areas frequently burned had less species with a more homogeneous distribution than in unburned areas (Miranda Reference Miranda2002). There is no simple explanation for these contrasting results, but the availability of species (and propagules) at the landscape scale may explain local changes after fire suppression. More correlational studies covering a more comprehensive range of localities and landscape contexts and experimental studies are desired to understand better the role of fire in plant diversity patterns of the Cerrado herb–subshrub layer.

Although the density of herbs and subshrubs was lower in the site under fire suppression for at least 10 years (site 4), there was not much bare soil, as the ground was covered by woody shrub individuals, mostly less than 0.5 m tall. Therefore, it is possible that site 4, although still classified as campo sujo, is a transitional state with a greater proportion of shrubs towards a more woody vegetation type. This transition to more woody vegetation with fire exclusion has also been reported in other studies in the Cerrado Domain (Coutinho Reference Coutinho1990; Moreira Reference Moreira2000, Miranda et al. Reference Miranda, Neto, Neves and Miranda2010, Amaral et al. Reference Amaral, Munhoz, Eugênio and Felfili2013; Abreu et al. Reference Abreu, Hoffmann, Vasconcelos, Pilon, Rossatto and Durigan2017). Despite the soil in the Jalapão region being very sandy and, consequently, with a low proportion of nutrients and organic matter for plants, the open vegetation structure and diversity dominated by the herb–subshrub component (Schimidt et al. Reference Schmidt, Figueiredo and Scariot2007; Antar & Sano Reference Antar and Sano2019) are probably maintained by the effects of high fire frequency (Rodrigues et al. Reference Rodrigues, Zirondi and Fidelis2021). Indeed, 2 years after the last burn, sites 1, 2 and 3 visually showed a complete recovery of the herbaceous vegetation, allowing them to be richer in species composition than the unburned site. This pattern corroborates other studies, which have reported around 8 months (Pilon et al. Reference Pilon, Cava, Hoffmann, Abreu, Fidelis and Durigan2020) to 18 months (Batmanian & Haridasan Reference Batmanian and Haridasan1985) for a total recovery of the herbaceous vegetation after fire.

The Jalapão region and its vast biological diversity are currently being threatened by the advance of mechanised agriculture expansion, which has been stimulated by the Brazilian government (Borges & Antar, Reference Borges and Antar2016, Antar et al. Reference Antar, Santos and Sano2017, Silva et al. Reference Silva, Amaral, Bijos and Munhos2018, Antar & Sano Reference Antar and Sano2019, Barbosa-Silva & Antar Reference Barbosa-Silva and Antar2020). Therefore, studies focused on the biodiversity of the Jalapão region can support proposals for well-grounded conservation strategies (Mace Reference Mace2004), including fire management in areas where burning is widespread (Pereira Jr. et al. Reference Pereira-Júnior, Oliveira, Pereira and Turkman2014, Schmidt et al. Reference Schmidt, Moura, Ferreira, Eloy, Sampaio, Dias and Berlinck2018). Unlike forest ecosystems, in which fire is mainly harmful, fire can benefit the dynamics of savannas (Bond & Keeley, Reference Bond and Keeley2005; Pivello et al. Reference Pivello, Vieira, Christianini, Ribeiro, da Silva Menezes, Berlinck, Melo, Marengo, Tornquist, Tomas and Overbeck2021), but this issue is still poorly understood by society and environmental agencies in Brazil. Research studies on Cerrado fire dynamics over the last five decades (Coutinho Reference Coutinho, Huntley and Walker1982, Reference Coutinho1990, Pivello & Norton Reference Pivello and Norton1996, Pivello & Coutinho Reference Pivello and Coutinho1996, Miranda et al. Reference Miranda, Bustamante, Miranda, Oliveira and Marquis2002, Miranda Reference Miranda2010, Fidelis et al. Reference Fidelis, Alvarado, Barradas and Pivello2018) as well as practical knowledge coming from protected area managers (Borges et al. Reference Borges, Eloy, Schmidt, Barradas and Santos2016, Berlinck & Batista Reference Berlinck and Batista2020, Berlinck & Lima Reference Berlinck and Lima2021) have contributed to slowly change the zero-fire policy rooted in the country for centuries (Durigan & Ratter Reference Durigan and Ratter2016, Pivello et al. Reference Pivello, Vieira, Christianini, Ribeiro, da Silva Menezes, Berlinck, Melo, Marengo, Tornquist, Tomas and Overbeck2021) towards prescribed and controlled fires, and integrated fire management. Recent environmental legislation has incorporated these new approaches by accepting controlled fires in specific situations (Schmidt et al. Reference Schmidt, Moura, Ferreira, Eloy, Sampaio, Dias and Berlinck2018; Pivello et al. Reference Pivello, Vieira, Christianini, Ribeiro, da Silva Menezes, Berlinck, Melo, Marengo, Tornquist, Tomas and Overbeck2021 ). It has been more and more accepted that prescribed, controlled fires are needed in fire-prone vegetation to avoid biomass accumulation and large and high-intensity fires, which are harmful to flora and fauna (Ramos-Neto & Pivello, Reference Ramos-Neto and Pivello2000, Santos et al. Reference Santos, Nogueira, Souza, Falleiro, Scmidt and Libonati2021). Corroborating previous studies (Coutinho, Reference Coutinho, Huntley and Walker1982; Reference Coutinho1990; Pivello & Coutinho, Reference Pivello and Coutinho1996; Miranda et al. Reference Miranda, Bustamante, Miranda, Oliveira and Marquis2002; Miranda, Reference Miranda2010; Fidelis et al. Reference Fidelis, Alvarado, Barradas and Pivello2018), this research shows that adequate fire management to maintain the Cerrado open physiognomies and herbaceous biodiversity should include controlled fires under specific regimes to form a mosaic of burned and unburned sites in protected areas (Ramos-Neto & Pivello, Reference Ramos-Neto and Pivello2000).

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467422000232

Acknowledgements

We thank Naturatins for providing a collection permit and field work support at ‘Parque Estadual do Jalapão’; Ubiratan Chagas, Lucas Nascimento, Marcela Escaramai, Heloisa Hortêncio Antar, Vera Scatena, Rebeca Viana and Márcio Martins for helping during field work; Scott V. Heald, for the English revision of the text; Alexandre B. Sampaio and Isabel B. Schmidt for helping with references and information about the Jalapão region. This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001; GMA thanks FAPESP (2014/01851-7) and Idea Wild for financial support; PTS thanks CNPq (Proc. 310331/2019-6) and FAPESP (Proc. 2016/05843-4); VRP thanks CNPq (Proc, 303970/2018-9). Additional funds were provided to A.N. by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq; grant number 434692/2018-2) and by the São Paulo Research Foundation through a Young Investigators Grant (FAPESP; grant number 2019/19544-7).

Competing interests

The author(s) declare none.

References

Abreu, RCR, Hoffmann, WA, Vasconcelos, HL, Pilon, NA, Rossatto, DR and Durigan, G (2017) The biodiversity cost of carbon sequestration in tropical savanna. Science Advances 3, e1701284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alvares, CA, Stape, JL, Sentelhas, PC, Gonçalves, JLM and Sparovek, G (2014) Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meterologische Zeitschrift 22, 711728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amaral, AG, Munhoz, CBR, Eugênio, CUO, Felfili, JM (2013) Vascular flora in dry-shrub and wet grassland Cerrado seven years after a fire, Federal District, Brazil. Check List 9, 387503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amaral, AG, Munhoz, CBR, Walter, BMT, Aguirre-Gutierrez, J and Raes, N (2017) Richness pattern and phytogeography of the Cerrado herb–shrub flora and implications for conservation. Journal of Vegetation Science 28, 848858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antar, GM and Sano, PT (2019) Angiosperms of dry grasslands and savannas of Jalapão, the largest conserved Cerrado area in Brazil. Rodriguésia 70, e04002017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antar, GM, Santos, MF and Sano, PT (2017) Rediscovery and taxonomic reassessment of four angiosperms in the savannas of Jalapão, Central Brazil. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 75, 5571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
APG IV (2016) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Botanical Journal of Linnean Society 181, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araújo, D, Antar, GM and Lombardi, JA (2016). Dioscorea compacta (Dioscoreaceae), a new endangered dwarf species from the Jalapão region, Tocantins, Brazil. Kew Bulletin 71, 2732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbosa-Silva, R and Antar, GM (2020) Description vs deforestation: Couepia brevistaminea (Chrysobalanaceae) a new species on the frontier of deforestation in the Brazilian savanna. Phytotaxa 471, 3846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batmanian, GJ and Haridasan, M (1985) Primary production and accumulation of nutrients by the ground layer community of cerrado vegetation of central Brazil. Plant and Soil 88, 437440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beentje, H (2012) The Kew Plant Glossary: An Illustrated Dictionary of Plant Terms. United Kingdom: Royal Botanical Garden, Kew, 164 pp.Google Scholar
Berlinck, CN and Batista, EKL (2020) Good fire, bad fire: it depends on who burns. Flora 268, 151610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlinck, CN and Lima, LHA (2021) Implementation of integrated fire management in Brazilian federal protected areas: results and perspectives. Biodiversidade Brasileira 11, 111.Google Scholar
BFG - The Brazil Flora Group (2015) Growing knowledge: an overview of Seed Plant diversity in Brazil. Rodriguésia 66, 10851113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, WJ and Keeley, JE (2005) Fire as a global ‘herbivore’: the ecology and evolution of flammable ecosystems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20, 387394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borges, LM and Antar, GM (2016). Four they are! Broadening the description of Mimosa flabelifolia (Leguminosae Mimosoideae), a rare species from the Brazilian Cerrado. Phytotaxa, 243, 155162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borges, SL, Eloy, L, Schmidt, IB, Barradas, ACS and Santos, IAD (2016) Fire Management in veredas (palm swamps): new perspectives on traditional farming systems in Jalapão, Brazil. Ambiente & Sociedade 19, 269294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Câmara, PE and Leite, RN (2005) Bryophytes from Jalapão, state of Tocantins, northern Brazil. Tropical Bryology 26, 2329.Google Scholar
Camargo, OA, Moniz, AC, Jorge, JA and Valadares, JMAS (1986). Métodos de análise química e física de solos do Instituto Agronômico do Estado de São Paulo. Boletim Técnico 106, 194.Google Scholar
Canales, J, Trevisan, MC, Silva, JF and Caswell, H (1994) A demographic study of an annual grass (Andropogon brevifolius Schwrz) in burnt and unburnt savanna. Acta Oecologica 15, 261273.Google Scholar
César, HL (1980) Efeitos da queima e corte sobre a vegetação de campo sujo na Fazenda Água Limpa, Brasília-DF. Brasília. Master Thesis. Universidade de Brasília – Ecology Department.Google Scholar
Chiarello, AG, Aguiar, LMS, Cerqueira, R, Melo, FR, Rodrigues, FHG and Silva, VMF (2008) Mamíferos Ameaçados de Extinção no Brasil. In Machado, ABM, Drummond, GM and Paglia, AP (eds.), Livro Vermelho da Fauna Brasileira Ameaçada de Extinção. 1st ed. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Biodiversitas, pp. 681874.Google Scholar
Coutinho, LM (1976) Contribuição ao conhecimento do papel ecológico das queimadas na floração de espécies do cerrado. Tese de livre docência, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
Coutinho, LM (1982) Ecological effects of fire in Brazilian Cerrado. In Huntley, BJ and Walker, BH (eds.), Ecology of tropical savannas. Germany: Springer Verlag, pp. 273291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coutinho, LM (1990) Fire in the ecology of Brazilian Cerrado. Ecological Studies: Analysis and Synthesis 84, 82105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devecchi, MF and Pirani, JR (2015) A new species of Simaba sect. Grandiflorae (Simaroubaceae) from Jalapão region, Tocantins, Brazil. Phytotaxa 227, 167174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dias, BFS and Miranda, HS (2010) O projeto fogo. In Miranda, HS (ed.), Efeitos do regime do fogo sobre a comunidade de cerrado: Resultados do Projeto Fogo. Brasília: Ibama-MMA, pp. 1522.Google Scholar
Durigan, G, Pilon, N, Assis, GB and Souza, FM (2018) Plantas pequenas do cerrado: biodiversidade negligenciada/. São Paulo: Secretaria do Meio Ambiente do Estado de São Paulo.Google Scholar
Durigan, G and Ratter, JA (2016) The need for a consistent fire policy for Cerrado conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology 53, 1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eiten, G (1972) The cerrado vegetation of Brazil. Botanical Review 38, 201341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eloy, L, Schmidt, IB, Borges, SL, Ferreira, MC and Santos, TA (2018). Seasonal fire management by traditional cattle ranchers prevents the spread of wildfire in the Brazilian Cerrado. Ambio 48, 890899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fidelis, A, Alvarado, ST, Barradas, ACS and Pivello, VR (2018). The year 2017: megafires and management in the Cerrado. Fire 1, 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fidelis, A and Zirondi, HL (2021) And after fire, the Cerrado flowers: a review of post-fire flowering in a tropical savanna. Flora 280, 151849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, RA, Corbet, AS and Williams, CB (1943) The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. Journal of Animal Ecology 12, 4258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flora do Brasil 2020 (2020) Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. Available at: <http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br/>. Accessed on: 01 October 2021..+Accessed+on:+01+October+2021.>Google Scholar
Forzza, RC, Baumgratz, JFA, Bicudo, CEM, Canhos, DAL, Carvalho, A, Coelho, MAN, Costa, AF, Costa, DP, Hopkins, MG, Leitman, PM, Lohmann, LG, Lughadha, EN, Maia, LC, Martinelli, G, Menezes, M, Morim, MP, Peixoto, AL, Pirani, JR, Prado, J, Queiroz, LP, Souza, S, Souza, VC, Stehmann, JR, Sylvestre, LS, Walter, BMT and Zappi, DC (2012) New Brazilian floristic list highlights conservation challenges. Bioscience 62, 3945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, RVS, Cardoso, JCF, Oliveira, PE and Oliveira, DC (2021) Changes in the Cerrado vegetation structure: insights from more than three decades of ecological succession. Web Ecology 21, 5564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottsberger, G and Silberbauer-Gottsberger, I (2006) Life in the Cerrado, a South American Tropical Seasonal Ecosystem. Volume 1. Origin, Structure, Dynamics and Plant Use. Germany: Reta Verlag, 277 p.Google Scholar
Henriques, RPB (2005). Influência da história, solo e fogo na distribuição e dinâmica das fitofisionomias no bioma do Cerrado. In Souza-Silva, JC and Felfili, JM (eds), Cerrado: Ecologia, Biodiversidade e Conservação. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília, pp. 7392.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, WA (1999). Fire and population dynamics of woody plants in a neotropical savanna: matrix model projections. Ecology 80, 13541369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legendre, P and Legendre, L (1998) Numerical ecology. 2nd English Edition, Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Loiola, PP, Cianciaruso, MV, Silva, IA and Batalha, MA (2010) Functional diversity of herbaceous species under different fire frequencies in Brazilian savannas. Flora 205, 674681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mace, GM (2004) The role of taxonomy in species conservation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 359, 711719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mariano, V, Rebolo, IF and Christianini, AV (2019). Fire-sensitive species dominate seed rain after fire suppression: implications for plant community diversity and woody encroachment in the Cerrado. Biotropica 51, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCune, B and Grace, JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. Gleneden Beach, Oregon: MjM Software Design.Google Scholar
Miranda, HS (2010) Efeitos do regime de fogo sobre a estrutura de comunidades de Cerrado: Projeto Fogo. Brasília: IBAMA.Google Scholar
Miranda, HS, Bustamante, MMC and Miranda, AC (2002) The fire factor. In Oliveira, PS and Marquis, RJ (eds), The Cerrados of Brazil: ecology and natural history of a neotropical savanna. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 5168.Google Scholar
Miranda, HS, Neto, WN and Neves, BMC (2010) Caracterização das queimadas de Cerrado. In Miranda, HS (ed.). Efeitos do regime do fogo sobre a comunidade de cerrado: Resultados do Projeto Fogo. Brasília: Ibama-MMA, pp. 2333.Google Scholar
Miranda, MI (2002) Efeito de diferentes regimes de queima sobre a comunidade de gramíneas de Cerrado. Master Thesis. Universidade Nacional de Brasília, Bazil.Google Scholar
Montenegro, SR (2019). Efeitos do manejo do fogo na estrutura de comunidades lenhosas em formações savânicas do Cerrado. Master Thesis. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade de Brasília, Brazil.Google Scholar
Moreira, AG (2000). Effects of fire protection on savanna structure in Central Brazil. Journal of Biogeography 27, 10211029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreira, ALC, Antar, GM, Simão-Bianchini, R and Cavalcanti, TB (2017). Contribution to the knowledge of Bonamia (Convolvulaceae) in Brazil: a new species and a new occurrence. Phytotaxa 306, 146152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munhoz, CBR (2003) Padrões de distribuição sazonal e espacial das espécies do estrato herbáceo-subarbustivo em comunidades de campo limpo úmido e de campo sujo. Ph.D. Thesis. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade de Brasília, Brazil.Google Scholar
Oksanen, JF, Blanchet, G, Kindt, R, Legendre, P, Minchin, PR, O’Hara, RB, Simpson, GL, Solymos, P, Henry, M, Stevens, H and Wagner, H (2015) Vegam: Community Ecology Package. R package version – 2.2.-1. http://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=vegan Google Scholar
Palmer, MW (1991) Estimating species richness: the second-order Jackknife reconsidered. Ecology 72: 15121513. doi: 10.2307/1941127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastore, JFB and Antar, GM (2021). Two new endangered species of Polygala series Trichospermae (Polygalaceae), endemic to the Cerrado Domain, Tocantins State, Brazil. European Journal of Taxonomy 762, 133148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira-Júnior, AC, Oliveira, SLJ, Pereira, JMC, Turkman, MAA (2014) Modelling fire frequency in a Cerrado Savanna protected area. Plos One 9, e102380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilon, NA, Cava, MGB, Hoffmann, WA, Abreu, RCR, Fidelis, A and Durigan, G (2020) The diversity of post-fire regeneration strategies in the cerrado ground layer. Journal of Ecology 109, 154166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pivello, VR (2011). The use of fire in the Cerrado and Amazonian rainforests of Brazil: past and present. Fire Ecology 7, 2439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pivello, VR and Coutinho, LM (1992). Transfer of macro-nutrients to the atmosphere during experimental burnings in an open cerrado (Brazilian savanna). Journal of Tropical Ecology 8, 487497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pivello, VR and Coutinho, LM (1996) A qualitative successional model to assist in the management of Brazilian cerrados. Forest Ecology Management 87, 127138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pivello, VR and Norton, GA (1996) Firetool: an expert system for the use of prescribed fires in Brazilian savannas. Journal of Applied Ecology 33, 348356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pivello, VR, Vieira, I, Christianini, AV, Ribeiro, DB, da Silva Menezes, L, Berlinck, CN, Melo, FP, Marengo, JA, Tornquist, CG, Tomas, WM and Overbeck, GE (2021). Understanding Brazil’s catastrophic fires: causes, consequences and policy needed to prevent future tragedies. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation 19, 233255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proença, CEB, Farias-Singer, R and Gomes, BM (2007) Pleonotoma orientalis (Bignoniaceae-Bignonieae): expanded description, distribution and a new variety of a poorly known species. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 64, 1723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raij, BV, Quaggio, JA, Cantarella, H, Ferreira, ME, Lopes, AS and Bataglia, OC (1987). Análise química de solos para fins de fertilidade. Campinas: Fundação Cargill.Google Scholar
Ramos-Neto, MB and Pivello, VR (2000) Lightning fires in a Brazilian Savanna national park: rethinking management strategies. Environmental Management 26, 675684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratter, JA, Ribeiro, JF and Bridgewater, S (1997) The Brazilian Cerrado vegetation and threats to its biodiversity. Annals of Biology 80, 223230.Google Scholar
R CORE TEAM (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, URL http://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, JF and Walter, BMT (2008) As principais fitofisionomias do bioma Cerrado. In Sano, SM, Almeida, SP and Ribeiro, JF (eds.), Cerrado: Ecologia e flora. EMBRAPA. Vol. 1, pp. 153212.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, CA, Zirondi, HL and Fidelis, A (2021) Fire frequency affects fire behavior in open savannas of the Cerrado. Forest Ecology and Management 482, 118850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, AC (2019). Efeitos de diferentes regimes de queima sobre o estrato herbáceo-subarbustivo da vegetação em áreas de Manejo Integrado do Fogo no Cerrado. Master Thesis. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade de Brasília, Brazil.Google Scholar
Santos, FLM, Nogueira, J, Souza, RAF, Falleiro, RM, Scmidt, IB and Libonati, R (2021) Prescribed burning reduces large, high-intensity wildfires and emissions in the Brazilian Savanna. Fire 4, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, RP, Crema, A, Szmuchrowski, MA, Asano, K and Kawaguchi, M (2011). Atlas do corredor ecológico da região do Jalapão. Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade.Google Scholar
Sarmiento, G (1984) The ecology of neotropical savannas. Cambridge: Harvard University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, MN, Miranda, HS and Maia, JMF (2010) O fogo e o estrato arbóreo do Cerrado: efeitos imediatos e de longo prazo. In Miranda, HS, Efeitos do regime do fogo sobre a comunidade de cerrado: Resultados do Projeto Fogo. Brasília: Ibama–MMA, pp. 7791.Google Scholar
Schmidt, IB, Fidelis, A, Miranda, HS and Ticktin, T (2017) How do the wets burn? Fire behavior and intensity in wet grasslands in the Brazilian savanna. Revista Brasileira de Botanica 40, 167175.Google Scholar
Schmidt, IB, Figueiredo, IB and Scariot, A (2007) Ethnobotany and effects of harvesting on the population of Syngonanthus nitens (Bong.) Ruhland (Eriocaulaceae), a NTFP from Jalapão region, Central Brazil. Economic Botany 61, 7385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, IB, Moura, LC, Ferreira, MC, Eloy, L, Sampaio, AB, Dias, PA and Berlinck, CN (2018) Fire management in the Brazilian savanna: first steps and the way forward. Journal of Applied Ecology 55, 20942101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SEPLAN – Secretaria do Planejamento e Meio Ambiente do Estado do Tocantins (2003a) Plano de Manejo do Parque Estadual do Jalapão. Palmas: Seplan.Google Scholar
SEPLAN – Secretaria do Planejamento e Meio Ambiente do Estado de Tocantins (2003b) Plano de Manejo da Área de Proteção Ambiental do Jalapão. Palmas: Seplan.Google Scholar
SEPLAN – Secretaria do Planejamento e Meio Ambiente do Estado de Tocantins (2012) Atlas do Tocantins: Subsídios ao Planejamento da Gestão Territorial. Palmas: Seplan.Google Scholar
Silva, DM and Batalha, MA (2011) Defense syndromes against herbivory in a cerrado plant community. Plant Ecology 212, 181193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, DP, Amaral, AG, Bijos, NR and Munhos, CBR (2018) Is the herb-shrub composition of veredas (Brazilian palm swamps) distinguishable? Acta Botanica Brasilica 32, 4754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, JMC and Bates, JM (2002) Biogeographic patterns and conservation in the South America Cerrado: a tropical Savana Hotspot. BioScience 52, 225233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, MF, Grether, R, Queiroz, LP, Skema, C, Pennington, RT and Hughes, CE (2009) Recent assembly of the cerrado, a neotropical plant diversity hotspot, by in situ evolution of adaptations to fire. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 10, 2035920364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, N, Lehmann, C, Murphy, BP and Durigan, G (2017) Savanna woody encroachment is widespread across three continents. Global Change Biology 23, 235244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strassburg, BBN, Brooks, T, Feltran-Barbieri, R, Iribarrem, A, Crouzeilles, R, Loyola, R, Latawiec, AE, Oliveira Filho, FJB., Scaramuzza, CAM, Scarano, FR, Soares-Filho, B and Balmford, A (2017) Moment of truth for the Cerrado hotspot. Nature Ecology & Evolution 1, 0099.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuquim, G, Costa, FR, Prado, J and Braga-Neto, R (2009) Distribution of pteridophyte communities along environmental gradients in Central Amazonia, Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation 18, 151166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1A–C. Study area. A. The Cerrado Domain and Jalapão region, Tocantins state, Brazil. B. Jalapão State Park (JSP) and Jalapão Environmental Protection Area (JEPA). The yellow square is shown in detail in C. C. Satellite image of the four campo sujo study sites spread over 64 km2. Sites 1, 2 and 3 are burned every other year, and site 4 has remained unburned for at least 10 years. Source: Coordenação de Mosaicos e Corredores Ecológicos/DIREP/ICMBio.

Figure 1

Figure 2A-F. General aspects of the study sites and common herb–subshrub species. A. General view of the 10-year unburned site (site 4). B. General view of a 2-year burned site (site 1). C, D, E and F. Inflorescence of Trachypogon spicatus (L.f.) Kuntze (C), Syagrus glazioviana (Dammer) Becc. (D), Croton agoensis Baill. (E) and Bulbostylis junciformis (Kunth) C.B.Clarke (F).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Species accumulation curve for each study site (A = site 1; B = site 2; C = site 3; D = site 4), 95% confidence intervals (dashed lines). Observed and estimated (Jackknife estimator) richness are indicated for each study site.

Figure 3

Figure 4. A–C. Variation of the plant density, species richness and diversity index among sites. A. Plant density (number of individuals per plot). B. Species richness (number of species per plot). C. Species richness of the three richest botanical families: Poaceae, Leguminosae and Cyperaceae (number of species per plot). D. Diversity index. Different letters indicate differences among sites based on the post hoc Tukey’s HSD multiple comparison test (p < 0.05).

Figure 4

Figure 5. A–C. Variation of the herb–subshrub species composition across the 60 plots distributed at the 4 campo sujo sites in the Jalapão region (Tocantins state, Brazil). A. The first two axes of non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS, r2adj = 0.60). B and C. Changes in the herb–subshrub species composition represented by the first two axes of the NMDS of abundance data. Different letters indicate differences among sites based on Tukey’s HSD multiple comparison post hoc test (p < 0.05).

Supplementary material: File

Antar et al. supplementary material

Antar et al. supplementary material 1

Download Antar et al. supplementary material(File)
File 19.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Antar et al. supplementary material

Antar et al. supplementary material 2

Download Antar et al. supplementary material(File)
File 272.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Antar et al. supplementary material

Antar et al. supplementary material 3

Download Antar et al. supplementary material(File)
File 13.6 KB