Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T13:45:31.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Advances from neuroimaging studies in eating disorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2015

Guido K. W. Frank*
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Childrenʼs Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
*
*Address for correspondence: Guido K. W. Frank, MD, Departments of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Childrenʼs Hospital Colorado, Gary Pavilion A036/B-130, 13123 East 16th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. (Email: guido.frank@ucdenver.edu)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Over the past decade, brain imaging has helped to better define eating disorder–related brain circuitry. Brain research on gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) volumes had been inconsistent, possibly due to the effects of acute starvation, exercise, medication, and comorbidity, but newer studies have controlled for such effects. Those studies suggest larger left medial orbitofrontal gyrus rectus volume in ill adult and adolescent anorexia nervosa after recovery from anorexia nervosa, and in adult bulimia nervosa. The orbitofrontal cortex is important in terminating food intake, and altered function could contribute to self-starvation. The right insula, which processes taste but also interoception, was enlarged in ill adult and adolescent anorexia nervosa, as well as adults recovered from the illness. The fixed perception of being fat in anorexia nervosa could be related to altered insula function. A few studies investigated WM integrity, with the most consistent finding of reduced fornix integrity in anorexia and bulimia nervosa—a limbic pathway that is important in emotion but also food intake regulation. Functional brain imaging using basic sweet taste stimuli in eating disorders during the ill state or after recovery implicated repeatedly reward pathways, including insula and striatum. Brain imaging that targeted dopamine-related brain activity using taste-reward conditioning tasks suggested that this circuitry is hypersensitive in anorexia nervosa, but hyporesponsive in bulimia nervosa and obesity. Those results are in line with basic research and suggest adaptive reward system changes in the human brain in response to extremes of food intake—changes that could interfere with normalization of eating behavior.

Type
Review Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2015 

Introduction

The eating disorders (EDs) anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN) are severe psychiatric disorders of unknown etiology. The complex interactions between psychosocial and neurobiological abnormalities in EDs have limited the development of neuroscience-based treatments.Reference Kaye, Wierenga, Bailer, Simmons and Bischoff-Grethe 1 EDs usually begin during adolescence and occur most commonly in females. 2 Individuals with AN are typically at a body weight below 85% of that expected for age and height, and they feel fat despite being underweight. This strict weight criterion was dropped though in the new edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), as was loss of regular menses as a diagnostic criterion. A restricting-type (AN-R), marked by food restriction and commonly over-exercising has been distinguished from a binge-eating/purging–type (AN-B/P), where afflicted individuals eat large amounts of food in a relatively short period of time (“binge eating”), or engage in behaviors to counteract weight gain, such as self-induced vomiting or use of laxatives or diuretics (“purging”). BN individuals are usually at normal weight, and engage in recurrent binge eating and purging behavior at least once a week for at least 3 months. A new diagnosis, “binge eating disorder” (BED), is part of the diagnostic ED categories in DSM-5 that involves episodes of excessive eating as in BN, but without compensatory behaviors.

Brain imaging provides a “window” into the living human brain and may help elucidate mechanisms that are related to ED pathophysiology. A host of neuroimaging tools has been developed that can be used in ED research.Reference Shenton and Turetsky 3 To study brain gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) volumes, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used. In addition, cortical thickness and surface area can also be measured using MRI, although those measures are not interchangeable, as altered thickness does not necessarily translate into altered volume for instance.Reference Jalbrzikowski, Jonas and Senturk 4 A relatively novel method also based on MRI technology is diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), which measures water diffusion along axons and tests the integrity of white matter tracts, as well as whether there is damage on the level of WM cells.Reference Filler 5 The now most commonly used functional brain imaging technique is functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), which measures changes in local blood flow and resulting deoxyhemoglobin levels during brain activationReference Raichle 6 —the so-called blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) fMRI. Positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) use radioactive ligands that distribute throughout the brain. Those methods can provide information about regional cerebral glucose metabolism or distribution of neurotransmitter receptors.

In a review on brain imaging in EDs in this journal 10 years ago,Reference Frank, Bailer, Henry, Wagner and Kaye 7 the state of research was that the most common structural abnormalities found were global reductions of GM and WM in AN, with a tendency toward similar findings in ill BN—changes that tended to normalize with recovery. Further, regional cerebral blood flow and glucose metabolism were reduced in EDs in the temporal, parietal, or cingulate cortex, while limited data suggested some persistence of these findings after recovery from AN and BN. fMRI studies using visual stimuli of food or body images in AN suggested involvement of prefrontal, anterior cingulate, and parietal cortices, and a study in BN suggested altered anterior cingulate and cuneus activity in response to a sweet taste stimulus. A variety of neurotransmitter receptor studies had been done in EDs, indicating reduced serotonin (5HT) 2A receptor binding when ill and after recovery from AN. BN subjects showed increased 5HT1A receptor and reduced 5HT transporter binding when ill, but reduced 5HT2A receptor activity when recovered. Findings of 5HT disturbances after recovery especially suggested possible trait disturbances of the 5HT system that could be related to depressive symptoms or anxiety in EDs.

This article will provide a review of advancements since then in our understanding of EDs through structural and functional brain imaging. The methods described above have been more refined in the past decade, and brain circuits are now emerging that could contribute to ED development or the difficulties to recover from those often-chronic disorders. A comprehensive review would go beyond the scope of this article, however; the article is limited to advancements over the past 10 years, with a specific focus on brain taste reward processing, and each section indicates search terms used. The article further focuses on (1) brain volume, (2) white matter integrity, (3) brain neurotransmitter imaging, and (4) functional brain imaging using taste stimuli. Studies on neurocognitive brain function or cognitive-emotional processing of visual presentation of food images are not discussed in light of space limitations. The interpretation of human brain imaging data is typically complicated by the fact that the measures we take, such as brain volume or brain function measured by blood flow, are not able to identify molecular targets in the way that basic science research can by directly testing how manipulation of neurotransmitter neurons or receptors can affect illness behavior and vice versa. This review highlights in particular studies that a) investigated subjects with EDs under highly behavior-wise controlled conditions, including short term nutrition, and b) studies that used functional brain imaging models that are closely aligned with basic research. This approach will hopefully advance our understanding of a molecular neurobiology that specifically drives food avoidance, episodic overeating, or purging behavior.

Brain Volume

Research on brain structure in EDs has been inconsistent,Reference Van den Eynde, Suda and Broadbent 8 Reference Van den Eynde, Suda and Broadbent 16 with early studies suggesting reduced total GM and WM volumes, and reduced or normal total brain tissue volumes after recovery.Reference Van den Eynde, Suda and Broadbent 8 For the study of regionally specific volume alterations, brain analysis methods have become available that allow automated whole brain comparison reducing bias.Reference Van den Eynde, Suda and Broadbent 8 We searched studies using the terms anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, volume, and imaging. A recent systematic reviewReference Van den Eynde, Suda and Broadbent 8 suggested reduced GM volume in AN in insula, frontal operculum, occipital, medial temporal, or cingulate cortex, but concluded that there is a high level of heterogeneity and inconsistency across studies. One recent study found increased GM volume in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, but in contrast others reported for instance reduced dorsolateral prefrontal cortex volume in AN which predicted body mass index.Reference Joos, Kloppel and Hartmann 14 , Reference Brooks, Barker and OʼDaly 17 Reference Friederich, Walther and Bendszus 19 After short-term recovery, AN showed reduced GM in the insula, striatum, occipital, frontal, and parietal cortex,Reference Friederich, Walther and Bendszus 19 but brain tissue seems to increase with weight gain,Reference Roberto, Mayer and Brickman 21 and was normal after long-term recovery in a study in adultsReference Wagner, Greer and Bailer 22 and another in adolescents.Reference Lazaro, Andres and Calvo 23 A very recent study in adolescents and young adults with AN suggested widespread cortical thinning in AN in the ill state, but that was not the case in a group after long-term recovery from AN.Reference King, Geisler and Ritschel 20

Some studies suggested correlations between illness or environmental factors and brain volume. One study suggested that illness duration could be related to reduced cerebellum and mesencephalon volumes,Reference Fonville, Giampietro, Williams, Simmons and Tchanturia 24 and another report associated obstetric complications with larger volume and functional connectivity in AN.Reference Favaro, Tenconi, Degortes, Manara and Santonastaso 25 The mechanism regarding how such factors could cause altered brain structure is uncertain though.

A study in AN and BN indicated less gray matter in AN compared to controls and BN in the cerebellum, temporal, frontal, and occipital cortex, but reduced caudate volume in BN compared to AN and controls; furthermore, that study also found bilaterally increased somatosensory cortex volume in AN and BN groups.Reference Amianto, Caroppo and DʼAgata 26 Another study in BN suggested reduced caudate volume in the dorsal striatum but normal nucleus accumbens volume.Reference Coutinho, Ramos and Maia 29 The studies in BN otherwise suggested normal or increased localized GM volume in orbitofrontal cortex and striatum.Reference Van den Eynde, Suda and Broadbent 8 , Reference Schafer, Vaitl and Schienle 27 A new study that investigated cortical thickness in BN found widespread brain surface volume reductions in frontal and temporo-parietal areas.Reference Marsh, Stefan, Bansal, Hao, Walsh and Peterson 28

These variable results may reflect the heterogeneity of approaches, as only some studies corrected for age or overall brain volumes, some studies distinguished restricting from binge eating/purging AN while others did not, and the effects of comorbid diagnoses or medication were often not directly taken into account. Especially important for ED research are the acute effects of dehydration and starvation,Reference Streitburger, Moller, Tittgemeyer, Hund-Georgiadis, Schroeter and Mueller 30 as well as excessive exercise.Reference Freund, Faust and Birklein 31 Those factors may contribute to brain volume changes that relate to the acute state of dehydration or nourishment, but may not be directly related an underlying specific ED pathophysiology. Especially the studies that show widespread alterations across more or less the entire cortex may be confounded by global effects of malnutrition, and may reveal less about brain pathology that actually drives eating disorder behavior. This hypothesis is supported by a study that found that the faster adolescents had lost weight and presumably the more they had restricted food and fluid intake, the smaller their brain gray matter volume was.Reference Bomba, Riva and Veggo 32

In an effort to avoid the effects of acute starvation, malnutrition, and dehydration, we recently studied a sample of currently ill ED individuals who had been in highly supervised treatment including a fixed meal plan for between 1 and 2 weeks and thus were nutritionally highly controlled. In addition, we controlled for age, depression, anxiety, medication-use, and brain volume. We found that brain GM volume could identify shared abnormalities among ED groups but also distinguish AN from BN individuals.Reference Frank, Shott, Hagman and Mittal 33 This sample of individuals with restricting-type currently ill (n=19) or recovered AN (n=24), ill BN (n=19), and healthy control women (n=24) showed increased GM volume of the medial orbitofrontal cortex gyrus rectus. In addition, ill and recovered AN had increased right insula GM volumes, while BN individuals had increased left insula GM volumes compared to controls. Furthermore, dorsal striatum volumes were reduced in BN and recovered AN, and predicted sensitivity to reward in all ED groups. We also studied adolescents with AN (n=19) and controls (n=22), with similar methods. AN adolescents showed increased left orbitofrontal and right insular volumes similarly to AN adults compared to controls (see Figure 1).Reference Frank, Shott, Hagman and Yang 34 A recent study in obesity from our group suggests, in contrast, reduced orbitofrontal cortex gyrus rectus volume.Reference Shott, Cornier and Mittal 35

Figure 1 Increased left orbitofrontal gyrus rectus and right insula volume in anorexia nervosa across states of illness and age groups.

The orbitofrontal cortex is important in food intake control, telling us when to stop a certain type of food, regulating so-called sensory specific satiety.Reference Rolls 36 It is possible that larger orbitofrontal gyrus rectus in EDs is associated with stronger sensory experience of food and maybe also other salient stimuli,Reference Frank, Reynolds and Shott 37 which could drive food avoidance. In fact, the medial orbitofrontal cortex has previously been associated with food avoidance,Reference Plassmann, OʼDoherty and Rangel 38 and this region therefore could be a key structure in EDs. ED phenotypes differ with restriction in AN and episodic binge eating in bulimia on the contrary—behaviors that may be driven by insula and basal ganglia differences between the two disorders.Reference Frank, Reynolds and Shott 37 , Reference Frank, Reynolds, Shott and OʼReilly 39 The left insula receives information on gastric distentionReference Craig 40 and self-reported fullness.Reference Wang, Tomasi and Backus 41 Thus, altered insula size could interfere with normal interoception in bulimia, which may contribute to a reduced ability to sense “fullness” or satiation, and then guilt-experienced overeating may trigger the urge to purge after excessive food intake. In healthy controls, left sided anterior and posterior insula activation was associated with gastric distension, and this was mediated by body mass index (BMI)Reference Tomasi, Wang and Wang 42 —supporting the idea that alterations in the left insula could indeed contribute to inadequately feeling full and interfering with meal termination. The right anterior insula has been associated with self-recognition, the “abstract representation of oneself,”Reference Devue, Collette and Balteau 43 and interoceptive awareness,Reference Critchley, Wiens, Rotshtein, Ohman and Dolan 44 and so a fixed perception of being fat while severely underweight in ANReference Konstantakopoulos, Varsou and Dikeos 45 could thus be related to right-sided, increased, abnormal anterior insula volume.

Importantly, these and other dataReference Bomba, Riva and Veggo 32 suggest that when studying currently ill ED individuals, it is imperative to control for nutritional state as well as comorbidity and medication use in order to be able to get more consistent results, as well as identify brain alterations that are important for relevant ED behavior, as opposed to results that are mostly related to quickly changing effects of starvation. Controlling for those effects is not only important for volumetric studies, but new research also indicates that this factor affects studies on brain activity and function.Reference Dukart and Bertolino 46

White Matter Integrity

Brain WM axons physically connect cortical and subcortical brain structures, and thus could have critical impact on cognitive and emotional processing.Reference Dehaene and Changeux 47 Brain research that targets WM function uses the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique diffusion tensor imaging (DTI).Reference Filler 5 DTI measures water diffusion along WM tracts, which is expressed as fractional anisotropy (FA). Higher FA is thought to reflect better axonal coherence, density, and myelination.Reference Le Bihan 48 Other measures, such as the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) or mean diffusion coefficient, provide information about the average diffusion-freedom water molecules have across cells and correlates with local cell breakdown.Reference Jiang, van Zijl, Kim, Pearlson and Mori 49 In this section, we searched for white matter, anorexia, and bulimia nervosa as search terms.

The first study in this research area came from our group and showed in adult ill AN compared to controls reduced FA in the bilateral fimbria-fornix, fronto-occipital fasciculus, and posterior cingulum WM, and harm avoidance was predicted by bilateral fimbria-fornix FA in AN but not controls.Reference Kazlouski, Rollin and Tregellas 50 Those findings were not due to WM volume deficits and suggested alterations in limbic and association pathways, which could contribute to disturbed feeding, emotion processing, and body perception in AN. The prediction of harm avoidance in AN by fimbria-fornix WM integrity suggested that this pathway may be mechanistically involved in high anxiety in AN. Altered fornix WM diffusivity in adults with AN was most recently supported by 2 additional studies.Reference Nagahara, Nakamae and Nishizawa 51 , Reference Via, Zalesky and Sanchez 52 One of those studiesReference Nagahara, Nakamae and Nishizawa 51 also found positive correlations between BMI and FA, suggesting that weight loss could be related to the changes found. A DTI study in a mixed sample of ill and recovered adult AN found FA reductions in the posterior thalamic radiation, which includes the optic radiation, and the left mediodorsal thalamus. Those alterations could be related to body image distortion, as those pathways connect the extrastriate visual cortex with other brain regions involved in body perception.Reference Frieling, Fischer and Wilhelm 53 A small study in AN after recovery indicated no FA differences between AN and control subjects, although more severe illness history was associated with lower WM integrity, and low power may have precluded significant group differences.Reference Yau, Bischoff-Grethe and Theilmann 54 WM integrity in adolescents with AN was lower in fornix, posterior frontal, and parietal areas, but higher in anterior frontal, orbitofrontal, and temporal lobes.Reference Frank, Shott, Hagman and Yang 34 Those results of both increased and decreased WM integrity measures in adolescents are interesting, and could indicate an interaction of normal developmental and ED-specific changes of WM over time. That is, ED behavior could interfere with normal WM growth in adolescence, thereby leading to long-lasting or permanent WM alterations that will be part of the larger ED brain pathophysiology. In adults with BN, FA was decreased in the bilateral corona radiata extending into the posterior limb of the internal capsule, corpus callosum, right sub-insular white matter, and right fornix.Reference Mettler, Shott, Pryor, Yang and Frank 55 The fornix alterations pointed to a possibly common alteration of WM across ED subtypes. Lesions to the corona radiata and internal capsule have been found in central taste disorders,Reference Onoda, Ikeda, Sekine and Ogawa 56 and deep brain stimulation in the internal capsule leads to altered taste and smell perception, as well as anxiety, panic, and mood alterations.Reference Okun, Mann and Foote 57 Thus lesions in the corona radiata in BN could be related to a variety of specific or associated behaviors found in BN, such as mood disturbance or anxiety.

In summary, the number of studies on WM integrity in EDs is very small, but so far the results suggest that reduced fornix FA is common across AN and BN groups. The fornix is part of the limbic system, which is involved in reward processingReference Salinas and White 58 and emotion,Reference Dalgleish 59 but also feeding regulation as well as behavior extinction.Reference Osborne, Silverhart, Markgraf and Seggie 60 The clinical significance of those findings will need further study, and whether this is a premorbid condition or an effect from the illness.

Brain Function with Focus on Taste-Reward Processing

Food intake is driven by a complex interplay between cognitive, emotional, and energy homeostasis–maintaining mechanisms between brain and body.Reference Kringelbach 61 There is a cognitive or cephalic phase that involves desire or craving, as well as a consummatory phase involving the hedonic experience. These mechanisms were then further described as dopamine function–associated “wanting,” or the drive to approach a reward, and “liking,” or the hedonic experience during food consumption associated with opioid system activity.Reference Berridge 62 , Reference Kelley, Schiltz and Landry 63 Those processes are regulated by the brain reward system, which integrates more basic metabolic hunger signals with higher order processing of taste and cognitive-emotional factors that drive whether we approach or do not approach food stimuli.Reference Lak, Stauffer and Schultz 64 Important brain regions that regulate those processes are the insula, as the primary taste cortex and central gateway to the dopaminergic basal ganglia and midbrain, to higher order brain centers, including the prefrontal and cingulate cortex, which integrates cognition and emotions; the orbitofrontal cortex, which determines when to stop eating a type of food; and the amygdala, which associates stimuli with emotional experience and which is thought to modulate dopamine circuitry in the midbrain and striatum.Reference Kringelbach and Rolls 65 Reference OʼReilly 67

Several studies have investigated brain taste-reward circuits in eating disorders, and in this section, we review functional imaging studies using the search terms anorexia, bulimia, imaging, and taste. The primary focus in this review is on simple sweet taste stimuli, such as sucrose. Individuals who were recovered from AN showed reduced functional brain response to repeated but increased response to randomly given sweet taste stimuli,Reference Cowdrey, Park, Harmer and McCabe 68 Reference Wagner, Aizenstein and Mazurkewicz 70 and those results in opposite directions suggest that unpredictable and predictable stimulus presentation activate differently circuits or neurotransmitter systems, when studying AN. Whether there are stimulus impendent reward system alterations remains to be seen. Studies using monetary reward stimuli indicated that subjects who had recovered from AN or BN showed, with respect to brain activation, less of a distinction in brain response to gain versus loss,Reference Wagner, Aizenstein and Venkatraman 71 , Reference Wagner, Aizenstein and Venkatraman 72 suggesting that there could be distinct reward circuit alterations depending on the saliency of the stimulus. Another approach is to pair unconditioned taste stimuli with conditioned visual or auditory stimuli and then randomly omit an expected taste delivery or deliver a taste stimulus when none was expected. This leads to a discrepancy between reward anticipated or predicted and the reward actually received, the so called “prediction error,” which is reflected in dopamine neuronal response.Reference Schultz, Dayan and Montague 73 We have previously applied a prediction error taste-reward task using the sugar solution and visual conditioned cues in AN, and compared this group with obese individuals; the rationale is that we might detect neurobiological alterations that lie on opposite ends,Reference Frank, Reynolds and Shott 37 as basic research has suggested.Reference Avena, Rada and Hoebel 74 , Reference Johnson and Kenny 75 We found that insula and ventral striatum prediction error response were greater or more sensitive in AN compared to controls, while obese individuals showed reduced response, supporting the notion that BMI and extremes of food intake may lead to adaptations of brain prediction error and thus dopamine brain response in humans. A similar study in BN found prediction error response reduced compared to controls,Reference Frank, Reynolds, Shott and OʼReilly 39 but not as much as in OB (see Figure 2). BN subjects’ BMI typically lies between controls and OB subjects and BMI may therefore directly be predictive of dopamine related prediction error brain response. Those results of altered prediction error response across ED groups are potentially mechanistically important, as specific dopamine receptors have been implicated, such as the dopamine D1 and D2 receptor,Reference Maia and Frank 76 making those receptors potential treatment targets. Otherwise, the literature on taste-reward in BN is small. After a small pilot study found lower anterior cingulate activation after sucrose stimulation in individuals who had bulimic symptoms in the past,Reference Frank, Wagner and Achenbach 77 2 studies in BN after recovery indicated increased brain response in that group compared to controls. One of those studies applied repeated fat and high viscous stimuli and reported increased activation in the anteroventral striatum.Reference Radeloff, Willmann and Otto 78 The other study, which used a task with recurrent sweet taste solution delivery, reported heightened anterior insula activation.Reference Oberndorfer, Frank and Simmons 69

Figure 2 Taste-reward prediction error response across groups with disordered eating patterns.

We know little about reward processing in youth with ED, and only one small study tested this system in adolescents with AN.Reference Bischoff-Grethe, McCurdy and Grenesko-Stevens 79 In that study, AN adolescents exhibited an exaggerated response to losses compared to wins in posterior executive and sensorimotor striatal regions, which supports the notion that AN is associated with heightened sensitivity to salient stimuli.Reference Jappe, Frank and Shott 80

In contrast to studying taste stimuli that are limited to basic nutrients such as sugars, others have investigated complex taste and food stimuli. This may have the benefit to reflect more real life situations. On the other hand, those stimuli may be more difficult to model with respect to the underlying neurobiology of taste pathways. The emotional or pleasantness value that ED subjects assign to a simple sugar solution tends to be similar to controls, while complex tastes such as highly palatable sugar/fat combinations could be associated with for instance higher fear in the ED groups, which might confound the more basic taste pathway signal. One study, for instance, applied chocolate milk and found greater activation in the right amygdala and left medial temporal gyrus in restricting-type AN compared to controls when hungry, contrasted against the satiety state.Reference Vocks, Herpertz, Rosenberger, Senf and Gizewski 81 This could be a sign of heightened vigilance and anxiety in that group, as having the chocolate milk indicates breaking the fasting and promoting weight gain by drinking the caloric beverage. Another study that applied a chocolate milkshake found that women with BN had a positive correlation between negative affect and activity in the putamen, caudate, and pallidum during milkshake anticipation.Reference Bohon and Stice 82 It was hypothesized that negative affect may increase the reward value of food in BN, but it may be more likely that negative affect became a conditioned response to palatable food, as it is associated with weight gain.

In summary, repeated and thus predictable application of basic sweet taste stimuli has been associated with reduced activation of taste-reward important regions, such as the insula and ventral striatum in AN, but increased activation in BN. The opposite, though, is the case for random application of those stimuli. This may suggest that there may be an interaction between conscious cognitive-emotional and more unconscious biological mechanisms that drive food approach and eating. A potential explanation here may be that during repeated taste application, the AN subjects “prepare” themselves and control brain response in order to avoid too high stimulation; however, during the random application, this control is not possible and an enhanced responsiveness in AN is coming to light. In BN, a reduced biological responsiveness to taste stimulation becomes obvious during random application, while the repeated taste stimulation could kindle and enhance the low baseline response, maybe through the repeated hedonic experience.

Networks

A variety of functionally connected brain networks has been identified that drive behavior, including the default mode network (DMN), salience network (SN), and executive networks for “higher-order” processing, as well as sensory and sensorimotor (SMN) networks for “lower-order” function.Reference Heine, Soddu and Gomez 83 We used the search terms anorexia, bulimia nervosa, network, and connectivity, but few studies have investigated those networks in EDs. Importantly, the methods vary: some studies investigated connectivity during resting state, others during performance of a task; some studies adhere to more strict observation of distinctly described networks, while others investigated connectivity or synchronicity of various brain regions and then speculated on functional networks involved. One study found decreased activity within the ventral visual network in ill and recovered AN patients compared to controls, but also found increased somatosensory network activity in AN.Reference Favaro, Santonastaso and Manara 84 This could be in line with a recent study that found altered connectivity in visual pathways when viewing human bodies,Reference Suchan, Bauser and Busch 85 suggesting overall visual network disturbances that could be related to altered body/self perception. One study in recovered AN showed increased DMN activity,Reference Cowdrey, Filippini, Park, Smith and McCabe 86 and in a study that contrasted AN, BN, and controls, patterns of connectivity between insula and frontal brain regions distinguished groups during a visual food cue task.Reference Kim, Ku, Lee, Lee and Jung 87 A recent study found alterations in connectivity patterns within the cerebellum in AN and BN compared to controls,Reference Amianto, DʼAgata and Lavagnino 88 but the meaning and/or functional implications are uncertain. Similarly, a study in a small sample of AN indicated reduced resting state connectivity in AN in the frontal cortex in regions that contribute to cognitive control.Reference Kullmann, Giel, Teufel, Thiel, Zipfel and Preissl 89 That study further indicated an interesting distinction, that is, from the inferior frontal gyrus to the cingulum connectivity decreased, but to the orbitofrontal cortex connectivity increased in the AN group. A study from our group found reduced SN activity during taste stimuli delivery in ill and recovered AN compared to controls, which could be a trait-related biomarker or illness remnant altering the drive to approach food.Reference McFadden, Tregellas, Shott and Frank 90 We also found reduced DMN and SMN activity but in ill AN only, suggesting state-dependent abnormalities, possibly related to altered interoception and body image in AN when underweight, but remitting following recovery.

Taken together, this literature is still very small, but it seems that visual and salience network alterations could be involved in the pathophysiology of EDs, as state-dependent factors or even as biological traits.

Neurotransmitters

Neurotransmitter receptor imaging studies assess the “functional availability” of neurotransmitter receptors in the brain. Several studies have advanced our knowledge over the past decade, although there has also been a limitation in available receptor ligands that can be used in humans, which thus limits our ability to characterize comprehensively neurotransmitter receptor systems. Serotonin (5-HT) 1A receptor binding was found to be elevated across most brain regions in a mixed group of symptomatic restricting and binge eating/purging–type AN subjects compared to controls, as well as in binge eating/purging type AN after recovery.Reference Bailer, Frank and Henry 91 In contrast, recovered restricting-type AN individuals showed normal brain 5-HT1A binding.Reference Bailer, Frank and Henry 91 In addition, reduced 5-HT2A binding in frontal, parietal, and occipital cortices in ill and recovered AN individuals was found.Reference Frank, Kaye and Meltzer 92 In summary, after recovery, 5-HT1A receptor binding seems to differentiate AN subtypes, whereas 5-HT2A receptor binding is reduced in both restricting and binge eating/purging AN in various brain regions. Since these disturbances occur after recovery, they may reflect either trait disturbances or scars from the illness.

Various studies could correlate 5HT receptor availability or the interaction between 5HT and DA receptors with harm avoidance, which is a behavioral correlate of anxiety,Reference Bailer, Frank and Price 93 but the exact mechanisms or functional relationships need further study. In BN, 5-HT transporter binding was reduced in the thalamus and hypothalamus,Reference Tauscher, Pirker and Willeit 94 but 5-HT1A receptor binding was increasedReference Tiihonen, Keski-Rahkonen and Lopponen 95 in the medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate, and parietal cortex. After recovery, BN had increased 5-HT1A binding compared to controls,Reference Bailer, Bloss and Frank 96 and 5-HT1A binding in BN predicted inhibition. The dynamics between 5-HT receptor expression and synaptic 5-HT are not well understood, but reduced 5-HT2A binding in recovered BN subjects may be related to a higher level of endogenous 5-HT in the synaptic cleft, or a downregulation of the receptor.

A mixed group of recovered restricting-type and recovered binge-eating/purging–type AN women showed increased DA D2/D3 receptor binding in the antero-ventral striatum,Reference Frank, Bailer and Henry 97 while decreased DA D2/D3 receptor binding was found in obesity.Reference Wang, Volkow, Thanos and Fowler 98 Those findings support the possibility that D2/D3 receptor binding may be inversely related to weight and eating, with restricting-type AN on one end and obesity on the other end of the spectrum. It is possible that increased DA D2/D3 receptor binding in AN is part of underlying mechanisms that may explain why individuals with AN are able to resist eating. It is worth noting that food restriction sensitizes D2/D3 receptors, while excessive food intake downregulates DA D2 receptors in rats; similar mechanisms in AN or obesity could complicate recovery.Reference Johnson and Kenny 75 A very recent study found that BN individuals had a trend to lower DA D2/3 receptor binding in the striatum as well as less DA release compared to controls in response to methylphenidate application.Reference Broft, Shingleton and Kaufman 99 While overall this body of research is small, it suggests that food restriction in AN may increase and episodic binge eating in BN or chronic overeating in obesity could reduce DA receptor activity.

Conclusion

Brain imaging will continue to be an important tool for brain research in EDs, although it is not ready to be used yet as a diagnostic tool or for directing intervention.Reference Frank 100 The studies conducted over the past decade have furthered our understanding of the pathophysiology of EDs in various ways. First, studies show that it is highly important to carefully select study subjects and control for nutritional status and comorbid conditions in order to identify brain regions that have functional importance and are not only a reflection of dehydration and malnutrition. From the aggregate of studies, there is now strong evidence that reward pathways may have a central role in ED pathophysiology. The orbitofrontal cortex and connecting fibers are altered across EDs, and a larger volume of the orbitofrontal cortex could contribute to being able to stop eating before the physiological need is met. Another key region is the insula, which is altered across a variety of structural and functional studies. Those regions are part of the taste-reward system, which supports the evidence that reward pathways are implicated in EDs. Within that network, it is possible that AN is associated with heightened and BN and obesity with reduced dopamine related circuit responsiveness. Importantly, those results could point toward future pharmacological interventions, as specific DA receptors are associated with brain reward function. This is supported by the reviewed brain neurotransmitters studies that indicate higher DA D2/D3 receptor availability in AN. Future research will have to combine PET neurotransmitter as well as fMRI studies in order to better integrate behavior, molecular targets, and neuronal activity and function. Results from network connectivity studies are few and variable, but there seems to be also at least some convergence pointing to altered reward circuit function. Specifically those studies indicate differences in salience network activity compared to controls, which may interfere with a normal orientation toward food-related stimuli, as opposed to, for instance, focus on academic study and achievement and overriding such basic needs.

Disclosures

Guido Frank does not have anything to disclose.

References

1. Kaye, WH, Wierenga, CE, Bailer, UF, Simmons, AN, Bischoff-Grethe, A. Nothing tastes as good as skinny feels: the neurobiology of anorexia nervosa. Trends Neurosci. 2013; 36(2): 110120.Google Scholar
2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.Google Scholar
3. Shenton, ME, Turetsky, BI. Understanding Neuropsychiatric Disorders: Insights From Neuroimaging. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2011.Google Scholar
4. Jalbrzikowski, M, Jonas, R, Senturk, D, et al. Structural abnormalities in cortical volume, thickness, and surface area in 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome: relationship with psychotic symptoms. Neuroimage Clin. 2013; 3: 405415.Google Scholar
5. Filler, A. Magnetic resonance neurography and diffusion tensor imaging: origins, history, and clinical impact of the first 50,000 cases with an assessment of efficacy and utility in a prospective 5000-patient study group. Neurosurgery. 2009; 65(4 Suppl): A29A43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Raichle, ME. Behind the scenes of functional brain imaging: a historical and physiological perspective. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95(3): 765772.Google Scholar
7. Frank, GK, Bailer, UF, Henry, S, Wagner, A, Kaye, WH. Neuroimaging studies in eating disorders. CNS Spectr. 2004; 9(7): 539548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Van den Eynde, F, Suda, M, Broadbent, H, et al. Structural magnetic resonance imaging in eating disorders: a systematic review of voxel-based morphometry studies. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2012; 20(2): 94105.Google Scholar
9. Boghi, A, Sterpone, S, Sales, S, et al. In vivo evidence of global and focal brain alterations in anorexia nervosa. Psychiatry Res. 2011; 192(3): 154159.Google Scholar
10. Castro-Fornieles, J, Bargallo, N, Lazaro, L, et al. A cross-sectional and follow-up voxel-based morphometric MRI study in adolescent anorexia nervosa. J Psychiatr Res. 2009; 43(3): 331340.Google Scholar
11. Connan, F, Murphy, F, Connor, SE, et al. Hippocampal volume and cognitive function in anorexia nervosa. Psychiatry Res. 2006; 146(2): 117125.Google Scholar
12. Gaudio, S, Nocchi, F, Franchin, T, et al. Gray matter decrease distribution in the early stages of anorexia nervosa restrictive type in adolescents. Psychiatry Res. 2011; 191(1): 2430.Google Scholar
13. Joos, A, Hartmann, A, Glauche, V, et al. Grey matter deficit in long-term recovered anorexia nervosa patients. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2011; 19(1): 5963.Google Scholar
14. Joos, A, Kloppel, S, Hartmann, A, et al. Voxel-based morphometry in eating disorders: correlation of psychopathology with grey matter volume. Psychiatry Res. 2010; 182(2): 146151.Google Scholar
15. McCormick, LM, Keel, PK, Brumm, MC, et al. Implications of starvation-induced change in right dorsal anterior cingulate volume in anorexia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord. 2008; 41(7): 602610.Google Scholar
16. Muhlau, M, Gaser, C, Ilg, R, et al. Gray matter decrease of the anterior cingulate cortex in anorexia nervosa. Am J Psychiatry. 2007; 164(12): 18501857.Google Scholar
17. Brooks, SJ, Barker, GJ, OʼDaly, OG, et al. Restraint of appetite and reduced regional brain volumes in anorexia nervosa: a voxel-based morphometric study. BMC Psychiatry. 2011; 11: 179.Google Scholar
18. Suchan, B, Busch, M, Schulte, D, Gronemeyer, D, Herpertz, S, Vocks, S. Reduction of gray matter density in the extrastriate body area in women with anorexia nervosa. Behav Brain Res. 2010; 206(1): 6367.Google Scholar
19. Friederich, HC, Walther, S, Bendszus, M, et al. Grey matter abnormalities within cortico-limbic-striatal circuits in acute and weight-restored anorexia nervosa patients. Neuroimage. 2012; 59(2): 11061113.Google Scholar
20. King, JA, Geisler, D, Ritschel, F, et al. Global cortical thinning in acute anorexia nervosa normalizes following long-term weight restoration. Biol Psychiatry. 2015; 77(7): 624632.Google Scholar
21. Roberto, CA, Mayer, LE, Brickman, AM, et al. Brain tissue volume changes following weight gain in adults with anorexia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord. 2011; 44(5): 406411.Google Scholar
22. Wagner, A, Greer, P, Bailer, U, et al. Normal brain tissue volumes after long-term recovery in anorexia and bulimia nervosa. Biol Psychiatry. 2006; 59(3): 291293.Google Scholar
23. Lazaro, L, Andres, S, Calvo, A, et al. Normal gray and white matter volume after weight restoration in adolescents with anorexia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord. 2013; 46(8): 841848.Google Scholar
24. Fonville, L, Giampietro, V, Williams, SC, Simmons, A, Tchanturia, K. Alterations in brain structure in adults with anorexia nervosa and the impact of illness duration. Psychol Med. 2014; 44(9): 19651975.Google Scholar
25. Favaro, A, Tenconi, E, Degortes, D, Manara, R, Santonastaso, P. Effects of obstetric complications on volume and functional connectivity of striatum in anorexia nervosa patients. Int J Eat Disord. 2014; 47(7): 686695.Google Scholar
26. Amianto, F, Caroppo, P, DʼAgata, F, et al. Brain volumetric abnormalities in patients with anorexia and bulimia nervosa: a voxel-based morphometry study. Psychiatry Res. 2013; 213(3): 210216.Google Scholar
27. Schafer, A, Vaitl, D, Schienle, A. Regional grey matter volume abnormalities in bulimia nervosa and binge-eating disorder. Neuroimage. 2010; 50(2): 639643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Marsh, R, Stefan, M, Bansal, R, Hao, X, Walsh, BT, Peterson, BS. Anatomical characteristics of the cerebral surface in bulimia nervosa. Biol Psychiatry. 2015; 77(7): 616623.Google Scholar
29. Coutinho, J, Ramos, AF, Maia, L, et al. Volumetric alterations in the nucleus accumbens and caudate nucleus in bulimia nervosa: a structural magnetic resonance imaging study. Int J Eat Disord. 2015; 48(2): 206214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30. Streitburger, DP, Moller, HE, Tittgemeyer, M, Hund-Georgiadis, M, Schroeter, ML, Mueller, K. Investigating structural brain changes of dehydration using voxel-based morphometry. PLoS One. 2012; 7(8): e44195.Google Scholar
31. Freund, W, Faust, S, Birklein, F, et al. Substantial and reversible brain gray matter reduction but no acute brain lesions in ultramarathon runners: experience from the TransEurope-FootRace Project. BMC Med. 2012; 10: 170.Google Scholar
32. Bomba, M, Riva, A, Veggo, F, et al. Impact of speed and magnitude of weight loss on the development of brain trophic changes in adolescents with anorexia nervosa: a case control study. Ital J Pediatr. 2013; 39: 14.Google Scholar
33. Frank, GK, Shott, ME, Hagman, JO, Mittal, VA. Alterations in brain structures related to taste reward circuitry in ill and recovered anorexia nervosa and in bulimia nervosa. Am J Psychiatry. 2013; 170(10): 11521160.Google Scholar
34. Frank, GK, Shott, ME, Hagman, JO, Yang, TT. Localized brain volume and white matter integrity alterations in adolescent anorexia nervosa. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013; 52(10): 10661075.Google Scholar
35. Shott, ME, Cornier, MA, Mittal, VA, et al. Orbitofrontal cortex volume and brain reward response in obesity. Int J Obes. (Lond.). 2015; 39(2): 214221.Google Scholar
36. Rolls, ET. Functions of the orbitofrontal and pregenual cingulate cortex in taste, olfaction, appetite and emotion. Acta Physiol Hung. 2008; 95(2): 131164.Google Scholar
37. Frank, GK, Reynolds, JR, Shott, ME, et al. Anorexia nervosa and obesity are associated with opposite brain reward response. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012; 37(9): 20312046.Google Scholar
38. Plassmann, H, OʼDoherty, JP, Rangel, A. Appetitive and aversive goal values are encoded in the medial orbitofrontal cortex at the time of decision making. J Neurosci. 2010; 30(32): 1079910808.Google Scholar
39. Frank, GK, Reynolds, JR, Shott, ME, OʼReilly, RC. Altered temporal difference learning in bulimia nervosa. Biol Psychiatry. 2011; 70(8): 728735.Google Scholar
40. Craig, AD. How do you feel—now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009; 10(1): 5970.Google Scholar
41. Wang, GJ, Tomasi, D, Backus, W, et al. Gastric distention activates satiety circuitry in the human brain. Neuroimage. 2008; 39(4): 18241831.Google Scholar
42. Tomasi, D, Wang, GJ, Wang, R, et al. Association of body mass and brain activation during gastric distention: implications for obesity. PLoS One. 2009; 4(8): e6847.Google Scholar
43. Devue, C, Collette, F, Balteau, E, et al. Here I am: the cortical correlates of visual self-recognition. Brain Res. 2007; 1143: 169182.Google Scholar
44. Critchley, HD, Wiens, S, Rotshtein, P, Ohman, A, Dolan, RJ. Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness. Nat Neurosci. 2004; 7(2): 189195.Google Scholar
45. Konstantakopoulos, G, Varsou, E, Dikeos, D, et al. Delusionality of body image beliefs in eating disorders. Psychiatry Res. 2012; 200(2–3): 482488.Google Scholar
46. Dukart, J, Bertolino, A. When structure affects function—the need for partial volume effect correction in functional and resting state magnetic resonance imaging studies. PLoS One. 2014; 9(12): e114227.Google Scholar
47. Dehaene, S, Changeux, JP. Reward-dependent learning in neuronal networks for planning and decision making. Prog Brain Res. 2000; 126: 217229.Google Scholar
48. Le Bihan, D. Looking into the functional architecture of the brain with diffusion MRI. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003; 4(6): 469480.Google Scholar
49. Jiang, H, van Zijl, PC, Kim, J, Pearlson, GD, Mori, S. DtiStudio: resource program for diffusion tensor computation and fiber bundle tracking. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2006; 81(2): 106116.Google Scholar
50. Kazlouski, D, Rollin, MD, Tregellas, J, et al. Altered fimbria-fornix white matter integrity in anorexia nervosa predicts harm avoidance. Psychiatry Res. 2011; 192(2): 109116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51. Nagahara, Y, Nakamae, T, Nishizawa, S, et al. A tract-based spatial statistics study in anorexia nervosa: abnormality in the fornix and the cerebellum. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2014; 51: 7277.Google Scholar
52. Via, E, Zalesky, A, Sanchez, I, et al. Disruption of brain white matter microstructure in women with anorexia nervosa. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2014; 39(6): 367375.Google Scholar
53. Frieling, H, Fischer, J, Wilhelm, J, et al. Microstructural abnormalities of the posterior thalamic radiation and the mediodorsal thalamic nuclei in females with anorexia nervosa—a voxel based diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) study. J Psychiatr Res. 2012; 46(9): 12371242.Google Scholar
54. Yau, WY, Bischoff-Grethe, A, Theilmann, RJ, et al. Alterations in white matter microstructure in women recovered from anorexia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord. 2013; 46(7): 701708.Google Scholar
55. Mettler, LN, Shott, ME, Pryor, T, Yang, TT, Frank, GK. White matter integrity is reduced in bulimia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord. 2013; 46(3): 264273.Google Scholar
56. Onoda, K, Ikeda, M, Sekine, H, Ogawa, H. Clinical study of central taste disorders and discussion of the central gustatory pathway. J Neurol. 2012; 259(2): 261266.Google Scholar
57. Okun, MS, Mann, G, Foote, KD, et al. Deep brain stimulation in the internal capsule and nucleus accumbens region: responses observed during active and sham programming. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007; 78(3): 310314.Google Scholar
58. Salinas, JA, White, NM. Contributions of the hippocampus, amygdala, and dorsal striatum to the response elicited by reward reduction. Behav Neurosci. 1998; 112(4): 812826.Google Scholar
59. Dalgleish, T. The emotional brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004; 5(7): 583589.Google Scholar
60. Osborne, B, Silverhart, T, Markgraf, C, Seggie, J. Effects of fornix transection and pituitary-adrenal modulation on extinction behavior. Behav Neurosci. 1987; 101(4): 504512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61. Kringelbach, ML. Food for thought: hedonic experience beyond homeostasis in the human brain. Neuroscience. 2004; 126(4): 807819.Google Scholar
62. Berridge, KC. Food reward: brain substrates of wanting and liking. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1996; 20(1): 125.Google Scholar
63. Kelley, AE, Schiltz, CA, Landry, CF. Neural systems recruited by drug- and food-related cues: studies of gene activation in corticolimbic regions. Physiol Behav. 2005; 86(1–2): 1114.Google Scholar
64. Lak, A, Stauffer, WR, Schultz, W. Dopamine prediction error responses integrate subjective value from different reward dimensions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(6): 23432348.Google Scholar
65. Kringelbach, ML, Rolls, E. The functional neuroanatomy of the human orbitofrontal cortex: evidence from neuroimaging and neuropsychology. Prog Neurobiol. 2004; 72(5): 341372.Google Scholar
66. Rolls, ET. Taste, olfactory and food texture reward processing in the brain and obesity. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011; 35(4): 550561.Google Scholar
67. OʼReilly, RC. Biologically based computational models of high-level cognition. Science. 2006; 314(5796): 9194.Google Scholar
68. Cowdrey, FA, Park, RJ, Harmer, CJ, McCabe, C. Increased neural processing of rewarding and aversive food stimuli in recovered anorexia nervosa. Biol Psychiatry. 2011; 70(8): 736743.Google Scholar
69. Oberndorfer, TA, Frank, GK, Simmons, AN, et al. Altered insula response to sweet taste processing after recovery from anorexia and bulimia nervosa. Am J Psychiatry. 2013; 170(10): 11431151.Google Scholar
70. Wagner, A, Aizenstein, H, Mazurkewicz, L, et al. Altered insula response to taste stimuli in individuals recovered from restricting-type anorexia nervosa. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008; 33(3): 513523.Google Scholar
71. Wagner, A, Aizenstein, H, Venkatraman, VK, et al. Altered striatal response to reward in bulimia nervosa after recovery. Int J Eat Disord. 2010; 43(4): 289294.Google Scholar
72. Wagner, A, Aizenstein, H, Venkatraman, VK, et al. Altered reward processing in women recovered from anorexia nervosa. Am J Psychiatry. 2007; 164(12): 18421849.Google Scholar
73. Schultz, W, Dayan, P, Montague, PR. A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science. 1997; 275(5306): 15931599.Google Scholar
74. Avena, NM, Rada, P, Hoebel, BG. Underweight rats have enhanced dopamine release and blunted acetylcholine response in the nucleus accumbens while bingeing on sucrose. Neuroscience. 2008; 156(4): 865871.Google Scholar
75. Johnson, PM, Kenny, PJ. Dopamine D2 receptors in addiction-like reward dysfunction and compulsive eating in obese rats. Nat Neurosci. 2010; 13(5): 635641.Google Scholar
76. Maia, TV, Frank, MJ. From reinforcement learning models to psychiatric and neurological disorders. Nat Neurosci. 2011; 14(2): 154162.Google Scholar
77. Frank, GK, Wagner, A, Achenbach, S, et al. Altered brain activity in women recovered from bulimic-type eating disorders after a glucose challenge: a pilot study. Int J Eat Disord. 2006; 39(1): 7679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
78. Radeloff, D, Willmann, K, Otto, L, et al. High-fat taste challenge reveals altered striatal response in women recovered from bulimia nervosa: a pilot study. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2014; 15(4): 307316.Google Scholar
79. Bischoff-Grethe, A, McCurdy, D, Grenesko-Stevens, E, et al. Altered brain response to reward and punishment in adolescents with Anorexia nervosa. Psychiatry Res. 2013; 214(3): 331340.Google Scholar
80. Jappe, LM, Frank, GK, Shott, ME, et al. Heightened sensitivity to reward and punishment in anorexia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord. 2011; 44(4): 317324.Google Scholar
81. Vocks, S, Herpertz, S, Rosenberger, C, Senf, W, Gizewski, ER. Effects of gustatory stimulation on brain activity during hunger and satiety in females with restricting-type anorexia nervosa: an fMRI study. J Psychiatr Res. 2011; 45(3): 395403.Google Scholar
82. Bohon, C, Stice, E. Negative affect and neural response to palatable food intake in bulimia nervosa. Appetite. 2012; 58(3): 964970.Google Scholar
83. Heine, L, Soddu, A, Gomez, F, et al. Resting state networks and consciousness: alterations of multiple resting state network connectivity in physiological, pharmacological, and pathological consciousness states. Front Psychol. 2012; 3: 295.Google Scholar
84. Favaro, A, Santonastaso, P, Manara, R, et al. Disruption of visuospatial and somatosensory functional connectivity in anorexia nervosa. Biol Psychiatry. 2012; 72(10): 864870.Google Scholar
85. Suchan, B, Bauser, DS, Busch, M, et al. Reduced connectivity between the left fusiform body area and the extrastriate body area in anorexia nervosa is associated with body image distortion. Behav Brain Res. 2013; 241: 8085.Google Scholar
86. Cowdrey, FA, Filippini, N, Park, RJ, Smith, SM, McCabe, C. Increased resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network in recovered anorexia nervosa. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014; 35(2): 483491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
87. Kim, KR, Ku, J, Lee, JH, Lee, H, Jung, YC. Functional and effective connectivity of anterior insula in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Neurosci Lett. 2012; 521(2): 152157.Google Scholar
88. Amianto, F, DʼAgata, F, Lavagnino, L, et al. Intrinsic connectivity networks within cerebellum and beyond in eating disorders. Cerebellum. 2013; 12(5): 623631.Google Scholar
89. Kullmann, S, Giel, KE, Teufel, M, Thiel, A, Zipfel, S, Preissl, H. Aberrant network integrity of the inferior frontal cortex in women with anorexia nervosa. Neuroimage Clinical. 2014; 4: 615622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
90. McFadden, KL, Tregellas, JR, Shott, ME, Frank, GK. Reduced salience and default mode network activity in women with anorexia nervosa. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2014; 39(3): 178188.Google Scholar
91. Bailer, UF, Frank, GK, Henry, SE, et al. Altered brain serotonin 5-HT1A receptor binding after recovery from anorexia nervosa measured by positron emission tomography and [carbonyl11C]WAY-100635. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005; 62(9): 10321041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
92. Frank, G, Kaye, W, Meltzer, C, et al. Reduced 5-HT2A receptor binding after recovery from anorexia nervosa. Biol Psychiatry. 2002; 52(9): 896906.Google Scholar
93. Bailer, UF, Frank, GK, Price, JC, et al. Interaction between serotonin transporter and dopamine D2/D3 receptor radioligand measures is associated with harm avoidant symptoms in anorexia and bulimia nervosa. Psychiatry Res. 2013; 211(2): 160168.Google Scholar
94. Tauscher, J, Pirker, W, Willeit, M, et al. [123I] beta-CIT and single photon emission computed tomography reveal reduced brain serotonin transporter availability in bulimia nervosa. Biol Psychiatry. 2001; 49(4): 326332.Google Scholar
95. Tiihonen, J, Keski-Rahkonen, A, Lopponen, M, et al. Brain serotonin 1A receptor binding in bulimia nervosa. Biol Psychiatry. 2004; 55(8): 871873.Google Scholar
96. Bailer, UF, Bloss, CS, Frank, GK, et al. 5-HT(1)A receptor binding is increased after recovery from bulimia nervosa compared to control women and is associated with behavioral inhibition in both groups. Int J Eat Disord. 2011; 44(6): 477487.Google Scholar
97. Frank, GK, Bailer, UF, Henry, SE, et al. Increased dopamine D2/D3 receptor binding after recovery from anorexia nervosa measured by positron emission tomography and [11c]raclopride. Biol Psychiatry. 2005; 58(11): 908912.Google Scholar
98. Wang, G, Volkow, N, Thanos, P, Fowler, JS. Similarity between obesity and drug addiction as assessed by neurofunctional imaging: a concept review. J Addict Dis. 2004; 23(3): 3953.Google Scholar
99. Broft, A, Shingleton, R, Kaufman, J, et al. Striatal dopamine in bulimia nervosa: a PET imaging study. Int J Eat Disord. 2012; 45(5): 648656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
100. Frank, GK. Advances in the diagnosis of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa using brain imaging. Expert Opin Med Diagn. 2012; 6(3): 235244.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1 Increased left orbitofrontal gyrus rectus and right insula volume in anorexia nervosa across states of illness and age groups.

Figure 1

Figure 2 Taste-reward prediction error response across groups with disordered eating patterns.