Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T09:44:05.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation.B. Tomlinson and C. Whittaker (eds.), (2013). London: British Council. ISBN: 978-0-86355-706-4, 252 pages.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2014

Elaine Riordan*
Affiliation:
University of Limerick
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Book review
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2015 

Blended learning is a trend set to continue in language teaching (Dudeney & Hockly, Reference Dudeney and Hockly2012), with its focus on best practice, “i.e. the attempt to identify the optimum mix of course delivery in order to provide the most effective language learning experience” (Sharma, Reference Sharma2010; see also Motteram & Sharma, Reference Motteram and Sharma2009). To this end, this volume offers insights into the use of blended learning in differing English Language Teaching (ELT) contexts, in various parts of the world, each with distinct local needs and constraints. The diversity within this volume is a strength in that its collection of 20 case studies on the practicalities of using blended learning in ELT should target a wide readership including teachers (both novice and practising), course designers, students and researchers.

The case studies in this volume are divided into four ELT contexts, namely English for Academic Purposes (EAP), teacher development, English for Specific Purposes (ESP), and General English/English as a Foreign Language (EFL). In the introductory chapter, Whittaker reviews the literature concerning definitions of blended learning, and the reasons for employing blended learning and the affordances thereof, which she rightly notes is still in need of further research. She also critically discusses the types of blends possible, and the importance of getting the right blends, thus offering the practitioner practical and pedagogical advice from the outset. This leads into the first section of the volume, which addresses four case studies in the field of EAP. Here we are presented with four differing contexts, each with the inherent aim of improving some area of practice by drawing on blended learning, a summary of which can be seen in the breakdown in Table 1.

Table 1 English for Academic Purposes (EAP)

What emerges as salient across these four case studies is the importance of scaffolding learners both in terms of language/content but also the technology, and the value of the teacher/tutor as moderator and facilitator, the latter echoing notions of the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework (Garrison et al., Reference Garrison, Anderson and Archer2000; Anderson et al., Reference Anderson, Rourke, Garrison and Archer2001), which outlines teacher presence as being one of the three elements within online communities (the other two being cognitive and social presence). The significance of aligning the technologies with the course aims and students’ needs was also apparent in all studies, thus demonstrating the informed and pedagogical foundations of the four examples. While these studies indeed highlight the benefits of their approaches, they also make reference to the limitations and need for future improvements, and they demonstrate that differing contexts will render varying challenges. After Part One, Tomlinson comments on the four case studies by bringing everything together for the reader, and providing advice for creating blended learning courses in ELT.

Blended learning courses for teacher development are the focus of the second section of this volume, as can be seen in Table 2.

Table 2 Teacher development

Recurring issues in Part Two include the use of online modes to facilitate deeper reflection, which is at the heart of teacher development and education (Crandall, Reference Crandall2000; Farrell, Reference Farrell2012). The courses outlined here were also often very flexible allowing participants to choose the route and the blend, which encouraged the teachers to learn at their own pace. The notion of a Community of Practice (CoP – Lave & Wenger, Reference Lave and Wenger1991; Wenger, Reference Wenger1998) for sharing and learning was also noted, as was an induction period to get participants familiar with the technology and to allow them to bond as a group, issues which indeed emerge in the literature on developing online communities (Hanson-Smith, Reference Hanson-Smith2006). Also within these studies reference is made to Vygotsky, social learning, collaborative learning, connectivism, and reflective practice all of which are valued and promoted in language teacher education (Johnson, Reference Johnson2006), once again illustrating the theoretical and pedagogical grounding of these case studies. At the end of this section, Tomlinson comments on the flexibility of blended learning and its suitability for teachers who, due to work constraints, may not be able to take time away for professional development. He also considers the dangers of going completely online for teacher development courses, and quite rightly cautions that face-to-face contact is particularly crucial for observations, teaching practice, and feedback.

The third section of this book focuses on ESP, the breakdown of which can be seen in Table 3.

Table 3 English for Specific Purposes (ESP)

Note. CLIL–Content and Language Integrated Learning

Common threads running through this section include that all the case studies seem context dependent and the resultant blend is affected by this. This is clearly an example of good practice, as the authors are choosing both the type of blend and technology from pedagogically founded rationale (see Sharma, Reference Sharma2010). Also, in this context, clients and their needs are the driving force, and the importance of flexibility, self-study, student control over learning pace, and interaction permeates these case studies. At the end of Part Three, Tomlinson once again offers a critical summary, in which he refers to the recurrence of themes pertaining to localisation and personalisation, and reminds us that in an ESP context, blended learning can offer classes tailored to suit clients and their needs.

The fourth and final section comprises blended learning approaches with General English/EFL learners (Table 4).

Table 4 General English/EFL learners

The flexibility that blended learning offers to EFL students and teachers, as well as the wider access and exposure to language as a result of online modes of delivery, and the suitability of blended learning to various learning styles (see Oxford, Reference Oxford2006) are the commonalities in these chapters. At the end of this section, Tomlinson describes how blended learning can promote independent learning, which can be useful for general EFL learners once they finish their courses, and he discusses having the right reasons for using blended learning (and not imposing it), therefore advising that the context and the benefits to learners must be considered.

What all of the chapters have in common is therefore a description of their authors’ approach to blended learning, the tools they used, and why they used them but more notably, they refer to the challenges, advantages, and lessons learned from their endeavours, which for me is one of the many strengths of this volume. Another strength is the concluding chapter, in which Whittaker deals with questions surrounding blended learning under four headings, namely context; course design; learners, teachers and tutors; and evaluating and developing the blend (also provided in an appendix). She insightfully deals with these questions in two ways: by relating them to the existing literature in the field, and by referring to the 20 case studies in this book in order to better inform practice in blended learning. Here she also makes reference to the dearth of blended learning studies in ELT, and notes: “I believe this publication goes some way to addressing those concerns as not only does it provide detailed descriptions of blends from a number of contexts, but it also outlines the lessons the authors learned while designing them and offers constructive advice” (p.240), with which I fully agree.

Therefore, for me, the strengths of the volume are: (1) the practical (as well as theoretically and pedagogically grounded) case studies involving four core sectors of ELT across the world; (2) the structure of the book and individual studies in terms of describing the blends, the contexts, issues that arose regarding the approaches taken, any limitations, as well as lessons learned and future challenges; (3) the editors’ voices both in the introduction and conclusion, but also at the end of each section, making for a very critical and cohesive whole; and (4) the academic and accessible style in which the book is written. Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation is an excellent resource for the many reasons outlined above, and to my knowledge, it is the first volume of case studies on blended learning in the ELT context, which should make it an attractive textbook for those in the field of ELT, language teaching and CALL.

References

Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R. and Archer, W. (2001) Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Networked Learning, 5(2): 117. http://auspace.athabascau.ca/bitstream/2149/725/1/assessing_teaching_presence.pdfGoogle Scholar
Crandall, J. (2000) Language teacher education. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20: 3455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudeney, G. and Hockly, N. (2012) ICT in ELT: How did we get here and where are we going? ELT Journal, 66(4): 533542.Google Scholar
Garrison, R., Anderson, T. and Archer, W. (2000) Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3): 87105.Google Scholar
Farrell, T. (2012) Reflecting on reflective practice: (Re)visiting Dewey and Schön. TESOL Journal, 3(1): 716.Google Scholar
Hanson-Smith, E. (2006) Communities of practice for pre- and in-service teacher education. In: Hubbard, P. and Levy, M. (eds.), Teacher Education in CALL. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 301315.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. E. (2006) The sociocultural turn and its challenges for second language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1): 235257.Google Scholar
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Motteram, G. and Sharma, P. (2009) Blended learning in a Web 2.0 world. International Journal of Emerging Technologies & Society, 7(2): 8396.Google Scholar
Oxford, R. (2006) Language learning styles and strategies: Concepts and relationships. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41(4): 271278.Google Scholar
Sharma, P. (2010) Blended learning. ELT Journal, 64(4): 456458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 English for Academic Purposes (EAP)

Figure 1

Table 2 Teacher development

Figure 2

Table 3 English for Specific Purposes (ESP)

Figure 3

Table 4 General English/EFL learners