Let $G$ be a connected semisimple algebraic group defined over a number field
$k$. Consider the Lie group
$\textbf {G}=G(k\otimes \mathbb {R})$ and let us denote by
$\boldsymbol {\theta }$ a Cartan involution. A
$k$-automorphism
$\phi$ of
$G$ is said to be of Cartan type if the automorphism
$\Phi$ induced by
$\phi$ on
$\textbf {G}$ can be written as
$\Phi =\mathrm {Int}(x)\circ \boldsymbol {\theta }$ where
$\mathrm {Int}(x)$ is the inner automorphism defined by some
$x\in \textbf {G}$. Theorem 10.6 of [Reference Borel, Labesse and SchwermerBLS96] establishes the following result regarding the existence of non-trivial cuspidal cohomology classes for
$S$-arithmetic subgroups of
$G$.
Theorem 1 Let $G$ be an absolutely almost simple algebraic group defined over
$k$ that admits a Cartan-type automorphism. When the coefficient system is trivial, the cuspidal cohomology of
$G$ over
$S$ does not vanish, that is, every
$S$-arithmetic subgroup of
$G$ has a subgroup of finite index with non-zero cuspidal cohomology with respect to the trivial coefficient system.
The following assertion appears as Corollary 10.7 in [Reference Borel, Labesse and SchwermerBLS96]. Assume that $G$ is
$k$-split and
$k$ totally real or
$G = {\mathrm {Res}}_{k'/k}G'$ where
$k'$ is a CM-field. Then the cuspidal cohomology of
$G$ over
$S$ with respect to the trivial coefficient system does not vanish.
The proof of Corollary 10.7 amounts to exhibiting, in each case, a Cartan-type automorphism. In the first case, dealing with split groups, the proof is correct. As regards the second case where $G = {\mathrm {Res}}_{k'/k}G'$ with
$k'$ a CM-field, it was observed by Rohlfs and Clozel independently that the assertion (and the proof) must be corrected since, to make sense, the argument implicitly uses strong extra assumptions. First of all,
$G'$ has to be defined over
$k$ so that the complex conjugation
$c$ induced by the non-trivial element
$\sigma$ in
$\mathrm {Gal}(k'/k)$ acts as a
$k$-rational automorphism of
$G$. Observe that, strictly speaking, one has to extend the scalars from
$k$ to
$k'$ before applying the restriction functor. Further assumptions are necessary so that Corollary 10.7 in [Reference Borel, Labesse and SchwermerBLS96] should be replaced by the following statement.
Theorem 2 Let $k$ be a totally real number field and
$G$ be an absolutely almost simple algebraic group defined over
$k$. Consider the following cases:
(1)
$G$ is
$k$-split.
(2)
$G = {\mathrm {Res}}_{k'/k}G'$ where
$k'$ is a CM-field with
$G'$ defined over
$k$ totally real, satisfying one of the following hypotheses:
(2a)
$\mathbf{H}=G'(k\otimes \mathbb {R})$ has a compact Cartan subgroup;
(2b)
$G'$ is split over
$k$ and simply connected.
Then the cuspidal cohomology of $G$ over
$S$ with respect to the trivial coefficient system does not vanish.
Proof. In case (1), when $G$ is
$k$-split, the proof is given in [Reference Borel, Labesse and SchwermerBLS96]: it relies on the first case of [Reference Borel, Labesse and SchwermerBLS96, Corollary 10.7] and Theorem 1. In case (2a) the result follows from Proposition 3 below and Theorem 1. In case (2b) the assertion is a particular case of [Reference LabesseLab99, Theorem 4.7.1], which in turn relies on case (1) above.
Most of the following proposition is well known (see, in particular, [Reference ShelstadShe79, Corollary 2.9], [Reference LanglandsLan89, Lemma 3.1] and [Reference AdamsAda14, p. 2132]) but, not knowing of a convenient reference, we sketch a proof.
Consider a connected semisimple algebraic group $G_0$ defined over
$\mathbb {R}$. We denote by
$\textbf {G}=G_0(\mathbb {C})$ the group of its complex points and by
$\textbf {c}$ the complex conjugation on
$\textbf {G}$. Then
$\textbf {H}=G_0(\mathbb {R})$ is the group of fixed points under
$\textbf {c}$. This anti-holomorphic involution is induced by an
$\mathbb {R}$-automorphism
$c$ of
$G_1=\mathrm {Res}_{\mathbb {C}/\mathbb {R}}G_0$. Let
$\boldsymbol {\theta }$ be a Cartan involution of
$\textbf {G}$. The group
$\textbf {U}$ of fixed points of
$\boldsymbol {\theta }$ in
$\textbf {G}$ is a compact real form:
$\textbf {U}=U(\mathbb {R})$ where
$U$ is a form of
$G_0$ but not necessarily inner. Let
$G^{**}$ be the split outer form of
$G_0$. Choose a splitting
$(B^*,T^*, \{X_\alpha \}_{\alpha \in \Delta })$ for
$G^{**}$ over
$\mathbb {R}$ where
$T^*$ is a torus in a Borel subgroup
$B^*$ and for each
$\alpha \in \Delta$, the set of simple roots,
$X_\alpha$ is a root vector. Let
$\psi ^*$ be the automorphism of
$G^{**}$ that preserves the splitting and whose action defines
$G^*$, the quasi-split inner form of
$G_0$. Let
$w$ be the element of maximal length in the Weyl group for
$T^*$.
Proposition 3 The following assertions are equivalent.
(i) The automorphism
$c$ is of Cartan type.
(ii) The group
$\mathbf{U}$ is an inner compact real form.
(iii) The group
$\mathbf{H}$ has a compact Cartan subgroup.
(iv) The group
$\mathbf{H}$ admits discrete series.
(v) The involution
$w\circ \psi ^*$ acts by
$-1$ on the root system of
$T^*$.
Proof. The automorphism $c$ is of Cartan type if, by definition,
$\textbf {c}=\mathrm {Int}(x)\circ \boldsymbol {\theta }$ for some
$x\in \textbf {G}$, that is, if and only if
$U$ is an inner form of
$G_0$ or equivalently of
$G^*$. This proves the equivalence of (i) and (ii). Assume now that
$U$ is an inner form of
$G_0$. Up to conjugation under
$\textbf {G}$, we may assume that
$\boldsymbol {\theta }$ is of the form
$\boldsymbol {\theta }=\mathrm {Int}(x)\circ \textbf {c}$ with
$x$ in the normalizer of a maximal torus
$T$ in
$G_0$ defined over
$\mathbb {R}$. In particular,
$x$ is semisimple and its centralizer
$\textbf {L}$ in
$\textbf {G}$ is a complex reductive subgroup of maximal rank. The cocycle relation
$\mathrm {Int}(x\,\textbf {c}(x))=1$ implies that
$\textbf {L}$ is stable under
$\textbf {c}$. Then
$\textbf {c}$ induces an anti-holomorphic involution on
$\textbf {L}$ whose fixed points
$\textbf {M}=\textbf {L}\cap \textbf {H}=\textbf {U}\cap \textbf {H}$ are a compact real form of
$\textbf {L}$. A Cartan subgroup
$\textbf {C}$ of
$\textbf {M}$ is a compact Cartan subgroup in
$\textbf {H}$. Hence (ii) implies (iii). Now, consider a torus
$T$ in
$G_0$ such that
$\textbf {C}=T(\mathbb {R})$ is compact. Then the complex conjugation
$\textbf {c}$ acts by
$-1$ on the weights of
$T$. Hence there is
$n\in \textbf {G}$ which belongs to the normalizer of
$T^*\subset G^*$ such that
$\mathrm {Int}(n)\circ \psi ^*$ acts as
$-1$ on the root system of
$T^*$. Now, since
$\psi ^*$ preserves the set of positive roots,
$w=\mathrm {Int}(n)|_{T^*}$ is the element of maximal length in the Weyl group. This shows that (iii) implies (v). The equivalence of (iii) and (iv) is a well-known theorem [Reference Harish-ChandraHar66, Theorem 13] due to Harish-Chandra. Finally, Lemma 4 below shows that (v) implies (ii).
Lemma 4 Assume $w\circ \psi ^*$ acts by
$-1$ on the root system. Then
$G^*$ has an inner form
$U$ such that
$\mathbf{U}=U(\mathbb {R})$ is compact.
Proof. Consider the complex Lie algebra $\mathfrak {g}=\mathrm {Lie}(\textbf {G})$. Let
$\Sigma$ be the set of roots,
$\Sigma ^+$ the set of positive roots and
$\mathfrak {g}_\alpha$ the vector space attached to
$\alpha \in \Sigma$ with respect to the torus
$T^*(\mathbb {C})$. Following Weyl [Reference WeylWey26], Chevalley [Reference ChevalleyChe55] and Tits [Reference TitsTit66], one may choose elements
$X_\alpha \in \mathfrak {g}_\alpha$ for
${\alpha \in \Sigma }$ such that, if we define
$H_\alpha \in \mathrm {Lie}(T^*(\mathbb {C}))$ by
$H_\alpha =[X_\alpha ,X_{-\alpha }]$, we have
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20210622024150334-0107:S0010437X21007181:S0010437X21007181_eqnU1.png?pub-status=live)
We assume the splitting compatible with this choice. Now let
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20210622024150334-0107:S0010437X21007181:S0010437X21007181_eqnU2.png?pub-status=live)
The elements $Y_\alpha$ and
$Z_\alpha$ for
$\alpha \in \Sigma ^+$ together with the
$W_\alpha$ for
$\alpha \in \Delta$ build a basis for a real Lie algebra
$\mathfrak {u}$. As in the proof of [Reference HelgasonHel62, Chapter III, Theorem 6.3], we see that the Killing form is negative definite on
$\mathfrak {u}$ and hence the Lie subgroup
$\textbf {U}\subset \textbf {G}$ with Lie algebra
$\mathfrak {u}$ is compact. Since
$\psi ^*$ preserves the splitting,
$\psi ^*(X_\alpha )=X_{\psi ^*(\alpha )}$ for
$\alpha \in \Delta$. Let
$w$ be the element of maximal length in the Weyl group for
$T^*$. There is an
$n^*\in \textbf {G}$, uniquely determined modulo the center, such that the inner automorphism
$w^*=\mathrm {Int}(n^*)$ acts as
$w$ on
$T^*$ and such that
$w^*(X_\alpha )=-X_{w\alpha }$ for
$\alpha \in \Delta$. This automorphism is of order 2 and commutes with
$\psi ^*$. Now let
$\phi =w^*\circ \psi ^*$. Since
$w\circ \psi ^*$ acts by
$-1$ on
$\Sigma$ this implies
$\phi (X_\alpha )=-X_{\phi (\alpha )}=-X_{-\alpha }$ for
$\alpha \in \Delta$. It follows from the commutation relations and the relations
$N_{\alpha ,\beta }=-N_{-\alpha ,-\beta }$ that
$\phi (X_\alpha )=-X_{-\alpha }$ and
$\phi (H_\alpha )=-H_{\alpha }$ for all
$\alpha \in \Sigma$. Now
$\phi$, which acts as an automorphism of the real Lie algebras
$\mathfrak {g}^{**}$ generated by the
$X_\alpha$ for
$\alpha \in \Sigma$, can be extended to an antilinear involution of
$\mathfrak {g}^{**}\otimes \mathbb {C}=\mathfrak {g}=\mathfrak {u}+i\mathfrak {u}$. This, in turn, induces a Cartan involution
$\boldsymbol {\theta }$ on
$\textbf {G}$: its fixed point set is the compact group
$\textbf {U}=U(\mathbb {R})$ with Lie algebra
$\mathfrak {u}$, and
$U$ is the inner form of
$G^*$ defined by the Galois cocycle
$a_1=1$ and
$a_\sigma =w^*$.
We observe that when, moreover, $G^*$ is almost simple, which means that the root system of
$G^*$ is irreducible, the classification shows that condition (v) holds except when
$G^*$ is split of type
$A_n$ with
$n\geqslant 2$, or
$D_n$ with
$n\geqslant 3$ odd, or
$E_6$ or when
$G^*$ is quasi-split but non-split of type
$D_n$ with
$n\ge 4$ even.
Acknowledgements
We thank Laurent Clozel and Raphaël Beuzart-Plessis for very useful discussions as well as the referee for pertinent remarks.